DOCSLIB.ORG

Initial Title

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Initial Title Updated: March 9, 2001 [Next] [Previous] [Site Overview Contents] [Region 9 Waste Home] [Region 9 Home] [Superfund Home] [EPA Home] [Site Info Home] CASTLE EPA Region 9 AIR City: Atwater FORCE County: Merced BASE Other Names: CALIFORNIA EPA ID# CA3570024551 Click here for interactive site area map TABLE OF CONTENTS Click on a category below or scroll down the page. ● Site Description and History ❍ Maps ❍ Images ● Threats and Contaminants ❍ Description ❍ Environmental Data ● Cleanup Approach ❍ Response Action Status ● Environmental Progress ● Potentially Responsible Parties ● Site Documents and Reports ● Community Involvement: Public Meetings, Newsletters, and Fact Sheets ● Site Repositories/Library Sources ● Contacts ● Miscellaneous Information SITE DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY Description: The Castle Air Force Base (CAFB) site comprises 2,777 acres and is located in Atwater, California. The installation originally was used as an aircrew training facility by the Army in 1941. The Strategic Air Command assumed responsibility for the base in 1946. Since the mid-1940s, aircraft maintenance, fuel management, and fire training activities on the base have generated wastes that consist primarily of waste fuels, oils, solvents, and cleaners. Base activities also have generated lesser amounts of paints and plating wastes. The Air Force disposed bulk wastes such as solvents, oils, fuels, and sludges in pits at landfills around the base until 1977. Fuel and waste oils were incinerated by the Air Force during fire training exercises. The Air Force ceased disposal of hazardous waste on site in 1977, and the base was officially closed in 1995. Investigations have been completed or are proceeding at multiple areas of contamination including landfills, discharge areas, chemical disposal areas, fire training areas, fuel spill areas, and polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) spill areas. Approximately 6,000 people obtain their drinking water from both municipal and private wells located near the site. Site Responsibility: NPL LISTING HISTORY This site is being addressed through Federal Proposed Date: 10/15/84 actions. Final Date: 07/22/87 Deleted Date: THREATS AND CONTAMINANTS Groundwater in the shallow and subshallow aquifers in the Main Base and the North, East, and West Flightline areas is contaminated with trichloroethylene (TCE) and benzene. Additionally, groundwater underlying a residential housing area located adjacent to the southwest portion of the Base is contaminated with cis- 1,2-dichloroethylene (DCE). Soils in the Main Base, the East Sector, and the West Flightline Sectors are contaminated with volatile organic compounds (VOCs) including TCE, toluene, ethyl benzene, and xylene. Future workers and residents could be exposed to contaminants by accidentally ingesting or coming into direct contact with contaminated soil. Because groundwater is used by local farmers to irrigate crops, area residents also could be exposed to airborne concentrations of TCE in dusts, and contaminants bioaccumulated in area produce. CLEANUP APPROACH The groundwater contamination at the site is being addressed in five stages: immediate actions, one interim action concerning the shallow aquifer, and three long-term remedial phases focusing on cleanup of: 1) Disposal Area-4 and Wallace Road; 2) the off-base groundwater and sub- shallow aquifers; and 3) the entire base. The site is divided into three operable units for investigation purposes, including the Comprehensive Basewide (CB) Part 1 (Groundwater), the Source Control Operable Unit (SCOU) (Soil), and the Comprehensive Basewide Part 2 (Basewide Wrap-up). The CB Part 1 incorporates areas previously designated Operable Units 1 and 2. Removal actions have been conducted on approximately sixteen sites with soil contamination to expedite cleanup and property reuse. Response Action Status Immediate Actions: The Air Force installed two deep wells in 1988 to replace TCE contaminated water supplies: one for the City of Atwater and one to meet on-base needs. In 1989, the Air Force also built a granular activated carbon filtration system to treat TCE contaminated groundwater. Prior to the installation of these filters, the Air Force supplied area residents with bottled water. Cleanup Ongoing: The Air Force has constructed four groundwater pump-and- treat systems, including the Operable Unit 1 (OU-1), Operable Unit 2 (OU-2), Phase 2, and Castle Vista systems (completed in July 1994, November 