EA Heart of Texas Wind

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

EA Heart of Texas Wind Final Environmental Assessment for the Heart of Texas Wind Project Habitat Conservation Plan SWCA Project Number 34502 June 2017 SUBMITTED TO: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 10711 Burnet Road, Suite 200 Austin, Texas 78757 SUBMITTED BY: SWCA Environmental Consultants 6200 UTSA Blvd. Suite 102 San Antonio, Texas 78249 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE HEART OF TEXAS WIND PROJECT HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN Prepared for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 10711 Burnet Road, Suite 200 Austin, Texas 78757 Prepared by SWCA Environmental Consultants 6200 UTSA Blvd. Suite 102 San Antonio, Texas 78249 www.swca.com SWCA Project No. 34502 June 2017 This page intentionally left blank. CONTENTS 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................1 2. Project Background ...........................................................................................................3 2.1. Project Description ........................................................................................................................ 3 2.2. Covered Activities and Permit Term ............................................................................................ 6 3. Purpose and Need for the Proposed Federal Action ....................................................... 6 4. Alternatives Considered ....................................................................................................7 4.1. Alternative A (Preferred Alternative) ........................................................................................... 7 4.1.1. Avoidance and Minimization Measures................................................................................ 7 4.1.2. Mitigation Measures ............................................................................................................. 9 4.1.2.1. Mitigation Ratios and Amount of Mitigation .................................................................... 9 4.1.2.2. Permanent Conservation ................................................................................................... 9 4.1.3. Monitoring and Adaptive Management .............................................................................. 10 4.1.4. Reporting ............................................................................................................................. 10 4.1.5. Funding ............................................................................................................................... 10 4.1.6. Changed Circumstances ...................................................................................................... 11 4.2. Alternative B (No Action)........................................................................................................... 11 4.3. Alternatives Eliminated from Further Analysis .......................................................................... 11 4.3.1. USFWS Considered Alternatives ........................................................................................ 11 4.3.1.1. Reduced Mitigation ......................................................................................................... 11 4.3.1.2. Additional Mitigation ...................................................................................................... 12 4.3.2. Applicant Considered Alternatives ..................................................................................... 12 5. Affected Environment ...................................................................................................... 12 5.1. Project Area ................................................................................................................................ 12 5.2. Regional Environmental Setting ................................................................................................. 13 5.3. Resources Considered for Detailed Analysis .............................................................................. 13 5.3.1. Vegetation ........................................................................................................................... 14 5.3.2. General Wildlife .................................................................................................................. 16 5.3.3. Black-capped Vireo (BCVI) ............................................................................................... 16 5.3.3.1. Life History ..................................................................................................................... 17 5.3.3.2. Habitat ............................................................................................................................. 17 5.3.3.3. Abundance and Distribution ........................................................................................... 18 5.3.4. State-Protected Species ....................................................................................................... 20 5.4. Resources Not Considered for Detailed Analysis ....................................................................... 20 5.4.1. Air Quality .......................................................................................................................... 20 5.4.2. Cultural Resources .............................................................................................................. 