Automatic Signaling, Train Stop, and Route Interlocking Installed in The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Automatic Signaling, Train Stop, and Route Interlocking Installed in The 252 View of track along a station platform with an automatic sign a 1 at t h e right Below - Motorman operating the release at an automatic signal Automatic Signaling, Train .Stop RouTE No. 1 of the Chicago Subway system, placed in service in October, 1943, includes modern automatic block signaling, automatic train-stop equipment, and 3 all-relay route­ control interlockings. This Route No. 1, the first portion of a proposed ex­ tensive subway system, connects witl1 the North Side Elevated Lines near Armitage and Sheffield avenues, ex­ tends southeast in Clybourn avenue, east in Division street and south in State street to a connection with the South Side Elevated Lines near Seventeenth street, the total length of the double-track subway being 4.9 miles. Route No. 2, which is 3.85 miles long, connects with the North­ west Elevated Lines near Milwaukee and Evergreen avenues, extends southeast in Milwaukee avenue, east in Lake street, and south in Dearborn street, where it is to continue west in Congress street to a loop east of the river. This route No. 2, now about 80 per cent complete, wi ll be fini shed as soon as war conditions permit. Plans for future subways include al- 253 Automatic signaling for 40 trains each hour includes time­ dis t ance-speed con trois on decend­ ing grades and on approach to stations­ Three interlockings are· especially de­ signed fo r rapid change of line-up Panel of the UR in­ terlocking machine at the South Portal includes four main tracks, the two center tracks for express trains and the two outside tracks for local trains. The subway is double track and all trains stop at all stations. In order that trains from any of the four tracks from the north can be routed to either track in the subway or vice versa, the track layout at the north portal was designed with crossovers and Route Interlocking and switches, as shown in Fig. 2, in which the tracks from the subway emerge on an ascending grade as the Installed in the Chicago Subways two middle tracks, with two elevated tracks on each side. This layout in­ cludes 8 crossovers, 2 single switches and 34 signals, which are controlled most 42 miles of additional subways whereas the elevated crosses the river by an all-relay route-control ma­ to be constructed as finances become on a drawbridge, and quite often this chine in a tower at Armitage avenue. available. bridge has to be raised for the passage South of the south portal at Seven­ of a boat, with the result that trains teenth street, the South Side Ele­ Utilization of Route No. 1 operating on the elevated structures vated has three tracks, one track on are seriously delayed. each side is for local stops as well as The purpose for these subways is Since the subway was placed in for certain through trains, while the to extend local rapid transit facilities, service, the traffic has increased rap­ center track is fo r through express expedite train movements and ulti­ idly, not only because of the improved trains between Seventeenth streetand mately to permit the removal of the service, but also due to the fact that Indiana avenue, this track being used elevated track structure in the down­ the rationing of tires and gasoline has in one direction or the other depend­ town area. The "L" trains now oper­ forced many persons to abandon ing on the preponderance of traffic ; ating through subway Route No. 1 automobile transportation and use the for example, northbound in the from the South Side Elevated to the rapid transit lines. morning inbound rush hours, or North Side Elevated and vice versa southbound in the evening outbound fo rmerly operated on the elevated Track Layout of Route No. 1 rush. In order that trains can be structure in the downtown area and routed in either direction between now save from 7 to 22 minutes daily Not all of the trains to and from the three-track elevated lines and for each of thousands of passengers. the south or the north use the new either the subway or the elevated A further advantage is that the subway, and, therefore, the track lay­ north of Seventeenth street, the track stations on the new subway are lo­ outs at the portals were designed layout is designed as shown in Fig. cated more conveniently with refer­ so that trains can be routed to or 3. This layout includes 4 crossovers. ence to important stores and office from either the subway or the ele­ 1 single switch and 17 interlocking buildings. ' Another is that the sub­ vated structure through the down­ signals, wh ich are