DOCSLIB.ORG

2TI994 National Register of Historic Places ?OWAL Multiple Property Documentation Form Fiegister

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2TI994 National Register of Historic Places ?OWAL Multiple Property Documentation Form Fiegister NFS Form 10-900-b OMB No 1024-0018 (Revised March 1992) '5 fp n? rj n/7 r? United States Department of the Interior -"« v-lJ is i i W National Park Service 2TI994 National Register of Historic Places ?OWAL Multiple Property Documentation Form fiEGiSTER This form is used for documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (National Register Bulletin 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. For additional space, use continuation sheets (Form 10-9000-a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items. X New Submission Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing Apartment Buildings in Washington, D.C 1880-1945 B. Associated Historic Contexts (Name each associated historic context, identifying theme, geographical area, and chronological period for each.) Apartment Buildings (1880-1945) m Working Class Housing, Alley Dwellings, and Public Housing (1865-1950) C. Form Prepared bv _____ ______________________ name/title Emily Hotaling Big and Laura Harris Hughes Architectural Historians organization Traceries date July, 1993 street & number 5420 Western Avenue_______ telephone (301)656-5283 city or town Chew Chase_____ state Maryland zip code 20815____ D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission" meets the procedural and professional requirements setiorth m 36 CFR Part 60 and the Secretary of the Interior's Standard^ and Guidelines for /y^neoljdcv and/HistWa^res^btion. ffl/J Se/ continuation sheet for additic Signature and title of certifying official Date State or Federal agency and bureau I, hereby certify that this multiple property documentation form has been approved by the National Register as a basis for evaluating relaied properties for listing in the National Register. Signature of the Keeper of the National Register Date of Action Apartment Buildings in Washington. D.C. 1880-1945 Washington. D.C. Name of Multiple Property Listing State Table of Contents for Written Narrative Provide the following information on continuation sheets. Cite the letter and the title before each section of the narrative. Assign page numbers according to the instructions for continuation sheets in How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (National register Bulletin 16B). Fill in page numbers for each section in the space below. Page Numbers E. Statement of Historic Contexts (If more than one historic context is documented, present them in sequential order.) 1-66 F. Associated Property Types (Provide description, significance, and registration requirements.) 1-37 G. Geographical Data 1 IL Summary of Identification and Evaluation Methods 1-21 (Discuss the methods used in developing the multiple property listing.) L Major Bibliographical References 1-15 (List Major written works and primary location of additional documentation: State Historic Preservation Office, other State agency, Federal agency, local government, university, or other, specifying repository.) Primary location of additional data: E*3 State Historic Preservation Office Q Other State agency EU Federal agency d Local government O University G3 Other Name of repository: Paperwork Reduction Act Statement: This information is being collected for applications to the National Register of Historic Places to nominate properties for listing or determine eligibility for listing, to list properties, and to amend existing listings. Response to this request is required to obtain a benefit in accordance with the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.). Estimated Burden Statement: Public reporting burden for this form is estimated to average 120 hours per response including the time for reviewing instructions, gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the form. Direct comments regarding this burden estimate or any aspect of this form to the Chief, Administrative Services Division, National Park Service, P.O. Box 37127, Washington, DC 20013-7127; and the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reductions Project (1024-0018), Washington, DC 20503. NFS Form 10-900-b OMB No 1024-0018 (Revised March 1992) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section number E Page 1 E. Statement of Historic Contexts (If more than one historic context is documented, present them in sequential order.) THE HISTORIC CONTEXTS SUB-THEMES I. The Introduction of Multi-Family Buildings in the District of Columbia II. The Earliest Purpose-Built Apartment Buildings III. The Luxury Apartment House: Hotel as Home IV. The Popularization of the Apartment Building V. The Evolution of the Master Apartment Building Architect VI. The Apartment Building as a Washington Institution VII. Modernism and the Apartment Building: Times, Style, and Technology VIII. Public Housing Comes to the Nation's Capital INTRODUCTION This study focuses on the "purpose-built" apartment building, the building designed and constructed to serve as a multiple dwelling.1 Nearly 4,000 "purpose-built" apartment buildings were built in Washington, D.C., dating between 1880 and 1945. Of these, approximately 3,000 are standing today. The history of the development of the Washington apartment building is both important and engaging as the account of how a new building type is introduced, cultivated, and permanently established