20 5.4.3. Energy and Depletable Resource Requirements and Conservation Potential ..................... 21 5.4.4. Environmental Justice ......................................................................................................... 21 5.4.5. Farmland and Soils.............................................................................................................. 21 5.4.6. Geology ............................................................................................................................... 22 5.4.7. Land Use ............................................................................................................................. 22 5.4.8. Military Activity ................................................................................................................. 22 5.4.9. Noise ................................................................................................................................... 22 Final version: June 2017 i 5.4.10. Other Threatened, Endangered, or Candidate Species ........................................................ 23 5.4.11. Other State-Protected Species ............................................................................................. 25 5.4.12. Public Health and Safety ..................................................................................................... 26 5.4.1. Socioeconomics .................................................................................................................. 26 5.4.2. Visual and Aesthetic Resources ........................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 5.4.3. Water Resources ................................................................................................................. 26 6. Environmental Consequences ........................................................................................ 26 6.1. Analysis Framework ................................................................................................................... 26 6.2. Reasonably Foreseeable Projects ................................................................................................ 27 6.3. Summary of Potential Impacts .................................................................................................... 28 6.4. Effects Analysis .......................................................................................................................... 30 6.4.1. Vegetation Communities ..................................................................................................... 30 6.4.1.1. Alternative A (Preferred Alternative) ............................................................................. 30 6.4.1.2. Alternative B (No Action) ............................................................................................... 31 6.4.1.3. Cumulative Effects .......................................................................................................... 31 6.4.2. General Wildlife .................................................................................................................. 32 6.4.2.1. Alternative A (Preferred Alternative) ............................................................................. 34 6.4.2.2. Alternative B (No Action) ............................................................................................... 36 6.4.2.3. Cumulative Effects .......................................................................................................... 36 6.4.3. Black-capped Vireo............................................................................................................. 37 6.4.3.1. Alternative A (Preferred Alternative) ............................................................................. 37 6.4.3.2. Alternative B (No Action) ............................................................................................... 40 6.4.3.3. Cumulative Effects .......................................................................................................... 40 6.4.4. State-Protected Species ......................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Reptiles of Phil Hardberger Park
    ALAMO AREA MASTER NATURALISTS & PHIL HARDBERGER PARK CONSERVANCY REPTILES OF PHIL HARDBERGER PARK ROSEBELLY LIZARD→ REPTILE= Rosebelly Lizard (picture by author) TERRESTRIAL Fred Wills is the author of this piece. VERTEBRATE Animals with backbones (vertebrates) fall into several classes. We all recognize feathered birds and hairy mammals. But what is a reptile? An easy defini- tion of reptiles is that they are terrestrial, vertebrate animals with scales or plates covering the body. However, this definition simplifies their great diversity. WITH SCALES In Texas alone, there are four major groups of reptiles: lizards, snakes, turtles, and crocodilians (alligators). Hardberger Park is home to lizards, snakes, and turtles. OR PLATES Common lizards of the park include the Rosebelly Lizard, Texas Spiny Lizard, and Ground Skink. Common snakes of the park include the Texas Rat Snake, Rough Earth Snake, and Checkered Garter Snake. Can you name any other lizards and snakes found in the area? Hint: One lizard can change color, and PHP: one snake can produce sound. ROSEBELLY LIZARD Like many birds and mammals, reptiles are predators. Small ones like the Rosebelly Lizard and Rough Earth Snake eat invertebrate animals such as insects. TEXAS SPINY LIZARD Medium-sized snakes such as the Checkered Garter Snake often eat frogs. Larger snakes, including the Texas Rat Snake, typically eat small mammals and GROUND SKINK birds. TEXAS RAT SNAKE Where do reptiles live? The various species occupy almost all kinds of habitats, from dry prairie to moist woodland, and even wetlands and streams. Re- ROUGH EARTH SNAKE lated species often divide up the habitat through differing behaviors.
