DOCSLIB.ORG

Instructions and Dehinitions: FY2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Instructions and Dehinitions: FY2014 Instructions and Deinitions: FY2014 Table of Contents Introduction 2 Background 2 What’s New for the FY2014 Survey 2 FAQ 4 General Instructions 6 General Information 6 Section 1: Conservation Treatment 8 Section 2: Conservation Assessment, Digitization Preparation, Exhibit Preparation 9 Section 3: General Preservation Activities 10 Section 4: Reformatting and Digitization 10 Section 5: Digital Preservation and Digital Asset Management 13 Introduction Count what you do and show preservation counts! The Preservation Statistics Survey is an effort coordinated by the Preservation and Reformatting Section (PARS) of the American Library Association (ALA) and the Association of Library Collections and Technical Services (ALCTS). Any library or archives in the United States conducting preservation activities may complete this survey, which will be open from January 20, 2015 through February 27, 2015. The deadline has been extended to March 20, 2015. Questions focus on production-based preservation activities for /iscal year 2014, documenting your institution's conservation treatment, general preservation activities, preservation reformatting and digitization, and digital preservation and digital asset management activities. The goal of this survey is to document the state of preservation activities in this digital era via quantitative data that facilitates peer comparison and tracking changes in the preservation and conservation /ields over time. Background This survey is based on the Preservation Statistics survey program by the Association of Research Libraries (ARL) from 1984 to 2008. When the ARL Preservation Statistics program was discontinued in 2008, the Preservation and Reformatting Section of ALA / ALCTS, realizing the value of sharing preservation statistics, worked towards developing an improved and sustainable preservation statistics survey. An initial pilot survey was issued in 2012, and a second survey in 2013. The FY2012 and 2013 Preservation Statistics Survey data sets and reports are available at: http://www.ala.org/alcts/resources/preservation/presstats In 2014, the Preservation Statistics project received an ALCTS Presidential Citation in recognition for its contribution to the preservation profession. What’s New for the FY2014 Survey The FY2014 Preservation Statistics Survey is signiicantly shorter than the FY2013 and 2012 surveys. The FY2014 survey focuses on production statistics such as number of conservation treatments performed, the number of items reformatted, and the number of digital items preserved. In an effort to strike a balance between data that is easy for institutions to gather and data that is useful to the preservation community, questions about administration, staf/ing, and most general preservation activities are not included in the FY2014 Survey. Those issues will be surveyed in a supplementary survey in the future (likely FY2017). Some questions in the FY14 survey are marked as optional. These questions cover emerging preservation activities that may not be conducted in all institutions. Nonetheless, your responses to these questions provide valuable information about the evolving role of preservation in cultural heritage programs. If your institution tracks it, please share it. The data collected by the Preservation Statistics Survey survey is most meaningful if a representative number of libraries and archives consistently share their annual statistics. Given the effort required to manage this project and perform analysis that informs our /ield about current issues and ongoing trends, a W2 Instructions and De2initions: FY2014 goal of seventy-ive respondents has been set in order for the Preservation Statistics Survey project to continue and for the FY2015 Survey to be conducted. - - - - - - - - - - - Preview the survey questionnaire (.pdf) and use this Instructions and De/initions document (.pdf) to guide your responses. If helpful, utilize the Preservation Statistics worksheet (.xlsx) to organize and gather your data. Finally, visit the FY2014 Preservation Statistics Survey on SurveyMonkey to enter your responses: https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/preservationstatisticsFY14 Please send any questions or comments to survey coordinators Holly Robertson and Annie Peterson at [email protected]. For additional news and updates on the survey like Preservation Statistics on Facebook at www.facebook.com/preservationstatistics W3 Instructions and De2initions: FY2014 FAQ What is the scope of the survey? The FY2014 Preservation Statistics Survey requests data about: 1. Conservation treatment 2. Conservation assessment, digitization preparation, and exhibit preparation 3. General preservation activities 4. Reformatting and digitization 5. Digital preservation and digital asset management Who may participate in the survey? Any library or archives in the United States that conducts preservation activities may participate. If you are a smaller entity within a larger organization (for example: a law or health sciences library or a specialized archives