An Intertextual Approach to Problems of Genre and Heroism in Statius’ Achilleid
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Appropriate Transgressions: An Intertextual Approach to Problems of Genre and Heroism in Statius’ Achilleid By Hanna Z. C. Mason A thesis submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Classics Victoria University of Wellington 2013 Abstract Statius’ second epic poem, the Achilleid, deals with a subject matter that is particularly problematic: Achilles’ early life, in which he is raised by a centaur in the wilderness and then disguises himself as a woman in order to rape the princess of Scyros. Recent scholarship has also pointed to other problematic elements, such as Achilles’ troublesome relationship with his mother or the epic’s intertextual engagement with elegiac and ‘un-epic’ poetry. This thesis extends such scholarship by analysing Statius’ use of transgression in particular. It focuses primarily upon the heroic character of Achilles and the generic program of the Achilleid as a whole. The first chapter focuses upon Achilles’ childhood and early youth as a foster child and student of the centaur Chiron. It demonstrates that the hero’s upbringing is used to emphasise his ambiguous nature in line with the Homeric Iliad, as a hero who is capable of acting appropriately, but chooses not to. Achilles’ wild and bestial nature is emphasised by its difference to the half-human character of Chiron, who might be expected to be act like an animal, but instead becomes an example of civilisation overcoming innate savagery, an example of what Achilles could have been. The second chapter discusses the ambiguities inherent in a study of transgression, in the light of Achilles’ transvestite episode on Scyros. Numerous intertextual allusions construct various sets of expected behaviours for the transvestite youth, but his failure to live up to any of them portrays him as a truly transgressive hero. In this way, he is similar to Hercules or Bacchus, whose heroism is constructed partly upon their transgressive natures and inability to conform to societal custom. In the final chapter, the study of transgression is extended to Statius’ generic program, associating the epic with elegy. Statius employs many elegiac tropes, and makes numerous allusions to the poetry of elegists such as Ovid and Propertius. In particular, elegiac poetry’s peculiar trope of constructing and emphasising boundaries in order that they may be crossed (thus making the poetry feel more transgressive) is mirrored in the Achilleid. In this way, the Achilleid’s engagement with transgression is considered to be, in part, a method for presenting an innately problematic hero to Statius’ Flavian audience in an accessible and interesting manner. To my sisters, Gemma, Kathryn, and Rhiannon, who all inspire me more than they will ever know. Contents Acknowledgements.....................................................................................................v Introduction: De componendo Achillem....................................................................1 Intertextuality in the Achilleid.........................................................................5 Summary of Chapters.......................................................................................7 Chapter One: The Nature and Education of Achilles................................................9 A Cultured Centaur........................................................................................11 Centaurs and Lapiths......................................................................................15 The Ambiguities of Thetis’ Dream................................................................20 Achilles as Apollo..........................................................................................26 Saevus Achilles...............................................................................................29 Conclusion.....................................................................................................36 Chapter Two: Layers of Transgression in Rape and Ritual.....................................38 Achilles as Diana...........................................................................................41 Maenadic Maidens of Scyros.........................................................................44 Ritual Archetypes...........................................................................................49 Bacchus, Hercules, and the Bona Dea...........................................................58 Conclusion.....................................................................................................65 Chapter Three: Elegiac Themes in the Achilleid.....................................................67 Statius’ Proem and Recusatio........................................................................70 Pudor and the Erotic Gaze.............................................................................75 Servitium Amoris............................................................................................82 Militia Amoris................................................................................................87 Conclusion.....................................................................................................90 Conclusion: An Elegiac Epic....................................................................................92 Works Cited..............................................................................................................96 iv Acknowledgements Particular thanks are due to my supervisors, Professor Art Pomeroy and Dr Mark Masterson. They each played a part in inspiring this topic several years ago, and their advice, criticism and moral support throughout my time at Victoria and especially in the past two years has improved this work to no end. I am honoured that they agreed to take me on as student. I would also like to thank my markers, Professor William J. Dominik and Dr Simon Perris, for the work that they did in assessment. While I am still very aware that this revised thesis is not perfect, it is significantly more polished thanks to the superbly detailed corrigenda and well-considered revisions that they recommended. Their efforts have also given me food for thought in my future work. Thanks are also owed to the many other lecturers, post-graduates, and former post-graduates of Victoria University’s Classics department. In particular, I would like to thank Dr Judy Deuling, Dr Peter Gainsford, Jen Oliver, Daniel Diggins, Alexandra Donnison, Christabel Marshall, and Chris de Lisle. All of these people played a role, either in editing and sanity-checking parts of this thesis, or in supporting me emotionally. I hope they can forgive my stubbornness, and know that the work they have done is greatly appreciated. Finally, thank you to my parents, and to Matthew Oswin, who deserves as much credit for the good in these pages as I do, although he never read a word. The cover image is a photograph of Poussin’s Achilles on Scyros, painted in 1656. Image source: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/75/Poussin_- _1656_-_Achilles_on_Skyros.jpg (accessed 9th April 2013). v Introduction: De componendo Achillem torpor est nostris sine te Camenis tardius sueto venit ipse Thymbrae rector et primis meus ecce metis haeret Achilles. Silv. 4.7.21-24 My muses are numb without you, the Thymbrian ruler (Apollo) himself comes slower than he is accustomed to, and behold, at the first turning posts my Achilles hesitates.1 Statius’ second epic, the Achilleid, was begun following the completion of the Thebaid, in the early-mid 90s CE. Though the first lines reveal an intention to tell the entirety of Achilles’ life (“ire per omnem... heroa velis”2 – “may you wish to go through the whole hero”, Ach. 1.4-5), upon the poet’s death in approximately 96 CE only the first book and the beginning of the second were completed. The stanza from Silvae 4.7 above may reveal something of the challenge of this project; while Statius is certainly intending to flatter his patron-addressee, Vibius Maximus, it is not difficult to see why even such an experienced poet might – hypothetically – be having problems with an Achilleid. As the subject of the Iliad, Achilles is the first great hero of the Classical literary tradition, even as his place in the mythic tradition (as the son of Peleus and one of the Greeks sacking Troy for the second time) makes him one of the last great heroes. For a poem that entirely subsumes the events of the Iliad, there is a fine line between writing in Homer’s shadow and hubristically attempting to outdo him, and Statius’ preeminence in the literary world of the late first Century only goes so far.3 Regardless of the reason for its incompletion, the portrait of Achilles’ youth that the Achilleid provides is so beautifully self-contained that it has been called “Statius’ final masterpiece.”4 Beginning in medias res, the epic tracks Achilles as he is taken by Thetis from Chiron’s cave in Thessaly, dressed in women’s clothing, and deposited among the daughters of King Lycomedes on Scyros. Attending a Bacchic religious festival supposedly off-limits to men, Achilles rapes the princess Deidamia, 1 All translations are my own. 2 I have used the text of Dilke’s 1954 edition of the Achilleid, except where I have noted otherwise. 3 Cf. Heslin (2005, xi-xii), who argues that Statius “in no way intended to compete directly with Homer.” 4 Heslin (2005), 62ff. 1 and conceives a son. He remains in women’s clothing until the arrival of