    [Show full text]
  • The Herpetofauna of Coahuila, Mexico: Composition, Distribution, and Conservation Status 1David Lazcano, 1Manuel Nevárez-De Los Reyes, 2Elí García-Padilla, 3Jerry D
    Offcial journal website: Amphibian & Reptile Conservation amphibian-reptile-conservation.org 13(2) [General Section]: 31–94 (e189). The herpetofauna of Coahuila, Mexico: composition, distribution, and conservation status 1David Lazcano, 1Manuel Nevárez-de los Reyes, 2Elí García-Padilla, 3Jerry D. Johnson, 3Vicente Mata-Silva, 3Dominic L. DeSantis, and 4,5,*Larry David Wilson 1Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Laboratorio de Herpetología, Apartado Postal 157, San Nicolás de los Garza, Nuevo León, C.P. 66450, MEXICO 2Oaxaca de Juárez, Oaxaca 68023, MEXICO 3Department of Biological Sciences, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas 79968-0500, USA 4Centro Zamorano de Biodiversidad, Escuela Agrícola Panamericana Zamorano, Departamento de Francisco Morazán, HONDURAS 51350 Pelican Court, Homestead, Florida 33035, USA Abstract.—The herpetofauna of Coahuila, Mexico, is comprised of 143 species, including 20 anurans, four caudates, 106 squamates, and 13 turtles. The number of species documented among the 10 physiographic regions recognized ranges from 38 in the Laguna de Mayrán to 91 in the Sierras y Llanuras Coahuilenses. The individual species occupy from one to 10 regions (x̄ = 3.5). The numbers of species that occupy individual regions range from 23 in the Sierras y Llanuras Coahuilenses to only one in each of three different regions. A Coeffcient of Biogeographic Resemblance (CBR) matrix indicates numbers of shared species among the 10 physiographic regions ranging from 20 between Llanuras de Coahuila y Nuevo León and Gran Sierra Plegada to 45 between Serranías del Burro and Sierras y Llanuras Coahuilenses. A similarity dendrogram based on the Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Averages (UPGMA) reveals that the Llanuras de Coahuila y Nuevo León region is most dissimilar when compared to the other nine regions in Coahuila (48.0 % similarity); all nine other regions cluster together at 57.0% and the highest similarity is 92.0% between Laguna de Mayrán and Sierra de la Paila.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Common and Current Scientific Names for North American Amphibians, Turtles, Reptiles & Crocodilians
    STANDARD COMMON AND CURRENT SCIENTIFIC NAMES FOR NORTH AMERICAN AMPHIBIANS, TURTLES, REPTILES & CROCODILIANS Sixth Edition Joseph T. Collins TraVis W. TAGGart The Center for North American Herpetology THE CEN T ER FOR NOR T H AMERI ca N HERPE T OLOGY www.cnah.org Joseph T. Collins, Director The Center for North American Herpetology 1502 Medinah Circle Lawrence, Kansas 66047 (785) 393-4757 Single copies of this publication are available gratis from The Center for North American Herpetology, 1502 Medinah Circle, Lawrence, Kansas 66047 USA; within the United States and Canada, please send a self-addressed 7x10-inch manila envelope with sufficient U.S. first class postage affixed for four ounces. Individuals outside the United States and Canada should contact CNAH via email before requesting a copy. A list of previous editions of this title is printed on the inside back cover. THE CEN T ER FOR NOR T H AMERI ca N HERPE T OLOGY BO A RD OF DIRE ct ORS Joseph T. Collins Suzanne L. Collins Kansas Biological Survey The Center for The University of Kansas North American Herpetology 2021 Constant Avenue 1502 Medinah Circle Lawrence, Kansas 66047 Lawrence, Kansas 66047 Kelly J. Irwin James L. Knight Arkansas Game & Fish South Carolina Commission State Museum 915 East Sevier Street P. O. Box 100107 Benton, Arkansas 72015 Columbia, South Carolina 29202 Walter E. Meshaka, Jr. Robert Powell Section of Zoology Department of Biology State Museum of Pennsylvania Avila University 300 North Street 11901 Wornall Road Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Kansas City, Missouri 64145 Travis W. Taggart Sternberg Museum of Natural History Fort Hays State University 3000 Sternberg Drive Hays, Kansas 67601 Front cover images of an Eastern Collared Lizard (Crotaphytus collaris) and Cajun Chorus Frog (Pseudacris fouquettei) by Suzanne L.
    [Show full text]
  • Voluntary Exposure of Some
    Zoo Biology 29 : 317–334 (2010) RESEARCH ARTICLE Voluntary Exposure of Some Western-Hemisphere Snake and Lizard Species to Ultraviolet-B Radiation in the Field: How Much Ultraviolet-B Should a Lizard or Snake Receive in Captivity? Gary W. Ferguson,1Ã Andrew M. Brinker,1 William H. Gehrmann,1 Stacey E. Bucklin,1 Frances M. Baines,2 and Steve J. Mackin3 1Department of Biology, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, Texas 2Greenfield, School Lane, Govilon, Abergavenny, Monmouthshire, Wales, United Kingdom 3Solartech Inc., Harrison Township, Michigan Studies of voluntary exposure to ultraviolet-B (UVB) radiation from the sun in the field were conducted in the southern US and Jamaica for 15 species of lizards and snakes occupying various habitats. Species were sorted into four zones of UVB exposure ranging from a median