Historical Background Essay/Industrial and Commercial Contexts
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Usair Flight 1016, a DC-9-31, Which Crashed Near the Charlotte/Douglas International Airport, Charlotte, North Carolina, on .Luly 2, 1994
3 r . ii! 4 F z \ \ \ I -- _. - NTSB/AAR-95/03 PB959 10403 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD - WASHINGTON, D.C. 20594 _ -~ .~ AIRCRAFT AWPENT REPORT FLIGHT MT0 TERRAIN DURING MISSED APPROACH USAIR FLIGHY 1016, DC-9-31, N954VJ CHARLOTTE/DOUGLAS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT CHARLOll-E, NORTkl CAROLINA JULY 2,1994 Adopted; April 4,1996- Notation 6413A - - PROTECTED UNDER Hll%NATKlNAL COWRIGHT ALl. RIGHTS RESERVED. NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFOAMATKW SERVICE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Abstract: This report explains the accident involving USAir flight 1016, a DC-9-31, which crashed near the Charlotte/Douglas International Airport, Charlotte, North Carolina, on .luly 2, 1994. Safety issues in the report include standard operating procedures for flightcrews and air traffic controllers, the dissemination of weather information to flightcrews, and flightcrew training. Safety recommendations concerning these issues were made to the Federal Aviation Administration, USAir, and the National Weather Service. - The National Transportation Safety Board is an^‘independent Federal agency dedicated tx~ promoting aviation, railroad, highway, marine, pipeline, and hazudous materials safety. Establishedi in 196?, the agency is mandated by Congress through the Independent Safety Board Act of 1974 to investigate transportation accidents, determine the probable causes sb _ --. the accidents, issue safety recommendations,.- study transportation safety issues, and evaluate _ _ _ the safety effectiveness of government agencies involved in transportation. The Safctjf Board makes public its actions and decisions through accident reports, safety studies, special investigation reports, safety recommendations, and statistical reviews. Information about available pubiications may be obtained by contacting: National Transportation Safety Board Public Inquiries Section, RE-51 490 L’Enfant Plaza, S.W. -
CENTER CITY: the Business District and the Original Four Wards
THE CENTER CITY: The Business District and the Original Four Wards By Dr. Thomas W. Hanchett The history of Charlotte's Center City area is largely a story of what is no longer there. The grid of straight streets that lies within today's innermost expressway loop was the whole of Charlotte less than one hundred years ago. Today it contains a cluster of skyscrapers, three dozen residential blocks, and a vast area of vacant land with only scattered buildings. This essay will trace the Center City's development, then look at the significant pre-World War II structures remaining in each of the area's four wards. The Center City has experienced three distinct development phases as Charlotte has grown from a village to a town to a major city. In the first phase, the area was the entire village. It was what geographers term a "walking city," arranged for easy pedestrian movement with the richest residents living the shortest walk to the commercial core. This era lasted from settlement in 1753 through the 1880s. In 1891 the new electric trolley system transformed Charlotte into a "streetcar city" with new suburbs surrounding the old village. In the old Center City the commercial core expanded, clustered around the trolley crossroads at Independence Square. Residence continued to be important, and the area continued to grow in population, but now the wealthy moved outward to the suburbs and the middle class and poor moved inward. In the 1930s and 1940s the automobile replaced the trolley as Charlotte's prime people mover, and the Center City changed again. -
Industry, Transportation and Education
Industry, Transportation and Education The New South Development of Charlotte and Mecklenburg County Prepared by Sarah A. Woodard and Sherry Joines Wyatt David E, Gall, AIA, Architect September 2001 Introduction Purpose The primary objective of this report is to document and analyze the remaining, intact, early twentieth-century industrial and school buildings in Charlotte and Mecklenburg County and develop relevant contexts and registration requirements that will enable the Charlotte- Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks Commission and the North Carolina Historic Preservation Office to evaluate the individual significance of these building types. Limits and Philosophy The survey and this report focus on two specific building types: industrial buildings and schools. Several of these buildings have already been listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Nevertheless, the increase in rehabilitation projects involving buildings of these types has necessitated the creation of contexts and registration requirements to facilitate their evaluation for National Register eligibility. The period of study was from the earliest resources, dating to the late nineteenth century, until c.1945 reflecting the large number of schools and industrial buildings recorded during the survey of Modernist resources in Charlotte, 1945 - 1965 (prepared by these authors in 2000). Developmental History From Settlement to the Civil War White settlers arrived in the Piedmont region of North Carolina beginning in the 1740s and Mecklenburg County was carved from Anson County in 1762. Charlotte, the settlement incorporated as the Mecklenburg county seat in 1768, was established primarily by Scots-Irish Presbyterians at the intersection of two Native American trade routes. These two routes were the Great Wagon Road leading from Pennsylvania and a trail that connected the backcountry of North and South Carolina with Charleston. -
