COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT ASSURANCES 56 (2016-2017)

SIXTEENTH LOK SABHA

FIFTY-SIXTH REPORT

REVIEW OF PENDING ASSURANCES PERTAINING TO THE MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT

Presented to Lok Sabha on 11 April, 2017

LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI

April, 2017/Chaitra, 1939 (Saka) FIFTY-SIXTH REPORT

COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT ASSURANCES (2016-2017)

(SIXTEENTH LOK SABHA)

REVIEW OF PENDING ASSURANCES PERTAINING TO THE MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT

(Presented to Lok Sabha on 11 April, 2017)

LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI April, 2017/Chaitra, 1939 (Saka) CGA No. 306

Price: ` 256.00

© 2017 BY LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT Published under Rule 382 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha (Fifteenth Edition) and Printed by the General Manager, Government of India Press, Minto Road, New Delhi-110 002. CONTENTS

PAGE

COMPOSITION OF THE COMMITTEE (2016-2017) ...... (v)

COMPOSITION OF THE COMMITTEE (2015-2016) ...... (vii)

INTRODUCTION ...... (ix)

REPORT I. Introductory...... 1 II. Review of Pending Assurances pertaining to the Ministry of Urban Development ...... 5 III. Implementation Reports ...... 10

APPENDICES I. USQ No. 3854 dated 04.09.2012 regarding ‘Mithi River Development Project’ ...... 12 II. USQ No. 3527 dated 12.02.2014 regarding ‘Revival of GISO’ .... 13 III. USQ No. 147 dated 09.07.2014 regarding ‘Training to Transport Professionals’ ...... 14 IV. USQ No. 254 dated 09.07.2014 regarding ‘Monorail Projects’ .... 16 V. USQ No. 1902 dated 23.07.2014 regarding ‘Irregularities in Metro Rail Project’ ...... 18 VI. USQ No. 4005 dated 06.08.2014 regarding ‘National Academy of Public Works’ ...... 19 VII. USQ No. 2777 dated 10.12.2014 regarding ‘Construction of Flats’ ...... 20 VIII. USQ No. 2785 dated 10.12.2014 regarding ‘Transparency in CPWD’ ...... 21 IX. USQ No. 2810 dated 10.12.2014 regarding ‘Excess Staff in DDA’ ...... 22 X. USQ No. 2990 dated 10.12.2014 regarding ‘Sewerage Treatment System’ ...... 23 XI. General Discussion Dated 16.12.2014 (Supplementary by Dr. Harsh Vardan, MP) regarding ‘National Capital Territory of Delhi Laws (Special Provisions) Second (Amendment) Bill’ .... 24

(i) (ii)

PAGE XII. General Discussion dated 16.12.2014 (Supplementary by Prof. Saugata Roy, MP) regarding ‘National Capital Territory of Delhi Laws (Special Provisions) Second (Amendment) Bill’ .... 34 XIII. USQ No. 3980 dated 17.12.2014 regarding ‘Government Department at One Place’ ...... 44 XIV. USQ No. 255 dated 25.02.2015 regarding ‘Land on Lease to Hotels’ ...... 45 XV. USQ No. 374 dated 25.02.2015 regarding ‘Incomplete JNNURM Projects’ ...... 48 XVI. USQ No. 459 dated 25.02.2015 regarding ‘Common Secretariat ’ ...... 106 XVII. SQ No. 121 dated 04.03.2015 (Supplementary by Shri Ravneet Singh, MP) regarding ‘Utilisation of Funds for Urban Development’ ...... 107 XVIII. SQ No. 121 dated 04.03.2015 (Supplementary by Shri Ravneet Singh, MP) regarding ‘Utilisation of Funds for Urban Development’ ...... 117 XIX. SQ No. 121 dated 04.03.2015 (Supplementary by Shri Vinod Kumar Boianapalli, MP) regarding ‘Utilisation of Funds for Urban Development’ ...... 126 XX. SQ No. 121 dated 04.03.2015 (Supplementary by Prof. Saugata Roy, MP) regarding ‘Utilisation of Funds for Urban Development’ ...... 135 XXI. SQ No. 125 dated 04.03.2015 (Supplementary by Shri Prahlad Singh Patel, MP) regarding ‘PPP for Infrastructure Development’ ...... 153 XXII USQ No. 1469 dated 04.03.2015 regarding ‘Housing Societies in Delhi’ ...... 165 XXIII. USQ No. 2369 dated 11.03.2015 regarding ‘Reconstruction of Bungalows’ ...... 167 XXIV. USQ No. 2489 dated 11.03.2015 regarding ‘Quota for Women in Urban Local Bodies’ ...... 168 XXV. USQ No. 3517 dated 18.03.2015 regarding ‘Winding up of Directorate of Printing’ ...... 169 XXVI. SQ No. 403 dated 22.04.2015 (Supplementary by Shri Sukhbir Singh Jaunpuria, MP) regarding ‘Swachh Bharat Mission ’ .... 170 XXVII. SQ No. 403 dated 22.04.2015 (Supplementary by Prof. Saugata Roy, MP) regarding ‘Swachh Bharat Mission ’ ...... 181 (iii)

PAGE

XXVIII. USQ No. 4819 dated 22.04.2015 regarding ‘Illegal Occupation of Government Properties’ ...... 192 XXIX. USQ No. 6641 dated 06.05.2015 regarding ‘Land for Netaji Memorial’ ...... 193 XXX. USQ No. 4129 dated 23.12.2015 regarding ‘Memorial of Netaji’ ...... 194 XXXI. Extracts from Manual of Practice and Procedure in the Government of India, Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs, New Delhi...... 195

ANNEXURES I. Minutes of the Sitting of the Committee (2015-2016) held on 09.08.2016 ...... 199 II. Minutes of the Sitting of the Committee (2016-2017) held on 06.04.2017 ...... 209 III. Statement of Pending Assurances of the Ministry of Urban Development (From 11th Session of 15th Lok Sabha to 4th Session of 16th Lok Sabha) ...... 211 COMPOSITION OF THE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT ASSURANCES* (2016-2017)

Dr. Ramesh Pokhriyal "Nishank" — Chairperson

MEMBERS 2. Shri Rajendra Agrawal

3. Vacant@ 4. Shri Anto Antony 5. Shri Tariq Anwar 6. Prof. (Dr.) Sugata Bose 7. Shri Naranbhai Bhikhabhai Kachhadiya 8. Shri Bahadur Singh Koli 9. Shri Prahlad Singh Patel 10. Shri A.T. Nana Patil 11. Shri C.R. Patil 12. Shri Sunil Kumar Singh 13. Shri Taslimuddin 14. Shri K.C. Venugopal 15. Shri S.R. Vijay Kumar

SECRETARIAT 1. Shri R.S. Kambo — Additional Secretary 2. Shri P.C. Tripathy — Director 3. Shri S.L. Singh — Deputy Secretary

* The Committee was constituted w.e.f. 01 September, 2016 Vide Para No. 4075 of Lok Sabha Bulletin Part-II, dated 05 September, 2016. @ Shri E. Ahamed passed away on 01 February, 2017.

(v) COMPOSITION OF THE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT ASSURANCES* (2015-2016)

Dr. Ramesh Pokhriyal "Nishank" — Chairperson

MEMBERS 2. Shri Rajendra Agrawal 3. Shri E. Ahamed 4. Shri Anto Antony 5. Shri Tariq Anwar 6. Prof. (Dr.) Sugata Bose 7. Shri Naranbhai Bhikhabhai Kachhadiya 8. Shri Bahadur Singh Koli 9. Shri Prahlad Singh Patel 10. Shri A.T. Nana Patil 11. Shri C.R. Patil 12. Shri Sunil Kumar Singh 13. Shri Taslimuddin 14. Shri K.C. Venugopal 15. Shri S.R. Vijay Kumar

SECRETARIAT 1. Shri R.S. Kambo — Additional Secretary 2. Shri J.M. Baisakh — Director 3. Shri S.L. Singh — Deputy Secretary

* The Committee was constituted w.e.f. 01 September, 2015 Vide Para No. 2348 of Lok Sabha Bulletin Part-II, dated 31 August, 2015.

(vii) INTRODUCTION I, the Chairperson of the Committee on Government Assurances (2016-2017), having been authorized by the Committee to submit the Report on their behalf, present this Fifty Sixth Report (16th Lok Sabha) of the Committee on Government Assurances. 2. The Committee (2015-2016) at their sitting held on 09 August, 2016 took oral evidence of the representatives of the Ministry of Urban Development regarding pending Assurances from the 11th Session of 15th Lok Sabha to the 4th Session of the 16th Lok Sabha. 3. At their sitting held on 06 April, 2017 the Committee (2016-2017) considered and adopted their Fifty Sixth Report. 4. The Minutes of the aforesaid sitting of the Committee form part of this Report. 5. For facility of reference and convenience, the Observations and Recommendations of the Committee have been printed in bold letters in the body of the Report.

NEW DELHI; DR. RAMESH POKHRIYAL "NISHANK", 07 April, 2017 Chairperson, 17 Chaitra, 1939 (Saka) Committee on Government Assurances.

(ix) REPORT

I. Introductory

The Committee on Government Assurances scrutinize the Assurances, promises, undertakings etc. given by the Ministers from time to time on the floor of the House and report to the extent to which such Assurances, promises, undertakings etc. have been implemented. Once an Assurance has been given on the floor of the House, the same is required to be implemented within three months. The Ministries/Departments of the Government of India are under obligation to seek extension of time, if they are unable to fulfil the Assurance within the prescribed periods of three months. Where a Ministry/Department are unable to implement an Assurance, that Ministry/Department are required to move the Committee for dropping it. The Committee consider such requests and approve dropping, if they are convinced that the grounds cited are justified. The Committee also examine whether the implementation of Assurances has taken place within the minimum time necessary for the purpose and the Committee also look into the extent to which the Assurances have been implemented.

2. The Committee on Government Assurances (2009-2010) took a policy decision to call the representatives of the various Ministries/Departments of the Government of India, in a phased manner, to review the pending Assurances, examine the reasons for pendency and analyze the operation of the system prescribed in the Ministries/Departments for dealing with Assurances. The Committee also decided to consider the quality of Assurances implemented by the Government.

3. The Committee on Government Assurances (2014-2015) decided to follow the well established and time tested procedure of calling the representatives of the Ministries/Departments of the Government of India, in a phased manner and review the pending Assurances. The Committee took a step further for expeditious implementation of pending Assurances and decided to call the representatives of the Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs also as all the Assurances are implemented through them.

4. In pursuance of the ibid decision, the Committee on Government Assurances (2015-2016) called the representatives of the Ministry of Urban Development and the Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs to render clarification with regard to delay in implementation of Assurances given during the period from the 11th Session of the 15th Lok Sabha to the 4th Session of the 16th Lok Sabha. 2

The Committee examined the following 30 Assurances at their sitting held on 09 August, 2016:—

Sl.No. SQ/USQ No. dated Subject 1. USQ No. 3854 Mithi River Development Project dated 04.09.2012 (Appendix - I) 2. USQ No. 3527 Revival of GISO dated 12.02.2014 (Appendix - II) 3. USQ No.147 Training to Transport Professionals dated 09.07.2014 (Appendix - III) 4. USQ No. 254 Monorail Projects dated 09.07.2014 (Appendix - IV) 5. USQ No.1902 Irregularities in Metro Rail Project dated 23.07.2014 (Appendix - V) 6. USQ No.4005 National Academy of Public Works dated 06.08.2014 (Appendix - VI) 7. USQ No.2777 Construction of Flats dated 10.12.2014 (Appendix - VII) 8. USQ No. 2785 Transparency in CPWD dated 10.12.2014 (Appendix - VIII) 9. USQ No. 2810 Excess Staff in DDA dated 10.12.2014 (Appendix - IX) 10. USQ No. 2990 Sewerage Treatment System dated 10.12.2014 (Appendix - X) 11. General Discussion National Capital Territory of Delhi Laws dated 16.12.2014 (Special Provisions) Second (Supplementary by Dr. Harsh (Amendment) Bill Vardhan, M.P.) (Appendix - XI) 12. General Discussion National Capital Territory of Delhi Laws dated 16.12.2014 (Special Provisions) Second (Supplementary by (Amendment) Bill Prof. Saugata Roy, M.P.) (Appendix - XII) 13. USQ No. 3980 Government Departments at One Place dated 17.12.2014 (Appendix - XIII) 14. USQ No. 255 Land on Lease to Hotels dated 25.02.2015 (Appendix - XIV) 15. USQ No. 374 Incomplete JNNURM Projects dated 25.02.2015 (Appendix - XV) 16. USQ No. 459 Common Secretariat dated 25.02.2015 (Appendix - XVI) 3

Sl.No. SQ/USQ No. dated Subject 17. SQ No.121 Utilisation of Funds for Urban dated 04.03.2015 Development (Supplementary by (Appendix - XVII) Shri Ravneet Singh, M.P.) 18. SQ No.121 Utilisation of Funds for Urban dated 04.03.2015 Development (Supplementary by (Appendix - XVIII) Shri Ravneet Singh, M.P.) 19. SQ No.121 Utilisation of Funds for Urban dated 04.03.2015 Development (Supplementary by Shri Vinod (Appendix - XIX) Kumar Boianapalli, M.P.) 20. SQ No.121 Utilisation of Funds for Urban dated 04.03.2015 Development (Supplementary by (Appendix - XX) Prof. Saugata Roy, M.P.) 21. SQ No.125 PPP for Infrastructure Development dated 04.03.2015 (Appendix - XXI) (Supplementary by Shri Prahlad Singh Patel, M.P.) 22. USQ No.1469 Housing Societies in Delhi dated 04.03.2015 (Appendix - XXII) 23. USQ No.2369 Reconstruction of Bungalows dated 11.03.2015 (Appendix - XXIII) 24. USQ No.2489 Quota for Women in Urban Local Bodies dated 11.03.2015 (Appendix - XXIV) 25. USQ No.3517 Winding up of Directorate of Printing dated 18.03.2015 (Appendix - XXV) 26. SQ No.403 Swachh Bharat Mission dated 22.04.2015 (Appendix - XXVI) (Supplementary by Shri Sukhbir Singh Jaunpuria, M.P.) 27. SQ No.403 Swachh Bharat Mission dated 22.04.2015 (Appendix - XXVII) (Supplementary by Prof. Saugata Roy, M.P.) 28. USQ No.4819 Illegal Occupation of Government dated 22.04.2015 Properties (Appendix - XXVIII) 4

Sl.No. SQ/USQ No. dated Subject 29. USQ No.6641 Land for Netaji Memorial dated 06.05.2015 (Appendix - XXIX) 30. USQ No.4129 Memorial of Netaji dated 23.12.2015 (Appendix - XXX) 5. The Extracts from Manual of Practice and Procedure in the Government of India, Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs laying guidelines on the definition of an Assurance, the time limit for its fulfillment, dropping/deletion and extension, the procedure for fulfillment etc., besides maintenance of Register of Assurances and periodical reviews to minimize delays in implementation of the Assurances are reproduced at Appendix-XXXI. 6. During evidence, the attention of the representatives of the Ministry was primarily drawn to the delay in fulfillment of the Assurances. The Committee also required about the system in place in the Ministry for reviewing the pending Assurances, the compliance with the provisions of the 'Manual of Practice and Procedure in the Government of India' and coordination with the Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs in this regard. In reply, the Secretary, Urban Development stated as under:— “Due importance is given to the Assurances given in Parliament. Our senior officers conduct monthly meetings to review implementation of the pending Assurances. These meetings are held at the levels of Joint Secretary, Additional Secretary and myself. While examining various issues in these meetings, if it is noticed that some Parliamentary Assurances are long pending, we review them each division wise so that these Assurances could be fulfilled and request for repeated extension of time avoided. When we got the information for taking up these 30 Assurances in this sitting, we reviewed them twice. In this regard, I would like to apprise the Committee of the updated status. Implementation Reports in respect of 11 Assurances have been furnished. Some of these Reports have been furnished last week. Possibly, these are under process. 19 Assurances are still pending. Efforts have been made to implement these Assurances also. If we take up these 19 Assurances one by one it will be clearly known why these Assurances are pending.” 7. Subsequently, 19 Assurances mentioned at SI. Nos. 1,3,4,5,7,8,10,12,13,15, 16,18,19,20,23,25,26,27 and 28 have since been implemented and their Implementation Reports laid on the Table of the House as detailed in para 29 of this Report. Another two Assurances mentioned at Sl. Nos. 14 and 22 have been partly implemented while the Assurance mentioned at Sl No. 21 has been dropped. Observations/Recommendations 8. The Committee note that out of 30 Assurances examined by them, the Ministry have fully implemented a sizable number of 19 Assurances and partly implemented another two Assurances though after delays ranging from more 5 than one year to four years. The Committee appreciate that the performance of the Ministry in this regard is relatively better and the same may be attributed to the system of monthly meetings to review the implementation of pending Assurances at the levels of the Joint Secretary, Additional Secretary and Secretary in the Ministry. However, as many as 10 Assurances (including two Partly Implemented Assurances) are still pending for implementation even after a lapse of time ranging from more than one year to three years. In some cases, these review meetings failed to give positive impact. This is indicative of the fact that the monitoring and follow up action taken for implementation of Assurances by the Ministry still needs further improvement. The Committee are fully aware that implementation of Assurances related to policy matters and involving other Ministries/Departments require more time and may be difficult to be executed within the prescribed time period. However, proactive and sustained efforts need to be made to implement Assurances. The Committee, therefore, desire that the present arrangement of review mechanism instituted by the Ministry should be overhauled and further streamlined so as to enhance/speed up the requisite efforts and expedite implementation of Assurances. The Committee would also like the Ministry to finalise a time bound action plan to implement the aforesaid 10 pending Assurances examined by them. II. Review of Pending Assurances Pertaining to the Ministry of Urban Development 9. In the succeeding paragraphs, the Committee deal with some of the pending Assurances critically examined by them. A. National Academy of Public Works 10. In reply to USQ No. 4005 dated 06.08.2014 regarding 'National Academy of Public Works' (Appendix - VI), it was stated that the detailed blue print and contours of the proposed academy are yet to be finalised. 11. In their Status Note furnished in August 2016, the Ministry apprised the Committee of the further developments in the implementation of the Assurance as under:— “Extension for fulfilling the Assurance has been sought upto 05.02.2017 on the following grounds: The detailed blue print and contours of the proposed academy are under consideration and will take time in finalisation.” 12. During evidence, the representative of the Ministry elucidated the issue as under:— “The National Academy of Public Works is proposed to be set up in Ghaziabad. Already, there is CPWD training institute functioning within the premises. The proposal is to upgrade certain facilities available in the existing training institute and convert it into the National Academy of Public Works. Regarding that a three-member committee has been constituted by the DG, CPWD. He is also present here. They are preparing the details of what is the human resource 6

requirement and what are all the various departments which will be functioning there. They have sought time for preparing blue print for this.” 13. In this regard, the Director General, CPWD stated as under:— “There are many developmental issues in this — urban eco-system, urban transport system, urban planning, social fabric, environmental factor etc. We attempted considering all these issues in aims and objectives task force. On the basis of this, we will invite special interest, engage consultant who will guide us.” 14. To a pointed query as to what was done to implement the Assurance in the year 2015 and whether the above efforts were started after his assuming charge, the Director General, CPWD submitted as under:— “That has to be replied to after checking.” 15. On being enquired when was the three-member Committee constituted, the Director General, CPWD deposed before the Committee as under:— “I have no knowledge regarding this. As of today, I can inform you in this matter that we have drawn aims and objectives.” 16. Observing that an inordinate length of time has already been taken by the Ministry, the Committee directed that the matter be discharged personally at the level of DG, CPWD within a period of three months. Observations/Recommendations 17. The Committee are constrained to note that the Ministry of Urban Development have not been able to finalise the detailed blue print and contours of the proposed National Academy of Public Works even after a lapse of more than two and half years. Consequently, the Assurance given in reply to USQ No. 4005 dated 06.08.2014 regarding 'National Academy of Public Works' is yet to be implemented. While seeking unreasonably long extension of time upto 05.02.2017 for fulfilling the Assurance, the Ministry apprised that the detailed blue print and contours were under consideration and will take time for finalisation. During evidence, the Committee have been informed that a CPWD training institute is already functioning and the proposal is to upgrade certain facilities available in the existing training institute and convert it into the National Academy of Public Works. For this, a three-member Committee has been constituted by the Director General, CPWD to look into various issues like urban eco system, urban transport, urban planning, social fabric, environmental factor etc. However, the Director General, CPWD was apparently not well acquainted with the subject and could not provide certain information including the date when the said three member committee was constituted and the efforts made by the Ministry for implementing the Assurance especially in the year 2015. Apparently, there is lack of coordination amongst various Departments of the Ministry and the absence or ineffectiveness of the periodic reviews meetings. This assumes greater significance in view of the fact that the Committee during evidence had granted extension of time of 3 months only for fulfilling the Assurance and had stressed upon the Director General, 7

