Promoting Sustainable Forest Management in Eastern Europe & Russia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Promoting Sustainable Forest Management in Eastern Europe & Russia Promoting Sustainable Forest Management in Eastern Europe & Russia Accomplishments & Lessons Learned from IUCN’s Activities in the ENPI FLEG Program Stefania Almazán Xi Chen Selin Nurgün Nadia Vandergriff Allegra Wrocklage Faculty Advisors: Robyn Meeks Julia Wondolleck April 22, 2016 Client: International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources | Gland, Switzerland Acknowledgements The authors acknowledge that the assistance of the following people and organizations were essential to the development of this report. We would like to thank the donors of the ENPI East FLEG II program: the European Commission, the World Bank Group, and the Austrian Development Corporation. We would like to acknowledge and thank the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources for enabling our engagement in this project. In particular, we would like to thank Richard Aishton, IUCN-FLEG Project Coordinator, for his commitment to this project and his guidance and insights on the FLEG program through interviews, extensive conversations, and feedback on drafts. We would also like to thank Ekaterine Otarashvili, IUCN-FLEG Project Officer, for her insights and feedback. We would like to thank the seven IUCN-FLEG Country Program Coordinators, who provided their time, knowledge, and expertise through multiple interviews, emails, and feedback on drafts: Andrey Zaytsev, Aurel Lozan, Azer Garayev, Luba Balyan, Marika Kavtarishvili, Marina Belous, and Roman Volosyanchuk. We would also like to thank Maggie Roth and Mark Gnadt for offering their time and insights on FLEG. We would especially like to thank our faculty advisors at the University of Michigan School of Natural Resources & Environment: Assistant Professor Robyn Meeks and Associate Professor Julia Wondolleck. Their support, knowledge, and perspective were essential to initiating this project, guiding our work, and developing this report. Stefania Almazán Casali would like to thank Mexico’s National Council for Science and Technology (CONACyT) for their sponsorship. Her participation in this project would not have been possible without their support. We are also indebted to our funders, the University of Michigan School of Natural Resources & Environment and the University of Michigan Weiser Center for Emerging Democracies. i Table of Contents Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................ i Abstract ......................................................................................................................................... iv Chapter 1: Introduction, Context & Methods ........................................................................... 1 I. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 II. Background on FLEG .......................................................................................................................... 2 III. Research Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 6 IV. Research Stages .................................................................................................................................. 7 V. Roadmap for Report ............................................................................................................................. 9 Chapter 2: Case Studies ............................................................................................................. 14 Case Study 1: Climate Change Adaptation, Azerbaijan ......................................................................... 15 Case Study 2: Empowering Forest-Dependent Communities through Roadshows, Armenia ................ 27 Case Study 3: Forest Dependence Study, Belarus .................................................................................. 42 Case Study 4. Pest and Disease Management, Georgia .......................................................................... 53 Case Study 5: Tusheti Protected Landscape Community Management, Georgia ................................... 65 Case Study 6. Agency Moldsilva’s Communication Strategy ................................................................ 80 Case Study 7. Bezhanitsy Eco-Tourism Development Alliance, Russia ................................................ 91 Case Study 8. Open Letter on Forest Reform Legislation, Ukraine ..................................................... 110 Case Study 9: Regional Forest Dependence Study ............................................................................... 118 Chapter 3: Facilitating Factors & Challenges........................................................................ 129 in Implementing IUCN-FLEG Activities ................................................................................ 129 I. Facilitating Factors ............................................................................................................................ 130 A. CPC Characteristics and Qualifications .................................................................................... 130 B. IUCN-FLEG’s Professional Reputation and Network .............................................................. 132 C. IUCN-FLEG Program Structure and Culture ........................................................................... 136 II. Challenges ........................................................................................................................................ 139 A. Community Resistance ............................................................................................................. 139 B. Government Transitions and Procedural Constraints ............................................................... 141 C. Capacity Limitations ................................................................................................................. 142 Chapter 4: Conclusions ............................................................................................................ 144 I. Qualities of the IUCN Team and its Culture ..................................................................................... 144 II. Qualities of the IUCN-FLEG Program and its Strategic Approach ................................................. 145 III. Final Observations .......................................................................................................................... 