DOCSLIB.ORG

BILANCIO CONSUNTIVO Esercizio 2008

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BILANCIO CONSUNTIVO Esercizio 2008 BILANCIO CONSUNTIVO Esercizio 2008 Approvato dal Comitato d’Indirizzo nella riunione del 24 aprile 2009 Le opere pubblicate nella presente edizione del Bilancio Consuntivo 2008 sono tratte dal Fondo Pietro Annigoni appartenente alle Collezioni d’Arte dell’Ente Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze. Il Fondo Annigoni è stato acquisito nel 2007 ed oggi costituisce una parte del Museo “Pietro Annigoni” aperto al pubblico nel 2008 negli spazi di Villa Bardini a Firenze. INDICE Organi statutari 9 Relazione sulla gestione 17 – Relazione economico finanziaria (Sezione I) 22 – Bilancio di missione (Sezione II) 32 – Proposta al Comitato d’indirizzo 67 Schemi di bilancio 71 Nota integrativa 79 Allegati al bilancio 109 – Elenco degli interventi deliberati nel 2008 – Allegato 1 111 – Elenco dei beni mobili d’arte – Allegato 2 159 – Bilanci delle fondazioni strumentali – Allegato 3 169 Relazione del Collegio dei Revisori 179 BILANCIO CONSUNTIVO 2008 5 PIETRO ANNIGONI PIETRO ANNIGONI Autoritratto non finito, anni ’30 Autoritratto, 1946 olio su tela, cm 85,5x88 olio su tela, cm 46x36 6 PIETRO ANNIGONI PIETRO ANNIGONI Autoritratto, 1930 ca. Autoritratto con cappello, 1927 olio su tavola, cm 14,5x10,5 matita su carta, mm 260x205 SALA 1 - AUTORITRATTI 7 ORGANI STATUTARI in carica al 24 aprile 2009 Consiglio Presidente GREMIGNI Avv. Michele di amministrazione Vice Presidente MARACCHI Prof. Gian Piero Consiglieri BLASI Prof. Paolo GIANNOZZI Dr. Luca GINORI CONTI Ing. Ginolo LUCCHESI Avv. Franco MAROTTI Avv. Antonio MAZZEI Dr. Jacopo ROGANTINI PICCO Dr. Giuseppe SCARAMUZZI Prof. Franco SISI Prof. Carlo ZAMPI Prof. Giancarlo Collegio dei Revisori BOMPANI Prof. Aldo GALEOTTI FLORI Prof. Mario Alberto (Presidente) TANINI Dr. Francesco ASSO Dr. Paolo (Supplente) MORONI Dr.ssa Daniela (Supplente) Comitato d’Indirizzo ADORNO Francesco LEONARDI Claudio BERNI Giancarlo LOMBARDI Fernando BERTINI Ivano MARGANI Franco BUYET Alessandra MARTELLI CALVELLI Marco CANTUCCI Cesare MILETTI FERRAGAMO Wanda CASINI Leonardo NAPOLEONE Raffaello CAVINI Bruno PORCINAI Fabrizio GONDI Bernardo PRIMICERIO Mario GREGORI Mina COLONNA RIMBOTTI Maria Vittoria GUIDUCCI BONANNI Carla ROSSI FERRINI Pierluigi LAMIONI Giovanni ZILIERI DAL VERME Clemente ORGANI STATUTARI 11 Assemblea dei Soci ACIDINI Cristina DINI Dino ADORNO Francesco DODDOLI Giovanni ALOISI DEL LARDEREL Francesco ESCLAPON DE VILLENEUVE Riccardo ANTINORI Piero FARULLI Piero ARECCHI Fortunato Tito FAUCCI Riccardo ASCHENGREEN PIACENTI Kirsten FAZZINI Marcello ASSO Paolo FOLONARI Ambrogio BALDASSERONI CORSINI Barbara FRATI GUCCI Laura BARABINO Carlo FRATINI Corrado BARCALI Sandro FRESCO Paolo BARDINI Ferruccio FRESCOBALDI Vittorio BARTOLINI BALDELLI Luigi GABBRIELLI MARZILI Elena BARTOLINI SALIMBENI Uberto GALEOTTI FLORI Mario Alberto BARUCCI Piero GALGANI Vasco BASSI Stefano GAMBACCINI Piero BECHERUCCI Raffaele GENTILE Giovanni BENEDETTI Aureliano GIANNOZZI Luca BERNABEI Ettore GINORI CONTI Ginolo BERNI Giancarlo GINORI LISCI Lionardo BERTOCCHINI Ugo GIUSTINIANI Paolo BINI SMAGHI Lorenzo GONDI Bonaccorso BLASI Paolo GONDI Bernardo BOCCA Bernabo GREGORI Guglielmina BOMPANI Aldo GREMIGNI Michele BONECHI Giampaolo GROSSI Paolo BONONI Loris Jacopo GUICCIARDINI Ferdinando BORETTI Romano GUICCIARDINI CORSI SALVIATI Roberto BUITONI Bruno