Draft Environmental Impact Report No. 7896 Kamm Avenue Pistachio Processing Plant
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
PREPARED FOR: DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL County of Fresno IMPACT REPORT NO. 7896 Department of Public Works and Planning 2220 Tulare St., 6th Floor Fresno, CA 93721 Kamm Avenue Pistachio PREPARED BY: Processing Plant Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 113 N. Church Street, Suite 302 Visalia, CA 93291 February 2021 Draft Environmental Impact Report No. 7896 Kamm Avenue Pistachio Processing Plant Prepared for: County of Fresno Department of Public Works and Planning 2220 Tulare St., 6th Floor Fresno, CA 93721 Contact: David Randall, Senior Planner Prepared by: Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 113 N. Church Street, Suite 302 Visalia, CA 93291 (559) 840-4414 Contact: Travis Crawford, AICP February 2021 Project Reference No. 035-2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES-1 CHAPTER ONE - INTRODUCTION 1-1 1.1 Purpose of the EIR 1-1 1.2 Type of EIR 1-2 1.3 Intended Uses of the EIR 1-2 1.4 Known Responsible and Trustee Agencies 1-3 1.5 Environmental Review Process 1-3 1.6 Organization and Scope 1-5 CHAPTER TWO – PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2-1 2.1 Project Location and Setting 2-1 2.2 Project Description 2-7 2.3 Project Objectives 2-25 2.4 Other Required Approvals 2-26 CHAPTER THREE – ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 3.1 Aesthetics 3.1-1 3.3 Agriculture and Forestry Resources 3.2-1 3.3 Air Quality 3.3-1 3.4 Biological Resources 3.4-1 3.5 Cultural Resources 3.5-1 3.6 Energy 3.6-1 3.7 Geology and Soils 3.7-1 3.8 Greenhouse Gases / Climate Change 3.8-1 3.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials 3.9-1 3.10 Hydrology and Water Quality 3.10-1 3.11 Land Use and Planning 3.11-1 3.12 Mineral Resources 3.12-1 3.13 Noise 3.13-1 3.14 Population and Housing 3.14-1 3.15 Public Services 3.15-1 3.16 Recreation 3.16-1 3.17 Transportation / Traffic 3.17-1 3.18 Tribal Cultural Resources 3.18-1 3.19 Utilities and Service Systems 3.19-1 3.20 Wildfire 3.20-1 CHAPTER FOUR – ALTERNATIVES 4-1 CHAPTER FIVE – OTHER CEQA REQUIREMENTS 5-1 CHAPTER SIX – LIST OF PREPARERS 6-1 LIST OF FIGURES 2-1 – Regional Aerial Map 2-3 2-2 – Site Aerial Map 2-4 2-3 – Location Map 2-5 2-4 – Fresno County Zoning Map 2-6 2-5 – Potential Natural Gas Alignments 2-12 2-6 – Existing Aqueduct and Water Distribution Line Map 2-14 2-7 – Regional Growers Contracting to Supply Water 2-15 2-8 – Project Irrigation Water Application Locations 2-20 2-9 – Solid Materials Management Site Location 2-21 2-6 – Existing Aqueduct and Water Distribution Line Map 2-14 2-6 – Existing Aqueduct and Water Distribution Line Map 2-14 3.4-1 Biological Study Area Map 3.4-5 3.8-1 Observed and Projected Temperatures for Climate Change in the Project Area 3.8-4 3.8-2 Greenhouse Gas Emission Trends 3.8-10 3.8-3 Greenhouse Gas Emission Trends by Scoping Plan Category in California 3.8-11 3.8-4 California’s Path to Achieving the 2050 Targets 3.8-59 3.10-1 Existing Aqueduct and Water Distribution Line 3.10-20 3.10-2 Regional Growers Contracting to Supply Project Water 3.10-22 3.10-3 Project Irrigation Water Application Locations 3.10-26 3.10-4 FEMA Floodplain Map 3.10-22 3.13-1 Project Vicinity and Ambient Noise Monitoring Sites 3.13-15 3.13-2 Locations of Modeled Traffic Noise Receptors 3.13-19 LIST OF TABLES Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ES-5 2-1 Full Time and Seasonal Employees 2-11 2-2 Regional Growers Contracting to Supply Project Water APN and Acreage 2-16 2-3 Estimated Annual Water Demand for the Project 2-18 2-4 Solid Materials Produced by the Project, Pounds per Year 2-19 2-5 Maximum Number of One-Way Trips per Day by Season 2-23 3.3-1 Air Quality Monitoring Summary 3.3-3 3.3-2 Air Quality Index and Health Effects from Ozone 3.3-5 3.3-3 Air Quality Index and Health Effects of Particulate Pollution 3.3-7 3.3-4 San Joaquin Valley Air Basin Attainment Status 3.3-9 3.3-5 Construction Air Pollutant Emissions (Annual) 3.3-27 3.3-6 Operational Air Pollutant Emissions (2021) 3.3-28 3.3-7 Operational Permitted Air Pollutant Emissions (2021) 3.3-30 3.3-8 Maximum Daily Air Pollutant Emissions During Construction (Unmitigated) 3.3-35 3.3-9 Maximum Daily Air Pollutant Emissions During Operations (2021) 3.3-35 3.3-10 Prioritization Tool Health Risk Screening Results 3.3-37 3.3-11 Screening Levels for Potential Odor Sources 3.3-40 