Post World War II Survey Study
Final Report: Post World War Two Survey Sherry Joines Wyatt & Sarah Woodard for David E. Gall Architects. Click here to see National Register eligible properties UNCC students in the History 6000 Historic Preservation class spent hours examining newspapers and journals of the post-World War Two era. Without their work this report would have been impossible to produce. Click here to see the results of the students' work. In 1945, the western world was emerging from a long, dark tunnel of economic depression and world-wide war. In the United States, the light at the end of that tunnel illuminated the deficiencies and shortages left after years focused solely on survival. Thus, with the conclusion of war, the country rushed to satisfy the needs and wants of a population overwhelmed and exhilarated by returning servicemen and a newly invigorated economy. The post-war years saw common citizens experience economic prosperity not previously known. This, in turn, sparked a renewal and explosive expansion of trends begun in the wealthy 1920s. Some of the most notable and important of these patterns, with respect to the built environment, were suburban expansion, transportation improvements and accessibility, and a renewed interest in Modernist ideas about architecture. These three national trends created the three local contexts of community planning, transportation, and architecture in which Charlotte’s post-war Modernist architecture developed. An examination of these contexts and the dynamic changes in the booming, post-war New South City of Charlotte between 1945 and 1965 can serve as a case study of the historical climate in which post-war architecture evolved throughout North Carolina. -
December 4, 1978.Pdf
December 4, 1978 Minute Book 69 - Page 367 The City Council· of the City of Charlotte, North Carolina, met in a regul session on Monday, December 4, 1978; at 3:00 o'clock p. m., with Mayor Kenneth R. Harris presiding, and Councilmembers Don Carroll, Betty Chafin, Tom Cox, Jr., Charlie Dannelly, Ron Leeper, Pat Locke, George K. Selden, , H. Milton Short and Minette Trosch present. ABSENT: Councilmembers Laura Frech and Harvey B. Gantt. *** * * * INVOCATION. The invocation was given by The Right Reverend Monsignor Hugh Dolan, St. Gabriel's Catholic Church. RESOLUTION EXTENDING SYMPATHY AND HONORING THE MEMORY OF CLAUDE L. ALBEA. Councilmember Short stated he had the privilege of serving on City Council with the late Claude Albea; he was a beloved personage in this community many years; and it is with a sense of bereavement that he reads the 10wi'nQ" resolution: WHEREAS, the City Council is saddened by the death of Claude L. Albea on Friday, November 24, 1978; and WHEREAS, Claude Albea was a former member of the City Council, having served seventeen terms for a total of 34 years of public service between 1931 and 1968; and WHEREAS, Mr. Albea was admired for his interest in Charlotte and all of its people and. was a strong supporter of essential planning and zoning so that Charlotte could grow in an orderly fashion, and also served on the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Planning Commission and the Selective Service Board of Appeals; and WHEREAS, the City of Charlotte is indebted to him for his years of valuable service and dedication to his position and to our connnunity. -
Biennial Report of the North Carolina Office of Archives and History
FIFTY-THIRD BIENNIAL REPORT OF THE NORTH CAROLINA OFFICE OF ARCHIVES AND HISTORY July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2010 Raleigh Office of Archives and History North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources 2011 ©2011 by the North Carolina Office of Archives and History All rights reserved NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CULTURAL RESOURCES LINDA A.CARLISLE Secretary OFFICE OF ARCHIVES AND HISTORY JEFFREY J. CROW Deputy Secretary DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES DAVID L. S. BROOK Director DIVISION OF STATE HISTORIC SITES KEITH P. HARDISON Director DIVISION OF STATE HISTORY MUSEUMS KENNETH B. HOWARD Director NORTH CAROLINA HISTORICAL COMMISSION JERRY C. CASHION (2013) Chairman VACANT Vice-Chairman Millie M. Barbee (2009) B. Perry Morrison Jr. (2011) Mary Lynn Bryan (2011) Freddie L. Parker (2013) David C. Dennard (2015) Barbara Blythe Snowden (2013) Paul D. Escott (2013) Richard Starnes (2011) Valerie A. Johnson (2015) Harry L. Watson (2011) EMERITI: Kemp P. Burpeau, N. J. Crawford, H. G. Jones, William S. Powell, Alan D. Watson, Max R. Williams CONTENTS Deputy Secretary’s Report Education Branch Roanoke Island Festival Park Tryon Palace USS North Carolina Battleship Memorial Division of Historical Resources Collections Management Branch Research Branch Western Office Archives and Records Section Historical Publications Section Office of State Archaeology Historic Preservation Office Division of State Historic Sites and Properties East Region Piedmont Region West Region North Carolina Transportation Museum State Capitol Division of State History -
