DOCSLIB.ORG

) ( Vimba Vimba Alburnus Chalcoides

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
) ( Vimba Vimba Alburnus Chalcoides Archive of SID ( ) Alburnus chalcoides ! "$ Vimba vimba ! " # %& " ' * !"# $%& ()* ' $%& & +, -!' ./ , + 0 12 3)* 4 /05 ' $%& (??/C;/;B :@!A* 9* ??/>/;< :78 9*) ! Vimba vimba ! " #$ %&" 6 5 !4, " (RIA) 2&&" 3 + (/0 )"* +,-" " )&'( !" " Alburnus chalcoides " 5 , , A.@C±.AB ?@.>±=.= < + ! ! " )& '( 4 96 +:; " ) .75 " %&" D H : I .(P<@/@F) D !" 2 * E +, 5 " ! " D !" : " )& '( 4 96 +:; " * E ! " D +" 6 J ; " 4 J +,5 " )& '( !" K " #$ .(P<@/@F) D !" : " 5 , , ?±A.B [email protected]±A.B < + ! 4" L2( 5 &7 J2; +M, N9K . D" 6 ( : " 5,, L& 4 2) / & $ ; " + , 5 " " . )&'( +Q7" P O, 4 D M, %; " /& " )&'( ! ! /0 "* +,-" )&'( !" : E-mail: [email protected] : : : * www.SID.ir Archive of SID ... ( – ) !Rutilus rutilus !(Q ! (Suresh et al., 2008 $ Alburnus Abramis brama Vimba vimba 6* % (Rinchard et al. 1997) alburnus $ !"# . &= +0 /W$* 1 $ B@ .// + , -( ) * + ( ) &'( !% $ , + !QR /3 6 V"Q C % 23 , "# % & 0 1 * ./& Suresh et al. ) * KP & ,/W$* - . + 6 4&*5 $** #$ 3 " * R C 3 $ 1 * #] 4 % 03 % .(2008 +78 % /&, "# * $*5 "%= $ E /3 &C3% ^ != BEG ;< * $ (Abdoli and Naderi, 2009) % 6*B +<6 ,2 $ +$* 1 ? *% *@# A*B % 3 * >5 ? = QR /3 #*U +#& ! $*5 "%= % T$ .(Lusk et al., 2004) /% %= ) /% 1= -*& $ Rinchard et al., D) , C Alburnus chalcoides /W$* 1 % O 0 3LMG .(2001 4&*5 $ ( *C( * = #*U G $ " 3 V S & % $ - = ! #$ B$ +E % *% $*& , . + / *S W 2 QR /3 (3 1* $ (Bogutskaya, 1997) "# $ XY !1$*3) &0 / W$* 1 * < / $** 3 " 23 , "# &0 F +#& % 1 ( 1$*[$*5 $ -*Z% +B(0 .(Abdoli and Naderi, 2009) " 3 1, FR / 3 [" 6 5 <EG H *% $ / I" //3 A*B 1 / +* / 3/< B@ % &'( $ " KLMG J"0 IUCN /&% ./( ( *RC3 _* $ N*D % , F(3 .* K*0 * /B O $ / , 4% /P ! 4% QR /3 F % 1/ *% 4 FL , S& Q) *% % #$ Xb XcdY /&8 ab , QP6 ` <3 Abdoli ) + / 1&L +B(0 *S(TU = K* 0 .+6* >5 KP Xcdd +TE .(and Naderi, 2009 * 0 ab XX.e > $ G #$ Z % XY !1$*3 F V* /W$* 1 B@) fd $ B @ ) cb /B3 . + % " 3 $ 1$*[$*5 $ -* , * Q Xb 3 ( T U % 3 _3 Coregonus clupeaformis !H ,= $* $ % 1 . //* /P %C&3 %= $ #$ !&5[ ! (Rinchard et al., 2001) F / $$ KD% 1T (3 (ripe) / Murayama et al., ) Sardinops melanosticus " 3 , FE) Q* $ + *) /% G Unal ) Chalcalburnus tarichi ! ! (1994 % +8 KD% ,& 1T (3 (gravid) QR / 3 #*U 1, &'( $ (et al., 2006 Patterson et al., ) //* <3 % /EU C Capoeta ! 1U 2 - G $ V * b/bX +) % 1 1,$ (3# .(2004 !, N ! (Erdogan et al., 2002) capoeta ./* *,/ *Q +) % F ! (Malison et al., 1994) Stizostedion vitreum Sen et al., 2002; ) Labeo rohita ! /& \ www.SID.ir Archive of SID 4 1 <7 &89: ; 4267 5 4 !3- 12 ! "#$ % &'* +,- &/0 $ + *) (* Q V* , *() 5 / .+ / QR /3 Q* $ % &B K$83 * ab N*7 F# 1 /% * S# +0 +iQj % ) F 5 /&& h % $ h\ // *) % ( * V* Q Xbb / $ * ,) ""[$ /&*6 1 ( $ / V^ ) O @ ) _3 *S# * /W$* 1 % 3/(L ( &0 , FE) 3 $ / $ 1# -*& +3 # % % S% 1/(3 , .//* /S -' V* ,/0 Fostier )/&% "6\ /j 5$*3$& 1 $ fbbb ( [8* % V* ,/0 _3 E2 ! +$$ / -M# .(et al., 1983 1= , /B% .+6*>5 KP <) Xb K/ % <) / 3 % * ^ & / E $ * p 3 % /3 C6 _ * 1 * ,/ 1, 3 V* ( (3 r/% ([Q$) , q3$*5 ST ,= % k & ( .