controlled by an way goes under the Chi cago river, town area. The North Side Elevated all-relay route interlocking machine 254 RAILWAY SIGNALING May, 1944 in a tower north of Eighteenth street. mechanisms which are equipped with the train line thus causing an emer­ The details of the construction and electric locks, the control of which gency application of the brakes on operation of these interlockings will will be explained later. the entire train. be explained later in this article. The red aspect of any of the auto­ Where the subway under State Automatic Block Signaling matic block signals indicates Stop-and street turns east to connect with the Then-Proceed. When the train stops, elevated structure at Thirteenth The automatic block signaling in the motorman must lean out his win­ street, excavation was made arid bulk­ the subway is arranged for train dow to operate a stop release, mounted headed for a future extension south operation in one direction only, right- near the signal, which causes the trip under State street. The northbound tube of this future extension, built at a lower level to provide grade sep­ __/"-­ / - r aration, is equipped with a stub track / / with a Y connection to the present '\. // II tracks and can be used to double back +-o~" trains from the north. This track lay­ ...._<v // out consists of three switches and 10 ()XI'' ~/ signals controlled from an interlock­ // // // ing machine. / / On the 4.9 miles of double-track .. ~ ... subway between North Portal and Fig. 1-Map of the Route No. 1 of the Chicago subways South Portal, trains are ordinarily hand running on each track. The sig­ arm to be lowered to its normal posi­ operated right-hand running. In or­ nals are of the color-light type which tion, thus allowing the train to pass der to permit maintenance forces to display the conventional aspects red, without the brakes being applied. work on a section of track, all trains yellow or green. At each signal and in both directions can be operated on at rail level there is an automatic trip Track Capacity Determined by the other track during slack periods type train stop which is in depressed Train Speeds, Spacing Between between 2 a.m. and 5 a.m. In order to position as long as the signal displays Trains and Braking Distances sectionalize the tracks for this pur­ either the green or the yellow aspect, The automatic signaling was pose, there are two sets of diamond but when the signal displays the red planned to attain two objectives ; to crossovers, one just south of the sta- aspect, the trip arm is raised to a level operate the trains at the maximum Fig. 2-Track and signal plan of the interlocking at the South Portal tion at Grand avenue and the other where it will strike and operate an speeds which are practicable in con­ south of the station at North avenue. air valve on each car of a train, if the sideration of the spacing of stations These crossover switches are operated train is driven past the signal. Oper­ and the tractive effort of the equip­ by hand-operated switch-and-lock ation of this valve releases the air in ment, and also to get as many trains --sn------_ ~ ~ 1:!! 42 ~ lli L~ ------~2o ~cc-------4o-~- r-r 1 ~---- ~u=--.....,6:-::-zc- -:.Eo..w:!!o..subway ~ 18 28 J: :::::::=-:=:::: 44 :r .L.., 46 C 66 Tk.J ~16 __]---- 32C__ .;_ 1 -=I-:::.:IJ-0 -==-----,-+-_-4-=-=~----:=::-----:~=---~68 c· 10 1 1 I 1-1 I 1-1~ J4l J61 '5oTl "!154 '411 m Fig. 3-Track and signal plan of the interlocking at North Portal May, 1944 RAILWAY SIGNALING 255 over the line as possible by reducing an hour. On ascending grades the grades. In consideration of all these the space between trains to a mini­ train braking distance is shorter and, factors, the speed of trains when mum that is consistent with that re­ therefore, the block lengths can be descending grades is limited by rule quired to stop short of a train ahead. correspondingly shorter, thereby to certain maximums as marked on On this basis, for the normal run- automatically reducing the space be- signs along the track, and the signal- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ------D~--~d~----c=rO~----~c------~6~----~b~-----D------a--------~ Fig. 4-Diagram showing control limits of signals and train stop ning speed between stations th e min­ tween following trains to compensate ing and train-stop system include imum spacing of signals is the di s­ for the reduced speed when ascending special grade-time-distance controls tance required to stop a train running the g-rade. arranged so that the brakes are ap­ at maximum speed with an emer­ plied automatically if this maximum oency application of the brakes, plus Descending Grade a Different speed is exceeded.