within a larger university system), we encourage you to report separately to facilitate peer comparison to similar institutions. Why should you participate? Your participation facilitates the documentation and analysis of current library and archive preservation programs in the United States. This data is helpful in understanding the ever-evolving scope of preservation programs and the activities employed to preserve long-term access to library collections. Many institutions use this data to evaluate their preservation programming support and activities in the context of peer institutions, to promote long-term preservation planning, and to raise institutional awareness about collections care needs. What date range of activities should be reported? What is FY2014? Report preservation activities from Fiscal Year 2014 (FY2014). FY2014 is whatever period of time your institution de/ines as a /iscal year: if that’s from October to September, July to June, or by calendar year (January to December), that’s /ine. You’re reporting a year’s worth of activities. How long will the survey take to complete? How many questions are included? Short answer: it depends. If you participated in the FY2013 Preservation Survey, you will be familiar with all of the survey questions. The FY2014 survey is designed to take signi/icantly less time than the FY2013 survey. If your institution was a member of the Association of Research Libraries (ARL) and participated in their discontinued Preservation Survey program, you will recognize many questions, with a few additions to re/lect interest in capturing general preservation programming, preservation reformatting and digitization, and digital preservation data. Many institutions will have this data on ile for internal planning or reporting purposes. Others will not have statistics recorded for each activity, while others will simply not conduct every activity covered by this questionnaire. Can I start the survey online, save my responses, and return to it later? Don’t rely on it. Depending on your browser setup, SurveyMonkey may install a cookie that will allow you W4 Instructions and De2initions: FY2014 (if you return to the survey using the same computer and same browser, and if your browser does not dump cookies when you close a session) to re-open the survey. Rather, we recommend that you /irst download the survey questionnaire to collect data: http:// www.ala.org/alcts/sites/ala.org.alcts/iles/content/resources/preserv/presstats/FY2014/FY2014- PresStats-preview-ques.pdf And then visit the SurveyMonkey site when you are ready to input your data: https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/preservationstatisticsFY14 You can also use this worksheet to record your activities throughout the year: http://www.ala.org/alcts/sites/ala.org.alcts/iles/content/resources/preserv/presstats/FY2014/FY2014- PresStats-worksheet.xlsx May I enter footnotes into the survey? Yes: if you need to further clarify or explain any responses, at the end of each section there is a question with a textbox that allows you to enter any additional information. These notes will be published with the rest of the survey data. How will the responses be used? Individual responses will be shared so that libraries might examine their activities, planning, and needs in the context of their peers and so that preservation activities are documented for scholarship and study. Results data will be published online (much in the same way ARL made its Preservation Survey data available1) as a spreadsheet made available via a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license. Aggregate data may be used in infographics, presentations, and other analysis. The reports for the pilot FY2012 and 2013 Preservation Statistics Surveys are available at http://www.ala.org/alcts/resources/preservation/presstats Who sponsors this survey? This survey is an all-volunteer initiative of the Preservation Standards and Practices Committee of the Preservation and Reformatting Section (PARS) of the Association of Library Collections and Technical Services (ALCTS) of the American Library Association (ALA). If you have any questions about this survey, contact preservation coordinators Annie Peterson and Holly Robertson at [email protected]. When will the results be posted? The FY2014 Preservation Statistics Survey will be open from mid January through February 2015. Results and data should be posted in time for the American Library Association annual meeting in late June 2015. 1 http://old.arl.org/stats/annualsurveys/pres/
Load more

Recommended publications
  • International Preservation Issues Number Seven International Preservation Issues Number Seven
