DOCSLIB.ORG

United Nations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
United Nations UNITED NATIONS International Tribunal for the Case No. IT-03-66-T Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Date: 30 November 2005 Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of Former Yugoslavia since 1991 Original: English IN TRIAL CHAMBER II Before: Judge Kevin Parker, Presiding Judge Krister Thelin Judge Christine Van Den Wyngaert Registrar: Mr Hans Holthuis Judgement of: 30 November 2005 PROSECUTOR v. FATMIR LIMAJ HARADIN BALA ISAK MUSLIU JUDGEMENT The Office of the Prosecutor: Mr Alex Whiting Mr Julian Nicholls Mr Colin Black Mr Milbert Shin Counsel for the Accused: Mr Michael Mansfield Q.C. and Mr Karim A.A. Khan for Fatmir Limaj Mr Gregor D. Guy-Smith and Mr Richard Harvey for Haradin Bala Mr Michael Topolski Q.C. and Mr Steven Powles for Isak Musliu CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................1 II. CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING THE EVALUATION OF EVIDENCE........................4 III. CONTEXT .................................................................................................................................16 A. POLITICAL CONTEXT IN KOSOVO AND EMERGENCE OF THE KLA...............................................16 B. DEVELOPMENT OF THE KLA UNITS IN VARIOUS REGIONS OF KOSOVO .......................................21 C. TAKING OF LLAPUSHNIK/LAPUSNIK BY THE KLA IN MAY 1998................................................27 D. THE FALL OF LLAPUSHNIK/LAPUSNIK IN JULY 1998 ..................................................................32 IV. JURISDICTION UNDER ARTICLES 3 AND 5 OF THE STATUTE................................34 A. JURISDICTION UNDER ARTICLE 3................................................................................................34 1. The existence of an armed conflict and nexus.......................................................................34 (a) Law......................................................................................................................................... 34 (b) Findings.................................................................................................................................. 38 (i) Organisation of the KLA .................................................................................................... 38 (ii) Intensity of the conflict...................................................................................................... 52 (iii) Conclusion........................................................................................................................ 62 2. The Four Tadi} conditions.....................................................................................................63 B. JURISDICTION UNDER ARTICLE 5................................................................................................65 1. Law ........................................................................................................................................65 2. Findings .................................................................................................................................69 V. THE CHARGES .........................................................................................................................81 A. LAW ON THE CRIMES CHARGED ..................................................................................................81 1. Introduction............................................................................................................................81 2. Crimes against humanity (Counts 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9)................................................................82 3. Cruel treatment (Counts 2 and 6)...........................................................................................82 4. Torture (Count 4) ...................................................................................................................83 5. Murder (Counts 8 and 10)......................................................................................................85 B. FINDINGS....................................................................................................................................85 1. Existence of a prison camp in Llapushnik/Lapusnik .............................................................85 2. Crimes in or around the Llapushnik/Lapusnik prison camp (Counts 4, 6 and 8) ................106 (a) Conditions of detention ........................................................................................................ 107 (b) Cruel treatment, torture and murder..................................................................................... 109 (i) Vojko and Ivan Bakrač ..................................................................................................... 109 (ii) Witness L07..................................................................................................................... 111 (iii) Witness L10.................................................................................................................... 112 (iv) Witness L06 .................................................................................................................... 114 (v) Witness L96 ..................................................................................................................... 115 (vi) Witness L04 .................................................................................................................... 116 (vii) Witness L12................................................................................................................... 