DOCSLIB.ORG

Kim Badin Humorous Impoliteness in the Big Bang Theory and Sherlock

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kim Badin Humorous Impoliteness in the Big Bang Theory and Sherlock Kim Badin Humorous Impoliteness in The Big Bang Theory and Sherlock: Conveying Humour with Offensive Language -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BADIN Kim. Humorous Impoliteness in The Big Bang Theory and Sherlock: Conveying Humour with Offensive Language, sous la direction de Lucile Bordet et Denis Jamet . - Lyon: Université Jean Moulin (Lyon 3), 2016. Mémoire soutenu le 01/06/2016. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Document diffusé sous le contrat Creative Commons « Paternité – pas d’utilisation commerciale - pas de modification » : vous êtes libre de le reproduire, de le distribuer et de le communiquer au public à condition d’en mentionner le nom de l’auteur et de ne pas le modifier, le transformer, l’adapter ni l’utiliser à des fins commerciales. Mémoire de Master 2 Etudes Anglophones Faculté des langues Kim BADIN Humorous Impoliteness in The Big Bang Theory and Sherlock: Conveying Humour with Offensive Language Mémoire dirigé par : Lucile BORDET Denis JAMET Année universitaire 2015-2016 Humorous Impoliteness in The Big Bang Theory and Sherlock: Conveying Humour with Offensive Language Kim BADIN Acknowledgements I would like to express my thanks to Lucile Bordet and Denis Jamet for their time and useful remarks and to Caroline Vaslin, Yoan Sechi and Pierre Mazzolini for proofreading some passages. Contents General introduction ......................................................................................................... 6 Part I: Theories of humour ............................................................................................ 10 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 11 1. What is humour? .......................................................................................................... 11 1.1 Humours ................................................................................................................. 12 1.2 How humour developed ......................................................................................... 13 1.3 Different types of humour ...................................................................................... 14 2. Henri Bergson and the mechanical theory ................................................................... 18 2.1 Bergson’s laws of laughter .................................................................................... 18 2.2 General theory and comedy of forms and gestures/movements ............................ 20 2.3 Situation and language-based comedy ................................................................... 22 2.4 Comedy of character .............................................................................................. 26 3. Incongruity theories ..................................................................................................... 28 3.1 Beattie, Kant and Schopenhauer ............................................................................ 28 3.2 Incongruity or incongruities? ................................................................................. 30 4. Other theories ............................................................................................................... 31 4.1 The superiority theory ............................................................................................ 31 4.2 The release theory .................................................................................................. 32 4.3 The Benign Violation Theory (BVT) .................................................................... 33 Conclusion ....................................................................................................................... 35 Part II: Theories of impoliteness ................................................................................. 36 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 37 1. Politeness theories ........................................................................................................ 37 1.1 Brown and Levinson’s politeness theory (1987) ................................................... 38 1.1.1 Positive and negative face ............................................................................... 38 1.1.2 Face-Threatening Acts (FTAs) ....................................................................... 39 1.1.3 The sociological variables .............................................................................. 39 1.1.4 Realisations of politeness strategies in language ............................................ 41 1.2 Watts’s theory of (im)politeness ............................................................................ 45 1.2.1 (im)politeness1 and (im)politeness2 ................................................................ 45 1.2.2 Politic behaviour and polite behaviour ........................................................... 46 1.2.3 Bourdieu’s habitus and Watts’s ‘emergent networks’ .................................... 47 2. Impoliteness as politeness’s ‘parasite’ (Culpeper 1996) ............................................. 49 2.1 Inherent impoliteness vs. mock impoliteness ........................................................ 