147 Appendices ................................................................................................................................. 148 ii Appendix A: Narrative Interview Questions ........................................................................................ 149 Appendix B: Forest Dependence Study Interview Questions ............................................................... 150 Appendix C: Interview List .................................................................................................................. 151 Appendix D: IUCN-FLEG Program Coordination Email Survey Questions ....................................... 152 Appendix E: IUCN-FLEG Program Coordination Email Survey Respondents ................................... 153 Appendix F: Questionnaire for Forestry Sector Professionals – Climate Change Adaptation ............. 154 Appendix G: Full List of Facilitating Factors for each Case Study ...................................................... 155 Appendix H: List of Partner Organizations for each Case Study (except Regional) ............................ 156 Appendix I: Full List of Challenges for each Case Study ..................................................................... 157 Appendix J: Acronyms ......................................................................................................................... 158 Appendix K: IUCN-FLEG Contacts ..................................................................................................... 159 Appendix L: About the ENPI FLEG II Program .................................................................................. 160 iii Promoting Sustainable Forest Management in Eastern Europe & Russia Accomplishments & Lessons Learned from IUCN’s Activities in the ENPI FLEG Program Abstract The Forest Law Enforcement and Governance (FLEG) II European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument (ENPI) East Countries Programme (ENPI FLEG Program) supports participating countries’ forest governance. At the regional level, the Programme, funded by the European Union and implemented by the World Bank, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) and World Wide Fund for Nature, aims to implement the 2005 St. Petersburg FLEG Ministerial Declaration and support countries to commit to a time- bound action plan. At the national level the Programme reviews or revises forest sector policies and legal and administrative structures. It also aims to improve knowledge of and support for sustainable forest management and good forest governance in participating countries. At the sub- national (local) level, the Programme tests and demonstrates best practices for sustainable forest management and the feasibility of improved forest governance practices at the field-level on a pilot basis. The ENPI FLEG Program is an innovative approach that was developed in response to illegal forest activities in Eastern Europe and Russia.
Recommended publications
  • Social and Economic Space Compression in Border Areas: the Case of the Northwestern Federal District Romanova, E.; Vinogradova, O.; Frizina, I
    www.ssoar.info Social and economic space compression in border areas: the case of the Northwestern Federal District Romanova, E.; Vinogradova, O.; Frizina, I. Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Romanova, E., Vinogradova, O., & Frizina, I. (2015). Social and economic space compression in border areas: the case of the Northwestern Federal District. Baltic Region, 3, 28-46. https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2015-3-3 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Free Digital Peer Publishing Licence This document is made available under a Free Digital Peer zur Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den DiPP-Lizenzen Publishing Licence. For more Information see: finden Sie hier: http://www.dipp.nrw.de/lizenzen/dppl/service/dppl/ http://www.dipp.nrw.de/lizenzen/dppl/service/dppl/ Diese Version ist zitierbar unter / This version is citable under: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-51391-6 Economic and geographical development of the Russian Northwest ECONOMIC AND GEOGRAPHICAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE RUSSIAN NORTHWEST The so-called “compression” of social SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC and economic space has been the subject of SPACE COMPRESSION quite a few studies in the past decades. There are two principle types of compres- IN BORDER AREAS: sion: communicative, that is, associated THE CASE with the development of transport and in- OF THE NORTHWESTERN formation systems, and physical, mani- FEDERAL DISTRICT fested in the rapid decrease of the number of new territories to explore. While physi- cal and communicative compression are in- terrelated, they have different spatial ex- * pressions depending on geographical con- E.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Section Reprint the STRUGGLE for TROGLODYTES1
    The RELICT HOMINOID INQUIRY 6:33-170 (2017) Book Section Reprint THE STRUGGLE FOR TROGLODYTES1 Boris Porshnev "I have no doubt that some fact may appear fantastic and incredible to many of my readers. For example, did anyone believe in the existence of Ethiopians before seeing any? Isn't anything seen for the first time astounding? How many things are thought possible only after they have been achieved?" (Pliny, Natural History of Animals, Vol. VII, 1) INTRODUCTION BERNARD HEUVELMANS Doctor in Zoological Sciences How did I come to study animals, and from the study of animals known to science, how did I go on to that of still undiscovered animals, and finally, more specifically to that of unknown humans? It's a long story. For me, everything started a long time ago, so long ago that I couldn't say exactly when. Of course it happened gradually. Actually – I have said this often – one is born a zoologist, one does not become one. However, for the discipline to which I finally ended up fully devoting myself, it's different: one becomes a cryptozoologist. Let's specify right now that while Cryptozoology is, etymologically, "the science of hidden animals", it is in practice the study and research of animal species whose existence, for lack of a specimen or of sufficient anatomical fragments, has not been officially recognized. I should clarify what I mean when I say "one is born a zoologist. Such a congenital vocation would imply some genetic process, such as that which leads to a lineage of musicians or mathematicians.