Recommended publications
  • NSG 604 Indicators and Signs
    This is an uncontrolled copy. Before use, make sure that this is the current version by visiting www.railsafe.org.au/nsg NSG 604 signals and signs Indicators and signs General To describe the types of indicators and signs used in the Network. ............................................................................................... NOTE The Figures in this Rule show examples of the indicators and signs used in the Network. White or lunar white lights are shown in blue . ............................................................................................... Clearance posts Clearance posts may be located between two converging lines to show the clearance limit. Some clearance posts have: • a reflective background, or • a white light that must be illuminated at night or in conditions of low visibility. White reflective post forms Illuminated post form FIGURE 1: Examples of clearance posts ............................................................................................... NETWORK RULES MARCH 2019 V10.0 © SYDNEY TRAINS 2019 PAGE 1 OF 38 This is an uncontrolled copy. Before use, make sure that this is the current version by visiting www.railsafe.org.au/nsg NSG 604 signals and signs Indicators and signs Dead end lights Dead end lights are small red lights to indicate the end of dead end sidings. The lights display STOP indications only. If it is possible for a dead end light to be mistaken as a running signal at STOP, a white light above the red light is used to distinguish it from a running signal. FIGURE 2: Examples of dead end lights ............................................................................................... NETWORK RULES MARCH 2019 V10.0 © SYDNEY TRAINS 2019 PAGE 2 OF 38 This is an uncontrolled copy. Before use, make sure that this is the current version by visiting www.railsafe.org.au/nsg NSG 604 signals and signs Indicators and signs Guard’s indicator If it is possible for the signal at the exit-end of a platform to be obscured from a Guard’s view, a Guard’s indicator is placed over the platform.
    [Show full text]
  • RAIB Report: Freight Train Derailment at Angerstein Junction on 3 June 2015
    Oliver Stewart Senior Executive, RAIB Relationship and Recommendation Handling Telephone 020 7282 3864 E-mail [email protected] 4 June 2020 Mr Andrew Hall Deputy Chief Inspector of Rail Accidents Cullen House Berkshire Copse Rd Aldershot Hampshire GU11 2HP Dear Andrew, RAIB Report: Freight train derailment at Angerstein Junction on 3 June 2015 I write to provide an update1 on the action taken in respect of recommendation 3 addressed to ORR in the above report, published on 1 June 2016. The annex to this letter provides details of the action taken regarding the recommendation. The status of recommendation 3 is ‘Implemented’. We do not propose to take any further action in respect of the recommendation, unless we become aware that any of the information provided has become inaccurate, in which case I will write to you again. We will publish this response on the ORR website on 5 June 2020. Yours sincerely, Oliver Stewart 1 In accordance with Regulation 12(2)(b) of the Railways (Accident Investigation and Reporting) Regulations 2005 Annex A Recommendation 3 The intent of this recommendation is to ensure that the derailment risk at Angerstein Junction is adequately controlled. Network Rail should review and, if appropriate, alter the infrastructure configuration on the line between Angerstein Junction and Angerstein Wharf sidings to reduce its contribution to the derailment risk in the immediate vicinity of the 851A trap points. This review should include, but not be limited to, consideration of: • the wagon types and loads normally using the line; • the layout of the check rail; • the speed and braking profiles of trains using the line; • the locations and operation of signalling equipment; and • the location of the trap points, or the provision of alternative risk mitigation measures ORR decision 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Railroad Administration Office of Safety Headquarters Assigned Accident Investigation Report HQ-2006-24 CSX Transportati
