DOCSLIB.ORG

Project “Baltic Loop” Dialogues Between Different Transportation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Project “Baltic Loop” Dialogues Between Different Transportation Project “Baltic Loop” Dialogues Between Different Transportation Actors Deliverable: 5.4.1. Final report - Collected operators’ opinions along corridors Deliverable: 5.8.1. Practical solutions – Tools for better delivery and passenger transport. WP5 / Activity 5.4.& Activity 5.8./ Deliverable: 5.4.1. Final report - Collected operators’ April/2021 opinions along corridors & Deliverable: 5.8.1. Practical solutions – Tools for better delivery and passenger transport. Authors: Region Örebro County Turku University of Applied Sciences (TUAS) Åbo Academy University (AAU) Riga Planning Region Vidzeme Planning Region Ventspils High Technology Park Union of Harju County Municipalities SIA Ardenis April 2021 Legal notice The sole responsibility for the content of this publication lies with the authors. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Union. Neither the Interreg Central Baltic programme nor the European Commission is responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. All rights reserved; no part of this publication may be translated, reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, re-cording or otherwise, without the written permission of the publisher. 2 WP5/Guidelines for future cooperation www.balticloop.eu WP5 / Activity 5.4.& Activity 5.8./ Deliverable: 5.4.1. Final report - Collected operators’ April/2021 opinions along corridors & Deliverable: 5.8.1. Practical solutions – Tools for better delivery and passenger transport. Table of Contents Table of Contents ....................................................................................................... 3 Table of Figures .......................................................................................................... 6 Terms and abbreviations ............................................................................................ 7 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 8 Overview of Activities ............................................................................................... 10 Baltic Loop stakeholders........................................................................................... 17 The context for the Baltic Loop partner countries ..................................................... 21 Main findings: Cooperation issues ............................................................................ 25 Latvia ..................................................................................................................... 26 Sweden ................................................................................................................. 36 Chamber of Commerce Mälardalen .................................................................. 37 Region Örebro County....................................................................................... 38 Business Region Örebro (BRO) ........................................................................ 39 Port of Stockholm and Mälarhamnar ................................................................. 40 Oslo-Stockholm 2.55 AB ................................................................................... 41 Finland .................................................................................................................. 42 Estonia .................................................................................................................. 44 Stakeholder discussion recommendations ............................................................... 47 Latvia ..................................................................................................................... 48 Cooperation for development of long-term integrated concepts and implementation of sustainable urban mobility planning (SUMP) approach ........ 48 Development of cooperation with science, research and education .................. 49 Building collaborative platforms ......................................................................... 49 3 WP5/Guidelines for future cooperation www.balticloop.eu WP5 / Activity 5.4.& Activity 5.8./ Deliverable: 5.4.1. Final report - Collected operators’ April/2021 opinions along corridors & Deliverable: 5.8.1. Practical solutions – Tools for better delivery and passenger transport. Stakeholder cooperation in the Riga City and metropolitan area ....................... 51 Improving the quality of communication and cooperation .................................. 52 Cooperation to protect their national, regional or local interests ........................ 53 Issues at national level ...................................................................................... 53 Understanding of the transport corridor and systematic services provision in the corridor .............................................................................................................. 54 Cooperation in individual major projects or initiatives at national level .............. 54 Use of strengths ................................................................................................ 55 Sweden ................................................................................................................. 56 Mälardalen Chamber of Commerce .................................................................. 56 Stockholm-Oslo 2.55 ......................................................................................... 56 Finland .................................................................................................................. 57 Estonia .................................................................................................................. 58 General long-term collaboration issues ............................................................. 58 Digitalization and other incentives for logistics sector........................................ 