Financing Module (Incl
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION Development of Business Cases for FCH Applications for Regions and Cities 2nd General Assembly Meeting Brussels, 11 July 2017 2nd General Assembly Meeting, 11 July 2017 in Brussels Agenda Topic Presenter Time A. Welcome coffee and registration - 09:30 – 10:00 B. General introduction, "State of the Union" FCH2 JU, RB 10:00 – 10:15 C. Results of the self-assessment survey of regions/cities RB 10:15 – 11:00 Coffee break 11:00 – 11:30 Draft D. Introduction to the funding/financing module (incl. case study) RB 11:30 – 12:30 Lunch break 12:30 – 13:30 E. Technology introduction forum – FCH "Mini-Fair" RB, FCH industry 13:30 – 14:45 Coffee break 14:45 – 15:00 F. Framework for the preliminary business case analyses RB 15:00 – 15:45 G. Conclusion and next steps FCH2 JU, RB 15:45 – 16:00 H. Networking drinks / get-together - from 16:00 on Source: FC2 JU, Roland Berger 2 Draft A. Welcome and objectives for today 4 Today, we'd like to bring cities/regions and FCH industry together and lay the foundations for the preliminary business cases Today's objectives Updates … Presentation and discussion of the self- assessment results, Draft Connections … Interim conclusion of the Tech Intro and introduction Possibility to network to the Funding Database and get together throughout the day H2 particularly the "mini- H2 fair" to interact with Progress …. industry Presentation and discussion of the framework to assess H 2 preliminary business H2 cases H2 Source: FCH2 JU, Roland Berger 5 Draft B. General introduction, "State of the Union" 6 80+ regions from 20+ countries now participate in the project – and the coalition keeps on growing Belgium Norway Sweden Germany > Flanders > Akershus > Gavleborg > Baden-Württemberg > North Rhine- > Pom West-Vlaanderen > Møre og Romsdal > Mariestad > Bremerhaven Westphalia > Oppland County Municipal > Hamburg > Northern Ruhr Iceland > Sogn og Fjordane Finland > HyCologne- area > Reykjavik > Kokkola Hydrogen Region > Heide region Rhineland > HYPOS (East United Kingdom Nether- > Kreis Steinfurt Germany) > Swindon and > London (Greater lands Denmark > Ilm-Kreis > Saxony-Anhalt Wiltshire London Authority) > Assen > Guldborsund > Aberdeen > Newcastle > Brabant > Lolland Czech Republic > Birmingham > Orkney Islands > Emmen > Skive > Trutnov > Cornwal > Oxfordshire > Groningen > Dundeel > Manchester Estonia > Fife region > Tees Valley > Tallin Slovenia > Velenje Draft > Leeds France Latvia > Auvergne Rhone-Alpes > Riga Croatia > Auxerre > Split > Bourgogne-Franche-Comté > Split-Dalmatia > Centre-Val de Loire County > Grenoble > Grand Dole Romania > La Roche sur Yon > Constanta > Normandie > Nouvelle-Aquitaine > Occitanie-Phyrenees Bulgaria > Orléans > Bulgarian Ports > Pays de la Loire > Sofia Spain > Aragon > Murcia Greece > Barcelona > Port of > Alimos > Heraklion > Cantabria Valencia > Agia Paraskevi> Western > Cartagena > Puertollano > Ierapetra Macedonia > Castilla – La > Valladolid > Kozani > Papagoou- Mancha Italy Austria > Milos Halargos Portugal > Lazio > Torino > Tirol > Vrilissia > Region of Crete > Torres Vedras > South Tyrol > Venice > Médio Tejo > Favignana > Toscana Source: FCH2 JU – as of 04 July 2017 7 30+ industry players (and counting) are now part of the project as well Current and prospective FCH industry participants Draft FCH Source: Roland Berger 8 9 The self-assessment survey has been completed, Tech Intro and funding/financing mapping are under way Project status – What we have achieved so far The coalition has been continuously growing to 80+ regions and cities from 20+ ✓ countries – now organized in 5 Working Groups 30+ industry partners (and counting) have been mobilized to support the coalition Draft ✓ ✓ 70+ self-assessments have been completed by cities and regions from 19 countries The Technology Introduction Dossiers are under way, 7 FCH applications ✓ have been discussed in the respective Working Groups already The funding and financing tools database has been designed and is now being ✓ populated, among others with >50 instruments identified in the self-assessment survey Source: Roland Berger 9 Moving forward, we will start the analysis of preliminary business cases of FCH applications Detailed project approach: two phases and eleven modules Phase 1: Preliminary business cases Phase 2: Detailed business cases, roadmaps 1 Regional "self- 2 Assessment of 3 Assessment of 7 Detailed 8 Concept 9 Roadmap 10 Engage- assessment" preliminary "fit" for regions/ business for maxi- and ment of survey as initial business cases cities (refined cases mizing implemen- local Draft market (generic) market (specific) use of tation plan stake- screening screening) funding holders Technology introduction for 4 Ranking of regions/ cities