Regeneration in Liverpool: REGENERATION IS ONE of the Major Themes a Ff E C T E D by the Regeneration Process in Liverpool, of the Current Political Agenda

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Regeneration in Liverpool: REGENERATION IS ONE of the Major Themes a Ff E C T E D by the Regeneration Process in Liverpool, of the Current Political Agenda Pe r s p e c t i ve s of Ur b a n Re g en er a t i o n Regeneration in Liverpool: REGENERATION IS ONE of the major themes a ff e c t e d by the regeneration process in Liverpool, of the current political agenda. Large sums of to examine current best practice in regeneration 1 An Examination of Current Policies money are available specifically to arrest and and discuss in a non-confrontational way that Symposium 24 February 2004 reverse decline experienced in so many towns could lead to a greater shared understanding. A and cities throughout the country. The nature of series of presentations from acknowledged this funding and the way it has to be spent raises experts gave a local/ national/ international new questions about accountability and how the perspective of urban regeneration and then a regeneration agenda is controlled, who and what discussion session, involving the invited experts, drives it forward and ultimately what are we sought to bring this into a Liverpool context and trying to achieve when we begin a regeneration allowed delegates to raise issues that were process. important to their organisations. By its very nature regeneration of an area The focus of the seminar day was on means change and change is not always the economic, urban design, environmental, welcome. Proposals designed to bring about health and social inclusion aspects of urban i m p r o v e m e n t s can lead to bitter conflicts and regeneration and the aim was to question there is often tension between what is perceived prevailing orthodoxies by getting different and as the ‘greater good’ and the needs and challenging views. aspirations of the communities most affected by the proposed developments. Some of the speakers’ presentations, and parts of afternoon discussion, are reproduced The aim of this conference was to bring verbatim in this report, transcribed from an audio people together from organisations involved in or tape recording. n PHOTO: LIVERPOOL VISION / WILKINSON EYRE o Joining Up the Thinking – Executive Summary 2-3 Contents o 1965 – 2005: a Sense of Perspective 4-9 Speech by Professor Peter Batey o Healthy Housing still on the Agenda 10-15 Speech by Dr Kate Ardern o Local Sustainability at the Heart of Regeneration Policy 16-21 Speech by Molly Conisbee o Regeneration in Liverpool – a Personal Perspective 22-29 Speech by John Flamson o “Re-kindling the Passion of Liverpool’s People” 30-35 Speech by Andrea Titterington o Conclusions 36-39 COVER PHOTO: KERSTIN MORITZ o Acknowledgements and Delegate List 40 PHOTOS (FROM LEFT):KERSTIN MORITZ; WWW. JOHNBIRDSALL.CO.UK; KRISTIN KARLSSON PHOTOS (FROM LEFT):KERSTIN MORITZ; KRISTIN KARLSSON; WWW. JOHNBIRDSALL.CO.UK 2 3 itself quickly places whole communities in need deprivation’ is recognised, remain to be solved. of “regenerating”. Conversely, evidence points to This does not mean we should abandon Joining Up the Thinking a ‘local multiplier effect’. ‘flagships’ or lose the nerve to “do big things”. Where planning policy favours large multiple AN D R E A TI T T E R I N G T O N brings an essentially THE FOLLOWING PAGES record the proceedings of to the optimism of the ‘60s; but adds a note stores and distantly run corporations, and this is practical perspective – while seeing good a unique event. This symposium, held on 24 of caution: projects must be manageable, combined with a lack of investment in skills regeneration practice as not only “transforming February 2004, was originally conceived by deliverable – and delivered. training for local people, there can be little wastelands” but breathing “new spiritual life” into Liverpool Friends of the Earth almost a year surprise that communities “fail”. If regeneration is communities. Her experience highlights the earlier. Prophetically conceived, perhaps. In May DR KATE ARDERN examines problems and offers something that “happens to communities” conflict of interests that occurs when a public 2004 the Government, for the first time, included possible solutions from a health perspective without their active engagement from the start, body such as Liverpool City Council is a partner environmental measures in its Index of which she characterises as both personal and both process and results will be failures. in a regeneration agency, making applications to Deprivation. It has often been implied that these social. She presents much alarming evidence. Achieving long-lasting benefits may require a itself as the planning authority. She also calls agendas are in conflict; now it is clear that Disparities in life expectancy between the slower pace, allowing for a more inclusive attention to the complexity, length and