    [Show full text]
  • Result Sheet
    Sun and Wind ELRII-473 outputs and results Energy and robotics Outputs hobby-group Local heating and electricity supply systems are modernised in 5 public buildings in Estonia and Pskov Region, Russia Obinitsa village center and Rõuge municipality house energy systems was renoveted with ground heat pumps integrated with solar PV panels Street lighting systems installed in Rõuge (Estonia) and in Tyamsha (Russia) Lightening system installed in Rõuge, Estonia Trainings and capacity building seminars for energy experts and municipality employees organised. Networking of energy experts and local authorities and public representatives is established Secondary school in Boroussy village, Russia equipped with solar panels, which provide hot water for the school 1 Energy Class modernised in Rõuge School by New biomass boilers in Gavry (Pytalovo), Russia installing the smart board and purchasing new equipment for energy measuring. Also weekly energetics-robotics hobby group was regularly attended by students in Rõuge Energy day on Energy Saving Technologies and Renewable Energy Systems (RES) with participation of Russian and Estonian students was held A number of showcases of using solar and wind Solar Panel installed in Boroussy village, Russia power, biofuel and ground heat as possible energy resources were demonstrared Various seminars and study tours on renewable energy and energy efficiency were organised for a wide range of participants RESULTS Increase of knowledge and awareness of local authorities and the community, especially youth on
    [Show full text]
  • A Study on Fauna of the Shahdagh National Park
    J. Appl. Environ. Biol. Sci. , 5(10)11-15, 2015 ISSN: 2090-4274 Journal of Applied Environmental © 2015, TextRoad Publication and Biological Sciences www.textroad.com A Study on fauna of the Shahdagh National Park S.M. Guliyev Institute of Zoology of Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences, Pass.1128, block 504, Baku, AZ 1073, Azerbaijan Received: June 2, 2015 Accepted: August 27, 2015 ABSTRACT The paper contains information about mammals and insects entered the Red Book of Azerbaijanand the Red List of IUCN distributed in the Azerbaijan territories of the Greater Caucasus (South and North slopes). Researche carried out in the 2008-2012 years. It can be noted that from 43 species of mammals and 76 species of insects entering the Red Book of Azerbaijan 23 ones of mammals ( Rhinolophus hipposideros Bechstein, 1800, Myotis bechsteinii Kunhl, 1817, M.emarqinatus Geoffroy, 1806, M.blythii Tomas, 1875, Barbastella barbastella Scheber, 1774, Barbastella leucomelas Cretzchmar, 1826, Eptesicus bottae Peters, 1869, Hystrix indica Kerr, 1792, Micromys minutus Pollas, 1771, Chionomys gud Satunin,1909, Hyaena hyaena Linnaeus, 1758, Ursus arctos (Linnaeus, 1758), Martes martes (Linnaeus, 1758), Mustela (Mustela) erminea , 1758, Lutra lutra (Linnaeus, 1758), Telus (Chaus) Chaus Gued., 1776, Lynx lynx (Linnaeus, 1758), Pantherapardus (Linnaeus, 1758), Rupicara rupicapra (Linnaeus, 1758), Capreolus capreolus (Linnaeus, 1758), Cervus elaphus maral (Ogilbi, 1840), Capra cylindricornis Bulth, 1840) and 15 species of insects ( Carabus (Procerus) caucasicus
    [Show full text]
  • Global Forest Resources Assessment (FRA) 2020 Azerbaijan
    Report Azerbaijan Rome, 2020 FRA 2020 report, Azerbaijan FAO has been monitoring the world's forests at 5 to 10 year intervals since 1946. The Global Forest Resources Assessments (FRA) are now produced every five years in an attempt to provide a consistent approach to describing the world's forests and how they are changing. The FRA is a country-driven process and the assessments are based on reports prepared by officially nominated National Correspondents. If a report is not available, the FRA Secretariat prepares a desk study using earlier reports, existing information and/or remote sensing based analysis. This document was generated automatically using the report made available as a contribution to the FAO Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020, and submitted to FAO as an official government document. The content and the views expressed in this report are the responsibility of the entity submitting the report to FAO. FAO cannot be held responsible for any use made of the information contained in this document. 2 FRA 2020 report, Azerbaijan TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1. Forest extent, characteristics and changes 2. Forest growing stock, biomass and carbon 3. Forest designation and management 4. Forest ownership and management rights 5. Forest disturbances 6. Forest policy and legislation 7. Employment, education and NWFP 8. Sustainable Development Goal 15 3 FRA 2020 report, Azerbaijan Introduction Report preparation and contact persons The present report was prepared by the following person(s) Name Role Email Tables (old contact) Sadig Salmanov Collaborator [email protected] All Sadig Salmanov National correspondent [email protected] All Introductory text Forests are considered to be one of the most valuable natural resources of Azerbaijan that integrate soil, water, trees, bushes, vegetation, wildlife, and microorganisms which mutually affect each other from biological viewpoint in the course of development.