117 (viii) Ajet Gashi..................................................................................................................... 119 (ix) Fehmi Xhema (also known as Fehmi Tafa).................................................................... 122 (x) Milovan Krsti} and Miodrag Krsti}................................................................................. 127 (xi) Slobodan Mitrovi} .......................................................................................................... 129 (xii) Miroslav [uljini} ........................................................................................................... 130 (xiii) @ivorad Krsti}............................................................................................................... 132 (xiv) Stamen Genov............................................................................................................... 134 (xv) \or|e ^uk...................................................................................................................... 138 (xvi) Sini{a Blagojevi} .......................................................................................................... 140 (xvii) Jefta Petkovi} and Zvonko Marinkovi}....................................................................... 140 (xviii) Agim Ademi ............................................................................................................... 144 (xix) Vesel Ahmeti ................................................................................................................ 146 (xx) Emin Emini .................................................................................................................... 148 (xxi) Ibush Hamza ................................................................................................................. 151 (xxii) Hyzri Harjizi ................................................................................................................ 152 (xxiii) Shaban Hoti ................................................................................................................ 153 (xxiv) Hasan Hoxha............................................................................................................... 156 (xxv) Safet Hysenaj ............................................................................................................... 157 (xxvi) Bashkim Rashiti.......................................................................................................... 158 (xxvii) Hetem Rexhaj ............................................................................................................ 159 (xxviii) Lutfi Xhemshiti......................................................................................................... 162 (xxix) Shyqyri Zymeri........................................................................................................... 163 3. Crimes in the Berishe/Berisa Mountains (Count 10)...........................................................165 (a) Emin Emini .......................................................................................................................... 171 (b) Ibush Hamza ........................................................................................................................ 172 (c) Hyzri Harjizi......................................................................................................................... 174 (d) Shaban Hoti.......................................................................................................................... 175 (e) Hasan Hoxha ........................................................................................................................ 177 (f) Safet Hysenaj.......................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • UNDER ORDERS: War Crimes in Kosovo Order Online
    UNDER ORDERS: War Crimes in Kosovo Order online Table of Contents Acknowledgments Introduction Glossary 1. Executive Summary The 1999 Offensive The Chain of Command The War Crimes Tribunal Abuses by the KLA Role of the International Community 2. Background Introduction Brief History of the Kosovo Conflict Kosovo in the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Kosovo in the 1990s The 1998 Armed Conflict Conclusion 3. Forces of the Conflict Forces of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Yugoslav Army Serbian Ministry of Internal Affairs Paramilitaries Chain of Command and Superior Responsibility Stucture and Strategy of the KLA Appendix: Post-War Promotions of Serbian Police and Yugoslav Army Members 4. march–june 1999: An Overview The Geography of Abuses The Killings Death Toll,the Missing and Body Removal Targeted Killings Rape and Sexual Assault Forced Expulsions Arbitrary Arrests and Detentions Destruction of Civilian Property and Mosques Contamination of Water Wells Robbery and Extortion Detentions and Compulsory Labor 1 Human Shields Landmines 5. Drenica Region Izbica Rezala Poklek Staro Cikatovo The April 30 Offensive Vrbovac Stutica Baks The Cirez Mosque The Shavarina Mine Detention and Interrogation in Glogovac Detention and Compusory Labor Glogovac Town Killing of Civilians Detention and Abuse Forced Expulsion 6. Djakovica Municipality Djakovica City Phase One—March 24 to April 2 Phase Two—March 7 to March 13 The Withdrawal Meja Motives: Five Policeman Killed Perpetrators Korenica 7. Istok Municipality Dubrava Prison The Prison The NATO Bombing The Massacre The Exhumations Perpetrators 8. Lipljan Municipality Slovinje Perpetrators 9. Orahovac Municipality Pusto Selo 10. Pec Municipality Pec City The “Cleansing” Looting and Burning A Final Killing Rape Cuska Background The Killings The Attacks in Pavljan and Zahac The Perpetrators Ljubenic 11.
