Functional Characterization of the 5-Oxo-ETE Receptor OXE-R and Identification of the First Small Molecule Antagonist with a Novel Mechanism of Ligand Bias

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Functional Characterization of the 5-Oxo-ETE Receptor OXE-R and Identification of the First Small Molecule Antagonist with a Novel Mechanism of Ligand Bias Functional characterization of the 5-oxo-ETE receptor OXE-R and identification of the first small molecule antagonist with a novel mechanism of ligand bias Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades (Dr. rer. nat.) der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn vorgelegt von Stefanie Blättermann aus Düsseldorf Bonn 2011 Angefertigt mit Genehmigung der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms Universität Bonn. 1. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Evi Kostenis 2. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Klaus Mohr Tag der Promotion: 07.10.2011 Erscheinungsjahr: 2011 Die vorliegende Arbeit wurde in der Zeit von Oktober 2006 bis November 2010 am Institut für Pharmazeutische Biologie der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms Universität Bonn unter der Leitung von Frau Prof. Dr. Evi Kostenis durchgeführt. Meinen Eltern Index I Index Index .................................................................................................................................. I 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 1 1.1 G protein coupled receptors ............................................................................... 1 1.2 G proteins ........................................................................................................... 2 1.3 GPCR signaling ................................................................................................. 3 1.4 5-oxo-eicosatetraenioc acid ............................................................................... 4 1.5 5-oxo-ETE receptor ........................................................................................... 6 1.6 Aim of this work ................................................................................................ 7 2 Material and methods ............................................................................................... 9 2.1 Material .............................................................................................................. 9 2.1.1 Chemicals, enzymes and reagents ......................................................... 9 2.1.2 Kits ....................................................................................................... 11 2.1.3 Devices ................................................................................................. 11 2.1.4 Buffers and solutions ........................................................................... 12 2.1.5 Consumables ........................................................................................ 16 2.1.6 Software ............................................................................................... 17 2.1.7 Bacteria ................................................................................................ 18 2.1.8 Vectors ................................................................................................. 18 2.1.9 Mammalian cell lines ........................................................................... 19 2.2 Methods ........................................................................................................... 20 2.2.1 Molecular biology protocols ................................................................ 20 2.2.2 Cell culture protocols ........................................................................... 22 2.2.3 Cell based assays ................................................................................. 28 2.2.4 Computational modeling ...................................................................... 35 3 Results ...................................................................................................................... 37 3.1 OXE-R antagonist screening in calcium mobilization assays ......................... 37 3.1.1 Determination of calcium mobilization capabilities of the OXE-R in HEK293 cells ................................................................................... 37 3.1.2 OXE-R antagonist screening of a compound library in calcium mobilization assays .............................................................................. 39 3.1.3 Elucidation of unspecific cellular effects of Gü 1157 and Gü 1158 .... 40 3.1.4 Computational modeling of compounds with antagonistic activity on the OXE-R devoid of unspecific cellular effects ............................ 41 3.1.5 OXE-R antagonist screening of compounds derived from fragment based synthesis of compound 11852816 .............................. 45 3.1.6 Characterization of the nature of antagonism of Gü 1157, Gü 1158 and Gü 1654 in calcium mobilization assays ....................................... 46 II Index 3.1.7 Discussion ............................................................................................ 47 3.2 Investigations of antagonistic activity of Gü 1157, Gü 1158 and Gü 1654 on the OXE-R Gi pathway in cAMP accumulation assays .............................. 49 3.2.1 Determination of Gi signaling of the OXE-R by cAMP accumulation assays ............................................................................. 49 3.2.2 Analysis of antagonistic activity of Gü 1157, Gü 1158 and Gü 1654 on the Gi pathway of the OXE-R ................................................. 50 3.2.3 Discussion ............................................................................................ 