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM THE 3-D’SOFPRESERVATION DISATERS, DISPLAYS, DIGITIZATION ACTES DU SYMPOSIUM INTERNATIONAL LA CONSERVATION EN TROIS DIMENSIONS CATASTROPHES, EXPOSITIONS, NUMÉRISATION Organisé par la Bibliothèque nationale de France avec la collaboration de l’IFLA Paris, 8-10 mars 2006 Ed. revised and updated by / Ed. revue et corrigée par Corine Koch, IFLA-PAC International Preservation Issues Number Seven International Preservation Issues Number Seven International Preservation Issues (IPI) is an IFLA-PAC (Preservation and Conservation) series that intends to complement PAC’s newsletter, International Preservation News (IPN) with reports on major preservation issues. IFLA-PAC Bibliothèque nationale de France Quai François-Mauriac 75706 Paris cedex 13 France Tél : + 33 (0) 1 53 79 59 70 Fax : + 33 (0) 1 53 79 59 80 e-mail: [email protected] IFLA-PAC Director e-mail: [email protected] Programme Officer ISBN-10 2-912 743-05-2 ISBN-13 978-2-912 743-05-3 ISSN 1562-305X Published 2006 by the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) Core Activity on Preservation and Conservation (PAC). ∞ This publication is printed on permanent paper which meets the requirements of ISO standard: ISO 9706:1994 – Information and Documentation – Paper for Documents – Requirements for Permanence. © Copyright 2006 by IFLA-PAC. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transcribed in any form without permission of the publishers. Request for reproduction for non-commercial purposes, including
    [Show full text]
  • Analog, the Sequel: an Analysis of Current Film Archiving Practice and Hesitance to Embrace Digital Preservation by Suzanna Conrad
    ANALOG, THE SEQUEL: AN ANALYSIS OF CURRENT FILM ARCHIVING PRACTICE AND HESITANCE TO EMBRACE DIGITAL PRESERVATION BY SUZANNA CONRAD ABSTRACT: Film archives preserve materials of significant cultural heritage. While current practice helps ensure 35mm film will last for at least one hundred years, digi- tal technology is creating new challenges for the traditional means of preservation. Digitally produced films can be preserved via film stock; however, digital ancillary materials and assets in many cases cannot be preserved using traditional analog means. Strategy and action for preserving this content needs to be addressed before further content is lost. To understand the current perspective of the film archives, especially in regards to the film industry’s marked hesitation to embrace digital preservation, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences’ paper “The Digital Dilemma: Strategic Issues in Archiving and Accessing Digital Motion Picture Materials” was closely evaluated. To supplement this analysis, an interview was conducted with the collections curator at the Academy Film Archive, who explained the archives’ current approach to curation and its hesitation to move to digital technologies for preservation. Introduction Moving images are a vital part of our cultural heritage. The music, film, and broadcasting industries, as well as academic and cultural institutions, have amassed a “legacy of primary source materials” of immense value. These sources make the last one hundred years understandable as an era of the “media of the modernity.”1 Motion pictures and films were established as vital archival records as early as the 1930s with the National Archives Act, which included motion pictures in the definition of “objects of archival interest.”2 As cultural artifacts, moving images deserve archival care and preservation.3 However, the art of preserving moving images and film can at times be daunting.
    [Show full text]
  • Content Preservation and Digitization of Maps Housed in the KU Natural History Museum Division of Archaeology: an Analysis of Op
    1 Content Preservation and Digitization of Maps Housed in the KU Natural History Museum Division of Archaeology: An Analysis of Opportunities and Obstacles By Ross Kerr A study presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Museum Studies The University of Kansas April 27 2017 *Address for correspondence: [email protected] *With special thanks to Dr. Sandra Olsen, Dr. Peter Welsh, and Mr. Steve Nowak for serving on my committee and overseeing my research. 2 Abstract The purpose of this research is to explain the obstacles museums face in preserving map collections, as well as the steps museums can take to overcome these obstacles. The research begins with a brief history of paper conservation of maps in museums and libraries, and digitization of maps. Next, there is an explanation of the theoretical framework/approach that is used in this project. Following that is a presentation of a SWOT analysis of the archaeological map collection held by the KU Biodiversity Institute & Natural History Museum. The first two components of the SWOT analysis, strengths and weaknesses, focus on advantages and shortcomings of the collection in its current state. The last two components, opportunities and threats, focus respectively on the benefits that can be expected from preserving the map collection, and the obstacles that may hinder process. Finally, the study outlines a procedure for preserving and digitizing the archaeological maps held by the KU Biodiversity Institute, in order to expand accessibility
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Preservation Handbook
