This is a repository copy of A comparative analysis of the evolution of imperfect mimicry.. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/74902/ Article: Penney, HD, Hassall, C, Skevington, JH et al. (2 more authors) (2012) A comparative analysis of the evolution of imperfect mimicry. Nature, 483 (7390). 461 - 464 . ISSN 0028-0836 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10961 Reuse See Attached Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing
[email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request.
[email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ A comparative analysis of the evolution of imperfect mimicry, Penney et al. (2012) - SELF-ARCHIVED COPY This document is the final, reviewed, A , as submitted to the journal Nature. It does not include any modifications made during typesetting or copy-editing by the Nature publishing team. This document was archived six months after publication of the article in line with the self-archiving policies of the journal Nature, which can be found here: http://www.nature.com/authors/policies/license.html The version of record can be found at the following address: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v483/n7390/abs/nature10961.html The paper should be cited as: PENNEY, H. D., HASSALL, C., SKEVINGTON, J. H., ABBOTT, K. R. & SHERRATT, T. N. 2012. A comparative analysis of the evolution of imperfect mimicry. Nature, 483, 461-464. 1 Title: A comparative analysis of the evolution of imperfect mimicry Heather D.