CPWD to monitor and discharge the work personally at his level but the work skill remains unaccomplished. Since the work involved is upgradation of certain facilities already available in the existing training institute, the Committee do not see justification for such inordinate delay of more than two and half years. In the present circumstances, the proposed academy will bring a paradigm shift in planning and executing public works and will ensure overall benefit of all the stakeholders. The Committee, therefore, urge upon the Ministry to scale up their intra-Ministry coordination and make earnest time bound efforts to complete the task within a specific time frame. B. Excess Staff in DDA 18. In reply to USQ No. 2810 dated 10.12.2014 regarding 'Excess Staff in DDA' (Appendix - IX), it was stated that the National Productivity Council (NPC) has submitted its Report on restructuring of DDA on 29.10.2014. The Report seeks rationalization and reduction of staff strength of DDA by carrying out comprehensive computerization and outsourcing certain functional activities. DDA is assessing the findings and recommendations for implementation. 19. Giving an update on the efforts made by them to implement the Assurance, the Ministry in their Status Note furnished in August 2016 stated as under:— “Extension for fulfilling the Assurance has been sought upto 10.09.2016 on the following grounds: DDA, vide letter dated 21.09.2015, has informed that there were gaps in the recommendation of NPC and therefore, NPC agreed to revisit their recommendation. DDA, vide letter dated 06.07.2016, has informed that NPC has submitted a draft revised proposal on 23.10.2015 on reconstructing of DDA. DDA has assessed the recommendations and requested the NPC to revisit the proposal with respect to Engineering, Land Disposal and Housing Departments, vide letter dated 10.06.2016. DDA, vide letter dated 25.07.2016, has informed that NPC has not yet submitted the revised final report.’’ 20. During evidence, the Secretary, Urban Development briefed the Committee about the NPC Report as under:— “They have not considered the average age of employees of DDA in their Report. The average age of the employees of DDA is 56 years and in the next four years, there will be lots of retirement. We have told NPC that when you gave the recommendations, this factor was not considered. Now, please give final recommendations keeping this factor in mind. Computerization is also going on in DDA. They have not considered this as well. Staff restructuring is a major issue.” 21. In this regard, the Vice-Chairman, DDA stated that the final revised Report of NPC was expected by September 2016. 8

22. The Committee desired to know whether any efforts were made to ensure that the NPC submitted the Report in a time bound manner. The reply, the Vice- Chairman DDA stated as under:— “We held meetings with the NPC we discussed each and every issue as to how to protect reputation of the NPC and how would the recommendations be like. They consulted these issues with their experts. They say 'we will be submitting our Report again'. Our meeting is going on continuously.” 23. On being enquired why it took such a long time of more than two years to take a decision to resolve the contentious issues, the Secretary, Urban Development responded as under:— “It should have not taken such a long time. When the draft Report came, the issues should have been discussed with the NPC and the final report should have been submitted. Once the final report is furnished, it is different matter as to which parts should be accepted by DDA and the Government. It is not right to keep the Report pending. We will look into it.” Observations/Recommendations 24. The Assurance given in reply to USQ No. 2810 dated 10.12.2014 regarding 'Excess Staff in DDA' primarily relates to reduction in staff strength of DDA. While a study report submitted by the National Productivity Council (NPC) on 29.10.2014 revealed that DDA has 40 percent excess staff and sought rationalization and reduction of staff strength by carrying out comprehensive computerization and outsourcing certain functional activities, DDA informed on 21.09.2015 that there were gaps in the recommendations of NPC as it had not considered the average age of employees of DDA which was 56 years and there will be lots of retirement in the next four years. Besides, DDA contested that computerization was already going on in DDA and this aspect was also not considered by the NPC while giving its recommendations. Subsequently, NPC agreed to revisit their recommendation and submitted a draft revised proposal on 23.10.2015. DDA again requested the NPC on 10.06.2016 to revisit the proposal with respect to Engineering, Land Disposal and Housing Departments but the NPC was yet to furnished the revised final report. The Committee are dismayed to note that the Assurance remain unfulfilled even after a lapse of more than two years ostensibly due to lack of initiative and lackadaisical attitude of DDA. Even though the NPC report was submitted to DDA on 29.10.2014, DDA took about one year to point out the gaps in the recommendation of the NPC (which was done on 21.09.2015). Furthermore, while the NPC submitted a draft revised proposal on 23.10.2015, DDA asked the NPC to revisit their proposal again after more than seven months. An analysis of this sequence of events reveals that there is total lack of coordination amongst the Ministry and DDA. DDA ought to have provided the complete picture and full information/data to the NPC so that the latter could give conclusive and actionable recommendations in the first instance itself. During evidence, the Secretary, Urban Development conceded that it is not right to keep the final report of the NPC long pending. In this regard, the Vice-Chairman DDA submitted that the final report of the NPC was expected by September 2016. However, no such thing seems to have happened as the Assurance is still pending. Needless 9 to mention, excess staff leads to loss of revenue and the Ministry/DDA need to assess the revenue loss as a result of excess staff in DDA and take appropriate steps to deal with the situation at the earliest. The Committee desire that the Ministry should intervene in the matter and take it up at the level of the Secretary, Urban Development so as to implement the Assurance in a time bound manner. The Committee also direct the Ministry to furnish a Part Implementation Report detailing efforts made by them to implement the Assurance. C. Land for Netaji Memorial (i) USQ No. 6641 dated 06.05.2015 regarding 'Land for Netaji Memorial' (Appendix - XXIX) (ii) USQ No. 4129 dated 23.12.2015 regarding 'Memorial of Netaji' (Appendix - XXX) 25. In reply to the above Questions, it was stated that the Government has received a request from Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose INA Trust for allotment of land in the vicinity of India Gate, New Delhi to set up Netaji Memorial and the matter is under examination. 26. In their Status Note furnished in August 2016, the Ministry apprised the Committee of the position regarding implementation of the Assurance as under:— “Extension for fulfilling the Assurance has been sought upto 06.08.2016 on the following grounds: Matter was placed before the Land Allotment Screening Committee (LASC) for its consideration. As no policy for allotment to Private Trusts is existing, LASC recommended to seek the views of Ministry of Culture. Accordingly, their views sought. Reply is awaited.” 27. During evidence, the representative of the Ministry elaborated on the issue as under:— “We received a request from a private trust for allotment of land for constructing a memorial of Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose. Government land is not allotted to private trust. So we made a request—if this memorial is to be constructed or the Ministry of Culture ask us for allotment of land for the memorial, we can allot land to the Ministry of Culture. We wrote a letter in this regard to the Ministry of Culture. Their reply is awaited.” Observations/Recommendations 28. The Committee find that the Assurance given in reply to USQ No. 6641 dated 06.05.2015 regarding 'Land for Netaji Memorial' has been pending for implementation for about two years despite giving a repeated Assurance in the form of reply to USQ No. 4129 dated 23.12.2015 regarding 'Memorial of Netaji.' The Committee have been informed that the Ministry had received a request from Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose INA Trust for allotment of land in the vicinity of India Gate, New Delhi to set up Netaji Memorial. Since Government land is not given to private trust, the Ministry of Culture have been asked to furnish their views in the matter as to whether they can recommend/sponsor the memorial and 10 their reply was still awaited. The Committee feel that a renowned freedom fighter like Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose deserves rich tributes from the citizens and the Government of the country and it is highly questionable that even after 70 years after Independence and his 120th Birth Anniversary, there is no memorial for Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose in the nation's capital. The Committee, therefore, desire that the Ministry of Urban Development should tie up with the Ministry of Culture and the Netaji Research Bureau in Kolkata to set up Netaji Memorial in New Delhi in such a way that the Ministry of Urban Development/Ministry of Culture own the land and the buildings and request the Netaji Research Bureau to set up the Memorial by providing all the necessary assistance including photographs, documents, letters, film footage, audio recordings etc. so that people in the nation's capital can actually visit a place where they can learn about the life and struggle of Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose. The Committee would like the Ministry to make earnest efforts and take up the matter at the highest level so that the said Netaij Memoiral is set up at the earliest. III. Implementation Reports 29. As per the Statements of the Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs, Implementation Reports in respect of the Assurances given in replies to the following SQs/USQs/General Discussion have since been laid on the Table of the House on the dates as mentioned against each:—

(i) Sl. No. 1 USQ No. 3854 dated 04.09.2012 07.12.2016 (ii) Sl. No. 3 USQ No. 147 dated 09.07.2014 10.08.2016 (iii) Sl. No. 4 USQ No. 254 dated 09.07.2014 10.08.2016 (iv) Sl. No. 5 USQ No. 1902 dated 23.07.2014 07.12.2016 (v) Sl. No. 7 USQ No. 2777 dated 10.12.2014 07.12.2016 (vi) Sl. No. 8 USQ No. 2785 dated 10.12.2014 07.12.2016 (vii) Sl. No. 10 USQ No. 2990 dated 10.12.2014 10.08.2016 (viii) Sl. No. 12 General Discussion dated 16.12.2014 07.02.2017 (Supplementary by Prof. Saugata Roy, M.P.) (ix) Sl. No. 13 USQ No. 3980 dated 17.12.2014 07.12.2016 (x) Sl. No. 14 USQ No. 255 dated 25.02.2015 10.08.2016 (Partly Implemented) (xi) Sl. No. 15 USQ No. 374 dated 25.02.2015 10.08.2016 (xii) Sl. No. 16 USQ No. 459 dated 25.02.2015 07.12.2016 (xiii) Sl. No. 18 SQ No. 121 dated 04.03.2015 07.12.2016 (Supplementary by Shri Ravneet Singh, M.P.) 11

(xiv) Sl. No. 19 SQ No. 121 dated 04.03.2015 07.12.2016 (Supplementary by Shri Vinod Kumar Boianapalli, M.P.) (xv) Sl. No. 20 SQ No. 121 dated 04.03.2015 10.08.2016 (Supplementary by Prof. Saugata Roy, M.P.) (xvi) Sl. No. 22 USQ No. 1469 dated 04.03.2015 10.08.2016 (Partly Implemented) (xvii) Sl. No. 23 USQ No. 2369 dated 11.03.2015 07.12.2016 (xviii) Sl. No. 25 USQ No. 3517 dated 18.03.2015 07.12.2016 (xix) Sl. No. 26 SQ No. 403 dated 22.04.2015 07.12.2016 (Supplementary by Shri Sukhbir Singh Jaunpuria, M.P.) (xx) Sl. No. 27 SQ No. 403 dated 22.04.2015 07.12.2016 (Supplementary by Prof. Saugata Roy, M.P.) (xxi) Sl. No. 28 USQ No. 4819 dated 22.04.2015 07.12.2016

NEW DELHI; DR. RAMESH POKHRIYAL ''NISHANK,'' 07 April, 2017 Chairperson, 17 Chaitra, 1939 (Saka) Committee on Government Assurances. APPENDIX I GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO. 3854 ANSWERED ON 04.09.2012 Mithi River Development Project 3854. DR. SANJEEV GANESH NAIK: SHRI CHANDRAKANT KHAIRE: SHRI MAROTRAO SAINUJI KOWASE: SHRI SANJAY DINA PATIL: Will the Minister of URBAN DEVELOPMENT be pleased to state: (a) the details, of funding cost and the present status of the Mithi River Development Project submitted by the Government of Maharashtra; (b) the reasons for delay in clearing the said project; and (c) the time by which it is likely to be cleared? ANSWER THE MINISTER OF STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT (SHRI SAUGATA ROY): (a) to (c) Government of Maharashtra had sent a revised Detailed Project Report (DPR) for Mithi River Development Project to the Ministry on 8th September, 2010 and the same was sent to Ministry of Water Resources on 27.9.2010, for technical appraisal. Central Water Commission (CWC), Ministry of Water Resources on exarnination of the revised DPR has asked for hydrological data from the Government of Maharashtra. The project has not been technically cleared by the Ministry Water Resources due to non-furnishing of hydrological data by the Government of Maharashtra.

12 APPENDIX II GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION No.3527 ANSWERED ON 12.02.2014 Revival of GISO 3527. SHRI KULDEEP BISHNOI: Will the Minister of URBAN DEVELOPMENT be pleased to state: (a) whether the Government has decided to wind up Government of India Stationery Office, (GISO), Kolkata and decentralize its work; (b) if so, the details thereof along with the reasons therefor; (c) the total annual expenditure on GISO and the staff strength of GISO; and (d) the steps taken by Government to revive GISO and generate revenue by commercializing its surplus capacity? ANSWER THE MINISTER OF STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT (SHRIMATI DEEPA DASMUNSHI): (a) No, Madam. (b) Does not arise. (c) The total expenditure of GISO for the year 2012-13 was Rs. 19.48 cr. The sanctioned staff strength of GISO as on 1.1.2014 is 622. (d) An Internal Work Study Unit (IWSU) was conducted in September, 2013 to review the staff strength and organizational structure of GISO. The recommendations given by the IWSU team in its report have been examined, and it is proposed to get a study done for comprehensive evaluation of the role, mandate and utility of GISO, and for redefining its role towards optimal utilization of manpower and other resources.

13 APPENDIX III GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO. 147 ANSWERED ON 9.7.2014 Training to Transport Professionals 147. SHRI K. PARASURAMAN: Will the Minister of URBAN DEVELOPMENT be pleased to state: (a) whether the Union Government imparted capacity building training to urban transport professionals at the national State/Union Territory (UT) and local levels; (b) if so, the details of States/UTs where training has been imparted so far; and (c) the time by which it is likely to be imparted in the remaining States/UTs, if any? ANSWER THE MINISTER OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT (SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU): (a) Yes, Madam. (b) Ministry of Urban Development under component 1A of World Bank— Global Environment Facility UNDP assisted Sustainable Urban Transport Project has started to train 1000 urban transport professionals city/State officials concerned with urban transport since 2013-14. Ministry in coordination with Institute of Urban Transport, Delhi has so far trained 624 professionals in 11 training programmes during 2013-14 as per details given below:

S. No. State/UT Place Period of training 1. Himachal Pradesh Shimla 27 - 31 May, 2013 2. Tamil Nadu Chennai 24 - 28 June, 2013 3. Karnataka Bangalore 22 - 26 July, 2013 4. Andhra Pradesh Hyderabad 21 - 23 August, 2013 5. Odisha Bhubaneswar 25 - 27 September, 2013 6. Maharashtra Pune 22 - 25 October, 2013 7. West Bengal Kolkata 15 -18 January, 2014 8. Assam (For North Guwahati 28 - 31 January, 2014 Eastern States) 9. Jharkhand Ranchi 4 - 7 February, 2014

14 15

S. No. State/UT Place Period of training 10. Punjab, Haryana & Chandigarh. 10-13 February, 2014 Chandigarh 11. Uttar Pradesh Lucknow 4-7 March, 2014 In addition to above, Ministry, in co-ordination with Centre for Environmental Planning and Technology University (CEPT), Ahmedabad has also organized two workshops on Capacity Building in Urban Transport—Leaders programmes in Urban Transport Planning and Management. So far two batches have been organized from 29th July, 2012 to March, 2013 and from July, 2013 to March, 2014. A total 64 participants on nomination basis attended the programme in these two batches from following States:

S. No. Name of the States/UTs/Organisations 1. Delhi 2. Gujarat 3. Karnataka 4. Kerala 5. Himachal Pradesh 6. Maharashtra 7. Madhya Pradesh 8. Mizoram 9. Odisha 10. Punjab . 11. Rajasthan 12. Tamil Nadu 13. Uttar Pradesh 14. Metros/ Indian Railways (c) Out of the target of training of 1000 urban transport professionals, remaining 376 are being trained during 2014-15. APPENDIX IV GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO. 254 ANSWERED ON 9.7.2014 Monorail Projects 254. SHRI PRATHAP SIMHA: Will the Minister of URBAN DEVELOPMENT be pleased to state: (a) whether the Government proposes to set up a National Urban Transport Authority of India and if so, the details thereof and the salient features thereto; (b) the details of proposals received so far by the Government for monorail in the country along with the details of proposals cleared, estimated cost of each project, criteria for funding and the funds sanctioned and released during the last three years and the current year, project and State-wise; (c) the number of proposals still pending and the reasons for such pendency along with the time by which these pending proposals are likely to be cleared; (d) the current status of ongoing projects and the time by which these are likely to be completed, project and State-wise; and (e) the steps taken by the Government for timely completion of these projects? ANSWER THE MINISTER OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT (SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU): (a) Yes, Madam. A Working Group for drafting law on National Urban Transport Authority of India has been set up and four meetings of this Working Group have been held till date. It is at a very preliminary stage presently. (b) & (c) Central Government had received proposals of Monorail from Government of Tamil Nadu (GoTN) for Chennai city and from Government of Kerala (GoK) for Thiruvananthapuram and Kozhikode. GoTN decided to implement the Chennai Monorail Project for a length of approximately 43.54 kms consisting of the following two Projects:— (Kms./Approx) Project Description Route Length Project-1: Poonamallee to Kathipara with a 20.68 link from Porur to Vadapalani Project-2: Vandalur to Velachery 22.86 Total 43.54