    Digital Preservation Handbook Digital Preservation Briefing Illustrations by Jørgen Stamp digitalbevaring.dk CC BY 2.5 Denmark Who is it for? Senior administrators (DigCurV Executive Lens), operational managers (DigCurV Manager Lens) and staff (DigCurV Practitioner Lens) within repositories, funding agencies, creators and publishers, anyone requiring an introduction to the subject. Assumed level of knowledge Novice. Purpose To provide a strategic overview and senior management briefing, outlining the broad issues and the rationale for funding to be allocated to the tasks involved in preserving digital resources. To provide a synthesis of current thinking on digital preservation issues. To distinguish between the major categories of issues. To help clarify how various issues will impact on decisions at various stages of the life-cycle of digital materials. To provide a focus for further debate and discussion within organisations and with external audiences. Gold sponsor Silver sponsors Bronze sponsors Reusing this information You may re-use this material in English (not including logos) with required acknowledgements free of charge in any format or medium. See How to use the Handbook for full details of licences and acknowledgements for re-use. For permission for translation into other languages email: [email protected] Please use this form of citation for the Handbook: Digital Preservation Handbook, 2nd Edition, http://handbook.dpconline.org/, Digital Preservation Coalition © 2015. 2 Contents Why Digital Preservation Matters
    [Show full text]
  • Guidance for Digital Preservation Workflows Authors: Kevin Bolton, Jan Whalen and Rachel Bolton (Kevinjbolton Ltd)
    Guidance for Digital Preservation Workflows Authors: Kevin Bolton, Jan Whalen and Rachel Bolton (Kevinjbolton Ltd) This publication is licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/ Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to: [email protected]. 1 Introduction The guidance was commissioned by the Archive Sector Development department (ASD) of The National Archives (TNA). It aims to support archives in the United Kingdom to move into active digital preservation work by providing those who work with archives: Practical examples of workflows for managing born digital content, that you can change and use in your own organisation. Actions for how to process and preserve born digital content, including using free software. In this guidance, a workflow is a number of connected steps that need to be followed from start to finish in order to complete a process. You do not need a significant level of digital preservation knowledge in order to follow the guidance. Certain terminology is explained in the glossary. In the guidance we refer to “digital content” or “content” – this is what we hope to preserve. Digital preservation literature often calls this “digital objects”. The guidance will show you which steps are “Essential” and you may prefer to follow these steps only. It is better to do something, rather than nothing! We are not promoting a ‘one size fits all’ approach and expect archives to use and adapt the guidance depending on the needs of their organisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Metadata Requirements and Preparing Content for Digital Preservation
    METADATA REQUIREMENTS AND PREPARING CONTENT FOR DIGITAL PRESERVATION v1.7.0 This document forms part of the Ministry of Education and Culture’s Open science and digital cultural heritage entity Licence Creative Commons Finland CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) Users of this Specification are entitled to distribute the report, i.e. copy, circulate, display publicly and perform publicly the standard portfolio and modify it under the following conditions: . The MinistryThis document of Education forms and Culture part of is the appointed Ministry the of Original Education Author and (not, Culture’s however, so that notification would Openrefer to scien a licenseece and or digital means cultural by which heritage the Specification entity is used as supported by the licensor). The user is not entitled to use the Specification commercially. If the user makes any modifications to the Specification or uses it as the basis for their own works, the derivative work shall be distributed in the same manner or under the same type of licence. METADATA REQUIREMENTS AND PREPARING CONTENT FOR DIGITAL PRESERVATION – 1.7.0 CONTENT 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................. 4 1.1 Digital Preservation Services ............................................................................................................................. 4 1.2 Resource Description .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Preservation Plan Wheaton College Library and Archives Adopted June 14, 2019
