On Conversion Coating Treatments to Replace Chromating for Al Alloys: Recent Developments and Possible Future Directions1 S

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

On Conversion Coating Treatments to Replace Chromating for Al Alloys: Recent Developments and Possible Future Directions1 S ISSN 10678212, Russian Journal of NonFerrous Metals, 2012, Vol. 53, No. 2, pp. 176–203. © Allerton Press, Inc., 2012. POWDER MATERIALS AND COATINGS On Conversion Coating Treatments to Replace Chromating for Al Alloys: Recent Developments and Possible Future Directions1 S. A. Kulinicha, b and A. S. Akhtara aDepartment of Chemistry, University of British Columbia, 2036 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z1 bGraduate School of Engineering, Osaka University, 21A12 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 5650871, Japan email: [email protected] Abstract—Anticorrosive protection of Al alloys still depends heavily on the use of chromates, which are widely and universally employed as chromate conversion coating and chromic acid anodising pretreatments. The replacement of chromate based treatments with more environmentally compliant processes and materi als has been identified as a high priority. The aim of this paper is to review the most recent developments in the application of common inorganic protection layers based on conversion coatings for Al alloys. The review lists and discusses the majority of conversion coatings, including those formed through anodisation, on Al alloys as potential replacements to the most widely used treatments based on chromate chemistry. Keywords: conversion coatings, aluminium alloys, anticorrosive protection, chromatefree coatings, surface microstructure. DOI: 10.3103/S1067821212020071 1 1. INTRODUCTION CrCCs [1–6, 10, 12]. Since their publication a num ber of new results have appeared in the literature. Aluminium, which is widely used as a structural Therefore, this paper describes main trends and recent material owing to its low cost, excellent strengthto reports on the corrosion protection of Al alloys by weight ratio and corrosion resistance, needs alloying means of conversion oxide layers (usually primer and to develop high strength, and this decreases the natural topcoat are applied on top of these layers), and covers corrosion resistance provided by its tenacious native a wide variety of conversion coatings. Based on the oxide layer [1–3]. The protection of Al alloys currently current knowledge, none of these conversion alterna depends heavily on the use of chromates. Chromic tives for CrCC are listed or suspected as carcinogens. acid anodising and chromate filming are widely Some recent trends in developing anodic conversion employed pretreatments, while SrCrO4 pigmented coatings on Al alloys are also mentioned. primers find almost universal application [4–6]. In the last few decades, chromate conversion coatings (CrCCs) have been the most common anticorrosive 2. ALUMINIUM ALLOYS treatments for Al alloys [1–3, 7–10]. Due to the tox AND CHROMATE CONVERSION COATINGS icity of Cr(VI), however, environmentally benign alternatives to CrCCs have been investigated exten 2.1. Aluminium Alloys and Their Microstructure sively [1–3, 6, 10–13]. Despite intense research activ Al is alloyed with various elements to improve spe ities on the subject in both industry and academia, no cific properties. Table 1 indicates examples of alloys equivalent substitute treatment has been found. The belonging to several “families” (mainly 2XXX, 6XXX main approaches that have been investigated as poten and 7XXX series) which find various applications. The tial replacements for CrCCs include conversionbased concentration of each alloying element is a function of technologies (based on oxyanion analogues to chro the properties required from a particular Al alloy. mates [3, 12, 14–18], rareearthbased inhibitors There are some discrepancies in the compositions pre [19–25] and anodising [1, 26–30]), solgel coatings sented from different reports on the same alloys which [31, 32], organosilanebased