DOCSLIB.ORG

NATIONAL TRUST of AUSTRALIA (NSW) CLASSIFICATION and CRITERIA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NATIONAL TRUST of AUSTRALIA (NSW) CLASSIFICATION and CRITERIA NATIONAL TRUST OF AUSTRALIA (NSW) CLASSIFICATION and CRITERIA RESEARCH , ISSUE ANALYSIS AND POLICY DEVELOPMENT for recommendation to The National Trust of Australia (NSW) Submitted as Part of the Requirements for the MASTER OF THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT (BUILDING CONSERVATION) The University of New South Wales Graduate School of the Built Environment Catherine Macarthur 1995 Graduate Project - Catherine Macanhur 1995 UNSW ational Trust of Australia (NSW) Classi tication and Criteria "I hereby declare that this submission is my own work and that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, it contains no material previously published or written by another person nor material which to a sub­ stantial extent has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma of a university or other institute of higher learning, except where due acknowledgment is made in the text." Signed Catherine Rose Macarthur Graduate Project - Catherine Macarthur 1995 UNSW National Trust of Australia (NSW) Classification and Criteria NATIONAL TRUST OF AUSTRALIA (NSW) CLASSIFICATION and CRITERIA Research, Issue Analysis and Policy Development for recommendation to The National Trust of Australia (NSW) Page ABSTRACT 1 INTRODUCTION 2 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 5 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS 6 DEFINITIONS and ABBREVIATIONS 7 PART A RESEARCH 11 1.0 Brief history of the National Trust of Australia (NSW) and the Register . 12 2.0 The Conservation Division of the National Trust of Australia (NSW) 20 3.0 Assessment Criteria - The Conservation Division Technical Committees 23 4.0 Assessment Criteria - National Trust Registers of Australia 31 . - 5.0 Assessment Criteria - Other heritage lists in NSW 38 PARTB ISSUES 46 Discussion of Issues and Recommendations 1.0 Should the Trust continue its classification role? 49 2.0 What should the Trust classify? 55 3.0 Criteria for classification by the Trust 78 4.0 Process for classification by the Trust 88 5.0 Recommendations 99 ATTACHMENTS for PART B BIBLIOGRAPHY PARTC POLICY The draft model policy on classification (stand alone document) Graduate Project - Catherine Macarthur 1995 UNSW National Trust of Australia (NSW) Classification and Criteria APPENDICES ASSESSMENT CRITERIA OF THE FOLLOWING; A UNESCO - World Heritage Listings B AHC - Register of the National Estate C State Heritage Inventory (NSW) - (proposed) - Heritage Council Register (NSW) - Section 170 Heritage and Conservation Registers - Heritage Studies - Local and Regional - LEP and REP Heritage Schedules D RAIA - 20th Century Buildings List (NSW) E National Trust and State/Territory Government i) NSW - Department of Urban Affairs and Planning ii) ACT - ACT (Planning and Environment) Act 1991, and ACT National Trust worked example iii) Vic - National Trust iv) Vic - Historic Buildings Council v) Qld - Queensland Heritage Act 1992 vi) Tas - National Trust vii) Tas - Historic Cultural Heritage Bill 1994 viii) WA - National Trust ix) WA - Heritage Council x) SA - Heritage Act 1993 Graduate Project - Catherine Macarthur 1995 UNSW National Trust of Australia (NSW) Classification and Criteria INTRODUCTION ABSTRACT This graduate project investigates the role, criteria and process for classification of heri­ tage items for placing on the National Trust of Australia (NSW) Register. The problems facing the Trust with regard to classification are associated with change, in regard to a more comprehensive understanding of heritage, more rigorous assessment expectations, establishment of other lists since the first Trust register was published, and a general reduction in the available volunteer work force since the 1970s and 1980s. The report is divided into three parts containing research, issues discussion and a draft policy on classification. Part A The research has been limited to the Australian National Trusts and State, Terri­ tory and Commonwealth legislative procedures. Other Registers in New South Wales have been considered. Part B Issues are discussed under the following four sub-headings (i) Should the Trust continue its classification role?, (ii) What should the Trust classify?, (iii) Criteria for classification by the Trust, and (iv) Process for classification by the Trust. Each issue is followed by recommendations leading towards a policy statement. Part C The draft model policy on classification is intended to be a stand alone docu­ ment. The Report concludes that the Trust should maintain its Register and continue to identify and assess heritage in New South Wales, as it is the only independent and comprehen­ sive state based heritage register in New South Wales. The Trust should also retain its existing committee structure, and establish work programs which seek to address heri­ tage places otherwise under-represented in the Trust Register, and those places not clearly the responsibility