1996, and October 1997, respectively). These systems remove chemicals from contaminated groundwater using either a granular activated carbon filtration system (OU-2, Phase 2, and Castle Vista systems) or an air stripping system (OU- 1 system). Three of the pump-and-treat systems are designed to remediate TCE in the groundwater of the Main Base Plume and one is designed to remediate cis- 1,2-DCE in the groundwater of the Castle Vista Plume. The treated groundwater from all systems is reinjected into the ground. Approximately 1,200 pounds of TCE and 26 pounds of DCE have been removed by the four systems by the four systems to date (November 1999). The cleanup of the Castle Vista Plume in particular is progressing well, although groundwater cleanup in general is a very slow process. In 1999, the Air Force was able to shut off portions of the Castle Vista pump and treat system, including two of six extraction wells and two of eight injection wells. They anticipate meeting the cleanup objectives for this plume within the next five years. Remedy Design: The Air Force will begin construction of the Phase 3 groundwater treatment system in early 2000. The effectiveness of the existing treatment systems in cleaning up the contaminated groundwater was evaluated in 1999 in the Technical and Economic Evaluation Report (TEER). The TEER concluded that expansion of the existing treatment systems was necessary to meet the cleanup objectives outlined in the Comprehensive Basewide Part 1 Record of Decision (ROD) and to expedite the groundwater remediation to reduce costs. Phase 3 will involve the installation of eight additional groundwater extraction wells and eight additional injection wells, and the expansion of the existing Phase 2 pump-and-treat plant by adding another pair of granular activated carbon vessels to remove groundwater contaminants. The Phase 3 Work Plan and Remedial Design were completed in the Fall of 1999. The Phase 3 system is scheduled to be operational by Spring 2000. Site Studies: In 1989, a study was initiated to evaluate the nature and extent of soil contamination at over 200 sites that comprise the Source Control Operable Unit (SCOU) and to determine the most effective methods for addressing the contamination. The investigation for the majority of sites was completed in 1997. The Air Force will undertake further investigation of eleven sites with low level VOC contamination during the Spring of 2000 as part of the "Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE) Decision Study." The SVE Decision Study will employ the use of a new technology to collect data and develop conceptual models of subsurface lithology and contamination for each of the eleven sites. The purpose of the study will be to determine whether contaminant levels are sufficiently high to warrant implementation of SVE, a remedial technology that removes volatile contaminants from soils, at these sites. The cleanup decisions for all SCOU sites will be documented in the two- part SCOU Record of Decision (ROD). Part 1 will address the former landfill sites and sites where no environmental cleanup is necessary; this document will be completed in early 2000 and is further discussed below. Part 2 will address the remainder of SCOU sites, many of which have been determined to pose an unacceptable risk to human health and/or the environment, and is scheduled for completion in 2002 following completion of the SVE Decision Study. Remedy Selected: The Air Force is working to finalize the Source Control Operable Unit (SCOU) Record of Decision (ROD) Part 1, which addresses 120 no further action sites (no cleanup required) and seven landfill sites. Cleanup of the landfills was initiated ahead of the ROD through removal actions conducted during 1997 through 1999. These actions are further detailed below. The ROD is expected to be final in early 2000. Cleanup Ongoing: As the investigation of individual contamination at sites continues, removal actions have been initiated several SCOU sites. The Air Force has constructed six soil vapor extraction (SVE) systems: three to remove petroleum hydrocarbons from soil at Fuel Spill 1 (February 1995) , Fuel Spill 2 (September 1995), and Fire Training Area 1 (November 1996); three to remove TCE from soil at Discharge Area 4 (August 1996), Fire Training Area 1 (November 1996), and Discharge Area 8 (January 1997); and one to remove cis-1,2-DCE from soils at Castle Vista Landfill B (September 1998). The Air Force has permanently shut down the system at Fuel Spill 1 and the site is considered closed. They also are preparing to