    [Show full text]
  • 1.1 Forests and Forest Use in Russia
    Dependency of Russian Villages on Forest Resources National Analytical Report, Russia October 2014 This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The content, findings, interpretations, and conclusions of this publication are the sole responsibility of the FLEG II (ENPI East) Programme Team (www.enpi-fleg.org) and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the Implementing Organizations. Table of contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................ 3 1.1 Forests and forest use in Russia ............................................................................................................. 3 1.2 Rationale ............................................................................................................................................................. 4 2. Methodology .............................................................................................................................................................. 4 2.1 Study area........................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Method of sampling ........................................................................................................................................ 5 2.3 Number of households .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Mission Report SUBMITTED BY: İsmail Belen, TCDC Consultant For
    Mission Report SUBMITTED BY: İsmail Belen, TCDC Consultant for Public Awareness and Training, CEM/MoFWA, Turkey COUNTRIES VISITED: Azerbaijan DATES OF MISSION: 21-25 July 2014 DATE OF REPORT: 2 August 2014 1 Contents List of Pictures ................................................................................................................................ 4 List of Figures ................................................................................................................................. 4 Summary ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Background and purpose................................................................................................................. 6 Daily Programmes .......................................................................................................................... 8 21 July 2014 Monday...................................................................................................................... 8 22 July 2014 Tuesday ..................................................................................................................... 8 Prepatory Meeting ........................................................................................................................... 8 Meeting With Minister of Ecology and Natural Resources ............................................................ 9 Visiting to FAO Office ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Dependency in Rural Azerbaijan
    Forest Dependency in Rural Azerbaijan Based on the Case Study in Zagatala district Baku, October 2014 This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The content, findings, interpretations, and conclusions of this publication are the sole responsibility of the FLEG II (ENPI East) Programme Team (www.enpi-fleg.org) and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the Implementing Organizations. CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES II ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS III EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. Introduction i) Forests and forest use in your Azerbaijan ii) Rationale 2. Methodology i) Study area ii) Method of sampling iii) Number of households iv) Timeline v) Field implementation and problems vi) Local unit conversion (incl. from key informant interview) 3. Study area characteristics i) Brief history of villages ii) Demographics iii) Infrastructure availability iv) Economic data v) Major economic activities vi) Seasonal calendar: vii) Major markets and market access viii) Major land cover and land uses ix) Description of conservation areas x) Tenure and governance xi) Government and other development/conservation projects xii) Calamities xiii) Other relevant issues 4. Results and discussion i) Income share by source ii) Frequency and value of forest products a. Fuelwood iii) Cash and subsistence of forest products iv) RFI over income quintiles v) RFI over asset groups vi) Most Important Products 5. Conclusion 6. References 1 LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES: Table 1: Seasonal calendar Figure 1: Income share by source Figure 2: Frequency of forest product collected Figure 3: Forest products by value Figure 4: Cash and subsistence of forest products Figure 5: RFI over income quintiles Figure 6: RFI over asset groups Figure 7, 8: Most Important Products 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction In the Republic of Azerbaijan forested areas cover 1,021 hectares of the land, which is 11.8% of the country’s territory.