within an urban center, and its effect on the city. The clustering of several families under one roof is often the result of economic or political necessity. Under many circumstances the question of how to house these families is moot: the families make do, working together as an extended family, or perhaps accommodating each family unit on separate floors. But to plan for the housing of separate families as independent units who choose to be lodged within the confines of a single building is a different issue, and one that has resulted in the formation of a specific building type- the "purpose-built" apartment building. : Those buildings that were designed to serve other purposes are significant here only in how they affected the appearance and utilization of the purpose-built building, either as a part of its evolution or as a source for inspiration. NFS Form 10-900-b OMB No 1024-0018 (Revised March 1992) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section number E Page 2 Apartment living was introduced to Washington, D.C. in the 1870s with the make-shift conversion of large buildings, including institutions and single-family residences, into small self-sufficient living units. Some of these conversions included kitchens and baths, others did not. However, unlike their predecessor, the boarding house, or their corresponding form, the hotel, these revised buildings were intended to be permanent residences capable of accommodating numerous family units. Early Precedents The concept of multi-family living is recorded as early as ancient Rome, where apartment "houses" were a popular solution to urban living in the fourth century B.C. In keeping with economic principles still in force today, these multiple-family dwellings allowed lower and middle class people to live near urban centers by fitting many families into buildings that did not require much land. Over the centuries, the increase in construction of the apartment building resulted in the evolution of specific forms and floor plans as well as the establishment of relevant building codes concerning setbacks, fire-proofing, and height limits. The need for the building type was constant until the fifth'century A. D. when the fall of the Roman Empire and the resulting severe decline of the city rendered their function moot. The Renaissance saw a resurgence in the type's popularity, once again spurred by the growth of cities. As trade, wealth, and population made urban life attractive again, so was there an increase in interest in providing multi-family living arrangements. Venice, Europe's most populated sixteenth century city, boasted numerous apartment buildings, several of which still stand today. Other cities, such as Vienna and Edinburgh, also retain examples of apartment buildings from the period. In more modern times, most cities exhibited variations of the apartment building. Notably, London and Edinburgh developed individualized forms. It was the French example, however, which emerged as the most influential model of the building type for the United States. Paris, which still houses over 95 percent of its residential population in apartment buildings, has been regarded as a major center of apartment building design since the 1600s, although few of the earliest buildings remain. In the late nineteenth century, the Ecole des Beaux Arts brought new life and beauty to the form of the traditional multi-family dwelling. With Paris' development into one of Europe's premier cities in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, the apartment building continued to solve the need for abundant and economically viable housing for its burgeoning population. It was the late nineteenth-century, French apartment buildings that
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rock Creek and Potomac Parkway Near P Street, Ca
    ROCK CREEK AND ROCK CREEK'S BRIDGES Dumbarton Bridge William Howard Taft Bridge (8) Duke Ellington Bridge (9) POTOMAC PARKWAY Washington, D.C. The monumental bridges arching over Rock Creek contribute Dumbarton Bridge, at Q Street, is one of the parkway's most The William Howard Taft Bridge, built 1897-1907, is probably The current bridge at Calvert Street replaced a dramatic iron greatly to the parkway's appearance. Partially concealed by the endearing structures. It was designed by the noted architect the most notable span on the parkway. The elegant arched truss bridge built in 1891 to carry streetcars on the Rock Creek surrounding vegetation, they evoke the aqueducts and ruins Glenn Brown and completed in 1915. Its curving form structure carrying Connecticut Avenue over Rock Creek valley Railway line. When the parkway was built, it was determined m&EWAIl2 UN IIA^M1GN¥ found in romantic landscape paintings. In addition to framing compensates for the difference in alignment between the was Washington's first monumental masonry bridge. Its high that the existing bridge was unable to accommodate the rise in vistas and providing striking contrasts to the parkway's natural Washington and Georgetown segments of Q Street. cost and elaborate ornamentation earned it the nickname "The automobile traffic. The utilitarian steel structure was also features, they serve as convenient platforms for viewing the Million Dollar Bridge." In 1931 it was officially named after considered detrimental to the parkway setting. verdant parkway landscape. They also perform the utilitarian The overhanging pedestrian walkways and tall, deep arches former president William Howard Taft, who had lived nearby.
