DOCSLIB.ORG

Waterloo State Significant Precinct Study – Metro Quarter VISUAL IMPACT STUDY

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Waterloo State Significant Precinct Study – Metro Quarter VISUAL IMPACT STUDY Waterloo State Significant Precinct Study – Metro Quarter VISUAL IMPACT STUDY Waterloo State Significant Precinct Study – Metro Quarter Visual Impact Study 80217081 Prepared for UrbanGrowth NSW Development Corporation 2 October 2018 7 November 2018 Cardno i Contact Information Document Information Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Prepared for UrbanGrowth NSW ABN 95 001 145 035 Development Corporation Project Name Waterloo State Significant Level 9 - The Forum Precinct Study – Metro 203 Pacific Highway Quarter VISUAL St Leonards 2065 IMPACT STUDY Australia File Reference Revised Final for Lodgement www.cardno.com Phone +61 2 9496 7700 Job Reference 80217081 Fax +61 2 9496 7748 Date 7 November 2018 Version Number 7 Author(s): Shaun Grevler John O’Grady Effective Date 21/08/2018 Urban Planner Manager Urban Planning Approved By: John O’Grady Date Approved 21/08/2018 Manager Urban Planning Document History Version Effective Date Description of Revision Prepared by Reviewed by 1 25 May 2018 Draft Shaun Grevler John O’Grady John O’Grady 2 22 June 2018 Final Draft Shaun Grevler John O’Grady John O’Grady 3 5 July 2018 Final Shaun Grevler John O’Grady John O’Grady 4 23 July 2018 Final for Lodgement Shaun Grevler John O’Grady John O’Grady 5 21 August 2018 Revised Final for Lodgement Shaun Grevler John O’Grady John O’Grady 6 14 September 2018 Amended Final Shaun Grevler John O’Grady John O’Grady © Cardno. Copyright in the whole and every part of this document belongs to Cardno and may not be used, sold, transferred, copied or reproduced in whole or in part in any manner or form or in or on any media to any person other than by agreement with Cardno. This document is produced by Cardno solely for the benefit and use by the client in accordance with the terms of the engagement. Cardno does not and shall not assume any responsibility or liability whatsoever to any third party arising out of any use or reliance by any third party on the content of this document. 80217081 | 7 November 2018 | Commercial in Confidence ii 7 2 October 2018 Amended Final Shaun Grevler John O’Grady John O’Grady © Cardno. Copyright in the whole and every part of this document belongs to Cardno and may not be used, sold, transferred, copied or reproduced in whole or in part in any manner or form or in or on any media to any person other than by agreement with Cardno. This document is produced by Cardno solely for the benefit and use by the client in accordance with the terms of the engagement. Cardno does not and shall not assume any responsibility or liability whatsoever to any third party arising out of any use or reliance by any third party on the content of this document. 80217081 | 7 November 2018 | Commercial in Confidence iii Table of Contents Executive Summary 5 1 Introduction 6 1.1 Overall Precinct objectives 6 1.2 Waterloo State Significant Precinct 7 1.3 The Metro Quarter 8 1.4 Purpose 8 1.5 Study Requirements 8 2 Proposal 9 2.1 Proposed Planning Framework 9 2.2 Indicative Concept Proposal 9 3 Study process 12 3.1 Stage 1 Project Inception – Existing Conditions 12 3.2 Implementation Plan 12 3.3 Visual impact assessment 12 4 Baseline Investigations 13 4.1 Process 13 4.2 Metro Quarter – existing conditions 13 4.3 Metro Quarter – constraints and opportunities (visual quality) 15 5 Implementation Plan 16 5.1 The Metro Quarter – Vision Statement (Visual Quality) 16 5.2 Visual / urban quality plan 16 6 Visual Impacts Analysis 21 6.1 Viewpoint analysis 21 6.2 Close views 21 6.3 Medium distant views – within the Waterloo Estate 38 6.4 Medium distant views – outside the Waterloo Precinct 49 6.5 Distant views 66 6.6 Summary of assessment outcomes 71 6.7 Review of conclusions against relevant Court planning principles (Rose Bay Marina Pty Ltd v Woollahra Council and anor [2013] NSWLEC 1046) 72 7 Conclusion 74 iv Executive Summary The proposal will significantly improve the visibility of the Waterloo This report relates to both a State Significant Precinct (SSP) Study to create Congregational Church building by setting back new built form from the a new suite of planning controls, and an indicative Concept Proposal for the northern and southern boundaries of the Church, creating a broad through Waterloo Metro Quarter Integrated Station Development (ISD). The report site link on the northern side of the Church and increasing street setbacks provides an assessment of the potential visual impacts of the proposal in to Botany Road on either side of the Church to align with its street building response to the relevant Minister’s Requirements for the Project (issued 19 line. The net result of the proposed development will be to open up new May 2017): view lines to the Church and provide it with an open curtilage that will 2. Urban Design enhance its heritage values. 