DOCSLIB.ORG

Indian Point, Units 2 & 3, Environmental Impact Statement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Indian Point, Units 2 & 3, Environmental Impact Statement Environmental Impact Statement Scoping Process Summary Report Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station Unit Nos. 2 and 3 Village of Buchanan, New York December 2008 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Rockville, Maryland Introduction On April 30, 2007, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) received an application from Entergy Nuclear Operations dated April 23, 2007, for renewal of the operating licenses of Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station Unit Nos. 2 and 3 (IP2 and IP3), Village of Buchanan, New York. As part of the application, Entergy Nuclear Operations submitted an environmental report (ER) prepared in accordance with the requirements of Title 10, Part 51 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR Part 51). Part 51 of 10 CFR contains the NRC requirements for implementing the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 and the implementing regulations promulgated by the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ). Section 51.53 outlines requirements for preparation and submittal of environmental reports to the NRC. Section 51.53(c)(3) was based upon the findings documented in NUREG-1437, “Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Power Plants,” (GEIS). The GEIS, which identified and evaluated the environmental impacts associated with license renewal, was first issued as a draft for public comment. The staff received input from Federal and State agencies, public organizations, and private citizens before developing the final document. As a result of the assessments in the GEIS, a number of impacts were determined to be small and generic to all nuclear power plants. These were designated as Category 1 impacts. An applicant for license renewal may adopt the conclusions contained in the GEIS for Category 1 impacts, absent new and significant information that may cause the conclusions to fall outside those of the GEIS. Category 2 impacts are those impacts that have been determined to be plant-specific and are required to be evaluated in the applicant’s ER. The Commission has determined that the NRC does not have a role in energy planning decision-making for existing plants, which should be left to state regulators and utility officials. Therefore, an applicant for license renewal need not provide an analysis of the need for power, or the economic costs and economic benefits of the proposed action. Additionally, the Commission has determined that the ER need not discuss any aspect of storage of spent fuel for the facility that is within the scope of the generic determination in 10 CFR 51.23(a) and in accordance with 10 CFR 51.23(b). This determination was based on the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 and the Commission’s Waste Confidence Rule, 10 CFR 51.23. On August 10, 2007, the NRC published a Notice of Intent in the Federal Register (72 FR 45075), to notify the public of the Staff’s intent to prepare a plant-specific supplement to the GEIS (SEIS) regarding the renewal application for the IP2 and IP3 operating license. The SEIS will be prepared in accordance with NEPA, CEQ guidelines, and 10 CFR Part 51. As outlined by NEPA, the NRC initiated the scoping process with the issuance of the Federal Register Notice. The NRC invited the applicant, federal, state, local, and tribal government agencies, local organizations, and individuals to participate in the scoping process by providing oral comments at scheduled public meetings and/or submitting written suggestions and comments no later than October 12, 2007. The scoping process included two public scoping meetings, which were both held on September 19, 2007, at Colonial Terrace, 119 Oregon Road, Cortlandt Manor, New York. The NRC issued press releases and distributed flyers locally. Both sessions began with NRC staff members providing a brief overview of the license renewal process and the NEPA process. Following the NRC’s prepared statements, the meetings were open for public comments. Approximately 50 attendees provided oral comments that were recorded and transcribed by a certified court reporter. The meeting summary, which was issued on October - 1 - 24, 2007, and the associated transcripts are available for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR), located at One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland, 