of a government authority. These places include Migrant, post­ contact Aboriginal and twentieth century heritage places. Specific attention should also be given to identifying the heritage of specific geographical areas of New South Wales and typological studies. Work programs will need to address the availability of the volunteer work force. In striving for consistency and minimising duplication of heritage resources, the Trust should use the State Heritage Inventory (SHI) Historical Themes and Evaluation Criteria, when formally adopted by the Minister of Urban Affairs and Planning. Should the State Heritage Inventory be established as an effective State Government managed heritage list, the question of the Trust classification role should be revisited. Appendices form an important part of the Report. Examples included in Parts A and B may require reference to the appendices. Graduate Project - Catherine Macarthur 1995 UNSW National Trust of Australia (NSW) Classification and Criteria INTRODUCTION 2 INTRODUCTION The Report investigates the role, criteria and process for classification of heritage items for placing on the National Trust of Australia (NSW) Register. The problems facing the Trust with regard to classification are associated with change, in regard to a more comprehensive understanding of heritage, more rigorous assessment expectations, establishment of other lists since the first Trust register was published, and a general reduction in the available volunteer work force since the 1970s and 1980s. Heritage Registers and Legislative Change It has been found that identification of heritage items and maintaining of a heritage regis­ ter or list, is currently undertaken by a number of government and non-government bodies. The National Trust of Australia (NSW) was the first heritage register in Australia being first published in 1967. The introduction of Federal and State heritage legislation in 1975 and 1977 respectively, and the subsequent New South Wales Heritage System Review in 1992 has resulted in greatly changed responsibilities for heritage management in New South Wales. Community and professional bodies have also established their own heritage lists. With the exception of the National Trust of Australia (South Australia), all National Trusts in Australia continue to actively maintain a register. A number of State and Territories governments have also recently established heritage registers. The New South Wales Department of Urban Affairs and Planning has stated that a State Heritage Inventory will be established, however it is not intended to be a register necessarily affording statutory protection. Part A outlines the nature of the above lists and relevant assessment criteria used. Until such time as the State Heritage Inventory is properly established and purpose clearly defined, the New South Wales Trust Register should be actively maintained as it is the only State based independent heritage register in New South Wales. Even when operational the State Heritage Inventory will be subject to political change in regard to management and funding, a fact which further supports the existence of an independent classification role for the New South Wales Trust. Part B discusses the reasons for the National Trust of Australia (NSW) continuing to maintain a Register and other related issues. Under Represented Heritage A number of sectors of heritage in New South Wales are identified in this report as being under represented in the Trust register. Of these, post-contact Aboriginal sites, migrant heritage places, and twentieth century places were highlighted as categories requiring greater Trust recognition. Typological heritage studies resulting in classifications will also continue to be a highly relevant activity for the Trust. Heritage Assessment Criteria Assessment Criteria for assessing heritage significance have been developed in detail at a State, Territory and National level over the past five years. Recently introduced heritage legislation in most States and Territories in Australia has generally incorporated assess­ ment criteria based on recent criteria development, and consequently a number of National Trusts have adopted the same or similar criteria for compatibility and con­ sistency. In many cases the State or Territory assessment criteria are a modified version of the assessment criteria established by the Australian Heritage Commission for the Graduate Project - Catherine Macarthur 1995 UNSW National Trust of Australia (NSW) Classification and Criteria INTRODUCTION 3 Register of the National Estate. In New South Wales the Heritage Act 1977 New South Wales was written before recent criteria development, and as such does not include
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Woolloomooloo-Brochure-170719.Pdf