cost of regeneration means tackling environmental wealthiest and most deprived inhabitants of this manner, of regeneration: for example, training both planning and funding processes. Focussing issues along with jobs, income, health and country are far greater than in the1930s. residents to a level where they can bid for and on the Anfield/Stanley Park project, which she crime. P e o p l e ’s q ua lit y of l if e d iff ers wide ly. The carry out contracts within their communities. emphasises is far more than a stadium neighbouring wards of Speke and Woolton in development, she portrays as crucial the Speakers and indeed all participants were south Liverpool are cited. JOHN FLAMSON, in his ‘personal’ assessment, involvement and inclusion of local people. This invited purposely to reflect a balance of local acknowledges that regeneration means different became a lively subject of the afternoon ‘ q u e s t i o n government, health, environmental, community, Health itself is a “joining up” of other issues. things to different people. Partnerships and t i m e ’, with the panel of morning speakers business and academic backgrounds. We all pay a high economic cost for the poor targets are politically essential at present. Not chaired by the BBC’s North West political editor They presented and debated the theme of health in our society. Poor insulation of our hous- only have Local Strategic Partnerships been Jim Hancock. A somewhat ‘streamlined’ version ‘regeneration’ from a number of distinct and ing stock causes many more winter deaths in the devised to broaden participation in planning policy, of this is presented here, respecting the complementary perspectives. Some six months UK than in Siberia. Transport links are vital to but the regeneration company Liverpool Vision is ‘Chatham House rules’: comments are not after the symposium, and with waves still rocking health: why is there no bus service from the itself a partnership. Targets potentially prove attributed to individuals. Naturally, a wide range the Mersey regeneration boat after the apparent Speke-Netherley area – home to Liverpool’s delivery (and earn votes). He notes the interesting of del egates raised a wide range of issues, capsizing of the ‘Fourth Grace’ project, it seems highest proportion of lone parents, the majority tension between the UK government’s r e f l e c t i n g the perspectives of most concern to the timely to publish the proceedings and reflect on without a car – to Alder Hey Children’s Hospital? preoccupation with its national economy and the contributors. all aspects of this lively and challenging Subjecting new developments – and underlying EU’s more regional approach. Also relevant are ‘examination’. policies – to Health Impact Assessments, of the fundamentally unresolved relationships THE COMMON THREAD is a desire for “joined up which the government now recognises the value, between national government, the North West thinking” between organisations, across themes, PROFESSOR PETER BATEY provides a historical is one key way to integrate health and well being Development Agency and NW Regional disciplines, human and environmental and policy context, reviewing four decades of into regeneration programmes. A s s e m b l y. needs…and for ownership by all parties. planning initiatives: from slum clearance and Whether all of these can be blended into a new towns in the 1960s to today’s Objective MOLLY CONISBEE’S ‘localisation’ approach may be Raw GDP figures suggest regeneration i s complementary whole or certain contradictions One-funded growth clusters and enterprise described as social-cultural. Her stark figures working in Liverpool. But they fail to reflect the need also to be owned, faced and resolved is a zones. show how fast communities are losing local serious gap between rich and poor, between the clear challenge for all the participants. With this services – shops, banks, post offices. The plain city and other parts of the surrounding region, in mind, a set of brief conclusions from the He wonders if, in the present ‘Capital fact is that if people cannot draw cash in an area and between regions of the country. Many issues respective steering group members completes of culture’ era, Liverpool’s outlook is returning their local spend will plummet – a spiral that in of social justice, in an era when ‘multiple this report. n 1965 to 2005 4 5 a S en s e of Pe r s p e c t i ve Q&A WHAT AM I GOING TO TALK ABOUT? It says in the programme “introduction”. One of the things that I think it is very important to do in this field is to After the series of presentations in the have a sense of perspective and, perhaps, a morning, which gave a broad overview of all sense of recent history in relation to regeneration. the different perspectives of regeneration, It’s quite a short history but it’s an important one most of the afternoon was given over to a and Liverpool and Merseyside are important discussion session, allowing delegates to places in terms of this history of regeneration.