20852, or from the NRC’s Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). The ADAMS Public Electronic Reading Room is accessible at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html. The meeting summary can be found in ADAMS at Accession No. ML072851079. The transcripts of the meetings can be found in ADAMS at Accession Nos. ML072830682 and ML072890209. Persons who do not have access to ADAMS, or who encounter problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS, should contact the NRC’s PDR reference staff by telephone at 1-800-397-4209, or 301-415- 4737, or by e-mail at [email protected]. The scoping process provides an opportunity for public participation to identify issues to be addressed in the SEIS and highlight public concerns and issues. The Notice of Intent identified the following objectives of the scoping process: $ Define the proposed action $ Determine the scope of the SEIS and identify significant issues to be analyzed in depth $ Identify and eliminate peripheral issues $ Identify any environmental assessments and other environmental impact statements being prepared that are related to SEIS $ Identify other environmental review and consultation requirements $ Indicate the schedule for preparation of the SEIS $ Identify any cooperating agencies $ Describe how the SEIS will be prepared. At the conclusion of the scoping period, the NRC staff and its contractor reviewed the transcripts and all written material received, and identified individual comments. Each set of comments from a given commenter was given a unique alpha identifier (Commenter ID), allowing each set of comments from a commenter to be traced back to the transcript, letter, or email in which the comments were submitted (publicly available on ADAMS). Comments were consolidated and categorized according to the topic within the proposed SEIS or according to the general topic if outside the scope of the SEIS. Comments with similar specific objectives were combined to capture the common essential issues that had been raised in the source comments. Once comments were grouped according to subject area, the staff and contractor determined the appropriate action for each comment. Table 1 identifies the individuals providing comments and the Commenter ID letter associated with each person's set(s) of comments. The Commenter ID letter is preceded by IPEC. - 2 - Table A-1. Individuals Providing Comments During Scoping Comment Period Commenters Commenter Affiliation (If Stated) Comment Source ADAMS ID Accession Nos. IPEC-A Riverkeeper Riverkeeper Staff Attorneys Written Comments ML071730115 IPEC-B FUSE Friends United for Written Comments ML071990093 Sustainable Energy (FUSE) IPEC-C Susan Shapiro, Esq. Friends United for Written Comments ML071930400 Sustainable Energy (FUSE) IPEC-D John J. Sipos New York State Assistant Written Comments ML072050210 Attorney General IPEC-E Chris Hogan Project Manager for Afternoon Scoping ML072830682 NYSDEC Meeting IPEC-F Taylor Palmer Representative for Afternoon Scoping ML072830682 Congresswoman Nita Lowey Meeting IPEC-G Jim Knuebel NY AREA Afternoon Scoping ML072830682 Meeting IPEC-H Sherwood Martinelli FUSE, Green Nuclear Afternoon Scoping ML072830682 Butterfly Meeting IPEC-I Elizabeth Segal Resident, Tarrytown Afternoon Scoping ML072830682 Meeting IPEC-J Gary Shaw Local Resident Afternoon Scoping ML072830682 Meeting IPEC-K Phillip Musegaas Riverkeeper Afternoon Scoping ML072830682 Meeting IPEC-L Lloyd Douglas Association of Minority and Afternoon Scoping ML072830682 Women Entrepreneurs Meeting IPEC-M Glenn Rickles Riverkeeper Afternoon Scoping ML072830682 Meeting IPEC-N Mike Otis Professor of Engineering at Afternoon Scoping ML072830682 SUNY New Paltz Meeting IPEC-O Charlie Donaldson Environmental Protection Afternoon Scoping ML072830682 Bureau Meeting IPEC-P John Kelly Local Resident, Retired from Afternoon Scoping ML072830682 Indian Point Meeting IPEC-Q Marilyn Elie Westchester Citizens Afternoon Scoping ML072830682 Awareness Network, Indian Meeting Point Safe Energy Coalition (IPSEC) IPEC-R Marie Quinten Pace Litigation Clinic Afternoon Scoping ML072830682 Meeting IPEC-S Susan Shapiro President, FUSE Afternoon Scoping ML072830682 Meeting - 3 - Table A-1. (cont’d) Commenters Commenter Affiliation (If Stated) Comment Source ML Number ID IPEC-T Hazel Dukes New York State NAACP Afternoon Scoping ML072830682 Meeting IPEC-U Michel Lee Council on Intelligent Energy Afternoon Scoping ML072830682 & Conservation Policy Meeting IPEC-V Ron Carpino Indian Point Senior Reactor Afternoon