The Importance of Indonesia's Nationalism Revitalization in the Globalization Era: a Historical Perspective

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Importance of Indonesia's Nationalism Revitalization in the Globalization Era: a Historical Perspective View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Universitas Diponegoro: Undip E-Journal System (UEJS) Portal Journal of Maritime Studies and National Integration, 2 (1), 1-15 The Importance of Indonesia’s Nationalism Revitalization in the Globalization Era: A Historical Perspective Singgih Tri Sulistiyono Department of History, Faculty of Humanities, Diponegoro University Abstract Received: This article analyze on how nationalism which is product of 11 February 2018 nineteenth century in Europe can be revitalized in facing the challenge of globalization. In Indonesian context, this issue is very Revised: urgent to be discussed considering the fact that the process of 28 June 2018 globalization tends to be confronted with the spirit of nationalism. Sometime nationalism is viewed as an obsolete tradition that should Accepted: be revitalized. But there are still many people who believe that 2 July 2018 nationalism is still indispensable in the face of an increasing wave of globalization. However nationalism must be revitalized in order to Corresponding author: be able to face the challenge of globalization. For this purpose, it is [email protected] very interesting to strengthen the spirit of nationalism by revitalizing it for improving the nation competitiveness in facing the expansion of globalization. The questions are in what ways could nationalism be revitalized in order to improve the nation competitiveness to face the global competition? In addition, the fundamental question to be asked is why does Indonesian nationalism need to be revitalized? What is wrong with Indonesian nationalism? If Indonesian nationalism can be revitalized, how is it done? Those are set of questions that will be discussed in this paper. Keywords: Nationalism; Globalization; Nationalism Revitalization; Nation Competitiveness; Historical Perspective. Introduction The title of this paper contains at the very least two immense issues which are Indonesia’s nationalism revitalization and globalization. Those issues seem not directly associated. Literally, the term ‘revitalization’ can be defined as to reactivate or to make function again something that probably has expired. In the repertoire of anthropology, the concept of revitalization refers to an intended and organized movement as a conscious attempt performed by the members of some certain communities to build a more satisfying culture that can be easily woven into innovative configuration corresponding to the demand of time. It is strongly related to the nature of culture which has an internal mechanism to self-change adjusting to the encountered challenges. Meanwhile, globalization is an international integrating process which happens due to the exchange of perspectives, products, ideas, and any other cultural aspects. Along with the development of information technology and transportation, the physical boundaries among nations become bias because they are penetrable with the advanced communication technology and global mechanism which compel every nation to open up in the global interaction. The 1 The Importance of Indonesia’s Nationalism Revitalization in the Globalization Era (Singgih Tri Sulistiyono) improvement of information technology and transparency regime has been setting up free competition especially in the field of economy with a series of rules that are considered fair.1 The matter is what is the relation between revitalization effort toward nationalism related to globalization challenge and the effort of national quality improvement? In other words, can national quality in facing globalization be reached through nationalism revitalization? In what way nationalism revitalization can be treated as media to improve the quality of Indonesia? Besides, the fundamental query which should be questioned is why does Indonesian nationalism need revitalizing? If Indonesian nationalism can be revitalized, how is it executed? How come? Those are the sets of question which will be discussed in this paper. Nation’s Actual Problem The two of the most problematic issues that are still faced by the Indonesian are dependency and inefficiency. Indonesia is still very dependent toward other nations whether it is recognized or not. It can be seen that Indonesia is still unable to fulfil its basic needs such as staple food and micro technology. This condition can change into a catastrophe if natural resources are sold out while we have not yet formed a strong structural foundation to become an independent and highly productive nation. At that time, the inability of the nation to fulfil basic human needs such as food becomes visible while in fact Indonesia has a great agriculture potential.2 This fits the first verse of Khalil Gibran’s poem: “Pity the nation that… eats bread it does not harvest, and drinks wine it does not breed”.3 Food crisis is only a little part of a bigger crisis encountered by Indonesia which is economy crisis started from the end of 1997. This crisis leads Indonesia into what