51 3.3 Investigations of the biased antagonism of Gü 1157, Gü 1158 and Gü 1654 on the OXE-R using DMR assays ........................................................... 54 3.3.1 Visualization of isolated OXE-R G16 signaling in DMR assays .......... 55 3.3.2 Investigations of the antagonism of Gü 1157, Gü 1158 and Gü 1654 on the G16 pathway of the OXE-R in DMR assays ..................... 56 3.3.3 Analysis of antagonistic activity of Gü 1654 on the Gi pathway of the OXE-R in DMR assays ........................................... 58 3.3.4 Analysis of specific antagonism of Gü 1654 on the G16 pathway of the OXE-R ........................................................................ 58 3.3.5 Discussion ............................................................................................ 60 3.4 Investigations of OXE-R β-Arrestin recruitment ............................................. 63 3.4.1 Investigations of OXE-R β-Arrestin recruitment ................................. 64 3.4.2 Investigations of antagonistic activity of Gü 1157, Gü 1158 and Gü 1654 on OXE-R β-Arrestin2 recruitment ....................................... 65 3.4.3 Investigations of the pharmacology of the OXE-R fused to Rluc in DMR assays .......................................................................................... 66 3.4.4 Investigations of OXE-R specific inhibition of β-Arrestin recruitment by Gü 1654 ........................................................................ 66 3.4.5 Discussion ............................................................................................ 67 3.5 Investigations of antagonistic activity of Gü 1654 on OXE-R signaling in human primary cells ......................................................................................... 70 3.5.1 Investigations of antagonistic activity of Gü 1654 on the OXE-R in neutrophil DMR assays ...................................................... 71 3.5.2 Analysis of Gü 1654 on Gi-mediated signaling of the OXE-R in human primary cells ............................................................................. 78 3.5.3 Discussion ............................................................................................ 84 4 Final discussion ........................................................................................................ 89 5 Summary .................................................................................................................. 95 6 Abbreviations ........................................................................................................... 97 7 Literature ................................................................................................................. 99 8 Appendix ................................................................................................................ 113 Publications .................................................................................................................. 119 Curriculum vitae ......................................................................................................... 121 Index III Erklärung .................................................................................................................... 123 Acknowledgments ....................................................................................................... 125 1 Introduction 1 1 Introduction 1.1 G protein coupled receptors G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are signaling proteins which are found on the cell surface and transduce signals from outside the cell to the inside of a cell, thus allowing communication between cells, tissues and organs by responding to a wide range of modulators, such as hormones, neurotransmitters, lipids, peptides, nucleotides, ions and photons (Gether and Kobilka, 1998; Lagerström et al., 2008). With about 800 receptors, GPCRs represent the largest gene family in the mammalian genome, and, as widely expressed in the human body, GPCRs are involved in a vast range of physiologic and pathologic processes relying on cell signaling (Lundstrom, 2006). Related to their involvement
Recommended publications
  • Regulation of Immune Cells by Eicosanoid Receptors
    Regulation of Immune Cells by Eicosanoid Receptors The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Kim, Nancy D., and Andrew D. Luster. 2007. “Regulation of Immune Cells by Eicosanoid Receptors.” The Scientific World Journal 7 (1): 1307-1328. doi:10.1100/tsw.2007.181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/ tsw.2007.181. Published Version doi:10.1100/tsw.2007.181 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:37298366 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Review Article Special Issue: Eicosanoid Receptors and Inflammation TheScientificWorldJOURNAL (2007) 7, 1307–1328 ISSN 1537-744X; DOI 10.1100/tsw.2007.181 Regulation of Immune Cells by Eicosanoid Receptors Nancy D. Kim and Andrew D. Luster* Center for Immunology and Inflammatory Diseases, Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston E-mail: [email protected] Received March 13, 2007; Revised June 14, 2007; Accepted July 2, 2007; Published September 1, 2007 Eicosanoids are potent, bioactive, lipid mediators that regulate important components of the immune response, including defense against infection, ischemia, and injury, as well as instigating and perpetuating autoimmune and inflammatory conditions. Although these lipids have numerous effects on diverse cell types and organs, a greater understanding of their specific effects on key players of the immune system has been gained in recent years through the characterization of individual eicosanoid receptors, the identification and development of specific receptor agonists and inhibitors, and the generation of mice genetically deficient in various eicosanoid receptors.