coatings [33, 34], coat can be explained by (i) different detection limits and ings based on conductive polymers [35–37] and accuracies of the analytical techniques used in differ even—to some extent—coatings deposited from ent works, (ii) probably some minor variations in the plasma [6]. chemical compositions of alloys provided by different During the last two decades, there have been sev suppliers. eral comprehensive reviews on replacements for Most of the recent research on inhibition and protec tion has been carried out in the context of AA 2024T3 1 The article is published in the original. aluminium alloy [8, 16, 38–40, 55–60], which is the 176 ON CONVERSION COATING TREATMENTS TO REPLACE CHROMATING 177 Table 1. Chemical composition (wt %) of several typical aluminium alloys according to different reports (Al being always the balance element) Refer Alloy Cu Mg Si Mn Cr Zn Fe Ti ences AA2024T3 3.8–4.9 1.2–1.8 0.5 0.3–0.9 0.1 0.25 0.5 0.15 [38] 4.4 1.5 0.5 0.6 – – <0.5 – [39] 4.47 1.42 0.07 0.61 <0.01 0.11 0.16 0.03 [40]a AA7075T6 1.4 1.1 1.0 – 0.2 5.9 – – [41]a 1.78 2.91 0.03 0.02 0.21 5.6 0.25 0.04 [40]a AA6061T6 0.2–0.6 0.5–0.9 0.5–0.9 0.2 – – – – [42] 0.35 0.95 0.5 0.15 0.15 0.25 0.7 0.15 [43] AA3003H14 0.05–0.2 0.05 0.6 1.0–1.5 0.05 0.1 0.7 0.05 [44–46]a 0.12 0.017 0.18 1.05 0.002 0.012 0.52 0.009 [47] AA2014T6 3.9–5.0 0.2–0.8 0.5–1.2 0.4–1.2 <0.1 – <0.7 – [25] AA6082T6 0.1 0.6–1.2 0.7–1.3 0.4–1.0 0.25 0.2 0.5 0.1 [48] AA6016T4 0.07 0.33 1.3 0.07 0.03 0.02 0.2 – [49] AA6060T5 0.0031 0.499 0.396 0.018 – – 0.175 – [50]a AA7050T7 2.14 2.0 – – – 6.26 – – [51] AA2618T6 2.3 1.6 0.18 – – – 1.1 0.07 [52] AA5005H12 0.05 0.95 0.4 0.1 – 0.1 0.6 0.1 [53] AA5052H32 0.1 2.2–2.8 0.25 0.1 0.15–0.35 0.1 0.4 – [54] AA10504––0.3–––0.4– [46]a Note: a Other elements were also detected at lower levels. main alloy used in aircraft fuselage structures. It is also particles are usually noble with respect to the sur highly prone to corrosion [10, 55–60]. It is therefore rounding alloy matrix (Fig. 1c) and tend to localize not surprising that CrCCs have been developed and corrosion to the matrix phase at the particle periphery studied in detail on this alloy (referred to hereafter as on exposure to any aggressive aqueous environment 2024Al) [7–9, 57–67]. Below we briefly describe [9,38]. Meanwhile, the Al–Cu–Mg particles (Fig. 1a) some mechanisms of CrCC growth on the microstruc are thought to be initially active with respect to the ture of 2024Al. In principle, this knowledge can be matrix phase, which results in particle dealloying and generalized onto all Al alloys. In each particular alloy Cu enrichment [9, 10, 55, 66]. For instance, the parti different compositions, concentrations and combina cle in Fig. 1a appears to be partially dealloyed after tions of intermetallic secondphase particles are found, contact with water during polishing. Later on, being which implies local differences in corrosion behaviour ennobled, such particles were reported to switch their and in the formation of conversion coatings. galvanic relationship with the matrix region [9, 66]. Thus, the 2024Al surface is not chemically homoge The secondphase particles in 2024Al vary in size neous, leading to enhanced reactivity and corrosion of (most are in the range 0.1 μm to a few tens of μm in the alloy in the presence of water and electrolytes. diameter) and composition [38, 55, 60–63, 66, 67]. Recently the formation of conversion coatings in the These secondphase particles are enriched in the vari vicinity of such intermetallic particles has been studied ous alloying elements (see Table 1) and are formed with special attention [9, 16, 39, 60, 63, 66]. during the original solidification of the cast billet; and there is no significant dissolution during subsequent processing. The predominant chemical types are 2.2. Chromate Based Corrosive Protection Al2CuMg (also referred to as Sphase) and Al6(Cu, Fe, Mn), presented in Figs. 1a, 1b [38, 55, 60, 63, 66]. The term “conversion coating,” as used in the According to Buchheit et al. [55], the abovemen metal finishing