DOCSLIB.ORG

S/PV.8100 Kosovo 14/11/2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
S/PV.8100 Kosovo 14/11/2017 United Nations S/ PV.8100 Security Council Provisional Seventy-second year 8100th meeting Tuesday, 14 November 2017, 11.15 a.m. New York President: Mr. Cardi/Mr. Lambertini ......................... (Italy) Members: Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ..................... Mr. Llorentty Solíz China ......................................... Mr. Zhang Dianbin Egypt ......................................... Mr. Moustafa Ethiopia ....................................... Mr. Alemu France ........................................ Mrs. Gueguen Japan ......................................... Mr. Kawamura Kazakhstan .................................... Mr. Tumysh Russian Federation ............................... Mr. Nebenzia Senegal ....................................... Mr. Ciss Sweden ....................................... Mr. Skoog Ukraine ....................................... Mr. Fesko United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland .. Mr. Clay United States of America .......................... Ms. Sison Uruguay ....................................... Mr. Bermúdez Agenda Security Council resolutions 1160 (1998), 1199 (1998), 1203 (1998), 1239 (1999) and 1244 (1999) Report of the Secretary-General on the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo (S/2017/911) This record contains the text of speeches delivered in English and of the translation of speeches delivered in other languages. The final text will be printed in the Official Records of the Security Council. Corrections should be submitted to the original languages only. They should be incorporated in a copy of the record and sent under the signature of a member of the delegation concerned to the Chief of the Verbatim Reporting Service, room U-0506 ([email protected]). Corrected records will be reissued electronically on the Official Document System of the United Nations (http://documents.un.org). 17-38015 (E) *1738015* S/PV.8100 Kosovo 14/11/2017 The meeting was called to order at 11.15 a.m. Belgrade and Pristina. It was therefore the second time that the four Kosovo Serb-majority municipalities in Adoption of the agenda northern Kosovo had participated in such elections. Those elections saw a strong turnout, particularly in the The agenda was adopted. Serb-majority areas throughout Kosovo. They provided the population of Kosovo the opportunity to select their Security Council resolutions 1160 (1998), 1199 most immediate leaders and thus to express their views (1998), 1203 (1998), 1239 (1999) and 1244 (1999) on their political priorities, as well as the performance Report of the Secretary-General on the and the delivery of the major competing parties. More United Nations Interim Administration Mission than 7,000 candidates competed across Kosovo. in Kosovo (S/2017/911) A significant increase in Serb participation occurred The President: In accordance with rule 37 of the in the Serb-majority municipalities. The average Council’s provisional rules of procedure, I invite the turnout in those municipalities was 43.4 per cent, which representative of Serbia to participate in this meeting. can be compared with around 38 per cent in 2013. In the four northern municipalities, the difference was even On behalf of the Council, I welcome His Excellency more pronounced: a turnout of 44 per cent compared Mr. Ivica Dačić, First Deputy Prime Minister and with 24 per cent turnout in 2013. The European Union Minister for Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Serbia. (EU) deployed some 100 observers across Kosovo on In accordance with rule 39 of the Council’s election day while the Organization for Security and provisional rules of procedure, I invite Mr. Zahir Tanin, Co-operation in Europe facilitated the voting in the Special Representative of the Secretary-General and northern municipalities. Both organizations praised the Head of the United Nations Interim Administration generally peaceful and orderly conduct of the elections. Mission in Kosovo, to participate in this meeting. However, the EU observers also stressed that, in the Kosovo Serb-majority municipalities, the campaign In accordance with rule 39 of the Council’s was affected by restricted competition and intimidation. provisional rules of procedure, I also invite Ms. Vlora Çitaku to participate in this meeting. As I reported in August (see S/PV.8025), the multiple election processes this year in Kosovo The Security Council will now begin its consideration produced a period in which few decisions could be of the item on its agenda. undertaken with the necessary authority in Pristina. I wish to draw the attention of Council members With the runoffs for mayoral elections scheduled for to document S/2017/911, the report of the Secretary- 19 November and the electoral process now nearing General on the United Nations Interim Administration completion, I am hopeful that this will soon change. Mission in Kosovo. Some signs warrant cautious optimism. On 31 October, the new Assembly of Kosovo, passed a second reading I now give the floor to Mr. Tanin. of the Kosovo budget, despite the narrow majority Mr. Tanin: At the outset, I would like to congratulate held by the Government. The Serb caucus and the you, Mr. President, and Italy on your assumption of the cabinet of the Prime Minister collaborated to achieve presidency of the Council for this month. I am happy to that result. Meanwhile, we see signs of movement on join this meeting today. other particularly important social and economic issues that have repeatedly been delayed during the lengthy The most recent reporting period is well covered in elections period. the Secretary-General’s report (S/2017/911) that we are This leaves the question of what lies ahead. During reviewing today. In addition, I will brief the Council on the past three months, I have had the opportunity to share recent significant developments that have taken place views on the situation with a variety of interlocutors, in since the end of the reporting period. Pristina, in Belgrade and more widely. I would like to On 19 October, municipal elections were conducted underline the fact that all sides generally share the view throughout Kosovo — the second Kosovo-wide local that the state of affairs between Belgrade and Pristina elections since the agreement of 19 April 2013 on the has the potential to evolve beyond the unfortunate long- principles of the normalization of relations between standing impasse. 