United Nations Improvised Explosive Device Disposal Standards

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

United Nations Improvised Explosive Device Disposal Standards Document Reference No. 2018.05 United Nations Improvised Explosive Device Disposal Standards May 2018 ___________________________________________________________________ United Nations Mine Action Service (UNMAS) Email: [email protected] Website: www.unmas.org Scope The United Nations Improvised Explosive Device Disposal (IEDD) Standards have been developed to fill a gap in the technical guidance required to respond to the expanding and increasingly complex problem of IEDs. IEDs impede humanitarian access as well as other UN operations and impact on civilians, United Nations personnel and clearance organizations. In all areas of its IED response, the United Nations requires a safe, cost-effective and coherent approach to IED disposal. The United Nations has a duty of care to ensure that those entrusted with the task of IED disposal have a competent and practical standard to reference to protect their own lives and ensure operational and cost effectiveness. The United Nations IEDD Standards are of a technical nature; they are for use by IED disposal operators and for the organizations and units that employ them under the auspices of the United Nations. For Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) Units deployed in United Nations Peacekeeping Operations, the IEDD Standards outline the competencies required by individuals to meet the collective unit requirements set forth in the United Nations EOD Unit Manual. For commercial and non-governmental organizations contracted by the United Nations, these Standards provide the basis for evaluation of the contractors Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for IED disposal operations where the context or mandate objective is not humanitarian. In today’s asymmetric environment, and the multi-dimensional nature of Mission activities, the United Nations must be prepared to respond safely and in a timely, cost- effective manner to IED threats before well-defined humanitarian space emerges. The International Mine Action Standards (IMAS) provide the framework for humanitarian response of all explosive devices cleared under humanitarian conditions in strict compliance with humanitarian principles. The elaboration of these IEDD Standards has been coordinated by the United Nations Mine Action Service, supported by the Office of Military Affairs of the United Nations Department of Peacekeeping Operations, and with the technical advice of national experts having specific expertise in IED threat mitigation. This process also involved extensive outreach and consultations with experts from the mine action sector to incorporate best and most current practices, wherever applicable. The IEDD Standards have been developed without prejudice to the scope and definitions provided in the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention and the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons. These IEDD Standards are intended for use by the United Nations. Member States may also choose to refer to them in the development of national policies and practices. 3 CONTENTS PREFACE ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 SCOPE .......................................................................................................................................................... 3 CHAPTER 1 ................................................................................................................................................ 10 INTRODUCTION TO IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE DISPOSAL ................................................... 10 1.1 CONTEXT OF THE IED THREAT ............................................................................................................................... 10 1.2 ROLES AND ACTORS ............................................................................................................................................ 13 1.2.1 IED CLEARANCE ............................................................................................................................................ 14 1.2.1.1 OPEN AREA IED CLEARANCE ....................................................................................................................... 14 1.2.1.2 INFRASTRUCTURE AND URBAN SPACE IED CLEARANCE .......................................................................................... 15 1.2.1.3 PROTECTION - MOBILITY PROTECTION AND IED INCIDENT RESPONSE ...................................................................... 15 1.2.1.4 IED AWARENESS AND RISK EDUCATION ............................................................................................................. 16 1.2.1.5 CAPACITY BUILDING ....................................................................................................................................... 16 1.2.1.6 INFORMATION MANAGEMENT ......................................................................................................................... 16 1.3 IEDD FUNDAMENTALS ........................................................................................................................................ 17 1.3.1 IEDD PHILOSOPHY ........................................................................................................................................ 17 1.3.2 IEDD PRINCIPLES .......................................................................................................................................... 18 1.4 PLANNING IEDD CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS .............................................................................................................. 19 CHAPTER 2 ................................................................................................................................................ 23 IEDD PLANNING ........................................................................................................................................ 