industry, refers to the conversion of a tioned Al–Cu–Mg (Sphase) and Al–Cu–Fe–Mn metal’s surface into a material that will more easily particles make up 61.3 and 12.3 number % of all parti accept applied primer and/or paint and offers corro cles on the surface of 2024Al, the others being sion resistance in the event that the covering layer is Al7Cu2Fe (5.2%), (Al,Cu)6Mn (4.3%) and particles of damaged. Conversion coatings are rather thin (nor undetermined composition (16.9%). Most of these mally less than 600 nm on Al), quickly and easily RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF NONFERROUS METALS Vol. 53 No. 2 2012 178 KULINICH, AKHTAR (a) (b) (c) Fig. 1. SEM micrographs showing major surface features of polished 2024Al alloy, (a) Al–Cu–Mg and (b) Al–Cu–Fe–Mn sec ondphase particles; (c) alloy matrix region. Scale bars indicate 2 µm. formed, easily scratched and, if used to enhance paint cipal provider of corrosion protection. Paint (the top adhesion, are coated shortly after being formed to pre layer) is applied for decorative purposes and is also the vent degradation of the conversion coating. A typical main barrier against environmental influences [11, 68]. coating system on Al alloy is shown in Fig. 2.
Recommended publications
  • Chromate Conversion Coating and Alternatives As Corrosion-Resistant Treatments for Metal Parts
    Chromate conversion coating and alternatives as corrosion-resistant treatments for metal parts Isaac Omari, Johanne Penafiel and J. Scott McIndoe* Department of Chemistry, University of Victoria, PO Box 1700 STN CSC, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada. Fax: +1 (250) 721-7147; Tel: +1 (250) 721-7181; E-mail: [email protected] Table of Contents Chromate conversion coating and alternatives as corrosion-resistant treatments for metal parts.......................................................................................................................................1 1.0 Introduction...................................................................................................................2 1.1 Disadvantages of hexavalent CCCs..........................................................................2 1.2 Hexavalent CCC alternatives.....................................................................................3 2.0 Experimental design......................................................................................................5 2.1 Chromate conversion process...................................................................................5 2.2 Chromic acid bath evaluation....................................................................................5 2.3 Corrosion test............................................................................................................6 2.4 Reduction of hexavalent chromium to trivalent chromium prior to disposal................6 2.5 Zinc plating procedure...............................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Surface Engineering for Corrosion and Wear Resistance
    © 2001 ASM International. All Rights Reserved. www.asminternational.org Surface Engineering for Corrosion and Wear Resistance (#06835G) CHAPTER 1 Introduction to Surface Engineering for Corrosion and Wear Resistance SURFACE ENGINEERING is a multidisciplinary activity intended to tailor the properties of the surfaces of engineering components so that their function and serviceability can be improved. The ASM Handbook de- fines surface engineering as “treatment of the surface and near-surface regions of a material to allow the surface to perform functions that are distinct from those functions demanded from the bulk of the material” (Ref 1). The desired properties or characteristics of surface-engineered components include: • Improved corrosion resistance through barrier or sacrificial protection • Improved oxidation and/or sulfidation resistance • Improved wear resistance • Reduced frictional energy losses • Improved mechanical properties, for example, enhanced fatigue or toughness • Improved electronic or electrical properties • Improved thermal insulation • Improved aesthetic appearance As indicated in Table 1, these properties can be enhanced metallurgically, mechanically, chemically, or by adding a coating. The bulk of the material or substrate cannot be considered totally inde- pendent of the surface treatment. Most surface processes are not limited to the immediate region of the surface, but can involve the substrate by © 2001 ASM International. All Rights Reserved. www.asminternational.org Surface Engineering for Corrosion and Wear
