Youth and Public Policy in Serbia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Youth and Public Policy in Serbia YOUTH POLICY REVIEW SERIES Youth and Public Policy in Serbia Recently, Serbia has made significant strides in developing policies that respond to the concerns of its youth. The adoption of a national Law on Youth in 2011 was a significant step forward in the realization of young people’s rights. But young people continue to face significant obstacles on the road from childhood to adulthood. Youth and Public Policy in Serbia sheds light on the opportunities and challenges confronting young people in Serbia. About the Youth Policy Review Series Tanja Azanjac Donatella Bradic This review series researches and analyzes public policies affecting youth. Djordje Krivokapic Many countries have stated their youth policies, but are they executing Marlene Spoerri them? Do these policies allow young people to achieve their rights? How do youth policies interact with broader policies that affect young people? Tatjana Stojic Country-specific titles lay out the evidence on which young people, their organizations, and the entire youth sector, can advocate for the adoption and implementation of sound national and international youth policies, and hold governments, agencies and donors to account on the promises they make to young people. Youth and Public Policy in ISBN 9783944859040 Serbia A publication of WWW.YOUTHPOLICY.ORG/REVIEWS 9 783944 859040 Youth Policy Press YOUTH POLICY REVIEW SERIES Youth and Public Policy in Serbia A publication of Youth Policy Press Research Team International Editorial Board Tanja Azanjac Robert Thomson Donatella Bradic Djordje Krivokapić Project Coordination Tatjana Stojic Yael Ohana Milosz Czerniejewski Local Coordinator Andreas Karsten Tatjana Stojic John Muir International Advisor Marlene Spoerri Copyright © 2014 by Youth Policy Press www.youthpolicypress.com First edition printed in 2012 Second edition printed in 2014 This youth policy review has been generously supported by the Open Society Foundations · www.opensocietyfoundations.org ISBN 978-3-944859-04-0 Design by Maximilian Kall This work is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 carbon neutral Printed by Druckerei Lokay in Reinheim, natureOffice.comcarbon | DE-344-005716 neutral natureOffice.com | DE-344-005716 Germany, on 100% recovered paper printprint production production with EU Ecolabel Youth Policy Press, Alt-Moabit 89, DG, D-10559 Berlin Tel +49 30 394 052 555, Fax +49 30 394 052 505 [email protected] III Contents Executive Summary 1 1 Introduction 1.1 Rationale for the Pilot Review 8 1.2 Rationale for the Review in Serbia 9 1.3 Objectives 10 1.4 Methods and Approach 11 1.5 Challenges and Limitations 12 1.6 Conclusions 13 2 Background on Youth 2.1 Introduction 18 2.2 Context 18 2.3 Key Issues Affecting Young People 23 2.3.1 Leisure Time 24 2.3.2 Access to Information 26 2.3.3 Employment 27 2.3.4 Mobility and Migration 31 2.3.5 Education 33 2.3.6 Health 36 2.3.7 Participation 39 2.3.8 Crime and Violence 43 2.4 Youth Visibility 47 2.5 Conclusion 49 IV 3 Youth and Public Policy 3.1 Introduction 52 3.2 Key Definitions 52 3.3 Development of Youth Policy 53 3.3.1 Youth Policy in Tito’s Yugoslavia 53 3.3.2 Youth Policy in Milosevic’s Serbia 56 3.3.3 Youth Policy, 2000–2007 57 3.3.4 Youth Policy, 2007–2011 59 3.4 Youth Policy in 2012 61 3.4.1 National Youth Strategy 62 3.4.2 National Youth Action Plan 66 3.4.3 Law on Youth 67 3.4.4 Local Youth Action Plans 69 3.4.5 Intersectoral Legislation Dealing with Youth 70 3.5 Institutions for Implementation 71 3.5.1 Ministry of Youth and Sport 71 3.5.2 National Youth Council 72 3.5.3 Local Youth Councils 73 3.5.4 Local Youth Offices 73 3.5.5 Agency for Youth 75 3.5.6 Civil Society 75 3.6 Financing 76 3.7 Monitoring and Evaluation 77 3.8 International Support and Alignment with International Standards 78 3.9 Conclusion 80 4 Intersectoral Coordination 4.1 Introduction 84 4.2 Coordination Mechanisms 84 4.3 Employment 85 4.3.1 Institutions 86 4.3.2 Policies 87 4.3.3 Implementation and Outcomes 91 4.4 Health 96 V 4.4.1 Policies 97 4.4.2 Implementation and Coherence 98 4.4.3 Monitoring and Evaluation 100 4.4.4 Outcomes and Effectiveness 101 4.5 Formal Education 103 4.5.1 Policies 104 4.5.2 Institutions 106 4.5.3 Implementation and Outcomes 107 4.6 Nonformal Education 110 4.6.1 Institutions 111 4.6.2 Policies 113 4.6.3 Resources 114 4.7 Conclusion 115 5 Vulnerable Groups 5.1 Introduction 118 5.2 Groups Recognized in Policy 118 5.3 Groups Overlooked by Policy 130 5.4 Conclusion 133 6 Conclusion 6.1 Introduction 136 6.2 Steps Forward 136 6.3 Gaps 137 6.4 Recommendations 141 Bibliography 144 Appendix I: Research Plan 149 Appendix