// /S (^ / ! (3 F / , /B% ./% O(^3 % B@ *% 1 .// * F<& (C21 /W$* PD#) W< 1 @$ % *C\ + , 8 % (RIA) &( I $ /3 C 6 _3 12$$ , FE) + .// *,/ (/M&6) Kime, 1993; Nagahama, ) * KP !/ 0$ 1 1# (M5 1$*3 .(1993 , 4 5 1&L % $ ( Fostier et al., 1983) Z % XY !1$*3 1 S % K$83 .(Kagawa et al., 1982) /( F(L E2 /3 1,= _3 1 $ * $ % 1$*[$*5 $ -* 1$*3 1 +iQj $ Q . /* *% P<b/be &B l@ t *) 12$$ , FE) Q* V* ./ /* 1% B N* ± S KD% V* o/bd±X/of $ ab/c±n/n ? 3*3 % /& +iQj /T $ + %* Q $ + , *32% 1 , FE) Q* 1 1$*3 /< 1$* 3 /< $ * * 1 2$$ 1 1 $ * Q V* ab/c±n/n " 3 S 2= -") %T r .+6 &B 4 V* b/e±b/Xo / $ *( % / Van ) ,= !(Scott et al., 1983) 1( %T /$ .(X -$/0) (P<b/be) + % * Q Pankhurst et ) 2$ !(derKraak et al., 1984 1 /< C @% / / " (Rinchard et al., 2001) H $ (al., 1986 ? 3*3 % / 1 $ " 3 , FE) Q* 1 /< 1 C @% /* I" *Q V* a/af±b/an $ o/bd±b/ed 1 2$$, F E ) Q * 1$*3 Z%XY 1 1" .(a -$/0) / *,/ $ . % * 1 2$$ 1 , *3 2% / % $ + *) 2% / $ * -* / 1% (Nagahama et al., 1987) 1C( %) + % % T / $ * $ % 1= /< 12$$ , FE) Q* 1$*3 2% 1" $ (* Q V* of/ad±e/X $ oe±f/ea ? 3*3 /Q "= +B6 *s3 F % /3 % *32% / 1 1= /< $ * 1$*[$*5 1 +iQj .(P<b/be) www.SID.ir Archive of SID ... ( – ) = w * % _ 3 % T ^ . " 3 " & = - C6 G % /% ,/W$* ./ * I" ( " (Berg, 1949) ./ 1[[$*5 / 1 % " $/ 8 #$ * 1 V * -*Z% XY 1 /< " r /% 8 $ E *<3 G 4 (3 2( . + * ) 2% / " 3 1, $ .(Abbasi et al., 2005) Blicca t*5 $ Alburnus alburnus $ $ * 1$*[$*5 1 /< " 3 1, -*Z%XY /< " bjoerkna (* Q V* , *() 5 / " 3 )% ( * Q V * c.o 3 b.f %) 2% / Labeo rohita /& \ %T ^ .+ % /& J"0 $ * ./ .(Suresh et al., 2008) /* I" " r /% $ Q* /&U 1T (3 % ( / - ?Qj 1$*[$*5 /< 1 2% 1" .(Rinchard et al., 1996) $ ( 4 " 6 % v $ * 2 0 3 F $ = , $ FR " 3 6 % 1 *S *R/ % $ /% *%*% f 4"6 " 3 F E ) W $ [ Kagawa et ) Carassius auratus MG 3 $ 1$*[$*5 4"6 ./ I/< Acheilognathus rhombea u&*% !(al., 1983 *CQ(L *% 1 $ / 4< *S% /3 H% !(Shimizu et al., 1985) / 1= < *j 4 < &'( $ 1/(3 $ (Prat et al., 1990) Dicentrarchus labrax 1$*[$*5 $/ `*G , (3 " (Rinchard et al., 1993) Gobio gobio .(Suresh et al., 2008) /% "3 Q* ./* I" -*Z %XY 1 /< 1% 2% % 03 % S % K*s3 1 *% $ $ $ * " 3 1, (3 #*% . 0$ (3 FC3 / $ / /&*6 2( !K" * r `EG Q* S( $ / / 1"( @% (3 V^ - 1 " 3 1, (3 (Q / 3 $ +6% B@ . /&% " 3 B6/&U v , $ + (3 " #*% . + 8 2(B " 3 $ (3 *@) B3 $ 1/(3 & r/ % "3 FD6 G $ / / /B K^ &T5 /B% B@ *% B@ F (C3 +0 $ Alburnus alburnus / .* $ a.e $/ ?3*3 % Blicca bjoerkna t*5 Alburnus . /^ -@% , $ + *( /&*6 +$$ / alburnus *#] ,,% $ *RC3 "* V* F&*5 , V^ - K/ % " 3 FD6 -M# * H/& $ H/& 1)= 0 / F % $ (Rinchard et al., 1996) + _ * ^ +0 % V* 1C( * $ 5U 2% / " 3 1, -*Z%XY/< ) = , & ' ( $ ` < 3 1 3 $ ?& B@ ^ % (Rinchard et al., 1997) /% ( +0 % ST,= V* H& CQ H/& ./& +<%@ * .* *CT3 *,/ FC3 S (Hliwa et al., 2002) 1C( $ Q I" 1"( *j v , 1/(3 B6 /&U 1 $* , + $ /( www.SID.ir Archive of SID 2 1 <7 &89: ; 4267 5 4 !3- 12 ! "#$ % &'* +,- &/0 ! "#$ " % (Vimba vimba) "# ! ± ) () %$ ( ) ( P</ /±/ /±/ /±/ /±/ /±/ /±/ P>/ /±/ /±/ /±/ #$%%"! ±/ /±/ /±/ P>/ /±/ /±/ /±/ &' /±/ /±/ /±/ ! "#$ " % (Alburnus chalcoides) ' & "# ! ± ) ( ) () %$ ( P</ /±/ /±/ /±/ /±/ ± /±/ P</ ±/ /±/ /±/ #$%%"! /±/ ± /±/ P>/ /±/ /±/ /±/ &' /±/ ± /±/ - Abdoli, A., Naderi, M., 2009. Biodiversity of the fishes of the southern basin of Caspian Sea. Abzian Publication, Tehran. 