CORVISART, HIS LIFE and WORKS* by B

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CORVISART, HIS LIFE and WORKS* by B CORVISART, HIS LIFE AND WORKS* By B. BARKER BEESON, M.D. CHICAGO, ILL. 1 0 EAN NICOLAS CORVISART JHis lather became very angry at this was born February 15, 1775, in/ decision and literally kicked him out the tiny village of Dricourt, of the paternal home. Without means not far from Vouziers, then a or influence Corvisart sought refuge part of the Champagne but nowin Hotcl-Dieu, the oldest hospital of includedJ in the Ardennes Department. Paris, where in return for acting as One writer has added the suffix des an ordinary nurse he was given board, Marets to his name. At any rate lodging and most important of all, the family was an old one and could an opportunity to study medicine. By be traced back to 870 a .d . It was his vigilance, zeal and gaiety he soon ennobled in 1669, in the person of became a favorite with both the Philip de Corvisart, Lord of Fleury. physicians and the patients. Antoine Owing to strife between the magis- Petit, Louis, Bucquet, Vicq-d’Azyr, trates and the French clergy, Parlia- Desault, Desbois de Rochefort and ment had been exiled from Paris. Portal were among his teachers. Corvi- So the elder Corvisart left with his sart frequently prepared the material fellows and settled temporarily in for their demonstrations. While doing Dricourt, returning to Paris soon after so, on one occasion he suffered a slight the birth of his son. The father was wound of a finger. Infection set in possessed of considerable means most and only the skillful and devoted of which was wasted on inferior care of Desault saved him. paintings. For reasons of economy Although the youngest in his class the subject of this sketch was sent Corvisart stood first. His inaugural early to live with an uncle, the parish thesis (1782) was entitled, “Is pleth- priest at Vimille, a village adjacent ora sufficient to produce the menstrual to Bou'Iogne-sur-Mer. When thirteen evacuation?.” Three years later the years old he entered the College degree of Doctor-regent was conferred of Saint-Barbe where he proved to upon him by the Paris Faculty of be a lazy, mischievous and quarrel- Medicine and as was the custom he some pupil, showing no signs of future delivered a discourse. It dealt with greatness. Instead he devoted him- the pleasures of medical study and the self to outdoor sports. Originally in- disappointments of medical practice. tended for the bar he spent some time, Bourdois de Lamotte says that the most reluctantly, in the study of law. degree of Doctor-regent was obtained Helme tells of Corvisart’s visits to only after four years of study plus several medical clinics in Paris and of two additional years devoted largely the profound impression made upon to rigorous examinations. What was him by the eloquence of Antoine expected of the candidate was out Petit. He at once cast aside Justinian of all proportion to what he had been and his Codes and decided to enroll taught, so a great deal of self-educa- under the banner of Aesculapius. tion was essential. The new Doctor- *Read at a Joint Meeting of the Society of Medical History of Chicago and the Institute of Medicine, January 25, 1929. regent, in accordance with usage, ous of a hospital connection but tendered a banquet to his teachers and refused a place in the new Necker fellows. When the festivities were well Hospital when Madame Necker in- under way Corvisart, according to sisted that he don a wig. He had Helme, could no longer converse save meanwhile contracted close friend- in Latin. Glass in hand and to the ships with Desbois de Rochefort and astonishment of all he suddenly burst Desault as well as with Father Poten- into the adjoining room where the tian, the Superior of the Charite professors were dining, hiccoughing Hospital. On the death of Desbois Horace, belching forth Juvenal, and in 1788, Corvisart was designated abruptly ending the banquet. to succeed him as physician to that Corvisart later became adjunct to hospital. From then on his reputation the chair of anatomy and took part grew steadily so that when the medical in the courses on operative surgery, school was created in 1795, he was obstetrics and physiology. He was unanimously chosen to occupy the also appointed physician to the poor chair of medicine. Two years later of the parish of Saint-Sulpice. In Corvisart was made Professor of the midst of this busy and useful Medicine at the College de France. career he was frequently obliged to In 1799 Barthez and he were made borrow money. His chief aim, even physicians to the Government. Later when distressed, was to live in order Corvisart was personal physician to to learn and to perfect himself by Bonaparte as First Consul and with