GUIDUCCI BONANNI Carla BUSI Giampiero LIVI BACCI Massimo BUYET Sandra LUCCHESI Franco CALAMARI Mario LUCIFERO Mario CAMPAIOLI Paolo MALENCHINI Luigi CANGIOLI Carlo MANCINI Fiorenzo CAPPONI Neri MANETTI Fabrizio CAPPUGI Luigi MANNONI Stefano CARMI Donatella MANTELLASSI Luca CARREGA BERTOLINI Raffaele MARACCHI Gian Piero CASINI Carlo Eugenio MARCHI Carlo CECCUTI Cosimo MARCHI Francesco CECCUZZI Sergio MARGANI Franco CERRINA FERONI Ginevra MARGIOTTA BROGLIO Francesco CONTINI BONACOSSI Ugo MARINELLI Augusto CORSI Francesco MAROTTI Antonio CORSINI Filippo MARTELLI CALVELLI Marco D’AYALA VALVA Giuseppe MARTINI BERNARDI Neri DE RENZIS SONNINO Nicola Leone MAZZEI Jacopo 12 BILANCIO CONSUNTIVO 2008 MENY YVES RUSSO Pasquale MIARIFULCIS Francesco SACCONI Marco MILETTI FERRAGAMO Wanda SAMOGGIA Franco MILIANTI Carlo SARTORI Giovanni MOCENNI Carlo SCARAMUZZI Franco MORBIDELLI Giuseppe SEBREGONDI Ludovica MORELLI Luigi SERRA Francesco NALDINI Maurizio SIGNORINI Giancarlo NAPOLEONE Raffaello SILIANI Pier Luigi NENCIONI Giovanni SISI Carlo NESI Carlo SPERANZA Edoardo NICCOLINI DI CAMUGLIANO Lorenzo SPINOLA Franca NORI BUFALINI Giacomo STANCANELLI Giuseppe OLIVETTI RASON Gian Paolo STANGHELLINI Lorenzo PACINI Pierfrancesco STEFANELLI Giuseppe PALLINI Marcello STROZZI GUICCIARDINI Girolamo PANCRAZI Vittorio TANINI Francesco PAOLETTI Enrico Armando TARGETTI Giampaolo PAOLUCCI Antonio TODISCO GRANDE Giuseppe PECCI Alberto TOGNOZZI MORENI Giuseppe PECORARO RICCI ARMANI Massimo TOMBARI Umberto PIANETTI LOTTERINGHI DELLA STUFA TORRICELLI Andrea Bernardo TORRIGIANI MALASPINA Vieri POGGIOLINI Foscolo UGOLINI Ermanno PONTELLO Ranieri VARVESI Gianfranco PRIMICERIO Mario VECCHIONI Federico PUCCI DI BARSENTO Laudomia VEDOVATO Giuseppe PUCCINI Lapo VELLUTI ZATI Simone RICASOLI FIRIDOLFI Bettino VERDON Timothy RIMBOTTI Giovanni VICIANI Franco ROGANTINI PICCO Giuseppe ZAMPI Giancarlo ROGARI Sandro ZANARDI LANDI Antonio ROGGI Piero ZANI Zito ROSSELLI DEL TURCO Niccolo ZANIERI Carlo ROSSI FERRINI Pierluigi ZILERI DAL VERME Clemente RUCELLAI Cosimo ORGANI STATUTARI 13 PIETRO ANNIGONI PIETRO ANNIGONI Ritratto di Ricciarda, 1970 Ritratto di Anna Maggini Annigoni, 1954 tempera grassa su carta incollata su tavola, cm 60x40 tempera grassa su tavola, cm 60x40 14 PIETRO ANNIGONI PIETRO ANNIGON Volto di donna (Rossella Segreto), anni ’70 Ritratto di donna (La strega) litografia, mm 700x500 matita e inchiostro su carta, mm 620x380 SALA 2 - RITRATTI FEMMINILI 15 RELAZIONE SULLA GESTIONE Redatta dal Consiglio di Amministrazione PREMESSA Durante la scorsa Legislatura, conclusasi all’inizio del 2008, è proseguita la stasi della produ- zione legislativa riguardante le Fondazioni Bancarie, confermando in tal modo che il contesto normativo nel quale questi organismi operano si sta consolidando, dopo le importanti sentenze della Corte Costituzionale del settembre 2003. Dopo quelle due sentenze le Fondazioni avevano auspicato un intervento legislativo di riorga- nizzazione della disciplina delle associazioni e delle fondazioni che procedesse ad una riforma del Titolo II del Libro I del codice civile. Ma i lavori avviati dalla Commissione Pinza insediata presso il Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze non sono stati terminati a causa dell’antici- pata conclusione della Legislatura. È da augurarsi che l’iter della riforma riprenda, così da ade- guare la disciplina delle persone giuridiche private alle mutate esigenze che la società