    [Show full text]
  • Capacity Building in Sharing Forest and Market Information”
    Workshop “ Capacity Building in Sharing Forest and Market Information” 24 – 28 October 2005, Prague and Křtiny, Czech Republic Country statement Azerbaijan ­ Forest Resources Assessment for Sustainable Forest Management ­ Mr. SADIG SALMANOV Main Specialist Ministry of Ecology and Natural Resources Baghramyan 3 AM ­ 375002 Jerevan Azerbaijan Evaluation of Inexhaustible Forest Resources Management in Azerbaijan a) Brief review on forest resources Azerbaijan has got 1 214 000 km 2 of forest lands, which makes 11,4 % of its whole area. Among these 1 000 035 ha are proper forests and 989 000 ha are covered with forests but of irregular consistency. The forests are distributed as follows: Grand Caucasus ­ 49%; Small Caucasus – 34%; Talish Mountains – 15%; Lowlands – 2%. The forests are an integral part of the ecosystem of Azerbaijan. They are generally related to the 1s t group. However, they play a significant role not only in climate forming processes, prevention of desertification, decrease of natural diversity, and greenhouse effect, but also help solve social, economic and cultural problems. Due to territorial heterogeneity and complicated landscape, trees and shrubs can grow as high as 2000­2200 metres above the sea level. It also accounts for the great diversity of plant life. 435 wood and shrubs species grow in our republic, of which 107 wood and 288 shrub species are wide­spread and cover large areas. Eastern beech (Fagus orientalis) plays an important role in forming of forest stands. It can be met on 32% of the forest land. Oak (Quercus) is a frequent tree species in both hilly and plain regions and occupies 31,5% of the forest area.
    [Show full text]
  • Pskov Regional Centre for Medical Prevention
    PSKOV REGIONAL CENTRE FOR MEDICAL PREVENTION IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NORDIC COUNCIL OF MINISTERS’ COOPERATION WITH NORTHWEST RUSSIA IN HEALTH PROMOTION AND DISEASE PREVENTION: MOBILIZING RESOURCES FOR BETTER RESPONSE TO HIV AND ASSOCIATED INFECTIONS: ACTIVITIES IN PSKOV REGION NORDIC COUNCIL OF MINISTERS’ COOPERATION WITH NORTHWEST RUSSIA The National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL) is the administrator of the Programme Eligible NW Russian regions: St. Petersburg, Arkhangelsk Region, Kaliningrad Region, Leningrad Region, Murmansk Region, Pskov Region, and Republic of Karelia ONE OF THE TWO OBJECTIVES OF THE PROGRAMME: STRENGTHENING INNOVATIVE PREVENTION WORK AMONG YOUNG PEOPLE AND SUPPORT TO VOLUNTEERISM Pursuant to order of the Pskov Regional Committee of Healthcare and Pharmacy “Approval of the local action plan for the implementation of the cooperation programme” (05.07.2017 № 550), it was decided to: Train volunteers to do HIV prevention among young people based on the peer-to-peer approach OUR PARTNERS IN PSKOV REGION: Pskov State University Pskov Polytechnic, Volunteer Team “INDIGO” Pskov Medical College, Volunteer Team “Kind Hearts” STAFF OF THE CENTRE FOR MEDICAL PREVENTION VOLUNTEER CAMP “HIV PREVENTION AMONG YOUNG PEOPLE” (11-13 SEPTEMBER 2017), 33 PEOPLE The camp participants received certificates and started a regional volunteer school (2017/2018) https://vk.com/club51940174 SKILLS PRACTICING “HIV PREVENTION AMONG YOUNG PEOPLE” 70 classes, 1,400 people covered Pskov Polytechnic 42 classes held, coverage - 772 people Pskov