16 17

GoTN has also decided to implement Project-1 of Chennai Monorail from Poonamallee to Kathipara with a link from Porur to Vadapalani for a length of 20.68 kms. under Design, Build, Finance, Operation & Transfer (DBFOT) model with an estimated Project cost of Rs. 3235 crore for which they have floated bid on 3.2.2014. GoTN has not sought any funding from the Central Government. GoK has proposed to implement the following Monorail Projects on the model of Delhi Metro Rail Corporation i.e. on 50:50 model between Government of India and GoK:—

Name of the Monorail Project Length Estimated cost in Km. (Rs. in crore) Thiruvananthapuram Monorail 22.24 4,379.00 Project (from Technocity to Karamana) Kozhikode Monorail Project 14.2 2,310.00 (from Medical College to Meenchanda) GoTN had not furnished the detail calculation/analysis of achieving Financial Internal Rate of Return (FIRR) 8% or more. GoTN has been advised that FIRR should be calculated and incorporated in the Detailed Project Report (DPR) and accordingly the DPR be modified. GoK has not prepared the Comprehensive Mobility Plan (CMP) for Thiruvananthapuram and Kozhikode cities which is a mandatory requirement for consideration of Mass Rapid Transit Systems (MRTS) Projects. Hence, the DPR has not been considered in the Central Government. GoK has been advised to prepare the CMP of the two cities first. Therefore, at present, no proposals of Monorail are pending with the Central Government. (d) to (e) Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA) is constructing Monorail in Mumbai in two Phases. Phase-1 is from Wadala to Chembur of total length of 8.93 km. with 7 Stations and Phase-2 is from Jacob Circle to Wadala of length 11.28 km. with 10 Stations at an approved cost of Rs. 2,639 crore (including 3 years O&M cost & excluding taxes). Phase-1 (Wadala-Chembur of length 8.93 kms.) has become operational from 2nd February, 2014. The work of Phase-2 is expected to be commissioned in June, 2015. Mumbai Monorail is fully funded by the State Government and GoI has not provided any Central assistance to the project. APPENDIX V GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO. 1902 ANSWERED ON 23.7.2014 Irregularities in Metro Rail Projects 1902. SHRI ASADUDDIN OWAISI: Will the Minister of URBAN DEVELOPMENT be pleased to state: (a) whether alleged irregularities have come to the notice of the Government in the Delhi Airport Metro Rail Project; (b) if so,whether the Government has investigated the alleged irregularities committed in this project and if so, the outcome thereof; (c) whether customs duty waiver was granted to private companies on the lines of Government owned companies; and (d) if so, the details thereof and the reasons therefor? ANSWER THE MINISTER OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT (SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU): (a) Yes, Madam. (b) The Government constituted an Enquiry Committee consisting of the then Additional Secretary & Chief Vigilance Officer (CVO), Ministry of Urban Development (MoUD) and the then Additional Member (Works), Railway Board to enquire into the cause of failure of the defects in the civil structure of Delhi Airport Metro Express Line and fixing the responsibility of officials for the same. The report of the Enquiry Committee was referred to Cental Vigilance Commission (CVC), and as per the CVC's advice, the report has been forwarded to Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. (DMRC) for examination by the Board of DMRC and for taking action against various official of DMRC, Consultants and Contractors. DMRC has also been directed to examine system improvements to avoid recurrence of such failure in the future. (c) No waiver in Custom Duty is provided by MoUD to Metro Rail Companies. (d) Does not arise.

18 APPENDIX VI GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO. 4005 ANSWERED ON 6.8.2014 National Academy of Public Works 4005. SHRI VENKATESH BABU T.G.: Will the Minister of URBAN DEVELOPMENT be pleased to state: (a) whether the Government proposes to set up National Academy of Public Works; (b) if so, the details thereof and its aims and objectives along with the time by which it is likely to be set up; (c) whether this institute will take up skill upgradation programmes including that of civil engineers; and (d) if so, the details thereof and if not, the reasons therefor? ANSWER THE MINISTER OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT (SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU): (a) to (d) Yes, Madam. The detailed blue print and contours of the proposed academy are yet to be finalized.

19 APPENDIX VII GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO. 2777 ANSWERED ON 10.12.2014 Construction of Flats 2777. SHRI NALIN KUMAR KATEEL: Will the Minister of URBAN DEVELOPMENT be pleased to state: (a) the details of VVIP bungalows/flats proposed to be constructed in Delhi in place of the bungalows/flats which have surpassed their life span, location and type-wise; (b) whether the Government also proposes to construct new flats in place of existing flats in North and South Avenue, Delhi and if so, the details thereof; and (c) the present status of the above proposals? ANSWER THE MINISTER OF STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT (SHRI BABUL SUPRIYO): (a) to (c) There is a proposal for reconstruction of bungalows in Lutyens Bungalow Zone area, New Delhi. Total 516 bungalows under Type VI, VII & VIII are to be re-constructed. The proposal is at draft stage. There is a proposal for redevelopment of the North Avenue and South Avenue. Re-development proposal has been approved by the House Committee of Lok Sabha & Rajya Sabha.

20 APPENDIX VIII GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO. 2785 ANSWERED ON 10.12.2014 Transparency in CPWD 2785. SHR1 T. RADHAKRISHNAN : Will the Minister of URBAN DEVELOPMENT be pleased to state: (a) Whether Central Public Works Department (CPWD) lacks transparency and accountability; (b) If not, whether all details of works undertaken by them is made available in their website if so, the details thereof; (c) Whether CPWD generally fails to complete projects on scheduled time and if so, the reasons therefor; (d) Whether CPWD intends to put in public domain the details of persons who have bagged contracts of maintenance, Works assigned and amount sanctioned to each one of them in each division and if so, the details thereof and if not, the reasons therefor; . (e) Whether the Government is likely to involve private participation in CPWD projects; and (f) If so, the details thereof? ANSWER THE MINISTER OF STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT (SHRI BABUL SUPRIYO): (a) to (f) CPWD does not lack transparency and accountability. Details of works undertaken by CPWD are available on their website. CPWD generally completes the projects on scheduled time as per sanction, Reasons beyond control of CPWD sometimes causes delay in completion of works.Facility of putting in public domain the details of persons who have bagged contracts of maintenance, works assigned and amount sanctioned to each one of them in each division is available. In Development of CPWD land at Ghitorni, Re-development of GPRA colonies at Srinivaspuri, Sarojininagar, Mohammad Pur, Devnagar and multilevel parking at CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, Private Participation/Alternate Funding Mode are at various stages of implementation.

21 APPENDIX IX GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO. 2810 ANSWERED ON 10.12.2014 Excess Staff in DDA 2810. SHRI PONGULETI SRINIVASA REDDY: Will the Minister of URBAN DEVELOPMENT be pleased to state: (a) whether a study report by National Productivity Council (NPC) to revamp the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) has revealed that DDA has 40 per cent excess staff; (b) if so, whether the Government has assessed the revenue loss as a result thereof; and (c) the steps taken/proposed to be taken to deal with the situation? ANSWER THE MINISTER OF STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT (SHRI BABUL SUPRIYO): (a) Delhi Development Authority (DDA) has informed that it has received a report from National Productivity Council (NPC) on restructuring of DDA. The report seeks rationalization and reduction of staff strength by carrying out comprehensive computerization and outsourcing certain functional activities. (b) & (c) NPC has submitted the report to DDA on 29.10.2014. DDA assesses the findings and recommendations for implementation.

22 APPENDIX X GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO. 2990 ANSWERED ON 10.12.2014 Sewerage Treatment System 2990. SHRI BISHNU PADA RAY: Will the Minister of URBAN DEVELOPMENT be pleased to state: (a) whether the Andaman and Nicobar Administration has formulated a scheme for sewerage disposal system; (b) if so, the details thereof; (c) whether the Government has conducted any study on the sewerage disposal system in the Island; (d) if so, the details and the outcome thereof; and (e) the total expenditure incurred on such study? ANSWER THE MINISTER OF STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT (SHRI BABUL SUPRIYO): (a) Yes, Madam. (b) A scheme is formulated in the Annual Plan of Andaman Public Works Department (APWD) by the name 'Improvement of Sewerage System in Port Blair area' under Urban Development Sector. (c) & (d) Andaman & Nicobar Administration (A&N Admn.) has engaged Water & Power Consultancy Services (India) Ltd. (WAPCOPS) as Consultant for study and formulation of Detailed Project Report of sewerage disposal system in Port Blair Municipal and adjoining rural areas. WAPCOPS Consultancy Services has carried out detailed study on the Integrated Sewerage Disposal System and the DPR was received in the Ministry of Urban Development. Ministry of Urban Development has suggested certain modification/compliance, which are presently being carried out by the A&N Admn/ WAPCOPS Consultancy Services. (e) Rs. 98.44 lakhs.

23 APPENDIX XI

General Discussion dt. 16.12.2014 THE MINISTER OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, MINISTER OF HOUSING AND URBAN POVERTY ALLEVIATION AND MINISTER OF PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS (SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU): Hon. Deputy Speaker, around 17 of our colleagues from various States and shades including all six MPs, of course, 7th MP. is our hon. Minister, of Delhi have spoken on this Bill. Sir, to some extent, I agree with Tathagata Satapathyji but he is not there. If you look at it from one side, it is pro-poor, supporting the helpless, accepting the reality and then moving forward. If you look at it from another side, what I spoke yesterday in the House about not allowing unauthorized construction and collusion between officers, builders, individuals and others, there is a dichotomy on this. In my own mind, I have not convinced fully. But at the same time, at the end of the day, what is the reality? If you look at the reality then you will find the answer automatically.

I have heard all these people namely Shri Parvesh Sahib Singh Verma, Shri Deepender Singh Hooda, Shrimati K. Maragatham, Prof. Saugata Roy, Shri Tathagata Satpathy, Shri Shrirang Appa Barne, Dr. A. Sampath, Shri B. Vinod Kumar, Shri Bhagwant Mann, Shri Dushyantji, Shri Ramesh Bidhuri, Shri Manoj Tiwari, Maheshji, Dr. Udit Raj, Shrimati Meenakashi Lekhi and other friends. Shri Manoj Tiwari ji went even to the extent of singing a song saying, "Venkaiahji, I love you." I have no problem with that. My wife is not going to misunderstand you because many people love me and write love letters to me since my younger days. That is not for other reasons but for political and public activities. So, I have no problem on that count. My wife. is here only in Delhi. I will tell her definitely that there is one more person who has joined ... (Interruptions) SHRI MALLIKARJUN KHARGE (GULBARGA) Why do you have such doubt in your mind?...(Interruptions)

SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU: There is no doubt in my mind. If there is any doubt in your mind, it should be removed. That is all. ... (Interruptions) SHRI MALLIKARJUN KHARGE (GULBARGA) You are speaking from your heart. That is why, I said it. ...(Interruptions) SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU: Yes, I am speaking from my heart. There is no doubt about it.

When Prof. Saugata Rai was speaking, I asked him: "Do you have any suggestions?" It is because there are serious issues involved. At the end of the debate, if you go by the reality of Delhi and if people can visit some parts of Delhi, they can understand the reality. In Sangam Vihar, which is within the city, around five lakh people are living there but in the Master Plan, it is shown as forest land. There is not even an iota of forest anywhere there. What should I do? Can I go and

24 25 then make them vacate? Even if I want, can I do it? Is it possible? That is another issue. Then, Sonia Vihar has half a lakh population; Burari has two lakh population; Rithala has 2 lakh population; Molarband has one lakh population; Badarpur Extension A & B has one lakh population; Mithapur Sakthi Vihar has one and a half lakh population, it is a riverbed also; Mahavir Enclave has five lakh population; Vishwas Nagar has one lakh population; Bhagawan Nagar has one lakh population. There are many areas like this. The people are living in these areas for years. As someone has said, they have electricity connection, drinking water connection and also other facilities provided by respective civic agencies and the government day-to-day. This is One side of the picture. The other side of the picture is that. Some people are saying: "What is happening to these politicians? Delhi is the Capital of the country. Delhi is our pride. They are destroying the beauty by encouraging unauthorized construction and allowing 20 feet road. They are allowing people to come and occupy land and then demand regularization. Since they are all politicians, they try to regularize it." This view is also there. As someone has rightly said, I am not denying it but, at the same time, we belong to different parties and are here in Parliament to serve people. We have to go by the general view. But, at the same time, on a basic principle of public order and a civic order, we have to create awareness among the people and then take people also along with us. As Shri Deepender was telling in the morning about bulldozer and all, there is an emotive issue involved in that. In this deep winter, can anybody with common sense try to remove people even if there is a Court Order? They should have gone to the Tribunal and explained to them by saying: "Sir, we are in the end of November. It is very cold in Delhi." Sir, sometimes I feel odd to be in Delhi and the dress which I am wearing is not to my liking. I feel uncomfortable. I am comfortable like you, Sir, in our own traditional dress; with shirt and dhoti we feel elated and happy also. Even, Shri Kharge ji also would feel happy in the traditional dress. The problem is this. Can you allow health to be affected? In Delhi, suddenly, at times, the temperature comes down. In such a situation, if somebody goes and removes people and put them on road, naturally there will be reaction. I do admit it. But the other side, as I told you, is that we have to regulate the growth. Otherwise, we will have only slums around; we have unauthorized colonies and then we will face a situation where people will say: ‘‘fnYyh D;k gS] us'kuy dSfiVy D;k gS] what is this country? They do not have any minimum standard.’’ Sir, the other day I was in Spain. I was landing from the flight. I saw from the flight the Barcelona city. When I was about to land, I saw one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight lanes on every side. They are all with similar dimensions. They have planned it. It is not that they have not developed. They have developed also but at the same time they have preserved their ancient heritage, culture and also retained their architecture. They have carried out improvements by retaining their architecture and at the same they made changes. We have to really create awareness 26 among the people in this country also and then slowly try to implement the rules and regulations. For that, you need time. I do not want to get into any blame game; there is no meaning in that and no purpose will be served. No purpose would be served by saying 'who is responsible for this haphazard growth of Delhi, how many years you have ruled, how many years we have ruled'. The point is to accept the reality. Shri Tathagata Satpathy had asked as to what was the urgency. He is not here now. He said, it is being done because the elections are round the corner. It is not because of elections. If we do not extend it further beyond 31st December, 2014, the next day, sealing, removal of encroachments, unauthorised and irregular colonies will start. There will be hue and cry in Delhi. There would be a massive human problem. Some hon. Members was telling that people have come from distant places like Kerala, Tamil Nadu, etc. So, Delhi is a mini India. People from different parts of the country came here and are settling here. They do not have adequate means of livelihood. Initially, they tried to stay in some Government places and then from the Government places, they tried to move to better housing facilities. Sir, Meenakshiji was telling that there was no proper colonisation. There were no private people coming forward to develop colonies initially and the Government was going slow — whichever Government was there. So, the Government does not provide housing. There is no adequate housing. There is a shortage of housing in Delhi as well as in the entire country. But the private people have not come forward, with the result, people have settled haphazardly in different parts of Delhi. That is the reality of the situation. That being the case, after so much of introspection, internal consultation, I have come to the conclusion that there is no way other than extending the date. That is the background. I want to be frank with the House. I am also doing it with a heavy heart. Some people may criticise me tomorrow. Some people may appreciate me; others may criticise me saying that 'during this man's period, this has been extended by three years and this haphazard situation has continued'. Even if you have the magic wand, it is not easy to do all these things. Finalisation of master plan, regularisation of unauthorised colonies, taking care of the environmental aspects and all are all not the easy things to do. Then, there are three Municipal Councils. We have NDMC. We have DDA. We have National Capital Region Board about which Deepender Hoodaji was telling that it must have more teeth and power. I am happy that he has realised it now because this Board periodically meets and passes some resolutions, which are not binding on States. So, if a Board presided over by a Minister passes a resolution and if the others do not accepts it or do not act upon it, it has no meaning. So, definitely, the Board has to be given more teeth, but that can be done only in consultation with the stakeholders including those from the nearby States—Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan. I have to take all of them into confidence before going further in this. 27

Sir, what is the time at my disposal? I am only seven months old — not in age but in this Ministry. Frankly, I am also trying to understand things. I always believe that the Ministers, politicians and people in pubic life must go on — earn, earn, earn, no — learn, learn, learn. That is the real thing. So, that being the case, I am trying to learn. I think, Meenakshiji has also told about Jagmohanji. He is a different man. He has a vision, he has a clarity. He had the dynamism at that time in that age. He was able to do certain things. But otherwise, dealing with problems of Delhi, is like dealing with the country, I must confess it in this House. I have been studying it. Sir, there is a paucity of time. I thought I must get some more time so that we—my officers, all the seven MP's of Delhi, and other interested parties—should take all these inputs. Our hon. Member from Haryana, Deependraji made certain suggestions; an MP from Uttar Pradesh, Shri Kanwar Singh Tanwar had also made his suggestions; and then, an hon. Member from Rajasthan also made his points. So, we should take all these inputs and then go for a comprehensive master plan. Mr. Dushyant Singh was suggesting certain things. We have to take care of all these aspects and then finalise the master plan. It is not that easy. Even if you have intellect, even if you are ready to work hard, it is not that easy to do things. Sir, somebody was saying, can you allow vertical construction in the farmhouses? If it is allowed, it cannot be a farmhouse at all. Its beauty would be lost. Already, some people have mishandled it and some people have gone for extra constructions etc. That is another issue. So, any action you take, there will be reaction. I was discussing with my ministerial colleague, Harsh Vardhan Ji. Harsh Vardhan Ji represents the other side. The Delhi middle class and the educated people have a different view about this. But the poor people, the lower middle class, the working class and the people, who have come from different parts of the country, have a different view. So, you have to marry somewhere. That is the effort I am making. Someone asked me, "Can You give an assurance that you will not come to this House for further extension?". I hope so. By 2017, this issue has to be resolved, to the extent possible, to the satisfaction of one and all I will try to definitely work in that direction of not coming back to this House for further extension. I will do my best. This much assurance I can give you. I do not know what exactly it will happen at all but at the same time. I have the confidence that with the cooperation of the Members from different sides, we will try to do it. But the Master Plan has to be completed by 2015. You cannot wait till 2017 for completion of the Master Plan. The finalisation of the Master Plan has to be done at the earliest. Once the Master Plan is finalised, then we must go for implementation. Also, with regard to the issue that was raised about generation of black money, this is another issue. The point is, the moment you allow regularisation and the moment you allow people to sell or purchase their properties, there will be some transactions. In those transactions, definitely, money also will change hands. That being the case, some money should come for the development of Delhi city. That 28 should be in white. So, how do you go about it? That is also an important aspect on which we have to really show interest. Sir, certain important points were made by the hon. Members because it is a very serious subject. Shri Parvesh Sahib Singh Verma said that 25-30 lakh people are going to be affected by this decision either way. I agree with him. That is why, the Government has taken it on top priority. Then, with regard to the background of Delhi, I am happy Deepender Ji has recalled the background of Delhi. Sometimes, I feel, instead of Delhi, it should have been either Indraprastha or Hastinapura. Some such historical name should have been more appropriate for this city. I am not proposing anything. Do not worry. Tomorrow, again you will be saying, we want Adjournment Motion. Venkaiah Naidu wants to change the name. This is there. We should always feel proud of our ancestors, our heritage and culture. As he said rightly VksD;ks ds ckn fnYyh cM+k 'kgj gSA Shanghai and all other cities come next. If that being the case, you have to see that Delhi's unique character and also its beauty are maintained, to the extent possible. So, we will definitely make efforts in that direction. Time bound regularisation also has been suggested. The hon. Members also said that we should not look at Delhi in isolation. Yes, we must go for a comprehensive plan for the entire NCR region. I agree with our hon. Members. I will keep it in mind while finalising the Master Plan. Then, with regard to giving more powers to the. NCR Planning Board, I welcome that suggestion. I will keep that also in mind. Then, with regard to the suggestion of Madam Maragatham and what she said, though it is not directly connected with the Bill, it is a reality. A lot of people, who have come from other parts of the country, do not have Aadhaar card; they do not have ration card; and they do not have the other means here. A special drive has to be taken up to take care of them because I know people coming from Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh and the North-East do not have anybody here to depend. So, definitely, those people have to be given a helping hand by the administration. I have already told my Ministry to give a special treatment to the people who have come from far off places. Then, their educational needs, their cultural aspirations and their other requirements have to be taken care of. That is why, the Government is a little liberal in giving Tamil Education Society, Bengal Education Society or even Telugu Education Society a number of schools. Recently, the Kannada people also met me. In this connection, I would also like to tell the House that we have to respect the heroes of different regions. So, I take the House into confidence and then say that recently I suggested to them that near the Karnataka Bhavan, the Metro Station has to be named after Sir Mokshagundam Visvesvaraya Metro Railway Station. That has been the suggestion and it has been accepted. Then, another one is about Shrimati Durgabai Deshmukh, great freedom fighter. Kharge Ji will be knowing better. Shrimati Deshmukh is the first Finance Minister's wife and also a woman reformer. 29

