Environmental Assessment 1

Wilnecote Quarry Town & Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

Environmental Statement

Hanson Building Products Limited Geoplan Limited WilnecoteQuarry Town & Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

Environmental Statement

Contents Page

Background to Environmental Assessment 1

The Development Proposals 8

Noise 9

Air Quality/Dust 16

Landscape and Visual Impact 25

Ecology and Nature Conservation 42

Transport 63

Socio-Economic 65

Sustainability 67

Alternatives 73

Conclusions 74

Technical Appendices:

1. Noise Assessment

2. Air Quality/Dust Assessment

3. Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment

4. Ecological Assessment

Hanson Building Products Limited Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town & Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

Background to Environmental Assessment

ES 1.0 Introduction

ES 1.0.1 This Environmental Statement (ES) has been prepared in accordance with the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (England and Wales) Regulations 2010 (the ‘EIA Regulations’). It accompanies and should be read in conjunction with, a planning application by Hanson Building Products Limited that proposes variation of planning conditions to allow amendment to approved quarry development drawings in order to maximise reserve recovery and construction of an internal site haul road at Wilnecote Quarry, Dobshill, Staffordshire.

ES 1.0.2 The scope of the environmental assessment has been determined with reference to an earlier assessment undertaken in April 2000 and takes into account the potential interaction of the development on key environmental factors identified in the EIA Regulations.

ES 1.0.3 For each issue considered within the Environmental Statement, the methodology used is set out, details of the existing (baseline) situation provided, and impacts likely to result from the proposed development predicted. Using this information any measures necessary to reduce or avoid the impacts are identified and the significance of any remaining impacts evaluated.

Hanson Building Products. Limited Page 1 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town & Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

ES 1.1 Legal Basis and Purpose of the Environmental Statement

ES 1.1.1 The statutory framework for Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is provided by the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (England and Wales) Regulations 2010 (hereafter referred to as the EIA Regulations). These regulations implement the European Directive 85/337/EEC, amended by Directive 97/11/EC, and require that certain types of development are to be subject to EIA.

ES 1.1.2 This Environmental Statement (ES) sets out the findings of the EIA. It provides a description of the proposed development, details of existing environmental conditions and an assessment of the likely environmental effects of the proposed scheme. The ES has been prepared in accordance with the EIA Regulations and DETR Circular 02/99 ‘Environmental Impact Assessment’.

ES 1.1.3 Technical input to the ES has been provided by Hanson Building Products Limited, Geoplan and various other technical stand-alone reports which have been commissioned to support the application. Full details of commissioned surveys and data used in this ES are given in the individual chapters and their corresponding technical appendices.

ES 1.2 The EIA Process

ES 1.2.1 As noted earlier, the key legislation that defines the EIA process and the subsequent content of an Environmental Statement is the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (England

Hanson Building Products. Limited Page 2 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town & Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

and Wales) Regulations 2010 supplemented by DETR Circular 02/99 Environmental Impact Assessment. The key stages in the EIA process are to:

. Establish whether EIA is required (screening);

. Establish the scope of the EIA in terms of impacts and issues to be considered (scoping);

. Describe the proposed scheme and alternatives considered;

. Describe the existing (baseline) environmental conditions at the site and, where appropriate, in the surrounding area;

. Identify the likely environmental impacts of the proposed development;

. Identify mitigation measures that could be implemented to avoid or reduce any potential adverse environmental impacts and to provide or enhance beneficial environmental impacts of the scheme;

. Assess the residual environmental impacts of the scheme, taking mitigation measures into account; and finally

. Produce an Environmental Statement (ES) to present the above information

ES 1.3 Screening

ES 1.3.1 No formal screening application has been made to Staffordshire County Council in connection with this application, although discussions have been held with officers of the authority. As the original planning application which permitted working of this part of the site was accompanied by an ES, an ES has been prepared for the current application although the scope has been reviewed and revised where deemed appropriate.

Hanson Building Products. Limited Page 3 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town & Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

ES 1.4 Scoping

ES 1.4.1 No formal scoping request has been made to the Council, although details of the development proposals have been provided to the Council and officers have provided informal pre-application advice on issues they believe should addressed.

ES 1.4.2 There is no formal requirement in the EIA Regulations to produce a scoping report prior to an Environmental Statement, DETR Circular 2/99 acknowledges at paragraph 82 that the role of EIA is to examine “the main or significant effects to which a development is likely to give rise”. The purpose of scoping is therefore to identify at an early stage in the EIA process the key environmental issues, which then permits subsequent work to concentrate on a more focussed range of environmental topics.

ES 1.4.3 The objectives of scoping are to:

. Identify potential environmental issues associated with the proposal;

. Assess those environmental issues which should be considered further in the final reports to accompany the planning application;

. Provide a basis for consultation, where appropriate, with statutory and non-statutory consultees on the relevant environmental issues;

. Define what methods will be used to assess the environmental effects of the proposal;

. Where appropriate, agree with statutory and non-statutory consultees on these methods.

Hanson Building Products. Limited Page 4 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town & Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

ES 1.4.4 The key environmental issues identified by the Council as pertinent to the development under consideration are:

• Noise

• Landscape and Visual Impact

• Ecology

• Historic Built Environment – Hockley Hall

• Rights of Way

ES 1.5 Structure of the ES

ES 1.5.1 For each of the chapters where potential environmental impacts have been identified, the following format has been used:

. Introduction

. Methodology

. Baseline/existing situation

. Predicted impacts

. Proposed mitigation measures

. Significance of residual impacts/Conclusions

ES 1.5.2 This allows a clear analysis of the predicted impacts of the scheme relative to the existing situation and the significance of these impacts following implementation of proposed mitigation measures.

ES 1.5.3 Each chapter considers beneficial and adverse, short-term and long- term impacts during operation.

Hanson Building Products. Limited Page 5 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town & Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

ES 1.6 Assessment of Significance

ES 1.6.1 The evaluation of impact significance has taken into account the extent, magnitude and duration of the impact (measured against the baseline situation and performance against environmental quality standards where appropriate), its reversibility or irreversibility, its compatibility with environmental policies and the sensitivity of the receptor. Significance levels are defined separately for each topic within the methodology sections, in relation to appropriate standards/guidelines where appropriate, such as the Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (Landscape Institute and IEMA 2002).

ES 1.6.2 For ease of reference the Planning Application, Environmental Statement and Technical Appendices have been bound together. All schedules, survey data and specialist’s reports referred to in the following text are included within the Technical Appendices. These appendices should be read in conjunction with the written statements contained within the planning application and environmental statement and cross referenced, where appropriate.

ES 1.6.3 The Non-technical Summary of the ES forms a stand-alone document, written to summarise the proposals and enable members of the public, without specialist knowledge of the mineral industry and the planning process, to understand the basis of the application and the likely effects upon the environment.

ES 1.6.4 The Planning Application and Environmental Statement have been compiled and project managed by Geoplan Limited, with input from

Hanson Building Products. Limited Page 6 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town & Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

Hanson Building Products Limited and specialist input from the following consultants:

Planning/Project Management Geoplan

Restoration Geoplan

Landscape & Visual Impact Geoplan

Noise White Young Green

Ecology Philip Parker Associates

Air Quality White Young Green

ES 1.6.5 Full copies of the Environmental Statement may be purchased for £100 plus VAT, no charge will be made for copies of the Non-Technical Summary. Anyone wishing to acquire copies of either document should contact Martin Clayton at Unit 7, Heritage Business Centre, Belper, Derbyshire DE56 1SW.

Hanson Building Products. Limited Page 7 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town and Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs ‘2011 Environmental Statement

Development Proposals

DP 1.0 Introduction

DP 1.0.1 The development proposals comprise:-

• Minor extension of the site’s operational area to allow the construction of an internal site haul road

• Variation of planning permissions T 05/08/905 MW and T17380 to amend approved quarry development drawings

DP 1.0.2 The development proposals are described in full in the accompanying planning application which should be read in conjunction with this Environmental Statement and they are therefore not repeated again here.

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 8 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town And Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

Noise

N 1.0 Introduction

N 1.0.1 White Young Green environmental consultancy, have been commissioned to undertake a noise impact assessment of the development proposals. A full copy of the assessment is attached as Tab 5.

N 1.0.2 A description of the existing environment in and around the site is provided and an assessment of the impacts on nearby sensitive residential properties has been undertaken. The results of a baseline noise survey have been used to characterise the existing noise environment at residential dwellings surrounding the site and noise levels from the proposed scheme have been predicted at local representative receptors using CADNA noise modelling software which incorporates ISO 9613 methodologies and calculations.

N 2.0 Methodology

N 2.0.1 Information regarding noise emissions from equipment used on construction and open sites has been obtained from Annex C of BS 5228–1:2009 Code of practice for noise and vibration control on construction and open sites – Part 1: Noise. This annex presents a range of current sound level data on typical site equipment and common site activities.

N 2.0.2 This data was obtained by field measurements for items of plant in actual use on construction and open sites in the UK. Levels quoted in the database are based on an average (logarithmic) of measured

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 9 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town And Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

sound levels, and where appropriate have been derived from more than one model of similarly sized plant.

N 2.0.3 The items of plant and associated noise levels shown in Table 3.2 of the full report have been used for the purposes of this assessment and consider the range of activities to be employed during the operational phase of the development. The items of plant have been confirmed by Geoplan as those that are expected to be used during all the stated activities.

N 2.0.4 The proposed method of working has been presented within the report and planning application. The following scenarios have been assessed to consider a worst case scenario: • Soil stripping and re-configuration of the earth bund: 1 excavator, 1 dozer and 1 dump truck have been assessed. 10 dump truck movements per hour have been assumed. • Development of benches within the sandstone overburden: 1 excavator, 1 dozer and 3 dump trucks have been assessed. 30 dump truck movements per hour have been assumed. • Extraction of the Etruria Marl: 1 excavator, 1 dozer and 3 dump trucks have been assessed. 30 dump truck movements per hour have been assumed.