2.5 – Provide a views and visual assessment, with particular focus on The proposal will be only moderately visible from other parts of the Waterloo significant view lines to the Waterloo Congregational Church Precinct and from the west. Its success as a new element in views from building. Use eye level views from public parks and street these locations will be contingent on achievement of design excellence in footpaths, simulate a focal length of 55mm, to approximate the the completed development, with particular regard to the architectural correct proportions of the elements of views as experienced by design of the proposed tall buildings. the human eye, compare to existing views and analyse the relative quantity of visible sky. Include analysis of any visual From the north and south, at locations outside of the Waterloo Precinct, the impacts on the Conservation Areas and surrounding areas, and proposal will be almost completely screened from view by vegetation and any mitigation measures. existing buildings in the line of view. The process adopted for the study is consistent with current planning In distant regional views, the proposal will appear in the context of the principals set by the NSW Land and Environment Court for assessment of existing two tall buildings and four bulky buildings and the substantial tree the visual impacts of development proposals. Specifically, the study is canopy within and adjacent to the Waterloo Precinct (see Figure 7.46). If consistent with the principles for assessment of visual impacts of designed against principles of design excellence, the taller buildings in the development on the public domain set by Rose Bay Marina Pty Ltd v proposal will potentially improve the quality of these existing views by Woollahra Council and anor [2013] NSWLEC 1046; and photomontages creating architectural relief to the continuous building “walls” in these views. relied upon by the Study have been prepared in a manner consistent with The NSW Land and Environment Court Photomontage Policy. The proposal has been found to have an acceptable impact on the conservation values of all local Conservation Areas including specifically, The study assessed the visual character and quality of Waterloo and its the Redfern Estate, the Alexandria Park Conservation Area and the environs and derived Planning Principles to protect and enhance the Waterloo Conservation Area. identified positive components of its visual character. The Metro Precinct proposal was assessed against these Planning Principles. The proposal has been found to be consistent with the visual quality Planning Principles for development of the Waterloo Precinct and Metro Quarter and is The findings of the assessment are: considered to be worthy of support with regard to its effects on the existing The proposal will significantly change views from streets immediately visual environment of the site and its locality. surrounding the Metro Quarter site and from street blocks to the east of the site within the Waterloo Estate. Measures to ensure that this change will be positive will include design development to result in a high quality ground plane including allowance for healthy growth of forest scale trees in the street and other proposed public places. 5 1 Introduction 1.1 Overall Precinct objectives The following are the objectives for renewal of the Precinct: The Minister for Planning has determined that parts of Waterloo (the Precinct) are of State planning significance which should be investigated for rezoning Housing: A fully integrated urban village of social, private and affordable housing through the State Significant Precinct (SSP) process. Study Requirements for such investigations were issued by the Minister on 19 May 2017. A place that meets the housing needs of people with different backgrounds, ages, incomes, abilities and lifestyles – a place where everyone belongs. New homes for Investigation of the Precinct is being undertaken by UrbanGrowth NSW social, affordable and private residents that are not distinguishable and are Development Corporation (UrbanGrowth NSW), in partnership with NSW Land modern, comfortable, efficient, sustainable and adaptable. and Housing Corporation (LAHC) and Sydney Metro. The outcome of the State Significant Precinct process will be new planning controls that will enable Services and Amenities: New and improved services, facilities and amenities to development applications for renewal of the Precinct. support a diverse community The Precinct includes two separate, but adjoining and inter-related parts: A place that provides suitable and essential services and facilities so that all The Waterloo Metro Quarter (the Metro Quarter) residents have easy access to health, wellbeing, community support, retail and government services. The Waterloo Estate (the Estate) While the study requirements for the Precinct were provided as separate Culture & Design: A safe and welcoming place to live and visit requirements for the Metro Quarter and for the Estate, comprehensive baseline investigations have been prepared for the entire Precinct.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Draft Hyde Park Plan of Management and Masterplan Round Two Community Consultation Report on Facilitated Exhibition in Hyde Park and Written Submissions
    Draft Hyde Park Plan of Management and Masterplan Round Two Community Consultation Report on facilitated exhibition in Hyde Park and written submissions Prepared for The City of Sydney Council September 2006 Contents Introduction i Written feedback from exhibition participants 1 Anecdotal comments received by exhibition personnel from visitors who 7 did not complete a written response The written submissions from organizations 11 Submissions about the John Baptist Fountain 35 Summary of individual letters 57 CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION © 2005 Warwick Coombes + Penelope Coombes Pty Ltd Trading as The People for Places and Spaces Introduction to the Round Two consultation report Background to the Round Two Hyde Park consultation The People for Places and Spaces (PPS) to plan and implement a comprehensive public and stakeholder consultation program to inform the preparation of a new Plan of Management and Masterplan for Hyde Park. The draft Plan of Management and Masterplan was developed by Clouston Associates for the City. Round One of the consultation commenced in January 2006 and was completed in June 2006. The Round One outcomes were reported in separate volumes.1 Exhibition of the draft Plan of Management and Masterplan The draft Plan of Management and Masterplan were put on public exhibition during the period between 11 August to 7 September, 2006. The exhibition included the following elements: Static displays Static displays of the draft Plan of Management and Masterplan were mounted at the City of Sydney’s one-stop shops. People who attended the static displays were advised they could make written comment to Council about any aspect of the draft Plan of Management and Masterplan.
    [Show full text]
  • REDFERN PARK Tree Management Plan
    REDFERN PARK Tree Management Plan Final - Adopted 23 October 2006 REDFERN PARK DRAFT TREE MANAGEMENT PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Redfern Park Tree Management Plan (TMP) was prepared as part of a suite of Tree Management Plans for the City of Sydney’s parks. The TMP forms part of the Redfern Park Plan of Management and informs the Masterplan. A major focus of the TMP is to implement a program of tree removal and replacements that will reinforce the strategies recommended in the 2006 Masterplan. The Tree Management Plan includes a survey of all of the existing trees within the Park (124 trees) and contains relevant heritage, environmental and arboricultural data relating to individual trees as well as distinct groups of trees such as the street tree planting around Redfern Oval. A Safe Useful Life Expectancy (SULE) analysis of the tree population was prepared. From this assessment the following removal and replacement strategies were recommended: • Staged removal and replacement of the boundary planting of Fig trees surrounding Redfern Park, over the next twenty years; • Twenty seven (27) trees to be removed within the Park over the next fi ve (5) years; • Eleven (11) of these trees to be removed from within the Park during the Redfern Oval upgrade; • Paperbarks in Elizabeth Street to be retained until a row of advanced Fig trees are planted within the boundary of Redfern Oval; • Removal of the street trees in Chalmers Street during the Redfern Oval upgrade; and • Removal of selected trees on Phillip Street during the Redfern Oval upgrade; The Tree Management Plan recommends a series of improved techniques to ensure best practice tree monitoring and arboricultural maintenance.
