Wilderness Character • What It Is • Why It Matters • Interagency Collaboration

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Wilderness Character • What It Is • Why It Matters • Interagency Collaboration Wilderness Character • What it is • Why it matters • Interagency collaboration Wilderness Ranger Academy June 2012 “I have come more and more to the conclusion that wilderness, in America or anywhere else, is the only thing left that is worth saving.” -Edward Abbey Mesa Verde Wilderness, Colorado 1 There is not a lot of wild land out there… 2 Only 10% of the land area is remote (more than 48 hours from a large city) Travel time to major cities in hours (and days) and shipping lane density. Slide courtesy of Ralph Swain The Wilderness Act of 1964 “In order to assure that an increasing population, accompanied by expanding settlement and growing mechanization, does not occupy and modify all areas within the United States and its possessions, leaving no lands designated for preservation and protection in their natural condition, it is hereby declared to be the policy of the Congress to secure for the American people of present and future generations the benefits of an enduring resource of wilderness.” Fire Island Wilderness, New York 4 What is Wilderness? “A wilderness, in contrast with those areas where man and his works dominate the landscape, is hereby recognized as an area where the earth and its community of life are untrammeled by man where man himself is a visitor who does not remain.” –The Wilderness Act of 1964 Shenandoah Wilderness, Virginia 5 Defining Wilderness A Wilderness Area….” (1) generally appears to have been affected primarily by the forces of nature, with the imprint of man's work substantially unnoticeable; (2) has outstanding opportunities for solitude or a primitive and unconfined type of recreation; (3) has at least five thousand acres of land or is of sufficient size as to make practicable its preservation and use in an unimpaired condition; and (4) may also contain ecological, geological, or other features of scientific, educational, scenic, or historical value.” Marjorie Stoneman Douglass Wilderness, Florida 6 Which agency manages the most wilderness AREAS (UNITS)? 7 National Wilderness Preservation System 8 Which agency manages the most wilderness ACRES? 9 National Wilderness Preservation System 10 The Stewardship Task: Preserve Wilderness Character Congress determines the state of wilderness BETTERBETTER character at the time of designation or study Character Character Our task is to sustain or improve this state Wilderness Wilderness WORSEWORSE LESS MORE Modern Human Influence 11 Wilderness Character Framework Key for Stewardship Developed by the “Interagency Wilderness Character Monitoring Team” (2006 – 2008) 12 What is wilderness character? Wilderness Act of 1964 UNTRAMMELED NATURAL Wilderness Character Section 2(c) Definition of Wilderness SOLITUDE OR PRIMITIVED UNDEVELOPED AND Qualities of UNCONFINED RECREATION Wilderness Character OTHER FEATURES AND VALUES Link directly to the LAW Tangible, useful 13 Why Wilderness Character? To Improve On‐the‐ground Stewardship: Understand consequences of decisions and actions in wilderness Provide accountability Provide legacy information that will endure over time when personnel change Communicate a positive and tangible vision for what wilderness is within the agency and with the public Guard against legal vulnerability 14 Wilderness Character in Court “…an improper evaluation of the wilderness character of the area….” Barnes v. Babbitt (D. Ariz.) (2004) “‘Natural conditions’…are part of the ‘wilderness character’ to be preserved.” Wilderness Soc. v. USFWS (9th Cir. En banc) (2003) “…that action degrades the wilderness character….” Izaak Walton League v. Kimbell (D. Minn.) (2007) “[The decision] is in direct contradiction of the mandate to preserve the wilderness character.” OLYM Park Assoc. v. Mainella (West. D. WA) (2005) 15 Qualities of Wilderness Character 1. “Natural” Wilderness ecological systems are substantially free from the effects of modern civilization WHY: • Preserve indigenous species, patterns, and ecological and evolutionary processes • Understand and learn from natural systems 14 Examples of what degrades this quality • Plant and animal species and communities Loss of native animals and plants Occurrence of non-indigenous species • Physical resources Air pollutants Altered water flow • Biophysical processes Climate change Altered disturbance regimes Qualities of Wilderness Character 2. “Solitude or primitive and unconfined recreation” Wilderness provides outstanding opportunities for solitude or primitive and unconfined recreation WHY: • Primitive recreation and the use of traditional skills • Personal challenge and self-discovery • Freedom from the constraints of culture 16 Examples of what degrades this quality • Agency-provided facilities that decrease self-reliant recreation • The sights and