odierna presenta rispetto a quelle che nel 1942 diedero origine all’attuale disciplina. Le Fondazioni auspicano anche l’emanazione del regolamento in materia di bilancio previ- sto dall’art. 9 del d.lgs n. 153 del 1999, regolamento che, invece, pur annunciato più volte, non risulta ancora pubblicato. La situazione transitoria si prolunga ormai dall’aprile 2001, anno in cui l’Autorità di vigilanza fornì, per il bilancio relativo all’esercizio 2000, le indica- zioni che da allora sono prese dalle Fondazioni come riferimento per la redazione dei bilanci annuali. Pur in mancanza di quanto sopra il quadro di sostanziale stabilità normativa ha consentito alle Fondazioni di concentrarsi sulla propria missione e sulla propria strategia operativa, adeguan- dosi ai cambiamenti in corso nella società italiana, e di verificare l’adeguatezza dei propri mo- delli organizzativi rispetto al quadro normativo di riferimento ed alle esigenze operative con- nesse con l’attuazione delle scelte strategiche operate per la promozione del territorio di rife- rimento. Le Fondazioni si stanno quindi adoperando per attivare al meglio il loro potenziale di cataliz- zatori sociali, grazie all’acquisita affidabilità ed alla loro capacità di coinvolgere altri soggetti operanti sul territorio e di fare rete, innovando la loro operatività e promuovendo nuove ini- ziative per rispondere in maniera propositiva alle istanze locali. L’obiettivo è di valorizzare a fa- vore dei territori di riferimento, secondo la visione e la libertà d’iniziativa di ciascuna, la capa- cità finanziaria e le competenze delle Fondazioni per il sostegno dei processi di sviluppo locale e di innovazione sociale, assecondando forme innovative di intervento in grado di coniugare adeguatamente rendimenti sociali ed economici per la collettività. In aderenza a quanto dispone in materia l’art. 9 del Decreto Legislativo n. 153 del 19 Maggio al termine di ogni esercizio finanziario l’Ente dispone un documento contabile – il Bilancio Con- suntivo – allo scopo di dare conto dell’attività svolta nel corso dell’anno precedente. Il docu- mento è composto dello Stato patrimoniale, del Conto economico e della Nota integrativa. RELAZIONE SULLA GESTIONE 19 Inoltre, è corredato da una Relazione sulla Gestione che è redatta dagli Amministratori ed è suddivisa in due sezioni: I Sezione – Relazione economico finanziaria II Sezione – Bilancio di Missione La Relazione Economica e Finanziaria illustra la situazione sia economica che finanziaria della Fondazione, l’andamento della gestione e i risultati ottenuti nella gestione finanziaria del pa- trimonio, la strategia d’investimento adottata, i fatti di rilievo avvenuti dopo la chiusura del- l’esercizio e l’evoluzione prevedibile della gestione economica e finanziaria. Il Bilancio di Missione invece illustra gli obiettivi sociali perseguiti dalla Fondazione
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Destructive Pigment Characterization