    [Show full text]
  • Woodley Park
    reservation Office ashington, DC 20002 DC Historic P 801 North Capitol Street, NE Suite 3000 W 202-442-8800 WOODLEY PARKHISTORIC DISTRICT WASHINGTON D.C. 23 WOODLEY HISTORICPARK DISTRICT estled among such landmarks as the National NCathedral, Observatory Circle, and the National Zoo is the neighborhood of Woodley Park. This residential district with a central commercial corridor maintains a strong connection to its past and conveys a sense of history through its carefully planned streets, historic architecture, and open spaces. Initially on the rural edge of the young federal city, the area that became Woodley Park remained largely undeveloped until late in the 19th century. Today, however, rowhouses have replaced agricultural fields, country estates have given way to apartment buildings, and Connecticut Avenue— Woodley Park’s primary thoroughfare—is lined with Woodley Park in winter looking northwest busy restaurants and shops. over Connecticut Avenue bridge, 1908. Library of Congress Together, Woodley Park’s mix of former country estates, semi-detached houses, apartment buildings, and row- houses comprise a distinguishable entity that has merited recognition as a National Register Historic District. The Woodley Park Historic District is bounded roughly by Cathedral Avenue to the north and east, 29th Street to the west, and Woodley Road and Connecticut Avenue to the south and southwest. The district is significant for its varied architecture, featuring the work of notable archi- tects such as George Santmyers, Albert Beers, William Allard, and Mihran Mesrobian, and for its contribution to our understanding of development patterns in Washington, DC. 1 afforded a commanding view of the buildings under construction in the nascent capital, the port at Georgetown, and the expanse of the Potomac River.
    [Show full text]
  • Active Tanks
    All Active Tanks As of 10/14/2020 Facility Id Owner Name Facility Name Street Address Tank# Substance Capacity Installed Status 5000360 ANACOSTIA REALTY EXXON S/S #2-5377 1 FLORIDA AV NE 1 Gasoline 12000 4/28/1982 Currently In LLC Use 5000360 ANACOSTIA REALTY EXXON S/S #2-5377 1 FLORIDA AV NE 2 Gasoline 8000 4/28/1982 Currently In LLC Use 5000360 ANACOSTIA REALTY EXXON S/S #2-5377 1 FLORIDA AV NE 3 Gasoline 8000 4/28/1982 Currently In LLC Use 7000592 DEPARTMENT OF DPW-FMA 6TH DISTRICT 100 42ND ST NE 5 Gasoline 10000 6/8/2000 Currently In PUBLIC WORKS FUEL SITE Use 7000592 DEPARTMENT OF DPW-FMA 6TH DISTRICT 100 42ND ST NE 6 Diesel 10000 6/8/2000 Currently In PUBLIC WORKS FUEL SITE Use 9000855 ARCHITECT OF THE RUSSEL BUILDING 100 CONSTITUTION AV NE 1 Diesel 5000 5/10/2011 Currently In CAPITOL C ST & DELAWARE AVE NE Use 2000414 DEPARTMENT OF FORRESTAL BUILDING. 1000 INDEPENDENCE AV SW 2 Diesel 6000 5/1/1998 Currently In ENERGY Use 2001135 CAPITAL PARK CAPITAL PARK 101 G ST SW 2 Heating Oil 20000 5/1/1998 Currently In APARTMENTS LTD APARTMENTS LP Use PARTNERSHIP 2000287 DC FIRE DCFD ENGINE CO. #16 1018 13TH ST NW 1 Diesel 1000 7/17/1947 Temporarily DEPARTMENT Out of Use 4000180 NATIONAL NATIONAL 102 IRVING ST NW 2 Heating Oil 10000 12/1/1997 Currently In REHABILITATION REHABILITATION Use HOSPITAL HOSPITAL 5000201 ANACOSTIA REALTY EXXON S/S #2-7582 1020 MICHIGAN AV NE 3 Gasoline 10000 5/26/1981 Currently In LLC Use 5000201 ANACOSTIA REALTY EXXON S/S #2-7582 1020 MICHIGAN AV NE 4 Gasoline 10000 5/26/1981 Currently In LLC Use 5000201 ANACOSTIA REALTY EXXON S/S #2-7582 1020 MICHIGAN AV NE 5 Gasoline 10000 5/26/1981 Currently In LLC Use 5000201 ANACOSTIA REALTY EXXON S/S #2-7582 1020 MICHIGAN AV NE 6 Diesel 10000 5/26/1981 Currently In LLC Use 2001061 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORIC PRESERVATION REVIEW BOARD Historic Landmark Case No