23 2.1 PLANNING AND THREAT ASSESSMENT ........................................................................................................................ 23 2.1.1 NATIONAL LEVEL ................................................................................................................................................. 24 2.1.2 AREA LEVEL ....................................................................................................................................................... 25 2.1.3 SCENE LEVEL ...................................................................................................................................................... 26 2.1.4 Flow of Tasks …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 27 CHAPTER 3 ................................................................................................................................................ 30 IEDD CAPABILITIES .................................................................................................................................. 30 3.1 BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................................................... 30 3.2 IEDD STRUCTURES ................................................................................................................................................. 31 3.2.1 IEDD TEAM STRUCTURES ............................................................................................................................... 31 3.2.2 IEDD TEAM FUNCTIONAL ROLES ...................................................................................................................... 33 3.2.2.1 BASIC IEDD OPERATOR ............................................................................................................................. 33 3.2.2.2 IEDD ASSISTANT ...................................................................................................................................... 34 3.2.2.3 INTERMEDIATE IEDD OPERATOR ................................................................................................................. 34 3.2.2.4 ADVANCED IEDD OPERATOR ...................................................................................................................... 35 3.2.3 IEDD TEAM CATEGORIES AND ROLES ................................................................................................................ 36 4 3.2.3.1 BASIC IEDD TEAM .................................................................................................................................... 36 3.2.3.2 INTERMEDIATE IEDD TEAM ........................................................................................................................ 37 3.2.3.3 ADVANCED IEDD TEAM ............................................................................................................................. 37 3.2.4 EXTERNAL SUPPORT TO IEDD ..................................................................................................................... 38 CHAPTER 4 ................................................................................................................................................ 40 IEDD TRAINING ......................................................................................................................................... 40 4.1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................... 40 4.2 MANAGEMENT OF TRAINING ...................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Med-Eng® Protective Equipment, Specialized Tools and Crew Survivability Solutions Are Trusted in Over 100 Countries Worldwide
    SURVIVABILITY SYSTEMS // // PRODUCTS CATALOG SURVIVABILITY SYSTEMS ARMOR COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS GEAR DUTY BIKE ACCESSORIES FIREARMS SURVIVABILITY SYSTEMS Med-Eng® protective equipment, specialized tools and crew survivability solutions are trusted in over 100 countries worldwide. For over 30 years, LETHAL Med-Eng has been pioneering research into blast effects on the human LESS body, and has shared that knowledge with frontline personnel and program managers to improve operator safety. This experience, and a relentless commitment to research, development and performance testing is the strength behind new and integrated solutions that are best in class. PROTECTIVE GEAR FORENSICS PERFORMANCE PERFORMANCE 258 // PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT APPAREL 259 // EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL TOOLS 260 // ROBOTS AND SEARCH 261 // MICRO CLIMATE SYSTEMS 261 // BLAST ATTENUATION SEATS SYSTEMS ARMOR SURVIVABILITY SYSTEMS TRAINING GROUP MED-ENG.COM 257 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL TOOLS Med-Eng® provides integrated systems designed to protect against blast, fragmentation, impact and heat. Our Personal Protective Equipment has been developed with direct input from end users and is based on knowledge and validation gained from over 600 live blast tests. For EOD/IEDD, Tactical and Demining operations, our Med-Eng Suits, Helmets, Visors and Hand Protectors have set the industry standard for 30 years. Med-Eng also offers purpose-built Dryers to help maintain your equipment. TAC 6 // PROTECTIVE SUIT A highly versatile, modular, lightweight protective suit
    [Show full text]
  • 4030 ELITE Bomb Disposal Suit & Helmet System