II: Focus Group Results 155 Appendix III: Questionnaire 158 Appendix IV: List of Interviews 172 Appendix V: About the Authors 175 VI Tables and Figures Tables 1 Leisure Time of Serbian Youth 25 2 Percentage of Young People Who Have Traveled Outside of Serbia 32 3 Party Membership (by %) 41 4 Definitions of “Youth” 54 5 Principles Underlying National Youth Strategy 63 6 Objectives of the National Youth Strategy 64 7 Classification of Youth by Age 65 8 Classification by Vulnerability 66 9 Principles of Youth Policy as Specified by Law on Youth 68 10 Institutions Responsible for Youth Employment Policy 86 11 Employment Action Plan Objectives 89 12 Macroeconomic and Sectoral Employment Policies 92 13 A Look at Serbia’s “First Chance” Program 96 14 Questionnaire Results on Formal Education 110 Figures 1 GDP Per Capita 1989–1999 20 2 Unemployment rates by age groups 2005–2010 29 3 Science TIMSS Grade 8 Scores 108 4 Math TIMSS Grade 8 Score 108 VII List of Acronyms CeSID Center for Free Elections and Democracy EU European Union FRY Federal Republic of Yugoslavia GDP Gross Domestic Product ICTY International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia IDP Internally Displaced Person ILO International Labor Organization IOM International Organization for Migration KOMS Umbrella Organization for the Youth of Serbia LGBTI Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transsexual, Intergender MERD Ministry of Economy and Regional Development MoYS Ministry of Youth and Sport OECD Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development OSCE Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe RSD Republic of Serbia Dinars SRS Serbian Radical Party STD Sexually Transmitted Disease UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund USAID United States Agency for International Development YCS Youth Coalition of Serbia Executive Summary n recent years, Serbia has made significant strides in developing policies that are cognizant of and responsive to the concerns of Serbia’s youth. The adoption in 2011 of a national Law on Youth represents a significant step forward in the realization of young people’s rights. But, while Ser- Ibia’s youth has made demonstrable headway in the policy domain, young people continue to face significant obstacles on the road from childhood to adulthood. This review sheds light on the opportunities and challenges confronting young people in Serbia, as well as how Serbia’s youth might successfully advocate for policies and reforms that overcome such obsta- cles. Young people between the ages of 15 and 31 make up about 20 percent of the population in Serbia. Confronted by a graying population and the hardships of a post-communist, post-conflict transition, these young peo- ple faced enormous obstacles over the course of the past decade. On the economic front, while Serbia has experienced steady gains in GDP since the democratic changes of 2000, Serbia’s young people continue to suffer from high rates of unemployment, a lack of access to the labor market, and vul- nerability to macroeconomic instability. On the political front, while Ser- bia has successfully made the transition to an electoral democratic state, young people continue to be far removed from decision-making processes and are often denied a voice in the decisions that affect their lives. To remedy this, in 2007 Serbia launched a multifaceted, participatory strategy to develop a national youth policy. In that year, it established the Ministry of Youth and Sport (MoYS) and charged it with overseeing that policy. In 2008, in consultation with youth policy experts, civil society or- ganizations, intersectoral ministries, and thousands of young people them- selves, the MoYS drafted Serbia’s first National Youth Strategy. The follow- 2 · YOUTH AND PUBLIC POLICY IN SERBIA ing year it adopted an Action Plan that delineated the tools and activities through which to realize the ambitions laid out in the Strategy. In 2011, for the very first time, Serbia’s parliament adopted a national Law on Youth—to go into effect in 2012. The passage of the Law on Youth and the creation of a coherent national strategy are important steps in empowering Serbia’s young people. The pol- icy that has thus far developed may be applauded for the following reasons: » A Participatory Process: The process that led to the development of the National Youth Strategy, Action Plan, and Law on Youth was broadly in- clusive and engaged experts, civil society organizations, youth groups, and young people themselves from all across Serbia. » Recognition of Civil Society: Civil society formed an important partner throughout the development of Serbia’s Youth Strategy, and it has been reflected in the Law on Youth.