sounds of people inside wilderness • Management restrictions on visitor behavior • The sights and sounds of occupied and modified areas outside the wilderness 17 Qualities of Wilderness Character 3. “Undeveloped” Wilderness retains its primeval character and influence, and is essentially without permanent improvement or modern human occupation WHY: • Preserve places from “expanding settlement and growing mechanization” • Allow people to feel a part of “the community of life” 18 EXAMPLES OF WHAT DEGRADES THIS QUALITY • Non-recreational structures or installations • Use of motor vehicles, motorized equipment, or mechanical transport • Inholdings 19 Qualities of Wilderness Character 4. “Untrammeled” Wilderness is essentially unhindered and free from the actions of modern human control or manipulation WHY: • To manage with the utmost humility and restraint • To respect the autonomy of nature, to let a place be wild and free 20 Examples of what degrades this quality • Authorized actions that manipulate, control, or hinder the “community of life” Killing predators Spraying weeds Suppressing fire Stocking fish/wildlife Lighting fire Collaring wildlife • Unauthorized actions that manipulate, control, or hinder the “community of life” “Bucket brigade” 21 Qualities of Wilderness Character 5. “Other features” WHAT: wilderness “may also contain ecological, geological, or other features of scientific, educational, scenic, or historical value.” (Wilderness Act, Sec 2c) WHY: • To protect the tangible features that are unique to the wilderness 22 Damage or loss would degrade these features Paleontological Cultural resources that contribute to wilderness resources character Wilderness character is more than the sum of its parts… …and if one of those parts is taken away or degraded, the whole doesn’t work the way it’s supposed to 23 IMPLICATION: A single decision may affect more than one quality Example: installing scientific equipment to understand the effects of climate change may benefit the natural quality, AND… • The installation degrades the undeveloped quality • The sight and sound of the equipment and its use degrades the solitude quality 25 KEY POINTS ABOUT WILDERNESS CHARACTER • Wilderness character is composed of four qualities that uniquely apply to every wilderness • There may also be an “other features” quality that is part of wilderness character • All qualities of wilderness character are equally important and inter-related • Stewardship decisions to take or not take action affect these qualities 26 What would be the trade‐offs in Wilderness Character? 1. Removing exotic invasive plants by pulling and herbicide with work crews on foot 2. Repairing an eroding trail with new water bars and stone steps 3. Implementing a permit system with designated campsites 4. Re‐establishing an endangered pronghorn population (including building a temporary release pen, radio collars) 29 APPLYING WILDERNESS CHARACTER • Planning • Management • Monitoring SS Using Wilderness Character In Planning • Frame alternatives around wilderness character • Identify desired future conditions for wilderness character • Zone for wilderness character Using Wilderness Character in Analysis Spatial model or map of wilderness character for the Death Valley Wilderness in Death Valley National Park Composed of the four equally weighted qualities, built from 41 weighted input variables Using Wilderness Character in Management • Minimum Requirements Decisions • Science and research activities • Compliance Documents • Commercial services • Maintenance activities • EMS, law enforcement, wildland fire • Interpretation and education • Cultural resources • Training Apply to Monitoring •Measure the future •Adapt management •Protect wilderness character Apply to Decision‐making TRADE‐OFFS: A SINGLE DECISION OR ACTION MAY AFFECT MORE THAN ONE QUALITY Example: installing a barrier to restrict nonnative fish movement •The decision to install the structure to restrict nonnative fish modifies water flow degrades the untrammeled quality •The results of the action will improve the natural quality •The presence of the structure also degrades the undeveloped quality 35 Interagency Collaboration All four wilderness agencies: • Agree on the wilderness character framework • Are moving towards implementing WC monitoring 36 USFS and NPS NPS and USFS are collaborating on a Sangre de Cristo wilderness character assessment summer 2012: • Wilderness Fellow June –November • Select measures and collect baseline • Identify issues and future planning needs 37 The Stewardship Task: Preserve Wilderness Character At your Wilderness: • How can you keep this dot from sliding down the line? BETTERBETTER • How can you move it up? Character Character Wilderness Wilderness WORSEWORSE LESS MORE Modern Human Influence 38 Thanks! Questions? Comments? FOR MORE INFORMATION: Wilderness.net > Management Tools > Toolboxes > Wilderness Character Maroon Bells Wilderness, Colorado 39.