    [Show full text]
  • Phosphate Conversion Coating Composition and Process
    Europa,schesP_ MM M II M Mill I M Ml M M M I II J European Patent Office ***** Att nt © Publication number: 0 610 421 B1 Office europeen- desj brevets^ . © EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION © Date of publication of patent specification: 27.12.95 © Int. CI.6: C23C 22/36, C23C 22/44 © Application number: 92924113.1 @ Date of filing: 28.10.92 © International application number: PCT/US92/08982 © International publication number: WO 93/09266 (13.05.93 93/12) &) PHOSPHATE CONVERSION COATING COMPOSITION AND PROCESS ® Priority: 01.11.91 US 786694 (73) Proprietor: HENKEL CORPORATION 140 Germantown Avenue, @ Date of publication of application: Suite 150 17.08.94 Bulletin 94/33 Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462 (US) © Publication of the grant of the patent: @ Inventor: BOULOS, Mervet Saleh 27.12.95 Bulletin 95/52 4395 Stonehenge Court Troy, Ml 48098 (US) © Designated Contracting States: AT BE DE DK ES FR GB IT NL SE © Representative: Jonsson, Hans-Peter, Dr. et al References cited: Patentanwalte EP-A- 0 015 020 EP-A- 0 287 133 von Krelsler Seltlng Werner, EP-A- 0 361 375 EP-A- 0 448 130 Bahnhofsvorplatz 1 (Delchmannhaus) EP-A- 0 454 361 FR-A- 2 347 459 D-50667 Koln (DE) 00 CO Note: Within nine months from the publication of the mention of the grant of the European patent, any person may give notice to the European Patent Office of opposition to the European patent granted. Notice of opposition shall be filed in a written reasoned statement. It shall not be deemed to have been filed until the opposition fee has been paid (Art.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Finishing Treatments
    Tel.: 1-800-479-0056 Fax: 1-888-411-2841 www.aspenfasteners.com [email protected] Surface finishing treatments Surface finishing treatments can have a significant impact on the properties of fasteners, making them more suitable for specific applications. Most typically finishes are applied to improve durability (wear resistance and corrosion resistance) and/or for decorative purposes. Fasteners that are to be used in conditions where they are exposed to high physical stress levels, corrosive elements, or extreme temperatures may benefit greatly from plating/coating. Anodizing An electrolytic passivation process that forms a thin, transparent oxide layer that protects the metal substrate. Anodizing modifies the surface of the metal to produce a decorative, durable, corrosion and wear resistant finish. Unlike plating or painting, the oxide finish becomes integrated with the metallic substrate, so it cannot chip or peel and minimally alters the dimensional aspects of the part. The physical properties of this oxide layer also provides excellent adhesion for secondary processes like colouring and sealing. The term "anodizing" reflects the process whereby the metal part to be finished forms the anode of an electric circuit immersed in an electrolyte bath. The current in the circuit causes ionic oxygen to be released from the electrolyte and combine with the metallic substrate of the finished part. Black Oxide Black Oxide is a low cost conversion coating where oxidizing salts are used to react with the iron in steel alloys to form magnetite (Fe304), the black oxide of iron. The result is an attractive and durable matte black finish. While steel is the usual substrate, other materials including stainless steel, alloy, copper, brass, bronze, die cast zinc, and cast iron react equally well.
