DOCSLIB.ORG

Plan Directeur Des Parcs Et Des Espaces Publics.Docx

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Plan Directeur Des Parcs Et Des Espaces Publics.Docx i ÉQUIPE DE TRAVAIL DIRECTION Hadi Hakim, directeur du Service des travaux publics Dany Gariépy, chef de la Division des espaces verts du Service des travaux publics COORDINATION ET RÉDACTION Sylvie Lafitte, architecte paysagiste coordonnatrice de projet Jean‐Philippe Grou, architecte paysagiste coordonnateur de projet Andrée Roy, agente espaces verts AVEC LA COLLABORATION DE Maude Roy, architecte paysagiste Daniel Boyer, ingénieur forestier Annick St‐Denis, conseillère professionnelle en environnement durable Geneviève Bédard, conseillère professionnelle en milieux naturels Division des espaces verts Centre d’excellence en géomatique Service de la culture, des loisirs, du sport et du développement social Service des communications et du marketing Division de la planification du territoire du Service de l’urbanisme Division des plans directeurs et Division de la circulation et du transport du Service de l’ingénierie REMERCIEMENT SPÉCIAL Josianne Garon‐Labrecque Thien Quoc Nam Nguyen Irina Cucovici Lyne Quenneville Marguerite Simard‐Thivierge Juan Torres Sergent Dominic Fortin Agent Alexandre Langelier PHOTO DE LA PAGE COUVERTURE Photo modifiée de Olivier Blouin i Les parcs, les jardins et les terrains de récréation sont de même nécessaires. Non pas tant parce qu’ils ajoutent à la valeur des terrains de la ville, ce qui est pourtant une de leurs conséquences, que parce qu’ils doivent nous apporter la lumière, l’air et la vue de coins de verdure, réconfortante, rafraîchissante, au milieu des fatigues et des soucis quotidiens de la vie des grandes villes. Aussi parce qu’ils permettent aux enfants, aux jeunes gens, à tous les habitants, de vivre quelques heures chaque jour en plein air, ce qui est indispensable, surtout à mesure que la ville s’accroît… JEAN‐CLAUDE NICOLAS FORESTIER ii TABLE DES MATIÈRES ÉQUIPE DE TRAVAIL ............................................................................................................................................ i TABLE DES MATIÈRES ........................................................................................................................................ iii LISTE DES FIGURES .............................................................................................................................................vi LISTES DES TABLEAUX ...................................................................................................................................... viii ACRONYMES ...................................................................................................................................................... ix DÉFINITIONS ....................................................................................................................................................... xi AVANT‐PROPOS ................................................................................................................................................ xii SOMMAIRE ....................................................................................................................................................... xiv 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Motif du Plan directeur des parcs et des espaces publics ........................................................................ 1 1.2 But et objectifs .......................................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Portée ....................................................................................................................................................... 3 2 Mise en contexte ....................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Historique ................................................................................................................................................. 5 Espaces publics ................................................................................................................................................... 5 Parcs ................................................................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Tendances et phénomènes sociaux .......................................................................................................... 6 Étude sur la santé ............................................................................................................................................... 6 Usages ................................................................................................................................................................ 8 Culture ................................................................................................................................................................ 9 Environnement ................................................................................................................................................... 9 Berges ................................................................................................................................................................. 9 2.3 Organismes spécialisés ........................................................................................................................... 