2/22 17-38015 14/11/2017 Kosovo S/PV.8100 On 24 October, 40 new judges and 13 new State Signs of political will and commitment to move prosecutors from the Serb community were sworn forward seem increasingly evident. Populations are into office in Kosovo — a significant step in the understandably frustrated by the lack of opportunities implementation of the first EU-facilitated agreement. brought on by unresolved political mistrust and These judicial officials will work as part of a unitary tensions. With the end of the election cycle, the time Kosovo justice system, and staffing and logistical for action now moves ahead of the time for excuses. arrangements are also under way, with support from all In many practical areas, political bickering and the the international presences in Kosovo, including from failure to fully implement technical agreements place the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in unacceptable burdens on the population. As one Kosovo (UNMIK). The parties are to be commended example, excessive administrative obstacles continue for moving this forward. The judicial area had lagged to discourage travel and commerce, despite agreements notably behind other implementation achievements, which purported to alleviate such impediments. such as police integration and implementation of technical steps in the telecommunications and Allow me to offer another example, which has utilities spheres. arisen during the past few days. In accordance with its mandate, UNMIK has continued to do everything within However, it is equally important to note that overall, its authorized powers to support the implementation of the implementation of agreements achieved in 2013, the Central European Free Trade Agreement (CEFTA), and even earlier, continue, at best, to be sporadic and which UNMIK signed on behalf of Kosovo in 2006. In variable. Within the framework of the EU-facilitated practice, Pristina representatives working on CEFTA dialogue, technical implementation needs more issues attend all CEFTA meetings. UNMIK’s basic meaningful commitment from both sides. The most participation has always been in accordance with legal obvious gap continues to be the lack of progress statutes. Despite these facts, some actors have recently towards the implementation of the agreed association/ sought to repoliticize, through public rhetoric, those community of Serb-majority municipalities. otherwise highly practical, functional and beneficial Considerable headway has already been made, arrangements. Permit me, in this forum, to be very and the EU-facilitated dialogue in Brussels remains clear. UNMIK participation continues strictly to crucial as a core element in a wider process. Alongside the extent required by CEFTA members to ensure that endeavour, the European Union’s Berlin process, its functionality, which in turn supports economic addressing the future enlargement potential of the opportunity throughout the region. UNMIK will European Union, has also progressed. Having begun at equally support any agreement reached by CEFTA a 2014 Western Balkans summit, it has been followed Members which would
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kosovo: Background and U.S
    Kosovo: Background and U.S. Policy Updated March 11, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46175 SUMMARY R46175 Kosovo: Background and U.S. Policy March 11, 2021 Kosovo, a country in the Western Balkans with a predominantly Albanian-speaking population, declared independence from Serbia in 2008, less than a decade after a brief but lethal war. It has Sarah E. Garding since been recognized by about 100 countries. The United States and most European Union (EU) Analyst in European Affairs member states recognize Kosovo. Serbia, Russia, China, and various other countries (including five EU member states) do not. Key issues for Kosovo include the following: New Leadership. Albin Kurti is poised to become prime minister for the second time after his left-leaning Self-Determination Party (Vetëvendosje) won a landslide victory in early parliamentary elections in February 2021. The poll was Kosovo’s second snap parliamentary election in less than two years. Once of the new parliament’s initial responsibilities is to elect the country’s next president. Acting President Vjosa Osmani, whose candidacy is backed by Vetëvendosje, is heavily favored to win. Parliament’s failure to elect a president could trigger early parliamentary elections, however. Dialogue with Serbia. The unresolved dispute between Kosovo and Serbia is one of the main threats to regional stability in the Western Balkans. Since 2011, the EU has facilitated a dialogue aimed at normalizing their relations. In July 2020, Kosovo and Serbia returned to EU-led talks after a 20-month suspension. Shortly thereafter, the two parties agreed to new measures on economic cooperation at talks hosted by the White House.