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLIC Date Original: 26/10/2020 19:18:00 Date Corrected Version: 28/10/2020 14:39:00 Date Public Redacted Version: 05/11/2020 16:53:00
    KSC-BC-2020-06/F00027/A08/COR/RED/1 of 5 PUBLIC Date original: 26/10/2020 19:18:00 Date corrected version: 28/10/2020 14:39:00 Date public redacted version: 05/11/2020 16:53:00 In: KSC-BC-2020-06 Before: Pre-Trial Judge Judge Nicolas Guillou Registrar: Dr Fidelma Donlon Date: 26 October 2020 Language: English Classification: Public Public Redacted Version of Corrected Version of Order for Transfer to Detention Facilities of the Specialist Chambers Specialist Prosecutor Defence for Jakup Krasniqi Jack Smith To be served on Jakup Krasniqi KSC-BC-2020-06/F00027/A08/COR/RED/2 of 5 PUBLIC Date original: 26/10/2020 19:18:00 Date corrected version: 28/10/2020 14:39:00 Date public redacted version: 05/11/2020 16:53:00 I, JUDGE NICOLAS GUILLOU, Pre-Trial Judge of the Kosovo Specialist Chambers, assigned by the President of the Specialist Chambers pursuant to Article 33(1)(a) of Law No. 05/L-53 on Specialist Chambers and Specialist Prosecutor’s Office (“Law”); BEING SEISED of the strictly confidential and ex parte “Submission of Indictment for Confirmation”, dated 24 April 2020, “Request for Arrest Warrants and Related Orders”, dated 28 May 2020, and “Submission of Revised Indictment for Confirmation”, dated 24 July 2020, of the Specialist Prosecutor’s Office (“SPO”); HAVING CONFIRMED, in the “Decision on the Confirmation of the Indictment Against Hashim Thaçi, Kadri Veseli, Rexhep Selimi and Jakup Krasniqi”, dated 26 October 2020, the Revised Indictment (“Confirmed Indictment”) and having found therein that there is a well-grounded suspicion that
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded 4.0 License
    Security and Human Rights (2020) 1-5 Book Review ∵ Daan W. Everts (with a foreword by Jaap de Hoop Scheffer), Peacekeeping in Albania and Kosovo; Conflict response and international intervention in the Western Balkans, 1997 – 2002 (I.B.Tauris, July 2020), 228p. £. 13,99 paperback Fortunately, at the international scene there are those characters who venture into complex crises and relentlessly work for their solution. Sergio Viero de Melo seems to be their icon. Certainly, Daan Everts, the author of Peacekeeping in Albania and Kosovo belongs to this exceptional group of pragmatic crisis managers in the field. Between 1997 and 2002 he was the osce’s represent- ative in crisis-hit Albania and Kosovo. Now, twenty years later, Mr Everts has published his experiences, and luckily so; the book is rich in content and style, and should become obligatory reading for prospective diplomats and military officers; and it certainly is interesting material for veterans of all sorts. Everts presents the vicissitudes of his life in Tirana and Pristina against the background of adequate introductions to Albanian and Kosovar history, which offer no new insights or facts. All in all, the book is a sublime primary source of diplomatic practice. The largest, and clearly more interesting part of the book is devoted to the intervention in Kosovo. As a matter of fact, the 1999 war in Kosovo deepened ethnic tensions in the territory. Therefore, the author says, the mission in Kosovo was highly complex, also because the mandate was ambivalent with regard to Kosovo’s final status. Furthermore, the international community (Everts clearly does not like that term) for the time being had to govern Kosovo as a protectorate.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Between the President and Constitutional Court and Its Influence on the Functioning of the Constitutional System in Kosovo Msc