10 2.4 Système de parcs .................................................................................................................................... 10 Historique ......................................................................................................................................................... 10 Tendance .......................................................................................................................................................... 12 2.5 Contexte géographique et urbanistique ................................................................................................. 12 Développement des parcs et des espaces publics lavallois .............................................................................. 13 Démographie et développement social ........................................................................................................... 14 2.6 Cadre de planification ............................................................................................................................. 15 Urbaine de nature ............................................................................................................................................ 15 Schéma d’aménagement et de développement révisé (SADR) ........................................................................ 15 Trame verte et bleue lavalloise ........................................................................................................................ 16 Autres cadres de planification .......................................................................................................................... 17 2.7 Cadre légal .............................................................................................................................................. 19 iii 2.8 Cadre réglementaire lavallois ................................................................................................................. 19 2.9 Participation citoyenne et partenariats .................................................................................................. 20 Participation citoyenne .................................................................................................................................... 20 Partenariats ...................................................................................................................................................... 20 3 Méthodologie ........................................................................................................................................... 21 3.1 Approche ................................................................................................................................................ 21 3.2 Démarches de projet et outils ................................................................................................................ 22 Terminologie .................................................................................................................................................... 23 Revue de la littérature ...................................................................................................................................... 25 Consultations .................................................................................................................................................... 25 Collecte de données ......................................................................................................................................... 27 Découpage du territoire ................................................................................................................................... 28 Fiches d’analyse par USS .................................................................................................................................. 28 Classification typologique des parcs et des espaces publics ...........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ar Ba to Rig Re Ht Ms
    Canadian eview V olume 42, No. 4 Right to BaRe Arms Dress Guidelines in British Columbia’s Legislative Assembly p. 6 2 CANADIAN PARLIAMENTARY REVIEW/SUMMER 2019 There are many examples of family members sitting in parliaments at the same time. However, the first father-daughter team to sit together in a legislative assembly did not happen in Canada until 1996. That is when Sue Edelman was elected to the 29th Yukon Legislative Assembly, joining her re-elected father, Ivan John “Jack” Cable. Mr. Cable moved to the North in 1970 after obtaining degrees in Chemical Engineering, a Master’s in Business Administration and a Bachelor of Laws in Ontario. He practiced law in Whitehorse for 21 years, and went on to serve as President of the Yukon Chamber of Commerce, President of the Yukon Energy Corporation and Director of the Northern Canada Power Commission. He is also a founding member of the Recycle Organics Together Society and the Boreal Alternate Energy Centre. Mr. Cable’s entry into electoral politics came in 1992, when he successfully won the riding of Riverdale in East Whitehorse to take his seat in the Yukon Legislative Assembly. Ms. Edelman’s political presence had already been established by the time her father began his term as an MLA. In 1988, she became a Whitehorse city councillor, a position she held until 1994. In her 1991 reelection, she received more votes for her council seat than mayor Bill Weigand received. Following her time on city council, she was elected to the Selkirk Elementary School council. In the 1996 territorial election, she ran and won in the Riverdale South riding.