    4030 ELITE Bomb Disposal Suit & Helmet System Mission Critical Protection for EOD Operators npaerospace.com 4030 ELITE Core Benefits Mission Critical EOD Protection ADVANCED OPTICAL PERFORMANCE Advanced ergonomic helmet design offers high protection The 4030 ELITE is the next generation Bomb Disposal Suit and Helmet and a wide field of view, with an active demisting visor System from NP Aerospace, a global leader in ballistic protection and Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) design and manufacturing. The high performance, user configurable suit offers 360° protection from the four main EMERGENCY REMOVAL & EXTRACTION aspects of an explosion: fragmentation, overpressure, blast wind and heat radiation. Patented two pull quick release system in jacket and trousers Developed in response to customer feedback and using the latest technology, it is certified enables removal in less than 30 seconds and a new drag to the NIJ 0117.01 Public Safety Bomb Suit Standard by the Safety Equipment Institute. rescue feature allows for rapid emergency extraction The 4030 ELITE delivers improved survivability and ergonomics and accelerated donning and doffing. Protection is enhanced across critical areas such as the neck and torso providing an optimum performance to weight ratio. OPTIMUM SURVIVABILITY AT A LOW WEIGHT High protection across critical areas such as The highly adaptable suit allows for optional customisation with mix and match jacket the torso and neck ensures blast forces are and trouser sizing options and interoperability with the latest user communications deflected and fragments are absorbed and electronics, eliminating the need for a full scale technology upgrade. The 4030 ELITE is the latest addition to the NP Aerospace Bomb Disposal Suit portfolio which is proven and trusted by thousands of EOD operators worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release
    PRESS RELEASE Issue Date: January 2017 Morgan Advanced Materials demonstrates extensive blast survivability for Silverback 4020 Elite bomb disposal suit A new video released by Morgan Advanced Materials showcases the outstanding performance of its Silverback 4020 Elite bomb disposal suit against four life impacting aspects of blast; flame immersion, high velocity fragment impact, blast pressure wave and ‘tertiary’ effects; across four different blast tests. Critical to survivability, the tests illustrate the importance Morgan places on reducing the impact of blast pressure waves, which alongside flame and fragments, have devastating impact on internal organs without adequate protection. The testing was conducted at the independently certified OTS testing facility at Faldingworth (UK) and utilised a range of testing best practice, including key aspects of the NIJ 0117.00 Public Safety Bomb Suit Standard, in addition to other blast analysis including the Bowen Survivability Curve and overpressure reduction. The first blast test shown on the video demonstrates the suit’s survivability when kneeling, measured against the NIJ 0117.00 Public Safety Bomb Suit Standard for an explosive of 0.567kg C4 threat at 0.6m. The recorded footage reveals that the suit provides a pressure reduction between 96.9% and 99.7%, achieving a position on the Bowen Curve showing more than 99% survivability probability (in a controlled test environment). Three further blast tests assess the suit’s survivability when standing, facing a 1kg (2.20 lbs) C4 threat at 1m, a 2kg (4.41 lbs) C4 threat at 2m, and a 10kg (22.05 lbs) C4 threat at 3m. All three tests returned a www.morganadvancedmaterials.com PRESS RELEASE position on the Bowen Curve stating a survivability probability greater than 99% (in a controlled test environment), with a pressure reduction between 98.1% and 98.5% for 1kg and 10kg blasts.
    [Show full text]
  • Protective Armor Engineering Design
    PROTECTIVE ARMOR ENGINEERING DESIGN PROTECTIVE ARMOR ENGINEERING DESIGN Magdi El Messiry Apple Academic Press Inc. Apple Academic Press Inc. 3333 Mistwell Crescent 1265 Goldenrod Circle NE Oakville, ON L6L 0A2 Palm Bay, Florida 32905 Canada USA USA © 2020 by Apple Academic Press, Inc. Exclusive worldwide distribution by CRC Press, a member of Taylor & Francis Group No claim to original U.S. Government works International Standard Book Number-13: 978-1-77188-787-8 (Hardcover) International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-42905-723-6 (eBook) All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electric, mechanical or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and re- cording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publish- er or its distributor, except in the case of brief excerpts or quotations for use in reviews or critical articles. This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reprinted material is quoted with permission and sources are indicated. Copyright for individual articles remains with the authors as indicated. A wide variety of references are listed. Reasonable efforts have been made to publish reliable data and information, but the authors, editors, and the publisher cannot assume responsibility for the validity of all materials or the consequences of their use. The authors, editors, and the publisher have attempted to trace the copyright holders of all material reproduced in this publication and apologize to copyright holders if permission to publish in this form has not been obtained.
    [Show full text]
  • Zehr 10781508.Pdf (2.926Mb)
    SYMPATHETIC DETONATIQ IN LONG BORE HOLES Norman R. Zehr ProQuest Number: 10781508 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10781508 Published by ProQuest LLC(2018). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 A thesis submitted to the Faculty and Board of Trustees of the Colorado School of Mines in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science. Signed * Norman R. Zehr Golden, Colorado Date £Tovn«_ 6_____ 1955 App^oyjM L . J-l Parkinson Head, Mining Department Golden, Colorado Date . 1955 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author wishes to express his sincere ap­ preciation to those students of the Colorado School of Mines who assisted in the experimental work, and in particular to thank the following persons: Professor G. T. Bator of the Mining Department of the Colorado School of Mines. Professor E. G. Fisher of the English Department of the Colorado School of Mines, My wife, Irma, who assisted in the preparation of the manuscript. CONTENTS Abstract .... ............ Introduction ................. Location of Experiments . Equipment and Materials , Equipment . ... Materials ........ Basic Concepts ..............
