The Economics of Mining Evolved More Favorably in Mexico Than Peru
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Latin American Per Capita GDP in Colonial Times
Growth under Extractive Institutions? Latin American Per Capita GDP in Colonial Times LETICIA ARROYO ABAD AND JAN LUITEN VAN ZANDEN This article presents new estimations of per capita GDP in colonial times for the WZRSLOODUVRIWKH6SDQLVKHPSLUH0H[LFRDQG3HUX:H¿QGG\QDPLFHFRQRPLHV DV HYLGHQFHG E\ LQFUHDVLQJ UHDO ZDJHV XUEDQL]DWLRQ DQG VLOYHU PLQLQJ 7KHLU JURZWK WUDMHFWRULHV DUH VXFK WKDW ERWK UHJLRQV UHGXFHG WKH JDSZLWK UHVSHFW WR 6SDLQ 0H[LFR HYHQ DFKLHYHG SDULW\ DW WLPHV :KLOH H[SHULHQFLQJ VZLQJV LQ JURZWKWKHQRWDEOHWXUQLQJSRLQWLVLQVDVERWWOHQHFNVLQSURGXFWLRQDQG ODWHUWKHLQGHSHQGHQFHZDUVUHGXFHGHFRQRPLFDFWLYLW\2XUUHVXOWVTXHVWLRQWKH notion that colonial institutions impoverished Latin America. Q WKH WDOHV RI XQGHUGHYHORSPHQW /DWLQ $PHULFD LV D IUHTXHQW FKDU- IDFWHU6FRUHVRIDUWLFOHVDQGERRNVDUHGHYRWHGWRWKHSUREOHPRIWKH /DWLQ$PHULFDQHFRQRPLFODJ*LYHQWKHULFKHQGRZPHQWVZK\GLGWKH UHJLRQIDLOWRFRQYHUJHWRWKHVWDQGDUGVRIOLYLQJRIWKHGHYHORSHGZRUOG" &RPSDULVRQVWRDYDULHW\RIGHYHORSHGDQGGHYHORSLQJFRXQWULHVDERXQG ZLWKWKHREOLJDWRU\FRQFOXVLRQRIWKHUHJLRQ¶VVTXDQGHUHGRSSRUWXQLWLHV WR MXPS RQ WKH JURZWK ZDJRQ ([SODLQLQJ WKH HFRQRPLF JDS EHWZHHQ /DWLQ$PHULFDDQGWKHGHYHORSHGZRUOGKDVPRWLYDWHGDODUJHVKDUHRIWKH UHFHQWVFKRODUVKLSRQWKHHFRQRPLFKLVWRU\RIWKHUHJLRQ VHH&RDWVZRUWK DQG6XPPHUKLOO +LVWRULFDOZRUNRQ/DWLQ$PHULFDKDVRIWHQORRNHGDWWKH³SDWKGHSHQ- GHQFH´ZKHUHWKHRULJLQRIWKHGHYHORSPHQWSDWKLVWUDFHGEDFNWRWKH FRORQLDOSHULRG (QJHUPDQDQG6RNRORII$FHPRJOX-RKQVRQDQG 5RELQVRQ $V -RVp 0DUWt QRWHG RQFH 1RUWK $PHULFD ZDV ERUQ ZLWKDSORXJKLQLWVKDQG/DWLQ$PHULFDZLWKDKXQWLQJGRJ &HQWURGH The Journal -
Division of Mines and Mining
STATE OF WASHINGTON ARTHUR B. LANGLIE, GOVERNOR Department of Conservation and Development JOHN BROOKE FINK, Director THIRD BIENNIAL REPORT of the DIVISION OF MINES AND MINING For the Period Commencing January 1, 1939 and Ending January 1, 1941 By THOMAS B. HILL, SUPERVISOR J . w. MELROSE, GEOLOGIST OLYMPIA STATE PRI NTINC PLANT DIVISION OF MINES AND MINING Hon. John Brooke Fink, Director, Department of Conservation and Development, Olympia, Washington. Sir: I have the honor to submit herewith the third biennial report of the Division of Mines and Mining, covering the period from January l, 1939, to January 1, 1941. Respectfully, THOMAS B. HILL, Supervisor. DIVISION OF MINES AND MINING THOMAS B. HILL Supervisor SUMMARY OF MINERAL INFORMATION The present widespread interest in the mineral resources of Washington had its beginning in 1933 when the Director of the Department of Conserva tion and Devlopment devoted a substantial part of an allocation of $80,000 from Washington Emergency Relief Administration to mineral investigations. Two years later, the Division of Mines and Mining was created, and has continued the investigations, the work of compiling information and promoting the development of the mineral resources. Extensive information had been developed on the mineral resources of the State in the previous twenty-five years, largely through the Washington Geological Survey and the Division of Geology. This information had been published in some 50 or more bulletins and 1·eports, about half of which are now out of print. The information, while extensive, was scattered and in many instances fragmentary. The result of the work begun by the Department in 1933, and continued by this Division since 1935, is that now information is available on all the known mineral occurrences of the State. -
The Mexican Mining Bubble That Burst1
CHAPTER 34 The Mexican Mining Bubble that Burst1 Ivani Vassoler Similar to the 17th century “Tulipmania” in Holland when tulip bulbs became a top commodity causing a speculative fever that, in the end, ruined thousands of Dutch investors,2 Mexico, in the first decades of the 19th cen- tury, became a hot spot for Europeans eager to reap huge profits from Mexi- can silver mines. Yet the mine-investing rush quickly proved to be much less profitable than European investors assumed, and foreign companies with- drew from Mexico, thus souring the newly independent country’s relation- ship with international investors. While the episode undoubtedly created a bumpy start for an emerging