59 Estonian Northern railway corridor improvements ............................................. 59 Further food for thought ..................................................................................... 60 Theoretical aspects of stakeholder dialogue............................................................. 61 Good examples of partner cooperation in transport sector ....................................... 68 Latvia ..................................................................................................................... 68 Riga Metropolitan Area Mobility Spatial Vision .................................................. 68 Via Hanseatica tourism and transport corridor development vision 2030 .......... 70 Ventspils High Technology Park cooperation with ports and terminals ............. 72 Finland .................................................................................................................. 74 4 WP5/Guidelines for future cooperation www.balticloop.eu WP5 / Activity 5.4.& Activity 5.8./ Deliverable: 5.4.1. Final report - Collected operators’ April/2021 opinions along corridors & Deliverable: 5.8.1. Practical solutions – Tools for better delivery and passenger transport. New consortiums to proceed large infrastructure projects that are outside Ministry based budget ..................................................................................................... 74 The Northern Growth Zone ................................................................................ 76 Joint terminal project in the Port of Turku .......................................................... 78 Sweden ................................................................................................................. 80 Mälarpendeln – cooperation between Port of Stockholm, Hutchison Ports Stockholm, Mälarhamnar and Wallenius Marine ............................................... 80 Estonia .................................................................................................................. 82 Tallinn – Harju mobility council .......................................................................... 82 A People First approach to increase equity in public transit stops in Harju County .......................................................................................................................... 85 Joint conclusions and recommendations .................................................................. 87 Literature references ................................................................................................ 92 5 WP5/Guidelines for future cooperation www.balticloop.eu WP5 / Activity 5.4.& Activity 5.8./ Deliverable: 5.4.1. Final report - Collected operators’ April/2021 opinions along corridors & Deliverable: 5.8.1. Practical solutions – Tools for better delivery and passenger transport. Table of Figures Figure 1 Stakeholder meeting in Riga on September 22, 2020 ................................ 14 Figure 2. Example of the international section of the cooperation platform .............. 16 Figure 3. Stakeholder representation by legal form and country .............................. 18 Figure 4. Stakeholders by the corridor of operations ................................................ 19 Figure 5. Stakeholders’ work area by country ........................................................... 20 Figure 6. Logistics performance index in the Baltic Loop partner countries (2018) .. 23 Figure 7. Stakeholder consultation model. ..............................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fourth Report to the Council and the European Parliament on Monitoring Development in the Rail Market
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 13.6.2014 COM(2014) 353 final PART 1/2 REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Fourth report on monitoring development of the rail market {SWD(2014) 186 final} EN EN REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Fourth report on monitoring development of the rail market TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Evolution of internal market in rail services................................................................ 4 1.1. The objectives of the White Paper on Transport (2011).............................................. 4 1.2. The passenger rail market today .................................................................................. 5 1.3. Evolution of the passenger rail market......................................................................... 8 1.4. The rail freight market today........................................................................................ 9 1.5. Evolution of the rail freight market.............................................................................. 9 2. Evolution of the internal market in services to be supplied to railway undertakings 11 2.1. Stations....................................................................................................................... 11 2.1.1. Stations across the European Union........................................................................... 11 2.1.2. Ownership and management...................................................................................... 12 2.1.3. Access
    [Show full text]
  • Health Systems in Transition