    [Show full text]
  • DO NOT CIRCUWTE ~ I (L)
    LA-6711-MS Informal Report Special Distribution =. Issued: February 1977 4- / .. -<. —.-. : Ca ● “> Hazard Classification Test of Mixed-Load 30-mm GAU-8 Ammunition I by Bonfire Cookoff and Sympathetic Detonation Testing by J. C. Elder M. 1. Tillery H. J. Ettinger r 1 DO NOT CIRCUWTE ~ —r I I PERMANENT RETENTION REQUIREDBY CONTRACT : L — ..- 10s(l) adar scientific la b-r ‘ w 1“ of the University of Califc,’t.. LOS AL AMOS, NEW ME XIC~ q7’Q~ J- II An Affirmative Action/Equal Oppo I P“-”-”~ uNITED STATES ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION CONTRACT W.7405-ENG. 36 This work was supported by the US Air Force Armament Laboratory (AFATL), Eglin AFB, Florida, under the US Energy Research and Development Administration Reimbursable Project R441. -. ,3: F.%::,Y:*:S”G:C::::;,:EZ: nor IIK ltnitrd S1. !rII Knems %se. r.h ●nd l)Iw-I. mat Ad. ml.i.t..ti. m.nor . of Ih.lt ernpl.wx.s. nor .m. OR,., .. lrwtw.. .ubmntr..lor.. w tht.lr ,m,lowes. rn.ka am, w.rr..l*. .. P.... or implitd . ..meb .nv Icc.1 li.h81i@b or mmn. tihilsls. r.r th. .-U-C*. convleten”.. or umefulm-. of ..,. I. f.rm.t,,,..,.pp. r.tu., pmdw. or prm-a. dlwlacd. or WV.*W th.1 II* usc w..M no! in fti. m DAMA owned riaht.. HAZARD CLASSIFICATION TEST OF MIXED-LOAD 30-mm GAU-8 AMMUNITION BY BONFIRE COOKOFF AND SYMPATHETIC DETONATION TESTING by J. C. Elder, M. I. TMery, and H. J. Ettinger Industrial Hygiene Group Health “Division Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory University of California Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545 ABSTRACT A hazard classification test of mixed-load (high explosive and armor- - l_ piercing) 30-mm GAU-8 ammu&ion was performed in October, 1976, for the ecJJ U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering Geology Field Manual
    Chapter 19 BLAST DESIGN Introduction This chapter is an introduction to blasting techniques based primarily on the Explosives and Blasting Procedures Manual (Dick et al., 1987) and the Blaster’s Handbook (E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc., 1978). Blast design is not a precise science. Because of widely varying properties of rock, geologic structure, and explo- sives, design of a blasting program requires field testing. Tradeoffs frequently must be made when designing the best blast for a given geologic situation. This chapter provides the fundamental concepts of blast design. These concepts are useful as a first approximation for blast design and also in troubleshooting the cause of a bad blast. Field testing is the best tool to refine individual blast designs. Throughout the blast design process, two overriding prin- ciples must be kept in mind: (1) Explosives function best when there is a free face approximately parallel to the explosive column at the time of detonation. (2) There must be adequate space for the broken rock to move and expand. Excessive confinement of explosives is the leading cause of poor blasting results such as backbreak, ground vibrations, airblast, unbroken toe, flyrock, and poor fragmentation. Properties and Geology of the Rock Mass The rock mass properties are the single most critical variable affecting the design and results of a blast. The FIELD MANUAL rock properties are very qualitative and cannot be suffi- ciently quantified numerically when applied to blast design. Rock properties often vary greatly from one end of a construction job to another. Explosive selection, blast design, and delay pattern must consider the specific rock mass being blasted.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Explosive Ordnance Disposal Symposium & Exhibition