is called economic decline. It was reflected by the piling state debt as well as private debt, rupiah’s irrecoverable exchange rate toward US dollar as before the crisis, and the high rate of poverty.4 The unsolved economy crisis brings another crisis, such as political crisis which at that time contributed the fall of Soeharto regime.5 In addition to that, there are also leadership crisis, heroism crisis, trust crisis and moral crisis; as illustrated by Gibran “…whose statesman is a fox, whose philosopher is a juggler, and whose art is the art of patching and mimicking”. A historian of Indonesian economics stated that in the Reformation Period, Indonesia suffered a 1Manfred B. Steger (Translator Heru Prasetia), Globalisme: Bangkitnya Ideologi Pasar (Globalism: The Rise of Market Ideology) (Yogyakarta: Lafadl, 2006), 38 – 44. 2On 15 January 2008 there was a demonstration by tempe and tofu manufacturer demanding the price of American-imported soybean is not increased. At that time, the price of soybean increased twice that the manufacturer of these product went bankrupt. See “Ribuan Perajin Tahu dan Tempe Demo di Istana” [thousands of tofu and tempe manufacturers run demonstration in the palace], in http://internasional.kompas.com /read/2008/01/14/10380239/ribuan.perajin.tahu.dan.tempe.demo.di.istana, retrieved on 9 June 2017. 3Kahlil Gibran’s poem, “Bangsa Kasihan” (Pity the Nation) in http://www.sutrisnobudiharto.net/2015/09/ puisi-kahlil-gibran-bangsa-kasihan.html, retrieved on 7 June 2017. 4Howard Handelman, The Challengse of Third World Development, 3rd edition (New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2003), 279. It has ever been predicted that in the late 2007 the amount of the state debt is approximately US$ 150 billions or about 40 percent of the total GDP US$ 364 billions. If it happens, 40 percent of annual state fund must be spent on debt interest. See”Utang Nominal Diproyeksikan Rp1.325 Triliun” (The Nominal Debt is Projected to be IDR 1.325 trillions, in http://suaramerdeka.com/ cybernews /harian/0707/11/nas4.htm, retrieved on 20th January 2014. 5Robert Cribb, Historical Atlas of Indonesia (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2000), 188. 2 Journal of Maritime Studies and National Integration, 2 (1), 1-15 total crisis.6 The recent heartbreaking phenomenon is the character damage of Indonesia reflected by many corruption acts and amoralities happening in the community. This “rotting Gambar 2 Kekerasan di Kalimantan process” will become a form of self-destruction if it is not anticipated immediately. Aside from economic crisis, Indonesia is also facing various kinds of social and political conflict. In the community level where many economic problems arise, the atmosphere of openness and freedom even nearly tend to be anarchy. This is contra productive when democracy is deflected to be “democrazy” (in the context of demos who are crazy). It can be seen from television programs which broadcasts violence scenes in particular. Sentiments caused by race, religion, and community differences often become the conflict triggers. News and information that come from uncontrolled social media usage have contributed to the birth of persecution acts. Within the respect of situation, the community leaders are sometimes unable to control society emotion even taking part in creating the anarchy situation. This is similar as what Gibran said in his poem “… pity the nation that welcomes its new leader with trumpeting, and farewells him with hooting…” Meanwhile, at the national level, many social and political conflicts are still considered as potential threats to disrupt national unity as what happened in Aceh, Maluku, Poso, West Papua, and so on. Some of the community organizations even demand for independence to detach from Republic of Indonesia. They want to establish their own nation like East Timor. The phenomena are still happening in West Papua. In addition to that, the emerging of radicalism in the name of religion also hazards the existence of Indonesia as a state. “Pity the nation that breaks into pieces and each piece thinks of itself as one nation,” said Gibran. There are indeed many efforts attempted by the government, yet they are done sporadically and not thoroughly executed. In the other time, it may explode again even become worse than before. The local community dissatisfaction toward central government frequently becomes the main reason of this problem. There is an accusation that central government improperly intervene local matters and draining out regional resources.7 Those issues escalated after Indonesia entered the era of democratization, transparency, and reformation. In this case, it can be considered that democratization is not always benefitted in a responsible way with respect to national unity. On the contrary, it is used to do things that potentially threat the unity. Therefore, the interest of national unity turns out to be an unimportant consideration. Meanwhile, the central government should realize that they observe things only from the central government point of view. They should consider the 6Jeroen Touwen, “The Economic History of Indonesia”, in http://eh.net/ encyclopedia/ article/touwen.indonesia, retrieved on 9th June 2017.