    [Show full text]
  • Serbia and Montenegro
    ATTACKS ON JUSTICE – SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO Highlights Serbia and Montenegro (the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia until February 2003) entered the process of democratic transition, the creation of a system based on the rule of law, much later than other former socialist countries. On 4 February 2003 the new state union of Serbia and Montenegro was proclaimed. Under the Constitutional Charter of the State Union of Serbia and Montenegro, there is only one instance of Serbia and Montenegro having a common judiciary – the Court of Serbia and Montenegro. Otherwise, each state – the Republic of Serbia and the Republic of Montenegro – has its own internal courts system. A set of important judicial reforms came into force on 1 March 2002 in the Republic of Serbia and in July 2002 amendments to these laws were made that violate the principle of separation of powers and the independence and impartiality of the judiciary. In Montenegro, several laws relating to the judiciary were passed or amended during 2003. On 19 March 2003, the National Assembly of the Republic of Serbia dismissed 35 judges from office, including seven Supreme Court judges, amid accusations that the judiciary had failed to take tougher measures in dealing with remnants of the former regime as well as in prosecuting organized crime. The legal system in Serbia and Montenegro is still characterized by a number of contradictory and inconsistent regulations, resulting in legal insecurity. BACKGROUND On March 2002 officials of the Republic of Serbia and the Republic of Montenegro signed a procedural agreement for the restructuring of relations between both states in Belgrade, in the presence of the high representative of the EU,.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Nationalism on Territorial Integrity Among Armenians and Serbs Nina Patelic
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2008 The Effects of Nationalism on Territorial Integrity Among Armenians and Serbs Nina Patelic Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES THE EFFECTS OF NATIONALISM ON TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY AMONG ARMENIANS AND SERBS By Nina Patelic A Thesis submitted to the Department of International Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Degree Awarded: Spring Semester, 2008 The members of the Committee approve the thesis of Nina Pantelic, defended on September 28th, 2007. ------------------------------- Jonathan Grant Professor Directing Thesis ------------------------------- Peter Garretson Committee Member ------------------------------- Mark Souva Committee Member The Office of Graduate Studies has verified and approved the above named committee members. ii ACKOWLEDGEMENTS This paper could not have been written without the academic insight of my thesis committee members, as well as Dr. Kotchikian. I would also like to thank my parents Dr. Svetlana Adamovic and Dr. Predrag Pantelic, my grandfather Dr. Ljubisa Adamovic, my sister Ana Pantelic, and my best friend, Jason Wiggins, who have all supported me over the years. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………..v INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………….1 1. NATIONALISM, AND HOW IT DEVELOPED IN SERBIA AND ARMENIA...6 2. THE CONFLICT OVER KOSOVO AND METOHIJA…………………………...27 3. THE CONFLICT OVER NAGORNO KARABAKH……………………………..56 CONCLUSION………………………………………………………………...……….89 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY…………………………………………………………93 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH………………………………………………………….101 iv ABSTRACT Nationalism has been a driving force in both nation building and in spurring high levels of violence. As nations have become the norm in modern day society, nationalism has become detrimental to international law, which protects the powers of sovereignty.