nation desperately in need of capital to finance its development, much less clear, however, is why it happened. As the expec- tations of high investment returns went unfulfilled, financiers in Europe alleged the one mostly to blame was Alexander von Humboldt (Kellner 1963, 110) for his assessment of the Mexican mines’ potential, described in details in his Political Essay on the Kingdom of New Spain (1811). The accusations therefore raise questions as to what really prompted the cash. Did Humboldt exaggerate the quality and abundance of minerals in Mexico and their poten- tial for huge profits, or were his writings misinterpreted, and possibly dis- torted, by financial experts? Was the crash, in the end, just the product of investors’ greed? 1. During colonial times Mexico, was for the Spanish Crown, simply New Spain. In this article New Spain and Mexico will be employed interchangeably for the sake and clarity of my arguments. -
Technical Report Getchell Project NI 43-101 Technical Report Premier Gold Mines Limited and I-80 Gold Corp
AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd. BC0767129 200 Granville Street, Suite 202 Vancouver BC V6C 1S4 Canada T +1 604 669 0044 E [email protected] W amcconsultants.com Technical Report Getchell Project NI 43-101 Technical Report Premier Gold Mines Limited and i-80 Gold Corp Humboldt County, Nevada, USA In accordance with the requirements of National Instrument 43-101 “Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects” of the Canadian Securities Administrators Qualified Persons: D Nussipakynova, P.Geo. P Greenhill, FAusIMM (CP) AMC Project 720031 Effective date 23 July 2020 Report date 22 January 2021 Unearth a smarter way Getchell Project NI 43-101 Technical Report Premier Gold Mines Limited and i-80 Gold Corp 720031 1 Summary 1.1 Introduction This Technical Report (the Report) provides an update of the Mineral Resource estimates and metallurgy of the Mineral Resources identified within the Getchell Project (Property) located in Humboldt County, Nevada, USA. The Report has been prepared by AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd. (AMC) of Vancouver, Canada on behalf of Premier Gold Mines Limited / i-80 Gold Corp (i-80 or the Companies). On 10 August 2020, Premier entered into a definitive purchase agreement with affiliates of Waterton Global Resource Management, Inc. to acquire from Waterton all of the outstanding membership interests of Osgood Mining Company LLC (OMC). The Property comprises a number of property parcels which collectively encompass 2,545 acres in the Potosi mining district. The four-square miles of land contain all areas of past gold production and the area of the currently estimated Mineral Resource. This area includes the historical Pinson Mine. -
A Century of Silver Mining Since 1863 Has Made Idaho Into the Nation's Leading Silver State. in the Hundred Years from 1864 Thro
IDAHO STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY REFERENCE SERIES SILVER MINING IN IDAHO Number 160 December 1964 A century of silver mining since 1863 has made Idaho into the nation's leading silver state. In the hundred years from 1864 through 1964, a total production of about 786 million ounces has been attained. Figured at varying prices realized over the years as the metal was recovered and sold, Idaho's silver production amounted to a total value of 613 million dollars. At the 1964 price level--which practically equals the $1.29 per ounce mint price--Idaho's silver is valued at about 1 billion, fifteen million dollars. Approximately 686 million ounces in production totals (over 885 million at 1964 prices) of this came from the Coeur d'Alene district, which has produced more than three times as much silver as has the celebrated Comstock in Nevada. four of the nation's largest silver mines are now in the Coeur d'Alene area, which in total production has surpassed all other silver regions in the United States. Lode mines which assayed high in silver were discovered March 7, 1863, near Rocky Bar, and several months later near Silver City. These early assays ran high in gold also, and the Rocky Bar properties proved to be primarily gold. Those near Silver City, however, turned out to be mainly silver, as did the mines discovered June 6, 1864, at Banner. Still another early mining camp with significant silver values was Atlanta, where gold placers found in the fall of 1864 were traces in part to the great Atlanta lode which showed promise for silver as well as for gold. -