Recommended publications
  • VGP) Version 2/5/2009
    Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS (VGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act (CWA), as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), any owner or operator of a vessel being operated in a capacity as a means of transportation who: • Is eligible for permit coverage under Part 1.2; • If required by Part 1.5.1, submits a complete and accurate Notice of Intent (NOI) is authorized to discharge in accordance with the requirements of this permit. General effluent limits for all eligible vessels are given in Part 2. Further vessel class or type specific requirements are given in Part 5 for select vessels and apply in addition to any general effluent limits in Part 2. Specific requirements that apply in individual States and Indian Country Lands are found in Part 6. Definitions of permit-specific terms used in this permit are provided in Appendix A. This permit becomes effective on December 19, 2008 for all jurisdictions except Alaska and Hawaii. This permit and the authorization to discharge expire at midnight, December 19, 2013 i Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 William K. Honker, Acting Director Robert W. Varney, Water Quality Protection Division, EPA Region Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1 6 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, Barbara A.
    [Show full text]
  • Keeping It Wild in the National Park Service
    Wilderness Stewardship Division National Park Service Wilderness Stewardship Program U.S. Department of the Interior Keeping It Wild in the National Park Service A USER GUIDE TO INTEGRATING WILDERNESS CHARACTER INTO PARK PLANNING, MANAGEMENT, AND MONITORING Keeping it Wild in the National Park Service A User Guide to Integrating Wilderness Character into Park Planning, Management, and Monitoring National Park Service | U.S. Department of the Interior Wilderness Stewardship Division | Wilderness Stewardship Program January 2014 Cover photos: (Top) NPS/Suzy Stutzman, Great Sand Dunes Wilderness, Great Sand Dunes National Park (Left) NPS/Peter Landres, recommended wilderness, Canyonlands National Park (Right) NPS/Peter Landres, recommended wilderness, Cedar Breaks National Monument KEEPING IT WILD IN THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE A USER GUIDE TO INTEGRATING WILDERNESS CHARACTER INTO PARK PLANNING, MANAGEMENT, AND MONITORING Developed by the National Park Service Wilderness Character Integration Team with funding and support from the NPS Office of Park Planning and Special Studies and the Wilderness Stewardship Division A Companion Document to the 2014 Wilderness Stewardship Plan Handbook: Planning to Preserve Wilderness Character WASO 909/121797; January 2014 EXECUTIVE SummARY This User Guide was developed to help National Park Service (NPS) staff effectively and efficiently fulfill the mandate from the 1964 Wilderness Act and NPS policy to “preserve wilderness character” now and into the future. This mandate applies to all congressionally designated wilderness and other park lands that are, by policy, managed as wilderness, including eligible, potential, proposed, or recommended wilderness. This User Guide builds on the ideas in Keeping It Wild: An Interagency Strategy to Monitor Trends in Wilderness Character Across the National Wilderness Preservation System (Landres and others 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Small Vessel General Permit
    ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PUBLIC NOTICE The United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 W. Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois has requested a determination from the Illinois Department of Natural Resources if their Vessel General Permit (VGP) and Small Vessel General Permit (sVGP) are consistent with the enforceable policies of the Illinois Coastal Management Program (ICMP). VGP regulates discharges incidental to the normal operation of commercial vessels and non-recreational vessels greater than or equal to 79 ft. in length. sVGP regulates discharges incidental to the normal operation of commercial vessels and non- recreational vessels less than 79 ft. in length. VGP and sVGP can be viewed in their entirety at the ICMP web site http://www.dnr.illinois.gov/cmp/Pages/CMPFederalConsistencyRegister.aspx Inquiries concerning this request may be directed to Jim Casey of the Department’s Chicago Office at (312) 793-5947 or [email protected]. You are invited to send written comments regarding this consistency request to the Michael A. Bilandic Building, 160 N. LaSalle Street, Suite S-703, Chicago, Illinois 60601. All comments claiming the proposed actions would not meet federal consistency must cite the state law or laws and how they would be violated. All comments must be received by July 19, 2012. Proposed Small Vessel General Permit (sVGP) United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) SMALL VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS LESS THAN 79 FEET (sVGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act, as amended (33 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Wilderness Report National Park Service Wilderness Stewardship Program 2 NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • WILDERNESS STEWARDSHIP PROGRAM • 2018 REPORT