237 pp. - Abbasi, K., Keyvan, A., Ahmadi, M.R., 2005. Natural reproduction and determination of the spawning time and place of Vimba vimba persa pallas, 1814 in Sefidroud river Iranian Journal of Scientific Fisheries. 14: 113-126. - Berg, L.S., 1949. Freshwater fishes of U.S.S.R and adjacent countries, Vol: 2. Trady Institute Acad., Nauk, U.S.S.R., Translated to English in 1962. 469p. - Bogutskaya, N.G., 1997. Contribution to the knowledge of leuciscine fishes of Asia minol. Part 2. An annotated check-list of leuciscine fishes (leuciscinae, Cyprinidae) of Turkey with description of a new species and two new subspecies, Mitt. Hamb. Zool. Mus. Inst. 94, 161- 186. - Erdogan, O., Haliloglu, H. I., Ciltas, A.2002. Annual cycles of serum gonadal steroids and serum lipids in Capoeta capoeta umbla, Guldenstaedt, 1772 (Pisces: Cyprinidae). Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Science. 26: 1093-1096. - Fostier, A. & Jalabert, B., 1983. Steroidogenesis in rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) at various pre-ovulatory stages: Changes in plasma hormone levels and in vivo and in vitro responses of the ovary to salmon gonadotropine. Fish Physiology and Biochemistry, 2: 87-99. www.SID.ir Archive of SID ... ( – ) < - Hliwa, P., Demska-Zakes, K. & Martyniak, A., 2002. Annual ovarian cycle of Vimba vimba (L.) from the Drawieski national park in northwest Poland, Archives of Polish Fisheries, 10: 41-50. - Kagawa, H., Young, C, Adachi, S. & Nagahama, Y., 1982. Estradiol-17β production in amago salmon (Oncorhynchus rhodurus) ovarian follicles: Role of the thecal layer and granulose cells. General and Comparative Endocrinology, 47: 440-448. - Kagawa, H., Young, G. & Nagahama, Y., 1983. Changes in plasma steroid hormone levels during gonadal maturation in female goldfish (Carassius auratus), Bulletin of the Japanese Society of Science Fisheries, 49: 1783-1787. - Kime, D.E., 1993. Classical and non- classical reproductive steroids in fish. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 3, 160-180. - Lee, W.K. & Yang, S.W., 2002. Relationships between ovarian development and serum levels of gonadal steroid hormones, and induction of oocyte maturation and ovulation in the cultured female Korean spotted sea bass lateolabrax maculates (Jeomnong-eo), Aquaculture, 207: 169-183. - Lusk, S., Hanel, L. & Luskova, S., 2004. Red list of the ichthyofauna of the Czech Republic: Development
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Beyond Fish Edna Metabarcoding: Field Replicates Disproportionately Improve the Detection of Stream Associated Vertebrate Specie