    Looking for common fingerprints in Leonardo’s pupils through non- destructive pigment characterization LETIZIA BONIZZONI 1*, MARCO GARGANO 1, NICOLA LUDWIG 1, MARCO MARTINI 2, ANNA GALLI 2, 3 1 Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi di Milano, , via Celoria 16, 20133 Milano (Italy) 2 Dipartimento di Scienza dei Materiali, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, via R. Cozzi 55, 20125 Milano (Italy) and INFN, Sezione Milano-Bicocca. 3 CNR-IFN,piazza L. da Vinci, 20132 Milano (Italy). *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract Non-invasive, portable analytical techniques are becoming increasingly widespread for the study and conservation in the field of cultural heritage, proving that a good data handling, supported by a deep knowledge of the techniques themselves, and the right synergy can give surprisingly substantial results when using portable but reliable instrumentation. In this work, pigment characterization was carried out on twenty-one Leonardesque paintings applying in situ XRF and FORS analyses. In-depth data evaluation allowed to get information on the colour palette and the painting technique of the different authors and workshops. Particular attention was paid to green pigments (for which a deeper study of possible pigments and alterations was performed with FORS analyses), flesh tones (for which a comparison with available data from cross sections was made) and ground preparation. Keywords pXRF, FORS, pigments, Leonardo’s workshop, Italian Renaissance INTRODUCTION “Tristo è quel discepolo che non ava[n]za il suo maestro” - Poor is the pupil who does not surpass his master - Leonardo da Vinci, Libro di Pittura, about 1493 1. 1 The influence of Leonardo on his peers during his activity in Milan (1482-1499 and 1506/8-1512/3) has been deep and a multitude of painters is grouped under the name of leonardeschi , but it is necessary to distinguish between his direct pupils and those who adopted his manner, fascinated by his works even outside his circle.
    [Show full text]
  • Mona Lisa: a Comparative Evaluation of the Different Versions S
    ONA LISA: A COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THE MDIFFERENT VERSIONS AND THEIR COPIES Salvatore Lorusso* Dipartimento di Beni Culturali Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, Ravenna, Italy Andrea Natali Dipartimento di Beni Culturali Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, Ravenna, Italy Keywords: “Mona Lisa”, versions, copies 1. Introduction In a previous study [1], which included stylistic and diagnostic analyses, it was found that the oil painting on canvas “Mona Lisa with columns”, part of a private collection in a museum in St. Petersburg (Figure 1), is a copy of the “Mona Lisa” by Leonardo (Figure 2) dating to a period between 1590 and 1660. Noteworthy features include the good quality, readability and expressiveness emanating from the work, which presum- ably is of Nordic influence, specifically German-Flemish. Figure 1. Photograph in the visible of the painting “Mona Lisa with Columns”, St. Petersburg (oil on canvas 63.2 x 85.2 cm ) CONSERVATION SCIENCE IN CULTURAL HERITAGE * Corresponding author: [email protected] 57 Figure 2. The Louvre “Mona Lisa” More specifically, given the importance of the subject, which includes Leonardo’s well-known masterpiece, the conclusion that was reached in defining the above paint- ing a copy of the original, involved examining, from a methodological point of view, investigations carried out in 2004 on the Louvre “Mona Lisa” by the “Center for Re- search and Restoration of the Museums of France”, and published in “Au coeur de La Joconde – Léonard de Vinci Décodé”. This sequence of investigations – which were certainly not aimed at authentication – were examined together with those of the Na- tional Gallery in London, thus enabling comparisons to be made with other works by Leonardo [2-3].
