Youth Victimisation Was Experienced by Young Men Aged 16 to Numerous and Prolonged Instances Mawby's (1979) Study of 11 to 15 to 24

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Youth Victimisation Was Experienced by Young Men Aged 16 to Numerous and Prolonged Instances Mawby's (1979) Study of 11 to 15 to 24 levels of victimization were again than 10 per cent of the 600 homicides found to be common with 82 per cent in Britain each year are perpetrated Youth of a sample of 208 12 to 14 year olds by parents against their own children recalling they had been victimized in (under age 16). Victimisation the previous year. 68 per cent of The extent of domestic child young women had been sexually abuse remains largely unknown harassed, whilst two thirds of young although research by NCH Action for John Muncie examines the men had suffered from assault and Children in 1994 based on reported theft. In contrast on average only a incidents alone estimated that at least degree of over-control and quarter of the sample admitted that 750,000 children were growing up in they themselves had committed an an atmosphere of fear and violence. lack of protection afforded to offence, leading the authors to In the child sexual abuse young people on the streets, conclude that young people are investigations of the 1980s in 'more sinned against than sinning'. Cleveland, Orkney and Rochdale in the home and in Specific questions about youth blame was passed from parents to victimization were not included in social workers for unnecessarily institutions. the British Crime Survey until 1992. removing children from their he vast majority of research From a sample of 1,350, in just six families. Notions of family sanctity on youth and crime in the UK months a third of 12 to 15 year olds and privacy have always precluded has focussed on young people claimed that they had been assaulted widespread use of criminal T at least once, a fifth had had property prosecutions. A psychological, as offenders rather than as victims of crime. Indeed, if victimology in stolen, a fifth had been harassed by medical or welfare focus obscures general can be said to be in its people their own age and a fifth had the fact that criminal offences have infancy then a specific youth been harassed by an adult. Again it been committed. Further victimology is virtually non-existent. was notable that the risks of theft and ambivalence is created by a This article outlines some of the assault were substantially higher than prevailing political concern that the evidence regarding the victimisation, for the adult population, but that few publicising of child abuse and the degree of over-control and lack incidents were reported to the police children's rights is likely to not only of protection afforded to young (Aye Maung, 1995). The 1998 undermine respect for authority and people on the streets, in the home and British Crime Survey (Mirrlees- self-discipline but also threaten in institutions. Black et al 1998) confirmed that the family life itself. In addition, Morgan risks of burglary or vehicle theft are and Zedner (1992) draw attention to greatest for those where the head of the fact that young people not only Victims of crime household is under 25, while the suffer from physical and sexual One of the first attempts to focus greatest risk of violence is abuse and bullying but are witness directly on youth victimisation was experienced by young men aged 16 to numerous and prolonged instances Mawby's (1979) study of 11 to 15 to 24. of parental violence in the home. year olds in two Sheffield schools. Openly racist harassment and He found that 40 per cent had had bullying is also reported to be Victims of institutional something stolen from their person endured by many black and ethnic and that 25 per cent had suffered a minority children on a daily basis. violence physical assault. Overall 67 per cent Racially motivated violence (as Just as alarming are the growing said that they have been crime reported to the police) increased by number of revelations about the victims. Nevertheless it was not until 250 percent between 1989 and 1996, extensive abuse of children who have the 1990s that the issue was given which means the UK has one of the been in the care of local authorities. much sustained attention. Anderson highest levels of such incidents in Over the past decade there have been et al's. (1990) pioneering work in Western Europe. between 7000 and 11000 young Edinburgh established that criminal people in residential care at any one acts are committed against young time in England, Scotland and Wales. people with "alarming frequency". Victims of family Their treatment has long been a cause They found that over a period of nine violence for concern with allegations of months half of their sample had been Significantly the British Crime systematic violence by residential victims of assault, threatening Survey did not ask about experience staff surfacing throughout the 1980s behaviour or theft (Anderson et al., of youth victimisation and violence and 1990s. Significantly