experience. Corvisart was very desir- the advent of the First Empire he became chief physician to the Em- between Corvisart and Boyer, the peror, the Empress and the Court. surgeon, in the case of a patient with Corvisart was a member of the a gastric complaint, “It is a catarrh,” Academy of Sciences (1811) and of said Boyer. “No! it is a cancer,” re- the Academy of Medicine (1820). plied Corvisart, “Observe that leaden Napoleon created him a Baron of color and emaciation.” On another the Empire as well as an Officer of occasion along with Dubois, also a the Legion of Honor and a Com- surgeon and famous as the accoucheur mander of the Order of the Reunion. who delivered the King of Rome, Owing to the demands of the court Corvisart was examining the bladder and government, Corvisart resigned of an old senator who was stone deaf; his teaching positions in 1805 and so they spoke freely. “There is a was made professor emeritus. The calculus,” exclaimed Dubois, “like customary pension was, at his request, a small nut, round and solitary.” set aside for the founding of a prize “Fine,” said Corvisart, “and how open to competition among the medi- can you consider this insignificant cal students. The prize was won, in stone as the sole cause of what we see: 1848, by Corvisart’s nephew, Lucien this loss of weight this rapid weaken- Corvisart who afterwards became ing of all the organs. Look further, physician to Napoleon in and as- you ought to find a fungous growth or sisted at the birth of the son of the an ulcer which could cause all of these latter’s wife, the ill-fated Prince symptoms and the calculus as well.” Imperial. Agreeing with this Dubois explored Lassus has emphasized Corvisart’s still more with a sound. Suddenly he critical sense, independence, powers stopped and exclaimed, “You are of observation and scepticism. He right! I find a soft fleshy growth chose his teachers particularly for which is your fungus.” their ability to impart information Upon seeing a certain portrait Corvi- to others, being especially attached sart exclaimed, “If the painter was to Desault, A. Petit, Desbois de exact the original of this portrait Rochefort and Bichat. Desbois is died of heart disease.” “And,” adds credited with doing much to make an Pariset, “he was correct.” Observa- observer of Corvisart for he held tion was termed by him the chief informal talks with his pupils in support of clinical medicine. Lassus which diagnosis and treatment were refers to Corvisart as the physician thoroughly discussed. Along with a physiognomist par excellence. On en- penchant for criticism Corvisart was tering a room and at a distance of endowed with common sense and several meters he often recognized the therefore his diagnoses which at times disorder present. His scepticism was seemed almost to be miraculous, shown by one of his favorite sayings, were really due in a large measure to ‘‘ That which we know is but little com- this combination. He was probably pared to that which we must learn.” the first to carry out and insist on Corvisart was scrupulously honest routine physical examinations, thus and never gossiped. Generous with paving the way for what is now the poor, he insisted on adequate fees customary. from the wealthy class. Even at the The story is told of a consultation zenith of his career he was often morose, melancholy and preoccupied. he excited the admiration of his He was courteous to physicians save pupils when practicing percussion at to some of the older ones whom he the bedside. termed Gothic and superannuated. Corvisart became greatly interested Marital difficulties and the death of an in percussion after reading a book on only son are said to have accounted it by the Viennese physician, Auen- for his attitude toward life in general. briigger (1760). He translated this Corvisart’s service at the Charite work into French in 1808. When it was a famous center of clinical teach- was suggested that he write his own ing during his ten years there. Those book on percussion Corvisart replied, who followed him through the wards “By doing that I would sacrifice in the forenoon, could go later to Auenbriigger to my own vanity, a the College de France and hear the thing I shall not do, for I wish to same cases discussed from the purely revive his splendid discovery.” theoretical standpoint. His genius in Corvisart realized the importance organization and imperious authority of percussion and emphasized it not resulted in a smoothly working organ- only in his practice but also in clinics ization with an almost military dis- and lectures. cipline. Dr. Reveille-Parise, then a In 1797 he translated from Latin medical student, attracted the atten- into French Max Stoll’s “Aph- tion of Corvisart one day at the orisms on the Knowledge and Cure Charite.