    [Show full text]
  • Formation Mechanism and Properties of Fluoride–Phosphate Conversion
    RSC Advances View Article Online PAPER View Journal | View Issue Formation mechanism and properties of fluoride– phosphate conversion coating on titanium alloy Cite this: RSC Adv.,2017,7,16078 Shuaixing Wang,*a Xiaohui Liu,a Liqiang Wang,b Qingjie Wen,b Nan Dua and Jianhang Huanga A uniform grey conversion coating with the thickness of 4–5 mm was prepared on titanium alloy by a fluoride–phosphate treatment. Scratch testing results indicated that the conversion coating greatly improved the adhesion strength of the paint coat to the titanium substrate. The growth mechanism of the conversion coating was analyzed comprehensively by E–t curve, SEM, EDS, XPS and XRD. In the conversion process, the titanium substrate was first dissolved (0–45 s), then Na3TiF6 nucleation occurred via a series of reactions (45–120 s), whereby the conversion coating grew steadily with the nucleation Received 23rd November 2016 and growth of Na TiF grains (120–600 s); after 600 s, the conversion coating reached dynamic Accepted 28th February 2017 3 6 equilibrium of growth/dissolution. In the drying process at 100 Æ 5 C, some Na3TiF6 grains reacted with DOI: 10.1039/c6ra27199e O2 to form Na3TiOF5. The components of the conversion coating were Na3TiF6,Na3TiOF5, a little TiO2, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence. rsc.li/rsc-advances TiF4 and phosphate derivatives. 1. Introduction phytic acid (PA) treatment17 and Zr/Ti-based treatment18–20 may also be used for the pretreatment of titanium alloy. In general, Titanium and its alloys are increasingly
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Chemical Conversion Coatings for the Protection of Aluminium Alloys
    ESA STM-276 February 2008 Assessment of Chemical Conversion Coatings for the Protection of Aluminium Alloys A Comparison of Alodine 1200 with Chromium-Free Conversion Coatings A.M. Pereira, G. Pimenta Instituto de Soldadura e Oualidade (ISO), Oeiras, Portugal B.D. Dunn Product Assurance and Safety Department, ESA/ESTEC, The Netherlands 'uropean Spate Agenty Agenle spatiale europeenne 2 ESA STM-276 Publication: Assessment of Chemical Conversion Coatings for the Protection of Aluminium Alloys (ESA STM-276, February 2008) Editor: K. Fletcher Published and distributed by: ESA Communication Production Office ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands Tel: +31 71 565-3408 Fax: +31 71 5655433 Printed in: The Netherlands Price: €20 ISBN: 978-92-9221-897-2 ISSN: 0379-4067 Copyright: (Q2008 European Space Agency ESA STM-276 3 Contents Introduction 5 1.1 Project Background and Objectives 5 1.2 State of the art 6 1.2.1 Commercially Available Chemical Conversion Coatings ... 6 1.2.2 Review of Published Papers 9 2 ExperimentalPhase ... 17 2.1 Materials, preparation of specimens, and treatments 17 2.2 Evaluation of the aluminium alloys samples 17 2.2.1 Surface roughness 17 2.2.2 Surface electrical resistivity 18 2.2.3 Thermal cycling tests 18 2.2.4 Salt spray tests ... ... 18 2.2.5 Scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (SEM/EDS) 19 2.2.6 Chemical conversion coatings procedure 19 3 Results / Discussion... 21 3.1 Visual inspection 21 3.1.1 'As received' ... 21 3.1.2 'As produced' 21 3.1.3 After thermal cycling tests 21 3.1.4 After salt spray tests 21 3.1.5 After thermalcycling+ salt spraytests , 21 3.2 Surface roughness.
    [Show full text]
  • CORROSION PROTECTION PROVIDED by TRIVALENT CHROMIUM PROCESS CONVERSION COATINGS on ALUMINUM ALLOYS By
    CORROSION PROTECTION PROVIDED BY TRIVALENT CHROMIUM PROCESS CONVERSION COATINGS ON ALUMINUM ALLOYS By Liangliang Li A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Chemical Engineering – Doctor of Philosophy 2013 ABSTRACT CORROSION PROTECTION PROVIDED BY TRIVALENT CHROMIUM PROCESS CONVERSION COATINGS ON ALUMINUM ALLOYS By Liangliang Li High strength aluminum alloys are widely used in aviation and aerospace industries because of their desirable strength/weight ratio that results from the alloy addition ( e.g. , Cu, Fe etc ). However, this alloy addition causes pitting corrosion of the aluminum surrounding those intermetallic inclusions. One efficient way to inhibit the corrosion is through the protective coating system that contains the topcoat, primer, and conversion coating. The conversion coating is in direct contact with the alloy surface and is expected to provide both good corrosion protection and adhesion. The chromate conversion coating (CCC) has been widely used in aviation/aerospace industry and provides excellent active corrosion protection and adhesion to aluminum alloys. Unfortunately, the Cr(VI) is toxic and chromate is a carcinogen. Therefore, a trivalent chromium process (TCP) coating was developed as a drop-in replacement of CCC. This dissertation focuses on a fundamental understanding of the formation mechanism, chemical structure, and basic electrochemical properties of the TCP coating on three high strength aluminum alloys: AA2024-T3, AA6061-T6, and AA7075- T6. The formation of the TCP coating is driven by an increase in the interfacial pH. The coating is about 50-100 nm thick and has a biphasic structure consisting of a 3- ZrO 2/Cr(OH) 3 top layer and an AlF 6 /Al(OH) 3 interfacial layer.