    [Show full text]
  • Involvement of Microsomal Prostaglandin E Synthase-1-Derived Prostaglandin E2 in Chemical-Induced Carcinogenesis Shuntaro Hara (Showa University, Tokyo, Japan)
    Book of Abstracts Thursday, October 23th SESSION 1: PGE2 in PATHOPHYSIOLOGY SESSION 2: PROSTAGLANDINS and CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM SESSION 3: NOVEL LIPID MEDIATORS and ADVANCES in LIPID MEDIATOR ANALYTICS Friday, October 24th YOUNG INVESTIGATOR SESSION SESSION 4: LIPOXYGENASES SESSION 5: ADIPOSE TISSUE and BIOACTIVE LIPIDS GOLD SPONSORS http://workshop-lipid.eu MAJOR SPONSORS 1 SPONSORS 2 SCIENTIFIC AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Gerard BANNENBERG Global Organization for EPA and DHA (GOED), Madrid, Spain E-mail: [email protected] Joan CLÀRIA Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics Hospital Clínic/IDIBAPS Villarroel 170 08036 Barcelona, Spain E-mail: [email protected] Per-Johan JAKOBSSON Karolinska Institutet Dept of Medicine 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden E-mail: [email protected] Jane A. MITCHELL NHLI, Imperial College, London SW3 6LY, United Kingdom E-mail: [email protected] Xavier NOREL INSERM U1148, Bichat Hospital 46, rue Henri Huchard 75018 Paris, France E-mail: [email protected] Dieter STEINHILBER Institut fuer Pharmazeutische Chemie Universitaet Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany E-mail: [email protected] Gökçe TOPAL Istanbul University Faculty of Pharmacy Department of Pharmacology Beyazit, 34116, Istanbul, Turkey E-mail: [email protected] Sönmez UYDEŞ DOGAN Istanbul University, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacology Beyazit, 34116, Istanbul, Turkey E-mail: [email protected] Tim WARNER The William Harvey Research Institute Barts& the London School of Medicine & Dentistry, United
    [Show full text]
  • Hematopoietic Prostaglandin D2 Synthase Controls the Onset And
    Hematopoietic prostaglandin D2 synthase controls SEE COMMENTARY the onset and resolution of acute inflammation 12–14 through PGD2 and 15-deoxy⌬ PGJ2 Ravindra Rajakariar*, Mark Hilliard†, Toby Lawrence‡, Seema Trivedi§, Paul Colville-Nash¶, Geoff Bellinganʈ, Desmond Fitzgerald†, Muhammad M. Yaqoob*, and Derek W. Gilroy**†† *Department of Experimental Medicine, Nephrology, and Critical Care, William Harvey Research Institute, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, United Kingdom; †Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland; ‡Institute of Cancer, Centre for Translational Oncology, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, United Kingdom; §Leukocyte Biology Section, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom; ¶St. Helier Hospital, Carshalton, Surrey SM5 1AA, United Kingdom; ʈCritical Care, Maples Bridge Link, Podium 3, University College London Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU, United Kingdom; and **Centre for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Division of Medicine, 5 University Street, University College London, London WC1E 6JJ, United Kingdom Edited by Charles Serhan, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, and accepted by the Editorial Board October 21, 2007 (received for review August 6, 2007) Hematopoietic prostaglandin D2 synthase (hPGD2S) metabolizes inflammation (6–8). Although controversial, it is believed that 12–14 cyclooxygenase (COX)-derived PGH2 to PGD2 and 15-deoxy⌬ PGD2 is initially converted to PGJ2 and 15-deoxy-PGD2 (15d- PGJ2 (15d-PGJ2). Unlike COX, the role of hPGD2S in host defense is PGD2) in an albumin-independent manner. Thereafter, the cyclo- 12, 14 ambiguous. PGD2 can be either pro- or antiinflammatory depend- pentenone PGs (cyPGs) 15-deoxy-⌬ -PGJ2 (15d-PGJ2) and 12 ing on disease etiology, whereas the existence of 15d-PGJ2 and its ⌬ -PGJ2 are generated from PGJ2 by albumin-independent and relevance to pathophysiology remain controversial.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal Pre-Proof
    Journal Pre-proof Carcinogenesis: Failure of resolution of inflammation? Anna Fishbein, Bruce D. Hammock, Charles N. Serhan, Dipak Panigrahy PII: S0163-7258(20)30200-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2020.107670 Reference: JPT 107670 To appear in: Pharmacology and Therapeutics Please cite this article as: A. Fishbein, B.D. Hammock, C.N. Serhan, et al., Carcinogenesis: Failure of resolution of inflammation?, Pharmacology and Therapeutics (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2020.107670 This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2020 Published by Elsevier. Journal Pre-proof P&T #23794 Carcinogenesis: Failure of Resolution of Inflammation? Anna Fishbein1,2*, Bruce D. Hammock3, Charles N. Serhan4#, Dipak Panigrahy1,2# 1Center for Vascular Biology Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215 2Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215 3Department of Entomology and Nematology, and UCD Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Davis, CA 95616 4Center for Experimental Therapeutics and Reperfusion Injury, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women‟s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA Journal Pre-proof #contributed equally *To whom correspondence may be addressed: Anna Fishbein: [email protected] 99 Brookline Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantitative Metabolic Profiling of Lipid Mediators
    Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2013, 57, 1359–1377 DOI 10.1002/mnfr.201200840 1359 REVIEW Quantitative metabolic profiling of lipid mediators David Balgoma, Antonio Checa, Daniel Garcıa´ Sar, Stuart Snowden and Craig E. Wheelock Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Division of Physiological Chemistry II, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden Lipids are heterogeneous biological molecules that possess multiple physiological roles in- Received: December 19, 2012 cluding cell structure, homeostasis, and restoration of tissue functionality during and after Revised: May 7, 2013 Accepted: May 8, 2013 inflammation. Lipid metabolism constitutes a network of pathways that are related at multiple biosynthetic hubs. Disregulation of lipid metabolism can lead to pathophysiological effects and multiple lipid mediators have been described to be involved in physiological processes, (e.g. inflammation). Accordingly, a thorough description of these pathways may shed light on putative relations in multiple complex diseases, including chronic obstructive pulmonary dis- ease, asthma, Alzheimer’s disease, multiple sclerosis, obesity, and cancer. Due to the structural complexity of lipids and the low abundance of many lipid mediators, mass spectrometry is the most commonly employed method for analysis. However, multiple challenges remain in the efforts to analyze every lipid subfamily. In this review, the biological role of sphingolipids, glyc- erolipids, oxylipins (e.g. eicosanoids), endocannabinoids, and N-acylethanolamines in relation to health and disease and the state-of-the-art analyses are summarized. The characterization and understanding of these pathways will increase our ability to examine for interrelations among lipid pathways and improve the knowledge of biological mechanisms in health and disease. Keywords: Disease / Inflammation / Lipidomics / Lipids / MS 1 Introduction Correspondence: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Binding of Androgen- and Estrogen-Like Flavonoids to Their Cognate (Non)Nuclear Receptors: a Comparison by Computational Prediction
    molecules Article Binding of Androgen- and Estrogen-Like Flavonoids to Their Cognate (Non)Nuclear Receptors: A Comparison by Computational Prediction Giulia D’Arrigo 1, Eleonora Gianquinto 1, Giulia Rossetti 2,3,4 , Gabriele Cruciani 5, Stefano Lorenzetti 6,* and Francesca Spyrakis 1,* 1 Department of Drug Science and Technology, University of Turin, Via Giuria 9, 10125 Turin, Italy; [email protected] (G.D.); [email protected] (E.G.) 2 Institute for Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-9) and Institute for Advanced Simulations (IAS-5) “Computational Biomedicine”, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany 3 Jülich Supercomputing Center (JSC), Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany 4 Department of Neurology, RWTH, Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany; [email protected] 5 Department of Chemistry, Biology and Biotechnology, University of Perugia, 06123 Perugia, Italy; [email protected] 6 Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS), Department of Food Safety, Nutrition and Veterinary Public Health, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected] (S.L.); [email protected] (F.S.) Abstract: Flavonoids are plant bioactives that are recognized as hormone-like polyphenols because of Citation: D’Arrigo, G.; Gianquinto, their similarity to the endogenous sex steroids 17β-estradiol and testosterone, and to their estrogen- E.; Rossetti, G.; Cruciani, G.; and androgen-like activity. Most efforts to verify flavonoid binding to nuclear receptors (NRs) and Lorenzetti, S.; Spyrakis, F. Binding of explain their action have been focused on ERα, while less attention has been paid to other nuclear Androgen- and Estrogen-Like and non-nuclear membrane androgen and estrogen receptors. Here, we investigate six flavonoids Flavonoids to Their Cognate (apigenin, genistein, luteolin, naringenin, quercetin, and resveratrol) that are widely present in fruits (Non)Nuclear Receptors: A and vegetables, and often used as replacement therapy in menopause.