such 1990, p.39). Moreover some 52 per in the home. This is perhaps not victimisation, even when proved, has cent of young women and 36 per cent surprising. Within criminology little tended again to be clouded in terms of young men recalled that they had has been done to expose the routine of 'abuse' and 'mistreatment' rather suffered from adult harassment, of violence - from spanking and than criminal violence. Any resultant ranging from being 'stared at', to slapping to serious assault - endured inquiries have either been hidden importuning and indecent exposure. by young people in their own homes. from public view or at best restricted Whilst for males such offences Nevertheless, what we do know is to identifying a small number of decreased as they grew older, for that children under one year are more individuals who have taken females they increased to the extent at risk of being murdered than any advantage of the powerless. The that 30 per cent of 14 to 15 year olds other age group, with 44 deaths per main policy response has been to had experienced 'touching' or million of population compared with tighten checks on applicants for 'flashing' (Anderson et al., 1990, a national average of 12 per million. residential posts, rather than to p.59). In a follow up study in The majority are killed by their overhaul residential care policies. Glasgow (Hartless et al., 1995), high parents or carers. In addition more However the issue came to a head 20 CJITI no. 41 Autumn 2000 in 2000 with the publication of Lost priority target. The 1998 Crime and unknown to previous generations. in Care - the Waterhouse report Disorder Act introduced new Anti- The old and predictable structures of which uncovered widespread and Social Behaviour Orders to be labour markets and welfare systems organised abuse of boys and girls in applied in response to nuisances and are being dismantled and replaced by North Wales between 1974and 1990. incivilities. To date they have been a series of uncertainties and Waterhouse heard 259 complaints, applied almost exclusively to young contingencies. named 200 workers in more than 40 people. The 1998 Act also introduced homes and found evidence not only curfew restrictions to children under Conclusion of daily physical assault but also of the age of 10 on the presumption, The relative powerlessness of young gross sexual exploitation and rather than actual committal, of people has always placed them at emotional abuse. It also attributed at crime. As a result all manner of potential risk of adult victimisation. least 12 deaths, by suicide or in myths and stereotypes about Such a risk is exacerbated at times suspicious circumstances, to the 'troublesome' people and places when the potential of youth is experience of being 'in care'. have come into play. subjugated to that of'threat'. Seeking Conditions in young offender Coupled with these legal and their greater regulation ensures that institutions have also been a discretionary powers there has been they are placed in positions of greater recurring cause for concern. Between a significant contraction of spaces dependency often in those same 1972 and 1987, 31 prisoners under deemed to be 'public'. Malls and family and institutional settings that the age of 21 committed suicide, but shopping centres have increasingly are a key source of their there were 11 such deaths in the first become semi-privatised, employing victimisation. The problems facing 8 months of 1994 alone. In 1994-5 security guards to deter young people are compounded when nearly a half of young inmates 'undesirables' and those who do not the prevailing political discourse reported that they had been attacked conform to images of the ideal becomes that of 'blaming the victim'. or threatened in the previous month consumer. Lacking consumer power, In such contexts the true nature and (The Guardian, 3 October 1996). the presence of young people is extent of youth victimisation will These publicised cases are viewed as a threat to the normal continue to remain stubbornly hidden arguably the tip of an iceberg of course of commerce. from public view. _ institutional violence, matched by Throughout all such attempts to adult complicity and indifference. regulate youth behaviour the role of John Muncie is Senior Lecturer in They serve as a reminder of the the police is pivotal. Through routine Criminology and Social Policy at the dangers inherent in institutionalising surveillance, targeting and reporting Open University. and incarcerating young people practices the 'usual suspects' are whether in the name of care, of identified. But such 'knowledge' is References rehabilitation or of punitive training. then passed on to other institutions, Anderson, S., Kinsey, R., Loader, I. such as schools and social services, and Smith, C. (1994) Cautionary Policing and routine to 'calibrate the degrees to which the Tales: Young People, Crime and chosen few should be excluded from surveillance Policing in Edinburgh, Aldershot: social life' Avebury Histories of police-youth relations Aye Maung, N.