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.26.437227; this version posted March 26, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. 1 2 3 Beyond fish eDNA metabarcoding: Field replicates 4 disproportionately improve the detection of stream 5 associated vertebrate species 6 7 8 9 Till-Hendrik Macher1, Robin Schütz1, Jens Arle2, Arne J. Beermann1,3, Jan 10 Koschorreck2, Florian Leese1,3 11 12 13 1 University of Duisburg-Essen, Aquatic Ecosystem Research, Universitätsstr. 5, 45141 Essen, 14 Germany 15 2German Environmental Agency, Wörlitzer Platz 1, 06844 Dessau-Roßlau, Germany 16 3University of Duisburg-Essen, Centre for Water and Environmental Research (ZWU), Universitätsstr. 17 3, 45141 Essen, Germany 18 19 20 21 22 Keywords: birds, biomonitoring, bycatch, conservation, environmental DNA, mammals 23 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.26.437227; this version posted March 26, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. 24 Abstract 25 Fast, reliable, and comprehensive biodiversity monitoring data are needed for 26 environmental decision making and management. Recent work on fish environmental 27 DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding shows that aquatic diversity can be captured fast, reliably, 28 and non-invasively at moderate costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Fish Edna Metabarcoding: Field Replicates Disproportionately Improve the Detection of Stream Associated Vertebrate Species
    Metabarcoding and Metagenomics 5: 59–71 DOI 10.3897/mbmg.5.66557 Research Article Beyond fish eDNA metabarcoding: Field replicates disproportionately improve the detection of stream associated vertebrate species Till-Hendrik Macher1, Robin Schütz1, Jens Arle2, Arne J. Beermann1,3, Jan Koschorreck2, Florian Leese1,3 1 University of Duisburg-Essen, Aquatic Ecosystem Research, Universitätsstr. 5, 45141 Essen, Germany 2 German Environment Agency, Wörlitzer Platz 1, 06844 Dessau-Roßlau, Germany 3 University of Duisburg-Essen, Centre for Water and Environmental Research (ZWU), Universitätsstr. 3, 45141 Essen, Germany Corresponding author: Till-Hendrik Macher ([email protected]) Academic editor: Pieter Boets | Received 26 March 2021 | Accepted 10 June 2021 | Published 13 July 2021 Abstract Fast, reliable, and comprehensive biodiversity monitoring data are needed for environmental decision making and management. Recent work on fish environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding shows that aquatic diversity can be captured fast, reliably, and non-invasively at moderate costs. Because water in a catchment flows to the lowest point in the landscape, often a stream, it can col- lect traces of terrestrial species via surface or subsurface runoff along its way or when specimens come into direct contact with water (e.g., when drinking). Thus, fish eDNA metabarcoding data can provide information on fish but also on other vertebrate species that live in riparian habitats. This additional data may offer a much more comprehensive approach for assessing vertebrate diversity at no additional costs. Studies on how the sampling strategy affects species detection especially of stream-associated communities, however, are scarce. We therefore performed an analysis on the effects of biological replication on both fish as well as (semi-)terrestrial species detection.