    2019 GLOBAL EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL SYMPOSIUM & EXHIBITION Innovation for the Future Month X, 201X Location City, STATE NDIA.org/XXX August 6 – 8 | Bethesda, MD | NDIA.org/GlobalEOD EXPLOSION CONTAINMENT EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL CONTACT US THIOT INGENIERIE [email protected] 830 route Nationale + 33 (0) 5 65 38 36 07 46130 - PUYBRUN FRANCE www.thiot-detonics.com 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS WHO WE ARE .................3 WHO WE ARE WELCOME LETTER .............4 The National Defense Industrial Association is the trusted leader in defense and national security associations. As a 501(c)(3) corporate and individual ....... SCHEDULE AT A GLANCE 4 membership association, NDIA engages thoughtful and innovative leaders to exchange ideas, information, and capabilities that lead to the development of EVENT INFORMATION ..........5 the best policies, practices, products, and technologies to ensure the safety and security of our nation. NDIA’s membership embodies the full spectrum AGENDA ..................... 6 of corporate, government, academic, and individual stakeholders who form a vigorous, responsive, and collaborative community in support of defense and national security. NDIA is proud to celebrate 100 years in support of our BIOGRAPHIES .................18 warfighters and national security. The technology used by today’s modern warfighter was unimaginable 100 years ago. In 1919, BG Benedict Crowell’s EXHIBITOR INFORMATION ......19 vision of a collaborative team working at the intersection of science, industry, government, and defense began what was to become the National Defense VENUE MAP ................. 26 Industrial Association. For the past century, NDIA and its predecessor organizations have been at the heart of the mission by dedicating their time, expertise, and energy to ensuring our warfighters have the best training, equipment, and support.
    [Show full text]
  • EOD® 10E Bomb Suit Ensemble
    EOD® 10E Bomb Suit Ensemble USER MANUAL 8002666 Rev B IMPORTANT Please review the enclosed USB drive. It includes the User Video and other helpful instructions in PDF: • User Video • User Manual • Quick Reference Guide for the Remote Control Unit (RCU) • ESD Guide Med-Eng strongly recommends watching the User Video and reviewing each document for important information on this equipment. Additionally, the section on Critical Information for Donning on page 24 is essential to understanding the proper donning technique for the EOD 10E Ensemble. Always connect and power up the suit and helmet electronics in the proper sequence via the remote control to avoid unnecessary warnings/alarms. Always turn off the suit and helmet electronics via the remote control before disconnecting the helmet to avoid unnecessary warnings/alarms. After closing face shield, attempt to lift face shield up to ensure it is in the locked position. Never mix ‘AA’ battery types: always use either 24 alkaline, or 24 NiMH rechargeable that have the same measured voltage. Ensure the batteries are inserted in the correct orientation. Use of new fresh stock commercial quality batteries is strongly recommended. If the helmet is connected, and the ventilation fan is automatically running at full speed and it cannot be decreased, simply turn off the RCU, disconnect the battery, then reconnect the battery and restart the RCU. QUICK REFERENCES The voice commands are listed in “VOICE COMMAND SYSTEM RULES” on page 96 Troubleshooting the RCU starts in “TROUBLESHOOTING” on page 98 EOD® 10E Ensemble USER MANUAL Proprietary Statements Med-Eng is committed to continual product improvement and, thus, reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to make changes to products without prior notice.