Recommended publications
  • The Age of Napoleon & the Triumph of Romanticism Chapter 20
    The Age of Napoleon & the Triumph of Romanticism Chapter 20 The Rise of Napoleon - Chief danger to the Directory came from royalists o Émigrés returned to France o Spring 1797 – royalists won elections o To preserve the Republic . Directory staged a coup d’etat (Sept. 4, 1797) Placed their supporters back in power - Napoleon o Born 1769 on the island of Corsica . Went to French schools . Pursued military career 1785 – artillery officer . favored the revolution was a fiery Jacobin . 1793- General - Early military victories o Crushed Austria and Sardinia in Italy . Made Treaty of Camp Formino in Oct 1797 on his own accord Returned to France a hero - Britain . Only remaining enemy Too risky to cross channel o Chose to attack in Egypt . Wanted to cut off English trade and communication with India Failure - Russia Alarmed . 2nd coalition formed in 1799 Russia, Ottomans, Austria, Britain o Beat French in Italy and Switzerland 1 Constitution Year VII - Economic troubles and international situation o Directory lost support o Abbe Sieyes, proposed a new constitution . Wanted a strong executive Would require another coup d’etat o October 1799 . Napoleon left army in Egypt November 10, 1799 o Successful coup Napoleon issued the Constitution in December (Year VIII) o First Consul The Consulate in France (1799-1804) - Closed the French Revolution - Achieved wealth and property opportunities o Napoleon’s constitution was voted in overwhelmingly - Napoleon made peace with French enemies o 1801 Treaty of Luneville – took Austria out of war o 1802 Treaty of Amiens – peace with Britain o Peace at home . Employed all political factions (if they were loyal) .
    [Show full text]
  • Waterloo in Myth and Memory: the Battles of Waterloo 1815-1915 Timothy Fitzpatrick
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2013 Waterloo in Myth and Memory: The Battles of Waterloo 1815-1915 Timothy Fitzpatrick Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES WATERLOO IN MYTH AND MEMORY: THE BATTLES OF WATERLOO 1815-1915 By TIMOTHY FITZPATRICK A Dissertation submitted to the Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Fall Semester, 2013 Timothy Fitzpatrick defended this dissertation on November 6, 2013. The members of the supervisory committee were: Rafe Blaufarb Professor Directing Dissertation Amiée Boutin University Representative James P. Jones Committee Member Michael Creswell Committee Member Jonathan Grant Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members, and certifies that the dissertation has been approved in accordance with university requirements. ii For my Family iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank Drs. Rafe Blaufarb, Aimée Boutin, Michael Creswell, Jonathan Grant and James P. Jones for being on my committee. They have been wonderful mentors during my time at Florida State University. I would also like to thank Dr. Donald Howard for bringing me to FSU. Without Dr. Blaufarb’s and Dr. Horward’s help this project would not have been possible. Dr. Ben Wieder supported my research through various scholarships and grants. I would like to thank The Institute on Napoleon and French Revolution professors, students and alumni for our discussions, interaction and support of this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Peninsular War (1808)
    Napoleon’s Empire Collapses Napoleon Overreaches French Empire at its height THREE key strategic mistakes follow MISTAKE #1 - Blockades After loss at Trafalgar Napoleon is stuck: Cannot invade Britain. GB emerging as important center of Industry in Europe Napoleon uses economic warfare The Continental System Blockade of all continental European ports Forbade all nations from trade & communication with Britain Dual purpose: Make Europe more self-sufficient Destroy GB’s commercial & industrial economy Blockades Continental System “leaks” Smugglers (aided by GB) get through Other European nations disregard Orders in Council – British (with stronger navy) blockade French ports & forbade nations from trade with France Force ships bound for France to stop & be searched in GB first This included U.S. ships Blockades Impressment? England didn’t have conscription Impressment was upheld by British courts to ensure stability of British forces. The impressment of Americans caused tension between Britain and the US…leading to…? In 1814, Britain ended the practice, and never resumed it (after defeating Napoleon). MISTAKE #2 The Peninsular War (1808) Portugal refused to participate in Continental Blockade… Napoleon sends troops across Spain to attack Portugal, causing protest Napoleon removes king of Spain & installs his brother as king more anger Spanish also worried he would attack the Church & weaken it (as he had in France) The Peninsular War (1808 - 1814) Spanish fight as guerrillas—small groups that attacked and then
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from the British Paper Pound, 1797-1821 ∗