    Federal Railroad Administration Office of Safety Headquarters Assigned Accident Investigation Report HQ-2006-24 CSX Transportation (CSX) Richmond, Virginia April 22, 2006 Note that 49 U.S.C. §20903 provides that no part of an accident or incident report made by the Secretary of Transportation/Federal Railroad Administration under 49 U.S.C. §20902 may be used in a civil action for damages resulting from a matter mentioned in the report. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FRA FACTUAL RAILROAD ACCIDENT REPORT FRA File # HQ-2006-24 FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION 1.Name of Railroad Operating Train #1 1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No. CSX Transportation [CSX ] CSX R000022015 2.Name of Railroad Operating Train #2 2a. Alphabetic Code 2b. Railroad Accident/Incident N/A N/A N/A 3.Name of Railroad Responsible for Track Maintenance: 3a. Alphabetic Code 3b. Railroad Accident/Incident No. CSX Transportation [CSX ] CSX N/A 4. U.S. DOT_AAR Grade Crossing Identification Number 5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident Month Day Year 04 22 2006 05:19:00 AM PM 7. Type of Accident/Indicent 1. Derailment 4. Side collision 7. Hwy-rail crossing 10. Explosion-detonation 13. Other (single entry in code box) 2. Head on collision 5. Raking collision 8. RR grade crossing 11. Fire/violent rupture (describe in narrative) 3. Rear end collision 6. Broken Train collision 9. Obstruction 12. Other impacts 01 8. Cars Carrying 9. HAZMAT Cars 10. Cars Releasing 11. People 12. Division HAZMAT Damaged/Derailed HAZMAT Evacuated 0 0 0 0 FLORENCE 13. Nearest City/Town 14.
    [Show full text]
  • [(Central] [Central, 6 E -1 4
    /NEWYORK^ Fnewyork^ [(Central] [Central, 6 e -1 4 Reference Marks NEW YORK CENTRAL LC.L Between POPULAR ALL-COACH DAYLINER Dally. II Meal station. Sunday only. • Thla train does not carry baggage SERVICE ADVANTAGES Chicago, Pittsburgh & Boston Daily except Sunday- Ex. Sun.—Runs dally except Sunday. Daily except Monday. E.T.—Eastern Standard Time. Daily except Saturday. C.T.—Central Standard Time. In addition to the train service shown, buses of the United Traction Company run at frequent intervals between Albany and Troy. | I i^i ichedulot . pcart'd to 5 Packing and handling research Stops on signal to receive passengers for stations beyond Albuny. traffic requirement! for most ... they assure the security ol Stops to receive or discbarge passengers for or from Astatabula and beyond. Stops except Saturdays and Sundays. rX|M*llitioilH .1. Ii\ i-r n--. the shipped merchandise. bb Stops at 6.25 a. m. to discharge passengers from Rochester and beyond or to 2 Free pick up and delivery ser• receive passengers for Chicago. Smooth operation . easy 4 Stops on signal to receive passengers for beyond Troy. vice . direct from Hliippcr's grades... superlative roadbed. Stops on signal to discharge or receive passengers. to roiisipiirrV door. No baggage handled for or from this station; *y Constant supervision and pro• Stops regularly, but only to receive passengers. * f Optional trucking allowance to tection in transit.. still mon Stops only to discbarge passengers. nhi|»|MTH jiiul roiittignrcR ... a security for shipped merchan Runs Saturdays only. mi I • i i ii i ii I tavina to both. dise.