Recommended publications
  • On the Limits of Indonesia
    CHAPTER ONE On the Limits of Indonesia ON July 2, 1998, a little over a month after the resignation of Indonesia’s President Suharto, two young men climbed to the top of a water tower in the heart of Biak City and raised the Morning Star flag. Along with similar flags flown in municipalities throughout the Indonesian province of Irian Jaya, the flag raised in the capital of Biak-Numfor signaled a demand for the political independence of West Papua, an imagined nation comprising the western half of New Guinea, a resource-rich territory just short of Indonesia’s east- ernmost frontier. During the thirty-two years that Suharto held office, ruling through a combination of patronage, terror, and manufactured consent, the military had little patience for such demonstrations. The flags raised by Pap- uan separatists never flew for long; they were lowered by soldiers who shot “security disrupters” on sight.1 Undertaken at the dawn of Indonesia’s new era reformasi (era of reform), the Biak flag raising lasted for four days. By noon of the first day, a large crowd of supporters had gathered under the water tower, where they listened to speeches and prayers, and sang and danced to Papuan nationalist songs. By afternoon, their numbers had grown to the point where they were able to repulse an attack by the regency police, who stormed the site in an effort to take down the flag. Over the next three days, the protesters managed to seal off a dozen square blocks of the city, creating a small zone of West Papuan sovereignty adjoining the regency’s main market and port.
    [Show full text]
  • Decolonization of the Dutch East Indies/Indonesia
    Europeans and decolonisations Decolonization of the Dutch East Indies/Indonesia Pieter EMMER ABSTRACT Japan served as an example for the growing number of nationalists in the Dutch East Indies. In order to pacify this group, the Dutch colonial authorities instituted village councils to which Indonesians could be elected, and in 1918 even a national parliament, but the Dutch governor-general could annul its decisions. Many Dutch politicians did not take the unilateral declaration of independence of August 1945 after the ending of the Japanese occupation seriously. Because of this stubbornness, a decolonization war raged for four years. Due to pressures from Washington the Dutch government agreed to transfer the sovereignty to the nationalists in 1949 as the Americans threatened to cut off Marshall aid to the Netherlands. The Dutch part of New Guinea was excluded from the transfer, but in 1963 again with American mediation the last remaining part of the Dutch colonial empire in Asia was also transferred to Indonesian rule. A woman internee at Tjideng camp (Batavia), during the Japanese occupation, in 1945. Source : Archives nationales néerlandaises. Inscription on a wall of Purkowerto (Java), July 24th 1948. Source : Archives nationales néerlandaises. Moluccan soldiers arrive in Rotterdam with their families, on March 22nd 1951. Source : Wikipédia The Dutch attitude towards the independence movements in the Dutch East Indies Modern Indonesian nationalism was different from the earlier protest movements such as the Java War (1825-1830) and various other forms of agrarian unrest. The nationalism of the Western-educated elite no longer wanted to redress local grievances, but to unite all Indonesians in a nation independent of Dutch rule.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dutch Strategic and Operational Approach in the Indonesian War of Independence, 1945– 1949
    Scientia Militaria, South African Journal of Military Studies, Vol 46, Nr 2, 2018. doi: 10.5787/46-2-1237 THE DUTCH STRATEGIC AND OPERATIONAL APPROACH IN THE INDONESIAN WAR OF INDEPENDENCE, 1945– 1949 Leopold Scholtz1 North-West University Abstract The Indonesian War of Independence (1945–1949) and the Dutch attempt to combat the insurgency campaign by the Indonesian nationalists provides an excellent case study of how not to conduct a counter-insurgency war. In this article, it is reasoned that the Dutch security strategic objective – a smokescreen of autonomy while keeping hold of political power – was unrealistic. Their military strategic approach was very deficient. They approached the war with a conventional war mind- set, thinking that if they could merely reoccupy the whole archipelago and take the nationalist leaders prisoner, that it would guarantee victory. They also mistreated the indigenous population badly, including several mass murders and other war crimes, and ensured that the population turned against them. There was little coordination between the civilian and military authorities. Two