One metro railway station is going to be named after her name. These are all small things. But this will really send a message that Delhi takes care of everybody and then remembers all the national heroes, who have contributed their might for social reforms, for freedom movement or for other activities in the country. Then, there are 1200 and plus unauthorised colonies in Delhi. What you are going to do with regard to 'unauthorised colonies is another issue. I can take the House into confidence because nothing is secret that is engaging my attention. I have already held a discussion with the Lt. Governor. I held discussion with the Chief Secretary. I held discussion with different agencies of Delhi Government. I also held discussions with my Minister and then six Members of Parliament. I also held discussion with other people. I am in touch with the Law Department and the Legislative Department. The Government is moving in the direction of regularising those colonies where poor people have been living for years together. That also is unwell. The final details can be given only after the final contours are adopted and accepted by relevant authorities. Certain things are to be done by Delhi Government. Certain things have to be done by Central Government. So, keeping that in mind, we are moying in that direction. I want to share this with our hon. Members. Prof. Saugata Roy said that there is a lopsided development in Delhi. I do agree with him. With regard to DDA and with regard to L&DO, there has to be one point of guidance for them. If there are two different agencies, definitely there will be some practical problem. I will discuss it with the hon. Prime Minister and also with my colleagues and try to find out a solution at the earliest. Many people have suggested me to take a final decision in respect of unauthorised colonies. I have told you that we are going to take a final decision at the earliest. With regard to J.J. colonies and valuation of the land and stopping of the black money, I have already mentioned that it will also attract our attention. dqN yksxksa us dgk gS fd ;g leL;k dsoy fnYyh dh ugha gS] cfYd iwjs ns'k dh gSA exj dsUnz ljdkj ns'k esa vyx&vyx 'kgjksa ds fy, dkuwu ugha cuk ldrh gSA fnYyh ;wfu;u VsfjVksjh vkSj ns'k dh jkt/kkuh Hkh gSA blfy, ge bfu';sfVo ysdj dkuwu cuk jgs gSaA ckdh bykdksa esa ogka dh izns'k ljdkjsa ogka ds jsxqys'ku ds ckjs esa /;ku nsdj dke djsaA Urban Development is a State subject. We will only give broad guidelines and broad models. But the final decision has to be taken by urban local bodies and the State Government. Legislation is the job of the State Government and other regulations are done by local bodies. Some hon. Member said that if the Government is not able to provide basic amenities to the poor people, then what will happen? It is our endeavour to see that basic amenities are provided to the poor people. The poor of this country have primary right over the land and also over the resources. That is very clear. They are our brothers. Irrespective of their caste, creed, sex, religion and regions, they are our people. Some Members talk about the basic amenities, particularly public transport. Yesterday, we discussed it also. There are more than 80 lakh plus vehicles in Delhi. You cannot go on adding vehicles. The problem is that adding vehicles also has 30 become a form of prestige. In some families there is a car for each member of the family. If they have wealth, we have no problem. It is not the question of wealth alone. It is a question of congestion you are creating on the roads of Delhi putting the common man to hardship. That is a big problem. This is not acceptable. So, we must have a comprehensive transport policy on MRTS, BRTS and also metro rail. Metro rail is the need of the hour. But it is also cost prohibitive. With regard to BRT we had some mixed experience earlier. But, at the same time, there are some good examples also. I am told about Ahmedabad and Jaipur. Some people are also talking about indoor system. I do not know what exactly they are talking about. We have to take their experience also because it is for the National Capital Delhi. Before moving further, I will study those experiences and then try to move forward. Everyone, particularly, the Delhi Members and people who are aside with Delhi including Shri Bhagwant Mann and other people have suggested that this cut-off date has to be extended. Since the last two days I have been holding consultations and discussions with regard to the extension of the cut-off date. As of now, the cut-off date is 2007. As I was discussing earlier, what is the reality? Can you remove people who have settled after 2007 and who have been living in that place by 2014? In the original Bill it is 2007. So, Deputy-Speaker, Sir, with your permission, I want to move an amendment also. Seven of the Delhi Members have given a notice for moving amendment for extending the cut-off date from February or March of 2007 to end of 2014, but I am willing to go by the collective wisdom of the Members of the House and I want it to be extended by 1st June, 2014. Another issue raised is that it is supposed to be the greenest Capital. What will happen if you do this? This is a big question, and I have no readymade answer to this. Let me be frank that I have no readymade answer to this. Some time back, I developed the habit of coming by Metro, and whenever I come from outside I get on to a Metro and travel happily. It takes 18 minutes to my house and the amount of greenery in the initial entry point really makes you very happy as everything is green and nothing else is seen, and the moment you cross the greenery and come to the other areas — because the train will be moving — you will see what is happening. It is a pathetic condition. But at the same time, the planners, rules and the people at that time could not prevent it and there may be valid reasons for it also. This has become a reality, and that is why this extension is being accepted. Otherwise, Shri Dushyant, as a youngster who had education abroad, was going by the real conditions in India. We have to accept the reality and try to take care of it. But we should also slowly evolve a method, and I have three things in mind that everyone in Delhi — in the coming days — should follow, namely, rainwater harvesting must be made a must; solar lighting must be made a must; LED lighting must be made a must; and planting trees, growing it, and then supporting them should also become a part of our campaign. This campaign will succeed only if it becomes a people's campaign, and secondly, it should be part of the urban plan approval by the Municipal Authorities. Madam Jayalalithaa, the former Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu, some time back had made it mandatory to have rainwater harvesting. I can tell you about it as I 31 frequently go to that side. My daughter also lives there. So, I have the experience. Rainwater harvesting has helped Chennai, which was starving without water earlier. There are some more examples of other States also about rainwater harvesting. The watershed movement in Gujarat has caught up the imagination as also the housing projects in Maharashtra even by earlier Congress Governments also. There are examples of housing projects of Maharashtra and Gujarat. Maharashtra has just now come to BJP, but earlier it was held by Congress for a long time. So, these are some shining examples from where we can take clues and try to implement them in our respective areas also. ... (Interruptions) SHRI N.K. PREMACHANDRAN (KOLLAM): You did not mention the example of Kerala. SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU : Kerala is God's own country. I am thankful to the people of Kerala that they are not destroying the nature. I salute them because if you go to Kerala, there is no match to Kerala because on the one side there is greenery and on the other there is water, and whenever you call for water, it will come in the evening. SHRI KODIKUNNIL SURESH (MAVELIKKARA): You should come and stay there. SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU : In your Idukki forest? SHRI KODIKUNNIL SURESH (MAVELIKKARA): But your Party is not there. SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU: You are trying your best to help my Party also. One meaningful suggestion that has been given with regard to putting it online is this. I firmly believe that we must try to reduce human involvement to the extent possible and try to make online application, sanction, and renewal. As regards information, everybody must be in a position to access what is the information; what its present situation is; where does his application stand; and whether it has been sanctioned or not. That will really eliminate corruption to the maximum possible extent. I do not say that it will be totally eliminated because in this country there is no dearth of intelligence, as far as the corrupt fellows are concerned. If you come up with some idea, they will come up with some counter-idea next day morning: That is the situation. At the same time, I totally agree with the suggestion. I have already started implementing it in CPWD. The details of more than 2,500 works of CPWD have been put online now. One can visit the site to find out at what stage it is, why there is delay, what the scheduled time is and what the scheduled time of completion is, etc. One can see these details on the site. I have told the authorities that within six months the entire CPWD activities must go online. I know what the impression of people is about CPWD. Keeping that in mind, we are trying to cleanse the system. The hon. Members have given suggestions with regard to the holistic Master Plan, the National Capital Regional Planning Board being strengthened, regularisation of unauthorised colonies, and consultations with the elected Governments. However, 32 the reason why I am not taking action on all these things is that I want to have an elected Government in Delhi. After all, they represent the people better than us. They know the ins and outs of Delhi and they have the full knowledge. The Members of the Legislative Assembly of Delhi and the elected Chief Minister or other Ministers will have full understanding and they know the local situation better than the Central Government, though the Central Government as on today can take care of the State also because there is no elected Government; the Lieutenant Governor also works in unison with the Government of India. Digitisation of all maps is an important issue. I have already given direction to digitise all maps and put them online. I hope my officers will be able to complete it at the earliest. Three MCDs have already said that they are in an advanced stage. DDA and NDMC have also been directed to do it by lst January 2015. I told the DDA that everything should be online. DDA is again another white elephant, which is what people say. However, I want to make DDA to live up to the expectations of the people. That is why I have told them to start doing this. I want to share another important information with the people. Some time back, one of the prominent newspapers of Delhi, I have no hesitation in taking the name of that newspaper, The Hindustan Times, conducted a debate among various well-meaning people where a lot of professionals have come together. They gave certain suggestions. On those suggestions, I had an interaction and now I have appointed a committee headed by my Secretary, Urban Development, Shri Shankar Aggarwal with representatives of different Ministries because Delhi's development is linked with National Highways, Railways, Environment Ministry, Defence Ministry, the Delhi Government and the DDA. All these departments are involved. So, we have appointed a committee and that committee held a number of sittings. They have now given a report on decongesting Delhi, which is also placed online. I would request all the Members and also the general public to please see it online and if you have any suggestions with regard to decongesting Delhi, you are welcome to give your suggestions. After receiving the suggestions, the Government will finalise the decongestion plan. I am planning to have a meeting with other colleague Ministers also because the Prime Minister said, "Instead of talking to each other on files, talk together in person". So, I will be convening a meeting of my colleagues also and then we will be able to finalise the plan for decongestion of Delhi. I will take the advice of the Haryana Government, the Rajasthan Government and also the Uttar Pradesh Government in this regard to the extent the areas fall in their jurisdiction because it is interconnected with Delhi. Keeping that in mind we will do it If the House agrees, afterwards I will move the amendments. Thank you. HON. DEPUTY-SPEAKER: The question is: "That the Bill to amend the National Capital Territory of Delhi Laws (Special Provisions) Second Act, 2011, be taken into consideration." The motion was adopted. 33

HON. DEPUTY-SPEAKER: The House will now take up clause-by-clause consideration of the Bill. Clauses 2 to 4 HON. DEPUTY-SPEAKER: The question is: "That clauses 2 to 4 stand part of the Bill." The motion was adopted. Clauses 2 to 4 were added to the Bill. Clause 5 Amendments made: Page 2, after line 5, insert— "(a) in sub-section (1), in clause (c), for the words, figures and letters "up to the 8th day of February, 2007", the words, figures and letters "up to the lst day of June, 2014" shall be substituted; (aa) in sub-section (2), in clause (ii), for the words, figures and letters "up to the 8th day of February, 2007", the words, figures and letters "up to the lst day of June, 2014" shall be substituted; (1) Page 2, line 6, for "(a)", substitute "(aaa)" (2) (Shri M. Venkaiah Naidu) HON. DEPUTY SPEAKER: The question is: "That clause 5, as amended, stand part of the Bill." The motion was adopted. Clause 5, as amended, was added to the Bill. Clause 1, the Enacting Formula and the Title were added to the Bill. SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU: I beg to move: "That the Bill, as amended, be passed." HON. DEPUTY SPEAKER: The question is:. "That the Bill, as amended, be passed." The motion was adopted. SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU: I would like to thank the entire House for their support. APPENDIX XII General Discussion dt. 16.12.2014 THE MINISTER OF "URBAN DEVELOPMENT, MINISTER OF HOUSING AND URBAN POVERTY ALLEVIATION AND MINISTER OF PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS (SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU): Hon. Deputy Speaker, around 17 of our colleagues from various States and shades including all six MPs, of course, 7th MP is our hon. Minister, of Delhi have spoken on this Bill. Sir, to some extent, I agree with Tathagata Satpathyji but he is not there. If you look at it from one side, it is pro-poor, supporting the helpless, accepting the reality and then moving forward. If you look at it from another side, what I spoke yesterday in the House about not allowing unauthorized construction and collusion between officers, builders, individuals and others, there is a dichotomy on this. In my own mind, I have not convinced fully. But at the same time, at the end of the day, what is the reality? If you look at the reality then you will find the answer automatically. I have heard all these people namely Shri Parvesh Sahib Singh Verma, Shri Deepender Singh Hooda, Shrimati K. Maragatham, Prof. Saugata Roy, Shri Tathagata Satpathy, Shri Shrirang Appa Barne, Dr. A. Sampath, Shri B. Vinod Kumar, Shri Bhagwant Mann, Shri Dushyantji, Shri Ramesh Bidhuri, Shri Manoj Tiwari, Shri Maheshji, Dr. Udit Raj, Shrimati Meenakashi Lekhi and other friends. Shri Manoj Tiwari ji went even to the extent of singing a song saying, "Venkaiahji, I love you." I have no problem with that. My wife is not going to misunderstand you because many people love me and write love letters to me since my younger days. That is not for other reasons but for political and public activities. So, I have no problem on that count. My wife, is here only in Delhi. I will tell her definitely that there is one more person who has joined ...(Interruptions). SHRI MALLIKARJUN KHARGE (GULBARGA): Why do you have such doubt in your mind? ...(Interruptions) SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU: There is no doubt in my mind. If there is any doubt in your mind, it should be removed. That is all. ...(Interruptions) SHRI MALLIKARJUN KHARGE (GULBARGA): You are speaking from your heart. That is why, I said it. .... (Interruption) SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU: Yes, I am speaking from my heart. There is no doubt about it. When Prof. Saugata Roy was speaking, I asked him: "Do you have any suggestions?" It is because there are serious issues involved. At the end of the debate, if you go by the reality of Delhi and if people can visit some parts of Delhi, they can understand the reality. In Sangam Vihar, which is within the city, around five lakh people are living there but in the Master Plan, it is shown as forest land.

34 35

There is not even an iota of forest anywhere there. What should I do? Can I go and then make them vacate? Even if I want, can I do it? Is it possible? That is another issue. Then, Sonia Vihar has half a lakh population; Burari has two lakh population; Rithala has 2 lakh population, Molarband has one lakh population; Badarpur Extension A & B has one lakh population; Mithapur Sakthi Vihar has one and a half lakh population, it is a riverbed also; Mahavir Enclave has five lakh population; Vishwas Nagar has one lakh population; Bhagwan Nagar has one lakh population. There are many areas like this. The people are living in these areas for years. As someone has said, they have electricity connection, drinking water connection and also other facilities provided by respective civic agencies and the Government day-to-day. This is one side of the picture. The other side of the picture is that. Some people are saying: "What is happening to these politicians? Delhi is the capital of the country. Delhi is our pride. They are destroying the beauty by encouraging unauthorized construction and allowing 20 feet road. They are allowing people to come and occupy land and then demand regularization. Since they are all politicians, they try to regularize it". This view is also there. As someone has rightly said, I am not denying it but, at the same time, we belong to different parties and are here in Parliament to serve people. We have to go by the general view. But, at the same time, on a basic principle of public order and a civic order, we have to create awareness among the people, and then take people also along with us. As Shri Deepender was telling in the morning about bulldozer and all, there is an emotive issue involved in that. In this deep winter, can anybody with common sense try to remove people even if there is a Court order? They should have gone to the Tribunal and explained to them by saying: "Sir, we are in the end of November. It is very cold in Delhi." Sir, sometimes I feel odd to be in Delhi and the dress which I am wearing is not to my liking. I feel uncomfortable. I am comfortable like you, Sir, in our own traditional dress; with shirt and dhoti we feel elated and happy also. Even, Shri Kharge ji also would feel happy in the traditional dress. The problem is this. Can you allow health to be affected? In Delhi, suddenly, at times, the temperature comes down. In such a situation, if somebody goes and removes people and put them on road, naturally there will be reaction. I do admit it. But the other side, as I told you, is that we have to regulate the growth. Otherwise, we will have only slums around; we have unauthorized colonies and then we will face a situation where people will say: ^^fnYyh D;k gS] us'kuy dSfiVy D;k gS] what is this country? They do not have any minimum standard." Sir, the other day I was in Spain. I was landing from the flight. I saw from the flight the Barcelona city. When I was about to land, I saw one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight lanes on every side. They are all with similar dimensions. They have planned it. It is not that they have not developed. They have developed also but at the same time they have preserved their ancient heritage, culture and also retained their architecture. They have carried out improvements by retaining their architecture and at the same they made changes. We have to really create awareness 36 among the people in this country also and then slowly try to implement the rules and regulations. For that, you need time. I do not want to get into any blame game; there is no meaning in that and no purpose will be served.

No purpose would, be served by saying 'who is responsible for this haphazard growth of Delhi, how many years you have ruled, how many years we have ruled.' The point is to accept the reality. Shri Tathagata Satpathy had asked as to what was the urgency. He is not here now. He said, it is being done because the elections are round the corner. It is not because of elections. If we do not extend it further beyond 31st December, 2014, the next day, sealing, removal of encroachments, unauthorised and irregular colonies will start. There will be hue and cry in Delhi. There would be a massive human problem. Some hon. Member was telling that people have come from distant places like Kerala, Tamil Nadu, etc. So, Delhi is a mini India. People from different parts of the country came here and are settling here. They do not have adequate means of livelihood. Initially, they tried to stay in some Government places and then from the Government places, they tried to move to better housing facilities.