    Report between the President and Constitutional Court and its influence on the functioning of the Constitutional System in Kosovo MSc. Florent Muçaj, PhD Candidate Faculty of Law, University of Prishtina, Kosovo MSc. Luz Balaj, PhD Candidate Faculty of Law, University of Prishtina, Kosovo Abstract This paper aims at clarifying the report between the President and the Constitutional Court. If we take as a starting point the constitutional mandate of these two institutions it follows that their final mission is the same, i.e., the protection and safeguarding of the constitutional system. This paper, thus, will clarify the key points in which this report is expressed. Further, this paper examines the theoretical aspects of the report between the President and the Constitutional Court, starting from the debate over this issue between Karl Schmitt and Hans Kelsen. An important part of the paper will examine the Constitution of Kosovo, i.e., the contents of the constitutional norm and its application. The analysis focuses on the role such report between the two institutions has on the functioning of the constitutional system. In analyzing the case of Kosovo, this paper examines Constitutional Court cases in which the report between the President and the Constitutional Court has been an issue of review. Such cases assist us in clarifying the main theme of this paper. Therefore, the reader will be able to understand the key elements of the report between the President as a representative of the unity of the people on the one hand and the Constitutional Court as a guarantor of constitutionality on the other hand.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Notes Introduction 1. The term ‘humanitarian war’ was first coined by Adam Roberts. See his, ‘Humanitarian War: Intervention and Human Rights’, International Affairs, 69(2), 1993 and, ‘NATO’s Humanitarian War Over Kosovo’, Survival, 41(3), 1999. 2. The issue of intra-alliance politics is discussed throughout Pierre Martin and Mark R. Brawley (eds), Alliance Politics, Kosovo, and NATO’s War: Allied Force or Forced Allies? (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2000). 3. Formally recognised by the EU and UN as the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM) but referred to as Macedonia throughout. 4. The idea of the ‘court of world opinion’ was put to me by Nicholas Wheeler. See Nicholas J. Wheeler, Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000). 5. Trotsky is cited by Noel Malcolm, Kosovo: A Short History (London: Papermac, 1999), p. 253. 6. Ibid. 7. Ibid., pp. 324–6. For a general overview of the key aspects of the conflict see Arshi Pipa and Sami Repishti, Studies on Kosova (New York: Columbia University Press, 1984), Robert Elsie (ed.), Kosovo: In the Heart of the Powder Keg (New York: Columbia University Press, 1997). 8. See Lenard J. Cohen, Broken Bonds: Yugoslavia’s Disintegration and Balkan Politics in Transition, 2nd edn (Oxford: Westview, 1995), p. 33. 9. Article 4 of the Constitution of the Socialist Autonomous Province of Kosovo, 1974. See Marc Weller, The Crisis in Kosovo 1989–1999: From the Dissolution of Yugoslavia to Rambouillet and the Outbreak of Hostilities (Cambridge: International Documents and Analysis, 1999), p. 58. 10. Article 6 of the Kosovo Constitution, 1974.
    [Show full text]
  • Briefing Notes KW46 2020 Englisch
    Briefing Notes Group 62 – Information Centre for Asylum and Migration 9 November 2020 Afghanistan Fighting, attacks, civilian victims The fighting that began on 11 November 2020 in the southern province of Helmand is continuing, particularly in the districts of Nawa-e-Barakziay, Nad-e-Ali, Lashkargah and Nahr-e-Saraj. Some 13,970 internally displaced persons (IDPs) have been registered since then (as of 5 November 2020); partner organisations of the United Nations are trying to provide relief. Several hospitals have been closed, others have reached their capacity limits. Heavy fighting has also been reported from parts of Kandahar and Uruzgan provinces. In Kandahar, 16,000 new internally displaced persons (IDPs) have been counted (as of 5 November 2020), some of them coming from Helmand and Uruzgan provinces. Several aid organisations have had to cease their activities in parts of these provinces. The Armed Conflict Location & Event Data (ACLED) Project reports a total of 783 security incidents in 31 provinces in October 2020, which is an increase of 209 compared to September. NATO reports that the number of civilians killed or injured increased in every quarter of the year. In the third quarter, 2,561 civilians were killed or injured, which is an increase of 43 percent compared to the previous quarter. In an attack by ISKP fighters on the premises of Kabul University in the morning of 2 November 2020 (see BN of 2 November 2020), clashes with security forces lasted for hours, leaving at least 22 people dead and over 40 injured. Most of the victims were students.