permanently shut down the systems at Fuel Spill 2, Discharge Area 4, Discharge Area 8, and Castle Vista Landfill B. Contaminant concentrations at these sites have been reduced to levels that are sufficiently protective of human health and the environment. As of November 1999, the Air Force has removed 19 oil/water separators (OWS) and 71 underground storage tanks which previously stored fuels and industrial solvents on the Base. Petroleum contaminated soils from former tank and OWS locations were excavated and treated in an on-site land farm treatment cell. Most of the treated soils were then used for constructing the caps for the two on-site landfills, which are discussed below. Cleanup Complete: Landfills: The Air Force has completed remediation of the Base's seven landfills under removal action authority. Landfill 2 and Castle Vista Landfills A and B were excavated during Fall 1997 through Summer 1998; Landfills 1 and 3 were excavated during Summer and Fall 1999. The excavated wastes were determined to be nonhazardous and were disposed in on-site consolidation Landfills 4 and 5. Landfills 4 and 5 have been capped and will be monitored by the Air Force for a minimum of 30 years.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • KNUQ Procedures
    21224 MOFFETT FEDERAL AIRFIELD (NUQ) AIRPORT DIAGRAM AL-410 (FAA) MOUNTAIN VIEW, CALIFORNIA ATIS 124.175 283.0 CAUTION: BE ALERT TO RUNWAY CROSSING CLEARANCES. MOFFETT TOWER READBACK OF ALL RUNWAY HOLDING INSTRUCTIONS IS REQUIRED. 119.55 259.65 GND CON 37°26'N 121.85 278.95 CLNC DEL 296.75 137 DANGEROUS X 200 CARGO AREA E ° 3 . 3 14 1 L R F VA ELEV 144 5 0 . 3 4 % ° JANUARY 2020 U P ANNUAL RATE OF CHANGE 0.1° W 14 R ELEV E 4 RWY 14L-32R PCN 63 R/B/W/T D RWY 14R-32L SW-2, 07 OCT 2021 to 04 NOV 144 PCN 33 R/B/W/T . 4 x ° x x x x 0 . 4 % NE U RAMP P C 37°25'N 211 Z SW-2, 07 OCT 2021 to 04 NOV RAMP 8122 FIRE 9197 HANGAR STATION 3 X HANGAR 200 X 2 Y 200 BCN ANG 238 RAMP HANGAR WEST 1 RAMP B BASE OPS 324 TWR TRANSIENT x . 4 324 RAMP ° x . 4 x ° x FIELD ELEV ELEV 37 R A 32 31 122°03'W L 122°02'W ELEV 32 36 MOUNTAIN VIEW, CALIFORNIA AIRPORT DIAGRAM MOFFETT FEDERAL AIRFIELD (NUQ) 21224 (HOOKS2.HOOKS)21168 MOFFETT FEDERAL AIRFIELD (NUQ) HOOKS TWO DEPARTURE AL-410 (FAA) MOUNTAIN VIEW, CALIFORNIA ATIS TOP ALTITUDE: 124.175 283.0 ASSIGNED BY ATC CLNC DEL 296.75 GND CON 121.85 278.95 MOFFETT TOWER 119.55 (CTAF) 259.65 NORCAL DEP CON 120.1 290.25 MOFFETT Chan 123 NUQQUN (117.6) 141 ° SW-2, 07 OCT 2021 to 04 NOV NOTE: TACAN required.
    [Show full text]
  • PRESERVING MILITARY AVIATION HERITAGE Www
    www.castleairmuseum.org CONTRAILS FALL 2019 - PRESERVING MILITARY AVIATION HERITAGE ON APPROACH By: Joe Pruzzo, CEO The Museum has been a beehive of activity thus far in 2019 on all fronts. Our beautiful Lockheed MC-130 P Hercules Aircraft was moved from the Castle Airport Tarmac area to the Museum this past July. As you can image this was quite an undertaking! Many Museum departments, plus municipalities and utility companies were involved to facilitate this move. Personally, and on behalf of the entire Museum thank you to all who participated to make this move a resounding success! The dedication of this aircraft was held on Saturday Oct. 26, 2019. While on the subject of grounds and facilities, they have never looked better! Thank you Tim, Larry, Ed, ADM-20 Quail Decoy Missle and Brian for all of your hard work and dedication. For the first time we took our television campaign North to the Sacramento market, while pouring more into our Fresno television campaign, which resulted in an Open Cockpit Day larger than ever experienced by the Museum! Aviation Pavilion to host events, both private and community Approximately 5,000 plus in attendance on Monday, yes events, along with the prospect of having the option of hosting Monday Memorial Day May 27. I must thank our exceptional traveling, cultural exhibits for our region and beyond. Our staff and volunteers for shifting the day from Sunday to marketing and promotion campaigns have been critical in the Monday, a mere 48 hours prior due to inclement weather. We growth of Museum awareness and getting more people to are diligently working towards our long desired goal of an come be amazed!! Hope to see you soon at the Museum! HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH Moving the C130 HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HANGAR HAPPENINGS By: Jeff Heyer, Restoration Manager all has welcomed us with some better weather, and a note I started in 2003 and restoration was a lot smaller group new set of 24 UC Merced inters for the semester.
