DOCSLIB.ORG

7:4 Napoleon's Empire Collapses

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
7:4 Napoleon's Empire Collapses 7:4 Napoleon’s Empire Collapses Guided Reading & Section Assessment Questions Name: ______________________ Read p. 234-237. As you read about Napoleon’s downfall, write notes in the chart below to explain how each action contributed to his final defeat. *** Also, look for Napoleon’s mistakes (See first Section Assessment question on next page of this packet). 1) Ordered a blockade to prevent trade & communication between º Great Britain and other European nations. 2) Sent an army to invade Portugal & began the Peninsular War º 3) In June 1812, invaded Russia with his Grand Army º 4) Entered Moscow on September 14, 1812, and stayed in the ruined city for 5 º weeks 5) Raised another army & fought the Battle of Leipzig º 6) Escaped Elba, reclaimed title of emperor, and fought Battle of Waterloo º 7) & 8) Briefly and accurately describe the final defeat of Napoleon using the terms Hundred Days & Waterloo. ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ Section Assessment Questions As you read, or go back over what you read, complete the chart below, and then answer the question. Napoleon’s Mistakes Effect on Empire Blockade British blockade hurt the French Invasion of Spain 9) Invasion of Russia 10) 11 & 12) Which of Napoleon’s mistakes (listed above) was the most serious? Why? ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ After you have read and completed the charts in this packet so far, you should be able to answer the following without looking at the book. Try it. If you can’t, go back and look for the answer within the reading. 13) How did Great Britain combat Napoleon’s naval blockade? 14) Why did Napoleon have trouble fighting the enemy forces in the Peninsular War? 15) Why was Napoleon’s delay of the retreat from Moscow such a great blunder? 16) Why did people in other countries resist Napoleon’s efforts to build an empire? 17-18) Napoleon had no choice but to invade Russia. Do you agree with this statement? Why or why not? 19-20) Do you think that Napoleon was a great leader? Explain. ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Age of Napoleon & the Triumph of Romanticism Chapter 20
    The Age of Napoleon & the Triumph of Romanticism Chapter 20 The Rise of Napoleon - Chief danger to the Directory came from royalists o Émigrés returned to France o Spring 1797 – royalists won elections o To preserve the Republic . Directory staged a coup d’etat (Sept. 4, 1797) Placed their supporters back in power - Napoleon o Born 1769 on the island of Corsica . Went to French schools . Pursued military career 1785 – artillery officer . favored the revolution was a fiery Jacobin . 1793- General - Early military victories o Crushed Austria and Sardinia in Italy . Made Treaty of Camp Formino in Oct 1797 on his own accord Returned to France a hero - Britain . Only remaining enemy Too risky to cross channel o Chose to attack in Egypt . Wanted to cut off English trade and communication with India Failure - Russia Alarmed . 2nd coalition formed in 1799 Russia, Ottomans, Austria, Britain o Beat French in Italy and Switzerland 1 Constitution Year VII - Economic troubles and international situation o Directory lost support o Abbe Sieyes, proposed a new constitution . Wanted a strong executive Would require another coup d’etat o October 1799 . Napoleon left army in Egypt November 10, 1799 o Successful coup Napoleon issued the Constitution in December (Year VIII) o First Consul The Consulate in France (1799-1804) - Closed the French Revolution - Achieved wealth and property opportunities o Napoleon’s constitution was voted in overwhelmingly - Napoleon made peace with French enemies o 1801 Treaty of Luneville – took Austria out of war o 1802 Treaty of Amiens – peace with Britain o Peace at home . Employed all political factions (if they were loyal) .