    [Show full text]
  • Rtd Light Rail Design Criteria
    RTD LIGHT RAIL DESIGN CRITERIA Regional Transportation District November 2005 Prepared by the Engineering Division of the Regional Transportation District Regional Transportation District 1600 Blake Street Denver, Colorado 80202-1399 303.628.9000 RTD-Denver.com November 28, 2005 The RTD Light Rail Design Criteria Manual has been developed as a set of general guidelines as well as providing specific criteria to be employed in the preparation and implementation of the planning, design and construction of new light rail corridors and the extension of existing corridors. This 2005 issue of the RTD Light Rail Design Criteria Manual was developed to remain in compliance with accepted practices with regard to safety and compatibility with RTD's existing system and the intended future systems that will be constructed by RTD. The manual reflects the most current accepted practices and applicable codes in use by the industry. The intent of this manual is to establish general criteria to be used in the planning and design process. However, deviations from these accepted criteria may be required in specific instances. Any such deviations from these accepted criteria must be approved by the RTD's Executive Safety & Security Committee. Coordination with local agencies and jurisdictions is still required for the determination and approval for fire protection, life safety, and security measures that will be implemented as part of the planning and design of the light rail system. Conflicting information or directives between the criteria set forth in this manual shall be brought to the attention of RTD and will be addressed and resolved between RTD and the local agencies andlor jurisdictions.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Railroad Administration, DOT § 235.7
    Federal Railroad Administration, DOT § 235.7 railroads that operate on standard gage (5) Removal of an intermittent auto- track which is part of the general rail- matic train stop system in conjunction road system of transportation. with the implementation of a positive (b) This part does not apply to rail train control system approved by FRA rapid transit operations conducted over under subpart I of part 236 of this chap- track that is used exclusively for that ter. purpose and that is not part of the gen- (b) When the resultant arrangement eral system of railroad transportation. will comply with part 236 of this title, it is not necessary to file for approval § 235.5 Changes requiring filing of ap- to decrease the limits of a system as plication. follows: (a) Except as provided in § 235.7, ap- (1) Decrease of the limits of an inter- plications shall be filed to cover the locking when interlocked switches, de- following: rails, or movable-point frogs are not in- (1) The discontinuance of a block sig- volved; nal system, interlocking, traffic con- (2) Removal of electric or mechanical trol system, automatic train stop, lock, or signal used in lieu thereof, train control, or cab signal system or from hand-operated switch in auto- other similar appliance or device; matic block signal or traffic control (2) The decrease of the limits of a territory where train speed over the block signal system, interlocking, traf- switch does not exceed 20 miles per fic control system, automatic train hour; or stop, train control, or cab signal sys- (3) Removal of electric or mechanical tem; or lock, or signal used in lieu thereof, (3) The modification of a block signal from hand-operated switch in auto- system, interlocking, traffic control matic block signal or traffic control system, automatic train stop, train territory where trains are not per- control, or cab signal system.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Standards for New Technology Signal Systems for Rail Transit Applications
    Transactions on the Built Environment vol 34, © 1998 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-3509 Developing standards for new technology signal systems for rail transit applications A. F. Rumsey Parsons Transportation, New York, U.S.A. Abstract Radio communications-based train control (CBTC) systems, also referred to as transmission-based signalling (TBS) systems, permit more effective utilization of rail transit infrastructure by allowing trains to operate safety at much closer headways, by permitting greater flexibility and greater precision in train control, and by providing continuous safe train separation assurance and overspeed protection. One of the challenges facing transit agencies who are considering the introduction of CBTC systems, however, is the lack of industry standards for this emerging technology, and the current inability of trains equipped with CBTC equipment from one supplier to operate on track equipped with CBTC equipment from a second supplier. This paper reports on the status of two separate initiatives being taken in North America to develop standards for CBTC systems for rail transit applications; one based on a voluntary consensus development approach, and the second based on a competitive procurement approach. 1 Background Conventional signalling and train control systems rely almost exclusively on track circuits to detect the presence of trains. Information on the status of the track ahead is provided to train operators either through wayside signals or trainborne cab signals. Ensuring compliance with the signals is achieved either through strict observance of operating procedures, or through automatic train protection features such as wayside electro-mechanical train stops, or trainborne supervisory equipment linked to the train's braking system.