    HISTORIC PRESERVATION REVIEW BOARD Historic Landmark Case No. 17-10 Wardman Tower (Wardman Park Annex) and Arcade (Amendment) Wardman Tower Lobby (Interior) and Wardman Park Entrance Gates 2660 Woodley Road NW Square 2132 Lot 32; Part of Lot 850 (old Lot 25) Meeting Date: May 24, 2018 Applicant: Woodley Park Community Association Affected ANC: 3C This historic landmark application for Wardman Tower Lobby (Interior) and Wardman Park Entrance Gates is an amendment to the Wardman Tower (Wardman Park Annex) and Arcade, a Historic Landmark listed in the D.C. Inventory in 1979 and in the National Register in 1984. The already designated property includes the Wardman Tower which was constructed in 1928 as an annex to the Wardman Park Hotel, built in 1919 and no longer standing, and the Arcade, a one- story passageway also built in 1928 to connect the annex to the hotel to its west. This application proposes to amend the existing designation to include the interior lobby of Wardman Tower, and to expand the boundaries of the Historic Landmark to include the two pairs of entrance piers, built 1926, which historically flanked the semi-circular drive on Woodley Road leading to the entrance of the Wardman Park Hotel. The amended nomination of the Wardman Tower Historic Landmark for the inclusion of the lobby interiors meets D.C. Designation Criteria B and D (History and Architecture/Urbanism), and the expansion of the boundaries to include the Wardman Park Entrance Piers meets D.C. Designation Criterion D (Architecture and Urbanism). However, the application does not clearly delineate the specific limits of the interior designation of the lobby; it is therefore recommended that HPO, in conjunction with the applicants and owners, prepare a floor plan of the lobby to articulate where the lobby begins and ends as the arcade, room corridors and other spaces transition into and out of the lobby.
    [Show full text]
  • Residential Research
    RESIDENTIAL RESEARCH THE DOWNSIZING LIFESTYLE TREND TOWARDS LUXURY APARTMENT LIVING Rightsizing beyond 2020 -Page 2 Dwelling migration routes The strong demand from downsizers Rightsizing also appeals to younger -Page 3 seeking easily maintainable prime generations, and we see this at a much properties close to city centre locations earlier stage than in previous years given Buyer profile of prime apartments has been identified as one of nine global the agile, transient and global nature of -Page 4 trends being monitored over the coming our work and play. years, as identified in the Knight Frank Prime Global Forecast 2020. Apartment living allows for low Trends in prime apartments maintenance living when at home, -Page 5 When working with our clients, many tell convenience of concierge and the ability us their home is no longer required to of lock-up-and-leave when away. provide the lifestyle they once had, and Pipeline of new dwellings in prime more often, the cost to upkeep This prime trend follows a similar path to suburbs -Page 7 outweighs the surplus space once the wider market with the average new desired. house size built in 2018/19 falling 1.3% on the year before, whilst the average Owning strata titled property With this new active retiree lifestyle, they new apartment size grew by 3.2%, -Page 8 seek simplicity, and to feel the vibe from according to the Australian Bureau of living close to the action. Downsizing the Statistics (ABS) when commissioned by Case study: The cost to upkeep living areas is not part of this movement CommSec.