    Your companion on the road. We make your life stress-free by providing everything you need to create the stay you want. Apartment living with the benefits of a hotel service. stay real. Sydney’s harbour side suburb. Nesuto Woolloomooloo is situated on the Sydney city centre fringe, in the beautiful harbour side suburb of Woolloomooloo, about 900 metres from the heart of Sydney city on the eastern side towards Potts Point. These fabulous serviced-apartments are set in a beautiful heritage listed 4 storey building, located amongst traditional Sydney terrace houses in the tree lined streets of historic Woolloomooloo, a 3-minute walk from the restaurants and bars at Finger Wharf and the legendary Harry’s Cafe de Wheels. Nesuto Woolloomooloo Sydney Apartment Hotel offers a range of self-contained Studio, One, Two and Three Bedroom Apartments, allowing you to enjoy all the comforts of home whilst providing the convenience of apartment style accommodation, making it ideal for corporate and leisure travellers looking for short term or long stay accommodation within Sydney. Nesuto. stay real. A WELCOMING LIVING SPACE Nesuto Woolloomooloo Sydney Apartment Hotel offers a range of spacious self-contained Studio, One, Two and Three Bedroom Apartments in varying styles and layouts. We offer fully equipped kitchenettes, varied bedding arrangements and spacious living areas, ideal for guests wanting more space, solo travellers, couples, families, corporate workers or larger groups looking for a home away from home experience. Our Two and Three Bedroom apartments, along with some Studio apartments, have full length balconies offering spectacular views of the Sydney CBD cityscape and Sydney Harbour Bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.3 Precinct and Internal Address System 3.4 Building/Wharf
    22 3.3 Precinct and internal 3.4 Building/Wharf Identification address system Currently Wharf 4/5 has large neon signage Articulating individual venues, arts at the main Hickson Road entry point for companies, tenancies and public facilities the Sydney Theatre Company and Sydney within the overall precinct can be resolved Dance Company. Similar large neon building using the existing Wharf and Pier numbering signage is also located on the north facade and the historical internal and external bay of the finger wharf (in poor condition). numbers and other retained markers and There are also Walsh Bay Signage Code signs within the finger wharf structures. signs identifying vehicle entry points to each The inconsistent use of the terms ‘wharf’, wharf/pier. and ‘pier’ should be addressed and The renovation of Wharf 4/5 removed the corrected prior to development of signage significant large hand painted harbour and mapping. The existing theatres are facing pier numbers ‘4’ and ‘5’ which should well known as Wharf 4/5 whilst the eastern be reinterpreted and installed in a similar finger wharf is referred to as Pier 2/3. location similar to Pier 2/3. The utilitarian Confusion is extended with entries to the and functional nature of these elements east and west sides of Wharf 4/5 individually should be retained or reimagined where signed as Pier 4 and Pier 5. The general use they have been previously removed. of the term ‘wharf’ is encouraged following the more common local terminology of New building, wharf and pier identification ‘finger wharf’, Woolloomooloo Wharf, Manly is to be incorporated into the new works, Wharf etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Hyde Park Plan of Management and Masterplan Round Two Community Consultation Report on Facilitated Exhibition in Hyde Park and Written Submissions
    Draft Hyde Park Plan of Management and Masterplan Round Two Community Consultation Report on facilitated exhibition in Hyde Park and written submissions Prepared for The City of Sydney Council September 2006 Contents Introduction i Written feedback from exhibition participants 1 Anecdotal comments received by exhibition personnel from visitors who 7 did not complete a written response The written submissions from organizations 11 Submissions about the John Baptist Fountain 35 Summary of individual letters 57 CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION © 2005 Warwick Coombes + Penelope Coombes Pty Ltd Trading as The People for Places and Spaces Introduction to the Round Two consultation report Background to the Round Two Hyde Park consultation The People for Places and Spaces (PPS) to plan and implement a comprehensive public and stakeholder consultation program to inform the preparation of a new Plan of Management and Masterplan for Hyde Park. The draft Plan of Management and Masterplan was developed by Clouston Associates for the City. Round One of the consultation commenced in January 2006 and was completed in June 2006. The Round One outcomes were reported in separate volumes.1 Exhibition of the draft Plan of Management and Masterplan The draft Plan of Management and Masterplan were put on public exhibition during the period between 11 August to 7 September, 2006. The exhibition included the following elements: Static displays Static displays of the draft Plan of Management and Masterplan were mounted at the City of Sydney’s one-stop shops. People who attended the static displays were advised they could make written comment to Council about any aspect of the draft Plan of Management and Masterplan.