N 2.0.5 Receptor locations were selected to represent worst-case residential receptors with respect to direct noise from the proposed development. They are:

• Hockley Hall • 25A Fairway • 13 Fairway • 14 fairway • Hillyfields Farm

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 10 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town And Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

N 3.0 Existing/Baseline Situation

N 3.0.1 A monitoring survey was undertaken to characterise baseline ambient noise levels currently experienced at identified receptor locations. Measurements were taken in general accordance with BS 7445- 1:2003 The Description and Measurement of Environmental Noise: Guide to quantities and procedures.

N 3.0.2 Existing ambient noise levels around the site are influenced by vehicle movement within the quarry, train movement (at ST4) and road traffic noise. The assessment confirms that during the proposed operating

hours background noise levels ranged from 46 to 51 dBLa90,1h.

N 4.0 Predicted Impacts

Soil Stripping and Bund Re-Configuration Phase

N 4.0.1 The assessment shown in the following table compares the worst case average noise levels from quarry activity during the soil stripping and bund re-configuration phases. The Technical Guidance to the National Planning Policy Framework (TG NPPF) states that ‘increased temporary daytime noise limits of up to 70 dB(A) LAeq,1h (free field) for periods of up to 8 weeks in a year at specified noise-sensitive properties should be considered to facilitate essential site preparation and restoration work and construction of baffle mounds where it is clear that this will bring longer-term environmental benefits to the site or its environs. As such, the relevant criteria adopted during this phase is 70 dBLAeq,1h.

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 11 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town And Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

Predicted Noise Levels – Soil Stripping and Bund Re-configuration

Receptor Noise level from MPS2 Noise Within NPPF Location Quarry Activity Assessment Criteria LAeq1h Criteria LAeq1h (Yes/No) R1 53.6 70.0 Yes R2 47.7 70.0 Yes R3 47.3 70.0 Yes R4 46.2 70.0 Yes R5 51.8 70.0 Yes

N 4.0.2 The assessment shows that noise levels at nearby residential receptors during the preliminary phases of the development are predicted to be with TG NPPF criteria at all times.

Overburden Removal Phase

N 4.0.3 The assessment shown in the following tables compares the worst case average noise levels from quarry activity during the overburden removal phase. An assessment has been made at the northern most and eastern most locations where this activity will occur to present a worst case scenario in relation to the location of the closest identified receptors.

Predicted Noise Levels – Overburden removal – northern part of proposal area Receptor Noise level MPS2 Noise Within NPPF Location from Quarry Assessment Criteria Activity Criteria LAeq1h (Yes/No) LAeq1h R1 52.3 55.0 Yes R2 47.3 55.0 Yes R3 49.3 55.0 Yes R4 50.0 55.0 Yes R5 52.7 55.0 Yes

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 12 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town And Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

Predicted Noise Levels – Overburden removal – eastern part of proposal area

Receptor Noise level MPS2 Noise Within NPPF Location from Quarry Assessment Criteria Activity Criteria LAeq1h (Yes/No) LAeq1h R1 52.2 55.0 Yes R2 49.1 55.0 Yes R3 51.0 55.0 Yes R4 50.7 55.0 Yes R5 49.7 55.0 Yes

N 4.0.4 The assessment shows that noise levels at nearby residential receptors are predicted to be with TG NPPF criteria at all times during the overburden removal phase.

Extraction Phase

N 4.0.5 The assessment shown in the following tables compares the worst case average noise levels from quarry activity during the extraction phase. An assessment has been made of extraction occurring at the top and bottom of the face where this activity will occur to present a worst case scenario in relation to the location of receptors.

Predicted Noise Levels – Extraction – Top of Face

Receptor Noise level MPS2 Noise Within NPPF Location from Quarry Assessment Criteria Activity Criteria LAeq1h (Yes/No) LAeq1h R1 51.2 55.0 Yes R2 45.8 55.0 Yes R3 49.2 55.0 Yes R4 50.4 55.0 Yes R5 50.6 55.0 Yes

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 13 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town And Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

Predicted Noise Levels – Extraction – Bottom of Face

Receptor Noise level MPS2 Noise Within NPPF Location from Quarry Assessment Criteria Activity Criteria LAeq1h (Yes/No) LAeq1h R1 38.7 55.0 Yes R2 34.5 55.0 Yes R3 40.6 55.0 Yes R4 41.8 55.0 Yes R5 33.4 55.0 Yes

N 4.0.6 The assessment shows that noise levels at nearby residential receptors during the extraction of the Etruria Marl are predicted to be with TG NPPF criteria at all times.

N 5.0 Proposed Mitigation

N 5.0.1 In view of the above, no additional mitigation measures are considered necessary or recommended in the assessment.

N 6.0 Significance Of Residual Impacts/Conclusions

N 6.0.1 The report presents the details of a noise assessment of the development proposals. Existing background noise levels have been measured.

N 6.0.2 A worst case quarry noise assessment has been undertaken with regard to both temporary working (including soil stripping and bund re-configuration) and normal activities (overburden removal and extraction) in accordance with the NPPF.

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 14 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town And Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

N 6.0.3 Noise levels from the proposed activities are predicted to be within TG NPPF criteria at all times during the proposed quarry operating hours.

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 15 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town And Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

Dust

D 1.0 Introduction

D 1.0.1 White Young Green has been commissioned to undertake an environmental dust study to assess the effects of dust from the proposed amendments to approved quarry development drawings. A full copy of the assessment is attached as Tab 6.

D 2.0 Methodology

D 2.0.1 The assessment methodology used for the Air Quality assessment is based on that described in the Technical Guidance to the National Planning Policy Framework.

D 2.0.2 The Mineral Policy section of the Technical Guidance to the National Planning Policy Framework describes the 4 ‘Key stages’ of a dust assessment study as:

• establish baseline conditions of the existing dust climate around the site of the proposed operations;

• identify site activities that could lead to dust emission without mitigation;

• identify site parameters which may increase potential impacts from dust; and

• recommend mitigation measures, including modification of site design.

D 2.0.3 The assessment utilises the above detailed stages to identify the potential effect of dust emissions from the proposed development on sensitive receptor locations.

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 16 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town And Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

Magnitude of Impact

D 2.0.4 The assessment confirms that the magnitude (scale of change) of an impact is determined by considering the predicted deviation from baseline conditions. Quantifiable assessment of magnitude has been undertaken where possible.

D 2.0.5 Impacts of the proposed development on dust have been assessed with reference to the baseline conditions and environmental assessment criteria.

Sensitivity of Receptors

D 2.0.6 Receptors can demonstrate different sensitivities to changes in their environment. For the purpose of the assessment, sensitivity is determined as ‘Very High’, ‘High’, ‘Medium’ or ‘Low’.

Assessment of Impact Significance

D 2.0.7 The interaction of magnitude and sensitivity will determine the significance of an environmental effect. If the scale of the impact magnitude is negative, then the resulting effect is adverse. If the scale of the impact magnitude is positive, then the resulting effect is beneficial.

D 3.0 Existing/Baseline Situation

D 3.0.1 The use of background concentrations within the modelling process ensures that pollutant sources other than traffic are represented appropriately. Background sources of pollutants include industrial, domestic and rail emissions within the vicinity of the study site.

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 17 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town And Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

D 3.0.2 Background concentrations, as used within the prediction calculations, were referenced from the UK National Air Quality Information Archive database based on the National Grid Co- ordinates of 1 x 1 km grid squares nearest to the development site. In August 2012, Defra issued updated 2010 background maps for PM10 (fine particles) and PM2.5 (very fine particles) which incorporate updates to the input data used for modelling.

D 3.0.3 For the Wilnecote site the PM10 concentrations ranged from 16.44 to 3 19.21(mg/m ) and for PM2.5 between 11.25 and 13.2. These figures indicate that relevant air quality objectives were not exceeded during 2010 at the site.

Sensitive Receptors

D 3.0.4 The following sensitive receptors were identified and assessed:

• Hockley Hall

• 25A Fairway

• 13 Fairway

• 14 Fairway

• Hillyfields Farm

D 3.0.5 The potential effects of the proposed development on ecological receptors have also been considered. A desktop assessment of ‘Designated’ ecological receptors (as defined within the Design Manual for Roads and Bridges Guidance on Air Quality Assessments) has been undertaken as well as a review of other potentially sensitive ecological receptors such as Local Nature Reserves and Ancient Woodland. Following a search within a 1km radius of the site boundary, the following sites were identified:

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 18 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town And Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

• To the East/north-east Kettle Brook Local Nature Reserve (LNR)

• To the north-west Dosthill Park (LNR)

D 4.0 Predicted Impacts

D 4.0.1 The activities associated with the proposed development will include:

• Site preparation; • Material excavation and associated earth works; • Material import and export; • Temporary stockpiling of materials; and, • Associated vehicle movements.

D 4.0.2 Potential air quality impacts associated with the proposed development have been identified as:

• Generation of dust emissions on-site as a result of windblown material;

• Generation of exhaust emissions from road traffic, including Heavy Goods Vehicle (HGV) movements involved with the off- site transport of material.

D 4.0.3 During operation the potential for dust to be emitted will be directly influenced by the nature of the activities taking place on-site. Vehicle movements will be generated on-site during the transport of materials, these have the potential to cause ‘the re-suspension of dust due to vehicle-produced turbulence, especially in dry and windy meteorological conditions.

D 4.0.4 Temporary elevation in dust levels may arise on an intermittent basis as part of the proposed development. This is more likely when the

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 19 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town And Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

proposed activities are undertaken during dry and/or windy meteorological conditions. The magnitude of the potential impact and environmental effects resulting depends on the potential for dust to become and remain airborne prior to returning to the surface as a deposit. Unlike other atmospheric pollutants, the presence of dust and its deposition is particularly dependant on distance to discrete receptors and prevailing weather conditions, with areas most consistently affected being located downwind of emission sources.

D 4.0.5 Analysis of meteorological data from Penkridge meteorological site has been undertaken to determine the climatic conditions of the development in order to assess the potential for dust suppression at the site.

D.4.0.6 Climatic data is available from the Met Office for Penkridge which includes average temperatures, days of air frost, sunshine, rainfall and wind speed from the period 1981 to 2010. Included within this analysis is the number of days with rainfall greater than 1mm.