    Digital Preservation Plan Wheaton College Library and Archives Adopted June 14, 2019 Digital Preservation Team Members: Sarah Stanley (chair), Special Collections, Buswell Library Katherine Graber, Billy Graham Center Archives Jeffrey Mudge, Buswell Library Laura Schmidt, Marion E. Wade Center Contents: Introduction…………………………………..................... 2 1. Goals and Objectives………………………………….. 2-3 2. Scope …………………………………………………… 3 3. Challenges …………………………………………….. 3-5 4. Criteria for Prioritizing Projects ………………………. 5-6 5. Projects to Prioritize …………………………………… 6-7 6. Institutional Commitments ……………………………. 8 7. Roles and Responsibilities …………………………… 8-9 8. Preservation and Quality Control ……………………. 9-12 9. Training and Education ……………………………….. 12 10. Evaluation and Updating ……………………………. 13 Appendices A: OAIS Reference Model ………………………………. 13 B: NDSA Levels of Preservation ……………………….. 14 C: Glossary of Terms …………………………………….. 15-16 D: Sources Consulted ……………………………………. 17-18 Digital Preservation Plan p.2 Digital Preservation Plan This plan was developed to preserve the digital resources of the library and archives of Wheaton College. Due to the rapid growth and significance of digital resources, it is imperative that a framework be established to ensure the authenticity, reliability and long-term availability of these materials. Participating Wheaton College repositories include the Billy Graham Center Archives (BGC Archives), the Marion E. Wade Center (Wade Center), and Buswell Library. Digital preservation ensures that current and future students, faculty, and scholars may access the library and archives’ digital resources for the long-term. Thus, this plan will provide strategies and action steps that comprise digital preservation in accordance with established best practices, and will also articulate a common understanding of such activities across campus repositories. The plan also describes the need for digital preservation, which requires more active management than traditional physical preservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Local Sparse Image Inpainting for Document Bleed-Through Removal
    Article Non-Local Sparse Image Inpainting for Document Bleed-Through Removal Muhammad Hanif * ID , Anna Tonazzini, Pasquale Savino and Emanuele Salerno ID Institute of Information Science and Technologies, Italian National Research Council, 56124 Pisa, Italy; [email protected] (A.T.); [email protected] (P.S.); [email protected] (E.S.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 14 January 2018; Accepted: 26 April 2018; Published: 9 May 2018 Abstract: Bleed-through is a frequent, pervasive degradation in ancient manuscripts, which is caused by ink seeped from the opposite side of the sheet. Bleed-through, appearing as an extra interfering text, hinders document readability and makes it difficult to decipher the information contents. Digital image restoration techniques have been successfully employed to remove or significantly reduce this distortion. This paper proposes a two-step restoration method for documents affected by bleed-through, exploiting information from the recto and verso images. First, the bleed-through pixels are identified, based on a non-stationary, linear model of the two texts overlapped in the recto-verso pair. In the second step, a dictionary learning-based sparse image inpainting technique, with non-local patch grouping, is used to reconstruct the bleed-through-contaminated image information. An overcomplete sparse dictionary is learned from the bleed-through-free image patches, which is then used to estimate a befitting fill-in for the identified bleed-through pixels. The non-local patch similarity is employed in the sparse reconstruction of each patch, to enforce the local similarity. Thanks to the intrinsic image sparsity and non-local patch similarity, the natural texture of the background is well reproduced in the bleed-through areas, and even a possible overestimation of the bleed through pixels is effectively corrected, so that the original appearance of the document is preserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Preservation Metadata (2Nd Edition)
    01000100 01010000 Preservation 01000011 Metadata 01000100 (2nd edition) 01010000 Brian Lavoie and Richard Gartner 01000011 01000100 DPC Technology Watch Report 13-03 May 2013 01010000 01000011 01000100 01010000 Series editors on behalf of the DPC 01000011 Charles Beagrie Ltd. Principal Investigator for the Series 01000100 Neil Beagrie 01010000 01000011DPC Technology Watch Series © Digital Preservation Coalition 2013 – and Richard Gartner and Brian Lavoie 2013 Published in association with Charles Beagrie Ltd. ISSN: ISSN 2048-7916 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7207/twr13-03 Second Edition All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing from the publisher. The moral rights of the authors have been asserted. First edition published in Great Britain in 2005 by the Digital Preservation Coalition. Second edition published in Great Britain in 2013 by the Digital Preservation Coalition. Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank series editor Neil Beagrie and our reviewers for many helpful comments and suggestions, which significantly improved the final version of this report. Foreword The Digital Preservation Coalition (DPC) is an advocate and catalyst for digital preservation, ensuring our members can deliver resilient long-term access to digital content and services. It is a not-for-profit membership organization whose primary objective is to raise awareness of the importance of the preservation of digital material and the attendant strategic, cultural and technological issues. It supports its members through knowledge exchange, capacity building, assurance, advocacy and partnership. The DPC’s vision is to make our digital memory accessible tomorrow.