UV index of 0.35 for zone 1 to 3.1 for zone 4. Guidelines for UVB exposure in captivity of these and species occupying similar light environments are presented. Data for most species were collected during mid-day during the spring breeding season, which appeared to be the time of maximum exposure. For two species of Sceloporus studied more intensively there was significant variation of exposure among times of the day and among seasons. So, all-day studies over the entire active season are necessary to fully understand the pattern of natural exposure for a particular diurnal species. Environmental and body temperature and thermoregulation as well as UVB/ vitamin D photoregulation influences exposure to UVB. Regressions allowing the inter-conversion of readings among some meters with different detector sensitivities are presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Gonzales Project FERC Project No
    ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR HYDROPOWER LICENSE Gonzales Project FERC Project No. 2960-006 Texas Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Office of Energy Projects Division of Hydropower Licensing 888 First Street, NE Washington, D.C. 20426 October 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Application .................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose of Action and Need For Power ........................................................ 1 1.2.1 Purpose of Action ............................................................................ 1 1.2.2 Need for Power ................................................................................ 3 1.3 Statutory and Regulatory Requirements ....................................................... 3 1.3.1 Federal Power Act ........................................................................... 3 1.3.2 Clean Water Act .............................................................................. 4 1.3.3 Endangered Species Act .................................................................. 4 1.3.4 Coastal Zone Management Act ....................................................... 4 1.3.5 National Historic Preservation Act .................................................. 5 1.4 Public Review and Comment ........................................................................ 6 1.4.1 Scoping ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chihuahuan Desert National Parks Reptile and Amphibian Inventory
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Chihuahuan Desert National Parks Reptile and Amphibian Inventory Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/CHDN/NRTR—2011/489 ON THE COVER Trans-Pecos Ratsnake (Bogertophis subocularis subocularis) at Big Bend National Park, Texas. Photograph by Dave Prival. Chihuahuan Desert National Parks Reptile and Amphibian Inventory Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/CHDN/NRTR—2011/489 Authors: Dave Prival and Matt Goode School of Natural Resources University of Arizona Editors: Ann Lewis Physical Science Laboratory New Mexico State University M. Hildegard Reiser Chihuahuan Desert Inventory & Monitoring Program National Park Service September 2011 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Technical Report Series is used to disseminate results of scientific studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series provides contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Authority Over the Use of Native Amphibians and Reptiles in the United States State of the Union
    STATE OF THE UNION: Legal Authority Over the Use of Native Amphibians and Reptiles in the United States STATE OF THE UNION: Legal Authority Over the Use of Native Amphibians and Reptiles in the United States Coordinating Editors Priya Nanjappa1 and Paulette M. Conrad2 Editorial Assistants Randi Logsdon3, Cara Allen3, Brian Todd4, and Betsy Bolster3 1Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies Washington, DC 2Nevada Department of Wildlife Las Vegas, NV 3California Department of Fish and Game Sacramento, CA 4University of California-Davis Davis, CA ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS WE THANK THE FOLLOWING PARTNERS FOR FUNDING AND IN-KIND CONTRIBUTIONS RELATED TO THE DEVELOPMENT, EDITING, AND PRODUCTION OF THIS DOCUMENT: US Fish & Wildlife Service Competitive State Wildlife Grant Program funding for “Amphibian & Reptile Conservation Need” proposal, with its five primary partner states: l Missouri Department of Conservation l Nevada Department of Wildlife l California Department of Fish and Game l Georgia Department of Natural Resources l Michigan Department of Natural Resources Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies Missouri Conservation Heritage Foundation Arizona Game and Fish Department US Fish & Wildlife Service, International Affairs, International Wildlife Trade Program DJ Case & Associates Special thanks to Victor Young for his skill and assistance in graphic design for this document. 2009 Amphibian & Reptile Regulatory Summit Planning Team: Polly Conrad (Nevada Department of Wildlife), Gene Elms (Arizona Game and Fish Department), Mike Harris (Georgia Department of Natural Resources), Captain Linda Harrison (Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission), Priya Nanjappa (Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies), Matt Wagner (Texas Parks and Wildlife Department), and Captain John West (since retired, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission) Nanjappa, P.