conventional mobile operations, while conducted professionally, actually enlarged the territory to be pacified and weakened the Dutch hold on the country. By early 1949, it was clear that the Dutch had lost the war, mainly because the Dutch made a series of crucial mistakes, such as not attempting to win the hearts and minds of the local population. In addition, the implacable opposition by the United States made their war effort futile. Keywords: Indonesian War of Independence, Netherlands, insurgency, counter- insurgency, police actions, strategy, operations, tactics, Dutch army Introduction Analyses of counter-insurgency operations mostly concentrate on the well- known conflicts – the French and Americans in Vietnam, the British in Malaya and Kenya, the French in Algeria, the Portuguese in Angola and Mozambique, the Ian Smith government in Rhodesia, the South Africans in Namibia, et cetera.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the History of Indonesian Nationalism
    University of Vermont ScholarWorks @ UVM Graduate College Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 2021 Developing Identity: Exploring The History Of Indonesian Nationalism Thomas Joseph Butcher University of Vermont Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/graddis Part of the Asian History Commons, and the South and Southeast Asian Languages and Societies Commons Recommended Citation Butcher, Thomas Joseph, "Developing Identity: Exploring The History Of Indonesian Nationalism" (2021). Graduate College Dissertations and Theses. 1393. https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/graddis/1393 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at ScholarWorks @ UVM. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate College Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ UVM. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DEVELOPING IDENTITY: EXPLORING THE HISTORY OF INDONESIAN NATIONALISM A Thesis Presented by Thomas Joseph Butcher to The Faculty of the Graduate College of The University of Vermont In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Specializing in History May, 2021 Defense Date: March 26, 2021 Thesis Examination Committee: Erik Esselstrom, Ph.D., Advisor Thomas Borchert, Ph.D., Chairperson Dona Brown, Ph.D. Cynthia J. Forehand, Ph.D., Dean of the Graduate College Abstract This thesis examines the history of Indonesian nationalism over the course of the twentieth century. In this thesis, I argue that the country’s two main political leaders of the twentieth century, Presidents Sukarno (1945-1967) and Suharto (1967-1998) manipulated nationalist ideology to enhance and extend their executive powers. The thesis begins by looking at the ways that the nationalist movement originated during the final years of the Dutch East Indies colonial period.
    [Show full text]
  • “What's the Matter with Being Indonesian?”
    “What’s the matter with being Indonesian?” A Social Representation Approach to Unravel Indonesian National Identity MSc Social Research Dissertation School of Social and Political Science 2012 – 2013 Exam Number: B029071 Word Count: 14.461 1 Acknowledgement I would like to thank my supervisor, Ross Bond, since this research could not be completed without his invaluable guidance and patience. I sincerely thank the Directorate General of Higher Education (DGHE) Indonesian Ministry of Education and Culture for funding my education at the University of Edinburgh. Comments and feedback given by Rahkman Ardi, Reza Wattimena, and Charlotte Olcay have also been a tremendous help. I am also very grateful for the endless love and support given by my parents and brothers that kept me going. Finally, I would like to thank my friends and research participants who have been very helpful during this process. 2 Abstract Having announced its independence in 1945, Indonesia is still “a state in search of a nation.” Consisted of more than 300 ethnic tribes and around 600 local languages and dialects, ruthless religious, ethnic, ideology, region conflicts, and civil war have even been intensified after the New Order regime collapsed in 1998. By using Social Representation theory, online survey research involving 114 Indonesians living in the United Kingdom is used to explore these points; how Indonesian negotiate their ethnic, religious, and national identity, the historical theme and important figures in Indonesia’s history, and the connection between ethnic, religious, and national identity and attitudes towards the New Order. Research findings suggest that national and ethnic identity, as well as ethnic and religious identity, is consensual, while the relation between religious and national identity is emancipated.