Scoping ML072830682 Operator Meeting IPEC-W Dan Durett African American Afternoon Scoping ML072830682 Environmental Association Meeting IPEC-X Ulrich Witte Citizen Afternoon Scoping ML072830682 Meeting IPEC-Y Tom Hallsel Citizen Afternoon Scoping ML072830682 Meeting IPEC-Z Susan Peale Resident, Phillipstown Afternoon Scoping ML072830682 Meeting IPEC-AA Bill Maulmeister Entergy Afternoon Scoping ML072830682 Meeting IPEC-BB Radmila Miletich Independent Power Afternoon Scoping ML072830682 Producers of New York Meeting IPEC-CC Laura Seitz Resident, Croton-on-Hudson Afternoon Scoping ML072830682 Meeting IPEC-DD Chris Hogan Project Manager for Evening Scoping ML072830646 NYSDEC Meeting IPEC-EE Frank Giancimilli Office of Congressman
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SAN LUIS OBISPO MOTHERS for PEACE; SANTA LUCIA CHAPTER of the SIERRA CLUB; PEG PINARD, Petitioners, No
    FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SAN LUIS OBISPO MOTHERS FOR PEACE; SANTA LUCIA CHAPTER OF THE SIERRA CLUB; PEG PINARD, Petitioners, No. 03-74628 NRC No. PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, CLI-03-01; Intervenor, CLI-02-23 v. OPINION NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondents. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Argued and Submitted October 17, 2005—San Francisco, California Filed June 2, 2006 Before: Stephen Reinhardt and Sidney R. Thomas, Circuit Judges, and Jane A. Restani,* Chief Judge, United States Court of International Trade Opinion by Judge Thomas *The Honorable Jane A. Restani, Chief Judge, United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation. 6063 SAN LUIS OBISPO MOTHERS v. NRC 6067 COUNSEL Diane Curran, Harmon, Curran, Spielberg & Eisenberg, L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for the petitioners. Charles E. Mullins, United States Nuclear Regulatory Com- mission, Washington, D.C., for the respondents. David A. Repka, Winston & Strawn, L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for respondent-intervenor PG&E. Sheldon L. Trubatch, Esq., Offices of Robert K. Temple, Esq., Chicago, Illinois, for amicus San Luis Obispo County. Kevin James, California Department of Justice, Oakland, Cal- ifornia, for amicus States of California, Massachusetts, Utah and Washington. Jay E. Silberg, Shaw Pittman, L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for amicus Nuclear Energy Institute. OPINION THOMAS, Circuit Judge: This case presents the question, inter alia, as to whether the likely environmental consequences of a potential terrorist 6068 SAN LUIS OBISPO MOTHERS v. NRC attack on a nuclear facility must be considered in an environ- mental review required under the National Environmental Policy Act.
    [Show full text]
  • No Nukes Study You Don't Need to Be a Nuclear Physicist to Understand
    No Nukes Study You don’t need to be a nuclear physicist to understand that nuclear weapons and nuclear power are both bad for our species and bad for the planet. It’s not exactly rocket science to understand our need to move away from both nuclear energy and fossil fuels and toward a safe, sustainable, and democratic energy system based on solar, wind, and other renewable resources. However, given the powerful economic interests, often called the “Merchants of Death,” which profit from United States nuclear weapons and the rest of the U.S. war machine and which exert an undue and undemocratic influence on U.S. policy through making us accept the nuclear/fossil fuel complex, it is wise to arm oneself with a better understanding of nuclear and sustainable energy issues. The literature is vast, both published and on the web. Here is a listing of some of the most important internet resources, most of which have additional links. Atomic Archive. This site explores the complex history surrounding the invention of the atomic bomb. Includes a good section on the history of the Cold War. http://www.atomicarchive.com/index.shtml Fiat Pax is a project to provide information to university students, faculty, and the public regarding the militarization of science and the university, focusing on the University of California and its ties to the military enterprise, but also examples of the larger military- industrial-academic complex. http://www.fiatpax.net/index.html Greenpece International. http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/campaigns/nuclear/ Mothers for Peace, in San Luis Obispo, is a non-profit organization concerned with the local dangers involving the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, and with the dangers of nuclear power, weapons and waste on national and global levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Citizen Copyright © 2016 by Public Citizen Foundation All Rights Reserved