    [Show full text]
  • Blackland Prairie
    What is a Prairie? The land you’re standing on now in North Texas is in an area called the Blackland Prairie. In the BLACKLAND past, an uninterrupted sea of waist-high grasses covered the land. When Europeans colonized PRAIRIE the area, they replaced the grasses with fields of crops, and planted trees to shelter their homes. On the prairie, naturally occurring wildfires kept trees from establishing on the prairie. Texas GUIDE TO 100 settlers started putting out these fires to protect their homes and livestock, and the landscape COMMON SPECIES changed. This booklet tells about • plants and animal species original to the Blackland Prairie • some newly introduced “invasive” species endangering original native species • where you can find these plants and animals • how you can get involved preserving the natural diversity of our area. Acknowledgements Special thanks to the sponsors of Texas Master Naturalists: Texas Parks and Wildlife http://tpwd.texas.gov/ Texas A&M Agrilife Extension http://agrilifeextension.tamu.edu/ Become involved today! Join the North Texas Master Naturalists in education, outreach, and service. Blackland Prairie Map (above) from TP&W http://public.ntmn.org/about-the-master-naturalist- program Photo on cover: Brad Criswell Purple Coneflower (Echinacea purpurea) Native Mexican Hat (Ratibida columnaris) Where can I experience perennial with cone-shaped Perennial blooms May-Oct. Red and yellow flower head and drooping sombrero shaped blooms. Found in prairies, Blackland Prairie today? purple to lavender petals on meadows and roadsides throughout TX. a single stem 2-5 feet tall. Photo: Wing-Chi Poon Following are some places you can go to discover, Popular garden plant that is find, and learn near you: easily grown.
    [Show full text]
  • Vertebrate Natural History Lab Manual John W. Bickham Michael J. Smolen Christopher R. Harrison 1997 Revision Departme
    WFSC 302: Vertebrate Natural History Lab Manual John W. Bickham Michael J. Smolen Christopher R. Harrison 1997 Revision Department of Wildlife & Fisheries Sciences Texas A&M University Spring 2009 Revision by Toby Hibbitts Acknowedgements The authors would like to acknowledge all those students and teaching assistants who have contributed to the continuing evolution of this lab manual. We would also like to thank Eduardo G. Salcedo for his excellent drawings of the fish, herps and protochordates. 1 Kingdom Animalia Phylum Hemichordata Class Enteropneusta Acorn Worms Class Pterobranchia Phylum Chordata Subphylum Urochordata Class Ascidiacea Benthic Tunicates Class Larvacea Pelagic Tunicates Class Thaliacea Salps Subphylum Cephalochordata Amphioxus Order Myxiniformes Family Myxinidae Hagfish Subphylum Vertebrata Superclass Agnatha Class Cephalaspidomorphi Order Petromyzontiformes Family Petromyzontidae Lampreys Superclass Gnathostomata Class Chondrichthyes Subclass Holocephali Order Chimaeriformes Family Chimaeridae Ratfish Subclass Elasmobranchii Order Pristiformes Family Pristidae Sawfishes Order Carcharhiniformes Family Sphyrnidae Hammerheads Order Orectolobiformes Family Ginglymostomatidae Nurse Shark Order Torpediniformes Family Torpedinidae Electric Rays Order Myliobatiformes Family Dasyatidae Stingrays Order Rajiformes Family Rajidae Skates Class Osteichthyes Subclass Sarcopterygii Order Lepidosireniformes Family Lepidosirenidae African Lungfishes Subclass Actinopterygii Order Polypteriformes Family Polypteridae Bichirs Order Acipenseriformes
    [Show full text]
  • Collection, Trade, and Regulation of Reptiles and Amphibians of the Chihuahuan Desert Ecoregion
    Collection, Trade, and Regulation of Reptiles and Amphibians of the Chihuahuan Desert Ecoregion Lee A. Fitzgerald, Charles W. Painter, Adrian Reuter, and Craig Hoover COLLECTION, TRADE, AND REGULATION OF REPTILES AND AMPHIBIANS OF THE CHIHUAHUAN DESERT ECOREGION By Lee A. Fitzgerald, Charles W. Painter, Adrian Reuter, and Craig Hoover August 2004 TRAFFIC North America World Wildlife Fund 1250 24th Street NW Washington DC 20037 Visit www.traffic.org for an electronic edition of this report, and for more information about TRAFFIC North America. © 2004 WWF. All rights reserved by World Wildlife Fund, Inc. ISBN 0-89164-170-X All material appearing in this publication is copyrighted and may be reproduced with permission. Any reproduction, in full or in part, of this publication must credit TRAFFIC North America. The views of the authors expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of the TRAFFIC Network, World Wildlife Fund (WWF), or IUCN-The World Conservation Union. The designation of geographical entities in this publication and the presentation of the material do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of TRAFFIC or its supporting organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The TRAFFIC symbol copyright and Registered Trademark ownership are held by WWF. TRAFFIC is a joint program of WWF and IUCN. Suggested citation: Fitzgerald, L.A., et al. 2004. Collection, Trade, and Regulation of Reptiles and Amphibians of the Chihuahuan Desert Ecoregion. TRAFFIC North America. Washington D.C.: World Wildlife Fund.