    [Show full text]
  • 15-Keto-Prostaglandin E₂ Activates Host Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/113167; this version posted January 23, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 15-keto-prostaglandin E₂ activates host peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor 2 gamma (PPAR-γ) to promote Cryptococcus neoformans growth during infection. 3 4 Authors: 5 Robert J. Evans1,2, Katherine Pline1,2, Catherine A. Loynes 1,2, Sarah Needs3, Maceler 4 5 3 6 6 6 Aldrovandi , Jens Tiefenbach , Ewa Bielska , Rachel E. Rubino , Christopher J. Nicol , 7 Robin C. May3, Henry M. Krause5, Valerie B. O’Donnell4, Stephen A. Renshaw1,2, Simon A. 8 Johnston1,2 9 10 1 Bateson Centre, Firth Court, University of Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK. 11 2 Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, Medical School, University of 12 Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK. 13 3 Institute of Microbiology and Infection, School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, 14 Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. 15 4 Systems Immunity Research Institute, and Division of Infection and Immunity, School of 16 Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF14 4XN, UK 17 5 Banting and Best Department of Medical Research, The Terrence Donnelly Centre for Cellular 18 and Biomolecular Research (CCBR), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, InDanio 19 Bioscience Inc., Toronto, Ontario, Canada 20 6 Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada. 21 22 Running Title: Fungal derived 15-keto-prostaglandin E2 and PPAR- promote C.
    [Show full text]
  • Oxygenated Fatty Acids Enhance Hematopoiesis Via the Receptor GPR132
    Oxygenated Fatty Acids Enhance Hematopoiesis via the Receptor GPR132 The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Lahvic, Jamie L. 2017. Oxygenated Fatty Acids Enhance Hematopoiesis via the Receptor GPR132. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Graduate School of Arts & Sciences. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:42061504 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Oxygenated Fatty Acids Enhance Hematopoiesis via the Receptor GPR132 A dissertation presented by Jamie L. Lahvic to The Division of Medical Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of Developmental and Regenerative Biology Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts May 2017 © 2017 Jamie L. Lahvic All rights reserved. Dissertation Advisor: Leonard I. Zon Jamie L. Lahvic Oxygenated Fatty Acids Enhance Hematopoiesis via the Receptor GPR132 Abstract After their specification in early development, hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) maintain the entire blood system throughout adulthood as well as upon transplantation. The processes of HSC specification, renewal, and homing to the niche are regulated by protein, as well as lipid signaling molecules. A screen for chemical enhancers of marrow transplant in the zebrafish identified the endogenous lipid signaling molecule 11,12-epoxyeicosatrienoic acid (11,12-EET). EET has vasodilatory properties, but had no previously described function on HSCs.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Prostaglandin D2 and the Dpi and Dp2 Receptors
    EFFECTS OF PROSTAGLANDIN D2 AND THE DPI AND DP2 RECEPTORS IN EOSINOPHIL RECRUITMENT INTO THE BROWN NORWAY RAT LUNGS Wagdi Almishri Department of Pathology McGill University Montreal, Canada December 2004 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Science © Wagdi Walmishri 2004 Library and Bibliothèque et 1+1 Archives Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de l'édition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A ON4 Ottawa ON K1A ON4 Canada Canada Your file Votre référence ISBN: 0-494-12387-7 Our file Notre référence ISBN: 0-494-12387-7 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library permettant à la Bibliothèque et Archives and Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par télécommunication ou par l'Internet, prêter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des thèses partout dans loan, distribute and sell th es es le monde, à des fins commerciales ou autres, worldwide, for commercial or non­ sur support microforme, papier, électronique commercial purposes, in microform, et/ou autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriété du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in et des droits moraux qui protège cette thèse. this thesis. Neither the thesis Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels de nor substantial extracts from it celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés ou autrement may be printed or otherwise reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Prostaglandin E2 Receptors in Asthma and in Chronic Rhinosinusitis/Nasal
    Machado-Carvalho et al. Respiratory Research 2014, 15:100 http://respiratory-research.com/content/15/1/100 REVIEW Open Access Prostaglandin E2 receptors in asthma and in chronic rhinosinusitis/nasal polyps with and without aspirin hypersensitivity Liliana Machado-Carvalho1,2,3*, Jordi Roca-Ferrer1,2,3 and César Picado1,2,3 Abstract Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and asthma frequently coexist and are always present in patients with aspirin exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD). Although the pathogenic mechanisms of this condition are still unknown, AERD may be due, at least in part, to an imbalance in eicosanoid metabolism (increased production of cysteinyl leukotrienes (CysLTs) and reduced biosynthesis of prostaglandin (PG) E2), possibly increasing and perpetuating the process of inflammation. PGE2 results from the metabolism of arachidonic acid (AA) by cyclooxygenase (COX) enzymes, and seems to play a central role in homeostasis maintenance and inflammatory response modulation in airways. Therefore, the abnormal regulation of PGE2 could contribute to the exacerbated processes observed in AERD. PGE2 exerts its actions through four G-protein-coupled receptors designated E-prostanoid (EP) receptors EP1, EP2, EP3, and EP4. Altered PGE2 production as well as differential EP receptor expression has been reported in both upper and lower airways of patients with AERD. Since the heterogeneity of these receptors is the key for the multiple biological effects of PGE2 this review focuses on the studies available to elucidate the importance of these receptors in inflammatory airway diseases. Keywords: Aspirin exacerbated respiratory disease, Asthma, Chronic rhinosinusitis, Nasal polyps, Prostaglandin E2, Prostaglandin E2 receptors Introduction manifests clinically with repeated, variable, and episodic The purpose of this review is to offer a global overview of attacks of cough, wheezing and breathlessness [3,4].