Recommended publications
  • South Australia Privatisation Inquiry Evidence
    LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA SELECT COMMITTEE ON THE PRIVATISATION OF PUBLIC SERVICES IN SOUTH AUSTRALIA Global, State and City dimensions of privatisation Submission by: Dexter Whitfield Director, European Services Strategy Unit Adjunct Associate Professor, Australian Industrial Transformation Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide Structure of the evidence The Select Committee was established to inquire into and report on the privatisation of public services in South Australia, with particular reference to (a) The cost to the public of privatised services. (b) The quality of privatised services and the outcomes for the public, particularly with respect to disadvantaged members of the public. (c) The impact on employment rates, conditions and locations, especially rural and regional employment. (d) The effect on income and wealth inequality. (e) The effect on public participation, social cohesion, and public perception of the role of government; and (f) Any other related matters. This evidence follows the five main headings preceded by a brief analysis of the scope and global dimension of privatisation. It concludes with proposals for an alternative strategy, summary of main findings and recommendations. The evidence in this submission is based on 48 years-experience advising, researching and working with local, regional and national authorities, community organisations and local and national trade unions on the provision of public services and infrastructure projects in the UK, Ireland and many other countries. It has included published national and global research identifying the direct and indirect impact of privatisation and marketisation for national and international organisations. Developing alternative strategies and policies is another key aspect of this work. The European Services Strategy Unit is committed to social justice, by the provision of good quality public services and jobs by democratically accountable public bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • Paddington Village Spatial Regeneration Framework October 2016
    Paddington Village Spatial Regeneration Framework October 2016 DRAFT Executive Summary The University of Liverpool, Royal Liverpool • Complementary life science uses University Hospital, The School of Tropical Medicine and Liverpool John Moores University • Creation of a new residential neighbourhood; occupy a substantial area at the eastern periphery and of Liverpool City Centre and make an important • Associated infrastructure, public realm and a contribution to the City and regional economy, new urban park particularly in terms of knowledge-based indus- tries including bio-sciences, health-related The opportunity has the potential to deliver over research and digital technology. Together this 1 million sqft of science and research develop- “Knowledge Quarter” provides an unrivalled ment and create upwards of 10,000 highly skilled concentration of expertise, knowledge and wealth- jobs and thereby significantly contribute to the creating potential within a City Centre setting. City’s strategic regeneration goals. The overall aim is to increase the economic poten- This SRF has been produced to develop a set tial of the area as the delivery of a viable, vibrant of key principles and parameters to shape and and strong knowledge economy within this guide the delivery of Paddington Village as a high significant area of Liverpool City Centre is critical quality, comprehensively planned, sustainable to the future economic growth and competitive- environment creating a world-class investment ness of the City Region and will contribute to the environment for knowledge-based businesses. delivery of regional growth aspirations. It will be adopted as a Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) in accordance with the require- The Knowledge Quarter is enshrined within ments of legislation and guidance contained Council strategic policy through a Citywide and in the National Planning Policy Framework (the an area specific Strategic Investment Framework Framework).
    [Show full text]
  • LJMU Research Online
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by LJMU Research Online LJMU Research Online Mulhearn, CJ and Franco, M If you build it will they come? The boom in purpose-built student accommodation in central Liverpool: Destudentification, studentification and the future of the city http://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/9130/ Article Citation (please note it is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from this work) Mulhearn, CJ and Franco, M (2018) If you build it will they come? The boom in purpose-built student accommodation in central Liverpool: Destudentification, studentification and the future of the city. Local Economy, 33 (5). pp. 477-495. ISSN 0269-0942 LJMU has developed LJMU Research Online for users to access the research output of the University more effectively. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LJMU Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. The version presented here may differ from the published version or from the version of the record. Please see the repository URL above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription. For more information please contact [email protected] http://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/ 1 If you build it will they come? The boom in purpose-built student accommodation in central Liverpool: destudentification, studentification and the future of the city Abstract.