    Public Citizen Copyright © 2016 by Public Citizen Foundation All rights reserved. Public Citizen Foundation 1600 20th St. NW Washington, D.C. 20009 www.citizen.org ISBN: 978-1-58231-099-2 Doyle Printing, 2016 Printed in the United States of America PUBLIC CITIZEN THE SENTINEL OF DEMOCRACY CONTENTS Preface: The Biggest Get ...................................................................7 Introduction ....................................................................................11 1 Nader’s Raiders for the Lost Democracy....................................... 15 2 Tools for Attack on All Fronts.......................................................29 3 Creating a Healthy Democracy .....................................................43 4 Seeking Justice, Setting Precedents ..............................................61 5 The Race for Auto Safety ..............................................................89 6 Money and Politics: Making Government Accountable ..............113 7 Citizen Safeguards Under Siege: Regulatory Backlash ................155 8 The Phony “Lawsuit Crisis” .........................................................173 9 Saving Your Energy .................................................................... 197 10 Going Global ...............................................................................231 11 The Fifth Branch of Government................................................ 261 Appendix ......................................................................................271 Acknowledgments ........................................................................289
    [Show full text]
  • Tontodonato RE D 2021.Pdf (2.700Mb)
    Co-production of Science and Regulation Radiation Health and the Linear No-Threshold Model Richard E. Tontodonato Dissertation submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In Science and Technology Studies Sonja D. Schmid Barbara L. Allen Rebecca J. Hester David C. Tomblin May 10, 2021 Falls Church, Virginia Keywords: Actor-Network Theory, Co-production, Dose-Effect Model, Imaginaries, Nuclear, Radiation, Regulation, Standards Co-production of Science and Regulation Radiation Health and the Linear No-Threshold Model Richard E. Tontodonato ABSTRACT The model used as the basis for regulation of human radiation exposures in the United States has been a source of controversy for decades because human health consequences have not been determined with statistically meaningful certainty for the dose levels allowed for radiation workers and the general public. This dissertation evaluates the evolution of the science and regulation of radiation health effects in the United States since the early 1900s using actor-network theory and the concept of co- production of science and social order. This approach elucidated the ordering instruments that operated at the nexus of the social and the natural in making institutions, identities, discourses, and representations, and the sociotechnical imaginaries animating the use of those instruments, that culminated in a regulatory system centered on the linear no-threshold dose-response model and the As Low As Reasonably Achievable philosophy. The science of radiation health effects evolved in parallel with the development of radiation-related technologies and the associated regulatory system.
    [Show full text]
  • EXTENSIONS of REMARKS July 12, 1971 241
    24670 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS July 12, 1971 241. By the SPEAKER: Memorial of the the United States extending the right to vote \ By Mr. I CHORD: l House of Representatives of the Common­ to citizens 18 yea.rs of age and older; to the H.R. 9726. A bill for the relief of Eddie wealth of Massachusetts, relative to Con­ Committee on the Judiciary. Byrd; to the Committee on the Judiciary. gress appropriating the full funding au­ 244. Also, memorial of the Legislature of thorized by the Lead-Based Paint Poisoning the State of California, relative to Federal Preven tion Act of 1971; to the Committee on disaster relief funds; to the Committee on PETITIONS, ETC. Appropriations. Public Works. 