    [Show full text]
  • Modèle in Vitro Pour L'étude De L'expression D'insl3 En Présence
    Modèle in vitro pour l’étude de l’expression d’INSL3 en présence de perturbateurs endocriniens Thèse Eric Laguë Doctorat en médecine moléculaire Philosophiae doctor (Ph.D.) Québec, Canada © Eric Laguë, 2016 Résumé Plusieurs études ont démontré l’existence d’une corrélation directe entre l’exposition fœtale à des contaminants environnementaux (comme le DEHP ou les estrogènes) et la perturbation de la différenciation sexuelle chez les fœtus mâles. Ces études ont notamment mis en évidence l’existence d’une fenêtre de susceptibilité; une période pendant laquelle l’exposition des cellules de Leydig aux contaminants perturbe leurs activités et entraine une diminution de leurs sécrétions des hormones testostérone (T) et Insulin-like 3 (INSL3). Ces hormones sécrétées par les cellules de Leydig sont requises pour la différenciation sexuelle du fœtus mâle, l’adoption des caractéristiques masculines primaires et secondaires (revue de Robert Courrier, 1962). Ces hormones influencent aussi la formation des spermatozoïdes et le comportement sexuel. Les études démontrent qu’une production insuffisante de ces hormones est corrélée avec une fertilité réduite (de modérée à très grave), une sous-masculinisation, la non-descente des testicules dans le scrotum (cryptorchidie) et parfois même une féminisation des organes sexuels primaires. Selon plusieurs spécialistes, ces symptômes seraient le résultat d’une perturbation de l’ontogenèse des testicules durant le développement fœtal. Syndrome de dysgénésie testiculaire est le nom qui a été donné à cette théorie. La cryptorchidie congénitale découlerait donc d’une insuffisance d’activités hormonales et révélerait par le fait même un problème de dysgénésie testiculaire. Bien que la prévalence varie à travers le monde, il semblerait, qu’en moyenne, au moins 4 % des nouveau-nés naissent avec cette condition.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of G Protein-Coupled Receptors in Lymphoid Malignancies
    Accepted Manuscript The role of G protein-coupled receptors in lymphoid malignancies Adrienne Nugent, Richard L. Proia PII: S0898-6568(17)30218-8 DOI: doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2017.08.002 Reference: CLS 8973 To appear in: Cellular Signalling Received date: 25 May 2017 Revised date: 4 August 2017 Accepted date: 7 August 2017 Please cite this article as: Adrienne Nugent, Richard L. Proia , The role of G protein- coupled receptors in lymphoid malignancies, Cellular Signalling (2017), doi: 10.1016/ j.cellsig.2017.08.002 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Title: The role of G protein-coupled receptors in lymphoid malignancies Adrienne Nugent and Richard L. Proia National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA; [email protected] and [email protected] Address correspondence to: Richard L. Proia, PhD NIH/NIDDK 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA (301) 496-4391 [email protected] Disclosure of conflicts of interest: None Author contributions: AN conceptualized, wrote and edited the review; RLP conceptualized and edited the review. All authors have approved the final article.
    [Show full text]