    [Show full text]
  • Waterloo in Myth and Memory: the Battles of Waterloo 1815-1915 Timothy Fitzpatrick
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2013 Waterloo in Myth and Memory: The Battles of Waterloo 1815-1915 Timothy Fitzpatrick Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES WATERLOO IN MYTH AND MEMORY: THE BATTLES OF WATERLOO 1815-1915 By TIMOTHY FITZPATRICK A Dissertation submitted to the Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Fall Semester, 2013 Timothy Fitzpatrick defended this dissertation on November 6, 2013. The members of the supervisory committee were: Rafe Blaufarb Professor Directing Dissertation Amiée Boutin University Representative James P. Jones Committee Member Michael Creswell Committee Member Jonathan Grant Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members, and certifies that the dissertation has been approved in accordance with university requirements. ii For my Family iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank Drs. Rafe Blaufarb, Aimée Boutin, Michael Creswell, Jonathan Grant and James P. Jones for being on my committee. They have been wonderful mentors during my time at Florida State University. I would also like to thank Dr. Donald Howard for bringing me to FSU. Without Dr. Blaufarb’s and Dr. Horward’s help this project would not have been possible. Dr. Ben Wieder supported my research through various scholarships and grants. I would like to thank The Institute on Napoleon and French Revolution professors, students and alumni for our discussions, interaction and support of this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Peninsular War (1808)
    Napoleon’s Empire Collapses Napoleon Overreaches French Empire at its height THREE key strategic mistakes follow MISTAKE #1 - Blockades After loss at Trafalgar Napoleon is stuck: Cannot invade Britain. GB emerging as important center of Industry in Europe Napoleon uses economic warfare The Continental System Blockade of all continental European ports Forbade all nations from trade & communication with Britain Dual purpose: Make Europe more self-sufficient Destroy GB’s commercial & industrial economy Blockades Continental System “leaks” Smugglers (aided by GB) get through Other European nations disregard Orders in Council – British (with stronger navy) blockade French ports & forbade nations from trade with France Force ships bound for France to stop & be searched in GB first This included U.S. ships Blockades Impressment? England didn’t have conscription Impressment was upheld by British courts to ensure stability of British forces. The impressment of Americans caused tension between Britain and the US…leading to…? In 1814, Britain ended the practice, and never resumed it (after defeating Napoleon). MISTAKE #2 The Peninsular War (1808) Portugal refused to participate in Continental Blockade… Napoleon sends troops across Spain to attack Portugal, causing protest Napoleon removes king of Spain & installs his brother as king more anger Spanish also worried he would attack the Church & weaken it (as he had in France) The Peninsular War (1808 - 1814) Spanish fight as guerrillas—small groups that attacked and then
    [Show full text]
  • CORVISART, HIS LIFE and WORKS* by B
    CORVISART, HIS LIFE AND WORKS* By B. BARKER BEESON, M.D. CHICAGO, ILL. 1 0 EAN NICOLAS CORVISART JHis lather became very angry at this was born February 15, 1775, in/ decision and literally kicked him out the tiny village of Dricourt, of the paternal home. Without means not far from Vouziers, then a or influence Corvisart sought refuge part of the Champagne but nowin Hotcl-Dieu, the oldest hospital of includedJ in the Ardennes Department. Paris, where in return for acting as One writer has added the suffix des an ordinary nurse he was given board, Marets to his name. At any rate lodging and most important of all, the family was an old one and could an opportunity to study medicine. By be traced back to 870 a .d . It was his vigilance, zeal and gaiety he soon ennobled in 1669, in the person of became a favorite with both the Philip de Corvisart, Lord of Fleury. physicians and