    [Show full text]
  • BR IFIC N° 2654 Index/Indice
    BR IFIC N° 2654 Index/Indice International Frequency Information Circular (Terrestrial Services) ITU - Radiocommunication Bureau Circular Internacional de Información sobre Frecuencias (Servicios Terrenales) UIT - Oficina de Radiocomunicaciones Circulaire Internationale d'Information sur les Fréquences (Services de Terre) UIT - Bureau des Radiocommunications Part 1 / Partie 1 / Parte 1 Date/Fecha 06.10.2009 Description of Columns Description des colonnes Descripción de columnas No. Sequential number Numéro séquenciel Número sequencial BR Id. BR identification number Numéro d'identification du BR Número de identificación de la BR Adm Notifying Administration Administration notificatrice Administración notificante 1A [MHz] Assigned frequency [MHz] Fréquence assignée [MHz] Frecuencia asignada [MHz] Name of the location of Nom de l'emplacement de Nombre del emplazamiento de 4A/5A transmitting / receiving station la station d'émission / réception estación transmisora / receptora 4B/5B Geographical area Zone géographique Zona geográfica 4C/5C Geographical coordinates Coordonnées géographiques Coordenadas geográficas 6A Class of station Classe de station Clase de estación Purpose of the notification: Objet de la notification: Propósito de la notificación: Intent ADD-addition MOD-modify ADD-ajouter MOD-modifier ADD-añadir MOD-modificar SUP-suppress W/D-withdraw SUP-supprimer W/D-retirer SUP-suprimir W/D-retirar No. BR Id Adm 1A [MHz] 4A/5A 4B/5B 4C/5C 6A Part Intent 1 109078651 ARG 7233.0000 PICHANAL ARG 64W13'34'' 23S19'09'' FX 1 ADD 2 109078654
    [Show full text]
  • Zarasai, Litnuania [email protected] DATE LOCATION ACTIVITY CHAIN of COMMAND 163
    162 290. INFANTtRIE-DIVISION - UNIT HISTORY LOCATION ACTIVITY CHAIN OF COMMAND 1940/02/01 Tr.Ueb.Pl. monster, Wenrkreis X, Activation (8. Welle), Subordinate to: Stellv.Gen.Kdo. X, 1940/02/01-1940/05/16 Soltau, Fallingbostel, iibstorf, formation, training C.O.: Gen.Lt. Max uennerlein, 1940/02/06-1940/06/09 Schneveraingen, Bergen, WenrKr. XI (source: situation maps of Lage West ana general officer personnel files) 1940/05/10 Operational readiness 1940/05/14 Schnee citei Transfer Subordinate to: AK 38, 1940/05/17-1940/05/20 1940/05/19 Reuland, Weisstoampach, Saint- Movement AK 42, 1940/05/21-1940/05/23 Hubert, Libin, Gedinne, Belgium 1940/05/24 Kevin, Any, Origny-en-Thieracne, Movement, AK 38, 1940/05/24 Vervins, Sains- Ricnauinont, offensive engagements AK 42, 1940/05/25-1940/06/02 Saint-^uentin, Venaeuil, Laon, AK 18, 1940/06/03-1940/07/08 Oise-Aisne Canal, Soissons, wezy, Chateau-Tiiierry, Nangis, Montargis, CoO.: Gen.Lt. Theodor Frhr. von Wrede, 1940/06/08-1942/07/01 Bieneau, Gien, France 1940/00/21 Bieneau, Gien Offensive engagements 1940/07/01 Cnateauoriant, La Baule, Blois, Coastal defense, 1940/10/10 Neung, Vivy, floyetut, Anders, security, Saint-i>iazaire, Nantes occupation duty, training (no records for I940/0o/21-l941/01/31, source: situation maps of Lage West) 1941/02/01 La iiaule, Cnateaubriant, Nantes Coastal defense, security Subordinate to: AK 25, 1941/02/01-1941/02/28 1941/02/25 Gruuziadz, Poland Transfer, training AK 1, 1941/03/01-1941/03/15 AK 2, 1941/03/16-1941/03/31 1941/04/08 Elbing, Wormditt (Orneta), Movement, AK
    [Show full text]