D 4.0.7 Although 0.2mm rainfall a day is considered sufficient to effectively suppress wind-blown emissions analysing the days with greater than 1mm can be considered a robust approach. The data confirms that

the average number of days with rainfall greater than 1mm is fairly constant throughout the year with slightly more during the months November to January. Based on the climatic rainfall data it is considered that suppression of dust due to meteorological conditions is likely for 34.3% of the year.

D 4.0.8 Wind rose metrological data for 2011 from Coleshill indicates that the prevailing winds are mainly from the south/south-east through from the south-west. An assessment of the significance of dust emission

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 20 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town And Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

from the development has been undertaken and is presented in the following table:

Receptor Type Sensitivity Direction Approx Wind Frequency ID Description Category From Site Distance % All Winds (% from Site Directional Boundary Winds ›3.1m/s R1 Hockley Hall Residential High East 80 8.6% (67%) R2 25A Fairway Residential High North East 150 5.1% (42%) R3 13 Fairway Residential High North 140 7.5% (67%) R4 14 Fairway Residential High North 170 7.5% (67%) R5 Hillyfields Farm Residential High North East 110 9.8% (40.1%)

D 4.0.9 The potential for dust impacts has been assessed as being ‘imperceptible’ in magnitude at all identified receptors. The unmitigated impact significance is therefore predicted to be ‘negligible’, in accordance with the stated assessment methodology.

D 4.0.10 Exhaust emissions from proposed plant involved with works on the proposed development site have the potential to generate emissions to air.

D 4.0.11 Given the limited number of on-site plant, the potential impact of temporary construction plant exhaust emissions has been assessed as being imperceptible in magnitude to local sensitive receptors, as it is considered unlikely that concentrations of exhaust pollutants would increase by more than 1% of the relevant AQO. The unmitigated impact significance is therefore predicted to be negligible, in accordance with the stated assessment methodology.

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 21 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town And Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

D 5.0 Proposed Mitigation

D 5.0.1 The following mitigation measures are recommended in order to reduce the significance of the potential impacts of activities at the Wilnecote site on local sensitive receptors:

• Site screening by bunding, vegetation or barriers should be implemented to minimise the likelihood of dust pick-up and as such limit dust transport beyond the site boundary. The existing bund will be reconfigured along the eastern boundary of the site.

• Any vehicles carrying material to and from the site will be fully sheeted prior to arrival/departure.

• The access road and haul routes will be regularly inspected to identify accumulations of dust, visible emissions of dust or damage. Appropriate steps shall be taken to remove or treat dust accumulations or emissions in the event of visible emissions being identified, including the availability of a mechanical sweeper.

• An appropriate water source for the suppression of visible sources of wind blown dust (such as a water bowser) will be available at short notice for use in the event of spillage or unacceptable visible emissions.

• All vehicles on the site will travel at 10mph or less and 10 mph speed limit signs will be appropriately displayed.

• Site sequencing, where possible, such as conducting main dust causing activities in close proximity to sensitive receptors during spring and autumn.

• Daily checks of dust conditions will be undertaken together with a site walkover by the site manager to ensure that all dust sources are identified and minimised to an acceptable level.

• Meteorological forecasts will be monitored, particularly during periods of proposed soil stripping, to ensure that enough

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 22 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town And Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

provision (water and labour) is made to accommodate dust suppression.

• Wherever possible, loading/unloading will take place at sheltered points around overburden stockpiles to prevent entrainment of dust in the wind.

• Stockpiles heights and profiles will be managed in order to minimise wind entrainment of dust.

• Overburden stockpile surfaces will be compacted to reduce the potential of wind entrainment of the material if stockpiles are intended other than for short term storage.

D 6.0 Significance Of Residual Impacts/Conclusions

D 6.0.1 A semi-qualitative assessment of the predicted air quality effects of the proposals has been undertaken in order to determine the potential effects of the development.

D 6.0.2 The assessment of the significance of deposited dust has determined that the impact significance of the proposed development, following the adoption of recommended mitigation measures, will be ‘negligible’.

D 6.0.3 Based on further consideration of the relative distances of receptors from the development, it has been determined that the risk of local sensitive receptors experiencing nuisance as a result of dust emissions associated with the site will be low.

D 6.0.4 Based on the background concentrations of PM10 being below 20Mg/m3, existing air quality at the Wilnecote site is considered to be good with respect to particulates. The proposed operations are not predicted to increase PM10 concentrations at local sensitive receptors

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 23 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town And Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

to the extent that the national air quality objective of 40Mg/m3 would be exceeded.

D 6.0.5 The proposed development will not increase the volume of traffic along local road network in comparison to previous/current levels, as such the proposed development will result in a negligible impact on local air quality.

D 6.0.6 The assessment demonstrates that the proposals comply with the Technical Guidance to the National Planning Policy Framework.

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 24 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town & Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

Landscape and Visual Impact

L 1.0 Introduction

L 1.0.1 Geoplan have undertaken a Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment of the development proposals. A full copy of the assessment is attached as Tab 7.

L 1.0.2 This landscape and visual impact assessment (LVIA) has been undertaken by a chartered landscape architect (CMLI) with significant experience of landscape and visual assessment across a range of development sectors.

L 2.0 Methodology

L 2.0.1 The methodology which has been employed accords with relevant professional standards and guidelines, including the ‘Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment’ (Landscape Institute and the Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment, 2nd Edition 2002); the ‘Landscape Character Assessment Guidance for England and Scotland’ (Countryside Agency and Scottish Natural Heritage, 2002); ‘The Guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessment (Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment, 2004).

L 2.0.2 The methodology aims to systematically appraise the existing landscape condition, to identify all the significant physical and visual characteristics and assess their quality or value as well as the perceived, visual amenity value. These then provide a baseline against

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 25 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town & Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

which the key landscape and visual effects can be predicted and evaluated and their magnitude and significance assessed in a logical and well reasoned fashion.

L 2.0.3 In order to undertake a full assessment, a number of clear stages of work have been identified and addressed in accordance with the prescribed methodology. These stages include the following:

• a desk study of current plans policy and designations in respect of the site and surrounding area;

• a desk study of existing landscape character assessments for the site and surrounding areas;

• site assessment and identification of the range of landscape and visual receptor groups within the study area;

• an assessment of the sensitivity of the landscape and visual receptors to change;

• an assessment of the magnitude and significance of effects upon the landscape character and visual environment arising from the proposed development;

• an assessment of any mitigation measures incorporated within the proposals to help reduce identified potential landscape and visual effects.

L 3.0 Existing/Baseline Situation

L 3.0.1 The site is located within the existing Wilnecote Quarry located about 3 km south east of Tamworth in Staffordshire. The quarry is an active and part landfilled/restored Etruria Marl quarry which extends to approximately 30Ha in area.

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 26 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town & Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

L 3.0.2 The quarry has been worked to a base depth of approximately 43m AOD which is 45m to 50m below the ground level at the eastern perimeter of the quarry.

L 3.0.3 The assessment confirms that the quarry is located in an urban fringe area which is characterised by residential and industrial development to the west and north, by open countryside to the east and by a mix of industry and countryside to the south.

The closest residential areas to the site are as follows;

• Wilnecote - the centre of the residential area is approximately 1.3Km to the north.

• Hockley - the centre of the residential area is 700m to the north east.

• Dosthill - the centre of the residential area is 0.5Km to the west.

L 3.0.4 Slopes and ridgelines are very prominent in the local landscape, helping to contain this part of Tamworth and separating it from the wider countryside to the south. The land rises from Hedging Lane (70 to 90m AOD) and Gorsy Bank Road (90 to 110m AOD) with up to the highest points of the Whateley area at 120m AOD, which lies within North Warwickshire. A slightly lower ridge lies to the west of Rush Lane on agricultural land, prominent above the current quarry workings when viewed from within Wilnecote or Dosthill.

L 3.0.5 From within the urban areas, in Hockley, Wilnecote and parts of Dosthill, the ridgelines form an important skyline landscape feature to the south which enables views of open countryside from within residential areas. The south and east faces of the existing quarry are also visible beneath this skyline.

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 27 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town & Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

L 3.0.6 The assessment confirms that the site lies within the Greenbelt, but the National Planning Policy Framework identifies mineral extraction as a form of development that is not inappropriate in Greenbelt.

L 3.0.7 The Countryside Agency (now Natural England) methodology (Landscape Character Assessment Guidance, 2002) provides a description of the landscape character of England and provides a national and regional framework for more detailed assessments carried out at County, District or Unitary Authority level. The landscape character context within which the quarry is located is Landscape Character Area 97, ‘Arden’.

L 3.0.8 The assessment considered landscape and conservation designations that apply to the site.

Conservation Areas The site does not lie within a designated Conservation Area. The two closest Conservation Areas are;

• Wilnecote - 1.5Km north

• Dosthill – 1.2Km west

Listed Buildings The closest Listed Buildings are as follows;

• Hockley Hall - Grade II, (buildings and structures) 120m east.

• Whately Hall Farmhouse - Grade II, 600m south east.

Although there is currently limited inter visibility between Hockley Hall and the eastern screen bund and overburden storage area the assessment confirms that there would be no additional visual effect from the proposed development. There would also be no physical

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 28 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town & Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

effects upon the Hall or its associated outbuilding or its setting. There would be no physical or visual effects upon Whatley Hall Farmhouse.

Registered Historic Parks and Gardens There are no local Registered Parks and Gardens which have intervisibility with the Site.

Scheduled Monuments No Scheduled Monuments have intervisibility with the Site.

Ancient Woodland There would be no physical or visual effects from the proposed development upon any ancient woodland.

SSSI There would be no physical or visual effects from the proposed development upon any SSSIs.

L 3.0.9 The assessment provides an assessment of the extent of visibility of the proposed development. The visibility of the existing quarry is influenced primarily by the combination of local topography and its location within the urban edge of Tamworth. Urban areas to the west and north, contrast with agricultural rural area to the south and east. The proposed extraction area is currently characterised by the worked but unrestored faces of the existing quarry which rise from variable base levels circa 40m AOD rising to and including the eastern perimeter screen bund at circa 95m AOD.