    [Show full text]
  • Ti-Based Conversion Coating for the Corrosion Protection of Electrogalvanized Steel
    a *8 *9 */01- . - / w"#$ - 9 TI-BASED CONVERSION COATING FOR THE CORROSION PROTECTION OF ELECTROGALVANIZED STEEL Aleksey ABRASHOV 1, Nelya RI ORIAN 2, Tigran VA RAMIAN 3, Vladimir MEN‘SHIKOV 4, Anastasiya KOSTIUK 5 1MUCT, - D.Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology of ,ussia, Moscow, ,ussian 1ederation 1abr-ale [email protected], [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected], 5nasten [email protected] Abstract 2rocess 0as de.eloped for free-chromate passi.ation of 4inc coatings. An optimal composition of the solution 0as de.eloped. It 0as sho0n that titanium-based passi.ating coatings on the electrogal.ani4ed steel articles compare 0ell in corrosion resistance and protecting capacity 0ith iridescent chromate coatings. It 0as re.ealed that, unlike chromate coatings, the de.eloped titanium-based coatings 0ithstand the thermal shock 0ithout degrading of characteristics. Keyw rds: Corrosion protection, con.ersion coatings, Ti-based coatings, chromate-free passi.ation 1. INTRODUCTION To impro.e the corrosion resistance of gal.anic 4inc and cadmium protecti.e coatings, as 0ell as aluminum surfaces, chromate processes are applied. 2rotecti.e chromate films inhibit corrosion processes on the surfaces of these metals and, besides, ha.e the ability to self-heal in case of mechanical .iolations of the integrity of the film 91:. Unfortunately, chromate solutions are .ery to6ic because of the constituent ions of he6a.alent chromium. The problem of replacing the chromating processes became more acute after the adoption of the European Directi.e 20003533EC in 2000 limiting the presence of Cr 7VI8 compounds in con.ersion coatings 92:, and in 2002 the additions to the directi.e, 0hich completely prohibits the presence of Cr 7VI8 in con.ersion coatings applied to parts of cars from July, 2007 93:.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Pre-Treatment on Corrosion Resistance of Chromate Conversion Coated and Anodized Aa2219 Alloy
    Trans. Indian Inst. Met. TP 1881 Vol.57, No. 2, April 2004, pp. 133-140 EFFECT OF PRE-TREATMENT ON CORROSION RESISTANCE OF CHROMATE CONVERSION COATED AND ANODIZED AA2219 ALLOY K.Srinivasa Rao1, N.Sreedhar2, B.Madhusudana Rao2 and K.Prasad Rao1 1Dept.of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, I.I.T. Madras, Chennai-600036 2Defence Research and Development Laboratory, Hyderabad-500058 (Received 10 December 2003 ; in revised form 6 February 2004) ABSTRACT The study pertains to the effect of prior surface copper removal treatment on the corrosion resistance of chromate conversion coated(CCC) and anodized AA2219 Aluminium-copper alloy. Pre-treatment of test samples was done using AC Polarization in nitric acid to remove the copper rich precipitates from the surface. Pitting resistance of the base metal with and without copper rich phase was evaluated by potentiodynamic polarization test and transmission electron microscopy. Significant improvement in pitting resistance of base metal(T6) was observed after the copper removal. Two layers of organic coatings have been given on chromate conversion coated and normal anodized base metal with and without the copper removal. Zinc rich self etching and strontium chromate based primers are used as under coats. Epoxy based alkyd and polyurethane based finish coats have been used as topcoats. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy has been used to evaluate the corrosion resistance of the coated surfaces. It has been found that CCC is more effective after the copper removal treatment. Lower corrosion resistance of CCC on base metal without copper removal may be attributed to the heterogeneous microstructure and partial covering of CCC on the intermetallic compounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Metal Finishing Processes
