DOCSLIB.ORG

Strategic Green Belt Review 2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Strategic Green Belt Review 2012 Lichfield District Strategic Green Belt Review July 2012 Lichfield District Strategic Green Belt Review Context & Principles for the Green Belt Review 1 Introduction & Purpose of the Review 4 2 Scope of the Review 6 3 Green Belt Context & Planning History within Lichfield District 8 4 Principles of the Approach to the Review: Considering the 'general extent' of 10 the Green Belt and the need for change Settlements within the Green Belt 5 Lichfield and Burntwood 17 6 The Larger Green Belt Inset Villages 20 7 Smaller Green Belt Inset Villages 30 8 Other Villages and Hamlets within the Green Belt 43 Employment & Other Land Uses Outside Settlements 9 Developed Sites in the Green Belt 48 The Permanence of Green Belt Boundaries 10 Looking Beyond the Plan Period 53 July 2012 Context & Principles for the Green Belt Review July 2012 3 Lichfield District Strategic Green Belt Review 1 Introduction & Purpose of the Stafford Hospital Retail Review Leisure, Tourism and Culture Employemnt Burton & East ¯ Midlands Airport Hospital Retail 1.1 The establishment and maintenance Employment Leisure, Tourism of Green Belts around many of England’s and Cutlure To Stafford and the North West main urban areas in order to strictly control To Ashbourne and the North development, has long been a part of To Rugeley Armitage with To Burton and national planning policy. In the West Handsacre the North Alrewas Cannock Midlands there is a Green Belt that encircles Hospital, Fradley Retail Leisure, Tourism the main ‘conurbation’ area and encloses and Culture Employment Lichfield Birmingham, Solihull, Walsall, Burntwood Whittington To Cannock and Wolverhampton and the built up areas of the North West oll To Brownhills M 6T and Walsall Sandwell and Dudley. It extends to the east To Tamworth To Tamworth and the South Shenstone of Birmingham extending to Coventry. To Tamworth The Black Tamworth Country M Employment Fazeley 6 Hospitals T Retail, Leisure, o l Although National Planning Guidance has Retail l Tourism and Leisure, Tourism To Sutton Coldfield Culture and Birmingham and Culture To Birmingham identified five specific purposes of Green Employment and the South Little Aston Belts, (see paragraph 4.14), the principal Key Train Stations reason for establishing a Green Belt in the Main Roads Birmingham Canals Airport Watercourses West Midlands was to stop the further Major Rail Station M6 Toll Retail Railway Leisure, Tourism and Culture National Forest outward spread of these main urban areas Employment AONB Education SSSI Hospitals into the open countryside surrounding them. Forest of Mercia Green Belt District Settlement Reproduced from The Ordnance Survey Mapping with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Offices (C) Crown Copyright : License No 100017765 Dated 2011 Urban areas 1.2 Part of the West Midlands Green Belt lies within Lichfield District. It covers much Picture 1.1 of the southern part of the District Council area, extending from the West Midlands 1.3 The development restraint imposed Planning Authorities areas to approximately by Green Belt policy has been a major the line of the West Coast Main Line railway. feature of land use planning within Lichfield Green Belt therefore covers in excess of half District for many years, particularly in of the area of Lichfield District, although the focussing new development on existing main towns and villages are excluded settlements. This Green Belt Review has through the definition of ‘Insets’ within the been prepared to support the Lichfield Green Belt. This means that the built up District Local Plan Strategy 2012. In areas of the settlements are not within the particular its purpose is to ensure that Green Green Belt, but there is a defined Green Belt Belt policy will continue to be applied within boundary for the settlement that is generally Lichfield District in locations that it is tightly drawn against the edge of the existing essential to keep open, taking account of built up area. The general extent of the the Local Plan spatial development strategy. Green Belt within Lichfield District is shown In order to consider this fully however it is in the diagram opposite. necessary to also examine whether there are places that it may not be essential to keep open in the long term through Green Belt policy, i.e. whether the existing extent and boundaries of the Green Belt are appropriate for the plan period (up to 2028) and beyond. 