L 3.0.10 The assessment summarises the visual baseline position as follows (as illustrated on Fig. 2):

• the site is located within the existing Wilnecote Quarry.

• the existing face has intervisibility with the urban areas of Dosthill to the west and Wilnecote to the north.

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 29 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town & Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

• the screen bund screens views from Hockley.

• mature scrub woodland is located immediately to the north of the quarry which screens views of the quarry from Hockley Road and Hedging Lane.

• the existing quarry is visible from Gorsey Road although the proposed development area would only be visible where operations occur at and above ground level.

• the eastern boundary of the existing quarry is located on the edge of agricultural elevated ground to the south and east of the urban edge of Tamworth.

• immediately to the south of the existing quarry perimeter bunds to the landfill operation screen views of the Site, from the south.

• Hockley Road located to the east of the Site is bordered by hedgerows and woodland which restrict views to the quarry.

• existing quarrying related operations at ground level on the eastern boundary form the baseline visual context within which the extension should be considered.

• the main rail line linking Tamworth with Nottingham and Birmingham runs along the western boundary of the quarry.

L 3.0.11 The assessment identifies key visual receptor groups such as settlements, residential properties, roads and public rights of way and provides an appraisal from a number of representative viewpoints.

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 30 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town & Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

L 4.0 Predicted Impacts

L 4.0.1 The LVIA assesses the potential landscape and visual effects of the proposed development on the site, the surrounding landscape and conservation features.

Site

L 4.0.2 Site preparation and stripping operations for the proposed extension development area will involve the removal of existing overburden, stockpiles and regrading to the existing screen bund at and above ground level on the eastern perimeter of the quarry. Once the overburden has been removed the screen bund will be re-contoured to the profiles illustrated on drawing W22-39. Landscape character and function will remain as the existing baseline. This localised work will not alter the existing character of the eastern perimeter of the quarry.

L 4.0.3 A small topsoil bund located in the south east corner of the quarry will be relocated to the northern end of the regraded screen bund. The operation will not change the baseline landscape character of the Site.

L 4.0.4 The proposal includes the development of an access road which links the proposed development area with the main quarry void as illustrated on W22-39. The access road will require the removal of several trees within an area of approximately 350m2 at the western extremity of the woodland block to the north east of the quarry void. The scale of this operation and its location indicate that the removal of the trees proposed will not change the overall character of the local wooded block which separates the quarry from the Hockley Road.

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 31 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town & Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

L 4.0.5 The magnitude of effect upon the proposed extension area is assessed as negligible and the sensitivity of the site is assessed as ‘low’. The overall significance of effect upon the site from the proposed development is therefore assessed as ‘negligible’.

Landscape Effects - The Landscape Character Areas

L 4.0.6 The assessment notes that Wilnecote is a mature operational quarry. The proposed development will result in established quarry benches being moved by only 30m to the east and within the existing operational area which will not change the landscape character.

L 4.0.7 The magnitude of effect upon the local landscape character area from the proposed development is assessed as ‘negligible’ and the sensitivity of the LCA locally is assessed as ‘medium’. The significance of effect upon the ‘Arden’ landscape character area is therefore assessed as ‘negligible’.

Conservation Areas

L 4.0.8 The assessment confirms there will be no effect upon local Conservation Areas.

Listed Buildings

L 4.0.9 The assessment confirms there will be no effect upon Whately Hall Farmhouse. The magnitude of effect upon Hockley Hall is ‘negligible’ and temporary and the sensitivity of the receptor is assessed as ‘high’.

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 32 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town & Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

The significance of effect upon the landscape setting of this Listed Building is therefore assessed as ‘negligible’ in the context of the baseline. Early re-grading and seeding of the perimeter screen bund will mitigate any effect upon the landscape setting of the Hockley Hall.

Registered Historic Parks and Gardens

L 4.0.10 The assessment confirms there will be ‘no effect’ upon any Registered Historic Parks and Gardens.

Scheduled Monuments

L 4.0.11 The assessment confirms there will be ‘no effect’ upon the closest Scheduled Monuments.

Ancient Woodland

L 4.0.12 The assessment confirms no Ancient Woodland would be affected by the proposed development.

SSSI

L 4.0.13 The assessment confirms there will be no effect upon the closest SSSIs.

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 33 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town & Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

Visual Effects

L 4.0.14 An assessment of the potential visual effects of the proposed development on the representative viewpoints both prior to and after any proposed mitigation.

Viewpoint 1 - Sefton Road Dosthill

L 4.0.15 The existing eastern upper quarry face is visible from various locations within the residential development off Sefton Road. It is likely that visual effects will arise from movement of mobile plant undertaking additional work at and close to ground level. The soil and overburden stripping operations will be as existing and will not differ from work previously undertaken on the east face of the quarry. These operations will also be temporary. Clay extraction on the eastern face will be perceived as an extension to existing baseline operations. As such, there will be no greater effects than already experienced within the existing quarry development. Further clay extraction will therefore be perceived in the context of the ongoing quarry development which will include progressive landfill and restoration of the site. The magnitude of visual effect at this viewpoint is assessed as ‘low’. The significance of effect upon this viewpoint is therefore assessed as ‘minor/moderate’ but only whilst the proposed operations take place at or close to ground level. When the clay is being extracted at depth the significance of effect will either be ‘negligible’ or the operation will not be visible.

Viewpoint 2 – Hedging Lane (north side)

L 4.0.16 From Viewpoint 2 the landscape to the south is dominated by the existing quarry, the plant and the naturally colonising scrub woodland on its northern boundary alongside Hedging Lane. It is likely that visual effects will arise from movement of mobile plant undertaking

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 34 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town & Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

additional work at and close to ground level. These operations will not differ however from work previously undertaken on the east face of the quarry. As these properties are relatively new it is unlikely that residents witnessed earlier extraction operations to the east face but have experienced mobile plant undertaking grading operations to the eastern perimeter. The scale of soil and overburden stripping will be as existing and will only be of a temporary nature and will be of a similar nature to recent operations. As such there will be no greater effects than already experienced within the baseline quarry development. The magnitude of visual effect at this viewpoint is assessed as ‘low’. The significance of effect upon this viewpoint is therefore assessed as ‘minor/moderate’ but only whilst the proposed operations take place at or close to ground level. When the clay is being extracted at depth the significance of effect will either be ‘negligible’ or the operation will not be visible.

Viewpoint 3 – Hedging Lane (south side) L 4.0.17 From Viewpoint 3 the landscape to the south is dominated by the woodland located between the rear of the properties and the existing quarry. Visual effects will arise from movement of mobile plant undertaking additional work at and close to ground level. These operations will not differ however from work previously undertaken on the east face of the quarry. The scale of soil and overburden stripping will be as existing, will only be temporary and will be of a similar nature to recent operations. There will be no greater visual effects than already experienced within the baseline quarry development. The magnitude of visual effect at this viewpoint is assessed as ‘low’ and at ground level will be temporary. The significance of effect upon this viewpoint is therefore assessed as ‘minor/moderate’ but only whilst the proposed operations take place at or close to ground level. When the clay is being extracted at depth

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 35 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town & Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

the significance of effect will either be ‘negligible’ or the operation will not be visible.

Viewpoint 4 - Hockley Road

L 4.0.18 There are only occasional oblique views of the Site at this location due to the screening effect from the woodland. The eastern face of the existing quarry is not visible. Visual effects will arise from movement of mobile plant undertaking additional work at and close to ground level. These operations will not differ from work previously undertaken on the eastern perimeter of the quarry. The magnitude of visual effect at this viewpoint is assessed as ‘negligible’ at ground level and temporary. The scale of soil and overburden stripping will be as existing, will only be of a temporary nature and will be of a similar nature to recent operations. The significance of effect upon this viewpoint is therefore assessed as ‘negligible’ but only whilst the proposed operations take place at or close to ground level. When the clay is being extracted at depth the operation will not be visible.

Viewpoint 5 - Houses on Gorsey Bank Road

L 4.0.19 From Viewpoint 5 the existing screen bund on the eastern perimeter of the quarry is visible but the main quarry lies below the local horizon. Visual effects will arise from movement of mobile plant undertaking additional work at and close to ground level. These operations will not differ from work previously undertaken on the eastern perimeter of the quarry. The scale of soil and overburden stripping will only be of a temporary nature and will be of a similar nature to recent operations. The magnitude of visual effect at this viewpoint is assessed as ‘negligible’ at ground level and temporary. The significance of effect upon this viewpoint is therefore assessed as ‘negligible’ but only whilst the proposed operations take place at or

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 36 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town & Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

close to ground level. When the clay is being extracted at depth the operation will not be visible.

Viewpoint 6 – Houses on Gorsey Bank Road

L 4.0.20 This location represents the views from residential properties as well those experienced by pedestrians and road users. The eastern perimeter screen bund and the top of the west face of the existing quarry are visible within a broad elevated urban fringe vista. From this location the screen bund is only a minor feature within the broader landscape and only visible where there are gaps in the roadside hedgerow. The scale of soil and overburden stripping and grading will only be of a temporary nature and will be of a similar nature to recent operations. Extraction of clay from the eastern face will not be visible. The magnitude of visual effect at this viewpoint is assessed as ‘negligible’ at ground level and temporary. The significance of effect upon this viewpoint is therefore assessed as ‘negligible’ but only whilst the proposed operations take place at or close to ground level. When the clay is being extracted at depth the operation will not be visible.

L 5.0 Mitigation

L 5.0.1 The following measures will be adopted in order to minimise impact on the landscape character and visual receptors:

Working and restoration at ground level L 5.0.2 Land take for the proposed working area will be minimised to a 30m wide strip at ground level. This area is already within the operational area and lies beneath a perimeter screen bund. The small scale of operations at ground level will minimise the duration of operations to

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 37 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town & Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

remove surface materials and enable early re-grading of the screen bund mitigating views from the east.