    [Show full text]
  • Rewriting Indonesian History the Future in Indonesia’S Past
    No. 113 Rewriting Indonesian History The Future in Indonesia’s Past Kwa Chong Guan Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies Singapore June 2006 With Compliments This Working Paper series presents papers in a preliminary form and serves to stimulate comment and discussion. The views expressed are entirely the author’s own and not that of the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies The Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS) was established in July 1996 as an autonomous research institute within the Nanyang Technological University. Its objectives are to: • Conduct research on security, strategic and international issues. • Provide general and graduate education in strategic studies, international relations, defence management and defence technology. • Promote joint and exchange programmes with similar regional and international institutions; and organise seminars/conferences on topics salient to the strategic and policy communities of the Asia-Pacific. Constituents of IDSS include the International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR), the Centre of Excellence for National Security (CENS) and the Asian Programme for Negotiation and Conflict Management (APNCM). Research Through its Working Paper Series, IDSS Commentaries and other publications, the Institute seeks to share its research findings with the strategic studies and defence policy communities. The Institute’s researchers are also encouraged to publish their writings in refereed journals. The focus of research is on issues relating to the security and stability of the Asia-Pacific region and their implications for Singapore and other countries in the region. The Institute has also established the S. Rajaratnam Professorship in Strategic Studies (named after Singapore’s first Foreign Minister), to bring distinguished scholars to participate in the work of the Institute.
    [Show full text]
  • Nationalism and National Culture in Indonesian Art Music and Performances (1900-2018): Reflections from Postcolonial Perspectives
    Nationalism and National Culture in Indonesian Art Music and Performances (1900-2018): Reflections from Postcolonial Perspectives Aniarani Andita 5837456 MA Thesis Musicology Utrecht University First Reader/Supervisor: Dr. Floris Schuiling Second Reader: Dr. Barbara Titus 2018 ABSTRACT Partha Chatterjee (1997) affirms that the attitude to modernity in formerly-colonized societies is always deeply ambiguous, because the modernity that the colonizers used as justification for colonialism also taught the colonized societies of its values. Indonesia is not an exception; having been colonized for centuries by a European nation, Indonesian nationalism arose from the desire for freedom from the colonizer. However, this nationalism, and the subsequent attempts for the creation of national culture has have always been replete with ambivalencies—with negotiations between the need to create a distinct national identity and the values of European cultures as imposed in the colonial time. This thesis looks at the discourses of nationalism, national culture, and national music in Indonesia since the beginning of the twentieth century to the present day, and examine its manifestations in the field of Indonesian art music and its performances by Indonesian symphony orchestras. I argue that these discourses and actions have always been embedded with a legacy of colonialism in the form of xenocentrism in its broad sense: the tendency among Indonesians to continue to concern about the Western others as they try to define their own identity and culture. Moreover, through case studies such as the compositions Varia Ibukota by Mochtar Embut and Suvenir dari Minangkabau by Arya Pugala Kitti, and the practices of contemporary symphony orchestras Gita Bahana Nusantara and Jakarta City Philharmonic, I employ postcolonial theories to view those works as reflections of the entanglement between colonial history and Indonesia-specific visions, as well as as endeavours to decolonize the knowledge of European classical music and performance form.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Indonesian Wayang During