    [Show full text]
  • Briefing Book — Appearance Before the Standing Committee On
    Briefing Book Appearance Before the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development March 10th, 2021 Issue Subject TAB Portfolio Accomplishments (ECCC) Accomplishments 1 Parks Canada Achievements 2020-21 Progress on Mandate Letter (ECCC) Mandate Letter ECCC Mandate Letter 2 ECCC Supplementary Mandate Letter 2020-2021 Overview of PCA’s 2020-21 Supp. Estimates C 5 Supplementary Estimates C PCA’s 2020-21 Supplementary Estimates C 6 2021-2022 Main Overview of PCA’s 2021-22 Main Estimates 9 Estimates PCA’s 2021-22 Main Estimates 10 Departmental Plan Overview of PCA’s 2021-2022 Departmental Plan 14 PCA’s COVID Response COVID-19 16 Deferred Payment & Rent Relief Nature-based Climate Solutions (ECCC) 22 Climate Change Species at Risk (ECCC) Nature and Wildlife Species at Risk (PCA) 27 Measures to protect Caribou in Jasper National Park Mountain Pine Beetle New Parks and Historic Sites Account 34 2020 Minister’s Roundtable on Parks Canada 35 Parks Canada Agency Wood Buffalo National Park World Heritage Site Action 36 Plan Implementation Visitation in 2020 40 Implementation of the Service Fees Act at Parks Visitation 41 Canada Bow Valley Moving People Sustainably 42 Protected Areas Establishment 43 Land Acquisitions 44 Nature Legacy 45 Urban Parks 46 Conservation Aquatic Contaminated Site Assessment and Monitoring in Yoho National Park, Waterton Lakes National Park 47 and Gulf Islands National Park Reserve using Passive Sampling Devices Advancing Federal Legislation for Historic Places 48 Consolidation of the Collection Under Parks
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Parks in Canada: Life Cycle of a Landscape, March 1984; Cities of the World Supplement; Recent Publications Notes Et Commentaires
    Document generated on 09/24/2021 8:34 a.m. Urban History Review Revue d'histoire urbaine --> See the erratum for this article Notes and Comments The Metropolis: A Conference in Honour of Hans Blumenfeld; Urban Parks in Canada: Life Cycle of a Landscape, March 1984; Cities of the World Supplement; Recent Publications Notes et commentaires Perspectives on Sports and Urban Studies Volume 12, Number 2, October 1983 URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1018961ar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1018961ar See table of contents Publisher(s) Urban History Review / Revue d'histoire urbaine ISSN 0703-0428 (print) 1918-5138 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this document (1983). Notes and Comments: The Metropolis: A Conference in Honour of Hans Blumenfeld; Urban Parks in Canada: Life Cycle of a Landscape, March 1984; Cities of the World Supplement; Recent Publications. Urban History Review / Revue d'histoire urbaine, 12(2), 103–105. https://doi.org/10.7202/1018961ar All Rights Reserved © Urban History Review / Revue d'histoire urbaine, 1983 This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit. Érudit is a non-profit inter-university consortium of the Université de Montréal, Université Laval, and the Université du Québec à Montréal. Its mission is to promote and disseminate research. https://www.erudit.org/en/ Notes and Comments/Notes et commentaires THE METROPOLIS: similar spaces in Canadian towns and cities.
    [Show full text]
  • Vancouver Park Board Has Established the Original Planting Scheme, Including a Number of Tree Species Referenced in Shakespeare’S Plays
    THE NATIONAL PARKS AND LES PARCS NATIONAUX ET LES NATIONAL HISTORIC SITES OF CANADA LIEUX HISTORIQUES NATIONAUX DU CANADA Stanley Park national historic site of canada Commemorative Integrity Statement Commemorative Integrity Statement Approved: Christina Cameron, Director General, National Historic Sites Parks Canada Jim Barlow, Field Unit Superintendent Coastal B.C. Field Unit Parks Canada Ms. Susan Mundick, General Manager Vancouver Board of Parks and Recreation NOVEMBER, 2002 Table of Contents Preface How to Use this Commemorative Integrity Statement Acknowledgements 1.0 Introduction 1.1 National Historic Sites Objectives.....................................1 1.2 Definition and Purpose of Commemorative Integrity......................1 1.3 Historical and Geographical Contexts..................................2 2.0 Commemorative Intent 2.1 Commemorative Context............................................5 2.2 Definition of Commemorative Intent...................................6 2.3 Statement of Commemorative Intent...................................6 3.0 Treatment of the Three Elements of Commemorative Integrity 3.1 First Element The resources that symbolize or represent the site’s national historic significance are not impaired or under threat 3.1.1 Designated Place ............................................7 Physical Values ...........................................8 Symbolic Values .........................................11 Objectives ...............................................11 3.1.2 Natural Elements of the Commemorative
    [Show full text]
  • Assiniboine Park Governance Study