    [Show full text]
  • Merced County Regional Waste Management Authority Landfill-Gas-To-Energy Project
    Initial Study/Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration Merced County Regional Waste Management Authority Landfill-Gas-to-Energy Project June 2019 PREPARED FOR: Merced Regional Waste Management Authority Merced County Regional Waste Management Authority 7040 North Highway 59 Merced, California 95348 (209) 723-4481 Initial Study/Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Merced County Regional Waste Management Authority Landfill-Gas-to-Energy Project Prepared for: Merced Regional Waste Management Authority Merced County Regional Waste Management Authority 7040 North Highway 59 Merced, California 95348 (209) 723-4481 Contact: Jerry Lawrie, Environmental Resource Manager [email protected] Prepared By: Ascent Environmental, Inc. 455 Capitol Mall, Suite 300 Sacramento, California 95814 916/444-7301 Contact: Chris Mundhenk June 2019 18010098.02 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .......................................................................................................................................................................... iii 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Introduction and Regulatory Guidance ................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Why this Document? ....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 - Draft October 2019
    Delaware Aviation System Plan Chapter 2 - Draft October 2019 ANALYSIS OF EXISTING SYSTEM HE PURPOSE OF THIS CHAPTER IS TO provide the necessary database for subsequent phases of the System Plan. Pertinent data, regarding each airport/heliport and the area it serves was T collected from each airport and the appropriate State and local agencies. In addition to the data provided by these sources, information published by the Federal government and other sources required for comprehensive understanding of the existing aviation system was collected, tabulated, and reviewed. Maximum use was made of the existing system planning work, various existing airport master plans, and environmental studies that have been completed. From these data, the analysis of the existing system was developed. Inventory items included: Airport and Heliport Facilities Aeronautical Activity Fuel Sales by Airport Land Use Around System Airports Socioeconomic Base Statutes and Regulations Future Technology Of these items, the examination of State Aviation Regulations was used to determine whether an update is needed to accommodate funding for private airport development. 1. AIRPORT AND HELIPORT FACILITIES HE FACILITY INVENTORY RECORDS OF DELDOT (WHICH are used for the FAA Form 5010), were used as T one source of inventory data for airport and heliport facilities. Figure 2‐1 presents a map of Delaware showing the locations of each of the existing public‐use airports and heliports. Additional data and information were obtained through review of existing completed airport master plans, and those that are in progress. In addition to the data from published records, on‐site inspections of some of the system airports were necessary to inspect runway and taxiway pavement conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation in California: Benefits to Our Economy and Way of Life
    Aviation in California: Benefits to Our Economy and Way of Life JUNE 2003 PUBLIC USE AIRPORTS BY FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION Commercial/Primary (29) Metropolitan (20) Regional (66) Community (102) Limited Use (33) Joint Use — Military/Commercial (2) The contents of this report reflect the views of the author who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the State of California or the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. This report was prepared with funds from a grant provided by the United States Government (80%) and funds from the State of California (20%). Aviation in California: Benefits to Our Economy and Way of Life FINAL REPORT Prepared for BUSINESS,TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF AERONAUTICS Submitted by Economics Research Associates JUNE 2003 ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY ADVISORY COMMITTEE Nancy Benjamin Alan R. Tubbs Study Project Manager District Field Services Manager California Department of Transportation Airborne Express, Mather Field Division of Aeronautics Chuck Oldham R. Austin Wiswell Robert Chung Chief California Transportation Commission California Department of Transportation Division of Aeronautics Carl Williams Senior Policy Director Michael Armstrong California Space Authority, Inc. (CSA) Senior Lead Planner Southern California Association of Governments Bonnie Cornwall (SCAG) Program Manager Division
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 CASTLE AIR MUSEUM BOARD of DIRECTORS OFFICERS: Chairman
    CONTRAILSwww.castleairmuseum.org WINTER 2019 - PRESERVING MILITARY AVIATION HERITAGE ON APPROACH By: Joe Pruzzo, CEO he time for Holiday cheer is once again here, I must in 2018, which make such an immense difference! admit in what seems to be in a blink of an eye! To me I view this in terms of the Museum having so many good Christmas came early for the Museum this year with a special T delivery in the form of a Lockheed MC-130 P Hercules Search and positive achievements that we simply lost track of time in th 2018. I feel blessed to lead such a wonderful team of talented and Rescue Aircraft from the 129 Air Rescue Wing. This staff, and volunteers that move the Museum forward. All of particular aircraft has significant historical provenance as it this of course takes funding to sustain this historic treasure. led the raid on the Son Tay Prison in November 1970 in North We sometimes feel we run a small city with various Vietnam to liberate American POWs. We plan on getting this departments, all with one common goal. To propel us forward aircraft moved from the Castle Airport Ramp over to the and continue “to preserve military aviation heritage for future Museum hopefully by the end of January 2019. generations.” With a vision to acquire, preserve, and educate. Wishing everyone a Merry Christmas and Happy New Year. I would also like to pause, reflect, and thank all of the generous We look forward to each of you visiting the Museum in 2019! donors who have donated monetarily and with needed product HANGAR HAPPENINGS By: Jeff Heyer ince our last update we have had a great group of 21 UC for welcoming and teaching our intern partners.