Recommended publications
  • A Comparative Analysis of Hate Crime Legislation
    A Comparative Analysis of Hate Crime Legislation A Report to the Hate Crime Legislation Review James Chalmers and Fiona Leverick University of Glasgow, July 2017 i A Comparative Analysis of Hate Crime Legislation: A Report to the Hate Crime Legislation Review July 2017 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ________________________________________________ 1 1. WHAT IS HATE CRIME? ________________________________________ 4 2. HATE CRIME LEGISLATION IN SCOTLAND __________________________ 7 3. JUSTIFICATIONS FOR PUNISHING HATE CRIME MORE SEVERELY ______ 23 4. MODELS OF HATE CRIME LEGISLATION __________________________ 40 5. CHOICE OF PROTECTED CHARACTERISTICS _______________________ 52 6. HATE SPEECH AND STIRRING UP OFFENCES _______________________ 68 7. HATE CRIME LEGISLATION IN SELECTED JURISDICTIONS _____________ 89 8. APPROACHES TAKEN IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS RELEVANT TO THE OFFENSIVE BEHAVIOUR AT FOOTBALL AND THREATENING COMMUNICATIONS (SCOTLAND) ACT 2012 ____________________________________________________ 134 ii INTRODUCTION In January 2017, the Scottish Government announced a review of hate crime legislation, chaired by Lord Bracadale.1 Lord Bracadale requested that, to assist the Review it its task, we produce a comparative report detailing principles underpinning hate crime legislation and approaches taken to hate crime in a range of jurisdictions. Work on this report commenced in late March 2017 and the final report was submitted to the Review in July 2017. Chapter 1 (What is Hate Crime?) explores what is meant by the term “hate crime”, noting that different definitions may properly be used for different purposes. It notes that the legislative response to hate crime can be characterised by the definition offered by Chakraborti and Garland: the creation of offences, or sentencing provisions, “which adhere to the principle that crimes motivated by hatred or prejudice towards particular features of the victim’s identity should be treated differently from ‘ordinary’ crimes”.
    [Show full text]
  • Harassment and Victimisation Introduction
    Harassment and victimisation Introduction Stockholm University is to be characterised by its excellent environment for work and study. All employees and students shall be treated equally and with respect. At Stockholm University we shall jointly safeguard our work and study environment. A good environment enables creative development and excellent outcomes for work and study. At Stockholm University, victimisation, harassment associated with discrimination on any grounds and sexual harassment are unacceptable and must not take place. Victimisation, harassment and sexual harassment all jeopardise the affected person's job satisfaction and chances of success in work or study. As soon as the university becomes aware that someone has been affected, action will be taken immediately. In this brochure, Stockholm University explains • the forms that victimisation, harassment and sexual harassment may take, • what you can do if you or someone else becomes subjected to such behaviour, • the university's responsibilities, • the sanctions faced by those subjecting a person to victimisation, harassment or sexual harassment. Astrid Söderbergh Widding Vice-Chancellor Production: Human Resources Office, Student Services, Council for Equal Opportunities and Equality, and Matador kommunikation. Illustrations: Jan Ed. Printing: Ark-Tryckaren, 2015. 3 What is victimisation? All organisations experience occasional differences of opinion, conflicts and difficulties in working together. However, these occasional conflicts are not considered victimisation or bullying. Victimisation is defined as recurrent reprehensible or negative actions directed against individuals and that may lead to the person experiencing it being marginalised. Examples include deliberate insults, demeaning treatment, ostracism, withholding of information, persecution or threats. Victimisation brings with it the risk that individuals as well as entire groups will be adversely affected, in both the short and long terms.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Into Cyberbullying and Cyber Victimisation
    Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 2007, 23(4), 435-454 Bullying in the new playground: Research into cyberbullying and cyber victimisation Qing Li University of Calgary This study examines the nature and extent of adolescents’ cyberbullying experiences, and explores the extent to which various factors, including bullying, culture, and gender, contribute to cyberbullying and cyber victimisation in junior high schools. In this study, one in three adolescents was a cyber victim, one in five was a cyberbully, and over half of the students had either experienced or heard about cyberbullying incidents. Close to half of the cyber victims had no idea who the predators were. Culture and engagement in traditional bullying were strong predictors not only