    [Show full text]
  • Liverpool City Region Visitor Economy Strategy to 2020
    LiverpooL City region visitor eConomy strategy to 2020 oCtober 2009 Figures updated February 2011 The independent economic model used for estimating the impact of the visitor economy changed in 2009 due to better information derived about Northwest day visitor spend and numbers. All figures used in this version of the report have been recalibrated to the new 2009 baseline. Other statistics have been updated where available. Minor adjustments to forecasts based on latest economic trends have also been included. All other information is unchanged. VisiON: A suMMAry it is 2020 and the visitor economy is now central World Heritage site, and for its festival spirit. to the regeneration of the Liverpool City region. it is particularly famous for its great sporting the visitor economy supports 55,000 jobs and music events and has a reputation for (up from 41,000 in 2009) and an annual visitor being a stylish and vibrant 24 hour city; popular spend of £4.2 billion (up from £2.8 billion). with couples and singles of all ages. good food, shopping and public transport underpin Liverpool is now well established as one of that offer and the City region is famous for its europe’s top twenty favourite cities to visit (39th friendliness, visitor welcome, its care for the in 2008). What’s more, following the success of environment and its distinctive visitor quarters, its year as european Capital of Culture, the city built around cultural hubs. visitors travel out continued to invest in its culture and heritage to attractions and destinations in other parts of and destination marketing; its decision to use the City region and this has extended the length the visitor economy as a vehicle to address of the short break and therefore increased the wider economic and social issues has paid value and reach of tourism in the City region.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstructing Public Housing Liverpool’S Hidden History of Collective Alternatives
    Reconstructing Public Housing Liverpool’s hidden history of collective alternatives Reconstructing Public Housing Liverpool’s hidden history of collective alternatives Reconstructing Public Housing Matthew Thompson LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY PRESS First published 2020 by Liverpool University Press 4 Cambridge Street Liverpool L69 7ZU Copyright © 2020 Matthew Thompson The right of Matthew Thompson to be identified as the author of this book has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication data A British Library CIP record is available ISBN 978-1-78962-108-2 paperback eISBN 978-1-78962-740-4 Typeset by Carnegie Book Production, Lancaster An Open Access edition of this book is available on the Liverpool University Press website and the OAPEN library. Contents Contents List of Figures ix List of Abbreviations x Acknowledgements xi Prologue xv Part I Introduction 1 Introducing Collective Housing Alternatives 3 Why Collective Housing Alternatives? 9 Articulating Our Housing Commons 14 Bringing the State Back In 21 2 Why Liverpool of All Places? 27 A City of Radicals and Reformists 29 A City on (the) Edge? 34 A City Playing the Urban Regeneration Game 36 Structure of the Book 39 Part II The Housing Question 3 Revisiting
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Green and Open Spaces Review Board
    Strategic Green and Open Spaces Review Board Final Report 2016 A city becomes magnificent when the spaces between the buildings equal the architecture they frame Contents Mayoral Preface .................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Chair’s Note ........................................................................................................................................................................ 8 1. The Strategic Green and Open Spaces Review Board ............................................................................................... 9 Board Members .................................................................................................................................................................................. 9 2. Overview and Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 13 Background and Context ................................................................................................................................................................. 13 Time of Austerity .............................................................................................................................................................................. 13 The Review ......................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Northwest Regional Development Agency Annual Report and Financial Statements Year Ended 31St March 2009