4 July 2012 1.4 The spatial development strategy 1.7 It is intended that Green Belt policy focuses major development mainly on the should direct development to appropriate two main settlements of Lichfield and and sustainable locations. It should not be Burntwood and at Strategic Development used to constrain necessary and sustainable Locations that are located beyond the outer development. The approach followed in this edge of the Green Belt. It is based upon Review is to consider whether there are or evidence of the relative degrees of may be sustainable development needs sustainability of the existing settlements within the plan period that require within the District. This has included a study amendments to existing Green Belt of all rural settlements both within and boundaries and to suggest where these may beyond the Green Belt, in the Rural be. This approach is entirely consistent with Settlements Sustainability Study, which was national planning policy, provided that it published in 2009 with an update in 2011. demonstrates appropriate evidence to Sustainable development is therefore the support any proposed changes to existing central focus of the Local Plan, Green Belt boundaries that would amount to ‘exceptional circumstances’ justifying 1.5 The Local Plan is being prepared at boundary changes. a time when national planning policy is being re-shaped to empower local communities to 1.8 Where the Review concludes that it have a greater say in the future of the is, or may be, appropriate for changes to be settlements in which they live. Parish Plans made to existing Green Belt boundaries, and Neighbourhood Plans developed at a either in relation to villages or employment local scale will have more of a place in the locations, these are identified. This means future of the planning and there is therefore that the principle of making a change to a need to provide for the flexibility within the some existing boundaries and the general Lichfield District Local Plan Strategy to allow locations identified, can be addressed by these to be prepared in the future. The the Local Plan Strategy. However, no Green Belt Review therefore needs to detailed boundary changes are identified by consider what the implications of this might this review or proposed to be included within be for the settlements that lie within the the Local Plan Strategy. The details of general extent of the Green Belt within the boundaries will be the subject of the District. Allocations part of the Local Plan, to be prepared separately, so that any boundary 1.6 Where Green Belt exists, severe changes can be scrutinised at that stage. restriction on the type of development that will be permitted applies, and national policy defines the limited types of development that are appropriate within Green Belts (now contained within the National Planning Policy Framework, published March 2012). The Review considers the implications of such restrictions on existing Green Belt villages and on existing development in open countryside, so as to ensure that the strategy of seeking sustainable development within Lichfield District is supported by, and not hindered by, Green Belt policy. July 2012 5 Lichfield District Strategic Green Belt Review 2 Scope of the Review Key rural settlements 2.1 The Local Plan Strategy Evidence 2.5 The larger villages of Alrewas, Base has already shown that there is no Armitage with Handsacre, Fazeley, Little need within Lichfield District for any major Aston, Shenstone and Whittington, were ‘pulling back’ of existing Green Belt defined as key rural settlements within the boundaries to meet major or strategic RSSS. These settlements were the subject development needs. In particular the of a ‘rural masterplanning’ study during 2010 identified housing requirements for Lichfield and 2011 that involved extensive local District for the period up to 2028, which are community engagement. significant in scale, are proposed to be 2.6 All of the key rural settlements except accommodated either on previously for Alrewas lie within the general extent of developed or greenfield land outside the the Green Belt, although they are ‘Inset’ Green Belt. Overall there is only limited need within it (i.e. their built up areas have been for additional employment land within the excluded from the Green Belt through a District. defined boundary). The Rural 2.2 The context and scope of the Green Masterplanning study resulted in a series of Belt Review is therefore principally to village reports that have already been consider whether there may be any specific published by the District Council as part of requirements to amend existing Green Belt the Evidence Base for the Local Plan. The boundaries to meet more local, rather than reports include recommendations on the ‘strategic’, needs (i.e. those that would have potential for change and growth. The any significant impact upon a District spatial potential implications on existing Green Belt strategy) and therefore at a modest scale. boundaries arising from the Rural It follows that any changes suggested within Masterplanning Village Reports, are this review should not have a significant summarised within this Review. impact upon the overall spatial development ‘Inset’ Smaller villages strategy for the District for the period up to 2028. 