L 5.0.3 The phased working of the quarry benches as detailed on Dwg W22- 39 will take place in the same manner as the quarry has been worked historically.

Early restoration to the eastern perimeter L 5.0.4 Development of the upper quarry benches will release soils and overburden which will be placed to construct the screen bund and create a seed bed for early seeding to the eastern perimeter.

Tree planting L 5.0.5 Trees will be planted in the eastern woodland block to replace those removed to accommodate the proposed access road. Trees species planted will be in accordance with the local landscape character guidelines. Replacement planting of trees will take place at a ratio of two new trees for each existing one lost.

Retention of Existing Vegetation L 5.0.6 All existing woodland to be retained on the boundary of the proposed development area will be protected and managed appropriately to ensure that it does not suffer damage during site stripping, quarrying and restoration operations.

Seeding L 5.0.7 All areas at and above ground level including the screen bund which are re-graded and reworked will be restored and seeded with an appropriate grass seed mix at the first appropriate opportunity.

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 38 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town & Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

L 6.0 Significance of Residual Impacts/Conclusions

L 6.0.1 Landscape and Visual Assessment has been conducted for the development proposals. The significance of effects on landscape site features, landscape character, views from representative properties, roads and recreational areas has been assessed and the conclusions are as follows:

L 6.0.2 Due to the nature of the proposed extension and the extent and maturity of mineral extraction operations at Wilnecote this assessment has concluded that the landscape effects upon the site, its fabric and upon the local landscape character would be negligible. The proposed changes will effectively revisit existing and previously worked areas with little perceptible change to the visual baseline.

L 6.0.3 The proposed quarry development would have no effect upon any landscape designations or any local Conservation Areas, Listed Buildings, Historic Parks and Gardens, or local Scheduled Monuments. It would also have no effect upon any local Ancient Woodland or SSSIs

L 6.0.4 The main visual effect will arise from the re-grading of the eastern screen bund and the removal of overburden from a 30m wide area on the eastern boundary to the existing quarry. This will require the presence of mobile plant working on the eastern perimeter of the existing quarry. The earthworks operations will be for a limited period of time and will be entirely consistent with permitted operations which have recently taken place in this area.

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 39 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town & Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

L 6.0.5 The key visual receptors will be those residents in the new properties to the north of Hedging Lane (viewpoint 2) who have close open views of the quarry eastern boundary. These residents will have occupied the dwellings relatively recently and as such have only limited experience of the quarrying operations at Wilnecote. They will however have already witnessed earth moving operations of a similar nature and the proposed development will be perceived as an extension of this baseline. At this location the significance of visual effect is assessed as being only minor to moderate and for a limited period whilst operations take place at ground level. Thereafter the significance of effect will be reduced to negligible as the working scheme progresses in the existing quarry void.

L 6.0.6 A similar significance of effect is also recorded for viewpoints 1 and 3 for the reasons described above.

L 6.0.7 The significance of visual effect upon receptors to the east (viewpoints 4, 5 and 6) is assessed as negligible whilst operations take place at ground level. When the extraction operations take place on the eastern face of the quarry void they will not be visible from these locations.

L 6.0.8 Views of the re-grading operations from Hockley Hall, which is currently unoccupied, would be similar to those experienced for permitted operations and only for the limited period of time as described previously. Thereafter extraction operations to the eastern face would not be visible. Eventually the local landscape will be restored to its previous rural character.

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 40 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town & Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

L 6.0.9 The screen bund which will be re-graded to maintain its existing function within a narrower footprint will not in itself be visually intrusive within the context of the local landscape. It will eventually be removed as the site is restored in accordance with the Biffa landfilling operations.

L 6.0.10 The nature and extent of the proposal considered in the context of the existing permitted development indicates that the proposed development will be almost imperceptible from locations in the surrounding landscape.

L 6.0.11 The assessment therefore concludes that the significance of landscape and visual effect from the development proposals will be negligible.

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 41 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town and Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

Ecology

E 1.0 Introduction

E 1.0.1 Philip Parker associates, ecological consultants, have been commissioned to undertake an ecological assessment of the site. A full copy of their report is attached as Tab 8.

E 2.0 Methodology

E 2.0.1 The assessment is largely based on protected species survey work that was undertaken from March to July 2011, with follow up surveys undertaken in March and April 2012, and January 2013. Where appropriate, changes to the site (from that surveyed in 2011 to the subsequent surveys) are identified.

E 2.0.2 The site has been divided into 6 separate compartments, all of which have been subject to survey at one time of other (and shown on Drawing P2013 - 07 D2 in the full report. The planning application only directly affects 3 of these compartments but all of the survey information for the application is included to put the interest of the overall site into context.

E 2.0.3 Given the habitats present on site, the following species/groups were considered the most likely to occur on site and therefore survey over the period has concentrated particularly on these.

• Badger • Water Voles • Bats • Breeding birds • Reptiles

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 42 Geoplan Limited

Wilnecote Quarry Town and Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

• Great crested newts

E 3.0 Existing/Baseline Situation

E 3.1 The assessment confirms that existing habitats present on the site are

as follows:

E 3.0.1 Area 1 The western part of the area is an area of previously worked quarry with Ditch D1 running through from north to south. Ditch D1 was moved in summer 2011 following the 2011 surveys to the edge of the excavation area. The eastern part comprises an area of rough grassland and a short length of hedgerow running from west to east. Two storage bunds are located in this area.

E 3.0.2 Area 2 This comprises an area of rough grassland and scrub abutting Woodland W2 on the eastern boundary. A small pond P2 is located at the northern edge. The area also includes an extension of D1 (the ditch running through Area 1). Following survey in 2011 a small area of rough grassland on the southern part of Area 2 was stripped and the haul road was realigned below the profile of the working edge. This area also includes the small triangle which will form a minor extension (for construction of a haul road) within the proposed planning application.

E 3.0.3 Area 3 This comprises an area of rough grassland and scrub that dominated by common broom Cytisus scoparius. Contained within the boundary at the northern end is P5 and D3 whilst P7 is in the north west corner. This area is under the control of Biffa.

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 43 Geoplan Limited

Wilnecote Quarry Town and Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

E 3.0.4 Area 4 This comprises an area of former rough grassland, now being used by Biffa as an overburden deposition site. The area abuts W1 on its western boundary. A former pond P6, located in the north eastern corner, was filled in following survey and clearance of any (non- protected) amphibians.

E 3.0.5 Area 5 The base of the quarry comprises a series of bare benches and shallow, temporary water bodies. Due to the changing nature of this area, there is little vegetation present, although the western slope has become partly vegetated as there are no operational working faces in this area.

E 3.0.6 Area 6 To the north of the quarry is an area of rough grassland and scrub, bordered to the northwest by Ditch D4 and D2 on the south western boundary. This area includes Pond P4 (Silt Settlement Pond) and Ditch D4 (on the northwest boundary). A further pond is located to the north (P3) but this is fenced off and the ownership is unknown.

E 3.0.7 Woodland W1 This comprises an area of woodland running north – south on the western boundary of the site and abutting area 4. It comprises mostly of silver birch Betula pendula, alder Alnus glutinosa, sycamore Acer pseudoplatus and hawthorn Crataegus monogyna and has grown over a screening bund providing good habitat for breeding birds.

E 3.0.8 Woodland W2 This lies on the eastern side of the site. Damp wood is dominated by mature willow Salix species and due to its open nature has a good range of plants growing beneath them with various sedges Carex sp,

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 44 Geoplan Limited

Wilnecote Quarry Town and Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

nettles Urtica dioica, grasses and dock Rumex sp dominating. Pond P1 is located within W2.

E 3.1 Existing Records Records have been obtained from the MAGIC website and also the Staffordshire Wildlife Trust. Details of the records can be found in Appendix A of the full assessment. A summary is given below.

E 3.2 Staffordshire Wildlife Trust identified the following wildlife sites within 3km of the site (SP22118 99943);

Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI)

• Kingsbury Brickworks SSSI – located 345m to the south of the site

• Kingsbury Wood SSSI – located 1.9km south east of the site

Local Nature Reserve (LNR)

• Dosthill Park LNR – located 782m north west of the site • Kettle Brook LNR – located 1.09km north east of the site

RSPB Reserve

• Middleton Lakes RSPB Reserve – located 1.17km west of the site

Biodiversity Alert Sites (BAS) and Local Wildlife Sites (LWS)

• Kettle Brook BAS – 1.09km north east of the site • Dosthill Quarry Grassland BAS – 960m west of the site • Brook End LWS – 1.87km north west of the site • Fazeley LWS – 2.37km north west of the site • Tameside Nature Reserve LWS – 2.40km north west of the site • Dosthill Park LWS – 959m north west of the site • Beauchamp Industrial Park LWS – 1.48km north west of the site

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 45 Geoplan Limited

Wilnecote Quarry Town and Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

• Hockley (west of) LWS – Borders the north eastern boundary of the site

• Stoneydelph Wet Woodland LWS – 1.71km north east of the site • Dosthill Quarries LWS – 1.17km west of the site • Hockley Clay Pit (west of) LWS – borders the site to the west

E 3.2.2 Of the above sites, 2 border the quarry site;

• Local Wildlife Site (LWS) 20/20/41, Hockley (west of) which is an open mosaic on previously developed land that is being colonised by species-rich neutral grassland and scrub, and appears to include part of Areas 2 and 6 to the north east of the site.

• Local Wildlife Site (LWS) 29/19/87, Beauchamp Industrial Park, an open mosaic on previously developed land which is being colonised by neutral grassland, borders the quarry site to the west.