Ÿþm I C R O S O F T W O R
NORTH CAROLINA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE Office of Archives and History Department of Cultural Resources NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES Home Federal Building Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, MK2173, Listed 1/30/2008 Nomination by Cynthia de Miranda Photographs by Cynthia de Miranda, ?? Façade and side view Side view with elevator tower NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 10024-0018 (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking “x” in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter “N/A” for “not applicable.” For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name Home Federal Building other names/site number 2. Location street & number 139 South Tryon Street not for publication N/A city or town Charlotte vicinity N/A state North Carolina code NC county Mecklenburg code 119 zip code 28202 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set for in 36 CFR Part 60. -
National Register of Historic Places Weekly Lists for 2008
National Register of Historic Places 2008 Weekly Lists January 4, 2008 ............................................................................................................................................. 3 January 11, 2008 ......................................................................................................................................... 10 January 18, 2008 ......................................................................................................................................... 16 January 25, 2008 ......................................................................................................................................... 26 February 1, 2008 ........................................................................................................................................ 33 February 8, 2008 ........................................................................................................................................ 44 February 15, 2008 ...................................................................................................................................... 55 February 22, 2008 ...................................................................................................................................... 59 February 29, 2008 ....................................................................................................................................... 63 March 7, 2008 ............................................................................................................................................ -
CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, March 24, 2014
City Council Agenda Mayor Patrick D. Cannon Mayor Pro Tem Michael D. Barnes Al Austin Patsy Kinsey John Autry Vi Lyles Ed Driggs LaWana Mayfield Claire Fallon Greg Phipps David L. Howard Kenny Smith CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, March 24, 2014 In addition to the previously advertised public hearing items, Departments have asked that the time sensitive items listed below not be deferred. Item # Page # Title 57 56 Property Transactions: ‒ Parcel #4 and #9; Prosperity Ridge Connection ‒ Parcel #6; Prosperity Ridge Village Northwest Arc A ‒ Parcel #46, #47, and #50; Johnston Oehler Farm to Market ‒ Parcel #88, Oakdale Road Widening March 24, 2014 City Council Agenda CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Monday, March 24, 2014 Table of Contents 4:00 P.M. DINNER BRIEFING, CONFERENCE CENTER _________________ 1 1.Mayor and Council Consent Item Questions _____________________________ 1 2.Riverbend Steam Station Coal Ash Due Diligence Review___________________ 1 3.Privatization and Competition Advisory Committee Update _________________ 1 Attachment 1 _________________________________________________ 2 4.Proposed 2014 State Legislative Agenda________________________________ 2 Attachment 2 _________________________________________________ 2 5.Answers to Mayor and Council Consent Item Questions ____________________ 3 6.Closed Session ____________________________________________________ 3 Introductions _______________________________________________ 4 Invocation __________________________________________________ 4 Pledge of Allegiance __________________________________________ -
KINGSPORT TIMES Deaths 1 13 WILL Hurt Them Injuries 171 224 It's Only One Step from Cut* Vol