    [Show full text]
  • Blak Douglas A.K.A Adam Hill
    Blak Douglas a.k.a Adam Hill Education 1989 Jamison High School (Penrith) 1994 BA Graphic Design University of Western Sydney, Nepean Awards / Competitions 2016 FINALIST Cossack Art Awards, Karatha W.A. 2015 FINALIST Archibald Prize, FINALIST- Parliament of NSW Aboriginal Art Prize 2014 FINALIST Mosman Art Prize 2004-9/11-14 FINALIST Parliament of NSW Aboriginal Art Prize (Commended) 2009 HIGHLY COMMENDED Cricket Art Prize Sydney, FINALIST- Wynne Prize 2003-8 FINALIST Telstra Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Art Award 2008 FINALIST Mil-Pra Art Prize 2007 FINALIST The Xstrata Coal Emerging Indigenous Art Award 2006 WINNER Maria Locke Award, Mil-Pra Art Prize 2005-10 FINALIST Parliament of NSW Indigenous Art Prize 2004 WINNER Mil-Pra Art Prize, Artist in Residence, The Canberra Grammar School 2003 WINNER Mil-Pra Art Prize – Liverpool Council Mayor’s Choice Award 2002 WINNER Blacktown City Art Prize – Inaugural Solo Exhibitions 2017 National an’them Blakspot Gallery ‐ Redfern 2016 OLD STORIES, NEW LIGHT The Glasshouse Gallery (accompanied by Unc. Milton Budge) 2015 MCA Art Bar, WHITEBRED Fontanelle Gallery Adelaide (TARNANTHI festival accompanied by Amanda Radomi) JOIN THE DOTS Boomalli Aboriginal Artists, Leichhardt- Sydney BLAKATTAK S.C.A. Sydney (accompanied by Adam Geczy) 2014 LAWFUL & PERMISSABLE Damien Minton Gallery, Redfern ILLUMINATE Old Parliament House, ACT 2013 BOMB Utrecht Gallery, Netherlands (accompanied by Adam Geczy) SMELLIN’ IT LIKE IT IS Tandanya Adelaide 2012 ONEinFOUR Damien Minton Gallery, NSW 2010 NOT A PROPPER
    [Show full text]
  • History on a Bus
    History on a Bus USING SOCIODRAMA TO ADDRESS RACISM AND RECONCILIATION HELEN KEARINS ABSTRACT In Sydney’s Redfern Park on the 10th of December 1992, the launch of the International Year of Indigenous People, the then Australian Prime Minister Paul Keating delivered a ground breaking speech that gave great hope to people working for reconciliation with Aboriginal Australians. One of those inspired to continue this work, Helen Kearins developed a workshop that assists participants to own racism and move beyond it towards genuine reconciliation with Aboriginal people. In this article, adapted from her 2011 AANZPA Accreditation thesis, she demonstrates the efficacy of sociodrama in this work. KEY WORDS Aboriginal Australians, racism, reconciliation, sociodrama, warm up, White Australians Setting the Scene On my way to or from work in Sydney, I often drive past Redfern Park. Many Australians associate the suburb of Redfern with a stereotype of Aboriginal poverty and dysfunction. Apart from the fact that the stereotype is grossly inaccurate, I have a very different association with Redfern Park. It was here on the 10th December 1992 that Prime Minister Paul Keating gave a speech, often referred to now as the Redfern Park Speech, to launch the 1993 International Year of the World’s Indigenous People. I was there. The speech was significant because it was the first time that an Australian prime minister had acknowledged that, “...the problem starts with us non-Aboriginal Australians”. He went on to say, “It begins I think with an act of recognition” and to name the elements in need of recognition. He emphasised the opportunity provided by this international year to address the injustices suffered by indigenous Australians and to continue working towards reconciliation.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Ducks Family Ride
    WLING ST BOURKE ST LANG RD DO COOK RD DARLINGTON REDFERN ST CLEVELAND ST H CHELSEA ST MOREHEAD ST SOUT REDFERN ST DRIVER 10 ER R OL AV FL 11 GEORGE ST ST Redfern MADDISON ST YN BVD T ZAMIA ST Philip St Park Centennial EVELEIGH Tip: Use a low gear to MARRIO get up the hill on the ELIZABETH ST Park PHILLI way to CentennialRAGLAN Park! ST ST P ST NG RD 8 LA WYNDHAM BO 5 Footbridge HENDERSON RD TA DANK ST NY 6 Moore Park BEAUMONT Dismount and RD WELLING TO N ST BOURKE ST cross at Golf Course Use footpath next to S factory T pedestrian Busbys GEORGE ST crossing TSON RD Pond POTTER ST ROBER BUCKLAND ST Alexandria TIN RD YOUNG ST 7 Park MAR 9 Lily 4 JOHN ST 3 Pond RD Waterloo L FINISH L POWER ST ST DACEY AV ERSKINEVILLE MCEVOY Park WATERLOO ITCHE Busy intersection: M LN cross with care POWELL ST NT ST 12 O T ASHMORE ST WLING ST ALLEN ST A BELM N RENCE LN DO ALEXANDRIA ZAC PD BELMONW H LA WRENCE ST H AR LA ELIZABETH ST T LE SOUT Y Kensington ST BOWDEN ST Ponds BOURKE RD DARLEY RD RD ALISON RD L Raleigh L ON RD ST EU Park ITCHE M HUN MA SYDNEY DDOX ST JOHN ST PARK RD T Randwick LE O’RIORDAN ST Y ST Perry Racecource 1 Park WILLIAMWI ST Kids and footpaths: in NSW, LEGEND HUNTLE Sydney Park ST KENSINGTON children under the age of 12 Bike route Y QUEEN ST ST ORIA are legally allowed to ride on all ZETLAND Separated VICT footpaths.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission on the City of Sydney Draft Public Toilet Strategy 2013