    [Show full text]
  • Low-Cost Highway-Rail Intersection Active Warning System Field
    Low•Cost Highway•Rail Intersection Active Warning System Field Operational Test Evaluation Report Prepared for: December 2005 Low•Cost Highway•Rail Intersection Active Warning System Field Operational Test Evaluation Report Prepared for: Minnesota Department of Transportation Office of Traffic, Security and Operations Prepared by: URS Corporation and TranSmart Technologies, Inc. December 2005 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... v 1. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 ROJECTP PURPOSE............................................................................................................ 2 1.2 ARTICIPANTSP .................................................................................................................. 3 2. PROJECT BACKGROUND................................................................................................ 4 2.1 YSTEMS DEVELOPMENT, TESTING, AND FIELD OPERATIONAL TEST................................ 4 2.2 HUMAN FACTORS EVALUATION....................................................................................... 6 3. REVIEW OF EMERGING HRI TECHNOLOGY ........................................................... 7 3.1 OVERVIEW OF ACTIVE WARNING TECHNOLOGY ............................................................. 7 3.2 MERGINGE HRI TECHNOLOGY........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • LNW Route Specification 2017
    Delivering a better railway for a better Britain Route Specifications 2017 London North Western London North Western July 2017 Network Rail – Route Specifications: London North Western 02 SRS H.44 Roses Line and Branches (including Preston 85 Route H: Cross-Pennine, Yorkshire & Humber and - Ormskirk and Blackburn - Hellifield North West (North West section) SRS H.45 Chester/Ellesmere Port - Warrington Bank Quay 89 SRS H.05 North Transpennine: Leeds - Guide Bridge 4 SRS H.46 Blackpool South Branch 92 SRS H.10 Manchester Victoria - Mirfield (via Rochdale)/ 8 SRS H.98/H.99 Freight Trunk/Other Freight Routes 95 SRS N.07 Weaver Junction to Liverpool South Parkway 196 Stalybridge Route M: West Midlands and Chilterns SRS N.08 Norton Bridge/Colwich Junction to Cheadle 199 SRS H.17 South Transpennine: Dore - Hazel Grove 12 Hulme Route Map 106 SRS H.22 Manchester Piccadilly - Crewe 16 SRS N.09 Crewe to Kidsgrove 204 M1 and M12 London Marylebone to Birmingham Snow Hill 107 SRS H.23 Manchester Piccadilly - Deansgate 19 SRS N.10 Watford Junction to St Albans Abbey 207 M2, M3 and M4 Aylesbury lines 111 SRS H.24 Deansgate - Liverpool South Parkway 22 SRS N.11 Euston to Watford Junction (DC Lines) 210 M5 Rugby to Birmingham New Street 115 SRS H.25 Liverpool Lime Street - Liverpool South Parkway 25 SRS N.12 Bletchley to Bedford 214 M6 and M7 Stafford and Wolverhampton 119 SRS H.26 North Transpennine: Manchester Piccadilly - 28 SRS N.13 Crewe to Chester 218 M8, M9, M19 and M21 Cross City Souh lines 123 Guide Bridge SRS N.99 Freight lines 221 M10 ad M22
    [Show full text]
  • Intelligent Transportation Systems at Highway-Rail Intersections a Cross-Cutting Study
    Intelligent Transportation Systems at Highway-Rail Intersections A Cross-Cutting Study Improving Safety and Mobility at Highway-Rail Grade Crossings December 2001 Intelligent Transportation Systems at Highway-Rail Intersections: A Cross-Cutting Study i Executive Summary In 1997, the ITS Joint Program Office (JPO) at the Federal Highway Administration commissioned a study to identify projects being conducted in the U.S. that used Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) at highway-rail grade crossings, including not only those projects that were Federally-sponsored, but state and locally-sponsored ones, as well. The study identified seven projects that tested five functions: in-vehicle warning, second train warning, use of crossing blockage information for traveler information and traffic management, four quadrant gates with automatic train stop, and a comprehensive set of technologies called the Intelligent Grade Crossing. The following year, the JPO commissioned a cross-cutting study to examine the commonalities and differences among the seven projects. This report documents the findings of that cross-cutting study: · Several railroads were reluctant to fully participate in the projects due to liability, safety and operational concerns. Although there were exceptions, passenger railroads – and, in particular, light rail transit – tended to be more involved in these projects than freight railroads. · In all but one of the seven projects examined in this study, the largest share of funding came from the Federal level, through either direct Federal grants or Congressional designations. In the one project that was the exception to this rule, the largest share of funding came from a private sector technology vendor who made in-kind contributions, using the opportunity of the test to refine its prototype system.