    [Show full text]
  • Gesprek Datum: Donderdag 21 April 2011 Tijd: 10.15 - 11.00 Uur Openbaar/Besloten: Openbaar
    Den Haag, 9 maart 2011 Voortouwcommissie: vaste commissie voor Europese Zaken Volgcommissie(s): Activiteit: Gesprek Datum: donderdag 21 april 2011 Tijd: 10.15 - 11.00 uur Openbaar/besloten: openbaar Onderwerp: Gesprek met de Voorzitter van het Parlement van Kosovo, de heer Krasniqi De Voorzitter van het Parlement van Kosovo, Jakup Krasniqi, zal van 9.45 – 10.15 uur worden ontvangen door de Voorzitter van de Tweede Kamer. Aansluitend vindt een gesprek plaats met de commissie voor Europese Zaken in de Den Uylzaal. Naast de actuele politieke situatie in Kosovo zal met de Parlementsvoorzitter gesproken kunnen worden over de betrekkingen met Servië (in het licht van EU-toetredingsperspectief van dat land), de internationale erkenning van Kosovo en de toekomstige EU-lidmaatschapsaspiraties van Kosovo zelf en het aanstaande werkbezoek vanuit de commissie EUZA aan Kosovo. Voertaal: Engels Het C.V. van de heer Krasniqi is bijgevoegd. Aanmeldingen voor deze activiteit kan via Parlis met de knop “Inschrijving”op het tabblad “Deelnemers”van deze Parlisactiviteit Griffier: J.J.P. Nijssen Activiteitnummer: 2011A00947 Jakup Krasniqi Functions in the Assembly of Kosovo • Assembly President • PDK Group Party • Democratic Party of Kosovo (PDK) Personal Data • Date of birth 01/01/1951 in Fatos/Drenas • Married, 4 children, 3 daughter and 1 son Education • 1957–1965 Primary School, in Fatos (Negroc) in Arllat • 1966–1971 Secondary School in Prishtina • 1972–1976 Philological Faculty, branch of History in Prishtina • 1995–1997 Post-Graduate Studies at Philosophical Faculty, Branch of History at the University of Prishtina in Prishtina • 22.11.2003 Defence of Masters Dissertation at the Universitity of Kosova; topic: “Political Movement and Army Resistence in Kosova1991–1999“.
    [Show full text]
  • An Army for Kosovo?
    AN ARMY FOR KOSOVO? Europe Report N°174 – 28 July 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................. i I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 II. THE INTERIM SECURITY ARCHITECTURE........................................................ 1 A. THE OFFICIAL SECURITY CAPACITY......................................................................................2 1. Indigenous bodies created and overseen by UNMIK ................................................2 2. Kosovo government capacity.....................................................................................4 B. AGENTS OF INTERNAL INSTABILITY ......................................................................................6 1. Informal Albanian actors ...........................................................................................6 2. Serb structures and the north .....................................................................................8 C. INTERNATIONAL SECURITY FORCES ......................................................................................9 1. KFOR.......................................................................................................................10 2. UNMIK police.........................................................................................................10 III. THE KOSOVO PROTECTION CORPS: ALBATROSS OR CINDERELLA?.... 12 A. MANDATE...........................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of the Development of Post-War Political Parties in Kosovo
    From Guerillas to Cabinets - A Study of the Development of Post-War Political Parties in Kosovo Master Thesis Mariana Qamile Rød University of Bergen Department of Comparative Politics i Abstract The fourth Yugoslav war, the war in Kosovo, was fought between 1998 and 1999. The Kosovo Liberation Army and the Armed Forces of the Republic of Kosovo, fought the Serb police, military and paramilitary forces, but also at some points each other. The war was a battle between a Kosovan guerilla uprising, against a far superior Serb military power. The game changed as the international community, and most importantly NATO, intervened to put an end to the war. The KLA was a rapidly growing, sporadically organized guerilla movement. It was established as a result of increasing oppression from the Milosevic regime against the Kosovo Albanians, as a more radical faction than the pacifist Albanian resistance movement, LDK. Despite of their problems, the KLA became national heroes, and their political successors are still in 2017 dominating the political arena. This thesis main research question is; "How has the war legacy affected the development of political parties in post-conflict Kosovo?" To answer my research question, I conducted 22 qualitative interviews with Kosovan ex-combatants and politicians, in addition to an extensive document analysis. Through five different theoretical frameworks, each highlighting different important aspects affecting the development of political parties in a post-conflict state, I tried to uncover which processes and actors have been decisive in this regard. The five theories yield important results on their own, but when combined, it becomes obvious how these processes are not linear and multidimensional.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategy and Action Plan for Biodiversity 2011 – 2020