    [Show full text]
  • Decoding the Last Supper
    HOUSE OF TRUTH | TOTUUDEN TALO Decoding the Last Supper The Great Year and Men as Gods House of Truth | www.houseoftruth.education 21.6.2013 Table of Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 2 The Last Supper and the Great Year .................................................................................................................. 3 36 engravings on the roof ............................................................................................................................. 4 Elements of the Last Supper .......................................................................................................................... 5 Hands of Christ .............................................................................................................................................. 6 The Lesser Conclusion ................................................................................................................................... 7 Men as Gods in the Last Supper ........................................................................................................................ 8 Roman trio of gods ........................................................................................................................................ 9 Evidence number 153 .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Scuola Circle 芬奇与他的艺术群体
    31.5 — 25.8.2019 Venezia, Fondazione Ugo e Olga Levi 芬奇与他的艺术群体 E LA SUA GRANDE SCUOLA AND HIS OUTSTANDING CIRCLE 31.5 — 25.8.2019 Venezia, Fondazione Ugo e Olga Levi 芬奇与他的艺术群体 E LA SUA GRANDE SCUOLA AND HIS OUTSTANDING CIRCLE A cura di | Curator | 展览策展人 Nicola Barbatelli 尼古拉·巴尔巴泰利 Nota introduttiva di | Introduced by | 序言 Giovanna Nepi Scirè 乔凡娜·内皮·希雷 LEONARDO LEONARDO E LA SUA GRANDE SCUOLA AND HIS OUTSTANDING CIRCLE Palazzo Giustinian Lolin ospita fino al 25 agosto 2019 un importante tributo al genio Palazzo Giustinian Lolin hosts until 25 August 2019 an important tribute to the genius of di Leonardo Da Vinci, in occasione delle celebrazioni del cinquecentenario dalla Leonardo Da Vinci, on the occasion of the celebrations marking the 500th anniversary of scomparsa: la mostra “Leonardo e la sua grande scuola”, a cura di Nicola Barbatelli. Leonardo da Vinci’s death: the exhibition “Leonardo and His Outstanding Circle”, curated by Con 25 opere esposte – di cui due disegni attribuiti al genio toscano – il progetto pone Nicola Barbatelli. Proposing a collection of 25 works — among which two drawings attributed l’accento non solo sull’opera del grande Maestro, ma soprattutto sulle straordinarie to the Tuscan genius —, this project does not merely focus on the work of the great master, pitture dei suoi seguaci – tra cui Giampietrino, Marco d’Oggiono, Cesare da Sesto, but above all on the extraordinary paintings of his followers — including Giampietrino, Marco Salaì, Bernardino Luini – e il loro dialogo con la poetica artistica di Leonardo. d’Oggiono, Cesare da Sesto, Salaì, Bernardino Luini — and their dialogue with Leonardo’s artistic poetics.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy subm itted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6’ x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. ProQuest Information and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road. Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. NOTE TO USERS Copyrighted materials in this document have not been filmed at the request of the author. They are available for consultation at the author’s university library.
    [Show full text]
  • Chiara Matteucci Department of Cultural Heritage – University of Bologna
    Reflecting on fundamental issues of attributional method (Taking Leonardo da Vinci and his school as a paradigm) Chiara Matteucci Department of Cultural Heritage – University of Bologna Authentication in Art (AiA), Congress 11-13 May 2016 Nowadays diagnostic technologies have allowed to expant the number of characteristic properties detectable in a painting, such as the techniques used and the modus operandi of an artist, narrowing the field to those issues that are more difficult to fake. In this view, the diagnostic analyses for the attribution and authentication provide information, as obje ctive as possible, which, however, need a broader interpretation that integrate them in a historical context. In order to do so, it is also essential to keep an "ethos of transparence and verifiability [...] guaranteeing intersubjectivity of mutual communication"1. We should consider attributional studies as evolving as a