applications For H2 valleys ("Tier 1 regions/cities") For demonstration projects ("Tier 2") 5 Mapping funding/financing mechanisms 11 Dialog platform for technology development ("Tier 3") 6 Communication outreach/impact Modules currently under way Source: Roland Berger 10 Draft C. Results of the self- assessment survey of regions/cities 11 C The survey provides specific insights into the regions'/cities' current situation, ambitions and challenges for FCH deployment Key findings of the self-assessment survey Experience – 66% of the cities and regions have concrete plans or have already deployed FCH applications; the average experience level is equally distributed across Working Groups Objectives – Regarding this project, 64% of participants indicated a strong and concrete interest Draft towards deploying FCH applications, with 58% indicating strong interest in financing options Challenges – Funding & financing (57%) as well as viable business cases (42%) were stated as major challenges for the successful deployment of FCH applications Drivers – For 60-65%, the strongest drivers for pursuing FCH applications are industrial innov. & development and the creation of employment (slightly ahead of environmental reasons) Financing – Almost half of the participants have no dedicated internal FCH-budget available, but the aggregated, averaged 5-year FCH-related project volume is expected to increase by 163% to EUR 5.6 m between 2017 and 2022 Source: Roland Berger 12 Draft C.1 Introduction 13 C 1 Results of the self-assessment survey - Introduction The high participation in the self-assessment survey and the clear results underpin the pan-European interest in FCH deployment Key facts about the survey 74 completed, 84 partially completed surveys1)… …from 19 European countries… Draft comprising ca. 23% of European population… …covering ca. 14% of European surface… …with >94% of the participants indicating a moderate to strong interest in future deployment of FCH applications2) Countries with regions/cities that participated in the survey 1) All answered questions were included 2) Question: "How interested is your region/city in actively pursuing the future deployment of FCH applications?" (n=71), 94,37% of the participants set either 3, 4 or 5 points on a 5-point Likert Scale Source: FCH2 JU, Roland Berger 14 C 1 Results of the self-assessment survey - Introduction Survey participants state a strong interest in pursuing concrete FCH projects and exploring FCH financing options Reasons for participating in the project1) Totally disagree (1) Totally agree (5) Other reasons Ø 4.5 (selection): Develop/pursue specific FCH 26% 64% projects for my region/city "Communicate internally and Ø 4.4 increase buy-in across Better understand financing options 30% 58% departments within municipality" Draft for deploying FCH applications Ø 4.2 Contacts with other regions/cities 16% 28% 51% "Develop approaches to public acceptability" Ø 4.0 Contacts with the FCH industry 16% 34% 41% "Specify funding needs to be Ø 4.0 considered for future policies" Get to know & understand 11% 16% 33% 39% FCH technologies Ø 3.9 "Overview of Pro`s and Con`s of Define and create a H2 23% 20% 44% H2 compared to other energy valley and/or ecosystem carriers" Totally disagree (1) 2 3 4 Totally agree (5) 1) Question: "Please evaluate the following reasons for participating in this project" (n=74-76) Source: FCH2 JU, Roland Berger 15 Draft C.2 Current set-up and starting point of regions/cities 16 C 2 Results of the self-assessment survey - Current set-up More than 80% of the regions & cities report ambitious quantitative targets for reduction of local emissions Emission reduction within regions and cities Question: "Does your political agenda Question: "Is there a concrete Concrete targets include reduction of local emissions quantitative target for reducing (selection)1) like GHG, pollutants and fine dust?" local emissions?" (n=69) (n=77) "100% electricity generation from renewables by 2050, 50% zero emission public transport by 2030, Draft I don’t know No I don’t know 100% by 2050" 8% 3% No 10% 7% "40% reduction in CO2 emissions by 2020 compared to 2005" 90% 83% "Replace petrol share in energy mix for mobility to 40% by 2050" Yes Yes "Reduce CO2 emissions to 4t p.p. by 2020, less than 1.5t by 2050" 1) Question: "Please specify one or more concrete targets." Source: FCH2 JU, Roland Berger 17 C 2 Results of the self-assessment survey - Current set-up The strongest drivers for pursuing FCH applications are industrial innovation & development as well as additional employment Reasons for pursuing FCH applications1) Totally disagree (1) Totally agree (5) Other reasons Foster industrial innovation (selection): 13% 21% 64% Ø 4.4 & development Create additional employment 25% 62% Ø 4.4 opportunities "Boost