the patients. Antoine Owing to strife between the magis- Petit, Louis, Bucquet, Vicq-d’Azyr, trates and the French clergy, Parlia- Desault, Desbois de Rochefort and ment had been exiled from Paris. Portal were among his teachers. Corvi- So the elder Corvisart left with his sart frequently prepared the material fellows and settled temporarily in for their demonstrations. While doing Dricourt, returning to Paris soon after so, on one occasion he suffered a slight the birth of his son. The father was wound of a finger. Infection set in possessed of considerable means most and only the skillful and devoted of which was wasted on inferior care of Desault saved him.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from the British Paper Pound, 1797-1821 ∗
    Fiscal Sustainability and the Value of Money: Lessons from the British Paper Pound, 1797-1821 ∗ Pamfili Antipa y Banque de France July 2014 Preliminary Abstract This article explores the determinants of price level fluctuations in Britain during the first suspension of the gold standard over the 1797-1821 period. I find that the contemporary price level was determined by world gold prices and expectations regarding the resumption of the gold standard at the pre-war parity. As the latter hinged on market participants’ expectations concerning the financial burden of the Napoleonic Wars, my contribution establishes the importance of fiscal factors for the determination of the price level. Keywords: Fiscal Theory of the Price Level, debt monetization, structural breaks. JEL: N13, N23, N43, C22. ∗The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Banque de France. All remaining errors are mine. I thank Robert Barsky, Jean Barthelemy, Vincent Bignon, Michael Bordo, Carlos Carvalho, Christophe Chamley, Rui Esteves, Pierre-Cyrille Hautcoeur, Christian Hellwig, Julien Matheron, Christopher Meissner, Eric Mengus, Benoit Mojon, Kim Oosterlinck, Xavier Ragot, Annukka Ristiniemi, Albrecht Ritschl, Pierre Sicsic, André Strauss, François R. Velde, and Eugene White for their very helpful comments. I am also grateful to seminar participants at the 2013 European Historical Economics Society Conference and the Florence FRESH meeting. ypamfi[email protected] 1 1 Introduction The first suspension of the gold standard in Britain from 1797 to 1821 - an episode known as the Restriction Period - is at the origin of monetary economics. Over the 1797-1821 Restriction Period, Britain under George III suspended the convertibility of Bank of England notes into gold in order to finance the Napoleonic Wars.
    [Show full text]
  • 23 RETEACHING ACTIVITY Napoleon's Empire Collapses
    wh10a-IDR-0523_P24 11/25/2003 11:35 AM Page 71 Name Date CHAPTER 23 RETEACHING ACTIVITY Napoleon’s Empire Collapses Section 4 Multiple Choice Choose the best answer for each item. Write the letter of your answer in the blank. ____ 1. The main reason Napoleon divorced ____ 5. The Russian practice of burning fields and Josephine and married Marie Louise of slaughtering livestock to prevent invading Austria was because French troops from having access to them a. Josephine interfered with his decisions was called as emperor. a. guerrilla warfare. b. he was seeking a male heir to the b. slash-and-burn. throne. c. the scorched-earth policy. c. he wanted an alliance with Austria. d. the Continental System. d. Marie Louise was a grandniece of ____ 6. All of the following were factors in Marie Antoinette. Napoleon’s downfall except ____ 2. To prevent trade and communication a. his invasion of Russia in 1812. between Great Britain and other b. his use of the Continental System. European nations, Napoleon set up c. his war with Spain. a. a plebiscite. d. the Battle of Waterloo. b. a boycott. ____ 7. The Battle of Waterloo was between the c. an embargo. French and da blockade. a. the British. ____ 3. Napoleon’s policy called the Continental b. the British and the Spanish. System was created to c. the British and the Prussians. a. make continental Europe more self- d. the British and the Austrians. sufficient. ____ 8. The Hundred Days refers to b. make trade between Europe and other a.