construction/deconstruction process: experts should therefore be prepared to questioning their views, if new documents or material elements are discovered that raise doubts about their initial thesis2. In addition, the inevitable, but known and therefore graspable, "confirmation bias"3 should be taken into account, which, acting either in positive or negative ways, directs the subject engaged in connoisseurship towards the exclusive primary research of compatible elements or, on the contrary, the exclusive consideration of factors that are not congruent. As known, the current practice of attribution accepted both in the legal field and for commercial use is based on three key lines4: connoisseurship, or visual inspection by a knowing eye5, provenance studies and scientific investigations (Figure 1). The latter are currently used primarily as support for the expert's decision.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rediscovered Watermark in the Drawing Leda and the Swan by Raphael Kept at Windsor Castle
    arts Article The Rediscovered Watermark in the Drawing Leda and the Swan by Raphael Kept at Windsor Castle Claudio Calì Design Department, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy; [email protected] Abstract: This article presents an in-depth study of Raphael’s drawing of Leda and the Swan (RCIN 912759), preserved at Windsor Castle. The research aims to make the paper’s physical properties accessible and extend the information on the watermark. The methodology follows an artistic– design-oriented approach. The data extraction process uses a back-lighting photographic technique combined with image post-processing operations. The work catalogues in scientific terms the complete paper mould lines of the Windsor sheet according to the International Standard of Paper Classification (IPH). Based on comparisons with a series of drawings by Leonardo da Vinci, the contribution suggests a chronological and provenance estimate of the paper used by Raphael. Keywords: Raphael; Leonardo da Vinci; Leda; design; paper-based watermark; digitisation; graphical representation; image-processing; art; preservation 1. Introduction The drawing Leda and the Swan in the Royal Collection at Windsor Castle, RCIN 912759, dated 1507, is one of Raphael’s best-known mythological studies and conceivably Citation: Calì, Claudio. 2021. The among the most remarkable portraits on paper dedicated to the figure of Leda. The Rediscovered Watermark in the examination of the drawing from life came about almost by chance. A research visit to Drawing Leda and the Swan by Windsor was made to analyse the paper supports of a series of drawings made by Leonardo Raphael Kept at Windsor Castle. Arts da Vinci.
    [Show full text]
  • Programma Di Sala2
    Anniversario Firenze della morte di Sabato 22 settembre, ore 21 MONSIGNOR Chiesa di San Filippo Neri GIANCARLO SETTI Piazza San Firenze Concerto di musica sacra in memoria di Monsignor Giancarlo Setti PROGRAMMA «Ho scritto il mio Requiem senza motivo… per il piacere di farlo, se così posso dire. César Franck È stato eseguito alla Madeleine PANIS ANGELICUS dalla Messe Solennelle Op.12 per le esequie di un Antonio Vivaldi parrocchiano qualunque». DOMINE DEUS dal Gloria RV 589 Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart «Si è detto che quest’opera non LAUDATE DOMINUM esprime il terrore della morte; da Vesperae solennes de Confessore KV 339 qualcuno l’ha chiamata una berceuse funebre. Gabriel Fauré Eppure è così che io sento la REQUIEM in re min. Op. 48 morte: come una lieta per soli, coro e orchestra da camera (versione 1893) liberazione, un’aspirazione alla felicità dell’aldilà e non un GAMS Ensemble doloroso trapasso». Gruppo Polifonico Quodlibet Vocalia Consort «Può darsi che io abbia tentato Soprano Elena Mariani di uscire dalle convenzioni, Baritono Filippo Becattini dopo tutti gli anni in cui ho Organista Francesco Giannoni accompagnato all’organo le funzioni funebri. Ho voluto fare Direttore Massimo Annibali un’altra cosa». Maestro del coro Gianni Franceschi Gabriel Fauré REQUIEM REQUIEM Pie Jesu Pie Jesu Pie Jesu, Domine, dona eis requiem; Pietoso Signore Gesù, dona loro il riposo; Introït Introito Dona eis requiem, sempiternam requiem. dona loro il riposo, il riposo eterno. Requiem aeternam, dona eis Domine: L’eterno riposo dona loro, Signore, et lux perpetua luceat eis. e splenda ad essi la luce perpetua. Agnus Dei Agnus Dei Te decet hymnus Deus, in Sion, Si innalzi un inno a te, o Dio, in Sion, Agnus Dei, qui tollis peccata mundi, Agnello di dio, che togli i peccati del mondo, et tibi reddetur votum in Ierusalem.