The Candelaria Silver District, Nevada
THE CANDELARIA SILVER DISTRICT, NEVADA. By ADOLPH KNOPF. OUTLINE OF REPORT. Candelaria, an old silver-mining camp in western Nevada, has produced $20,000,000, mainly during the seventies and eighties of the last centjiry. The ore worked in those early days averaged $40, $50, or more a ton, but the bonanza ore has long been exhausted, and the attempt now being made to revive the camp is based on the belief that there is left a considerable amount of ore of moderate grade ore carrying 10 to 15 ounces of silver to the ton from which a profit may be won by applying modern methods of mining and metallurgy. The rocks of the district consist of a steeply dipping series of cherts, argillites, and felsites, all very probably of Ordovician age. These rocks have been intruded by peridotite or allied rock (now completely altered to serpentine) and quartz monzonite porphyry at Candelaria itself, and large intrusions of granite appear a few miles from the camp. Resting unconformably on this group of older rocks and showing by its complete lack of any alteration that it is later than the mineralization is a series of Tertiary volcanic rocks, mainly rhyolite lavas and tuffs. Later than both these groups are the series of horizontal basalt flows that form the prominent cappings of the district. These flows were sub sequently dislocated by normal faulting, and by this faulting the present relief of the district was determined. The silver ores are highly oxidized, forming a friable aggregate deeply stained by oxides of manganese and iron. -
Pervasive Arctic Lead Pollution Suggests Substantial Growth in Medieval Silver Production Modulated by Plague, Climate, and Conflict
Pervasive Arctic lead pollution suggests substantial growth in medieval silver production modulated by plague, climate, and conflict Joseph R. McConnella,1, Nathan J. Chellmana, Andrew I. Wilsonb,c, Andreas Stohld, Monica M. Arienzoa, Sabine Eckhardtd, Diedrich Fritzschee, Sepp Kipfstuhlf, Thomas Opele, Philip F. Placeg, and Jørgen Peder Steffensenh aDivision of Hydrologic Sciences, Desert Research Institute, Reno, NV 89512; bFaculty of Classics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3LU, United Kingdom; cInstitute of Archaeology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2PG, United Kingdom; dDepartment of Atmospheric and Climate Research, Norwegian Institute for Air Research, N-2027 Kjeller, Norway; ePolar Terrestrial Environmental Systems, Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar-und Meeresforschung, 14473 Potsdam, Germany; fGlaciology, Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar-und Meeresforschung, 27570 Bremerhaven, Germany; gEarth and Environmental Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627; and hCentre for Ice and Climate, University of Copenhagen, DK-1017 Copenhagen, Denmark Edited by Eric W. Wolff, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom, and accepted by Editorial Board Member A. R. Ravishankara June 13, 2019 (received for review March 15, 2019) Lead pollution in Arctic ice reflects large-scale historical changes in at the apogee of the Roman Empire indicated substantial economic midlatitude industrial activities such as ancient lead/silver pro- growth during the latter period. Particularly striking were pro- duction and recent fossil fuel burning. Here we used measure- nounced and lasting declines during the second-century Antonine ments in a broad array of 13 accurately dated ice cores from Plague and third-century Plague of Cyprian, suggesting low societal Greenland and Severnaya Zemlya to document spatial and tem- resilience to pestilence. -
4.5 Cultural Resources