Recommended publications
  • Overview of TACSO Achievements Compiled by Jasenka Perović
    Overview of TACSO achievements Compiled by Jasenka Perović www.tacso.org The European Union (EU) funded project Technical July 2013 Assistance for Civil Society Organisations (TACSO) has for four years (2009-2013) worked on the main objective to strengthen the overall capacities and accountability of Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) within the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance This project is funded by the European Union (IPA) beneficiaries and to guarantee the quality of services of CSOs and a sustainable role of CSOs in the democratic process. OVERVIEW OF TACSO ACHIEVEMENT Compiled by Jasenka Perović July 2013 LIST OF ABBREVIOTIONS ABA The Albanian Blind Association AEC Assemblée Européenne des Citoyens AL Albania ASB Arbeiter-Samariter-Bund Deutschland eV ASE Albania Social Enterprises Forum BCSDN Balkan Civil Society Development Network BeWMAN Balkan e-Waste Management Network BiH Bosnia and Herzegovina BIOM Association for Biological Research BON Balkan Organic Network BRESN Balkan Regional Early Support Network CARDS Community Assistance for reconstruction, Development and Stabilisation CBC Cross Border Programme CCSD Council for Civil Society Development CEID Association for Monitoring Gender Quality CELOR Centre for Local development CfPs Calls for Proposals CHP Republican people’s Party CISS Metamorphosis and Citizens of Macedonia CONCORD European NGO Confederation for Relief and Development CPE Commissioner for Protection of Equality CRDP Centre for Research, Documentation and Publication CSDev Civil Society Development
    [Show full text]
  • Serbia and Montenegro
    ATTACKS ON JUSTICE – SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO Highlights Serbia and Montenegro (the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia until February 2003) entered the process of democratic transition, the creation of a system based on the rule of law, much later than other former socialist countries. On 4 February 2003 the new state union of Serbia and Montenegro was proclaimed. Under the Constitutional Charter of the State Union of Serbia and Montenegro, there is only one instance of Serbia and Montenegro having a common judiciary – the Court of Serbia and Montenegro. Otherwise, each state – the Republic of Serbia and the Republic of Montenegro – has its own internal courts system. A set of important judicial reforms came into force on 1 March 2002 in the Republic of Serbia and in July 2002 amendments to these laws were made that violate the principle of separation of powers and the independence and impartiality of the judiciary. In Montenegro, several laws relating to the judiciary were passed or amended during 2003. On 19 March 2003, the National Assembly of the Republic of Serbia dismissed 35 judges from office, including seven Supreme Court judges, amid accusations that the judiciary had failed to take tougher measures in dealing with remnants of the former regime as well as in prosecuting organized crime. The legal system in Serbia and Montenegro is still characterized by a number of contradictory and inconsistent regulations, resulting in legal insecurity. BACKGROUND On March 2002 officials of the Republic of Serbia and the Republic of Montenegro signed a procedural agreement for the restructuring of relations between both states in Belgrade, in the presence of the high representative of the EU,.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shaping of Bulgarian and Serbian National Identities, 1800S-1900S
    The Shaping of Bulgarian and Serbian National Identities, 1800s-1900s February 2003 Katrin Bozeva-Abazi Department of History McGill University, Montreal A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 1 Contents 1. Abstract/Resume 3 2. Note on Transliteration and Spelling of Names 6 3. Acknowledgments 7 4. Introduction 8 How "popular" nationalism was created 5. Chapter One 33 Peasants and intellectuals, 1830-1914 6. Chapter Two 78 The invention of the modern Balkan state: Serbia and Bulgaria, 1830-1914 7. Chapter Three 126 The Church and national indoctrination 8. Chapter Four 171 The national army 8. Chapter Five 219 Education and national indoctrination 9. Conclusions 264 10. Bibliography 273 Abstract The nation-state is now the dominant form of sovereign statehood, however, a century and a half ago the political map of Europe comprised only a handful of sovereign states, very few of them nations in the modern sense. Balkan historiography often tends to minimize the complexity of nation-building, either by referring to the national community as to a monolithic and homogenous unit, or simply by neglecting different social groups whose consciousness varied depending on region, gender and generation. Further, Bulgarian and Serbian historiography pay far more attention to the problem of "how" and "why" certain events have happened than to the emergence of national consciousness of the Balkan peoples as a complex and durable process of mental evolution. This dissertation on the concept of nationality in which most Bulgarians and Serbs were educated and socialized examines how the modern idea of nationhood was disseminated among the ordinary people and it presents the complicated process of national indoctrination carried out by various state institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Democratic Security Sector Governance in Serbia