    [Show full text]
  • Barangaroo (Formerly East Darling Harbour): MP06 0162 MOD 4 (Hotel Development, Additional GFA and Height)
    PO Box 484 North Sydney NSW 2059 T: 02 8904 1011 F: 02 8904 1133 E: [email protected] Planning Institute of Australia (NSW Division) Submission: Barangaroo (formerly East Darling Harbour): MP06_0162 MOD 4 (Hotel development, additional GFA and Height) The Planning Institute of Australia (PIA) is the peak body representing professionals involved in planning Australian cities, towns and regions. The Institute has around 4,500 members nationally and around 1,300 members in New South Wales. PIA NSW plays key roles in promoting and supporting the planning profession within NSW and advocating key planning and public policy issues. Introduction The Planning Institute of Australia (NSW Division) welcomes the opportunity to comment on the proposed amendment for the approved Concept Plan for Barangaroo on Public Exhibition between 11 August 2010 and 10 September 2010. This submission has been prepared by members of PIA on behalf of the Institute. The Institute has made a previous submission on the Barangaroo proposals directly to the Barangaroo Delivery Authority, following the on-site public display within the Old Ports Building at Millers Point, earlier this year. This submission was prepared as a letter to the Chief Executive Officer of the Delivery Authority, dated 15 April 2010. A copy of this letter is included as an Attachment to this submission. Institute members have also more recently attended the Community Forums on Barangaroo organised by the Barangaroo Delivery Authority in May 2010 and also the current public exhibition display at the City of Sydney Council, One Stop Shop. The comments below relate to the proposed Amendment to the Concept Plan for Barangaroo currently on Public Exhibition.
    [Show full text]
  • REDFERN PARK Tree Management Plan
    REDFERN PARK Tree Management Plan Final - Adopted 23 October 2006 REDFERN PARK DRAFT TREE MANAGEMENT PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Redfern Park Tree Management Plan (TMP) was prepared as part of a suite of Tree Management Plans for the City of Sydney’s parks. The TMP forms part of the Redfern Park Plan of Management and informs the Masterplan. A major focus of the TMP is to implement a program of tree removal and replacements that will reinforce the strategies recommended in the 2006 Masterplan. The Tree Management Plan includes a survey of all of the existing trees within the Park (124 trees) and contains relevant heritage, environmental and arboricultural data relating to individual trees as well as distinct groups of trees such as the street tree planting around Redfern Oval. A Safe Useful Life Expectancy (SULE) analysis of the tree population was prepared. From this assessment the following removal and replacement strategies were recommended: • Staged removal and replacement of the boundary planting of Fig trees surrounding Redfern Park, over the next twenty years; • Twenty seven (27) trees to be removed within the Park over the next fi ve (5) years; • Eleven (11) of these trees to be removed from within the Park during the Redfern Oval upgrade; • Paperbarks in Elizabeth Street to be retained until a row of advanced Fig trees are planted within the boundary of Redfern Oval; • Removal of the street trees in Chalmers Street during the Redfern Oval upgrade; and • Removal of selected trees on Phillip Street during the Redfern Oval upgrade; The Tree Management Plan recommends a series of improved techniques to ensure best practice tree monitoring and arboricultural maintenance.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Environmental Factors Woolloomooloo Wastewater