    Assiniboine Park Governance Study February 2006 (Revised) Prepared by The Acumen Group with HILDERMAN THOMAS FRANK CRAM Landscape Architecture • Planning 500-115 Bannatyne Avenue East, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3B 0R3 Telephone 204•944•9907 Facsimile 204•957•1467 Table of Contents Overview 1 Nature of the Assignment 5 Assiniboine Park in Retrospect 7 The Compelling Case for Change 13 Methodology 17 Current Governance Reality 19 Principles and Criteria for Good Governance 27 Lessons Learned 29 Governance Options 35 Recommendations 47 Appendix and References (Bound Separately) Figures Figure 1 - Assiniboine Park Map 9 Figure 2 - Assiniboine Park & Forest Map 11 Figure 3 - Current Organizational Structure 21 Figure 4 - Best Practices Matrix 31 Figure 5 - Conservancy Option I 39 Figure 6 - Conservancy Option II 43 Figure 7 - Criteria/Models Matrix 45 Assiniboine Park Governance Study - February 2006 (Revised) i Overview In April, 2005, Assiniboine Park Enterprise (“APE”) mandated The Acumen Group in collaboration with Hilderman Thomas Frank Cram, and their team (“the Project Team”) to complete a governance review regarding Assiniboine Park (“the Park”) and make recommendations on options for its future leadership and organization. This report is organized into nine sections, the principal seven of which include: • The Compelling Case for Change: while an attractive physical presence, the Park is long overdue for an updated strategic plan, contemporary fundraising program, and modernized organizational structure to revitalize its luster and status as a tourist destination for the city and the province. • Current Governance Reality: a summary of how the Park is organized now, including the role of the City of Winnipeg (“the City”) and its various functional contributors, the different not-for-profit organizations and their leadership roles within the Park, and a strengths/weaknesses/opportunities/threats (“SWOT”) analysis of the present governance situation.
    [Show full text]
  • 1.5 Million DNA Barcodes, Voucher Specimens, and Genomic Samples
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/701805; this version posted July 14, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. A reference library for the identification of Canadian invertebrates: 1.5 million DNA barcodes, voucher specimens, and genomic samples Authors Jeremy R. deWaard*, Sujeevan Ratnasingham*, Evgeny V. Zakharov*, Alex V. Borisenko, Dirk Steinke, Angela C. Telfer, Kate H.J. Perez, Jayme E. Sones, Monica R. Young, Valerie Levesque-Beaudin, Crystal N. Sobel, Arusyak Abrahamyan, Kyrylo Bessonov†, Gergin Blagoev, Stephanie L. deWaard, Chris Ho, Natalia V. Ivanova, Kara K. S. Layton#, Liuqiong Lu, Ramya Manjunath, Jaclyn T.A. McKeoWn, Megan A. Milton, Renee Miskie, Norm Monkhouse, Suresh Naik, Nadya Nikolova, Mikko Pentinsaari, Sean W.J. Prosser, Adriana E. Radulovici, Claudia Steinke, Connor P. Warne, and Paul D.N. Hebert*+ Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada * Equal contributions † Present address: Public Health Agency of Canada, Guelph, Ontario, Canada # Present address: Ocean Frontier Institute, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada + Corresponding author: Paul Hebert ([email protected]) Abstract The reliable taxonomic identification of organisms through DNA sequence data requires a Well parameterized library of curated reference sequences. HoWever, it is estimated that just 15% of described animal species are represented in public sequence repositories. To begin to address this deficiency, We provide DNA barcodes for 1,500,003 animal specimens collected from 23 terrestrial and aquatic ecozones at sites across Canada, a nation that comprises 7% of the planet’s land surface.
    [Show full text]
  • The Canadian City Parks Report
    2020 The Canadian City Parks Report Highlighting the trends, challenges, and leading practices in 27 Canadian cities to inspire action, share learning, and track progress in city parks across the country. Foreword Our cities’ green spaces have Thank you to the team at Park People for continuing to develop this valuable resource never been more important as for city parks’ management and staff. Our communities grapple with the Foundation is proud to support this important realities of a global pandemic. work and are grateful for all that Park People does to improve equity and inclusion, and increase connections to urban parks in Canada. Parks have been closed, and then opened, and then filled beyond capacity. Whether you are a frontline I also want to recognize and thank the dozens of worker, a single parent with restless children, or are municipal staff who took the time out of already experiencing homelessness, our city parks have busy schedules to give Park People the data and become essential spaces to restore our physical and stories needed to create this report. We hope you mental well-being at a stressful and uncertain time. continue to find it a valuable and useful tool to share best practices and spark conversations for The Canadian City Parks Report is an in-depth the betterment of our parks and our cities. look at the state of these essential parks in municipalities across the country. This year’s It is reassuring to see growing commitment report focuses on the importance of urban to improving biodiversity in cities across the biodiversity, and the role that city parks can play country from volunteers, staff and city leaders.