Sir, Meenakashiji was telling that there was no proper colonisation. There were no private people coming forward to develop colonies initially, and the Government was going slow — whichever Government was there. So, the Government does not provide housing. There is no adequate housing. There is a shortage of housing in Delhi as well as in the entire country. But the private people have not come forward, with the result, people have settled haphazardly in different parts of Delhi. That is the reality of the situation. That being the case, after so much of introspection, internal consultation, I have come to the conclusion that there is no way other than extending the date. That is the background. I want to be frank with the House. I am also doing it with a heavy heart. Some people,may criticise me tomorrow. Some people may appreciate me; others may criticise me saying that 'during this man's period, this has been extended by three years and this haphazard situation has continued'. Even if you have the magic wand, it is not easy to do all these things. Finalisation of master plan, regularisation of unauthorised colonies, taking care of the environmental aspects, and all are all not the easy things to do. Then, there are three Municipal Councils. We have NDMC. We have DDA. We have National Capital Region Board about which Deependra Hoodaji was telling that it must have more teeth and power. I am happy that he has realised it now because this Board periodically meets and passes some resolutions, which are not binding on States. So, if a Board presided over by a Minister passes a resolution and if the others do not accepts it or do not act upon it, it has no meaning. So, definitely, the Board has to be given more teeth, but that can be done only in consultation with the stakeholders including those from the nearby States — Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan. I have to take all of them into confidence before going further into this. 37

Sir, what is the time at my disposal? I am only seven months old — not in age but in this Ministry. Frankly, I am also trying to understand things. I always believe that the Ministers, politicians and people in public life must go on — earn, earn, earn, no — learn, learn, learn. That is the real thing. So, that being the case, I am trying to learn. I think, Meenakashiji has also told about Jagmohanji. He is a different man. He has a vision, he has a clarity. He had the dynamism at that time in that age. He was able to do certain things. But otherwise, dealing with problems of Delhi, is like dealing with the country, I must confess it in this House. I have been studying it. Sir, there is a paucity of time. I thought I must get some more time so that we — my officers, all the seven MPs of Delhi, and other interested parties — should take all these inputs. Our hon. Member from Haryana, Deependraji made certain suggestions; an MP from Uttar Pradesh, Shri Kanwar Singh Tanwar had also made his suggestions; and then, an hon. Member from Rajasthan also made his points. So, we should take all these inputs and then go for a comprehensive master plan. Mr. Dushyant Singh was suggesting certain things. We have to take care of all these aspects and then finalise the master plan. It is not that easy. Even if you have intellect, even if you are ready to work hard, it is not that easy to do things. Sir, somebody was saying, can you allow vertical construction in the farmhouses? If it is allowed, it cannot be a farmhouse at all. Its beauty would be lost. Already, some people have mishandled it and some people have gone for extra constructions etc. That is another issue. So, any action you take, there will be reaction. I was discussing with my ministerial colleague, Harsh Vardhan Ji. Harsh Vardhan Ji represents the other side. The Delhi middle class and the educated people have a different view about this. But the poor people, the lower middle class, the working class and the people, who have come from different parts of the country, have a different view. So, you have to marry somewhere. That is the effort I am making. Someone asked me, "Can you give an assurance that you will not come to this House for further extension?" I hope so. By 2017, this issue has to be resolved, to the extent possible, to the satisfaction of one and all. I will try to definitely work in that direction of not coming back to this House for further extension. I will do my best. This much assurance I can give you. I do not know what exactly it will happen at all but at the same time I have the confidence that with the cooperation of the Members from different sides, we will try to do it. But the Master Plan has to be completed by 2015. You cannot wait till 2017 for completion of the Master Plan. The finalisation of the Master Plan has to be done at the earliest. Once the Master Plan is finalised, then we must go for implementation. Also, with regard to the issue that was raised about generation of black money, this is another issue. The point is, the moment you allow regularisation and the moment you allow people to sell or purchase their properties, there will be some transactions. In those transactions, definitely, money also will change hands. That being the case, some money should come for the development of Delhi city. That 38 should be in white. So, how do you go about it? That is also an important aspect on which we have to really show interest. Sir, certain important points were made by the hon. Members because it is a very serious subject. Shri Parvesh Sahib Singh Verma said that 25-30 lakh people are going to be affected by this decision either way. I agree with him. That is why, the Government has taken it on top priority. Then, with regard to the background of Delhi, I am happy Deepender Ji has recalled the background of Delhi. Sometimes, I feel, instead of Delhi, it should have been either Indraprastha or Hastinapura. Some such historical name should have been more appropriate for this city. I am not proposing anything. Do not worry. Tomorrow, again you will be saying, we want Adjournment Motion. Venkaiah Naidu wants to change the name. This is there. We should always feel proud of our ancestors, our heritage and culture. As he said rightly VksD;ks ds ckn fnYyh cM+k 'kgj gSA Shanghai and all other cities come next. If that being the case, you have to see that Delhi's unique character and also its beauty are maintained, to the extent possible. So, we will definitely make efforts in that direction. Time bound regularisation also has been suggested. The hon. Members also said that we should not look at Delhi in isolation. Yes, we must go for a comprehensive plan for the entire NCR region. I agree with our hon. Members. I will keep it in mind while finalising the Master Plan. Then, with regard to giving more powers to the NCR Planning Board, I welcome that suggestion. I will keep that also in mind. Then, with regard to the suggestion of Madam Maragatham and what she said, though it is not directly connected with the Bill, it is a reality. A lot of people, who have come from other parts of the country, do not have Aadhaar card; they do not have ration card; and they do not have the other means here. A special drive has to be taken up to take care of them because I know people coming from Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh and the North-East do not have anybody here to depend. So, definitely, those people have to be given a helping hand by the administration. I have already told my Ministry to give a special treatment to the people who have come from far off places. Then, their educational needs, their cultural aspirations and their other requirements have to be taken care of. That is why, the Government is a little liberal in giving Tamil Education Society, Bengal Education Society or even Telugu Education Society a number of schools. Recently, the Kannada people also met me. In this connection, I would also like to tell the House that we have to respect the heroes of different regions. So, I take the House into confidence and then say that recently I suggested to them that near the Karnataka Bhavan, the Metro Station has to be named after Sir Mokshagundam Visvesvaraya Metro Railway Station. That has been the suggestion and it has been accepted. Then, another one is about Shrimati Durgabai Deshmukh, great freedom fighter. Kharge Ji will be knowing better. Shrimati Deshmukh is the first Finance Minister's wife and also a woman reformer. 39

One metro railway station is going to be named after her name. These are all small things. But this will really send a message that Delhi takes care of everybody and then remembers all the national heroes, who have contributed their might for social reforms, for freedom movement or for other activities in the country. Then, there are 1200 and plus unauthorised colonies in Delhi. What you are going to do with regard to unauthorised colonies is another issue. I can take the House into confidence because nothing is secret that is engaging my attention. I have already held a discussion with the Lt. Governor. I held discussion with the Chief Secretary. I held discussion with different agencies of Delhi Government. I also held discussions with my Minister and then six Members of Parliament. I also held discussion with other people. I am in touch with the Law Department and the Legislative Department. The Government is moving in the direction of regularising those colonies where poor people have been living for years together. That also is unwell. The final details can be given only after the final contours are adopted and accepted by relevant authorities. Certain things are to be done by Delhi Government. Certain things have to be done by Central Government. So, keeping that in mind, we are moving in that direction. I want to share this with our hon. Members. Prof. Saugata Roy said that there is a lopsided development in Delhi. I do agree with him. With regard to DDA and with regard to L&DO, there has to be one point of guidance for them. If there are two different agencies, definitely there will be some practical problem. I will discuss it with the hon. Prime Minister and also with my colleagues and try to find out a solution at the earliest. Many people have suggested me to take a final decision in respect of unauthorised colonies. I have told you that we are going to take a final decision at the earliest. With regard to J.J. colonies and valuation of the land and stopping of the black money, I have already mentioned that it will also attract our attention. dqN yksxksa us dgk gS fd ;g leL;k dsoy fnYyh dh ugha gS] cfYd iwjs ns'k dh gSA exj dsUnz ljdkj ns'k esa vyx&vyx 'kgjksa ds fy, dkuwu ugha cuk ldrh gSA fnYyh ;wfu;u VsfjVjh vkSj ns'k dh jkt/kkuh Hkh gSA blfy, ge bfuf'k;sfVo ysdj dkuwu cuk jgs gSaA ckdh bykdksa esa ogka dh izns'k ljdkjsa ogka ds jsxqys'ku ds ckjs esa /;ku nsdj dke djsaA Urban Development is a State subject. We will only give broad guidelines and broad models. But the final decision has to be taken by urban local bodies and the State Government. Legislation is the job of the State Government and other regulations are done by local bodies. Some hon. Member said that if the Government is not able to provide basic amenities to the poor people, then what will happen? It is our endeavour to see that basic amenities are provided to the poor people. The poor of this country have primary right over the land and also over the resources. That is very clear. They are our brothers. Irrespective of their caste, creed, sex, religion and religions, they are our people. Some Members talk about the basic amenities, particularly public transport. Yesterday, we discussed it also. There are more than 80 lakh plus vehicles in Delhi. You cannot go on adding vehicles. The problem is that adding vehicles also has 40 become a form of prestige. In some families there is a car for each member of the family. If they have wealth, we have no problem. It is not the question of wealth alone. It is a question of congestion you are creating on the roads of Delhi putting the common man to hardship. That is a big problem. This is not acceptable. So, we must have a comprehensive transport policy on MRTS, BRTS and also metro rail. Metro rail is the need of the hour. But it is also cost prohibitive. With regard to BRT we had some mixed experience earlier. But, at the same time, there are some good examples also. I am told about Ahmedabad and Jaipur. Some people are also talking about indoor system. I do not know what exactly they are talking about. We have to take their experience also because it is for the National Capital Delhi. Before moving further, I will study those experiences and then try to more forward. Everyone, particularly, the Delhi Members and people who are aside with Delhi including Shri Bhagwant Mann and other people have suggested that this cut-off date has to be extended. Since the last two days I have been holding consultations and discussions with regard to the extension of the cut-off date. As of now, the cut-off date is 2007. As I was discussing earlier, what is the reality? Can you remove people who have settled after 2007 and who have been living in that place by 2014? In the original Bill it is 2007. So, Deputy-Speaker, Sir, with your permission, I want to move an amendment also. Seven of the Delhi Members have given a notice for moving amendment for extending the cut-off date from February or March of 2007 to end of 2014, but I am willing to go by the collective wisdom of the Members of the House and I want it to be extended by 1st June, 2014. Another issue raised is that it is supposed to be the greenest Capital. What will happen if you do this? This is a big question, and I have no readymade answer to this. Let me be frank that I have no readymade answer to this. Some time back, I developed the habit of coming by Metro, and whenever I come from outside I get on to a Metro and travel happly. It take 18 minutes to my house and the amount of greenery in the initial entry point really makes you very happy as everthing is green and nothing else is seen, and the moment you cross the greenery and come to the other areas—because the train will be moving—you will see what is happening. It is a pathetic condition. But at the same time, the planers, rules and the people at that time could not prevent it, and there may be valid reasons for it also. This has become a reality, and that is why this extension is being accepted. Otherwise, Shri Dushyant, as a youngester who had education abroad, was going by the real conditions in India. We have to accept the reality and try to take care of it. But we should also slowly evolve a method, and I have three things in mind that everyone in Delhi—in the coming days—should follow, namely, rainwater harvesting must be made a must, solar lighting must be made a must; LED lighting must be made a must, and planting trees, growing it, and then supporting them should also become a part of our campaign. This campaign will succeed only if it becomes a people's campaign, and secondly, it should be part of the urban plan approval by the Municipal Authorities. Madam Jayalalithaa, the former Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu, some time back had made it mandatory to have rainwater harvesting, I can tell you about it as 41

I frequently go to that side. My daughter also lives there. So, I have the experience. Rainwater harvesting has helped Chennai, which was starving without water earlier. There are some more examples of other States also about rainwater harvesting. The watershed movement in Gujarat has caught up the imagination as also the housing projects in Maharashtra even by earlier Congress Governments also. There are examples of housing projects of Maharashtra and Gujarat. Maharashtra has just now come to BJP, but earlier it was held by Congress for a long time. So, these are some shining examples from where we can take clues and try to implement them in our respective areas also. ....(Interruptions) SHRI N.K. PREMA CHANDRAN (KOLLAM): You did not mention the example of Kerala. SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU: Kerala is God's own country, I am thankful to the people of kerala that they are not destroying the nature. I salute them because if you go to Kerala, there is no match to Kerala becuase on the one side there is greenery and on the other there is water, and whenever you call for water, it will come the evening. SHRI KODIKUNNIL SURESH (MAVELIKKARA): You should come and stay there. SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU: In your Idukki forest? SHRI KODIKUNNIL SURESH (MAVELIKKARA):`26 But your party is not there. SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU: You are trying your best to help my party also. One meaningful suggestion that has been given with regard to putting it online is this. I firmly believe that we must try to reduce human involvement to the extent possible and try to make online application, sanction, and renewal. As regards information, everybody must be in a position to access what is the information, what its present situation is; where does his application stand; and whether it has been sanctioned or not. That will really eliminate corruption to the maximum possible extent. I do not say that it will be totally eliminated because in this country there is no dearth of intelligence, as far as the corrupt fellows are concerned. If you come up with some idea, they will come up with some counter-idea next day morning.That is the situation. At the same time, I totally agree with the suggestion. I have already started implementing it in CPWD. The details of more than 2,500 works of CPWD have been put online now. One can visit the site to find out at what stage it is, why there is delay, what the scheduled time is and what the scheduled time of completion is, etc. One can see these details on the site. I have told the authorities that within six months the entire CPWD activities must go online. I know what the impression of people is about CPWD. Keeping that in mind, we are trying to cleanse the system. The hon. Members have given suggestions with regard to the holistic Master Plan, the National Capital Regional Planning Board being strengthened, regularisation 42 of unauthorised colonies, and consultations with the elected Governments. However, the reason why I am not taking action on all these things is that I want to have an elected Government in Delhi. After all, they represent the people better than us. They know the ins and outs of Delhi and they have the full knowledge. The Members of the Legislative Assembly of Delhi and the elected Chief Minister or other Ministers will have full understanding and they know the local situation better than the Central Government, though the Central Government as on today can take care of the State also because there is no elected Government; the Lieutenant Governor also works in unison with the Government of India. Digitisation of all maps is an important issue. I have already given direction to digitise all maps and put them online. I hope my officers will be able to complete it at the earliest. Three MCDs have already said that they are in an advanced stage. DDA and NDMC have also been directed to do it by 1st January, 2015. I told the DDA that everything should be online. DDA is again another white elephant, which is what people say. However, I want to make DDA to live up to the expectations of the people. That is why I have told them to start doing this. I want to share another important information with the people. Some time back, one of the prominent newspapers of Delhi, I have no hesitation in taking the name of that newspaper, The Hindustan Times, conducted debate among various well-meaning people where a lot of professionals have come together. They gave certain suggestions. On those suggestions, I had an interaction and now I have appointed a committee headed by my Secretary, Urban Development, Shri Shankar Aggarwal with representatives of different Ministries because Delhi's development is linked with National Highways, Railways, Environment Ministry, Defence Ministry, the Delhi Government and the DDA. All these departments are involved. So, we have appointed a committee and that committee held a number of sittings. They have now given a report on decongesting Delhi, which is also placed online. I would request all the Members and also the general public to please see it online and if you have any suggestions with regard to decongesting Delhi, you are welcome to give your suggestions. After receiving the suggestions, the Government will finalise the decongestion plan. I am planning to have a meeting with other colleague Ministers also because the Prime Minister said, "Instead of talking to each other on files, talk together in person." So, I will be convening a meeting of my colleagues also and then we will be able to finalise the plan for decongestion of Delhi. I will take the advice of the Haryana Government, the Rajasthan Government and also the Uttar Pradesh Government in this regard to the extent the areas fall in their jurisdiction because it is interconnected with Delhi. Keeping that in mind, we will do it. If the House agrees, afterwards I will move the amendments. Thank you. (ends) HON. DEPUTY-SPEAKER: The question is: "That the Bill to amend the National Capital Territory of Delhi Laws (Special Provisions) Second Act, 2011, be taken into consideration." The motion was adopted. HON. DEPUTY SPEAKER: The House will now take up clause-by-clause 43 consideration of the Bill. Clauses 2 to 4 HON. DEPUTY-SPEAKER: The question is: "That clauses 2 to 4 stand part of the Bill." The motion was adopted. Clauses 2 to 4 were added to the Bill. Clause 5 Amendments made: Page 2, after line 5, insert— "(a) in sub-section (1),. in clause (c), for the words, figures and letters "up to the 8th day of February, 2007", the words, figures and letters "up to the 1st day of June, 2014" shall be substituted; (aa) in sub-section (2), in clause (ii), for the words, figures and letters "up to the 8th day of February, 2007", the words, figures and letters "up to the 15th day of June, 2014" shall be substituted; (1) Page 2, line 6, for "(a)", substitute "(aaa)" (2) (Shri M. Venkaiah Naidu) HON. DEPUTY SPEAKER: The question is: "That clause 5, as amended, stand part of the Bill. The motion was adopted. Clause 5, as amended, was added to the Bill. Clause 1, the Enacting Formula and the Title were added to the Bill. SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU: I beg to move: "That the Bill, as amended, be passed." HON. DEPUTY SPEAKER: The question is: "That the Bill, as amended, be passed. The motion was adopted. SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU: I would like to thank the entire House for their support. APPENDIX XIII GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO. 3980 ANSWERED ON 17.12.2014 Government Departments at One Place 3980. SHRI RAHUL SHEWALE: SHRI P. NAGARAJAN: SHRI VINAYAK BHAURAO RAUT: Will the Minister of URBAN DEVELOPMENT be pleased to state: (a) whether the suggestions have been received from various quarters to House all the Government departments/buildings at a single place so as to ensure efficient delivery and better intra-departmental coordination and also to curtail unnecessary expenditure, bringing speed in working and decision making and if so, the details thereof; (b) whether the Government has prepared any roadmap in this regard and if so, the details thereof; (c) whether the Government has identified the place for the purpose; and (d) if so, the details thereof and the progress made in this regard so far ? ANSWER THE MINISTER OF STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT (SHRI BABUL SUPRIYO): (a) & (b) Ministry of Urban Development, Directorate of Estate had received a proposal for Construction of Common Secretariat building from Department of Personnel and Training and a Meeting was held on this issue under the Chairmanship of Cabinet Secretary on 7.11.2014. (c) No, not yet. (d) Question does not arise in view of (c).