E 3.3 Staffordshire Wildlife Trust identified the following species within 3km of the site (SP22118 99943);

E 3.4 Mammals

• Bat species – 1 record, generally Dosthill, 2003 • Pipistrelle species – 8 records, 1 Drayton Manor Park, 2002, 1 Faxeley Canal Aqueduct, 2001, 1 Fazeley, 1992, 2 Dosthil, latest 2002, 2 Stoneydelph, latets 1995

• Daubentons bat – 2 records, 1 Draytonmanor Park, 2002, 1 Fazeley Canal Aqueduct, 2001

• Whiskered bat – 1 record, Dosthill Park, 2001 • Noctule bat – 3 records, 1 Fezeley Canal, 2001, 2 Dosthill Park, latest 2002

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 46 Geoplan Limited

Wilnecote Quarry Town and Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

• Otter – 31 records, 18 no site name, latest 2006, 1 Fazeley, 2006, 1 Brook End, 2006, 1 Bourne Brook Fazeley, 1910, 1 River Tame, 2009, 1 Langley Brook, 2002, 3 Birmingham and Fazeley Canal, latest 2006, 1 Drayton Bassett Pits Tamworth, 2006, 3 Dosthill Quarries, latest 2007, 1 Middleton Lakes, 2008

• Badger – 4 records, no site name, latest 2011 • Water vole – 6 records, 2 Tameside Nature Reserve, latest 2007, 4 Kettle Brook, latest 2004

E 3.5 Reptiles

• Grass snake – 20 records, 2 Dosthill Quarries latest 2007, 1 Dosthill, 1970 – 1977, 3 Drayton Bassett, latest 2006, 1 Fayeley, 1966m 1 Staffordshire, 1978, 3 Birmingham and Fazeley Canal, 2009, 3 Fazeley, latest 2003, 1 no site name, 2007, 1 River Tame Aqueduct, 2000, 1 Kettlebrook, 2003, 1 Hockley, 1970 – 1977, 2 Drayton Bassett Pits, latest 2011

• Common lizard – 1 record, Tamworth Borough, 1960

E 3.6 Birds

• Barn owl – 25 records, 15 Drayton Bassett Pits, latest 2008, 6 Middleton Lakes RSPB, latest 2011, 1 Dosthill Gravel Pit, 2002, 1 Dosthill, 2006, 1 Tameside Nature Reserve, 2011, 1 Tamworth Borough, 2007

E 3.7 Badger As badgers have been recorded, details are included in a separate report to prevent interference.

E 3.8 Water Vole Staffordshire Wildlife Trust provided 6 records, 2 Tameside Nature Reserve, latest 2007, 4 Kettle Brook, latest 2004. There are a small

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 47 Geoplan Limited

Wilnecote Quarry Town and Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

number of water vole records from local sites but none for near the quarry.

E 3.8.1 A water vole survey was undertaken in March 2011. All ditches crossing or bordering the proposed development and haul route area were assessed for the presence of water voles. The survey included looking for evidence of burrows, latrines, droppings, feeding stations and runways.

E 3.8.2 No evidence of water voles was noted in any of the drains and ponds during the course of the survey and they were largely considered unsuitable for this species to occur. No subsequent all encompassing survey has been undertaken but no evidence has been noted as port of the other surveys.

E 3.9 Bats

Staffordshire Wildlife Trust provided the following records;

• Daubentons bat – 2 records, 1 Draytonmanor Park, 2002, 1 Fazeley Canal Aqueduct, 2001

• Whiskered bat – 1 record, Dosthill Park, 2001 • Noctule bat – 3 records, 1 Fezeley Canal, 2001, 2 Dosthill Park, latest 2002

E 3.9.1 In summer, bats typically roost in trees and buildings. They typically feed along hedgerows, woodland edge and over water. In winter, they generally hibernate in caves, cellars, tunnels and ice houses.

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 48 Geoplan Limited

Wilnecote Quarry Town and Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

E 3.9.2 The survey involved two elements:

• Checking the site for likely roost and hibernation sites; • Evening surveys to identify any bats in flight and feeding corridors.

E 3.9.3 Trees were surveyed from ground level using 8 x 40mm binoculars. Where any identified features were accessible, these were inspected from extending ladders using a Seesnake Endoscope where appropriate.

E 3.9.4 Trees were surveyed to the categories as set out in the latest Bat Survey Guidelines (BCT 2012) which suggest categorising trees into the following categories:

E 3.9.5 Known or confirmed roost

• Category 1* (Tree with multiple suitable features such as holes, cracks, splits and loose bark capable of supporting larger roosts

• Category 1 (Tree with defined bat potential supporting fewer features than 1*)

• Category 2 (Tree with no obvious potential but tree of size and age that features could be present at a higher level

• Category 3 (Tree with no bat roost potential)

E 3.9.6 On the 22nd March 2011, trees within or close to areas likely to be affected by future works (ie the eastern boundary of the site around areas 1, 2, 7 and W2) were inspected for their potential as a bat roost. Only trees that were considered to have any bat roost potential are shown in Table 2 below.

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 49 Geoplan Limited

Wilnecote Quarry Town and Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

Table 2 Potential bat roost survey

TREE AREA Grid Species Hole Crack Loose Broke Ivy Value ref s s bark n limbs T1 2 SP Qr X X 1* 22398 Mature 99977 T2 2 SP Qr X X X 1* 22404 Dead (dead) 99994

E 3.9.7 The assessment confirms that hedgerows and woodland themselves do provide potential corridors for bat movement across the site. As a result of the above assessment, three emergence and return to roost surveys for bats was undertaken around trees T1 and T2 on 10th May 2011, 24th May 2011 and 8th June 2011 (the optimum survey period being May to September).

E 3.9.8 No bats were seen to emerge or return to these trees during the three visits. Individual Common pipistrelle Pipistrellus pipistrellus, were detected foraging along the edge of the site in this area.

E 3.9.10 During the amphibian surveys a bat detector was left running near to these survey trees and when analysed only low level activity of Common pipistrelle was noted.

E 3.9.11 Subsequently, after further physical surveys in March 2012, Tree T1 was removed, utilising the soft felling procedure.

E 3.10 Breeding Birds

Staffordshire Wildlife Trust provided the following records;

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 50 Geoplan Limited

Wilnecote Quarry Town and Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

E 3.10.1 The site was surveyed by walking the site recording the presence of any nests or any nesting behaviour either in the fields of the boundary features. This included singing and calling birds, carrying food, fecal sacs etc. All birds and any activity was recorded on a site map.

E 3.10.2 A survey of birds present on the site was undertaken on all visits between the 22nd March 2011 and 8th June 2011. A total of 43 species were recorded (a full list can be found in Appendix C). The usual mix of hedgerow species were present as well as grassland species in low numbers, also birds associated with ponds and rivers were noted. Some of these species are of national concern. The distribution of the principle (red and amber) species is given in the following table.

Table 3 Notable birds recorded Species Grade Description

Mallard Amber list Pairs noted at areas1, 2 and 4 Female with young on P1. Breeder. Kestrel Amber list Single birds seen around site. Lesser black-backed Amber list 25 plus birds on area 3 then on passage to gull nearby tip. Black headed gull Amber list 10 plus on area 3 then passage to nearby tip. Common tern Amber list Bird on passage over area 3. Stock Dove Amber list 4 birds feeding in area 2. Meadow pipit Amber list 4 birds on area 3 probable passage migrant. Yellow wagtail Red list Bird on passage in area 3. Dunnock Amber list Singing bird from suitable habitat noted around area1. Resident breeder. Wheatear Amber list Single bird on passage on area 3.

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 51 Geoplan Limited

Wilnecote Quarry Town and Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

Species Grade Description

Song thrush Red list A single bird singing from hedge around Area 2. Probable breeder. Linnet Red list Two pairs noted in Area 3. Probable breeder. Common Amber list Birds singing from suitable habitat in all whitethroat areas. Probable breeder. Willow warbler Amber list Birds singing from areas 2 and 4 and from P1 . Probable breeder. Reed bunting Amber list A singing male and several females seen around area 3. Probable breeder.

E 3.10.3 The site and adjacent area would appear to be of local value for local bird populations with the principle areas being the 2 woodlands (W1 and W2) and also Area 6 around P4. Area 3 also attracted a diverse breeding bird population due to the presence of scrub. The main part of the quarry subject to this planning application (Area 5) did not have a significant bird population due to the generl lack of habitat. The small extension area within Area 2 contained bird nesting potential through scrub and a pile of previously cut and stacked timber.

E 3.11 Reptiles

The Staffordshire Wildlife Trust provided the following records;

• Common lizard – 1 record, Tamworth Borough, 1960

E 3.11.1 The reptile survey comprised two separate techniques:

• Direct observation and Hanson Building Products Limited Page 52 Geoplan Limited

Wilnecote Quarry Town and Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

• The use of artificial refuges (“tins”).

E 3.11.2 These two methods complemented each other and were carried out at the same time. Direct observation involved searching favoured habitats for reptiles. They can often be found on sunny, open and disturbed areas or underneath refuges such as logs/rocks/sheets of metal etc.

E 3.11.3 Artificial refuges were a mixture of corrugated tin and roofing felt, approximately 50cm x 50cm in size. They were placed at a minimum density of 10 refuges per hectare (Gent 1998).

E 3.11.4 A survey for reptiles was undertaken April and May 2011 (the optimum time for carrying out such surveys), using visual search and the use of artificial refugia. The refugia were placed in a density in excess of 20/ha (greater than the minimum recommended), in suitable habitat around the site and along hedgerows and ditches as these were assessed as providing the best potential refugia, hibernacula and basking sites.

E 3.11.5 A total of 230 artificial refugia (mats) were put out across the site in the following areas,

• Area 1 - 81 mats • Area 2 - 49 mats (including the proposed small extension) • Area 3 - 75 mats • Area 4 - 25 mats

E 3.11.6 They were left for 4 weeks to settle in before the survey commenced. Survey took place on 7 separate occasions between 6th April 2011 and 25th May 2011.

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 53 Geoplan Limited

Wilnecote Quarry Town and Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

E 3.11.7 Despite the amount of potentially good quality reptile habitat on site, the surveys only found a maximum of 1 adult grass snake Natrix natrix on any single visit (one on Area 4 and one on the edge of Areas 2 and 6).

E 3.11.8 The site is therefore considered to be of low value for reptile populations.

E 3.12 Amphibians

Staffordshire Wildlife Trust did not have any records for amphibians.