242. Also, memorial of the House of Rep­ Under clause 1 of rule XXII, petitions resentatives of the Commonwealth of Mas­ and papers were laid on the Clerk's desk sachusetts, urging the Government of North and referred as follows: Vietnam to withdraw all Oommunlst troops PRIVATE BILLS AND RESOLUTIONS 101. By the SPEAKER: Petition of Henry from South Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia Under clause 1 of rule XXII, private Stoner, York, Pa., relative to statehood for and to release forthwith American prisoners bills and resolutions were introduced and Puerto Rico; to the Committee on Interior of wa.r; to the Committee on Foreign Affairs. severally referred as follows: & Insular Affairs. 243. Also, memorial of the Legislature of 102. Also, petition of Romualdo Ma.turan, By Mr. CHAMBERLAIN: Mindanao, Ph111pp1nes, relative to redress of the State of Alabama, relative to ratifying the H.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc.'S Petition to Intervene and Request For
    7"04A1q57/8, ; GLEARWATER,INHuDsoN RIVER SLOOP .INC. DOCKETED USNRC December 10, 2007. December 11, 2007 (7:55am) OFFICE OF SECRETARY Office of the Secretary RULEMAKINGS AND U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission . ADJUDICATIONS STAFF Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Attention: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff Subject: IndianPoint License Renewal Proceeding, Docket No. 50-247-LR and 246-LR Dear Sir or Madam: Enclosed for filing by mail, please find the original. and two copies of the following documents: 1. Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc.'s Petition to Intervene and Request for.. Hearing, with Certificate of Service. *,2. Notice of Appearance for Stephen C. Filler. (Notice of Appearanc~e for Manna Jo Greene was previously filed and served with Clearwater's request for -an extension). For electronic filing and service, please note that we have been unable to create reasonably-sized files of all of our Exhibits and Declarations. Rather than burden everyone's servers with huge files or multiple deliveries, we are only filing and serving the following documents electronically: Petition to Intervene and Request for Hearing; .Notice of Appearance for Stephen C. Filler; Declaration of Jeffrey N.S Rumpf; Declaration of Manna Jo Green;- Declaration-of Stephen C. Filler with exhibits; Exhibit 4 to our Petition containing Declaration" of Joseph Mangano and Report; and Certificate of Service. If anyone would like electronic delivery of additional documents before receipt'of hard copies, we will make our best. efforts to do so. We apologize for any inconvenience. Thank you foryour consideration.'. Respectftully, Manna Jo Greene, Environmental Director • Hudson River Sloop Clearwater - cc: Lawrence G.
    [Show full text]
  • Mark Evanoff Papers, 1947-1988
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8q81k7b No online items Finding Aid to the Mark Evanoff Papers Lisa M. Monhoff The Bancroft Library 2017 The Bancroft Library University of California Berkeley, CA 94720-6000 [email protected] URL: http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/libraries/bancroft-library Finding Aid to the Mark Evanoff BANC MSS 99/295 1 Papers Language of Material: English Contributing Institution: The Bancroft Library Title: Mark Evanoff papers, 1947-1988 Creator: Evanoff, Mark Identifier/Call Number: BANC MSS 99/295 Physical Description: 18.65 linear feet (13 cartons, 2 boxes, 1 oversize box, 1 oversize folder) Date (inclusive): 1947-1988 Date (bulk): 1977-1988 Abstract: This collection documents Mark Evanoff's interest and involvement in opposing the proliferation of nuclear reactors, primarily in California during the 1970s and 1980s. Materials include correspondence, notes, photographs, legislation, testimony, newsletters, group organizing resources, pamphlets, and other printed ephemera by numerous anti-nuclear activist individuals and organizations, energy companies, and local and federal agencies. Location: Many of the Bancroft Library collections are stored offsite and advance notice may be required for use. For current information on the location of these materials, please consult the library's online catalog. Conditions Governing Access Collection is open for research. Accruals No future additions are expected. Immediate Source of Acquisition Mark Evanoff's papers were gifted to The Bancroft Library by Mark Evanoff in 1999. Arrangement This collection is arranged into three series. Series I includes materials related to the Diablo Canyon Power Plant, with a sub-series on general Diablo Canyon files and a sub-series on the Abalone Alliance, the anti-nuclear activist group which formed in opposition to the Diablo Canyon power plant.