    Review of Environmental Factors Woolloomooloo Wastewater Stormwater Separation Project March 2016f © Sydney Water Corporation (2016). Commercial in Confidence. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced without the express permission of Sydney Water. File Reference: T:\ENGSERV\ESECPD\EES Planning\2002XXXX_Hot spots 3\20029431 Woolloomooloo sewer separation\REF Publication number: SWS232 03/16 Table of Contents Declaration and sign off Executive summary ........................................................................................................... i 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Background .................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Woolloomooloo Wastewater Stormwater Separation .............................................. 2 1.3 Related stormwater projects ...................................................................................... 4 1.4 Scope of this REF ........................................................................................................ 4 2. Stakeholder and community consultation .......................................................... 5 2.1 Consultation objectives .............................................................................................. 5 2.2 Social analysis ............................................................................................................. 5 2.3 Consultation
    [Show full text]
  • Blak Douglas A.K.A Adam Hill
    Blak Douglas a.k.a Adam Hill Education 1989 Jamison High School (Penrith) 1994 BA Graphic Design University of Western Sydney, Nepean Awards / Competitions 2016 FINALIST Cossack Art Awards, Karatha W.A. 2015 FINALIST Archibald Prize, FINALIST- Parliament of NSW Aboriginal Art Prize 2014 FINALIST Mosman Art Prize 2004-9/11-14 FINALIST Parliament of NSW Aboriginal Art Prize (Commended) 2009 HIGHLY COMMENDED Cricket Art Prize Sydney, FINALIST- Wynne Prize 2003-8 FINALIST Telstra Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Art Award 2008 FINALIST Mil-Pra Art Prize 2007 FINALIST The Xstrata Coal Emerging Indigenous Art Award 2006 WINNER Maria Locke Award, Mil-Pra Art Prize 2005-10 FINALIST Parliament of NSW Indigenous Art Prize 2004 WINNER Mil-Pra Art Prize, Artist in Residence, The Canberra Grammar School 2003 WINNER Mil-Pra Art Prize – Liverpool Council Mayor’s Choice Award 2002 WINNER Blacktown City Art Prize – Inaugural Solo Exhibitions 2017 National an’them Blakspot Gallery ‐ Redfern 2016 OLD STORIES, NEW LIGHT The Glasshouse Gallery (accompanied by Unc. Milton Budge) 2015 MCA Art Bar, WHITEBRED Fontanelle Gallery Adelaide (TARNANTHI festival accompanied by Amanda Radomi) JOIN THE DOTS Boomalli Aboriginal Artists, Leichhardt- Sydney BLAKATTAK S.C.A. Sydney (accompanied by Adam Geczy) 2014 LAWFUL & PERMISSABLE Damien Minton Gallery, Redfern ILLUMINATE Old Parliament House, ACT 2013 BOMB Utrecht Gallery, Netherlands (accompanied by Adam Geczy) SMELLIN’ IT LIKE IT IS Tandanya Adelaide 2012 ONEinFOUR Damien Minton Gallery, NSW 2010 NOT A PROPPER
    [Show full text]
  • History on a Bus
    History on a Bus USING SOCIODRAMA TO ADDRESS RACISM AND RECONCILIATION HELEN KEARINS ABSTRACT In Sydney’s Redfern Park on the 10th of December 1992, the launch of the International Year of Indigenous People, the then Australian Prime Minister Paul Keating delivered a ground breaking speech that gave great hope to people working for reconciliation with Aboriginal Australians. One of those inspired to continue this work, Helen Kearins developed a workshop that assists participants to own racism and move beyond it towards genuine reconciliation with Aboriginal people. In this article, adapted from her 2011 AANZPA Accreditation thesis, she demonstrates the efficacy of sociodrama in this work. KEY WORDS Aboriginal Australians, racism, reconciliation, sociodrama, warm up, White Australians Setting the Scene On my way to or from work in Sydney, I often drive past Redfern Park. Many Australians associate the suburb of Redfern with a stereotype of Aboriginal poverty and dysfunction. Apart from the fact that the stereotype is grossly inaccurate, I have a very different association with Redfern Park. It was here on the 10th December 1992 that Prime Minister Paul Keating gave a speech, often referred to now as the Redfern Park Speech, to launch the 1993 International Year of the World’s Indigenous People. I was there. The speech was significant because it was the first time that an Australian prime minister had acknowledged that, “...the problem starts with us non-Aboriginal Australians”. He went on to say, “It begins I think with an act of recognition” and to name the elements in need of recognition. He emphasised the opportunity provided by this international year to address the injustices suffered by indigenous Australians and to continue working towards reconciliation.