    [Show full text]
  • 6 S 0 T F 9Cn (Avo,C,$)?.,?__
    HQ NATIONAL SECURITY GUARD (Provisioning Branch : Ord Section) PLACING OF DRAFT QRs AND TRIAL DIRECTIVES OF BOMB SUIT 1. Please refer PM Division, MHA letter No. IV-24011/14/2016-Prov.l-2405 dated 05 Oct 2017, letter No. 1V-24011/12/2011-Prov.1 dated 13 Jun 2012 and letter No 11012/02/2009- Fin-l/Prov-1-17 dated 02 Jan 2018. 2. Meeting of sub group of technical experts was held on 23 Feb 2021 at 1030 in the conference Hall, HQ NSG for the QRs and Trial Directives of Bomp Suit. 3. The sub group during the meeting opined that the QRs and Trial Directives of Bomb Suit be placed on MHA as well as NSG website for 15 days to invite vendor comments/ suggestions. 4. As per PM Division, letter under reference, the draft QRs and Trial Directives of Bomb Suit is forwarded herewith in hard and soft copy as per appendix attached for hosting on the MHA website. 6 (Rakesh Kumar) Group Commander Encls :- As above. Technical Director, NIC, North Block, New Delhi No. P/604/19(389)/BomB Suit/Prov (Ord)/HQ NSG !WI Dated, theOL_Mar 2021 S 0 T f 9cn (Avo,c,$)?.,?__ INVITATION OF VENDOR COMMENTS ON QR/ TDs OF BOMB SUIT 1. It is intimated that firms/ vendors' comments are invited on the QR/ TDs of Bomb Suit. All firms are requested to offer their comments on e-mail address scordna or qcprocAnsq.qov.in in under mention format. QRs TDs Comments by the firm 2. You are requested to offer comments within 15 days from the date of uploading on the website.
    [Show full text]
  • Operations Manual
    Operations Manual San Diego County Sheriff's Department Bomb/Arson Unit Operations Manual November 2019 This operations manual has been written to form guidelines for the functioning of the Bomb/Arson Unit. This document is subordinate to the San Diego Sheriff's Department Policy and Procedures manual. All employees assigned to the Bomb/Arson Unit will read, adhere to and be held accountable for the contents of this operations manual. This manual addresses issues of Departmental interface, such as personnel matters, as well as general and specific operations. All members of the Bomb/Arson Unit are encouraged to submit revisions or proposals to add/delete or make changes to this manual. Revisions to this manual must be reviewed and approved by the Emergency Services Captain through the chain of command. A full review of this manual will be conducted in January of odd numbered years. Bomb/Arson Unit Page 1 of 24 Operations Manual Bomb/Arson Unit Operations Manual Table of Contents 1.0 Administration 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Policy 1.3 Goal 1.4 Mission 2.0 Personnel 2.1 Duties and Responsibilities 2.2 Selection and Screening Process 2.3 Bomb/Arson Detective in Training 2.4 Physical Fitness 2.5 Physical Examinations 2.6 Call-out Responsibilities 2.7 Use of Alcohol or Medication 3.0 Training 3.1 Purpose 3.2 Policy 3.3 Minimum Basic Training 3.4 Minimum Specialized Training 3.5 Recertification and In-service Training 4.0 Safety Procedures 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Purpose 4.3 Situational Analysis 4.4 Safety Principles 4.5 Range Safety 4.6 Explosive Magazines
    [Show full text]
  • EOD (Explosive Ordnance Disposal) Terminology Ammunition A
    EOD (Explosive Ordnance Disposal) Terminology Ammunition A complete device charged with explosives, propellants, pyrotechnics, initiating composition, or nuclear, biological or chemical material for use in military operations, including demolitions. [AAP-6] Note: In common usage, ‘munitions’ (plural) can be military weapons, ammunition and equipment. Anti-Personnel Mines A mine designed to be exploded by the presence, proximity or contact of a person and that will incapacitate, injure or kill one or more persons. Note: Mines designed to be detonated by the presence, proximity or contact of a vehicle as opposed to a person that are equipped with anti-handling devices, are not considered APM as a result of being so equipped. [APMBC] Alternative Disposal Techniques Explosive engineering techniques developed to facilitate Conventional Munition Disposal (CMD) without necessarily resorting to high order detonation in the first instance. Battle Area Clearance Battle Area Clearance (BAC) is the systematic and controlled clearance of hazardous areas where the hazards are known not to include mines Blind Explosive ordnance which has been primed, fuzed, armed, initiated or otherwise prepared for action, and which has been dropped, fired, launched, projected, or placed in such a manner as to constitute a hazard to personnel or material and remains unexploded either by malfunction or design, or for any other cause. Booby Trap An explosive, or non-explosive device, deliberately hidden with the intent of causing casualties when an apparently harmless object is disturbed or a normally safe act is performed. Brissance The shattering effect shown by a detonating explosive to an adjacent non-explosive material. Burning The propagation of an exothermic reaction through an explosive material.
    [Show full text]