    [Show full text]
  • WP1.1 Report on WB Regional Issues Related to WRM
    REPORT ON WB REGIONAL ISSUES RELATED TO WRM This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. WP1.1 Report on WB regional issues related to WRM PROJECT INFO Project title Strengthening of master curricula in water resources management for the Western Balkans HEIs and stakeholders Project acronym SWARM Project reference number 597888-EPP-1-2018-1-RS-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP Funding scheme Erasmus+ Capacity building in the field of higher education Web address www.swarm.ni.ac.rs Coordination institution University of Nis Project duration 15 November 2018 – 14 November 2021 DOCUMENT CONTROL SHEET Work package WP1 Analysis of water resources management in the Western Balkan region Ref. no and title of activity WP1.1 Identification of WB regional issues related to WRM Title of deliverable Report on WB regional issues related to WRM Lead institution University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna Author(s) Kurt Glock, Michael Tritthart Document status Final Document version and date V01 14.03.2019 Dissemination level National, Regional, International VERSIONING AND CONTRIBUTION HISTORY Version Date Revision description Partner responsible v.01 14.03.2019 Document created BOKU 1 WP1.1 Report on WB regional issues related to WRM Contents 1 Introduction.........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kosovo Political Economy Analysis Final Report
    KOSOVO POLITICAL ECONOMY ANALYSIS FINAL REPORT DECEMBER 26, 2017 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Management Systems International, A Tetra Tech Company. KOSOVO POLITICAL ECONOMY ANALYSIS FINAL REPORT December 26, 2017 IDIQ No. AID-167-I-17-00002 Award No: AID-167-TO-17-00009 Prepared by Management Systems International (MSI), A Tetra Tech Company 200 12th St South, Suite 1200 Arlington, VA, USA 22202 DISCLAIMER This report is made possible by the support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the sole responsibility of the Management Systems International and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. CONTENTS Acronyms ...................................................................................................................................... ii Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... iii I. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 6 II. Methodology ............................................................................................................................. 7 A. Foundational Factors ........................................................................................................................................... 7 B. Rules
    [Show full text]
  • Democratic Security Sector Governance in Serbia
    PRIF-Reports No. 94 Democratic Security Sector Governance in Serbia Filip Ejdus This report was prepared with the kind support of the Volkswagen-Stiftung. Peace Research Institute Frankfurt (PRIF) 2010 Correspondence to: PRIF Baseler Straße 27-31 60329 Frankfurt am Main Germany Telephone: +49(0)69 95 91 04-0 Fax: +49(0)69 55 84 81 E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: www.prif.org ISBN: 978-3-942532-04-4 Euro 10.- Summary On 5 October 2000, the citizens of Serbia toppled Slobodan Milošević in what came to be known as the “Bulldozer Revolution”. This watershed event symbolizes not only the end of a decade of authoritarian rule but also the beginning of a double transition: from authoritarian rule to democracy, on the one hand, and from a series of armed conflicts to peace, on the other. This transition has thoroughly transformed Serbian politics in general and Serbia’s security sector in particular. This October, Serbia’s democracy celebrated its tenth anniversary. The jubilee is an appropriate opportunity to reflect on the past decade. With this aim in mind, the report will seek to analyse the impact of democratization on security sector governance in Serbia over the period 2000-2010. In order to do so, in the first part of the report we have developed an analytical framework for studying democratic security sector governance, which is defined as the transparent organization and management of the security sector based on the accountability of decision-makers, respect for the rule of law and human rights, checks and balances, equal representation, active civic participation, public agreement and democratic oversight.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapport De Mission En République Du Kosovo
    Rapport de mission en République du Kosovo du 10 au 20 juin 2015 Mission organisée par l’Office français de protection des réfugiés et apatrides (OFPRA) avec la participation de la Cour nationale du droit d’asile (CNDA) et du Bundesamt Für migration und Flüchtlinge (BAMF) PUBLICATION 2015 Rapport de mission en République du Kosovo du 10 au 20 juin 2015 Mission organisée par l’Office français de protection des réfugiés et apatrides (OFPRA) avec la participation de la Cour nationale du droit d’asile (CNDA) et du Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge (BAMF) Projet cofinancé par le Fonds Asile Migration et Intégration (FAMI) Rapport de mission au Kosovo - juin 2015 Rapport de mission au Kosovo - juin 2015 Interlocuteurs rencontrés au cours de la mission Elaboration du rapport Organisations internationales Ce rapport a été élaboré par l’équipe de la mission : Elodie GUEGO (chef de mission, division Europe-Maria Casarès, OFPRA), Mélina PELE (officier de protection instructeur, division Asie- Haut-commissariat des Nations-Unies pour les Réfugiés (UNHCR) Atiq Rahimi, OFPRA), Patrick VOISIN (chargé de recherches, division de l’information, de la – Narashima RAO, chef de mission documentation et des recherches-DIDR, OFPRA), Raphaël NICOLLE (chargé d’études et de recherches au centre de recherches et documentation-CEREDOC, CNDA), Mario SCHLINDWEIN Organisation pour la Sécurité et la Coopération en Europe (OSCE) (officier de liaison allemand de l’office fédéral pour la migration et les réfugiés-BAMF à la – Raph J. BUNCHE, chef de la section loi et justice Direction Générale des Etrangers en France-DGEF). La mise en page a été effectuée par – Senad ŠABOVIC, chef du bureau des affaires politiques et de la communication Eric CHIARAPPA (documentaliste, division de l’information, de la documentation et des – Sahedin SHOK, officier de la section des Droits des communautés recherches-DIDR).