    61575 Latvia HiT_2_WEB.pdf 1 03/03/2020 09:55 Vol. 21 No. 4 2019 Vol. Health Systems in Transition Vol. 21 No. 4 2019 Health Systems in Transition: in Transition: Health Systems C M Y CM MY CY CMY K Latvia Latvia Health system review Daiga Behmane Alina Dudele Anita Villerusa Janis Misins The Observatory is a partnership, hosted by WHO/Europe, which includes other international organizations (the European Commission, the World Bank); national and regional governments (Austria, Belgium, Finland, Kristine Klavina Ireland, Norway, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the Veneto Region of Italy); other health system organizations (the French National Union of Health Insurance Funds (UNCAM), the Dzintars Mozgis Health Foundation); and academia (the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) and the Giada Scarpetti London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (LSHTM)). The Observatory has a secretariat in Brussels and it has hubs in London at LSE and LSHTM) and at the Berlin University of Technology. HiTs are in-depth profiles of health systems and policies, produced using a standardized approach that allows comparison across countries. They provide facts, figures and analysis and highlight reform initiatives in progress. Print ISSN 1817-6119 Web ISSN 1817-6127 61575 Latvia HiT_2_WEB.pdf 2 03/03/2020 09:55 Giada Scarpetti (Editor), and Ewout van Ginneken (Series editor) were responsible for this HiT Editorial Board Series editors Reinhard Busse, Berlin University of Technology, Germany Josep Figueras, European
    [Show full text]
  • Study on Border Crossing Practices in International Railway Transport
    STUDY ON BORDER CROSSING PRACTICES IN INTERNATIONAL RAILWAY TRANSPORT Bangkok, 2018 This study was prepared by Transport Division ESCAP. The draft of the study was prepared by Mr. Goran Andreev, Consultant, under the supervision of Mr. Sandeep Raj Jain, Economic Affairs Officer, Transport Facilitation and Logistics Section (TFLS), Transport Division. Overall guidance was provided by Mr. Li Yuwei, Director, Transport Division. The study extensively benefited from the visits made by the ESCAP study team to several border crossings (in chronological order): Sukhbaatar (Mongolia), Dong Dang (Viet Nam), Padang Besar (Malaysia), Sarkhas (Islamic Republic of Iran), Rezekne (Latvia). The assistance provided by the railways, customs and other authorities at these border crossings, their officers and staff for the study is duly appreciated. Acknowledgments are also extended to the representatives of Intergovernmental Organisation for International Carriage by Rail (OTIF) and Organisation for Co- operation between Railways (OSJD), for their constructive comments on the draft Study and the contribution in providing valuable inputs on the publication. The views expressed in this guide are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations Secretariat. The opinions, figures and estimates set forth in this guide are the responsibility of the authors, and should not necessarily be considered as reflecting the views or carrying the endorsement of the United Nations. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this study do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • ILCAD 2016, 10 June in Riga and 11 June in Tallinn PROGRAMME (Draft)
    International Conference on “how to improve safety at and around level crossings” ILCAD 2016, 10 June in Riga and 11 June in Tallinn PROGRAMME (draft) 1. Riga, 10 June 2016 a. Venue: Latvian Railway Museum, Riga, Uzvaras bulv. 2A ; Latvia 09:30 – 10.00 – registration, welcome coffee (with compliments of OPTEX) www.optex-europe.com 10:00 – 10.50 – opening (official speeches, media/public event) Keynote Speakers : 1. Ministry of Transport (tbc) 2. SJSC “Latvian Railways”, Chairman of the Board and President, Mr. Edvins Berzins 3. UIC: Mr. Peter Gerhardt/Head of UIC Safety Unit 11.00 – 13.00 Presentations (1 st part) • 11:00-11:20 Agency TBWA Latvija: Mrs. Anna Ranc āne, Strategist; Mr. Edijs Vucens, Head of Media Arts: “SJSC “Latvian Railway” Safety Campaign “Don’t overestimate your abilities near railways”” • 11:20-11:40 University of Latvia: Mr. Ivars Austers, Professor of Social Psychology: “Railway crossing safety: Self-reported risk perception and behaviours in population of Latvia” • 11:40-12:00 Latvian Road Traffic Safety Directorate: Mrs. Valda Kjaspere: „Cooperation between different organizations in order to decrease number of accidents“ • 12:00-12:20 Operation Lifesaver Estonia (OLE): Mrs. Getter Toome: "Educational material for driving schools” • 12:20-12:40 PKP (Polish Railways): Mrs. Katarzyna Kucharek, “Activities at rail- road level crossings carried out in Poland” • 12:40-13:00 OPTEX, Mr. Dale Jones: “Lidar” to detect larger objects and vehicles” + product exhibited 13:00 – 14.00 – lunch (with compliments of LDz) + exhibition 14.00 – 16.00 – Presentations (2 nd part) • 14:00 – 14:30 Inspector Becky Warren , British Transport Police, UK Network Rail, UK: Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic and Social Council Distr
    UNITED E NATIONS Economic and Social Council Distr. GENERAL TRANS/WP.5/2002/1/Add.2 14 June 2002 Original: ENGLISH ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE INLAND TRANSPORT COMMITTEE Working Party on Transport Trends and Economics (Fifteenth session, 2- 4 September 2002, agenda item 5) DEVELOPMENT REGARDING TRANSPORT POLICIES Replies to the questionnaire on transport development Addendum 2 Transmitted by the Government of Latvia Note: At its fifty-ninth session the Inland Transport Committee, following an earlier decision taken at its fortieth session (ECE/TRANS/42, para. 45), agreed to circulate the questionnaire on the most significant criteria for the determination of new and important developments with regard to inland transport in the member countries of general interest to Governments (ECE/TRANS/119, para. 52). * * * TRANS/WP.5/2002/1/Add.2 page 2 I. General transport policy aspects 1. 1.1. The Government of the Republic of Latvia has two programmes on transport policy in general: - National Transport Development Programme (2000-2006 year) - Railway Transport Development State Programme (1995-2010 year) The “Declaration on the intended activities of the Cabinet of Ministers” envisages the following activities regarding the development of the transport system: - Creation of a stable and long-term road network financing system according to the principle adopted in the road sector that the road user pays for road use. The distribution of revenues from the excise duty on oil products has been achieved up until April 2002: 60% in the special State budget – the State Road Fund (SRF) and 40% in the State consolidated budget instead of the previous distribution of 50% / 50%.