    PRIF-Reports No. 94 Democratic Security Sector Governance in Serbia Filip Ejdus This report was prepared with the kind support of the Volkswagen-Stiftung. Peace Research Institute Frankfurt (PRIF) 2010 Correspondence to: PRIF Baseler Straße 27-31 60329 Frankfurt am Main Germany Telephone: +49(0)69 95 91 04-0 Fax: +49(0)69 55 84 81 E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: www.prif.org ISBN: 978-3-942532-04-4 Euro 10.- Summary On 5 October 2000, the citizens of Serbia toppled Slobodan Milošević in what came to be known as the “Bulldozer Revolution”. This watershed event symbolizes not only the end of a decade of authoritarian rule but also the beginning of a double transition: from authoritarian rule to democracy, on the one hand, and from a series of armed conflicts to peace, on the other. This transition has thoroughly transformed Serbian politics in general and Serbia’s security sector in particular. This October, Serbia’s democracy celebrated its tenth anniversary. The jubilee is an appropriate opportunity to reflect on the past decade. With this aim in mind, the report will seek to analyse the impact of democratization on security sector governance in Serbia over the period 2000-2010. In order to do so, in the first part of the report we have developed an analytical framework for studying democratic security sector governance, which is defined as the transparent organization and management of the security sector based on the accountability of decision-makers, respect for the rule of law and human rights, checks and balances, equal representation, active civic participation, public agreement and democratic oversight.
    [Show full text]
  • Serbia 2029 Prospectus
    REPUBLIC OF SERBIA (represented by the Government of the Republic of Serbia, acting by and through the Ministry of Finance) €1,000,000,000 1.500 per cent. Notes due 2029 Issue price: 98.909 per cent. The €1,000,000,000 1.500 per cent. Notes due 2029 (the “Notes”) to be issued by the Republic of Serbia, represented by the Government of the Republic of Serbia acting by and through the Ministry of Finance (the “Issuer”) will mature on 26 June 2029 and, unless previously purchased and cancelled, will be redeemed at their principal amount on that date. The Notes will bear interest at a rate of 1.500 per cent. per annum. Interest will accrue on the outstanding principal amount of the Notes from and including 26 June 2019 and will be payable annually in arrear on 26 June in each year, commencing on 26 June 2020. All payments of principal and interest in respect of the Notes shall be made free and clear of, and without withholding or deduction for, any taxes, duties, assessments or governmental charges of whatever nature imposed, levied, collected, withheld or assessed by or within the Republic of Serbia (the “Republic of Serbia” or “Serbia”) or any political subdivision or any authority thereof or therein having power to tax, unless such withholding or deduction is required by law. In that event, the Issuer shall pay such additional amounts as will result in the receipt by the Noteholders of such amounts as would have been received by them if no such withholding or deduction had been required, subject to certain exceptions set out in the Conditions (as defined below).
    [Show full text]
  • Serbia Guidebook 2013
    SERBIA PREFACE A visit to Serbia places one in the center of the Balkans, the 20th century's tinderbox of Europe, where two wars were fought as prelude to World War I and where the last decade of the century witnessed Europe's bloodiest conflict since World War II. Serbia chose democracy in the waning days before the 21st century formally dawned and is steadily transforming an open, democratic, free-market society. Serbia offers a countryside that is beautiful and diverse. The country's infrastructure, though over-burdened, is European. The general reaction of the local population is genuinely one of welcome. The local population is warm and focused on the future; assuming their rightful place in Europe. AREA, GEOGRAPHY, AND CLIMATE Serbia is located in the central part of the Balkan Peninsula and occupies 77,474square kilometers, an area slightly smaller than South Carolina. It borders Montenegro, Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina to the west, Hungary to the north, Romania and Bulgaria to the east, and Albania, Macedonia, and Kosovo to the south. Serbia's many waterway, road, rail, and telecommunications networks link Europe with Asia at a strategic intersection in southeastern Europe. Endowed with natural beauty, Serbia is rich in varied topography and climate. Three navigable rivers pass through Serbia: the Danube, Sava, and Tisa. The longest is the Danube, which flows for 588 of its 2,857-kilometer course through Serbia and meanders around the capital, Belgrade, on its way to Romania and the Black Sea. The fertile flatlands of the Panonian Plain distinguish Serbia's northern countryside, while the east flaunts dramatic limestone ranges and basins.