E 3.12.1 A combination of survey techniques (bottle trapping, torch lit surveys, netting and egg searches) is normally employed to give a full picture of amphibian activity and to compensate for limitations with any one technique. The use of these techniques on a day-night–day basis, on four occasions, at an appropriate time of year (March to June) should give reasonable evidence of the presence or absence of a particular species of amphibian, with 6 visits required to give a population estimate (necessary for any licence application). Due to the timing of the survey (early July) only two methods were employed, torching and netting and even then due to the size of the site these have only been carried out on one occasion.

E 3.12.2 The torchlight survey involved walking the perimeter and searching the water with a powerful 1 million candle power lamp. All amphibians seen were identified and counted.

E 3.12.3 Amphibian presence and absence surveys were undertaken in spring 2011 for all ponds and ditches on or bordering the current excavation. A total of 7 ponds and 4 ditches were surveyed, their locations are

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 54 Geoplan Limited

Wilnecote Quarry Town and Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

shown on drawing D2. Note that active silt settlement water bodies in the base of the quarry were not surveyed. They were very turbid, shallow and ephemeral in ntaure. An additional pond to the south of Hilly Fields Farm Farm (grid ref SP22575 99961) was not surveyed as access was not possible. However, at this time, the pond was virtually dry.

E 3.12.4 The survey work was undertaken between 22nd March and 8th June 2011. Amphibian distribution is described in the following table.

Table 4 Great crested newt distribution 2011 Pond Ref Area Habitat Great Smooth Other and grid Suitability crested newt peak s peak reference Index newt peak count count P1 W2 0.74 0 3m and 5f 2 frog SK 22423 Good on 6/4/11 99978 P2 2 0.34 0 0 0 SK 22341 Poor 00179 P3 Off Site Not - - - SK 22357 surveyed – 00289 fenced off

P4 6 0.68 2f on 4m and 9f 1 toad SK 22306 Average 22/3/11 smooth on 00253 6/4/11 P5 3 0.60 0 3m and 1f 0 SK 22066 Average on 21/4/11 00063 Pond almost dry by 10/5/11 P6 4 0.67 No 0 0 SP 21956 Average evidence 99944 May 2008, pond dry by 24/7/08. P7 3 0.73 0 9m and 12f 1 frog

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 55 Geoplan Limited

Wilnecote Quarry Town and Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

Pond Ref Area Habitat Great Smooth Other and grid Suitability crested newt peak s peak reference Index newt peak count count SP 21973 Good on 6/4/11. 99916 All vegetation removed on next visit 10/05/11 D1 2 0.7 0 2m and 2f 1 frog SP 22310 Good on 22/3/11. 99888 109 larvae were netted prior to it being filled in on 4/7/11 D2 5 0.86 1m on 1m on Excellent 22/3/11. SK 22194 6/4/11 00200 D3 3 0.57 0 0 0 Below SK 22036 average 99979 D4 6 0.73 4m and 2f 2m and 5 f 1 frog Good SK 22278 on 21/4/11 on 24/5/11 00254

E 3.12.5 The site supports a small population of great crested newts, centred on Pond P4, D2 and D4 (the northern edge of the site).

E 3.12.6 None of these features will be affected by proposed future quarrying. Optimal great crested newt foraging habitat occurs in the rough grassland around P4 (Area 6). The main quarry void is largely devoid of vegetation apart from an isolated area of vegetation on the profiled

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 56 Geoplan Limited

Wilnecote Quarry Town and Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

western elevation of the quarrry and therefore provides unsuitable terrestrial habitat for great crested newts.

E 4.0 Predicted Impacts

E 4.1 AREA 1

E 4.1.1 The area into which the upper benches are proposed to extend (Planning permission T/05/08/905MW) is currently occupied by soil bunds. This was surveyed/assessed for badgers, breeding birds, bats and reptiles in 2011, but apart from breeding birds in the dividing hedgerow, had little potential for protected species to occur. No protected species were noted. The field is more than 250m away from the pond and ditches where great crested newts were identified. Another pond is located off site some 115m to the east but this was virtually dry in 2011 and considered unsuitable.

E 4.2 AREA 2 – Proposed New Haul Road

The area of the proposed haul road comprises a small amount of scrub including bramble Rubus fruticosis, elder Sambusus nigra and hawthorn Crataegus monogyna with several immature oak Quercus robur and silver birch Betula pendula. There are also numerous overhanging branches from the fenced off Woodland W2 that is outside Hanson control. None of the scrub and trees in this triangle have any bat roost potential. Of the 2 trees previously identified in this general area as having bat roost potential, T1 was soft felled in 2012 – no bat evidence found), the remaining tree T2 is just outside the area and would not be affected.

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 57 Geoplan Limited

Wilnecote Quarry Town and Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

E 4.2.1 The vegetation to be removed does however have potential for breeding birds to occur and also provides good terrestrial habitat for amphibians. However this area is some 250m from the closest proven great crested newt water body.

E 5.0 Proposed Mitigation

E 5.0.1 The assessment confirms that the potential for impacts on protected wildlife resulting from the proposed development (re-phasing of the benches and creation of a haul road to the south west of the woodland) is limited.

E 5.0.2 Despite this, a few precautionary mitigation options are proposed.

E 5.0.3 Although there is no evidence of badger use in the future operational area or proposed extension, it is recommended that update badger surveys are undertaken prior to development extending into any new area. This includes removal of any existing soil bunds as these can provide favourable conditions for badgers to burrow into. Such survey should be undertaken in March when badgers are at their most active.

E 5.0.4 There should be no requirement to fell any mature trees to facilitate the development. If in future any trees need to be felled, they will be re-surveyed. Any trees having bat roost potential (where there is no actual evidence of use) will be felled in a bat friendly manner as set out below.

• Each potential roost will be treated as if bats are present; • Work will be carried out by a suitably experienced tree surgeon; • The sections containing the potential roosts need to be cut and carefully lowered to the ground;

• Pruning or sectional felling should avoid cuts in proximity of

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 58 Geoplan Limited

Wilnecote Quarry Town and Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

potential roosts;

• Limbs with internal fissures, when felled, should avoid closure of fissures;

• Cross cutting should avoid cavities and hollow sections; • The sections containing potential bat roosts should be left on the ground for a period of at least 24 hours;

• A licensed bat worker should be present during the operation; • Should any bats be found, they should be carefully placed in one of the bat boxes that have already been erected on site.

E 5.0.5 Any removal of potential bird nesting habitat will be undertaken outside the bird nesting period (this should be assumed to be March to August inclusive). If there is any need to remove potential nesting vegetation during this period for health and safety reasons, it must first be checked by an ecologist.

E 5.0.6 Although there is no evidence of protected amphibian and reptile species in the areas affected by this application, any areas of habitat providing potential reptile and amphibians will be carefully cleared, using the following protocol set out below.

E 5.0.7 Within these areas, existing scrub will first be carefully cut down and placed in an area where it will not require to be removed in the future to act as habitat piles. This will need to be done before the end of February to avoid risks to breeding birds. At the same time, an existing pile of dead wood (previously placed as habitat as part of previous site clearance) will also need to be moved. As this could be used by nesting birds this should be moved before the end of February. However, hibernating amphibians could also use it and therefore to accommodate both groups, it would be best if it could be moved from

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 59 Geoplan Limited

Wilnecote Quarry Town and Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

the end of the bird breeding season (giving a period of September to October).

E 5.0.8 Where possible, the material will be moved by hand, supervised by an ecologist, only using machinery where necessary.

E 5.0.9 With respect to ground vegetation, this will be walked over and visually searched, turning over any objects which could hide amphibians. If any amphibians are found they will be moved to the area around Pond P4 (in Area 6). Once the area has been searched, the vegetation will be strimmed to 150mm and then raked off the site, again to form habitat piles. After 3 days the area will be checked again before being stripped.

E 5.0.10 The closest designated site to the proposed application area is Local Wildlife Site 20/20/41 which is described as an open mosaic on previously developed land which is being colonised by species-rich neutral grassland and scrub. The development will not have any direct effect on this site.

E 6.0 Conclusions/Significance of Residual Impacts

E 6.0.1 Given the habitats present on the site, survey work has concentrated on badger, water vole, bats, breeding birds, reptiles and great crested newts. The site was divided into 6 distinct survey areas.

E 6.0.2 The following designated sites are known to occur within 3km of the site boundary:

• 2 SSSI’s, • 2 Local Nature Reserves,

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 60 Geoplan Limited

Wilnecote Quarry Town and Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

• 1 RSPB Reserve, • 2 Biodiversity Alert Sites, • 9 local wildlife sites of which 2 border the quarry and one Hockley (west of) LWS actually borders the application area to the north east.

E 6.0.3 No evidence of water voles was noted on site and only 2 trees (one of which has been removed) were considered to have high value for potential bat roosting. However no bats were seen to emerge or return to these trees during 3 bat survey visits.

E 6.0.4 2 red (Linnet and song thrush) and 4 amber list bird species were identified as probable breeding species on site (none of which were in the proposed application area and were centred mainly on the two Woodlands).

E 6.0.5 Grass snakes was noted during the suite of reptile surveys in Areas 2 and 4. Great crested newts were noted in Pond P4 and Ditches D1 and D4 and smooth newts were present in Ponds P1, P4, P5 and P7 and Ditches D1, D2.

E 6.0.6 Although no evidence of badger was noted the application areas, update badger surveys should be undertaken prior to development extending into any new area.

E 6.0.7 It is unlikely that the proposed development will have any significant effect on any locally designated Wildlife Sites.

E 6.0.8 Subject to clearance works being carried out in accordance in accordance with the protocol set out previously, the assessment

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 61 Geoplan Limited

Wilnecote Quarry Town and Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

concludes that the proposed works should not have any significant effect on local wildlife or protected species.

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 62 Geoplan Limited

Wilnecote Quarry Town And Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

Transport

T 1.0 Introduction

T 1.0.1 Transport was not raised as an issue in pre-submission consultations.

T 2.0 Existing Situation

T 2.1 The majority of Etruria Marl produced at the site is used at the on-site brickworks. Small volumes have also historically been used to supply other facilities. This practice has reduced in recent years with a corresponding reduction in historic vehicle movements.