    [Show full text]
  • MAKING BIOPHILIC CONNECTIONS: CREATING a GREEN SPACE NETWORK in TORONTO by Alyssa Sandra Cerbu Master of Science, Mcgill Univers
    MAKING BIOPHILIC CONNECTIONS: CREATING A GREEN SPACE NETWORK IN TORONTO By Alyssa Sandra Cerbu Master of Science, McGill University, 2013 Bachelor of Commerce, McGill University, 2012 A Major Research Paper Presented to Ryerson University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Planning In Urban Development Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2019 © Alyssa Cerbu 2019 Author’s Declaration for Electronic Submission of a MRP I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this MRP. This is a true copy of the MRP, including any required final revisions. I authorize Ryerson University to lend this paper to other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. I further authorize Ryerson University to reproduce this MRP by photocopying or by other means, in total or in part, at the request of other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. I understand that my MRP may be made electronically available to the public. 2 MAKING BIOPHILIC CONNECTIONS: CREATING A GREEN SPACE NETWORK IN TORONTO © Alyssa Cerbu 2019 Master of Planning In Urban Development Ryerson University Abstract The City of Toronto is facing unprecedented population growth, placing an increased demand on existing parkland green spaces. With intensification only projected to increase and limited opportunities to develop parkland, the City must explore other complimentary methods to protect and grow access to nature. This paper will explore the possibility for other urban green spaces to provide natural connectivity between parkland and ravines through biophilic design. Biophilic design underscores the importance of daily contact with nature in order for people to have happy lives.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper and Lower Case Letters to Be Used
    EXPLORING THE UTILIZATION OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES FOR THE NEW PARKS IN THE MUNICIPALITIES OF THE GREATER TORONTO AREA A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of Graduate Studies of The University of Guelph by AMIR ARDESHIR NIKZAD In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Landscape Architecture September, 2011 © Amir Ardeshir Nikzad, 2011 ABSTRACT EXPLORING THE UTILIZATION OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES FOR THE NEW PARKS IN THE MUNICIPALITIES OF THE GREATER TORONTO AREA Amir Ardeshir Nikzad Advisor: University of Guelph, 2011 Professor Lise Burcher Sustainable urban parks provide social and economical benefits to the residents and contribute to the urban ecosystem health. Municipalities are responsible for development and management of urban parks and the goal of this study was to better understand if, and why, the municipalities in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) have utilized sustainable development strategies in the planning, design, construction and management for their new park projects. A qualitative study utilizing an in-depth interview format was created based on the principles of sustainable development compiled from the Sustainable Sites Initiative. A sample of four municipalities in the GTA was selected based on population and development growth and the park authorities were contacted. The results indicated few sustainable initiatives implemented in the design and management stages of park development. Understanding the constraints against these suggest that there may be potential to increase the sustainability of urban parks. Keywords: Urban sustainability, Best Management Practices, SITES ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My utmost gratitude goes to my thesis advisor and mentor, Professor Lise Burcher for her kindness, expertise and most of all her patience.
    [Show full text]
  • Doing Business in Canada
    BUSINESS IN CANADA DOING BUSINESS IN CANADA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Canada is structured, both politically and commercially, Canada is one of the world’s most economically developed and how the country’s history has shaped its present. countries, with a standard of living, infrastructure and industrial base that closely resemble its southern HISTORY neighbor, the United States. Canada and the U.S. share According to ConsiderCanada.com, Canada — an the largest land border in the world, stretching from the Anglicization of the Iroquois word “kanata,” meaning Pacific Northwest to the Maine/New Brunswick border. The “settlement” or “village,” — is the world’s second-largest countries also share the waters of four of the five Great country by total area, surpassed by only Russia. Located Lakes. almost entirely north of the 45th parallel, the country The length of the border, and the proximity of major ranges from temperate climates in its more densely Canadian and American cities to the border, have created populated southern regions to a polar climate in the gateways for culture and commerce that have allowed the sparsely populated Arctic north. Due to the extreme two countries to profoundly impact one another. variations in climate, the vast majority of Canada’s Canadian businesses and governments welcome population resides in the far south of the country, where investment from entities in both the U.S. and beyond. major cities such as Vancouver, Winnipeg, Montreal, the But in order to do business in Canada, outside business national capital of Ottawa and the country’s largest city, investors must gain a detailed understanding of how Toronto, are located.