    [Show full text]
  • AHNELT H. 2008. Bestimmungsschlüssel Für Die In
    Ahnelt H. 2008 Bestimmungsschlüssel 1 BESTIMMUNGSSCHLÜSSEL FÜR DIE IN ÖSTERREICH VORKOMMENDEN FISCHE HARALD AHNELT Department für Theoretische Biologie, Fakultät für Lebenswissenschaften, Universität Wien, Althanstrasse 14, 1090 Wien [email protected] Online: 10 September 2008 Zitiervorschlag: Ahnelt H. 2008 Bestimmungsschlüssel für die in Österreich vorkommenden Fische. http://homepage.univie.ac.at/harald.ahnelt/Harald_Ahnelts_Homepage/Publications.html [Download-Datum] Bestimmungsschlüssel heimischer Fische Dieser Bestimmungsschlüssel ist für die Fischarten Österreichs ausgelegt. Merkmale und Merkmalskombinationen können daher bei Anwendung auf Fische anderer Länder zu nicht korrekten Ergebnissen führen. Identification key for Austrian freshwater fishes This identification key should only be used for fishes from Austrian freshwaters. This key will possibly not work for fishes from other European countries. Nobody is perfect – schon gar nicht ein Bestimmungsschlüssel. Ein Bestimmungsschlüssel baut auf charakteristischen Merkmalen auf, er vereinfacht und kann keinen Anspruch auf Vollständigkeit erheben. Auch dieser Bestimmungsschlüssel ist nur ein Versuch ein komplexes System in einen übersichtliche Form zu bringen. Die Natur sieht aber oft anders aus. Die Bandbreite an Merkmalen ist bei vielen Arten groß. Manche Populationen sind an unterschiedliche Umweltbedingungen angepasst und bilden unterscheidbare ökologische Formen. Andere Populationen sind isoliert und einige davon sind systematisch noch ungenügend erforscht. Möglicherweise taucht ja in Österreich noch die eine oder andere neue Art auf. Sollte es einmal nicht passen, oder wenn sich ein Fehler eingeschlichen hat, ersuche ich um Information - [email protected] oder unter obiger Adresse. Verbesserungsvorschläge und Ergänzungen sind willkommen. Ahnelt H. 2008 Bestimmungsschlüssel 2 Einleitung 1858 erschien das Buch „Die Süßwasserfische der Österreichischen Monarchie mit Rücksicht auf die angrenzenden Länder“, verfasst von den Österreichern Johann Jakob Heckel und Rudolf Kner.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of a Dispersal Barrier on Freshwater Migration of the Vimba Bream (Vimba Vimba)
    BOREAL ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH 23: 339–353 © 2018 ISSN 1797-2469 (online) Helsinki 18 December 2018 Effects of a dispersal barrier on freshwater migration of the vimba bream (Vimba vimba) Meelis Tambets1, Einar Kärgenberg1,2, Eva B. Thorstad3, Odd Terje Sandlund3, Finn Økland3 and Mart Thalfeldt1 1) Wildlife Estonia, Veski 4, EE-51005 Tartu, Estonia 2) Estonian Marine Institute, University of Tartu, Vanemuise 46, EE-51014 Tartu, Estonia 3) Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA), P.O. Box 5685, NO-7485 Trondheim, Norway Received 1 Aug. 2018, final version received 12 Dec. 2018, accepted 14 Nov. 2018 Tambets M., Kärgenberg E., Thorstad E.B., Sandlund O.T., Økland F. & Thalfeldt M. 2018: Effects of a dispersal barrier on freshwater migration of the vimba bream (Vimba vimba). Boreal Env. Res. 23: 339–353. To study the effects of a dispersal barrier on migration of the semi-anadromous vimba bream in the Pärnu River, Estonia, we tagged thirty fish with acoustic transmitters and released above the barrier. Tagged fish showed variation in behaviour, and 16 different spawning movement patterns were identified. Several fish moved > 25 km upstream. Batch spawning was suggested by stops in up to four different spawning areas. The fish descended to the sea after spawning in spring; females earlier than males. After spending on average 137 days in the sea, they returned to the river during autumn and stayed in the river on average 174 days until the next spawning. The fish were most active during sunrise and sunset. In conclusion, the study shows that the dam prevents a diversification of migra- tion behaviour and the associated expansion of spawning areas.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ichthyofauna of Gediz River (Turkey): Taxonomic and Zoogeographic Features