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Assessments in Heritage Planning in New South Wales
    The Johnstone Centre Report Nº 184 Risk Assessments in Heritage Planning in New South Wales A Rapid Survey of Conservation Management Plans written in 1997–2002 by Dirk HR Spennemann Albury 2003 © Dirk H.R. Spennemann 2003 All rights reserved. The contents of this book are copyright in all countries sub- scribing to the Berne Convention. No parts of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without the written permission of the author, except where permitted by law. CIP DATA Spennemann, Dirk H.R. (1958–) Risk Assessments in Heritage Planning in New South Wales. A Rapid Survey of the Conservation Management Plans written in 1997–2002 / by Dirk H.R. Spennemann Johnstone Centre Report nº 184 Albury, N.S.W.: The Johnstone Centre, Charles Sturt University 1v.; ISBN 1 86467 136 X LCC HV551.A8 S* 2003 DDC 363.34525 1. Emergency Management—Australia—New South Wales; 2. Historic Preservation—Australia—New South Wales; 3. Historic Preservation—Emergency Management ii Contents Contents ...................................................................................................iii Introduction..............................................................................................4 Methodology............................................................................................5 The Sampling Frame.....................................................................5 Methodology..................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Two Ducks Family Ride
    WLING ST BOURKE ST LANG RD DO COOK RD DARLINGTON REDFERN ST CLEVELAND ST H CHELSEA ST MOREHEAD ST SOUT REDFERN ST DRIVER 10 ER R OL AV FL 11 GEORGE ST ST Redfern MADDISON ST YN BVD T ZAMIA ST Philip St Park Centennial EVELEIGH Tip: Use a low gear to MARRIO get up the hill on the ELIZABETH ST Park PHILLI way to CentennialRAGLAN Park! ST ST P ST NG RD 8 LA WYNDHAM BO 5 Footbridge HENDERSON RD TA DANK ST NY 6 Moore Park BEAUMONT Dismount and RD WELLING TO N ST BOURKE ST cross at Golf Course Use footpath next to S factory T pedestrian Busbys GEORGE ST crossing TSON RD Pond POTTER ST ROBER BUCKLAND ST Alexandria TIN RD YOUNG ST 7 Park MAR 9 Lily 4 JOHN ST 3 Pond RD Waterloo L FINISH L POWER ST ST DACEY AV ERSKINEVILLE MCEVOY Park WATERLOO ITCHE Busy intersection: M LN cross with care POWELL ST NT ST 12 O T ASHMORE ST WLING ST ALLEN ST A BELM N RENCE LN DO ALEXANDRIA ZAC PD BELMONW H LA WRENCE ST H AR LA ELIZABETH ST T LE SOUT Y Kensington ST BOWDEN ST Ponds BOURKE RD DARLEY RD RD ALISON RD L Raleigh L ON RD ST EU Park ITCHE M HUN MA SYDNEY DDOX ST JOHN ST PARK RD T Randwick LE O’RIORDAN ST Y ST Perry Racecource 1 Park WILLIAMWI ST Kids and footpaths: in NSW, LEGEND HUNTLE Sydney Park ST KENSINGTON children under the age of 12 Bike route Y QUEEN ST ST ORIA are legally allowed to ride on all ZETLAND Separated VICT footpaths.