44 APPENDIX XIV

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO. 255 ANSWERED ON 25.02.2015 Land on Lease to Hotels 255. SHRI BHEEMRAO B. PATIL: Will the Minister of URBAN DEVELOPMENT be pleased to state: (a) whether Delhi Development Authority (DDA) and Land Development Office (L&DO) has allotted land on lease to hotels including 5 star hotels and if so, the details thereof; (b) whether DDA has renewed the lease of some of the hotels; (c) if so, the details thereof and the terms and conditions in this regard; and (d) the amount paid to the Government by these hotels during each of the last three years and the current year, hotel-wise? ANSWER THE MINISTER OF STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT (SHRI BABUL SUPRIYO): (a) Yes, Madam. The details pertaining to the hotels which have been allotted land on lease by Delhi Development Authority (DDA) and the Land and Development Office (L&DO) are at Annex-I and Annex-II, respectively. (b) No, Madam. DDA has informed that the hotels listed in Annex-I were allotted land on perpetual lease basis. (c) Does not arise in view of (b) above. (d) The amount received during the last three years and current year on account of allotment of land on lease to hotels by L&DO is given in Annex-II. The details of amount received on account of land attotted on lease to hotels by DDA are being collected.

45 ANNEX. I Details regarding land allotted by L&DO to the hotels as referred to in part (a) of the reply to the Question No. 255 regarding land on lease to hotels asked by Shri Bheemrao B. Patil, MP.

Sl.No. Name of Hotels Amount received during the last three years and current year 1. Hotel Ashok Rs. 9,03,430.00 2. Hotel Samrat Rs. 17,14,665.00 3. Hotel Janpath — 4. Hotel Bharat Rs. 1,31,73,633.00 5. Hotel Le-Meridian Rs. 74,74,896.00 6. Hotel Taj Man Singh Rs. 6,86,100.00 7. Hotel Taj Palace Rs. 78,40,800.00 8. Hotel Mourya Sheraton Rs. 71,46,051.00 9. Hotel Oberoi Rs. 1,18,46,308.00 10. Hotel Park Rs. 27,10,972.00 11. Hotel Vikram Rs. 1,44,120.00 12. Hotel Claridges Rs. 3,48,67,856.00 13. Hotel Imperial Rs. 35,720.00 14. Hotel Shangri-La Rs. 1,31,381.00 15. Hotel The Royal Plaza Rs. 4,25,89,541.00 16. Hotel Lodhi — 17. Hotel Qutab Rs. 1,42,81,314.00

46 ANNEX. II Details regarding land allotted by DDA to the hotels as referred to in part (a) of the reply to the Question No. 255 regarding land on lease to hotels asked by Shri Bheemrao B. Patil, MP

Sl. No. Location Amount received during the last three years and current year 1. Nehru Place-Park Royal 2. Basant Lok, Vasant Vihar, Vasant Continental 3. New Friends Colony-Crown Plaza (Surya) 4. Rajendra Place-Sidhartha 5. Vasant Kunj, Ph.II Unison (Grant Hyat) 6. Saket Hotel Sheraton 7. Saket-Krishna Continental The details of amount received by DDA are being collected. 8. Pitampura-Park City 9. A-4 Distt. Centre, Saket, New Delhi- Service Apartment (DLF) 10. A-3, Distt. Centre, Saket, New Delhi- Service Apartment (Select) 11. Community Centre, Pitam Pura 12. District Centre, Janak Puri, Janak Place 13. Rohini, Twin District Centre 14. Okhla 15. Motia Khan 16. Jasola 17. Jasola 18. A-1, District Centre, Saket, New Delhi- Service Apartment (DLF) 19. District Centre, Laxmi Nagar

47 APPENDIX XV GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO. 374 ANSWERED ON 25.02.2015 Incomplete JNNURM Projects 374. SHRI SATAV RAJEEV: SHRI RAJAN VICHARE: DR. HEENA VIJAY KUMAR GAVIT: SHRI SHRIRANG APPA BARNE: SHRI ADHALRAO PATIL SHIVAJIRAO: SHRI DHARMENDRA YADAV: SHRI DHANANJAY MAHADIK: SMT. RAKSHATAI KHADSE: SHRI ANANDRAO ADSUL: SHRI T.G. VENKATESH BABU : SHRI SIRAJUDDIN AJMAL: SHRI RAMSINH RATHWA: SMT. SANTOSH AHLAWAT:

Will the Minister of URBAN DEVELOPMENT be pleased to state:

(a) whether more than 50 per cent of projects sanctioned under Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JNNURM) are lying incomplete;

(b) if so, the details thereof, project and State-wise and the reasons therefor;

(c) whether the Government has taken, or proposes to take action against the contractors and officials responsible in this regard;

(d) if so, the details thereof and if not, the reasons therefor;

(e) whether the Government proposes to replace JNNURM with National Urban Development Mission (NUDM) or to launch JNNURM-II and if so, the details and salient features thereof;

(f) whether the Government proposes to introduce incentive and penalty clause under NUDM and if so, the details thereof; and

48 49

(g) whether the Government proposes to take up the incomplete project of JNNURM in the next phase and if so, the details thereof and if not, the reasons therefor? ANSWER THE MINISTER OF STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT (SHRI BABUL SUPRIYO): (a) & (b) Out of 1339 Projects sanctioned during the Mission Period under Urban Infrastructure Governance (UIG) Sub-Mission and Urban Infrastructure Development Schemes for Small, and Medium’ Town (UIDSSMT) of Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JNNURM), 705 projects have been physically completed so far that leads to 52.7%. 296 Projects have been sanctioned during Transition Phase of JNNURM i.e. from 01.04.2012 to 31.03.2014 which are at various stages of implementation. The Mission has recognized various issues in implementation of schemes being faced by the States and ULBs such as, land acquisition, sifting of utilities, lack of technical and human capacity, financial constraints, and prolonged legal and legislative process in implementing certain reforms, limited inter-and-intra-departmental coordination, etc. The details of incomplete projects is annexed. (c) & (d) The projects sanctioned under JNNURM are implemented by the States. However, mechanisms were worked out to ensure proper spending of public money. Subsequent installments of ACA for JNNURM Projects are released only after submission of Utilization Certificates (UCs) by the implementing agencies. In case of non-completion of reforms, which are integral part of JNNURM, 10% ACA is withheld till the needful is done by the State Government. (e) & (f) The Government is considering to launch a new National Urban Development Mission for 500 cities. Guidelines for this new mission are yet-to-be finalized. (g) The JNNURM ended on 31.03.2014. The Government decided that State Governments are required to complete the ongoing projects sanctioned upto 31st March, 2012 from their own resources. Projects sanctioned under Transition Phase of JNNURM are at various stages of implementation. ANNEX. List of ongoing Projects under UIG Sub-Component of JNNURM (Including Mission & Transition Phase)

Sl. Name of the Name of the City Project Title Sector Approved No. State Cost 12 3 4 5 6 1. Andhra Pradesh Hyderabad Remodelling of Storm Water Drainage Drainage/Storm 1,925.97 MURKINALA Secondary Drains Water Drains 2. Andhra Pradesh Hyderabad Remodelling of Storm Water Drainage Drainage/Storm 2,388.23 MURKINALA P-11, P-12 Water Drains