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution of the Republic of Kosovo - I - CONSTITUTION of the REPUBLIC of KOSOVO CHAPTER I BASIC PROVISIONS
    Constitution of the Republic of Kosovo - i - CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF KOSOVO CHAPTER I BASIC PROVISIONS.......................................................................................................................1 ARTICLE 1 [D EFINITION OF STATE ]...........................................................................................................................1 ARTICLE 2 [S OVEREIGNTY ] .......................................................................................................................................1 ARTICLE 3 [E QUALITY BEFORE THE LAW ].................................................................................................................1 ARTICLE 4 [F ORM OF GOVERNMENT AND SEPARATION OF POWER ] .........................................................................1 ARTICLE 5 [L ANGUAGES ]..........................................................................................................................................2 ARTICLE 6 [S YMBOLS ] ..............................................................................................................................................2 ARTICLE 7 [V ALUES ].................................................................................................................................................2 ARTICLE 8 [S ECULAR STATE ]....................................................................................................................................2 ARTICLE 9 [C ULTURAL AND RELIGIOUS HERITAGE ] .................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Corruption in Serbia: [email protected]
    U4 Helpdesk Answer U4 Helpdesk Answer 2020 17 April 2020 AUTHOR Overview of corruption and Nieves Zúñiga (TI) anti-corruption in Serbia: [email protected] Changes in the last 10 years REVIEWED BY Guillaume Nicaise (U4) The evolution of corruption and anti-corruption in Serbia has [email protected] followed the transition from a fragile government led by the Democratic Party to an increasingly centralised and authoritarian Transparency Serbia regime led by the Serbian Progressive Party. Even if there is no [email protected] evidence of a significant change in the level of corruption, corruption in the Balkan country shapes political dynamics, resulting in the capture of political decision making and the political control of independent institutions, the judiciary and the legislature. The progress made in anti-corruption has been more RELATED U4 MATERIAL on paper than in practice, with the implementation of those Western Balkans and Turkey: reforms being the main challenge. Overview of Corruption and Anti- Corruption Corruption and doing business in Serbia Helpdesk Answers are tailor-made research briefings compiled in ten working days. The U4 Helpdesk is a free research service run in collaboration with Transparency International. Query How has corruption evolved in the past 10 years in Serbia? To what extent is corruption connected to political dynamics and social norms? Give an overview of anti-corruption initiatives in Serbia. Contents MAIN POINTS — In the last ten years there has not been a 1. Introduction significant change in the level of corruption 2. Evolution of corruption in the last 10 years in Serbia. a. Extent of corruption b.
    [Show full text]
  • Kosovo - an Atypical Parliamentary Republic Prof
    Kosovo - An Atypical Parliamentary Republic Prof. Ass. Dr Murat Jashari, PhD Faculty of Law, Prishtina University, Kosovo Behar Selimi, PhD Candidate Faculty of Law, Business and Technology University, Prishtina, Kosovo Abstract The topic of this comparative study is the republican character of the system of governance in Kosovo. In the public discourse and political communication, as well as in academic discourse Kosovo is considered a Parliamentary Republic, based on the principle “of the separation of powers and checks and balances between them.” Although the constitutional definition of the relationship between the executive and legislative favors parliamentary republicanism, the constitutional powers of the president, the government and especially the constitutional and political power of the prime minister, significantly weaken the parliamentary character, in favor of a semi-presidential system. However, neither the current theories of government, nor constitutional provisions can rank Kosovo among semi-presidential systems, or pure parliamentary systems. Comparisons of competence powers relations in Kosovo, with similar relations and competences of the countries of the region and beyond, testify to the specific nature of parliamentary democracy in Kosovo. It is precisely the comparison of the Kosovo constitutional-legal system of governance with similar systems and theoretical analysis of parliamentary models facing Kosovo model which will be the basis of support of the hypothesis that Kosovo is not a typical parliamentary republic. Keywords: Kosovo; parliament; republic; prime minister; government Introduction By constitutional definition Kosovo is “a democratic Republic based on the principle of separation of powers and checks and balances between them.”1 This definition defines only the basic forms of government, leaving its type explicitly undefined.