    [Show full text]
  • Campbells Cove Promenade the Rocks.Indd
    STATEMENT OF HERITAGE IMPACT Campbells Cove Promenade, The Rocks November 2017 Issue G CAMPBELLS COVE PROMENADE, THE ROCKS ISSUE DESCRIPTION DATE ISSUED BY A Draft for Review 2/01/16 GM B Issued for DA submission 21/12/16 GM C Draft Response to Submissions 28/06/17 GM D Amended Draft 30/06/17 GM E Finalised for Submission 24/07/2017 GL F Update for Submission 21/09/2017 GM G Amended Masterplan for Submission 07/11/2017 GM GBA Heritage Pty Ltd Level 1, 71 York Street Sydney NSW 2000, Australia T: (61) 2 9299 8600 F: (61) 2 9299 8711 E: [email protected] W: www.gbaheritage.com ABN: 56 073 802 730 ACN: 073 802 730 Nominated Architect: Graham Leslie Brooks - NSW Architects Registration 3836 CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 4 1.1 REPORT OVERVIEW 4 1.2 REPORT OBJECTIVES 5 2.0 HISTORICAL SUMMARY 9 2.1 BRIEF HISTORY OF THE LOCALITY AND SITE 9 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 12 3.1 URBAN CONTEXT 12 3.2 VIEWS TO AND FROM THE SITE 12 4.0 ESTABLISHED HERITAGE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE SUBJECT SITE 14 4.1 ESTABLISHED SIGNIFICANCE OF THE ROCKS CONSERVATION AREA 14 4.2 ESTABLISHED SIGNIFICANCE OF CAST IRON GATES & RAILINGS 15 4.3 ESTABLISHED SIGNIFICANCE OF HERITAGE ITEMS IN THE VICINITY OF THE SUBJECT SITE 16 4.4 CURTILAGE ANALYSIS 20 4.5 ARCHAEOLOGICAL POTENTIAL 22 5.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL 23 6.0 ASSESSMENT OF HERITAGE IMPACT 25 6.1 INTRODUCTION 25 6.2 RESPONSE TO SUBMISSIONS 25 6.3 OVERVIEW OF THE POTENTIAL HERITAGE IMPACTS 26 6.4 CONSIDERATION OF THE GUIDELINES OF THE NSW HERITAGE DIVISION 26 6.5 EVALUATION AGAINST THE 2014 CMP POLICIES OF CAMPBELL’S STORES 27 7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 29 7.1 CONCLUSIONS 29 7.2 RECOMMENDATIONS 29 8.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY 31 Campbells Cove Promenade Statement of Heritage Impact November 2017 1.0 • consideration of the objectives and recommendations INTRODUCTION outlined in the Conservation Management Plan for The Campbell’s Stores; • requests further consideration be given to redesigning or relocating the boardwalk to reduce the visual and 1.1 REPORT OVERVIEW heritage impacts to the seawall.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission on the City of Sydney Draft Public Toilet Strategy 2013
    Draft Public Toilet Strategy 2013 City of Sydney September 2013 Prepared by the Physical Disability Council of NSW Jordana Goodman Policy Officer Physical Disability Council of NSW St Helens Community Centre 3/184 Glebe Point Road Glebe NSW 2037 Freecall: 1800 688 831 Phone: 02 9552 1606 Fax: 02 9552 1606 Fax: 02 9552 4644 Web: http://www.pdcn.nsw.org.au/ Email: [email protected] 1 Who is the Physical Disability Council of NSW? The Physical Disability Council of NSW (PDCN) is the peak body representing people with physical disabilities across New South Wales. This includes people with a range of physical disability issues, from young children and their representatives to aged people, who are from a wide range of socio-economic circumstances and live in metropolitan, rural and regional areas of NSW The objectives of PDCN are: • To educate, inform and assist people with physical disabilities in NSW about the range of services, structure and programs available that enable their full participation, equality of opportunity and equality of citizenship • To develop the capacity of people with physical disability in NSW to identify their own goals, and the confidence to develop a pathway to achieving their goals (ie self advocate). • To educate and inform stakeholders (ie about the needs of people with a physical disability) so they are able to achieve and maintain full participation, equality of opportunity and equality of citizenship. PDCN would like to thank the City of Sydney for the opportunity to make comment on the Draft Public Toilet Strategy 2013, and would like to support its recognition in the provision of universal access to public toilets, and commend its integration universal access and disability into the strategic plan.
    [Show full text]