49 2.2 Why are we impolite? ............................................................................................ 50 2.3 Brown and Levinson’s reversed model ................................................................. 51 3. Understanding impoliteness (Culpeper 2011) ............................................................. 53 3.1 Face, social norms and sociality rights .................................................................. 54 3.1.1 Quality face, relational face and social identity face ...................................... 54 3.1.2 Impoliteness and social norms ........................................................................ 56 3.1.3 Sociality rights: Equity and Association rights ............................................... 57 3.2 Impoliteness and intentionality .............................................................................. 58 3.3 Impoliteness and emotions..................................................................................... 59 3.4 Impoliteness and power ......................................................................................... 60 3.5 Entertaining impoliteness and creativity ................................................................ 61 Conclusion ....................................................................................................................... 64 Part III: General corpus study of humorous impoliteness .................................... 65 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 66 1. Presentation of the corpus ............................................................................................ 66 1.1 The Big Bang Theory ............................................................................................. 66 1.2 Sherlock ................................................................................................................. 68 1.3 A few extra notes about the corpus ........................................................................ 70 2. Conventionalised formulaic impoliteness .................................................................... 71 2.1 Culpeper’s impoliteness formulae (2011) .............................................................. 71 2.2 Examples ................................................................................................................ 74 3. Non-conventionalised impoliteness: Implicational impoliteness ................................ 78 3.1 Form-driven impoliteness ...................................................................................... 78 3.1.1 Flouting Grice’s maxims of conversation ....................................................... 78 3.1.2 Mimicry/Imitation ........................................................................................... 81 3.2 Convention-driven impoliteness ............................................................................ 82 3.2.1 Internal mismatch ........................................................................................... 83 3.2.2 External mismatch .......................................................................................... 87 3.3 Nonpoliteness and underpoliteness ........................................................................ 89 4. Dysphemistic directness .............................................................................................. 93 4.1 Taboos and dysphemisms ...................................................................................... 93 4.2 Examples ................................................................................................................ 95 4.2.1 Death ............................................................................................................... 95 4.2.2 Menstruation ................................................................................................... 96 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Magazines V17N9.Qxd
    Feb COF C1:Customer 1/6/2012 2:54 PM Page 1 ORDERS DUE th 18FEB 2012 FEB E COMIC H T SHOP’S CATALOG 02 FEBRUARY COF Apparel Shirt Ad:Layout 1 1/11/2012 1:45 PM Page 1 DC HEROES: “SUPER POWERS” Available only TURQUOISE T-SHIRT from your local comic shop! PREORDER NOW! SPIDER-MAN: DEADPOOL: “POOL SHOT” PLASTIC MAN: “DOUBLE VISION” BLACK T-SHIRT “ALL TIED UP” BURGUNDY T-SHIRT PREORDER NOW! CHARCOAL T-SHIRT PREORDER NOW! PREORDER NOW! COF Gem Page February:gem page v18n1.qxd 1/11/2012 1:29 PM Page 1 STAR WARS: MASS EFFECT: BLOOD TIES— HOMEWORLDS #1 BOBA FETT IS DEAD #1 DARK HORSE COMICS (OF 4) DARK HORSE COMICS WONDER WOMAN #8 DC COMICS RICHARD STARK’S PARKER: STIEG LARSSON’S THE SCORE HC THE GIRL WITH THE DRAGON IDW PUBLISHING TATTOO SPECIAL #1 DC COMICS / VERTIGO SECRET #1 IMAGE COMICS AMERICA’S GOT POWERS #1 (OF 6) AVENGERS VS. X-MEN: IMAGE COMICS VS. #1 (OF 6) MARVEL COMICS COF FI page:FI 1/12/2012 10:00 AM Page 1 FEATURED ITEMS COMICS & GRAPHIC NOVELS Girl Genius Volume 11: Agatha Heterodyne and the Hammerless Bell TP/HC G AIRSHIP ENTERTAINMENT Strawberry Shortcake Volume 1: Berry Fun TP G APE ENTERTAINMENT Bart Simpson‘s Pal, Milhouse #1 G BONGO COMICS Fanboys Vs. Zombies #1 G BOOM! STUDIOS 1 1 Roger Langridge‘s Snarked! Volume 1 TP G BOOM! STUDIOS/KABOOM! Lady Death Origins: Cursed #1 G BOUNDLESS COMICS The Shadow #1 G D. E./DYNAMITE ENTERTAINMENT The Shadow: Blood & Judgment TP G D.