    ABSTRACT INDONESIAN WAYANG DURING THE “GUIDED DEMOCRACY,” “NEW ORDER,” AND “REFORMASI” ERAS: NEGOTIATING POLITICS, RELIGION, AND ENTERTAINMENT By Thomas Charles Nagy This paper analyzes and demonstrates the transformative character of wayang puppetry through the first three eras of Indonesian independence: the “Guided Democracy” (1945- 1965), the “New Order” (1966-1998), and the “Reformasi” (1998-c.2001). This thesis posits that wayang is a ritual and needs to be investigated in terms of its complex relationship with religion, politics, and entertainment. Specifically, during the Guided Democracy wayang was utilized as propaganda, and as the bases for an emergent Indonesian nationalism. During the New Order wayang’s role as propaganda was further institutionalized by the rules of tetekon, which served to “normalize” and regulate wayang performances. In response to the government, many dalang (puppeteers) utilized “traditional” and innovative forms of entertainment to subvert the government while preserving their integrity through valid expressions of Javanese thirdness. Finally, wayang during the Reformasi serves as the ultimate demonstration of the reality of the social tensions created by the New Order government in that Reformasi wayang was utilized as a means to freely reflect and critique the totalitarian New Order regime. INDONESIAN WAYANG DURING THE “GUIDED DEMOCRACY,” “NEW ORDER,” AND “REFORMASI” ERAS: NEGOTIATING POLITICS, RELIGION, AND ENTERTAINMENT A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Miami University in partial fulfillment
    [Show full text]
  • National Identity Or Transnational Identity
    Prosiding Simposium Internasional Jurnal ANTROPOLOGI INDONESIA I Makassar 2000 donesia, out of a population of 200 million. They are a di- National Identity or verse group which Leo Suryadinata has divided into peranakan and totok (Suryadinata 1998b). Peranakan Chi- nese are older settlers who have partly assimilated into Indo- Transnational nesian society. The totok are first- or second-generation Chi- nese. According to Suryadinata, "in the eyes of most indig- Identity: enous Indonesians, as long as the ethnic Chinese have not been completely absorbed into indigenous society, the 'Chi- Theoretical Approaches nese problem' will remain" (Suryadinata 1998b). Although the Suharto administration (1965-1998) asserted to the Ethnic Chinese that its objective was the complete assimilation of the ethnic- Chinese into indigenous society, it continued to differentiate in Indonesia between indigenous and non-indigenous groups based on descent. For example, the identity cards of the ethnic Chi- nese have special codes to distinguish them from the rest of the population; and in order to renew a passport, Chinese Indonesians must submit proof of citizenship of deceased parents, which non-Chinese Indonesians are not required to do (Cohen 2000). Since the fall of Suharto and the instigation of the government of Abdurrahman Wahid (President) and Megawati Sukarnoputri (vice-president) in 1999, there have been calls to repeal such discriminatory laws. The ethnic Chinese are becoming more involved in politics, and they are permitted to express their Chinese identity more openly than they had been during the Suharto era.1 Aims In this paper I will explore some of the debates about national and transnational identities and relate them to eth- nic Chinese Indonesians: how they perceive themselves and how they are perceived by other Indonesians.