    Republika e Kosovës Republika Kosova - Republic of Kosovo Qeveria – Vlada - Government Ministria e Mjedisit dhe Planifikimit Hapësinor Ministarstvo Sredine i Prostornog Planiranja Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning Strategy and Action Plan for Biodiversity 2011 – 2020 Department of Environment Protection Prishtina “Humans are part of nature’s rich diversity and have power to protect or destroy it” Main message from Secretariat of CBD for the year 2010 to the world's decision makers. 2 ACNOWLEDGEMENT Strategy and Action Plan for Biodiversity of Republic of Kosovo 2011 – 2020 is a result of 16 (sixteen) months work of Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning, supported from the European Commission through TAIEX. Project supervision was done by Steering Committee, leaded by Minister of MESP. This strategy is drafted, based on the Report on the state of natureon 2006 – 2007 and 2008 - 2009 prepared by KEPA and also from reports from other sectors with impact on biodiversity. In drafting of Strategy and Action Plan for Biodiversity of Republic of Kosovo 2011 – 2020 have contributed a large number of experts from governmental institutions, science and civil society. Working group was created with a Decision of Permanent Secretary of MESP nr. 03/711/1 of date 04.03.2009. List of experts that were engaged in drafting the Strategy and Action Plan for Biodiversity is added in ANNEX 1. Contribution of all members was essential during the drafting of this strategic document so all the members which with their engagement have contributed, we express our acknowledgement and we sincerely thank them. Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning thank also the European Commission that through TAIEX DG Enlargement (Technical Assistance Information Exchange) with experts and other logistic had supported this project.
    [Show full text]
  • [ 2006 ] Part 1 Chapter 5 Europe and the Mediterranean
    452 Political and security questions Chapter V Europe and the Mediterranean The restoration of peace and stability in the post- Kosovo in August when its Government adopted a conflict countries in the Europe and Mediterranean European Partnership Action Plan. In November, region advanced in 2006, as efforts to re-establish the Secretary-General’s Special Envoy for the fu- their institutions and social and economic infra- ture status of Kosovo announced that the presenta- structure continued. However, a number of issues tion of the Settlement Proposal would be delayed remained unresolved. until the end of January 2007 to allow for the hold- Led by the European Union (eu), the interna- ing of parliamentary elections in Serbia. tional community continued to assist Bosnia and In a historic referendum in May, Montenegro Herzegovina to move towards full integration voted to separate from Serbia. In June, the General into Europe through the eu Stabilization and Assembly welcomed Montenegro to membership in Association Process. The country adopted an eu the United Nations. integration strategy, its first long-term strategic Renewed efforts were made to end the stalemate document leading towards full eu membership, and in the Georgian Abkhaz peace process. During the made progress in meeting the North Atlantic Treaty year, the Special Representative of the Secretary- Organization Partnership for Peace requirements, General in Georgia convened the first session of which culminated in an invitation for Bosnia and the resumed Coordination Council of the Georgian Herzegovina to join the Partnership. In October, and Abkhaz sides, which had not met since 2001. domestic authorities successfully carried out the Senior officials of the Group of Friends of the country’s first self-organized general elections since Secretary-General (France, Germany, Russian the war ended in 1995.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Ethnic Groups Rebel
    Why Ethnic Groups Rebel: Intra-ethnic Division, Dynamic Grievances, State Repression and Escalation Keiichi KUBO Thesis submitted for the degree of PhD in Political Science London School of Economics and Political Science Department of Government London, 2007 1 \ UMI Number: U501706 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U501706 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 {■ 6? 6 4 - &A, \im *4- :btbH gqutnOyindl3 vri W t^anK79hO oimftn/fl nobr/id aindio-B'rtnl iio h d im 3 bne noi0«3iqs^l OflUi' ifbibX to osigoh 3ffj lot bstfjimdu* zi^riT ooivjio?. LeomloH ni Gricl oonob8 IsdrliloH brm .goimonooH r!'o loorb2 riobnoJ JnornrnovoO 'to tnomttBq >(I U)()i nobno.l Library jjrii& rrnr.'i *: '■” • Declaration I hereby certify that the work presented in the thesis is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others. Tokyo, 30 November, 2007 KeiichiKUBO 2 Abstract Why do ethnic groups rebel against the state? While there have been various efforts to answer this question, existing explanations tend to be static and based on the unitary actor assumption.
    [Show full text]