2.7 There are several smaller villages lying within the Green Belt that are also 2.3 A particular focus of the Green Belt ‘Inset’ within the Green Belt.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Talbot Street/Lichfield Street, Rugeley CA Appraisal 2019
    Talbot Street/Lichfield Street, Rugeley Conservation Area Appraisal 2019 Search for ‘Cannock Chase Life’ @CannockChaseDC www.cannockchasedc.gov.uk Conservation Area Appraisal Talbot Street/Lichfield Street, Rugeley 1. Introduction A Conservation Area is “an area of special architectural or historic interest, the character or appearance of which it is desirable to preserve or enhance”. The Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 places a duty on the local authority to designate Conservation Areas where appropriate. It also requires the local authority to formulate and publish proposals for the preservation or enhancement of these areas. An Appraisal was first produced for Talbot Street/Lichfield Street Conservation Area in 2005 and this document updates its predecessor making use of much of the information contained therein. The updates comprise some rearrangement of layout to accord with the house style developed subsequently, updates to the planning policy context following national and local policy changes, and references reflecting recent development and changes of use in the Conservation Area. This Appraisal seeks to provide a clear definition of the special architectural or historic interest that warranted designation of Talbot Street/Lichfield Street as a Conservation Area through a written appraisal of its character and appearance – what matters and why. The Appraisal is intended as a guide upon which to base the form and style of future development in the area. It is supported by adopted policy in Cannock Chase Local Plan (Part 1) 2014 CP15 seeking to protect and enhance the historic environment, policies CP12 and CP14 aiming to conserve biodiversity and landscape character and Policy CP3 seeking high standards of design.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Bonehill Mews Lichfield Street Fazeley Tamworth B78 3Qn
    G.25533 TO LET A SELF CONTAINED OFFICE BUILDING WITH ADJACENT PARKING 4 BONEHILL MEWS LICHFIELD STREET FAZELEY TAMWORTH B78 3QN 2,796 SQ.FT. (260 SQ.M.) NET WITH DOUBLE GLAZING, HEATING AND CATEGORY II LIGHTING AIR CONDITIONING TO PART PRIVATE KITCHEN AND WC/WASH FACILITIES WELL SITUATED WITHIN APPROXIMATELY 3MILES OF M42 J10 AND 5 MILES OF M6 TOLL JT3 LOCATION Bonehill Mews is a modern development of four self contained buildings and is well situated off Lichfield Street, Fazeley within approximately 1.75 miles of the A5 trunk road, 3 miles of the M42 motorway Junction 10 and 5 miles from the M6 Toll Junction T3. DESCRIPTION A self contained two storey building providing modern open plan office accommodation completed with fitted carpets, electric heating, double glazing to external windows, category II lighting and air conditioning to part of the first floor as follows: GROUND FLOOR Entrance Lobby With male, female and disabled wc/wash facilities off. Open Plan Office 1,622 sq.ft. net Area (150.68 sq.m.) FIRST FLOOR Kitchen 76 sq.ft. With vinyl sheet floor covering, stainless steel sink unit (7.12 sq.m.) and fitted work top. Open Plan Office 1,098 sq.ft. net Area (102.02 sq.m.) Total Net Internal 2,796 sq.ft. Floor Area (260 sq.m.) TO THE EXTERIOR The property has the benefit of eleven private car parking spaces within the adjacent forecourt area. TENURE The property is available “TO LET” by way of a new full repairing and insuring Lease for a term of years by agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • Rural Settlement Sustainability Study 2008