    [Show full text]
  • National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS) (2011-2015)
    NPIAS 2011-2015 Illustrated by GRA, Incorporated Federal Aviation Administration U.S. Department of Transportation National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS) (2011-2015) Report of the Secretary of Transportation to the United States Congress Pursuant to Section 47103 of Title 49, United States Code The NPIAS 2011-2015 report is available online at http://www.faa.gov/airports/planning_capacity/npias/reports Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................. VI Development Estimates .......................................................................................................... vii Estimates by Airport Type......................................................................................... viii Estimates by Type of Development...............................................................................x Status of the Industry .............................................................................................................. xii CHAPTER 1: SYSTEM COMPOSITION.......................................................................................1 Overview....................................................................................................................................1 U.S. Department of Transportation................................................................................2 Federal Aviation Administration ...................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 10 -- Noise Chapter 10--Noise
    Chapter 10 -- Noise Chapter 10--Noise 10.1 Introduction.................................................................................................................................10-1 10.1.1 Scope of the Noise Element...........................................................................................10-1 10.1.2 Existing Noise Environment..........................................................................................10-1 10.1.3 Noise Sources & Noise Abatement Techniques ............................................................10-5 10.2 Major Sources of Noise in the City of Merced ...........................................................................10-6 10.2.1 Vehicular Noise.............................................................................................................10-6 10.2.2 Rail Traffic Noise ........................................................................................................10-13 10.2.3 Aircraft Noise..............................................................................................................10-19 10.2.4 Other Sources of Noise ................................................................................................10-23 10.3 Noise Goals, Policies and Actions ............................................................................................10-31 10.4 Technical Data..........................................................................................................................10-38 10.4.1 Basic Characteristics of Noise .....................................................................................10-38
    [Show full text]
  • Record of Decision (Rods)
    EPA 541-R97-134 1997 EPA Superfund Record of Decision: Castle Air Force Base (6 Areas) OU 5 Merced, CA 05/21/1997 <IMG 971340> <IMG 97134A> Final Record of Decision Comprehensive Basewide Program-Part 1 (Groundwater) Castle Air Force Base 31 January 1997 FINAL RECORD OF DECISION COMPREHENSIVE BASEWIDE PROGRAM-PART 1 (GROUNDWATER) CASTLE AIR FORCE BASE TABLE OF CONTENTS Tab Section/Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION . 1-1 2.0 DECLARATION FOR THE RECORD OF DECISION . 2-1 2.1 SITE NAME AND LOCATION . 2-1 2.2 STATEMENT OF BASIS AND PURPOSE . 2-1 2.3 ASSESSMENT OF THE SITE . 2-2 2.4 DESCRIPTION OF THE REMEDY. 2-2 2.4.1 Selected Remedy: Main Base Plume . 2-3 2.4.2 Selected Remedy: East Base Plume . 2-4 2.4.3 Selected Remedy: Castle Vista Plume. 2-5 2.4.4 Selected Remedy: Other Plumes. 2-5 2.5 STATUTORY DETERMINATIONS . 2-6 2.6 SIGNATURES FOR LEAD AND SUPPORT AGENCIES . 2-6 3.0 DECISION SUMMARY . 3-1 3.1 SITE NAME, LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION. 3-1 3.1.1 Site Name and Location. 3-1 3.1.2 Land and Water Use. 3-1 3.1.3 Regional Topography . 3-1 3.1.4 Geology/Hydrology . 3-2 3.2 SITE HISTORY AND ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES. 3-6 3.3 HIGHLIGHTS OF COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT. 3-9 3.4 SCOPE AND ROLE COMPREHENSIVE BASEWIDE-PART 1 . .3-10 3.5 NATURE AND EXTENT OF GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION . .3-11 3.5.1 Shallow Hydrostratigraphic Zone (HSZ) . .3-12 3.5.2 Upper Subshallow HSZ.