    [Show full text]
  • Ten Years in Washington. Life and Scenes in the National Capital, As a Woman Sees Them
    Library of Congress Ten years in Washington. Life and scenes in the National Capital, as a woman sees them Mary Clemmer Ames TEN YEARS IN WASHINGTON. LIFE AND SCENES IN THE NATIONAL CAPITAL, AS A WOMAN SEES THEM. 486 642 BY MARY CLEMMER AMES, Author of “Eirene, or a Woman's Right,” “Memorials of Alice and Phœbe Cary,” “A Woman's Letters from Washington,” “Outlines of Men, Women and Things,” etc. FULLY ILLUSTRATED WITH THIRTY FINE ENGRAVINGS, AND A PORTRAIT OF THE AUTHOR ON STEEL. LIBRARY OF CONGRESS WASHINGTON COPYRIGHT 1873 No 57802 HARTFORD, CONN.: A. D. WORTHINGTON & CO. M. A. PARKER & CO., Chicago, Ills. F. DEWING & CO., San Francisco, Cal. 1873. no. 2 F1?8 ?51 Entered according to Act of Congress in the year 1873, by A. D. WORTHINGTON & CO., In the office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington, D. C. Case Lockwood & Brainard, PRINTERS AND BINDERS, Cor. Pearl and Trumbull Sts., Hartford, Conn. Ten years in Washington. Life and scenes in the National Capital, as a woman sees them http://www.loc.gov/resource/lhbcb.28043 Library of Congress I wish to acknowledge my indebtedness, in gathering the materials of this book, to Mr. A. R. Spofford, Librarian of Congress; to Col. F. Howe; to the Chiefs of the several Government Bureaus herein described; to Mr. Colbert Lanston of the Bureau of Pensions; to Mr. Phillips, of the Bureau of Patents; and to Miss Austine Snead. M. C. A. TO Mrs. HAMILTON FISH, TO Mrs. ROSCOE CONKLING, OF NEW YORK, TWO LADIES, WHO, IN THE WORLD, ARE YET ABOVE IT,—WHO USE IT AS NOT ABUSING IT, WHO EMBELLISH LIFE WITH THE PURE GRACES OF CHRISTIAN WOMANHOOD, THESE SKETCHES OF OUR NATIONAL CAPITAL ARE SINCERELY Dedicated BY MARY CLEMMER AMES.
    [Show full text]
  • AVANT at Met Square
    january 2016 volume XVIII AVANT at met square the next generation of urban living SUSTAINED MOMENTUM The U.S. economy remains healthy, with more than 2.8 million new jobs added during the 12 months ending October 2015. U.S. homeownership continues to decline, and at 63.7% percent, hovers near historic lows. These positive trends are continuing to drive rental demand. The third quarter of 2015 was the seventh consecutive quarter of positive net unit absorption. On average, rent growth registered 5.2 percent in the major U.S. markets, and the vacancy rate was 4.3 percent, the lowest level of the current cycle. Industry analysts expect that new unit production will peak in 2016, before tapering through the end of the decade. The near term increase in new supply is expected to have only modest impacts on vacancy and rent growth. However, due to continued job growth and a steady influx of new renters, primarily millennials entering the rental market and aging baby boomers who increasingly find rental housing more attractive than homeownership, the market will continue to perform well. With these positive market forces at work, ZOM is poised for continued success in 2016. In Florida, we will complete lease-ups at Moda and Bel Air Doral in early 2016, and will begin delivering units at Monarc at Met 3, Baldwin Harbor, Delray Preserve, and Luzano. In Texas, our Tate project in Houston will also open its doors. In our Mid-Atlantic region, construction continues at Banner Hill in Baltimore, and we are working on several new projects in other Mid-Atlantic target markets.