    [Show full text]
  • UPRR - General Code of Operating Rules
    Union Pacific Rules UPRR - General Code of Operating Rules Seventh Edition Effective April 1, 2020 Includes Updates as of September 28, 2021 PB-20280 1.0: GENERAL RESPONSIBILITIES 2.0: RAILROAD RADIO AND COMMUNICATION RULES 3.0: Section Reserved 4.0: TIMETABLES 5.0: SIGNALS AND THEIR USE 6.0: MOVEMENT OF TRAINS AND ENGINES 7.0: SWITCHING 8.0: SWITCHES 9.0: BLOCK SYSTEM RULES 10.0: RULES APPLICABLE ONLY IN CENTRALIZED TRAFFIC CONTROL (CTC) 11.0: RULES APPLICABLE IN ACS, ATC AND ATS TERRITORIES 12.0: RULES APPLICABLE ONLY IN AUTOMATIC TRAIN STOP SYSTEM (ATS) TERRITORY 13.0: RULES APPLICABLE ONLY IN AUTOMATIC CAB SIGNAL SYSTEM (ACS) TERRITORY 14.0: RULES APPLICABLE ONLY WITHIN TRACK WARRANT CONTROL (TWC) LIMITS 15.0: TRACK BULLETIN RULES 16.0: RULES APPLICABLE ONLY IN DIRECT TRAFFIC CONTROL (DTC) LIMITS 17.0: RULES APPLICABLE ONLY IN AUTOMATIC TRAIN CONTROL (ATC) TERRITORY 18.0: RULES APPLICABLE ONLY IN POSITIVE TRAIN CONTROL (PTC) TERRITORY GLOSSARY: Glossary For business purposes only. Unauthorized access, use, distribution, or modification of Union Pacific computer systems or their content is prohibited by law. Union Pacific Rules UPRR - General Code of Operating Rules 1.0: GENERAL RESPONSIBILITIES 1.1: Safety 1.1.1: Maintaining a Safe Course 1.1.2: Alert and Attentive 1.1.3: Accidents, Injuries, and Defects 1.1.4: Condition of Equipment and Tools 1.2: Personal Injuries and Accidents 1.2.1: Care for Injured 1.2.2: Witnesses 1.2.3: Equipment Inspection 1.2.4: Mechanical Inspection 1.2.5: Reporting 1.2.6: Statements 1.2.7: Furnishing Information
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Integrated Automatic Train Stop with Patterns (ATS-P) On-Board System
    Computers in Railways VII, C.A. Brebbia J.Allan, R.J. Hill, G. Sciutto & S. Sone (Editors) © 2000 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISBN 1-85312-826-0 Development of integrated automatic train stop with patterns (ATS-P) on-board system M. Miyachi', H. Ikeda*, H. Tokuhashi* ' Safety Research Laboratory, * Hachioji Branch office East Japan Railway Company, Japan * Kyosan Electric MFG. Company, Japan Abstract The East Japan Railway Company (JR-East) has been introducing aggressively the ATS-P system, which has a high safety record in train operations in preventing serious train accidents since 1989. As the existing ATS-P on-board system has been used for 10 years, a number of problems for the on-board system are recently increasing. Investigation into the causes of these problems are difficult with to the existing system, which has not got appropriate recording devices. In order to improve the cost-effectiveness, the reliability and the maintenance of the system, the ATS-P on-board system should be completely re-designed. The authors have developed the integrated ATS-P on-board system. As a result, the system has the benefit of both the reduction in costs and the improvement in the reliability and also a reduction in the number of devices constituting the on-board system. The existing ATS-P on-board system is composed of several devices, but the integrated ATS-P on-board system is composed of only one main device, a smaller relay block and so on. This system shows results with about 70% of the cost and almost 133% of the reliability of the existing newest on-board system.
    [Show full text]