    Northwest Regional Development Agency Annual Report and Financial Statements Year ended 31st March 2009 Northwest Regional Development Agency Annual report and financial statements Year ended 31 March 2009 Northwest Regional Development Agency Annual Report and Financial Statements Year ended 31st March 2009 Northwest Regional Development Agency Annual report and financial statements Year ended 31 March 2009 Annual Report and Accounts presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Business Innovation and Skills in pursuance of Sections 15 (2) and 17 (3) of the Regional Development Agencies Act 1998. Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 20 July 2009 HC 819 London: The Stationery Office £15.00 © Crown Copyright 2009 The text in this document (excluding the Royal Arms and other departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the document specified. Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. For any other use of this material please write to Office of Public Sector Information, Information Policy Team, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU or e-mail: [email protected] ISBN: 9780102959338 Northwest Regional Development Agency Annual Report and Financial Statements Year ended 31st March 2009 Contents Annual report Page Chairman’s Statement 1 Chief Executive’s
    [Show full text]
  • Community Business and Anchor Institutions
    Community business and anchor institutions Centre for Local Economic Strategies February 2019 Community business and anchor institutions Contents Executive summary 2 1. Introduction 9 2. Methodology 10 2.1 Policy and literature review 10 2.2 Primary research work in three localities 10 2.3 Key findings and recommendations 11 3. Policy and literature review 12 3.1 Anchor institutions 12 3.2 Community businesses 15 3.3 Anchor institutions and community business 19 3.4 What are the challenges associated with anchor institutions and community businesses working collaboratively? 24 3.5 The policy landscape 25 4. Evidence from Liverpool, Bristol and Ipswich 27 4.1 Liverpool 28 4.2 Ipswich 31 4.3 Bristol 34 5. Key learning and recommendations 38 5.1 Community businesses 38 5.2 Anchor institutions 40 5.3 Local policymakers 41 5.4 National policymakers 42 5.5 The community 44 Bibliography 45 Centre for Local Economic Strategies Community business and anchor institutions About this report This report seeks to draw on and extend the Centre for Local Economic Strategies’ (CLES) existing work around anchor institutions and the local wealth-building movement, by developing an understanding of how anchor institutions can support community businesses to evolve and realise their local economic and social potential. Alongside a review of existing policy and literature, the report draws on primary research conducted in three localities – Liverpool, Bristol and Ipswich. The research was funded through the Power to Change Research Institute’s open research grants programme. This programme aims to support the community business sector and its partners in delivering the evidence the sector needs for its own development, and to make the case for the value of community business.
    [Show full text]
  • 1000 Companies to Inspire Britain 2015 Fm Am
    1000 1000 COMPANIES TO INSPIRE 1000 COMPANIES TO INSPIRE 2015 BRITAIN BRITAIN AM FM 2015 Media partner Our sponsors www.1000companies.com 1000 COMPANIES TO INSPIRE 2015 BRITAIN London Stock Exchange Group Editorial Board Tom Gilbert (Senior Press Officer); Ed Clark (Press Officer); Alexandra Ritterman (Junior Press Officer) Contents Wardour Led by Managing Director Claire Oldfield and Creative Director Ben Barrett Forewords 74 John Cridland CBE The team included: Art Editor Lynn Jones; Picture Researcher and Photographer Johanna Ward; Director General, Confederation Editor Hannah Stodell; Wardour editorial; Project Director Charlotte Tapp; 5 Xavier Rolet of British Industry CEO, London Stock Exchange Group Production John Faulkner and Jack Morgan 85 Kirstie Donnelly MBE 10 Tim Hinton Managing Director, City & Guilds UK Wardour, Drury House, 34–43 Russell Street, Managing Director, Mid Markets and London WC2B 5HA, United Kingdom SME Banking, Lloyds Bank 93 Tim Ward CEO, The Quoted Companies Alliance +44 (0)20 7010 0999 12 Stephen Welton www.wardour.co.uk CEO, Business Growth Fund 104 Anthony Browne CEO, British Bankers’ Association 14 Jim Durkin CEO, Cenkos 117 Tim Hames Director General, British Private Equity 16 Allister Heath and Venture Capital Association Pictures: Getty Images, iStock, Gallerystock Deputy Director of Content and Deputy Editor, Telegraph Media Group All other pictures used by permission 17 Damian Kimmelman Sections Cover illustration: Sol Linero Co-founder and CEO, DueDil 22 Technology & Digital Printed by Graphius
    [Show full text]
  • (0)20 7211 6664 4Th February 2020 Dear Dr Rössl