    [Show full text]
  • DOE DE We Je Kennis Over the Big HET APPARTEMENT KWAM BEKIJKEN, WAT STOND ER TOEN OP DE MUUR in DE SLAAP­ Big Bang Theory
    5 TOEN LEONARD REAGEERDE OP Bij de start van seizoen 11 van SHELDONS ADVERTENTIE VOOR EEN onze favoriete sitcom testen NIEUWE HUISGENOOT, EN VOOR HET EERST DOE DE we je kennis over The Big HET APPARTEMENT KWAM BEKIJKEN, WAT STOND ER TOEN OP DE MUUR IN DE SLAAP- BiG Bang Theory. En we vlogen KAMER VAN DE VORIGE HUURDER? naar Londen om Kunal a. Die Sheldon die b. Welcome to hell Nayyar (Raj) en Big Bang- c. Death to Sheldon creator Chuck Lorre aan de d. Run while you still can tand te voelen. Bazinga! WIE IS DE EERSTE VROUW TEGEN WIE BANG TEKST SARA MADOU 6 RAJ DURFDE TE PRATEN? a. Bernadette BEDENKER CHUCK LORRE: b. Lucy c. Penny ‘Alleen Penny EN TEST JE KENNIS VAN DE spreekt de taal QUIZ van jou en mij’ ALLERGRAPPIGSTE VERONICA-SERIE Chuck Lorre (1952) is de koning van de hit- shows: onder meer Two and a Half Men, Mom en Mike & Molly komen uit zijn koker. Maar op The Big Bang Theory is hij het trotst: „Bill Prady (co-schrijver en producer, red.) en ik 1 WELKE FICTIEVE TAAL bedachten een show over een jonge vrouw die SPREEKT HOWARD? naar Los Angeles komt om haar geluk te a. Klingon beproeven. Daarna hadden we het erover dat b. Elvish Bill in de jaren 80 als computer programmeur c. Smurf werkte met een groep heel slimme mannen, die niet in staat waren om een fatsoenlijk gesprek met een vrouw te voeren. Ik zei: ‘Bill, dat is 2 HOE OUD WAS LEONARD onze show! Laten we dát nou samenvoegen TOEN HIJ ZIJN MASTERS met het meisje dat naar LA vertrekt!’ Penny is DEGREE HAALDE? als een soort surrogaat-publiek, omdat ze a.
    [Show full text]
  • INDICE 1. Introduzione 3 2. Rassegna Della Letteratura 7 3. Metodo 15 4
    INDICE 1. Introduzione 3 2. Rassegna della letteratura 7 2.1. Introduzione 7 2.2. Studi linguistici sulla sitcom The Big Bang Theory 7 2.3. Conclusioni 13 3. Metodo 15 3.1. Introduzione 15 3.2. Quesiti della ricerca 15 3.3. Quadro teorico di riferimento 15 3.3.1. Il Principio Cooperativo di Grice 16 3.3.2. La Teoria della Pertinenza di Sperber e Wilson 22 3.3.3. La cortesia 25 3.3.3.1. Il modello di Leech 26 3.3.3.2. Il modello di Brown e Levinson 32 3.3.3.3. Conclusioni 36 3.4. Raccolta, preparazione e analisi dei dati 37 3.4.1. Raccolta dei dati 37 3.4.2. Preparazione dei dati 38 3.4.3. Analisi qualitativa 40 3.4.4 Analisi quantitativa 53 3.5. Conclusioni 53 4. Risultati 55 4.1. Introduzione 55 4.2. Risultati analitici quantitativi e qualitativi della ricerca 55 4.2.1. Risultati della prima stagione 56 4.2.2. Risultati della seconda stagione 62 4.2.3. Risultati della terza stagione 69 4.2.4. Risultati della quarta stagione 75 4.2.5. Risultati della quinta stagione 82 4.2.6. Risultati della sesta stagione 88 4.2.7. Risultati della settima stagione 94 4.2.8. Risultati della ottava stagione 101 4.2.9. Risultati della nona stagione 107 1 4.2.10. Risultati della decima stagione 114 4.3. Risultati quantitativi e qualitativi sintetici della ricerca 120 4.3.1. (In)efficienza comunicativa 120 4.3.1.2. Il Principio Cooperativo di Grice 120 4.3.1.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Bazinga! Uma Análise Neotribal Da Sitcom the Big Bang Theory Arthur