    [Show full text]
  • Corruption in Serbia: [email protected]
    U4 Helpdesk Answer U4 Helpdesk Answer 2020 17 April 2020 AUTHOR Overview of corruption and Nieves Zúñiga (TI) anti-corruption in Serbia: [email protected] Changes in the last 10 years REVIEWED BY Guillaume Nicaise (U4) The evolution of corruption and anti-corruption in Serbia has [email protected] followed the transition from a fragile government led by the Democratic Party to an increasingly centralised and authoritarian Transparency Serbia regime led by the Serbian Progressive Party. Even if there is no [email protected] evidence of a significant change in the level of corruption, corruption in the Balkan country shapes political dynamics, resulting in the capture of political decision making and the political control of independent institutions, the judiciary and the legislature. The progress made in anti-corruption has been more RELATED U4 MATERIAL on paper than in practice, with the implementation of those Western Balkans and Turkey: reforms being the main challenge. Overview of Corruption and Anti- Corruption Corruption and doing business in Serbia Helpdesk Answers are tailor-made research briefings compiled in ten working days. The U4 Helpdesk is a free research service run in collaboration with Transparency International. Query How has corruption evolved in the past 10 years in Serbia? To what extent is corruption connected to political dynamics and social norms? Give an overview of anti-corruption initiatives in Serbia. Contents MAIN POINTS — In the last ten years there has not been a 1. Introduction significant change in the level of corruption 2. Evolution of corruption in the last 10 years in Serbia. a. Extent of corruption b.
    [Show full text]
  • Wage Dynamics in Croatia: Leaders and Followers
    ISSN 2443-8030 (online) Wage dynamics in Croatia: leaders and followers Kristian Orsini, Vukašin Ostojić ECONOMIC BRIEF 003 | OCTOBER 2015 EUROPEAN ECONOMY Economic and EUROPEAN Financial Affairs ECONOMY European Economy Economic Briefs are written by the staff of the European Commission’s Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs to inform discussion on economic policy and to stimulate debate. The views expressed in this document are solely those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official views of the European Commission. Authorised for publication by Servaas Deroose, Deputy Director-General for Economic and Financial Affairs. LEGAL NOTICE Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on its behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained in this publication, or for any errors which, despite careful preparation and checking, may appear. This paper exists in English only and can be downloaded from http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/. Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you). More information on the European Union is available on http://europa.eu. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2015 KC-BE-15-003-EN-N (online) KC-BE-15-003-EN-C (print) ISBN 978-92-79-48742-2 (online) ISBN 978-92-79-48741-5 (print) doi:10.2765/968722 (online) doi:10.2765/28127 (print) © European Union, 2015 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • FOSTERING TOURISM COMPETITIVENESS in SOUTH EAST EUROPE Fostering Tourism
    Policy Handbook POLICY HANDBOOK POLICY FOSTERING TOURISM COMPETITIVENESS IN SOUTH EAST EUROPE Fostering Tourism . In recent years, the South East Europe (SEE) region has seen a growing number IN SOUTH EAST EUROPE COMPETITIVENESS TOURISM FOSTERING Competitiveness in of international tourist arrivals. Despite this rising influx of visitors, the region’s full tourism potential remains untapped due to multiple factors hampering the sector’s competitiveness. These include a lack of relevant workforce skills, a South East Europe mismatch between the region’s tourism offer and an increasingly niche market demand, uncompetitive price levels, limited protection of natural and cultural heritage, transport and travel infrastructure gaps, and the need for more strategic and focused policy approaches to tourism. What challenges are SEE policy makers encountering in their efforts to foster tourism competitiveness? What good practices in promoting tourism could be relevant to the region? What policy options could SEE economies consider for the future? This Policy Handbook focuses on these issues and presents a number of policy options to foster tourism competitiveness in South East Europe. This Policy Handbook is one of the results of the OECD Sector Competitiveness Project undertaken in collaboration with the SEE Tourism Expert Group (TEG) under the umbrella of the Next Generation Competitiveness Initiative in co-operation with the Regional Cooperation Council. The TEG is composed of representatives from the ministries of economy, tourism, trade and environment, as well as government agencies, chambers of commerce, private-sector associations and private-sector companies in South East Europe. Co-funded by the European Union GLOBAL RELATIONS South East Europe Tourism [PH] cover [final 2].indd 1 15/02/2016 17:03 ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT The OECD is a unique forum where governments work together to address the economic, social and environmental challenges of globalisation.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Whose Is This Song?' Nationalism and Identity Through the Lens of Adela Peeva