T 3.0 Proposed Situation

T 3.0.1 Etruria Marl extracted from the site will continue to primarily supply the on-site brickworks with materials being taken from the working benches to the brickworks stockpile via internal site haul roads.

T 3.0.2 Small volumes of Marl will continue to be used to supply other facilities, but these volumes will be significantly below those achieved historically because of the limited reserve life at the site.

T 4.0 Predicted Impacts

T 4.0.1 Proposed amendments to approved quarry development drawings are considered to have no negative transport impacts.

T 4.0.2 The proposed amendments will result in an overall decrease in landfill capacity to that currently approved. Overall traffic associated with landfill operations will therefore be reduced.

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 63 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town And Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

T 4.0.3 The proposed construction of a short section of internal site haul road is considered to have no implications for transport impacts.

T 5.0 Mitigation

T 5.0.1 In view of the above no transport mitigation is considered necessary or warranted.

T 6.0 Conclusions

T 6.0.1 The development proposals will lead to an overall reduction in traffic movements associated with landfill operations at the site.

T 6.0.2 There will be a reduction in historic traffic movements associated with the transfer of Marl to off-site facilities because of the declining reserve position at the site.

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 64 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town & Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

Socio-Economic

SE 1.0 Existing Background

SE 1.0.1 Wilnecote Quarry is an established quarrying operation which is the principle supplier of raw material clays to the on-site brickworks. The quarry and brickworks have a combined workforce of 30.

SE 1.0.2 The brickworks regularly employs local haulage and mobile plant contractors to deliver its products into the local construction market and undertake clay winning campaigns. The site also uses local suppliers and services in its day-to-day operations.

SE 1.0.3 The brickworks has traditionally supplied in excess of 30 million bricks per annum into the construction market. These materials are essential to the development and maintenance of the built environment and the fulfilment of the aims of local statutory development plans.

SE 2.0 Predicted Impacts

SE 2.0.1 The quarry and brickworks make a positive contribution to the local economy through providing employment, payment of rates and utilising local goods and services.

SE 2.0.2 The application proposes relatively minor amendments to approved quarry designs in order to maximise the potential reserve of Etruria Marl that can be extracted from the site, together with the development of a small section of quarry haul road. Technical reports forming part of this ES confirm that these operations can be undertaken without adversely impacting upon the surrounding environment.

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 65 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town & Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

SE 3.0 Mitigation

SE 3.0.1 Mitigation measures proposed as part of the application are considered appropriate and proportionate to the development.

SE 4.0 Conclusions

SE 4.0.1 Overall, the socio-economic implications of the continued working of Wilnecote Quarry are therefore considered to be significant and positive.

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 66 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town and Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Planning Application

Sustainability

SU 1.0 Introduction

SU 1.0.1 In the UK the Government has taken the lead on matters relating to sustainability and in its Mainstreaming Sustainable Development 2011, it set out its vision for sustainable development.

SU 1.0.2 Hanson Building Products and the clay brick industry has long been involved in promoting sustainability through its representative organizations: The Brick Development Association (BDA) and The British Ceramic Confederation (BCC).

SU 1.0.3 Brick plays a major role in the creation and renovation of the built environment. It is fundamental to the provision of housing and shelter. As a significant employer, the industry shapes the personal development and welfare of those who work within it. It also provides support and benefits for the local communities that are its neighbours.

SU 1.0.4 The UK has an urgent need for both new housing and the renovation of existing housing stock to meet the demands of demographic change. Accepted forecasts indicate that around three million homes will need to be built over the next 20 years.

SU 1.0.5 Consumer research shows that brick is the preferred material for house construction. Buildings made of brick have proved to be particularly sustainable because:

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 67 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town and Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Planning Application

• Brick fulfils a variety of roles in building technology, providing physical support, security, protection from sound and fire, weather resistance, as well as an attractive appearance.

• The flexibility of brick makes it a particularly suitable material for building renovation and alteration.

• Established standards, technical specifications and characteristics ensure its reliability in service.

• It is extremely durable. A brick structure, subject to minimal maintenance, will last almost indefinitely. Its longevity is an even greater advantage since its appearance is enhanced with age.

• Any in-service maintenance costs are infrequent and low.

SU 1.0.7 The acceptability of built development and its contribution to social progress, depends to a large degree on aesthetics. Government advice and planning guidance recognises the importance of design and appearance in producing an environment in which to live and work. Brick makes a significant contribution because:

• Its texture and colour, harmonise with our natural surroundings, making it an accepted part of both urban and rural landscapes

• There is a wide variety of product of differing appearance determined by the clays used and production techniques applied

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 68 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town and Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Planning Application

• The extent of the product range permits its use in a wide variety of styles, both by itself and in conjunction with other materials

• Choice of colour, texture and form can preserve continuity within particular locations

• The requirements of planners and architects for materials reflecting local distinctiveness and sense of place can often be met only by brick

SU 1.0.8 Brickworks tend to be located in rural areas and may often be the main source of employment for local communities. The stability of the demand for brick enables such works to offer long term and stable employment. Because of the mutual dependency between works and communities, relations between the two tend to be unusually strong.

SU 1.0.9 Continuing this relationship means seeking new ways to further improve the lives of people employed in the industry. Brick manufacturers have now defined clear targets for enhancing the working environment at all stages of the manufacturing process.

SU 1.0.10 Bricks are made from clay extracted from different areas of the country. The different clays often dictate the colour of the finished brick, giving a clear indication of its origin. Few building materials are so closely related to the environment from which they come.

SU 1.0.11 The volume and rate of extraction is low compared with that for other minerals. Operations are normally restricted to a limited number of weeks per year – so the immediate impact and rate of change is unpronounced.

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 69 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town and Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Planning Application

Extraction is generally only economical where the ratio of usable to unusable material is relatively high.

SU 1.0.12 Brick manufacturers have worked hard to minimise the visual and environmental impact of their work and to restore exhausted extraction sites to beneficial use.

SU 2.0 Prudent Use of Resources

SU 2.0.1 Sustainability is, amongst other things, about the responsible use of resources. The task, therefore, is to use resources as efficiently as possible – to reduce waste, reduce the energy used in manufacture, encourage the re- use of materials and to design products with the longest possible life span.

SU 2.0.2 Very little clay is wasted during manufacture. Unfired waste clay is reused in the manufacturing process and less than perfect fired bricks are crushed and used as aggregates in other parts of the building industry.

SU 2.0.3 The brick industry has worked hard to reduce the energy used in the firing process. This is demonstrated by a substantial investment in more efficient computer controlled kilns that allow recycled heat to be used in the drying process and the undertaking of energy monitoring programmes. In addition, in larger brickworks where exhausted pits have been used for landfill, gas from the landfill may be used to fire the kilns or to generate electricity which is sold back into the National Grid.

SU 2.0.4 Both clay and finished bricks are heavy and bulky, so the energy used in transportation is always a consideration. For this reason, brickworks are

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 70 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town and Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Planning Application

usually sited on or close to the clay source and a large percentage of bricks are used close to their point of manufacture as in the case of Wilnecote.

SU 2.0.5 However, the chief demonstration of the brick industry’s prudent use of resources must be the durability and low maintenance of the finished product. Not only does it have an almost limitless life span, but it is, most unusually, a product that actually improves with age: this means that there is a ready market for recycled brick from demolished buildings.

SU 3.0 Hanson Building Products

SU 3.0.1 Most of the company’s products have sustainable qualities - durability well in excess of 60 years, low or nil maintenance, heat and noise insulation and they can be recycled.

SU 3.0.2 To safeguard valuable mineral reserves, it uses secondary and recycled materials whenever it is economic and technically feasible and it has programmes in place to reduce energy and water consumption and minimise waste.

SU 3.0.3 It provides safe and healthy conditions for its employees and strives to minimise the impact of its operations on the environment and the communities in which it operates.

SU 3.0.4 It has a comprehensive environmental policy in place, underpinned by a commitment to the principles of sustainable development.

SU 4.0 Conclusions

SU 4.0.1 Building materials are essential to a sustainable society.

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 71 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town and Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Planning Application

SU 4.0.2 Hanson Building Products and the clay brick industry has a long established commitment to environmental sustainability and an awareness of the importance of the concept of sustainability encompassing all current and future activity.

SU 4.0.3 There are recognized benefits to sustainability, where clay can be sourced locally from reserves either on, or close to, the site of brickworks.

SU 4.0.4 In recognition of the need for continuing improvement, the industry has developed a Sustainability Strategy for the future and Hanson Building Products is a signatory to this strategy.

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 72 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town & Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

Alternatives

A 1.0 The proposed amendments to the approved quarry development scheme have been designed to maximise the potential recovery of Etruria Marl reserves from areas which are within the boundaries of existing planning permissions at the site.

A 1.0.1 The alternative to the proposals would be a lateral extension to the site into undisturbed ground or the establishment of a completely new quarry elsewhere. Whilst this might be appropriate at some future date, the sustainable option must be to recover as much reserve as possible from an area already subject to quarrying activity.

A 1.0.3 In conclusion, the development proposals put forward in the application have evolved over a period of time and have been influenced by the outcomes of the EIA process. They are considered to represent an appropriate balance between the operational requirements of the quarry operators and the need to protect residential amenity and the environment.

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 74 Geoplan Limited Wilnecote Quarry Town & Country Planning ‘EIA’ Regs 2011 Environmental Statement

Conclusions

C 1.0 Development proposals have been submitted to Staffordshire County Council to enable amendment of approved quarry development drawings and construction of a short section of new haul road.

C 1.0.1 The proposals will maximise the recovery of Etruria Marl reserves from the site while keeping extraction within existing approved planning permission boundaries.

C 1.0.2 The reserves released as a result of the proposed amendments will be predominantly used to supply the on-site brickworks, a significant local employer.

C 1.0.3 This Environmental Statement assesses the potential environmental impacts arising out of the development proposals and demonstrates that, subject to proposed mitigation and the imposition of appropriate planning conditions, the development can proceed without causing significant impact upon people living in the vicinity of the site or the environment.

Hanson Building Products Limited Page 74 Geoplan Limited