    [Show full text]
  • The Saeima (Parliament) Election
    /pub/public/30067.html Legislation / The Saeima Election Law Unofficial translation Modified by amendments adopted till 14 July 2014 As in force on 19 July 2014 The Saeima has adopted and the President of State has proclaimed the following law: The Saeima Election Law Chapter I GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. Citizens of Latvia who have reached the age of 18 by election day have the right to vote. (As amended by the 6 February 2014 Law) 2.(Deleted by the 6 February 2014 Law). 3. A person has the right to vote in any constituency. 4. Any citizen of Latvia who has reached the age of 21 before election day may be elected to the Saeima unless one or more of the restrictions specified in Article 5 of this Law apply. 5. Persons are not to be included in the lists of candidates and are not eligible to be elected to the Saeima if they: 1) have been placed under statutory trusteeship by the court; 2) are serving a court sentence in a penitentiary; 3) have been convicted of an intentionally committed criminal offence except in cases when persons have been rehabilitated or their conviction has been expunged or vacated; 4) have committed a criminal offence set forth in the Criminal Law in a state of mental incapacity or a state of diminished mental capacity or who, after committing a criminal offence, have developed a mental disorder and thus are incapable of taking or controlling a conscious action and as a result have been subjected to compulsory medical measures, or whose cases have been dismissed without applying such compulsory medical measures; 5) belong
    [Show full text]
  • Commission Staff Working Document Impact
    Council of the European Union Brussels, 22 November 2017 (OR. en) 12442/17 Interinstitutional File: ADD 3 REV 1 2017/0237 (COD) TRANS 370 CODEC 1477 CONSOM 307 COVER NOTE From: Secretary-General of the European Commission, signed by Mr Jordi AYET PUIGARNAU, Director date of receipt: 21 November 2017 To: Mr Jeppe TRANHOLM-MIKKELSEN, Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union No. Cion doc.: SWD(2017) 318 final/2 Subject: COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT Accompanying the document Proposal for a Regulation from the European Parliament and the Council on rail passengers' rights and obligations (recast) Delegations will find attached document SWD(2017) 318 final/2. Encl.: SWD(2017) 318 final/2 12442/17 ADD 3 REV 1 TA/el DGE 2A EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 21.11.2017 SWD(2017) 318 final/2 CORRIGENDUM This document corrects document SWD(2017) 318 final of 27.9.2017 Missing annexes are added The text shall read as follows: COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT Accompanying the document Proposal for a Regulation from the European Parliament and the Council on rail passengers' rights and obligations (recast) EN EN Table of Contents 1 WHAT IS THE PROBLEM AND WHY IS IT A PROBLEM? ........................... 5 1.1 Policy Context and Key Problems at Stake ................................................... 5 1.2 Description of the main problems linked to the current application of the rail passenger rights legislation (Part I) ........................................... 11 1.2.1 Major issues with the regulation .................................................................. 11 1.2.1.1 Problems linked to the scope of the rail passenger rights legislation (Exemptions) ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CASE AT.39813 Baltic Rail ANTITRUST PROCEDURE Council
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION DG Competition CASE AT.39813 Baltic rail (Only the English text is authentic) ANTITRUST PROCEDURE Council Regulation (EC) 1/2003 Article 7 Regulation (EC) 1/2003 Date: 02/10/2017 This text is made available for information purposes only. A summary of this decision is published in all EU languages in the Official Journal of the European Union. Parts of this text have been edited to ensure that confidential information is not disclosed. Those parts are replaced by a non-confidential summary in square brackets or are shown as […]. EN EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 2.10.2017 C(2017) 6544 final COMMISSION DECISION of 2.10.2017 relating to proceedings under Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union AT.39813 - Baltic Rail (Only the English text is authentic) EN EN TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 8 2. Parties to the proceedings ............................................................................................. 8 2.1. The addressee of the decision ...................................................................................... 8 2.2. The complainant ........................................................................................................... 8 3. Procedure ...................................................................................................................... 9 4. Description of LG's practices which are the subject of this decision ........................