    Cinema Eleni Elefterias-Kostakidis University of Sydney 'Whose Is This Song?' Nationalism and Identity through the lens of Adela Peeva I. Through the lens: a search for truth “The unexamined life is not worth living" Socrates Whose is this Song is a palimpsest of overlapping cultural layers that explore the imagined cultural and ethnic stereotypes of the Balkan community through this well-known shared tune. It is a documentary film about this hybrid folk tune that is common throughout the Balkan region, but which is the cause of much dissension and the incitement for the events portrayed in the film. Many have commented on, or tried to trace the archetype of, the song ‘On the road to Uskiindar’ (Turkish version) or Alto £evo TOJCO / From a foreign land (Greek version). Adela Peeva is on a quest for the truth. As she says in the film, she is on a quest for “the discovery and communication of truth.”1 Though an interesting topic in itself, this paper is more concerned with the “documentary voice”2 created by the director through the scenery and the subjects she chooses to interview. How she uses her camera lens, and its synchronous focus on the background, or backdrop, not only adds to the mystery of the film, but more importantly to the greater issue of cultural similarity and perceived diversity: nationalism and identity within the Balkans. 21 Adela Peeva is a Bulgarian Documentary Filmmaker3 who has been involved in the making of over 30 European and International documentary films. Her documentary, Whose is this Song? is considered an international work as it was part of a project developed within the “European Documentary Network including workshops in Thessaloniki, Greece and Dubrovnik, Croatia and funded by various European Sponsors”.4 It stresses the importance of the context of this documentary about a region that shares a cultural and historical past.
    [Show full text]
  • S/PV.8100 Kosovo 14/11/2017
    United Nations S/ PV.8100 Security Council Provisional Seventy-second year 8100th meeting Tuesday, 14 November 2017, 11.15 a.m. New York President: Mr. Cardi/Mr. Lambertini ......................... (Italy) Members: Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ..................... Mr. Llorentty Solíz China ......................................... Mr. Zhang Dianbin Egypt ......................................... Mr. Moustafa Ethiopia ....................................... Mr. Alemu France ........................................ Mrs. Gueguen Japan ......................................... Mr. Kawamura Kazakhstan .................................... Mr. Tumysh Russian Federation ............................... Mr. Nebenzia Senegal ....................................... Mr. Ciss Sweden ....................................... Mr. Skoog Ukraine ....................................... Mr. Fesko United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland .. Mr. Clay United States of America .......................... Ms. Sison Uruguay ....................................... Mr. Bermúdez Agenda Security Council resolutions 1160 (1998), 1199 (1998), 1203 (1998), 1239 (1999) and 1244 (1999) Report of the Secretary-General on the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo (S/2017/911) This record contains the text of speeches delivered in English and of the translation of speeches delivered in other languages. The final text will be printed in the Official Records of the Security Council. Corrections should be submitted to the original languages only.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights in Serbia 2019
    HUMAN RIGHTS IN SERBIA 2019 Belgrade Centre for Human Rights The Belgrade Centre for Human Rights was established by a group of human rights experts and activists in February 1995 as a non-profit, non- governmental organisation. The main purpose of the Centre is to study human rights, to disseminate knowledge about them and to educate individuals engaged in this area. It hopes, thereby, to promote the development of democracy and rule of law in Serbia. Since 1998 Belgrade Centre for Human Right has been publishing Annual Human Rights Report. This Report on Human Rights in Serbia analyses the Constitution and laws of the Republic of Serbia with respect to the civil and poli- tical rights guaranteed by international treaties binding on Serbia, in particular the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), the European Convention on Human Rights and Funda- mental Freedoms (ECHR) and its Proto- cols and standards established by the jurisprudence of the UN Human Rights Committee and the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). Where relevant, the Report also re- views Serbia’s legislation with respect to standards established by specific inter- national treaties dealing with specific human rights, such as the UN Convention against Torture, the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, the UN Convention on the Elimina- tion of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) and the UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination. For its achievements in the area of human rights, the Centre was awarded the Bruno Kreisky Prize for 2000.
    [Show full text]