    [Show full text]
  • Sebastiano Del Piombo and His Collaboration with Michelangelo: Distance and Proximity to the Divine in Catholic Reformation Rome
    SEBASTIANO DEL PIOMBO AND HIS COLLABORATION WITH MICHELANGELO: DISTANCE AND PROXIMITY TO THE DIVINE IN CATHOLIC REFORMATION ROME by Marsha Libina A dissertation submitted to the Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland April, 2015 © 2015 Marsha Libina All Rights Reserved Abstract This dissertation is structured around seven paintings that mark decisive moments in Sebastiano del Piombo’s Roman career (1511-47) and his collaboration with Michelangelo. Scholarship on Sebastiano’s collaborative works with Michelangelo typically concentrates on the artists’ division of labor and explains the works as a reconciliation of Venetian colorito (coloring) and Tuscan disegno (design). Consequently, discourses of interregional rivalry, center and periphery, and the normativity of the Roman High Renaissance become the overriding terms in which Sebastiano’s work is discussed. What has been overlooked is Sebastiano’s own visual intelligence, his active rather than passive use of Michelangelo’s skills, and the novelty of his works, made in response to reform currents of the early sixteenth century. This study investigates the significance behind Sebastiano’s repeating, slowing down, and narrowing in on the figure of Christ in his Roman works. The dissertation begins by addressing Sebastiano’s use of Michelangelo’s drawings as catalysts for his own inventions, demonstrating his investment in collaboration and strategies of citation as tools for artistic image-making. Focusing on Sebastiano’s reinvention of his partner’s drawings, it then looks at the ways in which the artist engaged with the central debates of the Catholic Reformation – debates on the Church’s mediation of the divine, the role of the individual in the path to personal salvation, and the increasingly problematic distance between the layperson and God.
    [Show full text]
  • The Scientific Narrative of Leonardoâ•Žs Last Supper
    Best Integrated Writing Volume 5 Article 4 2018 The Scientific Narrative of Leonardo’s Last Supper Amanda Grieve Wright State University Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/biw Part of the Ancient, Medieval, Renaissance and Baroque Art and Architecture Commons, Classical Archaeology and Art History Commons, and the International and Area Studies Commons Recommended Citation Grieve, A. (2018). The Scientific Narrative of Leonardo’s Last Supper, Best Integrated Writing, 5. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by CORE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Best Integrated Writing by an authorized editor of CORE Scholar. For more information, please contact library- [email protected]. AMANDA GRIEVE ART 3130 The Scientific Narrative of Leonardo’s Last Supper AMANDA GRIEVE ART 3130: Leonardo da Vinci, Fall 2017 Nominated by: Dr. Caroline Hillard Amanda Grieve is a senior at Wright State University and is pursuing a BFA with a focus on Studio Painting. She received her Associates degree in Visual Communications from Sinclair Community College in 2007. Amanda notes: I knew Leonardo was an incredible artist, but what became obvious after researching and learning more about the man himself, is that he was a great thinker and intellectual. I believe those aspects of his personality greatly influenced his art and, in large part, made his work revolutionary for his time. Dr. Hillard notes: This paper presents a clear and original thesis about Leonardo da Vinci’s Last Supper that incorporates important scholarly research and Leonardo’s own writings. The literature on Leonardo is extensive, yet the author has identified key studies and distilled their essential contributions with ease.