    [Show full text]
  • Extensions of Remarks
    19242 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS July 16, 1985 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS PRESERVING OUR HERITAGE: tax credit for 25 percent of the cost of reha­ 250,000 buildings are listed on the National THE HISTORIC REHABILITA­ bilitating certified historic buildings. Register of Historic Places. Only a few of TION TAX CREDIT When Chairman Dan Rostenkowski and those can, or should, be museums. The Chairman Robert Packwood and the other others will survive only if they can be made members of the House Ways and Means and to serve as some one's home, office, business HON. WIWAM J. COYNE Senate Finance Committees review the his­ or factory. OF PENNSYLVANIA toric rehabilitation tax credit on its own We need others to do that kind of work IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES merits, as they will, they will discover that because we don't do it. We need the develop­ here is one of the few remaining, and cer­ ers and the business community to invest Tuesday, July 16, 1985 tainly one of the most effective, mecha­ their dollars and energy. That's why the Na­ •Mr. COYNE. Mr. Speaker, who has nisms for community revitalization and eco­ tional Trust and other members of the pres­ not walked down a familiar street and, nomic development. And they will discover ervation community including Preservation that here is a proper use of the tax code to Action and the American Institute of Archi­ after surveying an uninspired set of correct the marketplace's obvious under­ tects sought preservation tax incentives. modern buildings, paused to think not valuation of retaining significant parts of And now that we have the developers with about what is but what was? If we are America's heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • NUREG-0750, Vol. 68, Book II, "Nuclear Regulatory Commission
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ISSUANCES OPINIONS AND DECISIONS OF THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WITH SELECTED ORDERS October 1, 2008 - December 31, 2008 Volume 68 Book II of II Pages 461 - 958 Prepared by the Office of Administration U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 (301-492-3678) COMMISSIONERS Dale E. Klein, Chairman Gregory B. Jaczko Peter B. Lyons Kristine L. Svinicki William Borchardt, Executive Director for Operations Karen D. Cyr, General Counsel E. Roy Hawkens, Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety & Licensing Board Panel ii ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD PANEL E. Roy Hawkens,* Chief Administrative Judge Thomas S. Moore,* Associate Chief Administrative Judge (Legal) Dr. Anthony J. Baratta,* Associate Chief Administrative Judge (Technical) Dr. Paul B. Abramson,* Special Associate Chief Administrative Judge (Technical/Legal) Members Dr. Gary S. Arnold* Dr. David L. Hetrick Dr. Frederick W. Oliver Dr. Mark O. Barnett Dr. Thomas J. Hirons Dr. William H. Reed G. Paul Bollwerk, III* Dr. James F. Jackson Alan S. Rosenthal Dr. Robin Brett Dr. Jeffrey D.E. Jeffries Lester S. Rubenstein Dr. William C. Burnett Alex S. Karlin* Paul S. Ryerson* Dr. Randall J. Charbeneau Dr. William E. Kastenberg Dr. William W. Sager Dr. Richard F. Cole* Dr. Charles N. Kelber Dr. David R. Schink Dr. Thomas S. Elleman Dr. Michael F. Kennedy* Ronald M. Spritzer* Michael C. Farrar* Dr. Kaye D. Lathrop Dr. Michael G. Stevenson William J. Froehlich* Dr. R. Bruce Matthews Nicholas G. Trikouros* Dr. Michael O. Garcia Lawrence G. McDade* Dr. Nicholas Tsoulfanidis Michael M. Gibson* Dr. Alice C. Mignerey Dr. Richard E. Wardwell* Brian K.
    [Show full text]
  • Endorsers of the Open Letter to Presidents Biden and Putin
    Endorsers of the Open Letter to Presidents Biden and Putin Political, military and religious leaders, legislators, academics/scientists and other representatives of civil society* POLITICAL LEADERS & INFLUENCERS: Nobuyasu Abe, Japan Dr Irina Ghaplanyan, Armenia. Senior Adviser, Council on Strategic Risks. Former United Senior Advisor on Climate Change to the World Bank Group. Nations Under-Secretary-General for Disarmament Affairs; Former Deputy Minister of Environment; Ambassador Edy Korthals Altes, The Netherlands. Dame Jane Goodall, PhD, DBE, United Kingdom Former Ambassador of The Netherlands to Spain and Primatologist, Founder of the Jane Goodall Institute. President of the World Conference of Religions for Peace; UN Messenger for Peace. Honorary Member of the World Future Council; Lord (Des) Browne of Ladyton, United Kingdom. Member of UK House of Lords. Former Defence Secretary. Ambassador (ret) Thomas Graham Jr. USA Chair, European Leadership Network; Former Special Representative of the President for Arms Control, Non-Proliferation and Disarmament Ambassador Libran Nuevas Cabactulan, Philippines Former Permanent Representative of the Philippines to the Dr Anatoliy Grytsenko, Ukraine. United Nations in New York. President of the 2010 NPT Former Defense Minister (2005-2007); Head, National Review Conference. Security & Defense Committee of Parliament; Vincenzo Camporini, Italy. Lord David Hannay of Chiswick, United Kingdom. Scientific Advisor at Istituto Affari Internazionali. Crossbench Peer, UK House of Lords. Co-Chair of the UK All Former Minister of Defence. Party Parliamentary Group on Global Security and Non- proliferation. Senior Member, European Leadership Network. Ingvar Carlsson, Sweden. Former Prime Minister of Sweden. Silvia Hernández, México Senior Member, European Leadership Network; Founding Partner of Estrategia Pública Consultores.