    National Park Service US Department of Interior Wilderness Stewardship Division Visitor and Resource Protection Directorate 2018 Wilderness Report National Park Service Wilderness Stewardship Program 2 NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • WILDERNESS STEWARDSHIP PROGRAM • 2018 REPORT The National Park Service will manage wilderness areas for the use and enjoyment of National Park Service Management the American people in such a manner as will leave them unimpaired for future use and Policies 2006, Chapter 6: Wilderness enjoyment as wilderness. Management will include the protection of these areas, the Preservation and Management preservation of their wilderness character, and the gather and dissemination of information regarding their use and enjoyment as wilderness. The purpose of wilderness in the national parks includes the preservation of wilderness character and wilderness resources in an unimpaired condition and, in accordance with the Wilderness Act, wilderness areas shall be devoted to the public purposes of recreational, scenice, scientific, educational, conservation, and historical use. Cover Photo: Shenandoah Wilderness, Shenandoah National Park. Photo Credit: NPS 3 Table of Contents Message from Division Chief ............... 4 2018 NPS Wilderness Champions ......... 5 STEWARDSHIP & SCIENCE ........ 7 TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT ... 10 COMMUNICATION & COLLABORATION ........................ 12 Park-Based Wilderness Character Preservation of Wilderness Character Preservation Efforts Trainings Upcoming NPS WIlderness Interpretation Wilderness Character
    [Show full text]
  • 1976/10/20 HR9719 Payments in Lieu of Taxes (2)” of the White House Records Office: Legislation Case Files at the Gerald R
    The original documents are located in Box 67, folder “1976/10/20 HR9719 Payments in Lieu of Taxes (2)” of the White House Records Office: Legislation Case Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald R. Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Exact duplicates within this folder were not digitized. Digitized from Box 67 of the White House Records Office Legislation Case Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library 94TH CoNGREss } REPORT 2d Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES { No. 94-1106 PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF TAXES ACT REPORT OF THE COM1.IITTEE ON INTERIOR AND INSULAR AFFAIRS . •. ' ~ ! ' .; · together with ADDITIONAL AND SEPARATE VIEWS TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 9719 MAY 7, 1976.-0rdered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 57-Q06 WASHINGTON : 1976 COMMITTEE ON INTERIOR AND INSULAR AFFAIRS HOtJSll: OF REtRESENTATIVES JAMES A. HALEY, Florida, Chairman Y '·•·All TAYLOR, North Carolina JOE SKUBITZ, Kansas, Ranking Minoritv ; ·'~ ROLD '1\i:!.OHNSON, California Member ,· MORRIS K. 'f;}>AI.L, Arizona SAM STEIGER, Arizona CONTENTS f.j,j PHILLIP BURtON, California DON H.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1464 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1132
    § 1132 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION Page 1464 Department and agency having jurisdiction of, and reports submitted to Congress regard- thereover immediately before its inclusion in ing pending additions, eliminations, or modi- the National Wilderness Preservation System fications. Maps, legal descriptions, and regula- unless otherwise provided by Act of Congress. tions pertaining to wilderness areas within No appropriation shall be available for the pay- their respective jurisdictions also shall be ment of expenses or salaries for the administra- available to the public in the offices of re- tion of the National Wilderness Preservation gional foresters, national forest supervisors, System as a separate unit nor shall any appro- priations be available for additional personnel and forest rangers. stated as being required solely for the purpose of managing or administering areas solely because (b) Review by Secretary of Agriculture of classi- they are included within the National Wilder- fications as primitive areas; Presidential rec- ness Preservation System. ommendations to Congress; approval of Con- (c) ‘‘Wilderness’’ defined gress; size of primitive areas; Gore Range-Ea- A wilderness, in contrast with those areas gles Nest Primitive Area, Colorado where man and his own works dominate the The Secretary of Agriculture shall, within ten landscape, is hereby recognized as an area where years after September 3, 1964, review, as to its the earth and its community of life are un- suitability or nonsuitability for preservation as trammeled by man, where man himself is a visi- wilderness, each area in the national forests tor who does not remain. An area of wilderness classified on September 3, 1964 by the Secretary is further defined to mean in this chapter an area of undeveloped Federal land retaining its of Agriculture or the Chief of the Forest Service primeval character and influence, without per- as ‘‘primitive’’ and report his findings to the manent improvements or human habitation, President.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness Stewardship Program 2012 Wilderness Report 2 NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • WILDERNESS STEWARDSHIP PROGRAM • 2012 REPORT