    Rural Settlement Sustainability Study 2008 June 2008 Rural Settlement Sustainability Study 2008 Contents 1 Aims of the Study 3 2 Background to Rural Sustainability 5 3 Definition of Rural Settlements 9 4 Definition of Rural Services 11 5 Delivery of Rural Services 13 6 Inter-Relationship Between Rural Settlements & Urban Areas 15 7 Primary Services, Facilities & Jobs 17 8 Key Local Services & Facilities 19 9 Rural Accessibility 25 10 Sustainable Rural Settlement Summary 29 Appendices 1 Rural Settlements: Population & Dwellings i 2 Rural Transport: Car Ownership by Settlement iii 3 Sustainability Matrix: Access, Services & Facilities v June 2008 1 Aims of the Study 1.1 This report has been prepared to assist in the development of policies for sustainable development within Lichfield District. Information provided within the document will inform the preparation of a Core Strategy for the District as part of the Local Development Framework, in particular in the consideration of potential development locations within the District and an overall spatial strategy for longer term development having regard to principles of sustainability. 1.2 In his report on the Public Examination into the District Council’s first submitted Core Strategy (withdrawn 2006), the Inspector concluded that although there were proposed housing allocations within some of the District’s rural settlements, there was a lack of evidence in relation to the suitability of villages in the District to accommodate growth. He considered that the relative sustainability of different settlements should have been assessed as part of the preparation of the Core Strategy. He indicated that an assessment of the sustainability of rural settlements would ensure that the scale and location of development outside the District’s two main towns was driven by overall sustainability considerations, rather than simply the availability of previously developed land.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Drayton Bassett Conservation Area Draft Appraisal February 2018
    Drayton Bassett Conservation Area Appraisal and Management Plan Draft February 2018 Drayton Bassett Conservation Area ADOPTION STATEMENT SECTION 1 – CONSERVATION AREA APPRAISAL 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Planning Policy Context 1.3 Summary of Significance 1.4 Location and Setting 1.5 Historic Development 1.6 Architectural Quality and Built Form 1.7 Open Space, Parks and Gardens and Trees 1.8 Assessment of Condition 1.9 Protection Offered by Designation 1.10 Maps SECTION 2 – CONSERVATION AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Planning Policies and Guidance 2.3 Regeneration and Enhancement 2.4 Street and Traffic Management 2.5 Trees, Open Space and Green Infrastructure Strategies 2.6 Enforcement and Remediation Strategy SECTION 3 – REFERENCE, APPENDICES AND CONTACT DETAILS Appendix A – Article 4 Directions Appendix B – The Local List References Contact Details 2 ADOPTION STATEMENT Cabinet approval for consultation – 5th December 2017 Public Consultation – 5th March to 15th April 2018 Public Meeting – 20th March 2018 at a meeting of the Parish Council Final document approved Publication complete Final designation date 3 SECTION 1 – CONSERVATION AREA APPRAISAL 1.1 Introduction Subject to public consultation and further approval by the Council the Drayton Bassett Conservation Area is proposed to be designated in 2018 and covers an area of 2.3 hectares. The boundary will follow the route established in the current Conservation Area document. This is a logical route which encompasses the historic core of the settlement, and includes all existing buildings which were recorded on the 1882 first edition Ordnance Survey mapping, and excludes later development. The purpose of this document is to provide an understanding of the special architectural and historical character of the area which will form the basis for development control decisions and for developing proposals and initiatives for the area in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Fazeley Town Council
    Fazeley Town Council Minutes of the Meeting of the Town Council held in the Main Hall, Fazeley Town Hall on Monday, 9th December 2019 at 7.30pm Councillors Present: B Hoult, N Claymore, J Dann, S Bree, M Hoult, J Atkins and A Farrell Also Present: PCSO Margaret Griffiths R Young, Clerk to the Council Apologies: D Dwyer, O Shepherd, J Sadler and B Gwilt Prior to the start of the meeting, PCSO Margaret Griffiths discussed Policing Issues with Councillors and the Town Mayor, B Hoult, distributed grants to local organisations. 109) Declarations of Interest No declarations were made. 110) Minutes It was proposed (A Farrell), seconded (S Bree) and agreed that the Minutes (93-103) of the Town Council Meeting held on the 11th November 2019 be approved as a true and correct record. Resolved: That the Minutes (93-103) of the Ordinary Meeting of the Town Council held on the 11th November 2019 be approved as a true and correct record. 