    [Show full text]
  • 9/11 Report”), July 2, 2004, Pp
    Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page i THE 9/11 COMMISSION REPORT Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page v CONTENTS List of Illustrations and Tables ix Member List xi Staff List xiii–xiv Preface xv 1. “WE HAVE SOME PLANES” 1 1.1 Inside the Four Flights 1 1.2 Improvising a Homeland Defense 14 1.3 National Crisis Management 35 2. THE FOUNDATION OF THE NEW TERRORISM 47 2.1 A Declaration of War 47 2.2 Bin Ladin’s Appeal in the Islamic World 48 2.3 The Rise of Bin Ladin and al Qaeda (1988–1992) 55 2.4 Building an Organization, Declaring War on the United States (1992–1996) 59 2.5 Al Qaeda’s Renewal in Afghanistan (1996–1998) 63 3. COUNTERTERRORISM EVOLVES 71 3.1 From the Old Terrorism to the New: The First World Trade Center Bombing 71 3.2 Adaptation—and Nonadaptation— ...in the Law Enforcement Community 73 3.3 . and in the Federal Aviation Administration 82 3.4 . and in the Intelligence Community 86 v Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page vi 3.5 . and in the State Department and the Defense Department 93 3.6 . and in the White House 98 3.7 . and in the Congress 102 4. RESPONSES TO AL QAEDA’S INITIAL ASSAULTS 108 4.1 Before the Bombings in Kenya and Tanzania 108 4.2 Crisis:August 1998 115 4.3 Diplomacy 121 4.4 Covert Action 126 4.5 Searching for Fresh Options 134 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Americaspeaks
    AMERICASPEAKS ENGAGING CITIZEN VOICES IN GOVERNANCE Skyland Town Hall Meeting Report to the National Capital Revitalization Corporation November 13, 2004 Made Possible in part by a Grant from the Annie E. Casey Foundation Summary Report of Proceedings District residents from Wards 7 and 8 came together on Saturday, November 13 to set priorities for the redevelopment of Skyland Shopping Center. Over the course of the five hour meeting, participants listened to presentations about the redevelopment process, discussed the retail mix of the future site, considered its look and feel, and discussed how the community could best take advantage of economic opportunities created by the redevelopment. When asked to evaluate the Town Meeting, 100 percent of participants said they had learned something from their participation in the Town Meeting. Eighty-four percent of participants rated the meeting as “excellent” or “good” (49 percent rating it as “excellent”.) Ninety-one percent of participants rated the use of technology at the Town Meeting as “excellent” or “good” (82 percent rating it as “excellent). Seventy percent of participants said they were “very unsatisfied” with the mix of stores currently at Skyland. Similarly, 66 percent of participants said they were “very unsatisfied” with the physical condition of Skyland and 63 percent said they were “very unsatisfied” with the level of safety there. The heart of the meeting was a discussion of the future retail mix for the new Skyland Shopping Center. Participants first considered the kinds of stores that they would like to see in the site. After prioritizing the kinds of stores to go on the site, they identified specific brands for each of the top categories.
    [Show full text]
  • Uptown Theater Nomination
    GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE HISTORIC PRESERVATION REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION FOR HISTORIC LANDMARK OR HISTORIC DISTRICT DESIGNATION New Designation __X___ Amendment of a previous designation _____ Please summarize any amendment(s) _______________________________________________ Property Name: Uptown Theater______________________________________ If any part of the interior is being nominated, it must be specifically identified and described in the narrative statements. Address 3426 Connecticut Avenue NW Washington, DC 20008 Square and lot number(s) Square 2069, Lot 0816 Affected Advisory Neighborhood Commission 3C Date of Construction: 1936 Date of major alteration(s) _______ Architect(s) _John J. Zink Architectural style(s): Moderne Original use Theater Present use Vacant/Not in Use Property owner Circle Management Company_____________________ ____________________ Legal address of property owner 4018 Brandywine Street NW Washington, DC 20016-1844 NAME OF APPLICANT(S) DC Preservation League and Cleveland Park Historical Society ___ If the applicant is an organization, it must submit evidence that among its purposes is the promotion of historic preservation in the District of Columbia. A copy of its charter, articles of incorporation, or by-laws, setting forth such purpose, will satisfy this requirement. Address/Telephone of applicant(s) 1221 Connecticut Avenue. NW