4.5 – Cultural Resources 4.5 Cultural Resources This section identifies cultural and paleontological resources along the IC Project Alignment, identifies applicable significance thresholds, assesses the IC Project’s impacts to these resources and their significance, and recommends measures to avoid or substantially reduce any effects found to be potentially significant. Cultural resources are defined as any object or specific location of past human activity, occupation, or use that is identifiable through historical documentation, inventory, or oral evidence. Cultural resources can be separated into three categories: archaeological, building/structural, and traditional resources. Archaeological resources include prehistoric and historic remains of human activity. Prehistoric resources can be composed of lithic scatters, ceramic scatters, quarries, habitation sites, temporary camps/rock rings, ceremonial sites, and trails. Historic-era resources are typically those that are 50 years or older. Historic archaeological resources can consist of structural remains (e.g., concrete foundations), historic objects (e.g., bottles and cans), features (e.g., refuse deposits or scatters), and sites (e.g., resources that contain one or more of the aforementioned categories). Built environment resources range from historic buildings to canals, historic roads and trails, bridges, ditches, cemeteries, and electrical infrastructure, such as transmission lines, substations, and generating facilities. A traditional cultural resource is a resource associated with the cultural practices, traditions, beliefs, lifeways, arts, crafts, or social institutions of a living community. They are rooted in a traditional community’s history and are important in maintaining the continuing cultural identity of the community. See Section 4.18, Tribal Cultural Resources, for a discussion on cultural resources of potential importance to California Native American tribes. -
2019 Asset Handbook 2019 Asset Handbook
2019 Asset Handbook 2019 Asset Handbook Franco-Nevada Corporation’s 2019 Asset Handbook is intended to assist investors and analysts in their understanding of our business and portfolio of assets. Franco-Nevada Corporation is the leading gold royalty and streaming company with the largest and most diversified portfolio of assets. The Company’s business model provides investors with gold price and exploration optionality with less exposure to operating risks. Franco-Nevada has a strong balance sheet and uses its free cash flow to expand its portfolio and pay dividends. It trades under the symbol FNV on both the Toronto and New York stock exchanges. Since its IPO, Franco-Nevada’s share price has outperformed the gold price and all relevant gold equity benchmarks. Franco-Nevada is the gold investment that works. Information relating to projects, properties and their owners and operators presented in this Asset Handbook has been sourced from the public disclosure of the owners and operators of our assets available as of March 15, 2019. More current information may be available in our subsequent disclosure and our website. This Asset Handbook contains information about many of our assets, including those that may not currently be material to us. Also, the description and depiction of our business and assets have been simplified for presentation purposes. Dollar references are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted. This Asset Handbook should be read with reference to the explanatory notes and cautionary statements contained in the Additional Information section found at the end of this Asset Handbook. Please also refer to the additional supporting information and explanatory notes found in our Annual Information Form (“AIF”), our annual Management’s Discussion & Analysis (“MD&A“), and our Annual Report on Form 40-F available at www.sedar.com and www.sec.gov, respectively, and on our website at www.franco-nevada.com. -
Mining & Milling
Mining & Milling The Story of Park City 8TH GRADE SCIENCE CURRICULUM © Park City Historical Society & Museum All Rights Reserved These materials and the photographs are copyrighted by the Park City Historical Society & Museum. Permission is granted to make photocopies and transparencies of the handouts as directed in the lesson plans. Please contact the Park City Historical Society & Museum for permission to use materials for any other purpose. This program was developed by Johanna Fassbender, Curator of Education With special thanks to Richard Pick Keith J. Droste Thanks also to Courtney Cochley Josephine Janger David Hedderly-Smith James L. Hewitson Tom Barber Sydney Reed Park