    Draft Public Toilet Strategy 2013 City of Sydney September 2013 Prepared by the Physical Disability Council of NSW Jordana Goodman Policy Officer Physical Disability Council of NSW St Helens Community Centre 3/184 Glebe Point Road Glebe NSW 2037 Freecall: 1800 688 831 Phone: 02 9552 1606 Fax: 02 9552 1606 Fax: 02 9552 4644 Web: http://www.pdcn.nsw.org.au/ Email: [email protected] 1 Who is the Physical Disability Council of NSW? The Physical Disability Council of NSW (PDCN) is the peak body representing people with physical disabilities across New South Wales. This includes people with a range of physical disability issues, from young children and their representatives to aged people, who are from a wide range of socio-economic circumstances and live in metropolitan, rural and regional areas of NSW The objectives of PDCN are: • To educate, inform and assist people with physical disabilities in NSW about the range of services, structure and programs available that enable their full participation, equality of opportunity and equality of citizenship • To develop the capacity of people with physical disability in NSW to identify their own goals, and the confidence to develop a pathway to achieving their goals (ie self advocate). • To educate and inform stakeholders (ie about the needs of people with a physical disability) so they are able to achieve and maintain full participation, equality of opportunity and equality of citizenship. PDCN would like to thank the City of Sydney for the opportunity to make comment on the Draft Public Toilet Strategy 2013, and would like to support its recognition in the provision of universal access to public toilets, and commend its integration universal access and disability into the strategic plan.
    [Show full text]
  • A Systemic Linguistic Analysis of Two Prime Ministerial Speeches
    A Systemic Linguistic Analysis of Two Prime Ministerial Speeches Paul Dickinson Assignment submitted for Master of Arts in Applied Linguistics March 2009 Functional Grammar FG/09/01 Apply the principles of systemic linguistic analysis explored in the course to a comparison of the style and communicative functionality of two short texts or text extracts of your own choice. The texts should have a similar subject matter, be drawn from a similar institutional or discourse domain (science, economics, health care provision, tourism, politics, the arts etc) or have some other obvious point of similarity. They need, however, to differ significantly in some aspect of their style, structure, approach, tone. You should indicate how the texts are similar and how they are different in terms of their general stylistic properties and their communicative functionality. Your claims should be backed up by means of an analysis of the types of lexical and grammatical features explored in the course. That is to say, you should consider whether the texts are similar or different in terms of the types of textual, interpersonal and experiential (ideational) meanings explored in the materials. Estimated Word Count: 4,300 (excluding cover page, contents, quotes, tables, references and appendices) Centre for English Language Studies Postgraduate Programmes THE UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM Edgbaston Birmingham B15 2TT UK Table of Contents page 1. Introduction......................................................................................... 2 2. Literature Review.............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Green Environmental Sustainability Progress Report
    January to June 2018 A detailed bi-annual overview of the City of Sydney’s progress against our environmental sustainability targets for both the Local Government Area (LGA) and the City’s own operations. Green Environmental Sustainability Progress Report January to June 2018 A detailed bi-annual overview of the City of Sydney’s progress against our environmental sustainability targets for both the Local Government Area (LGA) and the City’s own operations. 