Suite 5A, Washington, DC 200036; 202-783-5144 and P.O. Box 4862 Washington, DC 20008 Name and title of authorized representative: Rebecca Miller, Executive Director, DCPL and Rick Nash, President, Board of Directors, Cleveland Park Historical Society___________________ Signature of applicant representative: ______________________________ Date: 10/29/20 Signature of applicant representative: Date: 10/29/20 Name and telephone of author of application DC Preservation League 202-783-5144; Cleveland Park Historical Society 202-237-5241 Date received ___________ H.P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 DC HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN Plan Methodology Connections to Long-Range Planning B Seeking Public Views
    2020 District of Columbia Historic Preservation Plan Preserving For Progress 1 introduction 1 Preserving for progress The district of columbia’s vision for historic preservation 2 dc history and heritage 9 People and progress A legacy of visionary plans Landmarks and milestones A succession of eras 3 preservation achievements 45 What works about preservation in dc 4 preservation challenges 55 Gathering public views Balancing growth and character Protecting neighborhoods Communicating preservation basics Leading the nation Planning for preservation Evaluating available resources 5 goals, objectives, and actions 65 Setting shared goals Sustaining our progress Preservation in context A new planning cycle Recognizing historic resources Engaging communities Improving protections Maintaining our heritage 6 implementation 79 Achieving our goals 7 resources and appendices 89 Bibliography Credits and acknowledgements introduction 1 Preserving for progress Introduction Continuing on a Path Forward A Guide for Everyone Plan Organization Now well into its third century, the District of Columbia is This plan for 2020 updates the goals established in the Preservation requires collective action. Community The 2020 plan is organized in seven chapters: fortunate in the exceptional value of its cultural, historical, District’s historic preservation plan for the four years ending organizations and volunteers foster pride in our history and and architectural heritage. This is a rich and varied legacy, in 2016. That plan introduced a new framework for planning advocate for the benefits of preservation. Schools, cultural • First, it describes a common vision, and reviews our manifested not just in the city’s majestic museums and that could be sustained through regular updates in the institutions, and a multitude of congregations maintain history and heritage — Chapters 1 and 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Rock Creek West Area Element ROCK CREEK WEST Colonial Village AREA ELEMENTS
    AREA ELEMENTS Chapter 23 Rock Creek West Area Element ROCK CREEK WEST Colonial Village AREA ELEMENTS Hawthorne Rock Barnaby Woods Creek Park ROCK CREEK EAST Chevy Chase MILITARY RD Friendship Heights Friendship Brightwood Park Heights CHAPTER 23: ROCK CREEK WEST CREEK ROCK CHAPTER 23: American University Tenleytown Park Crestwood Forest Hills MASSACHUSETTS AVE North Tenleytown-AU Van Ness Van Ness-UDC Crestwood Spring Valley NEBRASKA AVE McLean Gardens PORTER ST CLARA BARTON PKY Cleveland Park Cathedral Heights Mount Cleveland Park Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park Pleasant Battery Palisades Kemble Wesley Heights Park Woodley Park Lanier Mass. Ave. Heights Heights Woodley Park-Zoo/ Foxhall Adams Morgan Adams Crescents Woodland- Morgan Glover Park Normanstone Terr CANAL RD Kalorama Heights Burleith/ Hillandale NEAR NORTHWEST Dupont Circle Foxhall Georgetown Village West End 16TH ST K ST Connecticut Avenue/K Street Foggy Bottom NEW YORK AVE AREA ELEMENTS AREA ELEMENTS Rock Creek West Area Element CHAPTER 23: ROCK Overview 2300 he Rock Creek West Planning Area encompasses 13 square Tmiles in the northwest quadrant of the District of Columbia. The Planning Area is bounded by Rock Creek on the east, Maryland on the north/west, and the Potomac River and Whitehaven Parkway on the south. Its boundaries are shown in the Map at left. Most of this area has historically been Ward 3 although in past and present times, parts have been included in Wards 1, 2, and 4. 2300.1 Rock Creek West’s most outstanding characteristic is its stable, attractive neighborhoods. These include predominantly single family neighborhoods like Spring Valley, Forest Hills, American University Park, and Palisades; row house and garden apartment neighborhoods like Glover Park and McLean Gardens; and mixed density neighborhoods such as Woodley Park, Chevy Chase, and Cleveland Park.
    [Show full text]