    Intercom – Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Interdisciplinares da Comunicação XVI Congresso de Ciências da Comunicação na Região Sudeste – São Paulo - SP – 12 a 14 de maio de 2011 Bazinga! Uma Análise Neotribal Da Sitcom The Big Bang Theory 1 Arthur Carlos FRANCO OLIVEIRA 2 Mirna TONUS 3 Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG RESUMO O presente artigo tem como objetivo analisar a sitcom The Big Bang Theory sob a ótica da teoria neotribalista proposta por Michel Maffesoli. A partir do método observacional, assistiu-se a todos os episódios das quatro temporadas da sitcom, procurando identificar em seus personagens elementos que os relacionassem a uma neotribo. Assim, foi possível concluir que os sujeitos analisados não atendem a todas as características de uma neotribo. PALAVRAS-CHAVE: sitcom, neotribalismo, televisão, humor. “Bazinga!” – Sheldon Cooper Desde o surgimento da televisão, suas funções têm sido as mais diversas. Informar, emocionar e fazer rir são alguns dos papéis que ela exerce no contexto atual. Suas atrações sempre buscam aumentar a audiência e cativar o público, sendo que, nos últimos anos, a televisão tem mais do que nunca se utilizado do público para fazer sucesso. Séries humorísticas, programas de auditório recheados de casos engraçados e comentários ácidos e inteligentes são alguns artifícios veiculados para divertir o público. E, entre os programas de humor, estão as chamadas sitcoms . O termo, segundo o Dicionário da Língua Portuguesa4, é uma série televisiva que aborda situações do dia–a-dia em tom de comédia. A palavra vem do termo inglês “situation comedy ”, que, literalmente, significa situação de comédia. Desde o seu 1 Trabalho apresentado no DT 4 – Comunicação Audiovisua do XVI Congresso de Ciências da Comunicação na Região Sudeste realizado de 12 a 14 de maio de 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • REDEFINING “NERDINESS”: the Big Bang Theory Reconsidered REDEFINING “NERDINESS”: Many Studies Define “Nerdiness” Differently
    ARTICLE Title REDEFINING “NERDINESS”: The Big Bang Theory Reconsidered REDEFINING “NERDINESS”: Many studies define “nerdiness” differently. Some textual cues including explicit and implicit cues. These would define gifted students as “nerds” (O’Connor 293), terms are adopted from Culpeper’s The Language and The Big Bang Theory Reconsidered suggesting that the word is based solely on intelligence. Characterisation: People in Plays and Other Texts, in which he Others may define “nerds” as “physical self-loathing [and explains that these textual cues can help a viewer make having] technological mastery” (Eglash 49), suggesting certain inferences about a specific character (Language that “nerds” have body issues or are somehow more and Characterisation 167). Explicit cues are when charac- BY JACLYN GINGRICH technologically savvy than the average person. Bednarek ters specifically express information about themselves or defines “nerdiness” as displaying the following linguistic others (Language of Characterisation 167). An example framework: “believes in his own intelligence,” “was a child would be when Leonard says, “Yeah, I’m a frickin’ genius” ABSTRACT it is that they are average people socializing with each prodigy,” “struggles with social skills,” “is different,” “is health (“The Middle Earth Paradigm”). Here he is explicitly other and living normal lives. The Big Bang Theory displays This paper analyzes the linguistic characteristics of Leonard obsessed/has food issues,” “has an affinity for and knowl- saying that he believes he has intellectual superiority. the comical reality of what normally happens in these Hofstadter, television character from The Big Bang Theory and edge of computer-related activities,” “does not like change,” Implicit cues are implied.