    Cultural Diplomacy Team 4th Floor 100 Parliament Street London SW1A 2BQ T: +44 (0)20 7211 6664 4th February 2020 Dear Dr Rössler, State of Conservation Report for the Liverpool Marine Mercantile City World Heritage Site: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland In accordance with Decision 43 COM 7A.47 we submit the following report on the state of conservation of Liverpool Marine Mercantile City World Heritage Site. This report is structured in line with the template provided in the Operational Guidelines. The relevant sections of the Committee decision are printed in italics for ease of reference. The UK State Party is content for this report to be posted on the UNESCO World Heritage Centre website. If you require further information or clarification do please do not hesitate to contact me. Kind regards, Enid Williams World Heritage Policy Advisor ONIO MU M ND RI T IA A L • P • W L STATE OF CONSERVATION REPORTS O A I R D L D N H O E M R I E T IN AG O E • PATRIM BY THE STATES PARTIES United Nations World Heritage Cultural Organization Convention (in compliance with Paragraph 169 of the Operational Guidelines) LIVERPOOL MARITIME MERCANTILE CITY (United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) (C1150) 1. Executive Summary This report addresses the issues raised by the World Heritage Committee in its Decision 43 COM 7A.47. The decision has as its focus the Liverpool Waters development scheme, part of which lies in the World Heritage Site with the remainder in the Buffer Zone. It confirms that Liverpool City Council (LCC) and Peel Holdings (the Liverpool Waters developer), with the advice of Historic England (HE) and the engagement of the State Party are working to safeguard the OUV of the property, including the conditions of authenticity and integrity and the protection and management regime.
    [Show full text]
  • Celebrating the University of Liverpool's Contribution to Liverpool
    Celebrating the University of Liverpool’s contribution to Liverpool City Region 2 | CELEBRATING THE UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL’S CONTRIBUTION TO LIVERPOOL CITY REGION | 3 Contents The University of Liverpool is a successful global organisation and an increasing city regional innovation, commercialising knowledge and anchor institution which makes a major economic and social contribution promoting thought leadership, culture and heritage. The University has to Liverpool City Region. Our strategic ambitions - to connect globally, committed to developing and deepening those principles and practices How does the University contribute to and engage with Liverpool City Region? . .................................................................................. 04 innovate, increase social mobility and work in partnership – directly even further in future by creating a Civic University Agreement with key affect the city region’s performance and prospects. So too does city regional organisations. This will allow us to do even more of this our expenditure, investment, infrastructure and people. This report work. Promoting public health and wellbeing. ............................................................................................................................................................... 06 demonstrates the different ways in which the University contributes to the success of Liverpool and the city region. It reflects on the principles Getting people into employment. ...........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • London Leads UK Cities in Economic Recovery
    Article London leads UK cities in economic recovery Following the publication of regional Gross Value Added (income approach), this article focuses on the economic performance of the largest UK cities. We compare the cities’ annual GVA growth from 2013 to 2014, and also the longer term growth since the low- point of the recent economic downturn in 2009. For each city covered we identify the industries mostly responsible for driving this change. Contact: Release date: Next release: Trevor Fenton 9 December 2015 To be announced [email protected] Table of contents 1. Introduction 2. London and Manchester 3. Other major UK cities 4. Background notes 5. Annex A: Local Authorities covered by the city areas used in this article Page 1 of 8 1. Introduction Since 2009, the low point of the UK’s recent economic downturn, London has seen the strongest growth in gross value added (GVA) of the major UK cities, increasing by 28.9% over the five years to 2014. Most other major UK cities have also shown growth over this period, though to a lesser extent. Greater Manchester increased by 15.2% from 2009 to 2014. The latest regional GVA figures published today by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) show how the economic activity in regions, counties and cities of the UK has changed between 1997 and 2014. In this article we look at the performance of some of the largest cities in the UK, defined according to the European NUTS system. Some of these areas do not match the regions that are being established for the new City Deals, as these new administrative regions are still evolving independently of existing standards.
    [Show full text]