    Fiscal Sustainability and the Value of Money: Lessons from the British Paper Pound, 1797-1821 ∗ Pamfili Antipa y Banque de France July 2014 Preliminary Abstract This article explores the determinants of price level fluctuations in Britain during the first suspension of the gold standard over the 1797-1821 period. I find that the contemporary price level was determined by world gold prices and expectations regarding the resumption of the gold standard at the pre-war parity. As the latter hinged on market participants’ expectations concerning the financial burden of the Napoleonic Wars, my contribution establishes the importance of fiscal factors for the determination of the price level. Keywords: Fiscal Theory of the Price Level, debt monetization, structural breaks. JEL: N13, N23, N43, C22. ∗The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Banque de France. All remaining errors are mine. I thank Robert Barsky, Jean Barthelemy, Vincent Bignon, Michael Bordo, Carlos Carvalho, Christophe Chamley, Rui Esteves, Pierre-Cyrille Hautcoeur, Christian Hellwig, Julien Matheron, Christopher Meissner, Eric Mengus, Benoit Mojon, Kim Oosterlinck, Xavier Ragot, Annukka Ristiniemi, Albrecht Ritschl, Pierre Sicsic, André Strauss, François R. Velde, and Eugene White for their very helpful comments. I am also grateful to seminar participants at the 2013 European Historical Economics Society Conference and the Florence FRESH meeting. ypamfi[email protected] 1 1 Introduction The first suspension of the gold standard in Britain from 1797 to 1821 - an episode known as the Restriction Period - is at the origin of monetary economics. Over the 1797-1821 Restriction Period, Britain under George III suspended the convertibility of Bank of England notes into gold in order to finance the Napoleonic Wars.
    [Show full text]
  • 23 RETEACHING ACTIVITY Napoleon's Empire Collapses
    wh10a-IDR-0523_P24 11/25/2003 11:35 AM Page 71 Name Date CHAPTER 23 RETEACHING ACTIVITY Napoleon’s Empire Collapses Section 4 Multiple Choice Choose the best answer for each item. Write the letter of your answer in the blank. ____ 1. The main reason Napoleon divorced ____ 5. The Russian practice of burning fields and Josephine and married Marie Louise of slaughtering livestock to prevent invading Austria was because French troops from having access to them a. Josephine interfered with his decisions was called as emperor. a. guerrilla warfare. b. he was seeking a male heir to the b. slash-and-burn. throne. c. the scorched-earth policy. c. he wanted an alliance with Austria. d. the Continental System. d. Marie Louise was a grandniece of ____ 6. All of the following were factors in Marie Antoinette. Napoleon’s downfall except ____ 2. To prevent trade and communication a. his invasion of Russia in 1812. between Great Britain and other b. his use of the Continental System. European nations, Napoleon set up c. his war with Spain. a. a plebiscite. d. the Battle of Waterloo. b. a boycott. ____ 7. The Battle of Waterloo was between the c. an embargo. French and da blockade. a. the British. ____ 3. Napoleon’s policy called the Continental b. the British and the Spanish. System was created to c. the British and the Prussians. a. make continental Europe more self- d. the British and the Austrians. sufficient. ____ 8. The Hundred Days refers to b. make trade between Europe and other a.
    [Show full text]
  • Napoleon Bonaparte: His Successes and Failures
    ISSN 2414-8385 (Online) European Journal of September-December 2017 ISSN 2414-8377 (Print Multidisciplinary Studies Volume 2, Issue 7 Napoleon Bonaparte: His Successes and Failures Zakia Sultana Assist. Prof., School of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences, University of Information Technology and Sciences (UITS), Baridhara, Dhaka, Bangladesh Abstract Napoleon Bonaparte (1769-1821), also known as Napoleon I, was a French military leader and emperor who conquered much of Europe in the early 19th century. Born on the island of Corsica, Napoleon rapidly rose through the ranks of the military during the French Revolution (1789-1799). After seizing political power in France in a 1799 coup d’état, he crowned himself emperor in 1804. Shrewd, ambitious and a skilled military strategist, Napoleon successfully waged war against various coalitions of European nations and expanded his empire. However, after a disastrous French invasion of Russia in 1812, Napoleon abdicated the throne two years later and was exiled to the island of Elba. In 1815, he briefly returned to power in his Hundred Days campaign. After a crushing defeat at the Battle of Waterloo, he abdicated once again and was exiled to the remote island of Saint Helena, where he died at 51.Napoleon was responsible for spreading the values of the French Revolution to other countries, especially in legal reform and the abolition of serfdom. After the fall of Napoleon, not only was the Napoleonic Code retained by conquered countries including the Netherlands, Belgium, parts of Italy and Germany, but has been used as the basis of certain parts of law outside Europe including the Dominican Republic, the US state of Louisiana and the Canadian province of Quebec.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 149 H-France Review Vol. 9 (March 2009), No. 38 John G