City Rotary Çlub Summit County Recreation, Arts and Parks Program The Underdog Foundation Dear Teachers, We hope that you will enjoy the 8th grade science curriculum and use it with your students to teach major physical and chemical con- cepts. Each lesson is keyed to the Utah Science Core Curriculum to help you deliver science instructions. Our curriculum includes history sections to provide the students with the appropriate background knowledge and get them excited about their hometown of Park City which was the unique setting for the science of mining and mineralo- gy. This goes along with our belief in an interdisciplinary approach which provides students with a more holistic knowledge and will empower them in future research projects. Almost all of the lesson plans allow for adjustments and provide you with different options, depending on the progress of your class. You can teach the entire curriculum within three weeks, or you can extend it to six weeks by slowing down the pace and reducing the workload. -
Silver and Gold (And Base Metals Too!)
January 2018 NYSE:HL Silver and Gold (and Base Metals Too!) Creating Short and Long Term Value Cautionary Statements NYSE:HL Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward Looking Statements, This presentation contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which are intended to be covered by the safe harbor created by such sections and other applicable laws, including Canadian Securities laws. Such forward-looking statements may include, without limitation: (i) estimates of future production and sales; (ii) estimates of future costs and cash cost, after by-product credits per ounce of silver/gold; (iii) guidance for 2017, including the impact of the Lucky Friday strike, on silver and gold production, silver equivalent production, cash cost and AISC, after by-product credits, capital expenditures and pre-development and exploration expenditures (which assumes metal prices of gold at $1,225/oz., silver at $17.25/oz., zinc at $1.30/lb. and lead at $1.05/lb. and USD/CAD assumed to be $0.78, USD/MXN assumed to be $0.06); (iv) expectations regarding the development, growth and exploration potential of the Company’s projects; (v) expectations of adding reserves and resources; (vi) the possibility of increasing production due to accessing higher grade material and surface pits at Casa Berardi; (vii) possible strike extensions of veins at San Sebastian, potential for new discoveries, ability to begin underground mining by early 2018 and ability to extend mine life through 2020; and (viii) expectations of grade increases at depth at Lucky Friday. -
America's Natural Nuclear Bunkers
America’s Natural Nuclear Bunkers 1 America’s Natural Nuclear Bunkers Table of Contents Introduction ......................................................................................................... 10 Alabama .............................................................................................................. 12 Alabama Caves .................................................................................................. 13 Alabama Mines ................................................................................................. 16 Alabama Tunnels .............................................................................................. 16 Alaska ................................................................................................................. 18 Alaska Caves ..................................................................................................... 19 Alaska Mines ............................................................................................... 19 Arizona ............................................................................................................... 24 Arizona Caves ................................................................................................... 25 Arizona Mines ................................................................................................... 26 Arkansas ............................................................................................................ 28 Arkansas Caves ................................................................................................