3.6-1 Electricity Consumption in Fresno County 2009 - 2019 3.6-2 3.6-2 Natural Gas Consumption in Fresno County 2009 - 2019 3.6-3 3.6-3 Construction Energy Consumption 3.6-13 3.6-4 Operational Energy Consumption 3.6-17 3.8-1 Description of Greenhouse Gases 3.8-7 3.8-2 Stationary Source Greenhouse Gas Emissions 3.8-41 3.8-3 Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions 3.8-42 3.8-4 Reductions from Greenhouse Gas Regulations 3.8-44 3.8-5 Project Operational Greenhouse Gases (2021) 3.8-46 3.8-6 Project Operational Greenhouse Gases (2030) 3.8-48 3.8-7 2017 Scoping Plan Update Estimated Change in GHG Emissions by Sector 3.8-50 3.8-8 Project Consistency with Scoping Plan 3.8-53 3.8-9 Consistency with SB 32 2017 Scoping Plan Update 3.8-61 3.10-1 Existing Runoff 3.10-10 3.10-2 Proposed Project Runoff 3.10-11 3.10-3 Regional Growers Contracting to Supply Project Water 3.10-21 3.10-4 Estimated Annual Water Demand for the Project 3.10-24 3.11-1 General Plan Consistency Analysis 3.11-5 3.13-1 Representative Environmental Noise Levels 3.13-2 3.13-2 Human Response to Different Levels of Groundborne Vibration 3.13-5 3.13-3 Construction Vibration Damage Criteria 3.13-6 3.13-4 Fresno County Lan Use Compatibility Noise Exposure 3.13-9 3.13-5 Exterior Noise Level Standards 3.13-10 3.13-6 Guideline Vibration Annoyance Potential Criteria 3.13-11 3.13-7 Guideline Vibration Damage Potential Threshold Criteria 3.13-11 3.13-8 Summary of 24 Hour Noise Level Measurements 3.13-14 3.13-9 Summary of Short-Term Noise Measurement Data 3.13-15 3.13-10 Typical Construction Equipment 3.13-17 3.13-11 Project-related Increases in Traffic Noise 3.13-18 3.13-12 Typical Vibration Levels During Construction 3.13-21 3.17-1 Existing Intersection LOS Results 3.17-8 3.17-2 Existing Segment LOS 3.17-8 3.17-3 Project Trip Generation 3.17-9 3.17-4 Existing Plus Project Intersection LOS Results 3.17-10 3.17-5 Existing Plus Project Segment LOS Results 3.17-10 3.17-6 Near Term Year 2025 Plus Project Intersection LOS Results 3.17-11 3.17-7 Near Term Year 2025 Plus Project Segment LOS Results 3.17-11 3.17-8 Cumulative Year 2040 Plus Project Intersection LOS Results 3.17-12 3.17-9 Cumulative Year 2040 Plus Project Segment LOS Results 3.17-12 3.19-1 Solid Materials Produced by the Project, Pounds per Year 3.19-17 4-1 Alternatives Potential Impact Analysis 4-7 APPENDICES Appendix A – Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis Report Appendix B – Biological Analysis Report Appendix C – Cultural Resources Survey and Report Appendix D – Energy Analysis Appendix E – Geotechnical Feasibility Report Appendix F – Hydrology and Water Quality Analysis Appendix G – Water Supply Analysis Appendix H – Noise Assessment Appendix I – Traffic Impact Analysis Report Executive Summary Kamm Avenue Pistachio Processing Plant EIR No. 7896 | Executive Summary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction This Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been prepared consistent with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Its intent is to inform the public, regulatory agencies and the County of Fresno decision makers of the potential environmental impacts the proposed Project would have on environmental factors as specified in the CEQA Guidelines. This EIR, in its entirety, addresses and discloses potential environmental effects associated with construction and operation of the proposed Project, including direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts to the environmental resources identified in the CEQA Guidelines environmental checklist. The County of Fresno is the “Lead Agency” pursuant to CEQA and is responsible for the preparation and distribution of the EIR. CEQA Process A Notice of Preparation (NOP) was prepared by the County for the proposed Project. The NOP was properly noticed and circulated pursuant to CEQA Guidelines for public review from September 14, 2020 – November 2, 2020. Scoping meetings were held on September 28, 2020 and October 19, 2020. The next step in the process is circulation of this EIR which will be distributed to the public for review and comment for at least 45 days. This EIR is organized as follows: Executive Summary: Summarizes the analysis contained in the EIR. Chapter 1 – Introduction: Provides a brief introduction to CEQA and the scope/contents of the DEIR. Chapter 2 – Project Description: Describes the Project in detail. Includes Project location, objectives, environmental setting and regulatory context.