    [Show full text]
  • New Castle Airport Business Plan November 2007
    New Castle Airport (ILG) Business Plan 2008-2012 Version 10.2 November 2007 New Castle Airport Business plan November 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 Timetable and Trigger Points .......................................................................6 SECTION 2: STATEMENT AND PURPOSE 2.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................8 2.2 Report Outline ..............................................................................................9 SECTION 3: BACKGROUND 3.1 Ownership ..................................................................................................10 3.2 Facilities Overview ....................................................................................11 3.3 Airport Layout Plan ...................................................................................13 3.4 Subdivision Plan for Airport Development ...............................................13 3.5 Capital Improvement Plan .........................................................................14 SECTION 4: AIRPORT CHARACTERISTICS 4.1 Existing ......................................................................................................16 4.2 Future .......................................................................................................23 SECTION 5: MARKET ANALYSIS 5.1 Market Summary .......................................................................................24 5.2 New Castle Airport SWOT ........................................................................29
    [Show full text]
  • Gustine Municipal Airport Master Plan
    MASTER PLAN k ARIES CONSULTANTS LTD. AUGUST 1999 TABLE OF CONTFENTS 1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY Introduction ......................................... Findings and Recommendations ........................... Summary........................................... 2 AVIATION ACTIVITY FORECASTS Definition Of The Air Trade Area ......................... Population and Economy ................................ Population......................................... Economic Characteristics .............................. General Aviation Trends ............................... Overall Trends in General Aviation ...................... Federal Aviation Administration Aviation Forecasts -- Fiscal Years 1994-2005 .............................. Historical Air Traffic Activity ........................... BasedAircraft ...................................... Aircraft Operations ................................... Aviation Activity Forecasts .............................. General Assumptions ................................. Based Aircraft ...................................... Aircraft Operations .................................. Recent Aviation Forecasts for Gustine Municipal Axport ......... National Plan of Integrated Au-port Systems ................. The California Aviation System Plan Update ................ 3 EXISTING AIRPORT FACILITIES AND CONDITIONS Airfield ............................................ Runway .......................................... Taxiways ......................................... Pavement Strength ..................................
    [Show full text]
  • Usaf & Ussf Installations
    2021 ALMANAC USAF & USSF INSTALLATIONS William Lewis/USAF William A B-52 Stratofortress bomber aircraft assigned to the 340th Weapons Squadron at Barksdale Air Force Base, La., takes off during a U.S. Air Force Weapons School Integration exercise at Nellis Air Force Base, Nev., June 2. Domestic Installations duty USAF: enlisted, 1,517; officer, 1501. Own- command: USSF. Unit/mission: 13th SWS ing command: AETC. Unit/mission: 42nd (USSF), 213th SWS (ANG), missile warning. Bases owned, operated by, or hosting substantial ABW (AETC), support; 908th AW (AFRC), History: Dates from 1961. Department of the Air Force activities. Bases marked air mobility operations; Air Force Historical “USSF” were part of the former Air Force Space com- Research Agency (USAF), historical docu- Eielson AFB, Alaska 99702. Nearest city: mand and may not ultimately transfer to the Space mentation, research; Air University (AETC); Fairbanks. Phone: 907-377-1110. Acres: 24,919. Force. For sources and definitions, see p. 121. Hq. Civil Air Patrol (USAF), management; Total Force: civilian, 685; military, 3,227. Active- Active Reserve Guard Range USSF States Hq. Air Force Judge Advocate General Corps duty USAF: enlisted, 2,286; officer, 232. Owning (USAF), management; PEO-Business and command: PACAF. Unit/mission: 168th ARW UNITEDUnited STATES States Enterprise Systems (AFMC), acquisition. (ANG), air mobility operations; 354th FW (PA- History: Activated 1918 at the site of the CAF), aggressor force, fighter, Red Flag-Alaska AlabamaALABAMA Wright brothers’ flight school. Named for 2nd operations, Joint Pacific Alaska Range Complex Lt. William C. Maxwell, killed in air accident support; Arctic Survival School (AETC), training.
    [Show full text]