111) Actions Brought Topic Description Updated Planned Councillor to Action Date Resolution Sponsor Council Date 2018 Neighbourhood Working group to produce Meeting with 2022 JS Plan N.P. Kershaws 2019 Additional Confirmed N.B. size of Ongoing Feb 2020 Noticeboard 105cm x 105cm to Sandhu Stores. 2019 Website O Shepherd to update. Ongoing 2020 OS/AF Minutes - 09.12.19 Page 1 Brought Topic Description Updated Planned Councillor to Action Date Resolution Sponsor Council Date 2019 Town Hall Completion of painting Ongoing – 2020 --- Painting Spring 2020. Front door needs attention. 2019 Land opposite Ongoing with SCC Legal Property 2020 JA/JS Evans Croft ownership problem.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission to the Local Boundary Commission for England Further Electoral Review of Staffordshire Stage 1 Consultation
    Submission to the Local Boundary Commission for England Further Electoral Review of Staffordshire Stage 1 Consultation Proposals for a new pattern of divisions Produced by Peter McKenzie, Richard Cressey and Mark Sproston Contents 1 Introduction ...............................................................................................................1 2 Approach to Developing Proposals.........................................................................1 3 Summary of Proposals .............................................................................................2 4 Cannock Chase District Council Area .....................................................................4 5 East Staffordshire Borough Council area ...............................................................9 6 Lichfield District Council Area ...............................................................................14 7 Newcastle-under-Lyme Borough Council Area ....................................................18 8 South Staffordshire District Council Area.............................................................25 9 Stafford Borough Council Area..............................................................................31 10 Staffordshire Moorlands District Council Area.....................................................38 11 Tamworth Borough Council Area...........................................................................41 12 Conclusions.............................................................................................................45
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Water Management Plan Phase 1
    Southern Staffordshire Surface Water Management Plan Phase 1 Stafford Borough, Lichfield District, Tamworth Borough, South Staffordshire District and Cannock Chase District Councils July 2010 Final Report 9V5955 CONTENTS Page 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 General Overview 1 1.2 Objectives of the SWMP 1 1.3 Scope of the SWMP 3 1.3.1 Phase 1 - Preparation 5 1.3.2 Phase 2 - Risk Assessment 5 2 ESTABLISHING A PARTNERSHIP 7 2.1 Identification of Partners 7 2.2 Roles and Responsibilities 9 2.3 Engagement Plan 10 2.4 Objectives 10 3 COLLATE AND MAP INFORMATION 11 3.1 Data Collection and Quality 11 3.1.1 Historic Flood Event Data 12 3.1.2 Future Flood Risk Data 15 3.2 Mapping and GIS 18 3.2.1 Surface Water Flooding 18 3.2.2 Flood Risk Assets 19 3.2.3 SUDS Map 19 3.2.4 Summary Sheets 20 4 STAFFORD BOROUGH 23 4.1 Surface Water Flood Risk 23 4.2 Surface Water Management 24 4.3 Recommendations 25 5 LICHFIELD DISTRICT 27 5.1 Surface Water Flood Risk 27 5.2 Surface Water Management 28 5.2.1 Canal Restoration 29 5.3 Recommendations 31 6 TAMWORTH BOROUGH 33 6.1 Surface Water Flood Risk 33 6.2 Surface Water Management 34 6.3 Recommendations 35 7 SOUTH STAFFORDSHIRE DISTRICT 37 7.1 Surface Water Flood Risk 37 7.2 Surface Water Management 38 7.2.1 Canal Restoration 39 7.3 Recommendations 41 Southern Staffordshire SWMP Phase 1 9V5955/R00003/303671/Soli Final Report -i- July 2010 8 CANNOCK CHASE DISTRICT 43 8.1 Surface Water Flood Risk 43 8.2 Surface Water Management 44 8.2.1 Canal Restoration 45 8.3 Recommendations 47 9 SELECTION OF AN APPROACH FOR FURTHER ANALYSIS
    [Show full text]
  • To Access Forms and Drawings Associated with the Applications Below, Please Use the Following Link