    [Show full text]
  • Napoleon Bonaparte: His Successes and Failures
    ISSN 2414-8385 (Online) European Journal of September-December 2017 ISSN 2414-8377 (Print Multidisciplinary Studies Volume 2, Issue 7 Napoleon Bonaparte: His Successes and Failures Zakia Sultana Assist. Prof., School of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences, University of Information Technology and Sciences (UITS), Baridhara, Dhaka, Bangladesh Abstract Napoleon Bonaparte (1769-1821), also known as Napoleon I, was a French military leader and emperor who conquered much of Europe in the early 19th century. Born on the island of Corsica, Napoleon rapidly rose through the ranks of the military during the French Revolution (1789-1799). After seizing political power in France in a 1799 coup d’état, he crowned himself emperor in 1804. Shrewd, ambitious and a skilled military strategist, Napoleon successfully waged war against various coalitions of European nations and expanded his empire. However, after a disastrous French invasion of Russia in 1812, Napoleon abdicated the throne two years later and was exiled to the island of Elba. In 1815, he briefly returned to power in his Hundred Days campaign. After a crushing defeat at the Battle of Waterloo, he abdicated once again and was exiled to the remote island of Saint Helena, where he died at 51.Napoleon was responsible for spreading the values of the French Revolution to other countries, especially in legal reform and the abolition of serfdom. After the fall of Napoleon, not only was the Napoleonic Code retained by conquered countries including the Netherlands, Belgium, parts of Italy and Germany, but has been used as the basis of certain parts of law outside Europe including the Dominican Republic, the US state of Louisiana and the Canadian province of Quebec.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 149 H-France Review Vol. 9 (March 2009), No. 38 John G
    H-France Review Volume 9 (2009) Page 149 H-France Review Vol. 9 (March 2009), No. 38 John G. Gallaher, Napoleon’s Enfant Terrible: General Dominique Vandamme. Norman, Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press, 2008. 362 pp. Illustrations, maps, bibliography, and index. $34.95 U. S. (hb). ISBN 978-0-8061-3875-6. Review by Ralph Ashby, Eastern Illinois University. John G. Gallaher begins his study of General Vandamme boldly stating that, “Dominique-Joseph-René Vandamme, count of Unsebourg, was the General George Patton of the Napoleonic army” (p. 3). Gallaher’s book amply shows that in fact Vandamme was ultimately rather less successful and probably less brilliant than the controversial American general, but that is not the point of the analogy. Other than providing a point of reference for a portion of the reading audience, Gallaher sets up Vandamme’s personality: rebellious, ambitious, egotistical, and difficult. Gallaher’s interest in Vandamme originally began with a study of the 1813 campaign in Germany and the French defeat at Kulm in that campaign (p. xii). Readers should well note from the start that Gallaher is not a biographer. He is a military historian of the Napoleonic period, and a very accomplished one at that. Gallaher has used the approach of military biography before, most notably with his excellent study of Louis-Nicolas Davout some thirty years ago. Gallaher’s approach to Vandamme’s life is essentially a very straightforward military study. Gallaher explores the general’s personality to the extent it impacted Vandamme’s military career, while personal biographical details are sketched in.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Conspiracy in Napoleonic France: the Malet Affair Kelly Diane Whittaker Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2007 Political conspiracy in Napoleonic France: the Malet affair Kelly Diane Whittaker Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Whittaker, Kelly Diane, "Political conspiracy in Napoleonic France: the Malet affair" (2007). LSU Master's Theses. 1437. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/1437 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. POLITICAL CONSPIRACY IN NAPOLEONIC FRANCE: THE MALET AFFAIR A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts In The Department of History by Kelly Diane Whittaker B.A., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2002 December, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract . iii Introduction . .1 Chapter One General Malet: A Biography . 8 Two Hopes and Disappointments in Napoleonic France . 46 Three General Malet’s Final Attempt, 22 October 1812 . 73 Conclusion . 95 Notes . .100 Bibliography . .112 Vita . 115 ii ABSTRACT The French Revolution ushered in a period of political unrest in France which appeared never-ending, even when a seemingly stable government rose to power. After a series of failed Republican governments, Napoleon Bonaparte seized control on 18 Brumaire VIII, promising to uphold the revolutionary ideals that had permeated the nation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hundred Days Offensive As a Case Study