    [Show full text]
  • Fully Accounting for Canada's Conservation Lands
    Fully Accounting for Canada’s Conservation Lands – Phase II: Assessing the Protection and Conservation Value of 12 Property Clusters Managed by the Conservation Authorities and Partners in Ontario December 2018 Fully Accounting for Canada’s Conservation Lands – Phase II: Assessing the Protection and Conservation Value of 12 Property Clusters Managed by the Conservation Authorities and Partners in Ontario December 2018 Paul A. Gray, Thomas J. Beechey, Christopher J. Lemieux, Jocelyn Sherwood, Annette Morand, Allan G. Douglas and Andrea Kettle The contract is managed by the Ontario Centre for Climate Impacts and Adaptation Resources (OCCIAR). The principal contact is: Al Douglas Director, OCCIAR MIRARCO/Laurentian University Sudbury, ON, Canada 705-675-1151 x1506 www.climateOntario.ca The Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) contact is: Andrea Kettle Biodiversity Coordinator Environment and Climate Change Canada – Canadian Wildlife Service Toronto, ON, Canada 416-739-4918 Recommended Citation: Gray, P.A., T.J. Beechey, C.J. Lemieux, J. Sherwood, A. Morand, A.G. Douglas and A. Kettle. 2018. Fully Accounting for Canada’s Conservation Lands – Phase II: Assessing the Protection and Conservation Value of 12 Property Clusters Managed by the Conservation Authorities and Partners in Ontario. Ontario Centre for Climate Impacts and Adaptation Resources (OCCIAR), MIRARCO/Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada. Cover Photos: 1 - Morris Island Conservation Area (photo credit: Mississippi Valley Conservation Authority) 2 – Murray Marsh
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Golf Course Landscapes in Canada, 1873-1945
    Behind the Greens: Understanding Golf Course Landscapes in Canada, 1873-1945 by Elizabeth Liane Jewett A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of History University of Toronto © Copyright by Elizabeth Liane Jewett, 2015 Abstract Behind the Greens: Understanding Golf Course Landscapes in Canada, 1873-1945 Elizabeth Liane Jewett Doctor of Philosophy Department of History University of Toronto 2015 Between 1873 and 1945, the golf course emerged as a distinct landscape category in Canada. During this transformative period of golf development, the course, as a landscape, revealed particular human and human/non-human interactions. To explore these associations, the term ‘golfscape’ signals the course’s literal and ideological construction as simultaneously a playing field and manifestation of nature. Gendered sport identities existed within these golfscapes and reinforced class-based and racialized relationships as well as Anglo-Canadian and Canadian/American connections. Traditional British golfing canon collided with the cultural and environmental realities of Canada to create a unique social and physical space. An examination of private, public, and resort course locations across the country illustrates how clubs positioned and promoted their playing fields within an urbanizing and diversifying country. For example, golfscape game and aesthetic features prompted private and public interests to integrate golf into nature tourism within Canada’s national parks during this time. Clubs, however, were held to certain appearance and playability standards, whether in the wilderness of the Rocky Mountains or in the rural-urban fringe that fueled product experimentation and creation. Trends towards professionalism and expertise as well as recognition of the diversity of the country’s climates and geographies created room for golf architects and ii agricultural scientists to position themselves as authorities with the power to experiment and disseminate knowledge and practices to the wider culture.
    [Show full text]