for cyberbullying, but also for cyber victimisation. Gender also played a significant role, as males, compared to their female counterparts, were more likely to be cyberbullies. Cyberbullying and cyber victimisation School bullying has been widely recognised as a serious problem and it is particularly persistent and acute during junior high and middle school periods (National Center for Educational-Statistics, 1995). In the USA, “up to 15% of students … are frequently or severely harassed by their peers. … Only a slim majority of 4th through 12th graders … (55.2%) reported neither having been picked on nor picking on others” (Hoover & Olsen, 2001). Universally, bullying is reported as a significant problem in many countries of the world including European countries, North America, and Japan (Smith et al., 1999), suggesting that bullying may play a important role in adolescents’ life in many societies. More importantly, it is reported that in many cases of school shootings, the bully played a major role (Dedman, 2001; Markward, Cline & Markward, 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • Victimisation from Physical Punishment and Intimate Partner Aggression in South Africa: the Role of Revictimisation
    Victimisation from Physical Punishment and Intimate Partner Aggression in South Africa: The Role of Revictimisation Master’s Thesis in Peace, Mediation and Conflict Research Developmental Psychology Magret Tsoahae, 1901696 Supervisor: Karin Österman Faculty of Education and Welfare Studies Åbo Akademi University, Finland Spring 2021 Magret Tsoahae Abstract Aim: The aim of the study was to investigate victimisation from physical punishment during childhood, victimisation from an intimate partner as an adult, and psychological concomitants. Method: A questionnaire was completed by 190 females, 32 males, and three who did not state their sex. The respondents where from South Africa. The mean age was 40.0 years (SD 12.2) for females, and 29.7 years (SD 9.9) for males. Results: For females, victimisation from physical punishment correlated significantly with victimisation from intimate partner controlling behaviours. For females, but not for males, victimisation from physical punishment during childhood correlated positively with depression and anxiety later in life. For both females and males, a high significant correlation was found between victimisation from intimate partner physical aggression and controlling behaviours, intimate partner physical aggression also correlated significantly with depression and anxiety. For males, victimisation from controlling behaviours correlated significantly with anxiety. Respondents who had been victimised more than average from physical punishment scored significantly higher than others on victimisation from controlling behaviours, intimate partner physical aggression, depression, and anxiety. Conclusions: It was concluded that victimisation from intimate partner aggression was associated with previous victimisation from physical punishment during childhood and could therefore constitute a form of revictimisation. Key Words: Controlling behaviours by a partner, physical intimate partner aggression, physical punishment during childhood, depression, anxiety, South Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Hate Speech
    Measuring trends in online hate speech victimisation Summary of findings and exposure, and attitudes • Overall, 15% of New Zealand adults reported having been personally targeted in New Zealand with online hate speech in the last 12 months. Prepared by Dr. Edgar Pacheco & Neil Melhuish • Compared to our 2018 survey, this result is What is this about? higher by 4 percentage points. On 15 March 2019 a devastating terrorist attack • Over one third of personal experiences of against the Al-Noor Mosque and the Linwood online hate speech occurred after the Christchurch attacks. Islamic Centre in Christchurch killed 51 people and injured 49, some seriously. In addition to • Half of Muslim respondents said they were the tragic loss of life, the attack generated one personally targeted with online hate in the last 12 months. Prevalence was also more of the most significant online safety challenges common among Hindus. New Zealand has experienced. In the immediate aftermath a text reportedly written by • Similar to 2018, people with disabilities and the attacker that included racist and identifiying as non-heterosexuals were also targeted at higher rates. discriminatory language and a livestream video of the attack went viral and continued to • About 3 in 10 adult New Zealanders say reverberate across the internet. they have seen or encountered online hate speech content that targeted someone About 46 minutes after the attack began, else. Netsafe received its first call from the public • Nearly 7 in 10 New Zealand adults think about this content being accessible online. It that online hate speech is spreading. went onto receive just under 600 enquiries and • Over 8 in 10 adults believe that social complaints in the days following.