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Wilderness Stewardship Program 2012 Wilderness Report 2 NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • WILDERNESS STEWARDSHIP PROGRAM • 2012 REPORT The mission of the National Park Service (NPS) Wilderness Stewardship Program is to identify and advance park lands to become part of the National Wilderness Preservation System and to steward those lands at the highest level of wilderness protection. The Program trains NPS staff and educates the public about wilderness character, values, and ethics. Further, the Program works closely with its sister agencies and external partners to enhance capacity and engage stakeholders in becoming global stewards of our remaining wild landscapes. ON THE COVER Save wild places. Marjory Stoneman Douglas Wilderness, Inspire generations. Everglades National Park. NPS photo. CENTER Kobuk Valley Wilderness, Kobuk Valley National Park. NPS photo. 3 CONTENTS Wes Henry Award Recipients ............................................................ 4 Wilderness Accomplishments Capacity Building ................................................................................ 5 Wilderness Stewardship ...................................................................... 6 Education and Outreach ..................................................................... 7 Training .............................................................................................. 9 Appendices Appendix A: Wilderness Leadership Council ..................................... 10 Appendix B: Regional Wilderness
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 NPS Wilderness Report
    National Park Service US Department of Interior Wilderness Stewardship Division Visitor and Resource Protection Directorate 2019 Wilderness Report National Park Service Wilderness Stewardship Program 2 NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • WILDERNESS STEWARDSHIP PROGRAM • 2019 REPORT The National Park Service will manage wilderness areas for the use and enjoyment of National Park Service Management the American people in such a manner as will leave them unimpaired for future use and Policies 2006, Chapter 6: Wilderness enjoyment as wilderness. Management will include the protection of these areas, the Preservation and Management preservation of their wilderness character, and the gather and dissemination of information regarding their use and enjoyment as wilderness. The purpose of wilderness in the national parks includes the preservation of wilderness character and wilderness resources in an unimpaired condition and, in accordance with the Wilderness Act, wilderness areas shall be devoted to the public purposes of recreational, scenic, scientific, educational, conservation, and historical use. Cover Image: “North Passage Aurora” by Tom Rudd and Margo McCafferty (woodcut print) Past Artists-in-Residence at Isle Royale National Park Image is also displayed on pages 8, 12, and 14. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • WILDERNESS STEWARDSHIP PROGRAM • 2019 REPORT 3 Table of Contents Message from Division Chief ............... 4 2019 NPS Wilderness Champions ......... 5 STEWARDSHIP & SCIENCE ........ 8 TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT ... 12 COMMUNICATION & Wilderness Character
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1480 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1113 (Pub
    § 1113 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION Page 1480 (Pub. L. 88–363, § 13, July 7, 1964, 78 Stat. 301.) ment of expenses or salaries for the administra- tion of the National Wilderness Preservation § 1113. Authorization of appropriations System as a separate unit nor shall any appro- There are hereby authorized to be appro- priations be available for additional personnel priated to the Department of the Interior with- stated as being required solely for the purpose of out fiscal year limitation such sums as may be managing or administering areas solely because necessary for the purposes of this chapter and they are included within the National Wilder- the agreement with the Government of Canada ness Preservation System. signed January 22, 1964, article 11 of which pro- (c) ‘‘Wilderness’’ defined vides that the Governments of the United States A wilderness, in contrast with those areas and Canada shall share equally the costs of de- where man and his own works dominate the veloping and the annual cost of operating and landscape, is hereby recognized as an area where maintaining the Roosevelt Campobello Inter- the earth and its community of life are un- national Park. trammeled by man, where man himself is a visi- (Pub. L. 88–363, § 14, July 7, 1964, 78 Stat. 301.) tor who does not remain. An area of wilderness is further defined to mean in this chapter an CHAPTER 23—NATIONAL WILDERNESS area of undeveloped Federal land retaining its PRESERVATION SYSTEM primeval character and influence, without per- manent improvements or human habitation, Sec. which is protected and managed so as to pre- 1131.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wilderness Act of 1964