    [Show full text]
  • SPRING LAKE POCKET FIELD GUIDE the Flora and Fauna of Spring Lake in San Marcos, Texas
    SPRING LAKE POCKET FIELD GUIDE The flora and fauna of Spring Lake in San Marcos, Texas SPRING LAKE POCKET FIELD GUIDE The flora and fauna of Spring Lake in San Marcos, Texas Authors: Miranda Wait Sam Massey Design: Dyhanara Rios Editor: Anna Huff 1 The Meadows Center for Water and the Environment 1 | iii iv | 1 Spring Lake Pocket Field Guide 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS HE COMPLETION OF THIS FIELD GUIDE COULD NOT HAVE BEEN Tpossible without the participation and assistance of many people at The Meadows Center, especially Miranda Wait for her valuable information on species at Spring Lake, Sam Massey for his amazing photos, Dyhanara Rios for her skilled design work and Anna Huff for coordinating the project. Their contributions are sincerely appreciated and gratefully acknowledged. Furthermore, the group would like to express their deep appreciation and gratitude particularly to the following: To Cody Ackermann and Ivey Kaiser, and the REI Outdoor School for the opportunity to create this field guide through the Explore Spring Lake Connector Trail Rehabilitation Project Grant. Your ideas, input and enthusiasm were most helpful and have assisted us in making this a valuable resource for all who visit Spring Lake. To Dr. David Lemke of the Texas State University Biology Department for sharing his insightful knowledge with us and for his time in reviewing this guide to ensure its accuracy. 1 The Meadows Center for Water and the Environment 1 | v TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements v Black-Chinned Hummingbird 17 Introduction viii Golden-Fronted Woodpecker
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B. Texas Reptiles Including Those Found in Two Urban Centers and in Other States
    Appendix B. Texas reptiles including those found in two urban centers and in other states. (Courtesy of Cassandra LaFleur) Texas Reptiles Scientific Name Dallas Houston States Checklist 1. Alligator Snapping Turtle (Macrochelys temminckii) 14 2. American Alligator (Alligator mississippiensis) D 10 3. Baird's Ratsnake (Elaphe bairdi) 1 4. Black-necked Gartersnake (Thamnophis cyrtopsis) 3 5. Blacktail Rattlesnake (Crotalus molossus) 3 6. Box Turtle (Terrapene carolina) D H 30 7. Brazos River Watersnake (Nerodia harteri) 1 8. Broad-headed Skink (Plestiodon laticeps) D 21 9. Cagle's Map Turtle (Graptemys caglei) 1 10. Canyon Lizard (Sceloporus merriami) 1 11. Cat-eyed Snake (Leptodeira septentrionalis) 1 12. Central American Indigo Snake (Drymarchon corais) 1 13. Checkered Garter Snake (Thamnophis marcianus) 6 14. Chicken Turtle (Deirochelys reticularia) 12 15. Chihuahuan Hook-nosed Snake (Gyalopion canum) 3 16. Chihuahuan Nightsnake (Hypsiglena jani) 6 17. Coachwhip (Masticophis flagellum) 21 18. Coal Skink (Plestiodon anthracinus) 19 19. Common Garter Snake (Thamnophis sirtalis) D 47 20. Common Side-blotched Lizard (Uta stansburiana) 11 21. Common Watersnake (Nerodia sipedon) 34 22. Concho Watersnake (Nerodia paucimaculata) 3 23. Copperhead (Agkistrodon contortrix) D 28 24. Cottonmouth (Agkistrodon piscivorus) D 17 25. Crevice Spiny Lizard (Sceloporus poinsettii) 2 26. Dekay's Brownsnake (Storeria dekayi) 37 27. Desert Spiny Lizard (Sceloporus magister) 7 28. Diamondback Terrapin (Malaclemys terrapin) 16 29. Diamondback Water Snake (Nerodia rhombifer) D 13 30. Dunes Sagebrush Lizard (Sceloporus graciosus) 2 31. Eastern Collared Lizard (Crotaphytus collaris) 10 32. Eastern Hognose Snake (Heterodon platirhinos) 34 33. Eastern Kingsnake (Lampropeltis getula) 28 34. Eastern Massasauga (Sistrurus catenatus) 17 35.
    [Show full text]