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals
    Latvia 1 Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals Report to the UN High Level Political Forum on Sustainable Development 2018 1 Latvia Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals Report to the UN High Level Political Forum on Sustainable Development 2018 Table of contents 1. Opening Remarks by the Prime Minister​ Page 4–5 2. 3. 5. Introduction Summary – Latvia’s Linking National Page 6–7 Sustainability Development Latvia’s Future Planning with SDGs Opportunities and the Enabling Innovative and Eco- Environment efficient Economy Page 28–39 Reducing income and opportunity inequality Page 8–19 4. 6. Preparation of the Evaluation of SDG and Review Target Implementation Page 20–27 in Latvia Page 40–98 SDG 1: End poverty in all its forms 47 SDG 12: Ensure sustainable 77 everywhere consumption and production SDG 2: End hunger, achieve food 49 patterns security and improved SDG 13: Take urgent actions to 80 nutrition and promote combat climate change and sustainable agriculture its effects SDG 3: Ensure healthy lives and 51 SDG 14: Conserve and sustainably 83 promote well-being for all at use the oceans, seas all ages and marine resources for SGD 4: Ensure inclusive and 54 sustainable development equitable education and SDG 15: Protect, restore and promote 86 promote lifelong learning sustainable use of terrestrial opportunities for all​ ecosystems, sustainably SDG 5: Achieve gender equality and 57 manage forests, combat empower all women and desertification, and halt and girls reverse land degradation SDG 6: Ensure availability
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Governance in Latvia
    Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques Hosted by The Government of Lithuania CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN LATVIA by Mr. Alf Vanags Euro Faculty, University of Latvia, Queen Mary and Westfield College, University of London LATVIA and Mr. Aigars Štrupišs Institute of Latvia LATVIA Seminar on CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN THE BALTICS Vilnius, Lithuania 21-22 October, 1999 Seminar on Corporate Governance in the Baltics 21-22 October, 1999 - Vilnius BACKGROUND PAPER on CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN LATVIA TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS..................................................................................................................................... 2 SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................................................... 3 PART I. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................. 4 PART II. THE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ENVIRONMENT IN LATVIA ......................................... 4 THE GENERAL ECONOMIC CONTEXT .................................................................................................................. 4 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE CHARACTERISTICS IN LATVIA.................................................................................. 5 The Corporate Governance Agents ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Siafinternational - Edition 2014 a DYNAMIC ACTION LEARNING PROGRAMME for FUTURE ORIENTED RAILWAY PROFESSIONALS with an INTEREST in INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION
    SIAFInternational - Edition 2014 A DYNAMIC ACTION LEARNING PROGRAMME FOR FUTURE ORIENTED RAILWAY PROFESSIONALS WITH AN INTEREST IN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION SESSION 1: 14 - 18 April 2014 — SESSION 2: 22 - 26 September 2014 WELCOME TO UIC One of the three key pillars of sustainability, along with environmental and economic issues, is the social dimension. Training, education and workforce development are essential to anticipate the current transformations that are taking place in many industries, including rail. Railways are facing numerous challenges: market liberalisation, internationalisation, global supply chains, new technologies, increased service expectations, new social frameworks, changing demographics with a loss of corporate knowledge, to name but a few. To accompany these changes and support its members in their approaches and efforts, the UIC general assembly of december 2012 voted a global project “Global Network of Railway Talents ”, which aims to create a strong and sustainable foundation for fostering international cooperation among ambitious and open minded railway professionals. One important objective of the project is also to facilitate the sharing of knowledge, values and experience between different generations of railway people, as well as to stimulate the active dialogue between cultures and generations based on the principles of openness, respect and equality. The project is based on a set of complementary activities currently under development, such as the adaptation of the recognized SIAFI training programme to the evolving needs of railway companies and participants, as well as a stronger cooperation with universities and academia to better connect students and young researchers to the railway sector. In addition, a web-based platform aims to foster dynamic and ongoing exchanges between the network participants and its numerous stakeholders.
    [Show full text]
  • The Leba Ridge–Riga–Pskov Fault Zone – a Major East European Craton Interior Dislocation Zone and Its Role in the Early Palaeozoic Development of the Platform Cover
    Estonian Journal of Earth Sciences, 2019, 68, 4, 161–189 https://doi.org/10.3176/earth.2019.12 The Leba Ridge–Riga–Pskov Fault Zone – a major East European Craton interior dislocation zone and its role in the early Palaeozoic development of the platform cover Igor Tuuling Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Ravila 14A, 50411 Tartu, Estonia; [email protected] Received 31 May 2019, accepted 23 July 2019, available online 24 October 2019 Abstract. Analysis of data published on basement faulting in the Baltic region makes it possible to distinguish the >700 km long East European Craton (EEC) interior fault zone extending from the Leba Ridge in the southern Baltic Sea across the Latvian cities of Liepaja and Riga to Pskov in Russia (LeRPFZ). The complex geometry and pattern of its faults, with different styles and flower structures, suggests that the LeRPFZ includes a significant horizontal component. Exceptionally high fault amplitudes with signs of pulsative activities reveal that the LeRPFZ has been acting as an early Palaeozoic tectonic hinge-line, accommodating bulk of the far-field stresses and dividing thus the NW EEC interior into NW and SW halves. The LeRPFZ has been playing a vital role in the evolution of the Baltic Ordovician–Silurian Basin, as a deep-facies protrusion of this basin (Livonian Tongue) extending into the remote NW EEC interior adheres to this fault zone. The Avalonia–Baltica collision record suggests that transpression with high shear stress, forcing the SE blocks in the LeRPFZ to move obliquely to the NE, reigned in the Ordovician.
    [Show full text]