    Library and Archives Canada PA-003399 Canada Archives Library and Armoured trucks of the Motor Machine Gun Brigade during the advance from Arras, September 1918. MEASURING THE SUCCESS OF CANADA’S WARS: THE HUNDRED DAYS OFFENSIVE AS A CASE STUDY by Ryan Goldsworthy Introduction divisions and cracked some of the most seemingly impenetra- ble German positions, the Canadian Corps suffered enormous uring the final three months of the First World losses. The Corps sustained over 45,000 casualties in a mere War, the Allies instigated a series of offensives three months of fighting, which was not only its highest casu- against Germany on the Western Front which alty rate of the entire war, but in the subsequent history of the would be known as the Hundred Days Canadian military.1 Offensive. In this offensive, the Canadian DCorps served as the spearhead for the British Empire, and effectively inflicted a series of decisive defeats upon the Ryan Goldsworthy is a graduate of both the University of Toronto (Hons German Army. “Canada’s Hundred Days,” so-called because BA) and Queen’s University (MA). During his graduate education, he specialized in Canada’s combative role in the First World War. He has of Canada’s prominent and substantial role in victory, began worked closely with a senior Royal Ontario Museum curator in the on 8 August 1918 with the battle of Amiens, and carried museum’s arms and armour collection. Currently, he is working as an through to the Battle of Mons on the date of the armistice, 11 editor of peer-reviewed articles at Queen’s, and he also serves in the November 1918.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Napoleon Bonaparte Reflections on the Bicentenary of His Death
    Working Paper 2021/18/TOM History Lessons: The Case of Napoleon Bonaparte Reflections on the Bicentenary of his Death Ludo Van der Heyden INSEAD, [email protected] April 26, 2021 In this article we reassess the myth of Napoleon Bonaparte, not so much from the standpoint of battles and conquests, but more from the point of view of justice, particularly procedural justice. This approach allows us to define the righteous leader as one who applies procedural justice. Using this concept, we aim to demonstrate that General Bonaparte could be considered as a just leader, although, in the guise of Emperor, he will be qualified here as the antithesis of that. The inevitable conclusion is that the Empire came to an end as a predictable consequence of Emperor Napoleon's unjust leadership. We recognize that the revolutionary aspirations of Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité were in themselves noble, but that they required for their implementation a system of procedural justice central to the resolution of the inevitable tensions and contradictions that these precepts would generate. We conclude by highlighting and examining how the notion of procedural justice is vital to the proper functioning of the modern European Union. In contrast, the difficulties presented by Brexit, or the Trump presidency, can be seen as the tragic, but also predictable consequences of an unjust leadership. We revisit the urgent need for fair management and debate; debate that can only take place when guided by righteous leaders. The imperial failure was a consequence of the drift towards injustice in the management of Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Hobhouse and the Hundred Days
    116 The Hundred Days, March 11th-July 24th 1815 The Hundred Days March 11th-July 24th 1815 Edited from B.L.Add.Mss. 47232, and Berg Collection Volumes 2, 3 and 4: Broughton Holograph Diaries, Henry W. and Albert A. Berg Collection, The New York Public Library, Astor, Lenox and Tilden Foundations. Saturday March 11th 1815: Received this morning from my father the following letter: Lord Cochrane has escaped from prison1 – Bounaparte has escaped from Elba2 – I write this from the House of Commons and the intelligence in both cases seems to rest on good authority and is believed. Benjamin Hobhouse Both are certainly true. Cullen3 came down today and confirmed the whole of both. From the first I feel sure of Napoleon’s success. I received a letter [from] Lord John Townshend4 apologising for his rudeness, but annexing such comments as require a hint from me at the close of the controversy. Sunday March 12th 1815: Finish reading the Αυτοχεδιοι Ετοχασµοι of Coray.5 1: Thomas Cochrane, 10th Earl of Dundonald (1775-1860) admiral. Implicated unfairly in a financial scandal, he had been imprisoned by the establishment enemies he had made in his exposure of Admiralty corruption. He was recaptured (see below, 21 Mar 1815). He later became famous as the friend and naval assistant of Simon Bolivar. 2: Napoleon left Elba on March 26th. 3: Cullen was a lawyer friend of H., at Lincoln’s Inn. 4: Lord John Townshend. (1757-1833); H. has been planning to compete against his son as M.P. for Cambridge University, which has made discord for which Townshend has apologised.
    [Show full text]