    [Show full text]
  • Integration of Collections Management and Digital Preservation
    Integration of Collections Management and Digital Preservation Mark Evans – History Associates Curate Gear 2016, January 2016 Project Participants Client: • Trustees of Reservations Project Team: • History Associates • Preservica Key Objectives • Bring more of the ARC’s resources to an even wider audience than we currently reach through online access to our museum collections catalog • Offer enhanced internal access to institutional records, to aid staff in their roles as stewards and to contribute to future restoration efforts. • Use technology to preserve the records that document an incredible past so that they can inform and inspire far into the future. Primary Goals Implement a Digital Asset Management System to: Protect and share digital assets internally • Interoperability/ Integration with PastPerfect and other systems • Implement OAIS responsibilities Provide Online Collections Catalog • Significant step up from PastPefect public interface • Advance search and faceted browsing • Rendering of content • GPS and mapping features Desired Approach Other Information Management Systems Collections Management System Proposed Solution Preservica Core • Provide OAIS • Support Internal users • Accommodate multiple sources Preservica Enhancements • Ingest PastPerfect data Universal Access • Provide Public Access • Enhanced capabilities Key Challenges and Considerations Metadata Model • Past Perfect manages multiple catalogs with varying semantics • Consider Metadata from other sources – some not yet fully defined • Sufficient to support common access across all assets Automate as much as possible • Little to no internal IT support Past perfect has no API • Export pathways are very limited – may require custom scripts • New SIP definition Proposed Approach • Export content as XML where possible • Facilitates transformation to a Preservica SIP • Define a simple Past Perfect Package • Guided by what we can export and what we need.
    [Show full text]
  • Mellon Guide.Qxd
    THE FILM PRESERVATION GUIDE THE BASICS FOR ARCHIVES, LIBRARIES, AND MUSEUMS National Film Preservation Foundation San Francisco, California National Film Preservation Foundation 870 Market Street, Suite 1113 San Francisco, CA 94102 © 2004 by the National Film Preservation Foundation Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The film preservation guide : the basics for archives, libraries, and museums. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-9747099-0-5 (alk. paper) 1. Motion picture film—Preservation. I. National Film Preservation Foundation (U.S.) TR886.3F58 2003 778.5’8—dc22 2003024032 CIP This publication was made possible through a grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. It may be downloaded as a PDF file from the National Film Preservation Foundation Web site: www.filmpreservation.org. Credits Except as noted below, all photographs were provided by Barbara Galasso and the L. Jeffrey Selznick School of Film Preservation at George Eastman House. The following contributed illustrations and text material: American Museum of Natural History (94), Anonymous (67), California Pacific Medical Center (57), Chace Productions Inc. (12 center and right), Duke University (48 top), Estate of Edith Lutyens Bel Geddes and the Harry Ransom Humanities Research Center at the University of Texas at Austin (84), Florida Moving Image Archive (91), Image Permanence Institute at the Rochester Institute of Technology (10 top), Library of Congress (48 bottom, 51, 63, 87), Minnesota Historical Society (92), National Center for Jewish Film (90), Nebraska State Historical Society (69, 73, 74), Northeast Historic Film (back cover, 62 bottom, 76, 85), Oklahoma Historical Society (5), Pacific Film Archive at the University of California at Berkeley (back cover), Sabucat Productions (93), UCLA Film and Tele- vision Archive (86), University of Alaska Fairbanks (40), University of South Carolina Newsfilm Library (89), Visual Communications (58).
    [Show full text]
  • Preservation Management of Digital Materials: the Handbook
    Preservation Management of Digital Materials: The Handbook www.dpconline.org/graphics/handbook/ 5. Media and Formats 5. Outline Intended primary audience Operational managers and staff in repositories, publishers and other data creators, third party service providers. Assumed level of knowledge of digital preservation Novice to Intermediate. Purpose To outline the range of options available when creating digital materials and some of the major implications of selection.To point to more detailed sources of advice and guidance.To indicate areas where it is necessary to maintain an active technology watch. 5.1 Media It is important to have an understanding of the various media for storage because they require different software and hardware equipment for access, and have different storage conditions and preservation requirements.They also have varying suitability according to the storage capacity required, and preservation or access needed. Although it is very easy to focus on the traditional conservation of the physical artefact, it is important to recognise that most electronic media will be threatened by obsolescence of the hardware and software to access them.This often occurs long before deterioration of media (which have been subject to appropriate storage and handling) becomes a problem. However, appropriate selection, storage and handling of media is still essential to any preservation strategy (see Storage and Preservation). Obsolescence of previous storage media has occurred in rapid succession. In floppy disks alone we have seen a progression from 8 in to 5.25 in and then 3.5 in formats, with each change leading to rapid discontinuation of previous formats and difficulty in obtaining or maintaining access devices for them.
    [Show full text]