    H-France Review Volume 9 (2009) Page 149 H-France Review Vol. 9 (March 2009), No. 38 John G. Gallaher, Napoleon’s Enfant Terrible: General Dominique Vandamme. Norman, Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press, 2008. 362 pp. Illustrations, maps, bibliography, and index. $34.95 U. S. (hb). ISBN 978-0-8061-3875-6. Review by Ralph Ashby, Eastern Illinois University. John G. Gallaher begins his study of General Vandamme boldly stating that, “Dominique-Joseph-René Vandamme, count of Unsebourg, was the General George Patton of the Napoleonic army” (p. 3). Gallaher’s book amply shows that in fact Vandamme was ultimately rather less successful and probably less brilliant than the controversial American general, but that is not the point of the analogy. Other than providing a point of reference for a portion of the reading audience, Gallaher sets up Vandamme’s personality: rebellious, ambitious, egotistical, and difficult. Gallaher’s interest in Vandamme originally began with a study of the 1813 campaign in Germany and the French defeat at Kulm in that campaign (p. xii). Readers should well note from the start that Gallaher is not a biographer. He is a military historian of the Napoleonic period, and a very accomplished one at that. Gallaher has used the approach of military biography before, most notably with his excellent study of Louis-Nicolas Davout some thirty years ago. Gallaher’s approach to Vandamme’s life is essentially a very straightforward military study. Gallaher explores the general’s personality to the extent it impacted Vandamme’s military career, while personal biographical details are sketched in.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Conspiracy in Napoleonic France: the Malet Affair Kelly Diane Whittaker Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2007 Political conspiracy in Napoleonic France: the Malet affair Kelly Diane Whittaker Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Whittaker, Kelly Diane, "Political conspiracy in Napoleonic France: the Malet affair" (2007). LSU Master's Theses. 1437. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/1437 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. POLITICAL CONSPIRACY IN NAPOLEONIC FRANCE: THE MALET AFFAIR A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts In The Department of History by Kelly Diane Whittaker B.A., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2002 December, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract . iii Introduction . .1 Chapter One General Malet: A Biography . 8 Two Hopes and Disappointments in Napoleonic France . 46 Three General Malet’s Final Attempt, 22 October 1812 . 73 Conclusion . 95 Notes . .100 Bibliography . .112 Vita . 115 ii ABSTRACT The French Revolution ushered in a period of political unrest in France which appeared never-ending, even when a seemingly stable government rose to power. After a series of failed Republican governments, Napoleon Bonaparte seized control on 18 Brumaire VIII, promising to uphold the revolutionary ideals that had permeated the nation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hundred Days Offensive As a Case Study
    Library and Archives Canada PA-003399 Canada Archives Library and Armoured trucks of the Motor Machine Gun Brigade during the advance from Arras, September 1918. MEASURING THE SUCCESS OF CANADA’S WARS: THE HUNDRED DAYS OFFENSIVE AS A CASE STUDY by Ryan Goldsworthy Introduction divisions and cracked some of the most seemingly impenetra- ble German positions, the Canadian Corps suffered enormous uring the final three months of the First World losses. The Corps sustained over 45,000 casualties in a mere War, the Allies instigated a series of offensives three months of fighting, which was not only its highest casu- against Germany on the Western Front which alty rate of the entire war, but in the subsequent history of the would be known as the Hundred Days Canadian military.1 Offensive. In this offensive, the Canadian DCorps served as the spearhead for the British Empire, and effectively inflicted a series of decisive defeats upon the Ryan Goldsworthy is a graduate of both the University of Toronto (Hons German Army. “Canada’s Hundred Days,” so-called because BA) and Queen’s University (MA). During his graduate education, he specialized in Canada’s combative role in the First World War. He has of Canada’s prominent and substantial role in victory, began worked closely with a senior Royal Ontario Museum curator in the on 8 August 1918 with the battle of Amiens, and carried museum’s arms and armour collection. Currently, he is working as an through to the Battle of Mons on the date of the armistice, 11 editor of peer-reviewed articles at Queen’s, and he also serves in the November 1918.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Napoleon Bonaparte Reflections on the Bicentenary of His Death