3. Andhra Pradesh Hyderabad Remodelling of Storm Water Drainage Drainage/Storm 2,921.00 50 KUKATPALLY (Begumpet) Nalla P7 Water Drains 4. Andhra Pradesh Hyderabad Balkapur Channel Drainage/Storm 2,222.41 Water Drains 5. Andhra Pradesh Hyderabad Road Widening on Outer Ring Road Urban Renewal 3,510.00 and Inner Ring Road under Charminar Pedestrianisation Project (Heritage) 6. Andhra Pradesh Hyderabad Rehabilitation and Strengthening of Sewerage Sewerage 24,690.00 system in Old City Area on South of Musi (in Zone 2 in catchments S7 to S11, S13 and S15) 7. Andhra Pradesh Hyderabad Musi campaign Musi Revitalisation project Urban Renewal 4,426.51 8. Andhra Pradesh Hyderabad implementation of Sewerage Master Plan in Sewerage 15,602.00 Seringampally Municipality of Hyderabad U.A. 9. Andhra Pradesh Hyderabad Refurbishment of existing feeder system including Water Supply 20,496.00 distribution network for 10 zones in Old Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad 10. Andhra Pradesh Hyderabad Commuter Amenity Centres (CAC) Other Urban 12,392.00 Transport 11. Andhra Pradesh Hyderabad Improvement of Storm Water Drainage Drainage/Storm 12,410.00 in Zone-I and II of MCH area Water Drains 12. Andhra Pradesh Hyderabad Comprehensive Water SupplyDistribution Network Water Supply 31,426.00 and implementation of sewerage master plan for identified priority zones of Rajendranagar Municipal circle of GHMC 13. Andhra Pradesh Vijayawada Providing under-ground drainage facilities Drainage/Storm 5,656.00 to the unserved areas Water Drains 51 14. Andhra Pradesh Vijayawada Storm Water Drainage System for uncovered Drainage/Storm 4,912.00 areas in Circle I, II, III and MG road Water Drains of VMC 15. Andhra Pradesh Vijayawada Augmentation of water supply utility in Water Supply 8,857.58 Vijayawada Municipal Corporation 16. Andhra Pradesh Vijayawada Bus Rapid Transport System for Vijayawada Mass Rapid 15,100.00 (i) MG Road (ii) Nujiveedu Road (iii) Eluru Transport Road (iv) Route No. 5 (v) S.N. Puram System Road (vi) Loop Road-15.18 Km. 17. Andhra Pradesh Vijayawada Formation of IRR connecting NH-9 and NH-5 Roads/Flyovers/ 7,424.00 inbetween the flyovers at Milk Project RoB and Ramvarappadu in Vijayawada City 52 17,815.00 24,444.00 24,074.00 18,508.00 4,793.48 45,170.00 8,349.00 2,329.00 5,805.00 ater Supply ater Supply Sewerage Sewerage Transport Management Management Km System - 45.20 ater Supply to Supply Water to Central northern part Visakhapatnam ransit System for Visakhapatnamransit System for Mass Rapid of Vijayawada city of Vijayawada Providing sewerage system city Visakhapatnam part of Augmentation of Drinking W the 32 peripheral areas of GVMC Refurbishment of distribution of Comprehensivewater supply system in North Eastern Zone in Municipal Visakhapatnam Area of Greater Central W Corporation scheme in old Supply Water Comprehensive city of Greater W Bus Rapid T Bus Rapid (i) Simhachalam Transit corridor including tunnel (ii) Pendurthi Transit Corridor Implementation of 24x7 water supply in left out areas Water Supply of south west sectors of central region of Greater Municipal Corporation (GVMC) Visakhapatnam Tirupati Management in Waste Solid Municipal Corporation Solid Waste Solid Waste Improvement ManagementWaste Solid Scheme Solid Waste da Sewerage for Providing isakhapatnam isakhapatnam isakhapatnam isakhapatnam isakhapatnam isakhapatnam Tirupati 20. Andhra Pradesh21. V Andhra Pradesh22. V Andhra Pradesh V 23. Andhra Pradesh V 24. Andhra Pradesh V 25. Andhra Pradesh V 26. Andhra Pradesh 1 218. Andhra Pradesh 319. Vijayawada Andhra Pradesh Vijayawa 4 5 6 53 2,470.26 1,315.43 6,896.45 42,698.00 3,355.72 9,594.34 9,128.50 3,516.71 28,094.00 3,695.40 1,155.81 Management Sewerage Transport Management Management ariff, Bodhgaya Phulwarish Khagul and Danapur Supply SchemeWater Phulwarisharif Supply SchemeWater Khagul SupplyWater Augmentation of Scheme for Danapur Improvement and augmentation of water Water Supply supply system at Patna City Supply ProjectWater Bodhgaya Sewarage scheme for Supply Water Nagar Panchayat Supply Water Supply Water Supply Water Improvement and creation of infrastructure forImprovement and creation of and parking urban transport including roads city Itanagar lot/spaces at JNNURM Mission Urban Other for Guwahati Management Waste Solid Supply Water Waste Proposal for South Guwahati Development Scheme in Guwahati Metropolitan Supply Water Area Solid Waste management forWaste Municipal Solid Patna town in Management Waste Integrated Solid Patna UA towns - Solid Waste Solid Waste Patna Patna Patna Patna Bodhgaya Bodhgaya Guwahati Guwahati Patna Patna Pradesh 32. Bihar 33. Bihar 34. Bihar 35. Bihar 36. Bihar 37. Bihar 27. Arunachal28. Assam Itanagar 29. Assam 30. Bihar 31. Bihar 54 24,544.00 9,716.00 8,818.00 9800.00 46,980.00 25,378.00 Transport Roads/Flyovers /RoB Roads/Flyovers /RoB basis New Delhi-Renewal Urban at Sewerage STP each Nilothi and Pappankalan areasTraffic Management plan for Around Civic centre JLN Marg, Minto Road, New Delhi. Construction of 3 additional clover leaves at Noida more flyover i/c slip road, bridges, footpath, cycle track and underpass. RUB & ROB at Railway Level Crossing Urban Other at Road No. 68 Near Nand Nagari. Development of multilevel underground unconven-tional parking at various locations under theand lots Parking jurisdiction of MCD (AL-Block, Shalimar Bagh, Shiv Market Pitampura, QU Pitampura, Central Market Malviya Nagar Village, Mohammadpur Vihar, Ashok spaces on PPP Market, PVR Basant Lok, PVR Saket, G-8 Rajouri C-4 Janakpuri, Garden, Block-10 Subhash Nagar, Ajmal Khan Park Karol Bagh, Krishna Market Kalkaji, Hauzarani, New Friends Colony, Jangpura Bhogal). Redevelopment Place, of Connaught Conservation Urban Renewal and Heritage Setting up of 20 MGD 40. Delhi41. Delhi Delhi 42. Delhi43. Delhi Delhi Delhi Delhi 1 238. Delhi 339. Delhi Delhi Delhi 4 5 6 55 135,771.00 14,861.00 5,120.00 23,300.00 16,510.00 15,226.00 98,071.00 97,000.00 Sewerage Roads/Flyovers /RoB basis basis Roads/Flyovers /RoB Roads/Flyovers /RoB Roads/Flyovers /RoB drains 3 major from Africafrom lots and Parking mprovement of road of 60 ft. ROW and above viz. Najafgarh, supplementary and Shahdara River. Yamuna for abatement of Pollution in Improvement and strengthening of roads of Improvement and strengthening Zone. Area Phase I &II, Central Okhla Indl. Nagar Covering of Nallah in Nauroji to Ring Road for proving parking/roadAvenue of MCD. cum parking under the jurisdiction Enclave road passingCovering of nallah from Press spaces on PPP Delhi, Panchsheelthrough Sheikh Sarai, Chiragh Parking lots and Andrews Ganj upto Enclave, Greater Kailash-I, Defence Colony for Ring Road behind Police Station spaces on PPP providing Parking/Road cum parking under the Jurisdiction of MCD. by providing RMC Pavement (Phase-I) in various zones of MCD. Re-modeling of SSBL (Saharanpur Samli BranchLine) drains in Shah. (N) Zone.Approaches over Construction of Bridge and its Drainage/Storm Down stream of existing Bridge Yamuna River Delhi. Wazirabad, at Alignment over Barapulla Nallah. Laying Interceptor Sewers along the Drains Water 44. Delhi45. Delhi46. Delhi Delhi Delhi Delhi 47. Delhi Delhi I 48. Delhi49. Delhi50. Delhi Delhi51. Delhi Delhi Delhi Delhi 56 362.25 7,121.83 46,931.31 23,541.00 11,672.10 3,336.48 2,773.69 3,552.37 1,137.35 9,637.67 Heritage Areas Transport System Sewerage Solid Waste Management Sewerage Ahmedabad Sewerage area of est AUDA est AUDA itage conservation for the city ofitage conservation for the city of Development TS Phase-II for Ahmedabad Municipal Ahmedabad TS Phase-II for Mass Rapid ater supply for Panaji city and surrounding areasater supply for Panaji city and Supply Water ater Supply System for Jodhpur ward inater Supply System for Navrangpura Stadium and Supply Water Supply Water ater recycling and reuse project for Panaji. of the city of under the jurisdiction of corporation Panaji at Goa. Corporation - 30.50 Km Sewerage Network of W Ahmedabad UA. Ahmedabad. Management in Waste Solid Automation (SCADA based) of the watersupply system. Automation (SCADA based) of sewerage system. Ahmedabad City. Supply Water Ahmedabad city. in Wards Juna Vadaj City -Providing 60 MLD tertiary treatment plant for Narol Industries. Ahmedabad BR Ahmedabad Ahmedabad Ahmedabad Ahmedabad AhmedabadAhmedabad W Ahmedabad W W 1 252. Goa 353. Goa54. Panaji Gujarat 4 Panaji55. Gujarat 56. Her Gujarat 57. W Gujarat 58. Gujarat 59. Gujarat 560. Gujarat 6 61. Gujarat 57 4,172.54 16,743.43 46,902.00 20,109.67 4,913.74 5,723.00 9,494.68 16,789.88 867.00 7,542.00 19,195.12 7,296.66 Management Mass Rapid Transport System Sewerage Management Drainage/Storm Phase-III Rajkot City. Sewerage treatment plant ransmission line and storage reservoir for Supply Water thening of Solid Waste ManagementWaste thening of Solid Solid Waste ater Supply system for New East Zone areas of Supply Water ater Supply Distribution system for South-East Supply Water Zone & South-West West ater Supply System for Supply Water trengthening of Solid Waste Management of trengthening of Solid Waste Solid Waste Rajkot. Surat Municipal Corporation. for Surat-29.90 Km. Development of BRTS Zone areas of Surat Municipal Corporation (SMC). water supply system of east zone of Surat. Augmentation of Karanj Sewerage under east drainage zone of Surat. of Surat Municipal Corporation. City (a) storm, water drainage Sector (b) Vadodara in water suply sector. (Phase-I). and Underground Drainage—Phase-II and STP).(Part-1) (Sewage Disposal Network for Sewerage System Phase-II, Part-II for Rajkot.Augmentation of water supply Drains Water Supply Water adodara Basic Services to developing rehabilitation of Kaans Supply Water 67. Gujarat68. Gujarat Surat69. Gujarat Surat70. Gujarat71. W Surat Gujarat72. Surat Gujarat73. Surat Gujarat W Surat T WTP, V W 62. Gujarat63. Gujarat64. Rajkot Gujarat65. Gujarat66. Rajkot Gujarat Rajkot Streng Rajkot Rajkot S 58 2,059.26 12,385.32 2,631.04 11,180.65 49,349.00 1,604.00 1,009.06 1,050.62 12,923.00 2,032.03 13,292.00 Sewerage Management Roads/Flyovers /RoB Management Sewerage area, Sewerage left out Zone III Shimla. for Sewerage ehsil Distt. ater Supply at Porbandar. Supply Water Division A of Greater Jammu City. A Division aste Management for Shimla. Solid Waste of Vadodara City. of Vadodara Supply for VadodaraWater Augmentation of City. Supply Water Underground Drainage (Sewerage) city. Project for Porbandar mission Supply forAugmentation of Water Haryana. Faridabad Town, Construction of widening and lowering of existing Auckland House School (Including tunnel near Supply construction of approach bridge). Water ManagementWaste Sanitary Landfill site for Solid T plant at village Bhariyal, Solid Waste Comprehensive Sewerage Scheme of Greater Jammu. A Division Comprehensive Sewerage Scheme for Comprehensive Sewerage Scheme for (Sector I) of Greater Srinagar. ndarndar W Augmentation of adodaraAjwa Zone Supply in Water Supplementary DPR for Water Supply ododara ShimlaShimla Solid W Shimla Srinagar Pradesh Pradesh Pradesh Kashmir KashmirKashmir Phase II of 1 274. Gujarat 375. Gujarat76. Gujarat V 77. Gujarat V 78. 4 Haryana Porba 79. Porba Himachal 80. Faridabad Himachal 81. Himachal 82. 5 Jammu &83. 6 Jammu & Jammu Jammu 84. Jammu & 59 28,839.15 5,139.43 30,225.91 36,585.00 5,585.90 3,336.24 12,100.00 14,837.00 9,197.29 42,089.00 10,593.00 Management Sewerage Management Management Management Drainage/Storm Drainage/Storm water System Secondary storm and Secondary Agglomeration. Water Drainage Water ban ted Solid Waste Management ProjectWaste ted Solid Solid Waste Supply Project for Ranchi. Water Supply Waste Management.Waste Solid Waste ater Supply Scheme for Tangnar (Srinagar).ater Supply Scheme for Tangnar Water Supply ugmentation of Water Supply for Zone IV of for Zone IV Supply Water ugmentation of Supply Water Sewerage and Storm Sewerage and Storm for Zone-I. Supply to Dhanbad.Water Improvement of Management.Solid Waste Supply Water for Jamshedpur Ur Solid Waste Greater Srinagar including Central Water Greater Srinagar including Central Facilities. Testing Management.Solid Waste Solid Waste drains in Bangalore city at Vrushabhavathi valleyVrushabhavathi drains in Bangalore city at including Kethamaranahalli and arkavathi minor valley I and Kathriguppa minor valley Drains Water III (3 DPRs). Remodelling of Primary storm water drains in Bangalore City,Challaghatta valley. Drains Water lore Remodelling of Primary and SrinagarSrinagar A Srinagar W Kashmir Kashmir Kashmir 89. Jharkhand90. Jharkhand Ranchi91. Jharkhand92. Jharkhand Ranchi 93. Dhanbad Jharkhand Solid Dhanbad 94. Karnataka Jamshedpur Banga Integra 85. Jammu & 86. Jammu & 87. Jammu & 88. Jharkhand Ranchi Water 95. Karnataka Bangalore 60 12,858.00 26,998.00 17,675.00 3,008.00 1,876.36 12,517.00 4,153.80 2,260.62 13,657.00 8,789.00 ater Drains ater Drains Drainage/Storm Drainage/Storm Sewerage Roads/Flyovers /RoB Drainage/Storm Roads/Flyovers /RoB Sewerage ation water Restoration Restor and Sewerage and Road of Drainage/Storm in Sewerage Secondary storm Secondary storm Replacement CMC. W age System and Road of Primary and drains in Bangalore City, Koramangala valley.drains in Bangalore City, Hebbal valley.water drains in Bangalore City, Drains Water Environmental Action Plan system. Rehabilitation of existing sewerage Drains Water junction. Underground Drainage works Kengeri. Underground Drainage works Byatarayanpura. W for erstwhile R.R. Nagar CNR Rao junction. for erstwhile Dasarahalli City Municipal Council (Drainage Zone 7 & 8). Underground Sewerage System Road Restoration for K.R. Puram City Municipal Council (Drainage Zone III). lore and Remodelling of Primary lore Underground Sewerage System KarnatakaKarnataka Bangalore Bangalore Karnataka Bangalore Underground Drain Karnataka Bangalore Construction of Underpass at Ring Road- Karnataka Banga Karnataka Bangalore 1 296. Karnataka 3 Banga 4 5 6 97. Karnataka98. Karnataka Bangalore99. Karnataka Bangalore 100. Remodelling Bangalore101. Anjaneya Construction of bridge at Gali 102. 103. 104. 105. 61 11,018.00 23, 175.00 10,270.55 3,479.54 17,917.75 21,716.52 9,220.00 2,783.00 38,460.00 Sewerage Drainage/Storm Roads/Flyovers/ Drainage/Storm Restoration System facilities and Road ater Drainage ater Supply Project for Mysore Kabini Supply Water for Mahadevapura City Municipal Council for Mahadevapura City Municipal (Drainage Zone III). Providing underground Drainage and Road restoration in erstwhileCouncil. Bommanahali City Municipal Supply lieu of existing for Cauvery Water Halli. T.K. Scheme (CWSS) at Water Auditing of Bengaluru Systems for Drains Water Supply System. Supply Distribution Network,Water Remodelling of Automation and Integrated Management System Water Supply for Mysore City Upgradation of outer Ring Road at MysoreRiver WasteIntegrated Municipal Solid StrategyW Remodelling of Storm in Mysore Solid Waste ROBs Management Drains Water lore Underground Sewerage System Mysore Mysore MysoreMysore W Mysore Karnataka Banga KarnatakaKarnataka Bangalore Karnataka BangaloreKarnataka Bangalore Plant in Treatment Water Construction of New Supply Water Karnataka Providing Bulk Flow Metering & MonitoringKarnataka Water Supply Karnataka Karnataka 106. 107. 108. 109. 110. 111. 112. 113. 114. 62 330.00 21,399.97 2,698.75 1,518.25 982.58 1,462.65 20,117.00 8,812.00 978.00 7,841.00 3,897.00 Roads/Flyovers/ Roads/Flyovers/ Roads/Flyovers/ Roads/Flyovers/ Management Drainage/Storm Sewerage Drainage Central Zone Water Water Core Heritage Areas aste Management for Kochi Solid Waste upply System to Kochi Part-I Supply Water ding Surface ater Management through surfaceSupply Water and Rainwater Harvesting at Sri Chamarajendra Zoological Gardens Supply in Mysore CityWater Providing 24x7 Construction of Grade Separator at JSS-Nanjangud Road Junction Water Supply Construction of Grade Separator at Hunsur Road & ORR JunctionConstruction of Grade Separator at KRS Road & ORR JunctionConstruction of Grade Separator at Bangalore-Mysore Road & ORR Junction ROBs ROBs ROBs Area of KochiSystem of Central ROBs Sewerage Scheme for Wards covering six Divisions and (Nos. 43, 49, 50, 51, 54 and 56) of Kochi Drains Water Heritage and Urban Renewal atHeritage and Urban Renewal Heritage of Development Mysore W Mysore Mysore Mysore Mysore Mysore KochiKochiKochi S Water Kochi Solid W Upgra Mysore Karnataka Karnataka Karnataka Karnataka Karnataka Karnataka Kerala Kerala Kerala Kerala Karnataka 116. 117. 118. 119. 120. 121. 122. 123. 124. 125. 1 2115. 3 4 5 6 63 10,964.00 8,109.61 4,039.00 21,541.00 12,115.00 2,456.00 3,057.00 27,444.00 41,545.64 8,276.00 Roads/Flyovers/ Sewerage Solid Waste Drainage/Storm Drains Water Transport System Mass Rapid Transport System in Drainage/Storm (42.19 km. long) torm Water Drainage torm Water Supplementary DPR, Bhopal id Waste Management in Thiruvananthapuram Management in Waste id Road Improvement and Bridge Construction Road Improvement and Bridge at Kochi SupplyImprovement of Water Improvement of S for Improvement of Sewerage Schemes F&G Block,Extension of Sewerage System Supply Water Rehabilitation of the Sewerage Systems, Procurement of Sewer Cleaning Machines, for Area, STP Attukal Sewerage System for Sewerage Govt. Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram ROBs Municipal Area ochi Bhopal Drain) Water Channelisation of Nallah (Storm Thiruvanantha- puram Thiruvanantha- puramThiruvanantha- puramThiruvanantha- puram Zone-II Area of Thiruvananthapuram Thiruvananthapuram Municipal Corporation Thiruvananthapuram and Southern area of Thiruvanantha-puram Drains Water Sol BhopalBhopal Corridor (New Market to University for Pilot Bhopal Supply Distribution Network of Bhopal Water Mass Rapid BRTS Supply Water Management KeralaKerala Kerala K Kerala Kerala Kerala MadhyaPradesh Madhya Pradesh Madhya Pradesh Madhya Pradesh System Transit Rapid Bus 126. 127. 128. 129. 130. 131. 132. 133. 134. 135. 64 2,734.00 1,647.12 30,717.00 4,324.66 5,600.00 5,717.00 7,801.00 7,081.00 32,649.00 Roads/Flyovers/ ROBs. Transport Sewerage Management Basis Sewerage Sewerage Drainage/Storm Drains Water Sewage Treatment Sewage Treatment Management of Indore City Solid Waste Sewerage Project Parking and Food Zone at VIP Road along the Parking and Food Zone at VIP from Koh-e-Fiza crossing to Talab Bada Khaungaon Construction of Multi-level Parking at 20 differentLocations in Indore City Parking lots and AB Road Pilot BRTITS Development for Corridor in IndoreProject Phase-I Mass Rapid Project Phase-II Spaces on PPP Transport System BhopalBhopal Stay-Bridge Cable at Kamla Park Sit-out, Cycle Track, Indore Development of Walkway, Indore Other Urban Indore Indore Solid Waste Indore JabalpurJabalpur Sewerage and Jabalpur Sewerage and Drains at Jabalpur City Water Storm Madhya Pradesh Pradesh Madhya Pradesh Madhya Pradesh Madhya Pradesh Madhya Pradesh Madhya Pradesh Madhya Pradesh Madhya Pradesh 1 2136. 3137 Madhya 138. 4139. 140. 141. 142. 5143. 6 144. 65 6,686.44 4,739.00 3,588.88 36,201.00 29,963.70 14,956.79 17,879.00 14,009.00 4,179.00 31,539.00 16,778.86 Management Sewerage Roads/Flyovers/ Sewerage Management Sewerage Sewerage Sewerage based Sewerage part of Project Phase-II Phase-III Scheme, Reorganisation of Water Supply Scheme of Water Reorganisation Restoration, Construction and GopalDevelopment of Mahakal and Kshetra Virasat Supply Water in Ujjain Management Waste Solid Municipal Corporation Mumbai Sewage Disposal Works Priority Stage-II Heritage Areas Wales Eastern Freeway from Prince of of Development APLR-MUIPMuseum to Solid Waste Underground Sewerage Phase-I for Thane ManagementSolid Waste Project, Greater Mumbai Sewerage System Project, for Thane Sewerage System Project, for Thane ROBs Underground Sewerage Project on Decentralised System Underground Sewerage for Solid Waste KDMC Ujjain Ujjain Ujjain Greater Mumbai Greater Mumbai Greater Mumbai Greater Mumbai Greater Mumbai Greater Mumbai Greater Mumbai Greater Mumbai Madhya Pradesh Madhya Pradesh Madhya Pradesh Maharashtra Maharashtra Maharashtra Maharashtra Maharashtra Maharashtra Maharashtra Maharashtra 145. 146. 147. 148. 149. 150. 151. 152. 153. 154. 155. 66 15,146.18 24,708.22 10,941.57 8,628.00 14,463.70 13,011.00 6,196.00 8,059.27 253.00 38,786.00 21,806.01 Sewerage Sewerage Roads/Flyovers/ ROBs Roads/Flyovers/ Sewerage ater Sewerage aste W Ambernath ater Supply Pench-IV (Part 2)ater Supply Pench-IV (Part 3)ater Supply Pench-IV Areaater Supply System for NIT Water Supply Water Supply Supply Water Kulgaon-Badlapur Undergound Kulgaon-Badlapur Undergound Scheme Supply SchemeWater Augmentation of existing Corporation of Kalyan Dombivali Municipal Sewerage System for Supply Water Municipal Council Road Over Bridges (ROBs) and from Pench Reservoir Water Lifting conveying upto Mahadulla by mortar lined MS pipeline in lieu of canal W Recycle and Reuse of Water Supply Construction of Road Over Bridge at Maskasath SupplyRehabilitation Plan to implement 24x7 Water Project for Nagpur City under PPP Framework Water Supply Distribution (Phase-II) Tertiary Network in 46 clusters ROBs Greater Mumbai Greater Mumbai Greater Mumbai Nagpur Nagpur Nagpur NagpurNagpurNagpur W Nagpur W Nagpur W Maharashtra Maharashtra Maharashtra Maharashtra Maharashtra Maharashtra Maharashtra Maharashtra Maharashtra Maharashtra Maharashtra 1 2156. 