    Annual Research & Review in Biology 6(3): 202-214, 2015, Article no.ARRB.2015.079 ISSN: 2347-565X SCIENCEDOMAIN international www.sciencedomain.org The Ichthyofauna of Gediz River (Turkey): Taxonomic and Zoogeographic Features Salim Serkan Güçlü1* and Fahrettin Küçük1 1Faculty of Eğirdir Fisheries, Süleyman Demirel University, Eastern Campus, Isparta, Turkey. Authors’ contributions This work was carried out in collaboration between all authors. Author SSG designed the study, wrote the protocol and interpreted the data. Authors SSG and FK anchored the field study, gathered the initial data and performed preliminary data analysis. Authors while SSG and FK managed the literature searches and produced the initial draft. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Article Information DOI: 10.9734/ARRB/2015/14889 Editor(s): (1) George Perry, Dean and Professor of Biology, University of Texas at San Antonio, USA. Reviewers: (1) Anonymous, Nigeria. (2) Anonymous, Italy. (3) Anonymous, India. (4) Anonymous, Turkey. Complete Peer review History: http://www.sciencedomain.org/review-history.php?iid=798&id=32&aid=7619 Received 27th October 2014 th Original Research Article Accepted 17 December 2014 Published 5th January 2015 ABSTRACT Aims: This study was carried out to determine the fish fauna in the Gediz River and by comparing the fish fauna with that of neighboring basins from a zoogeographical point of view. Place and Duration of Study: In order to establish the taxonomic and zoogeographic features of the fish fauna of the Gediz River Basin (Turkey), fish samples were collected using elektrofishing equipment gill nets trammel nets, seine nets and cast nets from June 2010 to July 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • FAMILY Leuciscidae Bonaparte, 1835 - Chubs, Daces, True Minnows, Roaches, Shiners, Etc
    FAMILY Leuciscidae Bonaparte, 1835 - chubs, daces, true minnows, roaches, shiners, etc. SUBFAMILY Leuciscinae Bonaparte, 1835 - chubs, daces, trueminnows [=Leuciscini, Scardinii, ?Brachyentri, ?Pachychilae, Chondrostomi, Alburini, Pogonichthyi, Abramiformes, ?Paralabeonini, Cochlognathi, Laviniae, Phoxini, Acanthobramae, Bramae, Aspii, Gardonini, Cochlobori, Coelophori, Epicysti, Mesocysti, Plagopterinae, Campostominae, Exoglossinae, Graodontinae, Acrochili, Orthodontes, Chrosomi, Hybognathi, Tiarogae, Luxili, Ericymbae, Phenacobii, Rhinichthyes, Ceratichthyes, Mylochili, Mylopharodontes, Peleci, Medinae, Pimephalinae, Notropinae, Pseudaspinini] GENUS Abramis Cuvier, 1816 - breams [=Brama K, Brama W, Brama B, Leucabramis, Sapa, Zopa] Species Abramis ballerus (Linnaeus, 1758) - ballerus bream [=farenus] Species Abramis brama (Linnaeus, 1758) - bream, freshwater bream, bronze bream [=argyreus, bergi, danubii, gehini, latus, major, melaenus, orientalis, sinegorensis, vetula, vulgaris] GENUS Acanthobrama Heckel, 1843 - bleaks [=Acanthalburnus, Culticula, Trachybrama] Species Acanthobrama centisquama Heckel, 1843 - Damascus bleak Species Acanthobrama hadiyahensis Coad, et al., 1983 - Hadiyah bleak Species Acanthobrama lissneri Tortonese, 1952 - Tiberias bleak [=oligolepis] Species Acanthobrama marmid Heckel, 1843 - marmid bleak [=arrhada, cupida, elata] Species Acanthobrama microlepis (De Filippi, 1863) - Kura bleak [=punctulatus] Species Acanthobrama orontis Berg, 1949 - Antioch bleak Species Acanthobrama persidis (Coad, 1981) - Shur bleak
    [Show full text]
  • State of Lake Minnow, Eupallasella Percnurus (Pall.), Gonads During Pre-Spawning Season – Preliminary Results
    Arch. Pol. Fish. (2011) 19: 137-143 DOI 10.2478/v10086-011-0017-4 RESEARCH ARTICLE State of lake minnow, Eupallasella percnurus (Pall.), gonads during pre-spawning season – preliminary results Received – 05 July 2011/Accepted – 30 August 2011. Published online: 30 September 2011; ©Inland Fisheries Institute in Olsztyn, Poland Piotr Hliwa, Jacek Wolnicki, Jaros³aw Król, Justyna Sikorska, Rafa³ Kamiñski, Andrzej Ciereszko Abstract. Active protection measures towards the population gonads. The cross-sections of E. percnurus testes revealed the of lake minnow, Eupallasella percnurus (Pall.), require dominance of germ cells characteristic of the final cytological comprehensive studies on the reproduction biology of this stages of spermatogenesis in the central part of seminal endangered representative of the native ichthyofauna. One of ampullae, i.e. spermatids and spermatozoids. Along their edges the key issues is the analysis of the reproduction cycle of – free spaces reflecting the loosened structure of gonads sexually mature individuals, which enables the explicit occurred. At the borderline between the adjacent ampullae, determination of the time and the course of natural spawning. single spermatogonia were visible, as well as seminal ampullae The first attempt at investigating this issue was undertaken in filled up with primary and secondary spermatocytes, which May 2009. Gonads of six E. percnurus specimens (3 males and potentially ensure the spawning readiness of male E. percnurus 3 females) were histologically evaluated. The fishes with the for a longer period. mean body length of 4.9 cm (the range 3.3-6.1 cm) and the mean body weight of 3.1 g (the range 0.8-6.2 g) were caught in Keywords: lake minnow, ovaries, testes, pre-spawning the reservoir in Zielonka (Mazowieckie Voivodeship).