    Working Paper 2021/18/TOM History Lessons: The Case of Napoleon Bonaparte Reflections on the Bicentenary of his Death Ludo Van der Heyden INSEAD, [email protected] April 26, 2021 In this article we reassess the myth of Napoleon Bonaparte, not so much from the standpoint of battles and conquests, but more from the point of view of justice, particularly procedural justice. This approach allows us to define the righteous leader as one who applies procedural justice. Using this concept, we aim to demonstrate that General Bonaparte could be considered as a just leader, although, in the guise of Emperor, he will be qualified here as the antithesis of that. The inevitable conclusion is that the Empire came to an end as a predictable consequence of Emperor Napoleon's unjust leadership. We recognize that the revolutionary aspirations of Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité were in themselves noble, but that they required for their implementation a system of procedural justice central to the resolution of the inevitable tensions and contradictions that these precepts would generate. We conclude by highlighting and examining how the notion of procedural justice is vital to the proper functioning of the modern European Union. In contrast, the difficulties presented by Brexit, or the Trump presidency, can be seen as the tragic, but also predictable consequences of an unjust leadership. We revisit the urgent need for fair management and debate; debate that can only take place when guided by righteous leaders. The imperial failure was a consequence of the drift towards injustice in the management of Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Hobhouse and the Hundred Days
    116 The Hundred Days, March 11th-July 24th 1815 The Hundred Days March 11th-July 24th 1815 Edited from B.L.Add.Mss. 47232, and Berg Collection Volumes 2, 3 and 4: Broughton Holograph Diaries, Henry W. and Albert A. Berg Collection, The New York Public Library, Astor, Lenox and Tilden Foundations. Saturday March 11th 1815: Received this morning from my father the following letter: Lord Cochrane has escaped from prison1 – Bounaparte has escaped from Elba2 – I write this from the House of Commons and the intelligence in both cases seems to rest on good authority and is believed. Benjamin Hobhouse Both are certainly true. Cullen3 came down today and confirmed the whole of both. From the first I feel sure of Napoleon’s success. I received a letter [from] Lord John Townshend4 apologising for his rudeness, but annexing such comments as require a hint from me at the close of the controversy. Sunday March 12th 1815: Finish reading the Αυτοχεδιοι Ετοχασµοι of Coray.5 1: Thomas Cochrane, 10th Earl of Dundonald (1775-1860) admiral. Implicated unfairly in a financial scandal, he had been imprisoned by the establishment enemies he had made in his exposure of Admiralty corruption. He was recaptured (see below, 21 Mar 1815). He later became famous as the friend and naval assistant of Simon Bolivar. 2: Napoleon left Elba on March 26th. 3: Cullen was a lawyer friend of H., at Lincoln’s Inn. 4: Lord John Townshend. (1757-1833); H. has been planning to compete against his son as M.P. for Cambridge University, which has made discord for which Townshend has apologised.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lion's Pride
    Spring 2019 Volume 12 The Lion’s Pride A Publication Showcasing Student Creativity Lake Washington Institute of Technology Kirkland, Washington The Lion’s Pride Committee Cole Galino Karen Holum Wes Mantooth Elisa Parrett Rochelle Schimke Sue Wozniak The Lion’s Pride seeks to showcase the creative work of our diverse students and programs of study at Lake Washington Institute of Technology. Please consider submitting your creative work for consideration. For details, please visit the publication homepage: http://www.lwtech.edu/lp You may also contact [email protected] if you have questions. Notes on This Publication: Members of the Lion’s Pride committee may make minor edits to submissions in order to standardize spelling, grammar, punctuation, and formatting. However, committee members do not thoroughly edit submissions for students, and the committee’s general policy is to present work in close to its submitted form to preserve the integrity of each student’s voice. Students are encouraged to edit their own work carefully before submission and to get assistance from instructors and campus tutors. The Lion’s Pride may contain links to third-party web sites. These links are provided as a convenience to readers and are not under the control of The Lion’s Pride. If you access a third-party site linked to The Lion’s Pride publication, you are responsible for guarding against computer viruses or other potential risks of online navigation. The Lion’s Pride cannot guarantee the accuracy and completeness of such links and does not endorse information contained at the third-party web sites.
    [Show full text]