    [Show full text]
  • Bilancio Sociale Degli Enti Non Profit Esperienze Toscane
    QUADERNI DI STUDI E RICERCHE 12 QUADERNI DI STUDI E RICERCHE 1. Luciano Zannotti, /LEHUWjGLLQVHJQDPHQWRHLQVHJQDPHQWRGHOODOLEHUWj, 2001 2. Vincenzo Cavaliere, Dario Rosini, 'DDPPLQLVWUDWRUHDPDQDJHULOGLULJHQWHSXEEOLFRQHOOD JHVWLRQHGHOSHUVRQDOHHVSHULHQ]HDFRQIURQWR, 2002 3. Maria Antonietta Rovida, /DFDVDFRPH³EHQHGLFRQVXPR´QHOOHRSHUD]LRQLLPPRELOLDULGL )UDQFHVFR6DVVHWWL, 2003 4. Maria Antonietta Rovida, 3DOD]]LVHQHVLWUD H 0RGHOOLDELWDWLYLHDUFKLWHWWXUDWUD WUDGL]LRQHHLQQRYD]LRQH, 2003 5. /LQHDJXLGDSHUODSURJHWWD]LRQHGLXQVLVWHPDGLJHVWLRQHSHUODTXDOLWjGLXQFRUVRGLVWXGL XQLYHUVLWDULR a cura di Bruno Zanoni, Erminio Monteleone, Claudio Peri, 2004 6. Fabrizio F.V. Arrigoni, 1RWHVXSURJHWWRHPHWURSROL, 2004 7. /DSURJHWWD]LRQHGHOODFLWWjSRUWXDOH6SHULPHQWD]LRQLGLGDWWLFKHSHUXQDQXRYD/LYRUQR,a cura di Manlio Marchetta, 2004 8. Leonardo Trisciuzzi, Barbara Sandrucci, Tamara Zappaterra, ,OUHFXSHURGHOVpDWWUDYHUVR O¶DXWRELRJUDILD, 2005 9. Elena Rotelli, ,OFDSLWRORGHOODFDWWHGUDOHGL)LUHQ]HGDOOHRULJLQLDO;9VHFROR, 2005 10. Stefano Cordero di Montezemolo, ,SURILOLILQDQ]LDULGHOOHVRFLHWjYLQLFROH, 2005 11. Riccardo Passeri, Leonardo Quagliotti, Christian Simoni, 3URFHGXUHFRQFRUVXDOLHJRYHUQR GHOO¶LPSUHVDDUWLJLDQDLQ7RVFDQD, 2005 Luca Bagnoli Maurizio Catalano ,OELODQFLRVRFLDOHGHJOLHQWLQRQSURILW HVSHULHQ]HWRVFDQH Firenze University Press 2005 Il bilancio sociale degli enti non profit : esperienze toscane / Luca Bagnoli, 0DXUL]LR&DWDODQR±)LUHQ]H)LUHQ]HXQLYHUVLW\SUHVV 4XDGHUQLGLVWXGLHULFHUFKH8QLYHUVLWjGHJOL6WXGLGL)LUHQ]H http://digital.casalinLLW 6WDPSDDULFKLHVWDGLVSRQLEile
    [Show full text]
  • A Multidisciplinary Study of the Tongerlo Last Supper 0722
    A Multidisciplinary Study of the Tongerlo Last Supper and its attribution to Leonardo da Vinci’s Second Milanese studio Jean-Pierre Isbouts, Fielding Graduate University, Santa Barbara, CA, and Christopher Brown, Brown Discoveries, LLC, North Carolina This article presents the findings from a two-year study of the Last Supper canvas in the Abbey of Tongerlo, Belgium, including a detailed review of its provenance as well as a digital analysis and multispectral study conducted by the Belgian company IMEC in the Spring of 2019. The design of the study is a composite multidisciplinary approach, with traditional connoisseurship and literary research being augmented by scientific examination, using new digital processing and multispectral imaging techniques. The article argues that based on the available evidence, the Tongerlo Last Supper was produced in Leonardo’s Milanese workshop between 1507 and 1509, as a collaborative project involving the Leonardeschi Giampietrino, Andrea Solario and Marco d’Oggiono under Leonardo’s supervision. Furthermore, the infrared spectography scans suggest that the face of John in the painting may have been painted by Leonardo himself. The study was funded by IMEC Belgium; Fielding Graduate University of Santa Barbara, CA; Brown Discoveries, LLC of North Carolina, and conducted with the gracious permission of the Premonstratensian Abbey of Tongerlo, Belgium. Key words: Leonardo da Vinci (1452-1519); Last Supper; Technical Art History; Multispectral Imaging; the art of the Leonardeschi. Fig. 1. Studio of Leonardo da Vinci, Last Supper (after Leonardo), known as the Tongerlo copy, 1507-1509. Introduction For the last 450 years, the Tongerlo canvas of the Last Supper has been quietly occupying a wall in a chapel on the grounds of the Premonstratensian Abbey of Tongerlo near Westerlo, about an hour’s drive from the Belgian city of Antwerp.
    [Show full text]