    [Show full text]
  • THE UNITED STATES and INDONESIAN INDEPENDENCE the ROLE of AMERICAN PUBLIC OPINION by BILLY DAVID HANCOCK, B.A. a THESIS in HISTO
    THE UNITED STATES AND INDONESIAN INDEPENDENCE THE ROLE OF AMERICAN PUBLIC OPINION by BILLY DAVID HANCOCK, B.A. A THESIS IN HISTORY Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS Approved Accepted Au^st, 1973 \\^\ VJH^ Mir, I ;^3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The difficulties I have encountered in the composi­ tion of this thesis are almost as numerous as the obstacles that plagued the Indonesian nationalists in their quest for independence. I am indebted to several individuals for patience rendered for approximately two years. In particu­ lar, gratitude and appreciation are extended to Dr. James W, Harper whose guidance has contributed to a vast improvement in my writing style and research persistence. I would also like to thank Dr. Key Ray Chong as second reader, Rubynelle Powe for her invaluable typing assistance, Jim Powe for proofreading the thesis, and my wife Jessica for her encouragement and assistance. Further, I wish to thank the many members of the faculty representing the Texas Tech Department of History for the enjoyable hours of discussion and research that have culminated with this thesis. 11 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ii INTRODUCTION 1 Chapter I. THE PRE-WAR ERA 4 II. WAR AND REVOLT 24 III. THE UNITED STATES AS A MEDIATOR . 44 IV. AMERICA AND A NEW REPUBLIC 71 CONCLUSION 87 APPENDIX 95 BIBLIOGRAPHY 101 111 INTRODUCTION The United States of America played a primary role in the emergence of Indonesia as an independent nation by placing economic pressure on the Netherlands to end its colonial rule in the East Indies.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnicity, Race Modernity and Citizenship in Early Indonesian Thought
    Asian Ethnicity (2005) 6 (3): 145-160. DOI: 10.1080/14631360500226556 Constructing the Nation: Ethnicity, Race Modernity and Citizenship in Early Indonesian Thought R.E. ELSON School of History, Philosophy, Religion, and Classics, The University of Queensland Abstract This article examines the ways in which some early twentieth-century Indonesian thinkers conceptualised the state they had so recently imagined, and particularly how they attacked the vast problem of accommodating ethnic difference within the framework of that new state. Notwithstanding the highly promising beginnings of Indonesian self-appreciation in the early twentieth century and an extraordinarily successful cooptation and, as necessary, subjugation of local and regional expressions of ethnicity to the notion of a united Indonesia, there developed at the same time the new and strange concept of an ‘Indonesian race’. That concept represented a regressive reluctance to dispense completely with pre-modern notions of culture and belonging, and created a damaging feature of the understanding of Indonesian citizenship that endures to this day. Keywords: Indonesia, nationalism, nation, ethnicity, modernity, citizenship David Joel Steinberg once described the Philippines as ‘a singular and a plural place’.1 No matter how apposite his description, on the scales of singularity and plurality Indonesia must be accorded a higher rank than its near neighbour. Indonesia is a place of startling geographical diversity, its 18,000 islands spilling across vast seas from east to west. No less arresting is its ethnic and religious diversity. It was a daunting task to try to weld this difference into a single, united and purposeful state. Thus far, the attempt has been an astounding success, but one dogged by continuing contention about the nature of the new state, the principles upon which it should be based, and the nature of its citizenship.
    [Show full text]
  • Indonesia at Home and Abroad Economics, Politics and Security
    INDONESIA AT HOME AND ABROAD ECONOMICS, POLITICS AND SECURITY Edited by Christopher B Roberts, Ahmad D Habir and Leonard C Sebastian National Security College Issue Briefs Nos. 1–14, May 2014 National Security College Crawford School of Public Policy A joint initiative of the College of Commonwealth Government and Asia & the Pacific The Australian National University ABOUT THE NSC RESEARCH PROJECT ON INDONESIA This inaugural suite of papers for the National Security College Issue Brief Series is also a component of an NSC research grant investigating the prospects, challenges and opportunities associated with Indonesia’s ascent in the political-security, economic, and socio-cultural spheres. The chief investigators for this project are Dr Christopher Roberts, Dr Ahmad Habir, and Associate Professor Leonard Sebastian. These issue briefs represent a short precursor to a fi fteen chapter edited book, titled Indonesia’s Ascent: Power, Leadership and the Regional Order, to be published by Palgrave MacMillan in late 2014. The project also involved conferences and fi eldwork in both Canberra and Jakarta between 2012 and 2013. CONTENTS The historical foundations of Indonesia’s regional and global role, 1945–75 1 Sue Thompson Indonesia: The economic foundations of security 9 Satish Mishra Democratic achievement and policy paralysis: Implications for Indonesia’s continued ascent 17 Stephen Sherlock Politics, security and defence in Indonesia: Interactions and interdependencies 25 Iis Gindarsah Security fault lines: Unresolved issues and new challenges
    [Show full text]