    [Show full text]
  • Teachers' Perceptions of Homophobic Victimisation Among Learners Within Independent Secondary Schools
    Teachers’ Perceptions of Homophobic Victimisation among Learners within Independent Secondary Schools A research report submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Masters in Education (Educational Psychology) in the Humanities Faculty, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. Hendrik Petrus Mostert 0207843W Supervisor: Dr. Charmaine Gordon Department of Psychology School of Human and Community Development University of the Witwatersrand DECLARATION I declare that this research report is my own, unaided work. It is being submitted for the degree of Masters in Education (Educational Psychology) in the Department of Psychology, School of Human and Community Development, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. It has not been submitted before for any degree or examination at any other university. Signed: ____________________________ Hendrik Petrus Mostert Date: ______________________________ i TABLE OF CONTENTS DECLARATION .......................................................................................................................................... i TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................... ii LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................................ v LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Judgment As Approved by the Court
    Case No: C/2001/1336 Neutral Citation Number: [2002] EWCA Civ 567 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM THE IMMIGRATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Friday 26th April 2002 Before: LORD JUSTICE AULD LORD JUSTICE WALLER and LADY JUSTICE ARDEN - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between: SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME Appellant DEPARTMENT - and - SKENDERAJ Respondent - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (Transcript of the Handed Down Judgment of Smith Bernal Reporting Limited, 190 Fleet Street London EC4A 2AG Tel No: 020 7421 4040, Fax No: 020 7831 8838 Official Shorthand Writers to the Court) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Stephen Vokes (instructed by Nelsons) for the Appellant Eleanor Grey (instructed by The Treasury Solicitors) for the Respondent - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Judgment As Approved by the Court Crown Copyright © Lord Justice Auld: 1. This appeal concerns the definition of refugee in Article 1(A) of the Geneva Convention of 28th July 1951 in its application to non-state persecution. In particular, it is concerned, in the context of Albanian blood feuds, with the definition and consequence of membership of a “particular social group” and the availability and sufficiency of protection when it is not sought. The material words of Article 1A are that: “ … the term ’refugee’ shall apply to any person who:… owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion, is outside the country of his nationality and is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country; … ” 2. Hasan Skederaj, a citizen of Albania, appeals against the decision of the Immigration Appeal Tribunal declining to uphold the determination of an adjudicator that he should be granted asylum.
    [Show full text]
  • Handbook on Justice for Victims Was Developed in Response to That Resolution
    This Handbook was prepared by a group of experts from more than 40 countries at a series of meetings supported by the Office for Victims of Crime in the United States Department of Justice and the Ministry of Justice in the Netherlands. The document was developed in cooperation with the United Nations Office at Vienna, Centre for International Crime Prevention, Office for Drug Control and Crime Prevention, and its publication was generously funded by the Office for Victims of Crime, United States Department of Justice. Foreword Crime takes an enormous physical, financial and emotional toll on its victims. On 29 November 1985, the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted the Declaration of Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power (General Assembly resolution 40/34, annex) based on the conviction that victims should be treated with compassion and respect for their dignity and that they are entitled to prompt redress for the harm that they have suffered, through access to the criminal justice system, reparation and services to assist their recovery. The Declaration recommends measures to be taken on behalf of victims of crime at the international, regional and national levels to improve access to justice and fair treatment, restitution, compensation and assistance. It also outlines the main steps to be taken to prevent victimization linked to abuse of power and to provide remedies for the victims. In May 1996, the United Nations Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice, at its fifth session, adopted a resolution to develop a manual or manuals on the use and application of the Declaration (Economic and Social Council resolution 1996/14).
    [Show full text]
  • Bullying and Harassment - What's the Difference? Bullying and Harassment - What's the Difference?
    Leadership & Strategy » HR for Leaders » Bullying » Bullying and Harassment - What's the Difference? Bullying and Harassment - What's the Difference? Bullying and harassment are terms that are used interchangeably by organisations, with bullying often regarded as a type of harassment. There are, however, some notable differences, which are particularly important to bear in mind if you are drawing up an anti-bullying policy. This article gives an overview of what these main differences are. Defining harassment Definitions of harassment tend to refer to behaviour which is offensive and intrusive, with a sexual, racial or physical element. ACAS defines harassment as: ‘Unwanted conduct that violates people’s dignity or creates an intimidating hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment.’ [1] Harassment is covered in law by acts such as the Sex Discrimination Act, the Race Relations Act, the Disability Discrimination Act and the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act, as well as the laws of common assault. Defining bullying There are many ways to define bullying, with no single definition used across the board. ACAS, again, suggests the following: ‘Offensive, intimidating, malicious or insulting behaviour, an abuse or misuse of power through means intended to undermine, humiliate, denigrate or injure the recipient.’ The Andrea Adams Trust defined bullying as: [2] Unwarranted humiliating or offensive behaviour towards an individual or groups of employees. Persistently negative malicious attacks on personal or professional performance typically characterised as unpredictable, unfair, irrational and often unseen. An abuse of power or position that can cause such anxiety that people gradually lose all belief in themselves, suffering physical ill health and mental distress as a direct result.