    [Show full text]
  • Interpretation of Verbal Humor in the Sitcom the Big Bang Theory from the Perspective of Adaptation-Relevance Theory
    ISSN 1799-2591 Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol. 3, No. 12, pp. 2220-2226, December 2013 © 2013 ACADEMY PUBLISHER Manufactured in Finland. doi:10.4304/tpls.3.12.2220-2226 Interpretation of Verbal Humor in the Sitcom The Big Bang Theory from the Perspective of Adaptation-relevance Theory Zejun Ma School of Foreign Languages, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China Man Jiang School of Foreign Languages, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China Abstract—Humor plays a very important role in every sphere of our daily life, especially verbal humor which is mainly carried by language use in a certain context to achieve humorous effect. As a special carrier of humor, sitcom, which is a type of comedy performance, has attracted millions of audiences with humorous utterances all over the world. The American sitcom The Big Bang Theory has been one of the most popular American sitcoms in China within these years which largely count on verbal humor to create general humorous effect. Based on the achievements made by previous researchers, the present study explores the verbal humor in the American sitcom The Big Bang Theory in the light of a new model—Adaptation-Relevance model so as to reveal its interpretive power of humor and its feasibility in analyzing verbal humor in the sitcom The Big Bang Theory. The paper mainly adopts the qualitative and descriptive methods to analyze the selected examples and finally comes to a conclusion that this Adaptation-Relevance model which is an integration of two powerful pragmatic theories holds the interpretive power for verbal humor and has feasibility in analyzing verbal humor by using the data in sitcom The Big Bang Theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Usf-Graduate-Studies-Electronic-Thesis-And-Dissertation-Guidebook.Pdf
    Electronic Thesis & Dissertation Guidebook Prepared for students by the Office of Graduate Studies Updated June 6, 2014 Table of Contents List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ iii List of Examples ......................................................................................................................................... iv Chapter One: Understanding the ETD Process ......................................................................................... 1 Chapter Two: Deadlines ............................................................................................................................. 2 Chapter Three: Process Checklists .............................................................................................................. 3 Master’s Thesis Process Checklist .................................................................................................. 3 Preparing for Your Final Semester .................................................................................... 3 Beginning Your Final Semester ......................................................................................... 3 Plagiarism Check and Certificate of Approval Submission ............................................... 3 Upload the Committee-approved ETD to the USF ProQuest Website ........................... 3 After the ETD Has Been Submitted to ProQuest ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sheldon Cooper Display Maggie Mason Smith Clemson University, [email protected]
    Clemson University TigerPrints Presentations University Libraries 12-2014 Sheldon Cooper Display Maggie Mason Smith Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/lib_pres Part of the Library and Information Science Commons Recommended Citation Mason Smith, Maggie, "Sheldon Cooper Display" (2014). Presentations. 33. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/lib_pres/33 This Display is brought to you for free and open access by the University Libraries at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in Presentations by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Sheldon Cooper Display December 2014 Sheldon Cooper Display Photograph taken by Micki Reid, Sign created by Cassie Thomas, Cooper Library Public Information Coordinator Cooper Library Weekend Supervisor Display Description A new display has been created for the library's New Books Shelf, and this month, it's centered on fictional physicist Sheldon Cooper. On display you will find the first season of The Big Bang Theory along with all things Sheldon: trains, Texas, Star Trek, Star Wars, Firefly, comics, cats, and of course, theoretical physics. The display will remain up throughout the month of December. - Posted on Clemson University Libraries’ Blog, December 3rd 2014 Works on Display • Aczel, Amir D. Present at the Creation: The Story of CERN and the Large Hadron Collider. New York: Crown, 2010. Print. QC787.P73A29 2010. • The Big Bang Theory: The Complete First Season. Pro. Chuck Lorre, Bill Prady, Lee Aronsohn. Perf. Johnny Galecki, Jim Parsons, Kaley Cuoco-Sweeting. Warner Home Video, 2008. DVD. PN1992.77.B54 2008. • Bird, Kai, and Martin J.
    [Show full text]
  • It's Time to Meet the Muppets
    #ANALOG IT’S TIME TO MEET THE MUPPETS fter 40 years of dating, uploaded to YouTube, where Miss Piggy and Kermit it’s garnered more than a the Frog have called it million views. The ofcial quits. The iconic char- trailer for the show, also on acters announced their YouTube, has 1.1 million Asplit at ABC’s summer press tour last views. A strong social pres- month — just in time to build buzz around ence has helped maintain the soon-to-be launched primetime sitcom excitement around the show, The Muppets, which premieres on ABC and the couple drama has later this month. been built into promos, The couple publicly addressed the split which feature current (hu- on social media, releasing a joint state- man) ABC TV stars. ment on Twitter saying they will, despite The new series will main- the breakup, “continue to work together tain the mockumentary style on television and in all media now known of the pitch and will move or hereafter devised, in perpetuity, away from the variety show throughout the universe.” format of the original. “The goal here is alongside copy that reads, “Finally. A net- Since the announcement, the show has to be exactly the same and completely dif- work TV show with full frontal nudity.” In been met with positive feedback, and the ferent,” Bill Prady, one of the show’s exec- another, Fozzie Bear is shown getting his marketing has played of the target audi- utive producers, told The Hollywood Reporter. back waxed; the accompanying line reads ence’s nostalgia for the original The Muppet Adds Bob Kushell, another executive pro- “Changing the TV manscape.” Show from the mid-1970s.