    Printed On 17/10/2016 Weekly List ESBC www.eaststaffsbc.gov.uk Sal Khan CPFA, MSc Head of Service LIST No: 42/2016 PLANNING APPLICATIONS REGISTERED DURING THE PERIOD 10/10/2016 TO 14/10/2016 To access forms and drawings associated with the applications below, please use the following link :- http://www.eaststaffsbc.gov.uk/Northgate/PlanningExplorer/ApplicationSearch.aspx and enter the full reference number. Alternatively you are able to view the applications at:- Customer Services Centre, Market Place, Burton upon Trent or the Customer Services Centre, Uttoxeter Library, Red Gables, High Street, Uttoxeter. REFERENCE Grid Ref: 424,802.00 : 322,266.00 P/2016/01214 Parish(s): Burton Detailed Planning Application Ward(s): Burton Retention of an ATM housed in a secure room St Peters Self Serve Garage For Ms Jan Clark St Peters Bridge c/o Mrs Sophie Wilbond Burton upon Trent Notemachine UK Ltd Staffordshire Russell House DE14 2TZ Elvicta Business Park Crickhowell NP8 1DF REFERENCE Grid Ref: 424,439.00 : 322,613.00 P/2016/01414 Parish(s): Burton Reserved Matters Ward(s): Burton Reserved Matters application for the erection of a detached building to provide 8 residential units including details of appearance, landscaping, layout and scale land to rear of 26 and 29 Uxbridge Street For Mr Tim Haywood Burton upon Trent c/o JMI Planning DE14 3JR 62 Carter Street UTTOXETER ST14 8EU REFERENCE Grid Ref: 424,169.00 : 322,926.00 P/2016/01455 Parish(s): Burton Planning Condition (Minor Material Amendment Ward(s): Burton Application under Section 73 of
    [Show full text]
  • The Cannock Chase Geotrail
    CCGCOVER10.3.09.indd 1 CCGCOVER10.3.09.indd 10/3/09 17:53:43 10/3/09 Not to scale to Not Unconformity Fault Fault Hopwood Hopwood Fault Tixall Tixall Boundary Boundary Basin Basin Cannock Chase Cannock Cover Photograph: Source of the Sher Brook Sher the of Source Photograph: Cover 370080 01782 Tel: Services Print MC by Printed Eastern Eastern Needwood Needwood Stafford warnings EAST WEST consider other people. Please adhere to all Forestry Commission instructions and and instructions Commission Forestry all to adhere Please people. other consider protect plants and animals and take your litter home. Keep dogs under control and and control under dogs Keep home. litter your take and animals and plants protect Not to scale to Not safe, plan ahead and follow any signs; leave gates and property as you find them; them; find you as property and gates leave signs; any follow and ahead plan safe, Remember to follow the country code and please do not hammer rock surfaces. Be Be surfaces. rock hammer not do please and code country the follow to Remember www.staffs-wildlife.org.uk Staffordshire Wildlife Trust – – Trust Wildlife Staffordshire www.esci.keele.ac.uk/nsgga North Staffordshire Group Geologists’ Association – – Association Geologists’ Group Staffordshire North Unconformity Valley www.staffs-rigs.org.uk Staffordshire RIGS – RIGS Staffordshire Trent Little Haywood Little phological sites in Staffordshire. For more information contact: information more For Staffordshire. in sites phological Old Park Old Cannock Chase Cannock Beaudesert Beaudesert
    [Show full text]
  • Drayton Bassett Conservation Area Appraisal and Management Plan
    Drayton Bassett Conservation Area Appraisal and Management Plan December 2018 Drayton Bassett Conservation Area ADOPTION STATEMENT SECTION 1 – CONSERVATION AREA APPRAISAL 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Planning Policy Context 1.3 Summary of Significance 1.4 Location and Setting 1.5 Historic Development 1.6 Architectural Quality and Built Form 1.7 Open Space, Parks and Gardens and Trees 1.8 Assessment of Condition 1.9 Protection Offered by Designation 1.10 Maps SECTION 2 – CONSERVATION AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Planning Policies and Guidance 2.3 Regeneration and Enhancement 2.4 Street and Traffic Management 2.5 Trees, Open Space and Green Infrastructure Strategies 2.6 Enforcement and Remediation Strategy SECTION 3 – REFERENCE, APPENDICES AND CONTACT DETAILS Appendix A – Article 4 Directions Appendix B – The Local List References Contact Details 2 ADOPTION STATEMENT Cabinet approval for consultation – 5th December 2017 Public Consultation – 5th March to 4th June 2018 Public Meeting – 20th March 2018 at a meeting of the Parish Council O&S Meeting – 12th November 2018 Cabinet Meeting – 4th December 2018 Council approval and final designation date – 18th December 2018 Statutory notices published – February 2019 3 SECTION 1 – CONSERVATION AREA APPRAISAL 1.1 Introduction The Drayton Bassett Conservation Area was designated in 2018 and covers an area of 3.1 hectares. The boundary follows the route shown in section 1.10. This is considered to be a logical route which encompasses the historic core of the settlement, and includes all existing buildings which were recorded on the 1882 first edition Ordnance Survey mapping, and also the early C20th School and which excludes most of the later development.