    [Show full text]
  • Victims of Hate Crime
    Role of the judiciary in the protection of procedural rights of hate crime victims Antisemitism and Hate Crimes Dr Sławomir Buczma Council of Europe’s response to HC and HS European Convention on Human Rights of 1950 (ECHR) The Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities of 1994 (FCNM) - prohibits discrimination and obliges Parties to guarantee persons belonging to national minorities the right of equality before the law and of equal protection of the law. The Additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime of 2003 aims to harmonise the criminalisation of acts of a racist and xenophobic nature committed through computer systems, such as dissemination of racist and xenophobic material, racist and xenophobic motivated threat, similarly insult, and denial, gross minimisation, approval or justification of genocide or crimes against humanity. Recommendation Rec(2006)8 on assistance to crime victims Possible future update? EU laws Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union The EU values respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities. These values are common to the Member States in a society in which pluralism, non-discrimination, tolerance, justice, solidarity and equality between women and men prevail. Article 10 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU): In defining and implementing its policies and activities, the Union shall aim to combat discrimination based on sex, racial or ethnic
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Legal Definitions of Discrimination and Unlawful
    The Equality Act: Guidance for small businesses Understanding legal definitions of discrimination and unlawful behaviour in the Equality Act Understanding legal definitions of discrimination and unlawful behaviour in the Equality Act This guide explains the legal definitions and types of discrimination and harassment set out in the Equality Act 2010. The Equality Act sets out your responsibilities as an employer and how you provide services to the public. The Act means treating everyone fairly, with dignity and respect. Your business’s policies for recruitment, promotion and management of staff should help you to stay within the law, attract talented employees and get the best out of them. Businesses which recruit from the widest possible talent pool will attract the best staff. Workplace policies that prevent discrimination and harassment, and that allow your employees to balance their work and home lives, will help you to retain workers and reduce your recruitment costs. By being aware of the diverse needs of your customers, you could identify new products and markets. Your customers’ buying decisions are also influenced by your reputation. What is the Equality Act? The Equality Act 2010 brought together and updated a wide range of laws passed since the 1970s into one place, to make things fairer for everyone. It sets out the personal characteristics that are protected by law and the behaviour that is unlawful. The Act is a simplification of previous anti-discrimination laws and is not designed to create additional paper work for employers. It applies to businesses of any size, so it is important to understand what it means.
    [Show full text]
  • Communities, Social Exclusion and Crime
    Crime Cover FINAL NEW 23/2/04 2:38 pm Page 1 communities, social exclusion and crime The Smith Institute The Smith Institute is an independent think tank that has been set up to look at issues which flow from the changing relationship between social values and economic imperatives. If you would like to know more about the Smith Institute please write to: communities, socialexclusionandcrime communities, Edited by John Grieve CBE QPM The Director The Smith Institute and Roger Howard 3rd Floor 52 Grosvenor Gardens London SW1W 0AW Telephone +44 (0)20 7823 4240 Fax +44 (0)20 7823 4823 Email [email protected] Website www.smith-institute.org.uk Designed and produced by Owen & Owen 2004 THE SMITH INSTITUTE THE SMITH INSTITUTE communities, social exclusion and crime Edited by John Grieve CBE QPM and Roger Howard Published by the Smith Institute ISBN 1 902488 67 9 © The Smith Institute 2004 THE SMITH INSTITUTE Contents Preface 3 By Wilf Stevenson, director, Smith Institute Foreword 4 By Rt Hon David Blunkett MP, home secretary Introduction 6 By John Grieve CBE QPM and Roger Howard Chapter 1: How businesses and communities can break the 11 cycle of crime and decline By Barbara Roche MP Chapter 2: Hope, not fear, is the key 23 By Professor Roger Graef Chapter 3: Getting to grips with antisocial behaviour 35 By Professor Mike Hough and Dr Jessica Jacobson Chapter 4: The role of community policing in civil renewal 43 By Matthew Baggott QPM Chapter 5: Exercising rights as the way to social inclusion 55 By Alison Hannah Chapter 6: Improving
    [Show full text]