What Peop/t Traffic In '59 City County Don't Know KINGSPORT TIMES Deaths 1 13 WILL Hurt Them Injuries 171 224 It's Only One Step From Cut* Vol. XLV, No. 1 Kingiport, Term., Frida/, January 1,1960 20 Pages Five Cents To Coffin. U.S. Preparing Strategy To Halt WORLD WELCOMES I960 Strike Renewal By WILLIAM J. EATON WITH BUOYANT HOPES WASHINGTON (UPD—The ad- ministration is stepping up its be- By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS old decade, and a gladsome greet- services. Parades and football French President Charles de hind-the-scenes efforts U> settle A high-hearted world cheered in ing to the Sixties. Optimism, was games were the highlights in sev- Gaulle foresaw "expansion and the steel dispute and avert a re- 1960 today with buoyant hopes that the dominant note. eral places today. progress" as the keynotes of 1960. sumption of the strike later this good days lie ahead. British Prime Minister . Harold For the Soviet Union, the cele- Even in trouble spots, there was month. In most countries, it was one of Macmillan. in a special message, bration was mostly in homes, but jubilance. Every amusement place The new government strategy the gayest celebrations in years. looked forward in 1960 to "relief Moscow's streets were crowde^ In Taipei, on Formosa, was was disclosed Thursday when Many national leaders saw pros- from the heavy burcfen of arms." and sparkled with decorations. packed. All was quiet on the off- Vice President Richard M. Nixon pects for mounting prosperity, and U.S. Secretary of State Christian Premier Nikita Khrushchev shore islands, the Chinese Com- and Labor Secretary James P. -
Notes About Scotch-Irish and German Settlers in Virginia and the Carolinas
Notes about Scotch-Irish and German Settlers in Virginia and the Carolinas Copyright © 2000–2009 by William Lee Anderson III. All rights reserved. Scotch-Irish and German Settlers in Virginia and the Carolinas Introduction During the 1700s many Scotch-Irish and German immigrants arrived in America. They and their children settled parts of Pennsylvania, Virginia, and the Carolinas. Today, most of their descendants never think about their heritage. Most live in the present, are working on real-life problems, or planning their future. That attitude was shared by their ancestor immigrants 250 years ago. Nonetheless, I suspect most descendants have at least wondered what the word Scotch-Irish means. All my life, I have heard various facts, but never understood how they fit together. Some facts appeared contradictory. So, I investigated, and discovered a colorful story that far exceeded my expectations. My principal objectives were to: Understand certain comments made by grandparents and other relatives over 40 years ago. Understand the confusing adjective Scotch-Irish. Understand the confusing cultural icons of bagpipes, kilts, Celtic whistles, etc. Understand the history of Moravian, Lutheran, Mennonite, Amish, Dunkards, Presbyterian, Puritanism, Huguenot, Quaker, Methodist, Congregational, and Baptist denominations that have churches in the Carolinas. Understand why and when surnames became common. Understand ancestor Margaret Moore‘s recollections of the Siege of Londonderry in 1689. Understand motivations of Scotch-Irish and German immigrants during the 1700s and terms of their Carolina land grants. Understand relations between early Carolina immigrants and Native Americans. Understand why Scotland‘s heroine Flora Macdonald came to live in North Carolina in 1774. -
December 19, 1983 Resolution Book 20 - Page 1
December 19, 1983 Resolution Book 20 - Page 1 MINUTES OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTE CITY COUNCIL December 19, 1983 The City Council of the City of Charlotte met in a regular meeting in the Board Room on the 4th Floor of the Education Center in Charlotte, North Carolina, at 6:00 P.M. on December 19, 1983. Present: ~~M~a~y~o~r~G~a~nt~t=-~ __~ ____~~_ presidtng, and Council members Dannelly, Frech, Hammond, .Juneau, I eeper, Myrick, Patt;erson, Spaugh, Trosch, Vinroot and Woo 11 en Absent: None. Also Present: Henry W. Underhill, City Attorney, announced that the City has been requested by R. Malloy McKeithen and B. Bernard Burns!, Jr. (collectively the "Borrower") to agree to provide financin'g for the renovation, construction, equipping and installation of the Borrower's building (the "Project") located at 123 East Trade Street in the City of Charlotte, for purposes of eliminating existing blight and preventing future blight in the Area 2 of the Charlotte Redevelopment Area. Mr. Underhill also announceid that the Borrower had obtained a commitment from First Union National Bank ("FUNB") to make a loan under the Separate Loan Program adopted by the City by which FUNB will purchase a Note of the City in the amount of $380,000.00, the proceeds of which will be loaned by the City to the Borrower for the purpose of constructing the Project. Mr. Underhill advised that in connection with such loan application, it was necessary that a public hearing be held and that a proper Notice of Public Hearing describing the proposed loan and the Project had been published in The Charlotte Obser:ver on December 2, 1983.