1. Our environmental targets 3 2. Sustainability at the City of Sydney 5 3. Low-carbon city 10 4. Water sensitive city 20 5. Climate resilient city 31 6. Zero waste city 34 7. Active and connected city 38 8. Green and cool city 44 9. Delivering to the community 50 10. Glossary 55 11. Appendix 1: Data management plan 57 12. Appendix 2: Environment Policy 61 1 Green Environmental Sustainability Progress Report January to June 2018 Message from the CEO We continue to lead by example In March 2017 the Lord Mayor and Council strengthened the commitment to ensuring the City of Sydney is an towards a vision of a GREEN, inspiring environmental leader by endorsing the Environmental Action 2016 – 2021 Strategy and Action GLOBAL and CONNECTED city. Plan (the Strategy). To drive change in our own The Strategy commits to specific environmental targets and strong actions on energy, water, climate adaptation, operations and to work waste, transport and greening over the next five years and proactively with businesses, the reaffirms Sustainable Sydney 2030. In the most recent period, January to June 2018 our local community and all levels of activity with business, community and government, continues to achieve major successes as we address the government across the local climate change risks faced by our city.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Environmental Sustainability Progress Report
    Green Environmental Sustainability Progress Report July to December 2016 A detailed bi-annual overview of the City of Sydney’s progress against our environmental sustainability targets for both the Local Government Area (LGA) and the City’s own operations. 1. Highlights 3 2. Draft Environmental Strategy 2016-2021 5 3. Our future targets 6 4. Sustainability at the City of Sydney 8 5. Low-carbon city 9 6. Water sensitive city 19 7. Climate resilient city 28 8. Zero waste city 31 9. Active and connected city 36 10. Green and cool city 41 11. Delivering to the community 47 12. Glossary 53 13. Appendix 1: Data management plan 56 14. Appendix 2: Environmental Policy 58 Green Environmental Sustainability Progress Report July to December 2016 Message from the CEO The City of Sydney is committed In December 2016, I attended the sixth biennial C40 to securing Sydney’s future, its Mayors Summit in Mexico City. At the Summit we prosperity and liveability. The considered new research that highlighted the urgent need for action on climate change and the sheer scale of City defines Sustainability in the challenge we all face, especially city leaders. What is clear is that the next four years are crucial and keeping with the Brundtland will determine whether the world meets the ambition of Report1 of 1987 as meeting the the Paris Agreement to limit global temperature rise to less than 2oC, and to drive efforts to limit the temperature environmental, social and increase even further to 1.5oC. Incremental steps are no longer adequate – we need to dramatically increase economic needs of the present action.
    [Show full text]
  • 1.2 Development Overview
    1.2 Development Overview 1.2.1 Overview of proposed development 1.2.2 Planning framework The development application seeks approval for the fol- State Environmental Planning Policy (SEPP) Major Devel- lowing components of the development: opment 2005 is the principal environmental planning in- strument applying to the ATP. Schedule 3, Part 5 of the • Site preparation works, including demolition and Major Development SEPP sets out the zoning, land use clearance of the existing car parking areas/ancillary and development controls that apply to development on facilities and excavation; the Site. • Construction and use of a 9 storey building within Lot 9 (Building 1), comprising of parking, retail, commercial As the development has a capital investment value of more and childcare uses; than $10 million it is identified as State Significant Devel- • Construction and use of a 7 storey building within opment under the State Environmental Planning Policy Lot 12 (Building 2) comprising of parking, retail and (State and Regional Development) 2011, with the Minister commercial uses; for Planning the consent authority for the project. • Construction and use of a 4 storey community building within Lot 8 (Community Building) comprising of gym, retail, community, commercial and childcare uses; • Extensive landscaping and public domain improvements throughout the precinct for the benefit of the local community; and • Extension and augmentation of physical infrastructure/ utilities as required. A more detailed and comprehensive description of the pro- posal is contained in the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) prepared by JBA. Figure 2 fjmt + sissons public artwork strategy introduction 7 2.0 Site Specifity 2.1 Site Overview 2.1.1 Local Environment - Relationship to Key Urban Spaces 2.1.2 Local Context - Relationship to Immediate Context 2.1.3 Immediate Site - Public Art Opportunities The Australian Technology Park, located approximately 4 kilometres south of Sydney’s Central Business The area surrounding the site contains a mix of residential, educational and railway uses.