    [Show full text]
  • Coventry and Warwickshire Joint Green Belt Study: Stage 2 Final
    Coventry & Warwickshire Joint Green Belt Study Coventry City Council, North Warwickshire Borough Council, Nuneaton and Bedworth Borough Council, Rugby Borough Council, Stratford-on-Avon District Council and Warwick District Council Stage 2 Final Report for North Warwickshire Borough Council and Stratford-on-Avon District Council Prepared by LUC April 2016 Project Title: Joint Green Belt Study Client: Coventry City Council, North Warwickshire Borough Council, Nuneaton and Bedworth Borough Council, Rugby Borough Council, Stratford-on-Avon District Council and Warwick District Council Version Date Version Details Prepared by Checked by Approved by 1.0 23rd March Draft Josh Allen Philip Smith Philip Smith 2016 2.0 13th April Final Draft Report Josh Allen Philip Smith Philip Smith 2016 3.0 18th April Final Report Josh Allen Philip Smith Philip Smith 2016 Last saved: 18/04/2016 16:46 Coventry & Warwickshire Joint Green Belt Study Coventry City Council, North Warwickshire Borough Council, Nuneaton and Bedworth Borough Council, Rugby Borough Council, Stratford-on- Avon District Council and Warwick District Council Stage 2 Final Report for North Warwickshire Borough Council and Stratford-on-Avon District Council Prepared by LUC April 2016 Planning & EIA LUC LONDON Offices also in: Land Use Consultants Ltd Registered in England Design 43 Chalton Street Bristol Registered number: 2549296 Landscape Planning London Glasgow Registered Office: Landscape Management NW1 1JD Edinburgh 43 Chalton Street Ecology T +44 (0)20 7383 5784 London NW1 1JD Mapping
    [Show full text]
  • Manor House, Uttoxeter Road, Kingstone, Staffordshire , St14 8Qh Asking Price of £525,000
    MANOR HOUSE, UTTOXETER ROAD, KINGSTONE, STAFFORDSHIRE , ST14 8QH ASKING PRICE OF £525,000 www.abodemidlands.co.uk SUMMARY ** BESPOKE FAMILY PROPERTY ** VILLAGE LOCATION ** BACKING ONTO OPEN FIELDS AND FAR REACHING VIEWS ** Situated in the heart of the popular village location of Kingstone stands this detached family home, set over three floors. Being fully uPVC double glazed throughout and gas centrally heated, the spacious property must be internally viewed to be fully appreciated. A brief description of the property comprises reception hallway, dining room, living room, breakfast kitchen, utility room, cloaks/WC. To the first floor are four large bedrooms and separate four-piece family bathroom. The master bedroom benefits from having floor-to-ceiling height windows, boasting panoramic views over open fields and agricultural aspects. Off the master is a dressing room with fitted wardrobes and shower room en-suite facilities. The second floor leads to two further double sized bedrooms. The property benefits from having a full alarm and CCTV system. Viewings on this property are strictly by appointment only and can be arranged by contacting ABODE AREA Manor Hose is situated within the popular village of Kingstone, located 3.6 miles of the market town of Uttoxeter. The town of Uttoxeter offers a range of supermarkets, shops, leisure and dining facilities as well as a cinema, bowling alley, ice rink and the popular Uttoxeter race course. Golf is available at both the Manor Golf Club in Kingstone and at Uttoxeter Golf Club. Kingstone is well placed for access to the regional road network with the A50 being within easy reach (at Uttoxeter) and providing a link to the M42, M1 and M6.
    [Show full text]