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships and Biogeographical Patterns in Circum
    Perea et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2010, 10:265 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/10/265 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Phylogenetic relationships and biogeographical patterns in Circum-Mediterranean subfamily Leuciscinae (Teleostei, Cyprinidae) inferred from both mitochondrial and nuclear data Silvia Perea1*, Madelaine Böhme2, Primož Zupančič3, Jörg Freyhof4, Radek Šanda5, Müfit Özuluğ6, Asghar Abdoli7, Ignacio Doadrio1 Abstract Background: Leuciscinae is a subfamily belonging to the Cyprinidae fish family that is widely distributed in Circum-Mediterranean region. Many efforts have been carried out to deciphering the evolutionary history of this group. Thus, different biogeographical scenarios have tried to explain the colonization of Europe and Mediterranean area by cyprinids, such as the “north dispersal” or the “Lago Mare dispersal” models. Most recently, Pleistocene glaciations influenced the distribution of leuciscins, especially in North and Central Europe. Weighing up these biogeographical scenarios, this paper constitutes not only the first attempt at deciphering the mitochondrial and nuclear relationships of Mediterranean leuciscins but also a test of biogeographical hypotheses that could have determined the current distribution of Circum-Mediterranean leuciscins. Results: A total of 4439 characters (mitochondrial + nuclear) from 321 individuals of 176 leuciscine species rendered a well-supported phylogeny, showing fourteen main lineages. Analyses of independent mitochondrial and nuclear markers supported the same main lineages, but basal relationships were not concordant. Moreover, some incongruence was found among independent mitochondrial and nuclear phylogenies. The monophyly of some poorly known genera such as Pseudophoxinus and Petroleuciscus was rejected. Representatives of both genera belong to different evolutionary lineages. Timing of cladogenetic events among the main leuciscine lineages was gained using mitochondrial and all genes data set.
    [Show full text]
  • Bringing Back a Fish Collection to Life
    Turkish Journal of Bioscience and Collections Volume 5, Number 1, 2021 E-ISSN: 2601-4292 RESEARCH ARTICLE In Memory of Fahire Battalgazi; Bringing Back a Fish Collection to Life Özcan Gaygusuz1 , Müfit Özuluğ2 , Çiğdem Gürsoy Gaygusuz3 , Zeynep Dorak1 , Gülşah Saç1 Elif Ece Serezli4 Abstract Istanbul University (I.U.) plays an important role in handing down the valuable to the next generations by protecting its scientific and cultural assets with the museums it possesses. 1 Istanbul University, Faculty of Aquatic Fish collection have inherited from I.U. Hydrobiology Institute to I.U. Faculty of Aquatic Sciences, Department of Marine and Sciences and preserved until today in I.U. Faculty of Aquatic Sciences, Inland Fisheries Freshwater Resources Management, İstanbul, Turkey Production and Research Unit located in Sapanca (Sakarya, Turkey). In course of time, 2Istanbul University, Faculty of Science, the protective liquid of fish material has begun to evaporate from the jars; or they have Department of Biology, Istanbul, Turkey somehow lost their efficiency in protection. For this reason, it was aimed to recover this 3 Trakya University, Keşan Vocational High collection, which contains rare samples from Turkish seas and freshwater habitats, to School, Edirne, Turkey update the jar labels, and to replenish the preservative fluids. During this venture, we 4Istanbul University, Institute of Graduate Studies in Science and Engineering, came across some fish samples that were collected and examined by Prof. Dr. Fahire Istanbul, Turkey Battalgazi, the first Turkish woman ichthyologist, who occupies an important position in the history of science of Turkey. Here, we introduce the fish species (Alburnus kotschyi, ORCID: Ö.G.