    Metal Finishing Processes Table of Contents Plating or Conversion Coatings 4 Overview of plating or conversion coating ................................................................................................ 4 Typical steps associated with both plating and conversion coating ......................................................... 4 Solution Recovery ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Methods of plating solution recovery from rinses .................................................................................... 6 Metal recovery from rinses ....................................................................................................................... 7 Plating or Conversion Coatings with Anodizing as a Special Case 9 Overview of Anodizing ............................................................................................................................... 9 Typical steps associated with anodizing .................................................................................................... 9 Dyeing ...................................................................................................................................................... 10 Sealing ...................................................................................................................................................... 11 Solution recovery ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Henkel Surface Treatment Selector Guide Interactive Brochure Scroll Through and Click on the Underlined IDH Number of the Product to Go to the Product Detail Page
    Redline® : Opt + 2 Industrial Solutions Henkel Surface Treatment Selector Guide Interactive Brochure Scroll through and click on the underlined IDH number of the product to go to the product detail page. Can’t find what your looking for? then click here to do a product search. www.henkelna.com/industrial | 1 At Henkel Corporation, we provide solutions to industry’s biggest challenges. We are dedicated to understanding the markets we serve This selector guide will aid you in choosing the right solution and product for a wide range of common industrial challenges. For additional and developing partnerships that stand the test of time. information on Henkel products, please contact us at 1.800.562.8483. For more than 100 years, Henkel has been the leading supplier of state-of-the-art metal pretreatment technologies. As the world’s leading supplier of chemical pretreatments for light metals, plastics and steel, Henkel sets high standards for corrosion protection, TABLE OF CONTENTS paint adhesion and environmental safety. PREFERRED PRODUCTS AND PROCESSES To help you compete in today’s challenging manufacturing environment, our chemists and engineers work in partnership with our Preferred Alkaline Cleaners .........................................................................................................................................2-3 customers to improve design, assembly, productivity and profitability. Whether you need consultation on our products’ performance or a turnkey process design, Henkel provides solutions. Nanoceramics Process
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Multi-Functional Conversion Coatings by Inorganic Polymer for Electrical Appliances
    JFE TECHNICAL REPORT No. 24 (Mar. 2019) Development of Multi-functional Conversion Coatings by Inorganic Polymer for Electrical Appliances TSUCHIMOTO Kazuaki*1 MATSUDA Takeshi*2 MATSUZAKI Akira*3 Abstract: that make up the box is inadequate, connections are As electrogalvanized steel sheets, EG, for electrical made via nickel gaskets or other conductive materials appliances, multi-functional conversion coatings were in some cases. In order to reduce manufacturing costs developed in order to meet recent requirements for addi- by omitting these conductive materials, there is a high tional as well as and higher functions to enable manufac- need for steel sheets with both high corrosion resistance turers to use EG with fewer processes. This conversion and conductivity. In the press forming process, high coatings achieved high corrosion resistance and high lubricity that enables use without oil coating and does conductivity by applying “eNanoTM coat” *4 technology. not cause cracking or galling during forming is The “eNano coat” has two film formation concepts. required so that the oiling and degreasing processes can First is using a neutral treatment solution to maintain be omitted. Moreover, an anti-fingerprint property is conductive points by preventing dissolution of the convex also necessary for easy handling by users and excellent parts of zinc crystals. Second is high barrier layer by appearance of final products. inorganic polymer with a thin film. Furthermore, JFE Figure 1 shows the relationship between the corro- Steel has commercialized multi-functional conversion sion resistance and electrical conductivity of conven- treated steel sheets with a high anti-fingerprint property, tional chromate-free coatings.
    [Show full text]