    [Show full text]
  • 67 Pages 1 - 508
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ISSUANCES OPINIONS AND DECISIONS OF THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WITH SELECTED ORDERS January 1, 2008 S June 30, 2008 Volume 67 Pages 1 - 508 Prepared by the Office of Administration U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 (301-492-3678) COMMISSIONERS Dale E. Klein, Chairman Gregory B. Jaczko Peter B. Lyons Kristine L. Svinicki* Luis A. Reyes, Executive Director for Operations (January 1, 2008 to May 1, 2008) William Borchardt, Executive Director for Operations (May 2, 2008 to June 30, 2008) Karen D. Cyr, General Counsel E. Roy Hawkens, Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety & Licensing Board Panel * Ms. Svinicki began serving as Commissioner on March 28, 2008. ii ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD PANEL E. Roy Hawkens,* Chief Administrative Judge Thomas S. Moore,* Associate Chief Administrative Judge (Legal) Dr. Anthony J. Baratta,* Associate Chief Administrative Judge (Technical) Dr. Paul B. Abramson,* Special Associate Chief Administrative Judge (Technical/Legal) Members Dr. Gary S. Arnold Dr. Thomas J. Hirons Dr. William H. Reed G. Paul Bollwerk, III* Dr. James F. Jackson Alan S. Rosenthal Dr. Mark O. Barnett Alex S. Karlin* Lester S. Rubenstein Dr. Robin Brett Dr. William E. Kastenberg Paul S. Ryerson* Dr. William C. Burnett Dr. Charles N. Kelber Dr. William W. Sager Dr. Richard F. Cole* Dr. Michael F. Kennedy* Dr. David R. Schink Dr. Thomas S. Elleman Dr. Kaye D. Lathrop Ronald M. Spritzer* Michael C. Farrar* Dr. R. Bruce Matthews Dr. Michael G. Stevenson William J. Froehlich* Lawrence G. McDade* Nicholas G. Trikouros* Dr. Michael O. Garcia Dr. Alice C. Mignerey Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Mss 006 Ferry
    RUTH LILLY SPECIAL COLLECTIONS AND ARCHIVES Carol Bernstein Ferry and W. H. Ferry Papers, 1971-1997 Mss 006 Carol Bernstein Ferry and W.H. Ferry Papers, 1971-1997 Mss 006 22.4 c.f. (22 cartons and 1 document box) ABSTRACT Carol Bernstein Ferry and the late W. H. (Ping) Ferry were social change philanthropists who gave away a substantial part of their personal wealth to progressive social change groups, activities, and activists concentrating generally in the areas of war, racism, poverty, and injustice. The Ferrys were also board members of the DJB Foundation, established by Carol’s first husband, Daniel J. Bernstein, which focused its giving in similar areas. The papers, 1971-1996, document the individuals, organizations, and activities the Ferrys supported with their donations. ACCESS This collection is open to the public without restriction. The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. PREFERRED CITATION Cite as: Carol Bernstein Ferry and W. H. Ferry Papers, 1971-1997, Ruth Lilly Special Collections and Archives, University Library, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis ACQUISITION Presented by Carol Bernstein Ferry and W. H. Ferry, December 1993. A93-89, A96-33 Processed by Brenda L. Burk and Danielle Macsay, February, 1998. Ferry Finding Aid - page 2 HISTORY Carol Bernstein Ferry was born Carol Underwood in 1924 in upstate New York and grew up in Portland, Maine. She attended a private girls’ school and graduated from Wells College, a small woman’s college near Auburn, New York, in 1945. She moved to New York City in 1946 and worked as a copy editor and proofreader, eventually freelancing in that capacity for McGraw- Hill.
    [Show full text]