    [Show full text]
  • Filosofická Fakulta Masarykovy Univerzity
    Masaryk University Faculty of Arts Department of English and American Studies English Language and Literature Bc. Jana Vaverková Accents of English in Czech Dubbing Master‘s Diploma Thesis Supervisor: PhDr. KateřinaTomková, Ph.D. 2018 I declare that I have worked on this thesis independently, using only the primary and secondary sources listed in the bibliography. …………………………………………….. Author‘s signature I would like to thank to my supervisor, PhDr. KateřinaTomková, Ph.D., for valuable pieces of advice not only with my diploma thesis and also to my family for their never ending support and love. Table of Contents List of Tables .................................................................................................................... 8 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 9 1 Accents of English .............................................................................................. 12 1.1 What Is an Accent ............................................................................................... 12 1.2 General British and General American ............................................................... 13 1.2.1 Received Pronunciation and General British ............................................ 13 1.2.2 General American ..................................................................................... 15 1.2.3 Difference between General British and General American .................... 16 1.3 Non-Native Accents of English
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 1 ALL in the FAMILY ARCHIE Bunker Emmy AWARD
    ALL IN THE FAMILY ARCHIE Bunker Based on the British sitcom Till MEATHEAD Emmy AWARD winner for all DEATH Us Do Part MIKE Stivic four lead actors DINGBAT NORMAN Lear (creator) BIGOT EDITH Bunker Archie Bunker’s PLACE (spinoff) Danielle BRISEBOIS FIVE consecutive years as QUEENS CARROLL O’Connor number-one TV series Rob REINER Archie’s and Edith’s CHAIRS GLORIA (spinoff) SALLY Struthers displayed in Smithsonian GOOD Times (spinoff) Jean STAPLETON Institution 704 HAUSER (spinoff) STEPHANIE Mills CHECKING In (spinoff) The JEFFERSONS (spinoff) “STIFLE yourself.” “Those Were the DAYS” MALAPROPS Gloria STIVIC (theme) MAUDE (spinoff) WORKING class T S Q L D A H R S Y C V K J F C D T E L A W I C H S G B R I N H A A U O O A E Q N P I E V E T A S P B R C R I O W G N E H D E I E L K R K D S S O I W R R U S R I E R A P R T T E S Z P I A N S O T I C E E A R E J R R G M W U C O G F P B V C B D A E H T A E M N F H G G A M A L A P R O P S E E A N L L A R C H I E M U L N J N I O P N A M R O N Z F L D E I D R E D O O G S T I V I C A E N I K H T I D E T S A L L Y Y U A I O M Y G S T X X Z E D R S Q M 1 84052-2 TV Trivia Word Search Puzzles.indd 1 10/31/19 12:10 PM THE BIG BANG THEORY The show has a science Sheldon COOPER Mayim Bialik has a Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Synopsis of the Big Bang Theory's Main Characters Dr. Leonard
    Synopsis of the Big Bang Theory's Main Characters Dr. Leonard Hofstadter Experimental Physicist at Caltech Best Friends with roommate Sheldon Come from a family of over-achievers; feels overshadowed by highly accomplished brothers and sisters and aims to be considered accomplished by his mother Is the most socially adept of the four male scientists Has a crush for Penny, whom he eventually dates Dr. Sheldon Cooper Theoretical Physicist at Caltech Best Friends with roommate Leonard A child prodigy, holds multiple university degrees, received his PhD at 16 Shows traits of Asperger's syndrome and Obsessive Compulsive personality disorder Has both an eidetic memory and extensive knowledge of multiple fields Is dating Amy, who shares similar intellectual and personality traits with Sheldon Penny Waitress at the Cheesecake Factory Moved from Nebraska to California to become an Actress, in recent seasons she has taken acting lessons to achieve her goal Did not go to college/university, but in recent seasons has enrolled in community college While she does not have a higher education, she has the most "street smarts" of all the main characters and is extremely knowledgeable about pop culture Is outgoing and has had many romantic relationships; is currently dating Leonard Howard Wolowitz Aerospace Engineer at Caltech Holds a Master's degree from MIT; gets constantly picked on by the other male characters for his lack of PhD; trained for a mission to the International Space station Best friends with Raj Is a womanizer; thinks he is a ladies' man, but fails spectacularly each time he attempts to pick up a woman Lives at home with his mother (until he marries Bernadette) Eventually falls in loves and marries Bernadette, toning down some of Howard's womanizing personality Dr.
    [Show full text]