    [Show full text]
  • UNDP RS NARS and Indepen
    The National Assembly of the Republic of Serbia Serbia AND INDEPENDENT BODIES SERBIA THE REPUBLIC OF OF ASSEMBLY NATIONAL NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA AND INDEPENDENT BODIES 253 NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA AND INDEPENDENT BODIES NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA AND INDEPENDENT BODIES Materials from the Conference ”National Assembly of the Republic of Serbia and Independent Bodies” Belgrade, 26-27 November 2009 and an Overview of the Examples of International Practice Olivera PURIĆ UNDP Deputy Resident Representative a.i. Edited by Boris ČAMERNIK, Jelena MANIĆ and Biljana LEDENIČAN The following have participated: Velibor POPOVIĆ, Maja ŠTERNIĆ, Jelena MACURA MARINKOVIĆ Translated by: Novica PETROVIĆ Isidora VLASAK English text revised by: Charles ROBERTSON Design and layout Branislav STANKOVIĆ Copy editing Jasmina SELMANOVIĆ Printing Stylos, Novi Sad Number of copies 150 in English language and 350 in Serbian language For the publisher United Nations Development Programme, Country Office Serbia Internacionalnih brigada 69, 11000 Beograd, +381 11 2040400, www.undp.org.rs ISBN – 978-86-7728-125-0 The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the United Nations and the United Nations Development Programme. Acknowledgement We would like to thank all those whose hard work has made this publication possible. We are particularly grateful for the guidance and support of the National Assembly of the Republic of Serbia, above all from the Cabinet of the Speaker and the Secretariat. A special debt of gratitude is owed to the representatives of the independent regulatory bodies; the Commissioner for Information of Public Importance and Personal Data Protection, the State Audit Institution, the Ombudsman of the Republic of Serbia and the Anti-corruption Agency.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Planning MESP – Institute for S for MESP – Institute Instituti Për Planifikim Hapësinor – Institute for Spatial Planning – Institut Za Prostorno Planiranje
    National Park “Sharr Mountain” – Spatial Development Plan g Republika e Kosovës atial Plannin Republika Kosova – Republic of Kosovo p Qeveria – Vlada – Government Ministria e Mjedisit dhe Planifikimit Hapësinor Ministarstvo Sredine i Prostornog Planiranja Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning MESP – Institute for S for MESP – Institute Instituti për Planifikim Hapësinor – Institute for Spatial Planning – Institut za Prostorno Planiranje SPATIAL PLAN NATIONAL PARK “SHARR MOUNTAIN” 1 National Park “Sharri Mountain” – Spatial Development Plan e for Spatial Planning Spatial e for t MESP – Institu NATIONAL PARK “SHARR MOUNTAIN” Draft SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN The present document has been drafted by the Institute for Spatial Planning in cooperation with relevant structures of the Government sectors, municipal governments and other various structures and levels of the Kosovar society. Attention! Competent vresion of the document is the albanian version ! 2 National Park “Sharri Mountain” – Spatial Development Plan g atial Plannin THE REPUBLIC OF KOSOVO p GOVERNMENT OF KOSOVO MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND SPATIAL PLANNING S for MESP – Institute INSTITUTE FOR SPATIAL PLANNING NATIONAL PARK “SHARR MOUNTAIN” Draft SPATIAL PLAN Prishtinë, February, 2009 3 National Park “Sharri Mountain” – Spatial Development Plan e for Spatial Planning Spatial e for t MESP – Institu 4 National Park “Sharri Mountain” – Spatial Development Plan g MAIN STAGES atial Plannin p SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT I PROFILE MESP – Institute for S for MESP – Institute VISION, PRINCIPLES
    [Show full text]