    [Show full text]
  • Blak Douglas
    Born Adam Douglas Hill Blacktown (1970) Western Sydney to a Dhungatti Aboriginal Father / Caucasian Mother. Lives and works in Sydney Education 1989 - Jamison High School (Penrith) 1994 - BA GRAPHIC DESIGN - University of Western Sydney, Nepean Awards / Competitions 2020 FINALIST- The Archibald Prize, Mosman Art Prize 2019 FINALIST- The Muswellbrook Art Prize, The Archibald Prize, The Wynne Prize, WINNER Kilgour Prize, The Kings Art Prize, Mosman Art Prize, Paddington Art Prize, Blacktown Art Prize 2018 FINALIST- The Archibald Prize, The Blake Prize, King & Wood Mallesons Contemporary ATSI art prize, Mosman Art Prize, Fishers Ghost Art Award, Blacktown Art Prize, Korean Australian Art Foundation Prize 2017 FINALIST- Mosman Art Prize, Mosman Art Prize, Sydney 2016 FINALIST- Cossack Art Awards, Karatha W.A. 2015 FINALIST- The Archibald Prize, FINALIST- Parliament of NSW Aboriginal Art Prize 2014 FINALIST- Mosman Art Prize 2004-9/11-14 FINALIST- Parliament of NSW Aboriginal Art Prize (Commended) 2009 HIGHLY COMMENDED- Cricket Art Prize Sydney, FINALIST- Wynne Prize 2003-8 Telstra Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Art Award FINALIST 2008 FINALIST- Mil-Pra Art Prize 2007 FINALIST- The Xstrata Coal Emerging Indigenous Art Award 2006 WINNER- Maria Locke Award, Mil-Pra Art Prize 2005-10 FINALIST- Parliament of NSW Aboriginal Art Prize 2004 WINNER- Mil-Pra Art Prize, Artist in Residence, The Canberra Grammar School 2003 WINNER- Mil-Pra Art Prize - Liverpool Council Mayor's Choice Award 2002 WINNER- Blacktown City Art Prize - Inaugural Solo Exhibitions 2020 SACRIFICIAL COMMODITY - Nanda Hobbs, Sydney 2018 TRANSPARENT COVENANT - JE Fine Art, Bangalow, URBAN WALKABOUT - Cooee Gallery, Paddington 2017 Art Atrium - Bondi Junction, National an’ them - Blakspot Gallery - Redfern illuminARTi, studio exhibit - Redfern, It’s a flee country - Blakspot Gallery - Redfern 2016 THE MOST GAOLED RACE ON EARTH (The Lockup Arts Space - accompanying Dr Adam Geczy), OLD STORIES, NEW LIGHT, (The Glasshouse Gallery - accompanied by Unc.
    [Show full text]
  • 19 September 2016 Kim Ellis Director Centennial Park and Moore Park
    19 September 2016 Kim Ellis Director Centennial Park and Moore Park Trust [email protected] Dear Kim Moore Park Master Plan 2040 Establishing a master plan for Moore Park is vital to achieving the community’s long term vision and protecting the park in the future; I commend the Centennial Park and Moore Park Trust for taking on this important task. While there are some important proposals to green parts of Moore Park, I share strong community concern that the draft master plan represents a dangerous move towards commercialisation and alienation of public land that is vital to the region and fails to expand much-needed space for passive recreation. Moore Park is part of the Sydney Common that was set aside by Governor Macquarie in 1811 for the long term recreation needs of present and future Sydney generations. Less than a third of the original bequest is open public land, yet the demand for green open space is growing at unprecedented rates due to urban consolidation policies and continuing major inner city redevelopments, including at Green Square adjacent to the park. The focus of Moore Park future planning must be to provide for the long term recreational needs of the surrounding communities. Tree Planting and Canopy Extension There is strong community support for proposals that increase trees and vegetation across the park. Moore Park has pockets of wild nature and these areas must be enhanced and expanded to improve the passive recreation experience and ensure the park remains a peaceful haven from the city for expanding populations.
    [Show full text]