    [Show full text]
  • Silver Bream (Blicca Bjoerkna) ERSS
    Silver Bream (Blicca bjoerkna) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, March 2014 Revised, February 2018 Web Version, 8/30/2018 Photo: A. Harka. Licensed under Creative Commons (CC-BY 3.0). Available: http://www.fishbase.org/photos/ThumbnailsSummary.php?Genus=Blicca&Species=bjoerkna# (February 2018). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Froese and Pauly (2017): “Europe and Asia: North, Baltic, White, Black (south to Rioni drainage) and Caspian Sea basins, Atlantic basin southward to Adour drainage (France; possibly introduced southward of Loire) and Mediterranean basin in France (Hérault and Rhône drainages). In Aral, Marmara and Anatolian Black Sea basins west of Ankara. Naturally absent from Iberian Peninsula, Italy, 1 Adriatic basin, Crimea, Great Britain (except southeast), Scandinavia north of Sundsvall (Sweden) and 65° N (Finland).” Status in the United States This species has not been reported in the United States. Means of Introductions in the United States This species has not been reported in the United States. 2 Biology and Ecology Taxonomic Hierarchy and Taxonomic Standing From ITIS (2018): “Kingdom Animalia Subkingdom Bilateria Infrakingdom Deuterostomia Phylum Chordata Subphylum Vertebrata Infraphylum Gnathostomata Superclass Osteichthyes Class Actinopterygii Subclass Neopterygii Infraclass Teleostei Superorder Ostariophysi Order Cypriniformes Superfamily Cyprinoidea Family Cyprinidae Genus Blicca Species Blicca bjoerkna” “Taxonomic Status: valid” Size, Weight, and Age Range From Froese and Pauly (2017): […] Max length : 36.0 cm TL male/unsexed; [Gerstmeier and Romig 1998]; common length : 20.0 cm TL male/unsexed; [Muus and Dahlström 1968]; max. published weight: 1.0 kg [Billard 1997]” 2 Environment From Froese and Pauly (2017): “Freshwater; brackish; demersal; potamodromous [Riede 2004]; depth range 0 - ? m.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyprinidae: Leuciscinae) in Turkey
    Iran. J. Ichthyol. (June 2014), 1(2): 96–105 Received: February 28, 2014 © 2014 Iranian Society of Ichthyology Accepted: June 10, 2014 E-ISSN: 2383-0964 ; P-ISSN: 2383-1561 doi: http://www.ichthyol.ir The systematic position of Acanthalburnus microlepis (De Filippi, 1863) and contributions to the genus Acanthobrama (Cyprinidae: Leuciscinae) in Turkey Fahrettin KÜÇÜK1*, Yusuf BEKTAŞ2, Salim Serkan GÜÇLÜ1, Cüneyt KAYA2 1Süleyman Demirel University, Eğirdir Fisheries Faculty, Eastern Campus, Isparta-Turkey 2Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Fisheries Faculty, Rize-Turkey Email: [email protected] Abstract: In this study, the systematic position of Acanthalburnus microlepis from Kura and Aras basins is clarified and some notes on the taxonomy of the Acanthobrama species distributed in Turkey are given. Based on the morphological and osteological analyses, a high similarity between A. microlepis and Acanthobrama members is found. Some taxonomic information yielded from the examination of recent collections from Dicle (Tigris), Fırat (Euphrates), Asi (Orontes), Ceyhan, Seyhan rivers and Berdan Stream near Tarsus is also included. Accordingly, Acanthobrama marmid is distributed only in Dicle-Fırat system (presumably also in Sinnap Stream from Kuveik Drainage) and the populations from Asi, Seyhan and Berdan Stream (Tarsus) regarded as a separate subspecies as A. marmid orontis Berg, 1949 should be considered full species according to phylogenetic species concept and Ceyhan population represents a new species. Keywords: Acanthalburnus, Acanthobrama,
    [Show full text]
  • Cyprinids in Estonian Small Lakes: Comparison Between Main Water Basins
    Cyprinids in Estonian Small Lakes: Comparison between Main Water Basins Anu Palm (1) amd Teet Krause (1), Ain Järvalt(1), Maidu Silm (1) (1) Estonian University for Life Sciences, Centre for Limnology at PKI, Tartu, Estonia Abstract In last 16 years, we sampled slightly over a hundred small lakes in Estonia with Nordic type of multimesh gillnets for cyprinids. We captured 15 cyprinid species out of 18 considered as natural of origin in Estonian inland waters. Rheophilic riffle minnow (Alburnoides bipunctatus) and minnow (Phoxinus phoxinus) in addition to stocked carp (Cyprinus carpio) never occurred in samples, whereas vimba bream (Vimba vimba) and piscivorous asp (Aspius aspius) occurred twice. Extremely rare in samples were also chub (Leuciscus cephalus), gudgeon (Gobio gobio), dace (L. leuciscus), and ide (L. idus). The gibel carp (Carassius gibelio), crussian carp (Carassius carassius), and tench (Tinca tinca) were caught mostly in coastal and closed lakes. Open lakes with in- and outlet were preferred by bream (Abramis brama), bleak (Alburnus alburnus), and white bream (Blicca bjoerkna). Numbers of cyprinid species co-increased with the numbers of individuals in a sample both either water basins or lake types along the water course were compared; coastal lakes were the only exception. We consider the ratio numbers of cyprinid individuals per cyprinid species to indicate directly the pressure of piscivory and hence indirectly the quality of lake water. Keywords: Cyprinidae, lake type, multimesh gill net, water quality Introduction The fish distribution of Northern Europe is described as a outcome of postglacial dispersal (Mooi, Gill, 2002) in the long-lasting processes of retreat southwards by ice formation and recolonization of ice- free areas (Paaver, Lõugas, 2003).
    [Show full text]