    The Wilderness Act of 1964 Source: US House of Representatives Office of the Law This is the 1964 act that started it all Revision Counsel website at and created the first designated http://uscode.house.gov/download/ascii.shtml wilderness in the US and Nevada. This version, updated January 2, 2006, includes a list of all wilderness designated before that date. The list does not mention designations made by the December 2006 White Pine County bill. -CITE- 16 USC CHAPTER 23 - NATIONAL WILDERNESS PRESERVATION SYSTEM 01/02/2006 -EXPCITE- TITLE 16 - CONSERVATION CHAPTER 23 - NATIONAL WILDERNESS PRESERVATION SYSTEM -HEAD- CHAPTER 23 - NATIONAL WILDERNESS PRESERVATION SYSTEM -MISC1- Sec. 1131. National Wilderness Preservation System. (a) Establishment; Congressional declaration of policy; wilderness areas; administration for public use and enjoyment, protection, preservation, and gathering and dissemination of information; provisions for designation as wilderness areas. (b) Management of area included in System; appropriations. (c) "Wilderness" defined. 1132. Extent of System. (a) Designation of wilderness areas; filing of maps and descriptions with Congressional committees; correction of errors; public records; availability of records in regional offices. (b) Review by Secretary of Agriculture of classifications as primitive areas; Presidential recommendations to Congress; approval of Congress; size of primitive areas; Gore Range-Eagles Nest Primitive Area, Colorado. (c) Review by Secretary of the Interior of roadless areas of national park system and national wildlife refuges and game ranges and suitability of areas for preservation as wilderness; authority of Secretary of the Interior to maintain roadless areas in national park system unaffected. (d) Conditions precedent to administrative recommendations of suitability of areas for preservation as wilderness; publication in Federal Register; public hearings; views of State, county, and Federal officials; submission of views to Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resource Potential of National Forest RARE II and Wilderness Areas in Colorado
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Mineral resource potential of National Forest RARE II and wilderness areas in Colorado Compiled By Robert P. Dickerson 1 Open-File Report 86-0364 1986 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. Denver, Colorado CONTENTS (See also indices listings, p. 173) Page Introduction..................................................... 1 Grand Mesa, Gunnison, and Uncompahgre National Forests........... 2 Elk Mountains-Collegiate (2-180)............................ 2 Collegiate Peaks Wilderness (NF-180)........................ 2 Elk Mountains-Collegiate (2-180)............................ 5 Maroon Bells-Snowmass Wilderness (NF-047)................... 5 Oh-Be-Joyful (2-181)........................................ 6 Ragged Mountain Wilderness (NF-181)......................... 7 Raggeds (2-181)............................................. 7 Drift Creek (2-182).......................................... 9 Perham Creek (2-183)........................................ 9 Springhouse Park (2-184).................................... 10 Electric Mountain (2-185)................................... 10 Clear Creek (2-186)......................................... 11 Hightower (2-189)........................................... 12 Priest Mountain (2-191)..................................... 12 Salt Creek (2-192).......................................... 12 Battlement Mesa (2-193)....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kiowa National Grasslands Draft Wilderness Evaluation Report
    Kiowa National Grasslands Draft Wilderness Evaluation Report Canadian River Potential Wilderness Area PW-03-03-01G October 24, 2007 This draft potential wilderness evaluation report is divided into three parts: capability, availability, and need. Capability and availability are intended to be objective evaluations of existing conditions in the Canadian River Potential Wilderness Area. The most important area of focus for public comment is the “need” evaluation. The intent of this part of the evaluation is to consider if the Canadian River fits into the National Wilderness Preservation System at the regional level. This report offers data that helps us understand different sources that might generate need; ultimately, however, need for wilderness is generated by public demand. Therefore, public input is an essential component of this part of the wilderness evaluation. We would like your feedback on this draft report - if we have missed an important detail or you would like to share your comments or other input, please contact us (our contact information can be found on the last page of this report). DRAFT 10/24/2007 Table of Contents Introduction ...............................................................................2 Area Overview............................................................................2 Wilderness Capability ..................................................................4 Availability for Wilderness ............................................................6 Need for Wilderness ....................................................................8
    [Show full text]