3157. 158. 159. 4160. 161. 162. 163. 164. 5165. 6 166. 67 21,497.33 3,126.94 2,198.37 1,847.50 7,642.96 17,182.92 22,037.87 9,996.00 47,662.20 35,862.00 43,422.00 Roads/Flyovers/ Sewerage Sewerage Drainage/Storm Transport System Transport System prevent Drains to Package-II in CIDCO, Sewerage Additional Municipal ater Supply Scheme (Phase-II) Water Supply ater Supply Distribution System, HUDCO Area, HUDCO ater Supply Distribution System, Water Supply Additional Municipalater Supply Scheme in Supply Water ater Supply Proposals (4 Nos.) for Supply Water Improvement for Movement Network in Improvement for Movement Network RoadsNanded Package-II, III and IIIB Sewerage Collection System Area, South Nanded HUDCO South Nanded ROBs Area in Nanded Corporation Sewerage Scheme for Corporation in Nanded Underground Sewerage Project Construction and Improvement of Bodies andWater Contamination of Natural Development of Heritage Sites along in Pune (Environmental Restoration/Preservation of Mula Mutha River Ecos Drains Water Bus Rapid Transit (Phase-I) for PuneCity- 48.77 Km. Pimpri-Chinchwad Bus Rapid Transport System (Development of Games, Youth Infrastructure for Commonwealth Mass Rapid 2008)-36.00 Km. Mass Rapid Nashik Nashik Nashik W MaharashtraMaharashtra Nanded Maharashtra Nanded Maharashtra NandedMaharashtra Nanded W Maharashtra Nanded Maharashtra W Maharashtra Pune MaharashtraMaharashtra Pune Maharashtra Pune Pune W 167. 168. 169. 170. 171. 172. 173. 174. 175. 176. 177. 68 21,920.00 31,214.00 11,630.24 20,682.00 38,016.88 11,807.01 14,317.27 4,149.72 4,058.24 2,446.00 19,349.72 System ater Drains Mass Rapid Transport System Mass Rapid Drainage/Storm Transport System Sewerage Drainage/Storm Drains Water Kms.) Transport (8.5 Kms.) Total (23 Total Newly Developed Shillong Phase-I for Pimri-Chinchwad Corridor-Nashik Phata to Wakad (TrunkWakad Phata to Corridor-Nashik Mass Rapid Corridor for Mumbai-Pune Highway Corridor for Mumbai-Pune Highway Corridor—Kalewadi-KSB Chowk to Dehu- Corridor—Kalewadi-KSB Chowk ater treatment plant & raw water pumping station Supply Water torm Water Drain torm Water Alandi Road (Trunk Route-7)-PCMC-11.20 Km. Alandi Road (Trunk Route-7)-PCMC-11.20 and Audh-Rawet Road (14.5 Kms.) and (Phase-II)Route No. 9)-PCMC-7.08 Km. Augmentation of water supply system for areaalong Pune Nagar Road under PMC Supply Water (Budruk), Pune under PMC Wadgoan at System Supply Water Continuous (24/7), Pressurized Supply Water for Pimpri-Chinchwad City Providing Sewerage System for Area of PCMC Supply Scheme for DevelopedWater Providing area of PCMC W Drainage Master Plan for Supply Water Supply Project (Phase-III)Greater Shillong Water Supply to Shillong Water for augmentation of Water Supply Shillong Shillong MaharashtraMaharashtra Pune Pune BRTS S Maharashtra Pune BRTS MaharashtraMaharashtra Pune Maharashtra PuneMaharashtra Pune Maharashtra Pune W Meghalaya Pune Meghalaya Maharashtra Pune BRTS 179. 180. 1 2178. 3 4182. 183. 184. 185. 5186. 187. 6 188. 181. 69 2,564.82 10,250.13 8,975.19 1,680.94 3,873.40 1,907.64 5,309.32 5,042.43 152.34 49,891.35 6,833.00 2,580.71 ater Bodies Drainage/Storm Drain Water Roads/Flyovers/ Roads/Flyovers/ Roads/Flyovers/ Drainage/Storm Sewerage Drainage/Storm Drains Water Management from along road rovement of Nambul River Front and Nagarovement of Nambul River Front Preservation of lid Waste Management for Imphal Management Waste lid Soild Waste torm Water Drainage Work for Imphal City Work Drainage Water torm Nala Supply for Manipur cityWater Integrated equipmentsRenewal pumping machines and Aizwal and transmission system of Greater of City Road Improvement and Widening Supply Water Phase-I Supply Water Vaivakawn of Improvement and Widening to Mizoram UniversityAizwal Shimui to Mizoram University as spur of City Ring RoadIntegrated Road and Multi Level Parking ProjectKohimaat W Construction of retaining wall Parking lots and NH-61 to north field schoolIntegrated Sewerage project ROB Storm water drainage for Bhubaneswar ROB ROB Drains Water spaces on PPP basis Imphal Kohima Kohima Bhubaneshwar Bhubaneshwar Imphal S ImphalImphal So Imp Manipur MizoramMizoram Aizwal Mizoram Aizwal Mizoram Aizwal Nagaland Aizwal Nagaland Orissa Orissa Manipur Manipur Manipur 192. 193. 194. 195. 196. 197. 198. 199. 200. 191. 189. 190. 70 16,690.00 20,340.00 4,578.00 49,554.00 8,927.00 24,139.00 9,785.00 16,642.00 3,841.80 11,208.00 7,495.97 11,086.00 431.00 ater supply Sewerage Mass Rapid Transport System Sewerage Sewerage Management Sewerage sewerage treatment II Sewerage (Phase-I) r-Pushkar W Project Phase system for Jaipur TS-Amritsar (31 Km.) ater Supply to Ajme ater Supply to 24x7 Piped Water Supply to Puri Town to Puri Supply 24x7 Piped Water to the urban Comprehensive Sewerage Scheme areas of Puducherry supply system forRehabilitation of existing water Amritsar walled city area, Water Supply Supply Water Providing Sewerage network and plant for South East Zone plant at Ludhiana AjmerArea, Urban Renewal of Dargah Sewerage ProjectConservation and propagation of Panna Meena Renewal Urban JaipurAmber, Bori and its environs of Preservation Water Bodies Sewerage Puri Amritsar AmritsarAmritsar BR LudhianaLudhiana Providing sewerage and sewage treatment Ajmer-Pushkar Management facilitiesWaste Integrated Solid Ajmer-Pushkar W Ajmer-Pushkar Jaipur Solid Waste JaipurJaipur Sewerage Jaipur Sewerage Orissa PuducherryPunjab Puducherry Punjab Punjab Punjab Punjab Rajasthan Rajasthan Rajasthan Rajasthan Rajasthan Rajasthan 1 2201. 202. 3203. 204. 205. 4206. 207. 208. 209. 210. 5211. 212. 6 213. 71 26,035.94 2,761.00 7,261.66 31,266.00 4,440.80 2,808.05 2,424.00 1,917.00 15,805.41 13,091.00 4,421.25 5,745.50 ater Supply Mass Rapid Urban Renewal Roads/Flyovers/ Sewerage Management Sewerage to Sewerage Maduravoyal Ambattur Sewerage of Jaipur-Phase-I to Ullagaram e Sewerage scheme facilities for ater Supply System in Chennai Supply Water facilities for Chennai illage Panchayat-Improvement W comprehensive water supply scheme to Supply Water TS (Package-IIIA & IIIB), Jaipur 39.45 Km . & IIIB), Jaipur TS (Package-IIIA (for all 3 projects) City Walled Revitalisation of of raw water trunkUpgradation and modernization for Greater Gangtok mains and water treatment plant Water Supply Transport System (6 Nos.) ROB Puzhithivakkam Ullagaram Puzhuthivakkam Municipality. of Water Supply of Water Avadi Municipality Avadi Municipality (Phase-III) and Tambaram Municipality and Tambaram Municipality JaipurJaipur Gangtok BR ChennaiW Improvements to Chennai at Chennai Construction of ROBs and RUBs Chennai Providing sewerage facilities Chennai Providing Chennai Nerkundram V Chennai Providing comprehensiv Chennai Providing sewerage Chennai PallavaramAlandur, Management of Solid Waste Solid Waste Chennai Providing Sewage Nadu Nadu Nadu Nadu Nadu Nadu Nadu Nadu Nadu Rajasthan Rajasthan Sikkim 214. 215. 216. 217. Tamil 218. Tamil 219. Tamil 220. Tamil 221. Tamil 222. Tamil 223. Tamil 224. Tamil 225. Tamil 72 8,511,70 33,505.00 32,867.00 3,829.00 44,581.00 16,096.59 2,019.24 22,735.57 5,861.00 11,610.00 Drainage/Storm Sewerage Sewarage Drainage/Storm Sewerage for Sewerage 120 Sewerage scheme to Scheme to in Drainage/Storm in Drainage/Storm Drainage system Drainage system Supply Scheme Supply Water Sewerage Water Drains Water Water Drains Water Commissioning of additional Micro and Macro Micro and Macro Panchayat-Providing Sewerage Facilities to Thiruvottiyur Municipality the Northern Basin of Chennai Drains Water in Central basin of Chennai Drains Water Porur town panchayat the Eastern Basin of Chennai City Drains Water scheme to Tambaram Municipality Tambaram scheme to Perungudi town Panchayat in the Southern Basin of Chennai City Drains Water Pallikarani town Panchayat MLD sewage treatment plant at Koyambedu (Phase-II) in, Chennai Chennai Water Providing Comprehensive Chennai Improvement to Storm Chennai to Improvement Chennai Porur Chennai Improvement to Storm Chennai Providing comprehensive Chennai Providing Comprehensive Sewerage Chennai to Improvement Chennai Providing Comprehensive Sewerage Chennaiand Construction Nadu Nadu Nadu Nadu Nadu Nadu Nadu Nadu Nadu Nadu 1 2226. Tamil 3 4 5 6 227. Tamil 228. Tamil 229. Tamil 230. Tamil 231. Tamil 232. Tamil 233. Tamil 234. Tamil 235. Tamil 73 3,678.13 1,019.96 6,959.90 1,535.65 2,284.36 2,299.29 2,903.73 1,946.94 1,996.25 2,489.93 Supply Schemes Supply Water Supply Scheme Supply Water Supply Scheme Supply Water Supply Scheme Supply Water Supply Scheme Supply Water Supply Scheme Supply Water Supply Scheme Supply Water Supply Scheme Supply Water Supply Scheme Supply Water Supply Scheme Supply Water for Pallikarani in Chennai City for Chinnasekkadu in Chennai City for Chinnasekkadu in Chennai for Puzhal Surapattu, Puthagaram and for Puzhal Surapattu, Puthagaram Kathirvedu in Chennai City for Vadaperumabakkam and Theeyambakkam in for Vadaperumabakkam Chennai City for Edayanchavadi, Sadayankuppam and Kadapakkam in Chennai City in Palavakkam in Mugalivakkam in Manali, Chennai in Kottivakkam in Perungudi Chennai Water Providing Comprehensive Chennai Water Providing Comprehensive Chennai Water Providing Comprehensive Chennai Water Providing Comprehensive Chennai Water Providing Comprehensive Chennai Water Providing Comprehensive Chennai Water Providing Comprehensive Chennai Water Providing Comprehensive Chennai Water Providing Comprehensive Chennai Water Providing Comprehensive Nadu Nadu Nadu Nadu Nadu Nadu Nadu Nadu Nadu Nadu 236. Tamil 237. Tamil 238. Tamil 239. Tamil 240. Tamil 241. Tamil 242. Tamil 243. Tamil 244. Tamil 245. Tamil 74 2,177.01 1,356.56 759.56 3,299.88 4,630.68 2,456.60 37,712.88 5,882.36 45,166.24 25,181.00 Sewerage Sewerage Sewerage Sewerage Drainage/Storm for Sewerage Sewerage Sewerage Sewerage sewerage scheme Supply Scheme Water Supply ater Supply Scheme for Water Supply ter Supply improvement scheme to 16 Townter Supply improvement scheme to 16 Supply Water for Poonamalle Town in Thiruvallur for Poonamalle Town Anagaputhur Town in Kancheepuram Town Anagaputhur Annai Sivagami Nagar in Thiruvottiyur in Annai Sivagami Nagar in Thiruvottiyur Chennai City Scheme in Surapattu Scheme in Muglivakam Scheme in Nolambur Comprehensive Underground Sewerage Scheme Panchayats in Coimbatore Urban Agglomeration Panchayats in Coimbatore Urban Improvement and revamping of WaterImprovement and revamping of supply scheme to CMC Supply Water natural Drains (improvement and Drain) Water construction of Storm Drains Water Chennai Water Improvement of ChennaiW Improvement of Chennai Providing Underground Chennai Providing Underground Chennai Providing Underground Chennai Providing Underground Madurai Drain and Desilting of Water Storm Nadu Nadu Nadu Nadu Nadu Nadu Nadu Coimbatore Nadu Coimbatore Wa Nadu Coimbatore Nadu 1 2246. Tamil 3 4 5 6 247. Tamil 248. Tamil 249. Tamil 250. Tamil 251. Tamil 252. Tamil 253. Tamil 254. Tamil 255. Tamil 75 22,934.00 20,141.00 7,826.00 1,0221.00 3,083.99 8,270.50 19,592.00 8,969.00 3,041.49 15,915.22 33,826.00 27,094.89 19,088.22 14,196.00 Sewerage Sewerage Management Sewerage Management Sewerage Sewerage Phase-III Scheme for habad Sewerage Phase-I (Part-1) aste Management in Agraaste Management in Solid Waste system of Alla system of Supply Supply Water tala Water Supply Project (North Zone)Water tala Supply Water area and Renovation of existing Sewerage System area and Renovation of existing Scheme to Madurai Urban Agglomeration Area Agglomeration Scheme to Madurai Urban Scheme for Sewerage and Sewerage Treatment Area) North Zone (Priority I W Municipal Solid Agra Sewerage Scheme (Part-II) (Zone D) Phase-I I and II area of Kanpur City Vol Area of Kanpur Sewerage work of Inner Old City Sewerage Treatment for Kanpur City Madurai Sewerage Under Ground AgartalaAgartala Agra Agar AgraAgra Water Madurai SupplyWater Providing combined Supply Water Nadu Nadu Tripura Tripura Uttar Pradesh Uttar Pradesh Uttar Pradesh Uttar PradeshUttar Pradesh AllahabadUttar Pradesh AllahabadAllahabad City Supply Component of Water Uttar Pradesh AllahabadAllahabad Management for Waste Solid Uttar AllahabadPradesh Allahabad City Supply component of Supply Water Water Uttar Pradesh Kanpur Sewerage Uttar Pradesh Solid Waste Kanpur Supply Water Kanpur Supply scheme for inner old Water Supply Water 256. Tamil 257. Tamil 258. 259. 260. 261. 262. 263. 264. 265. 266. 267. 268. 269. 76 37,778,92 20,736.00 4,292.37 38,861.00 34,451.00 32,521.00 21,443.00 14,656.60 8,720.00 6,035.77 2,259.40 27,301.00 Sewerage Management Drainage/Storm Drains Water Drainage/Storm Drains Water Sewerage Management Sewerage for Lucknow orks in Lucknow City-Lucknow City- Sewerage Sewerage Drainage ater Supply Works of LucknowWorks ater Supply Supply Water ater Supply for Lucknow (Phase-I, Part-II) Water Supply ater Supply for Meerut Supply Water torm Water Drainage torm Water torm Water Kanpur-Sewerage works in District IV Kanpur-Sewerage works in District in Kanpur City Management inWaste Municipal Solid Lucknow V) I to Vol. (Phase I Part Sewerage works for Solid Waste Sewerage District-III (Part-10) Sewerage works for Sewerage District-III (Part-II) W DPR for Sewerage Zone-II of Mathura City ManagementMunicipal Solid Waste Solid Waste Lucknow LucknowLucknow W LucknowLucknow S LucknowMathuraMathura W S Meerut Meerut W Uttar PradeshUttar Pradesh KanpurUttar Pradesh Kanpur Uttar Pradesh Supply Part-II for remaining area of Kanpur Water Uttar Pradesh Water Supply Uttar Pradesh Uttar Pradesh Uttar Pradesh Uttar Pradesh Uttar Pradesh Uttar Pradesh Uttar Pradesh 1 2270. 3271. 272. 273. 274. 4275. 276. 277. 278. 5279. 6 280. 281. 77 19,092.00 11,102.00 4,867.73 8,610.00 25,373.00 30,912.00 20,916.00 7,002.70 2,460.00 2,757.91 5,465.00 6,283.00 1,765.05 Sewerage Management Drainage/Storm Drains Water Management Roads/Flyovers/ ROB Sewerage Roads/Flyovers/ ROB area Sewerage rans Varuna rans Varuna Scheme Sewerage aste Management Solid Waste Sewerage Zone- ganisation scheme (Phase I) Supply Water aste Management of Varanasiaste Management of Solid Waste Supply Component (priority-II) for Trans- Water Supply r Supply Part-II of Cis-Varuna arear Supply Part-II of Cis-Varuna Water Supply ater Supply Component Priority of Varanasi of ater Supply Component Priority Supply Water ater Supply reor torm Water Drainage works for Varanasi Drainage works for Water torm Sewerage Work in Sewerage Work 5&7 of Meerut City T Varanasi Sewerage work for City Area of Varanasi Varuna W Integrated Solid Improvement of 30 intersections of Dehradun city Dehradun Sewerage Dehradun Sewerage Scheme (Phase -I) for L Zone Improvement of junctions for Haridwar City Meerut DehradunDehradun W Dehradun Dehradun Dehradun Haridwar Uttar Pradesh Uttar PradeshUttar Pradesh VaranasiUttar Pradesh VaranasiUttar Pradesh Varanasi W W Solid Uttar Pradesh VaranasiUttar Pradesh Wate Varanasi Uttarakhand Varanasi S Uttarakhand Uttarakhand Water Uttarakhand Uttarakhand Uttarakhand 282. 283. 284. 285. 286. 287. 288. 289. 290. 291. 292. 293. 294. 78 1,671.53 2,109.28 1,960.00 800.00 1,182.27 3,627.00 4,357.27 8,982.96 3,999.32 12681.40 7,781.79 ater supply Management Sewerage Management Heritage Areas Management Sewerage Roads/Flyovers/ ROB via Raniganj under W of Sewerage D (Kankhal) Ranigunj Municipality MLD Water Supply Project in MLD Water MGD Water Supply Scheme forWater MGD Water Supply ntegrated Solid Waste Management in Haridwar Management Waste ntegrated Solid Solid Waste Sewerage System in Zone New Haridwar) and Zone D1 (Arya Nagar, Reorganisation and expansion Nainital sewerage Management in NainitalWaste Integrated Solid Restoration and conservation of Raj Bhawan Solid Waste Bengal West Area, Asansol Urban of Development in Management Water Municipal Solid Area Asansol Urban Asansol Municipal Corporation Sewerage Project for Solid Waste 24x7 water supply scheme (Phase III) for DurgapurImprovement upgradation & strengthening of road Water Supply for Gammon bridge to Gandhi more (NH-2) Maya Bazar in Durgapur HaridwarHaridwar I Nainital Nainital Nainital AsansolAsansol 42 AsansolAsansol Asansol 10 Asansol est Bengal est Bengal est Bengal est Bengal est Bengal est Bengal Uttarakhand Uttarakhand Uttarakhand Uttarakhand Uttarakhand 1 2295. 3296. 297. 298. 4299. 300. W 301. W 302. W 5303. W 304. W 6 305. W 79 8,951.65 951.86 9,068.91 5,309.67 3,756.25 12,950.88 2,521.87 15,360.00 4,316.61 9,693.45 4,492.00 9,712.00 40,291.00 Drainage/Storm Drains Water Roads/Flyovers/ Roads/Flyovers/ ROB Roads/Flyovers Roads/Flyovers/ Sewerage in Kolkata (Phase-I) Sewerage Brick Sewer in Howrah ater Treatment Plan at BansberiaTreatment ater Water Supply Bypass Connector from ater supply scheme for Baruipur Municipalityater Supply Scheme for added areas Supply Water Supply Water ater Treatment Plan at Dhapa 30 MGD Phase-ITreatment ater Water Supply ivekanand Road Flyover from Howrah of Howrah Municipal Corporation Padmapukur to Kamalgazi, KolkataDunlop interchange Barrackpore and North BarrackporeMunicipal Areas 24x7 water supply scheme for ROB Chandernagore Municipal Corporation crossing/ROB Avenue to CR Water Supply Water Supply Improvement, widening to 4 lane and strengthening Improvement, widening to 4 lane Asansol.SCOB gate at of road from Jublee Dhaba to ROB W 15 MGD Upgradation of Man Entry System (Part) for Kolkata Improvement of drainage KolkataKolkataKolkata W W Kolkata EM Kolkata Kolkata Kolkata V Asansol KolkataKolkata KolkataKolkata W Kolkata Upgradation of Sewer System est Bengal est Bengal est Bengal est Bengal est Bengal est Bengal est Bengal est Bengal est Bengal est Bengal est Bengal est Bengal est Bengal 312. W 313. W 314. W 315. W 316. W 317. W 318. W 306. W 307. W 308. W 309. W 310. W 311. W 80 4,809.00 31,272.08 29,166.14 6,189.45 8,164.12 21,555.27 24,970.42 2,062.00 2,358.45 3,480.16 Renewal Roads/Flyovers/ Roads/Flyovers/ Drainage/Storm Drainage/Storm , Sewerage in Bidhannagar in BB Square Urban Scheme in ater Drainage Scheme ater Supply Scheme for Budge Water Supply Supply Scheme for Bhatpara Municipal Supply Water onstruction of Flyover from Park ransmunicipal Surface Water Supply Scheme forWater ransmunicipal Surface Water Supply Construction of flyover at Nager Bazar Construction of flyover at Nager junction on Jessore Road Municipalities Dum Dum and South Dum Dum Circus to Parama IslandStorm water drainage for Chandannagar Municipal CorporationArea, Kolkata UA ROB Budge Municipality Kolkata UA Comprehensive Distribution Network within theDrains command zone of 30 MGD Dhapa Water Plant Treatment Water Water Supply ROB Rejuvenation of Dalhousie Drainage and Sewerage project Kolkata Municipal Area Water Drains Kolkata KolkataKolkata T Kolkata C KolkataKolkata 24x7W KolkataKolkata Kolkata Water Kolkata Storm W est Bengal est Bengal est Bengal est Bengal est Bengal est Bengal est Bengal est Bengal est Bengal est Bengal 1 2319. W 3320. W 321. W 322. W 4323. W 324. W 325. W 326. 5 W 327. W 6 328. W 81 291.00 5,131.12 3,587.39 12,478.23 24,602.30 3,257.00 31,457.00 20,658.85 1,369.41 13,849.36 6,733.87 System Drainage/Storm Roads/Flyovers/ Roads/Flyovers/ Roads/Flyovers/ Drainage/Storm Drains Water Mass Rapid 25, Canal Drainage/Storm for Km. Transport Bagjola ater Supply Scheme for Supply Water ater Drainage Scheme from Ultadanga to Goria in Kolkata rovement of Upper ater Supply Project (Phase-II) for Water Supply torm Water Drainage for Baranagar Water torm torm W within Kolkata UA.Area with Kolkata UA.Municipal Uluberia Municipality in Kolkata Drains Water Drains Water 24X7 Water Supply Scheme forWater 24X7 Kolkata Panihati Municipality, Construction of Flyover Eastern Railway Main Road ChandannagarApproach Line along with Expressway Road Project within KMA ROB Elevated Corridor from Kestoput to Water Supply AvenurJora Mandir on Kazi Narul Islam ROB ROB Metering of Water Supply System forMetering of Water Chandannagar Municipal Corporation Kolkata Bally Municipality, Kolkata Kamarhati Municipality, Supply Water Metropolitan Area: 15.50 KolkataKolkata S W Kolkata Kolkata KolkataKolkata Dum Barrackpore Kalyani-Dum Kolkata Imp Kolkata KolkataKolkata Surface W Kolkata S BRTS est Bengal est Bengal est Bengal est Bengal est Bengal est Bengal est Bengal est Bengal est Bengal est Bengal 338. W 339. W 333. W 334. W 335. W 336. W 337 Bengal West 329. W 330. W 331. W 332. W 82 1,293.00 650.69 10,016.62 44,547.77 19,484.00 25,573.00 4,433.49 7,204.37 8,548.33 Roads/Flyovers /RoB Transport Roads/Flyovers /RoB Roads/Flyovers/ Roads/Flyovers/ Drainage/Storm Drainage/Storm for Drainage System system for ransmunicipal Water Supply project forWater ransmunicipal Supply project forWater ransmunicipal Supply Water Supply Water RoB on A.P. Banerjee Road Connecting Ghosh A.P. RoB on No. 5-8 Ward Para Road Kalyani Highway in of Bhatpara Municipality Near Kalyani Railway StationTerminus Bus Intersection of Four Lane Fly Over at Kamalgazi starting point EM Bypass Connector at the Other Urban in Kolkata Adi Ganga of municipal towns of Madhyamgram, New Barrackpore and Barasat municipal towns of Titagarh and Khardah Construction of elevated road between Jinzia Bazzar and Batanagar on BudgeBudge Trunk Road Barrackpore-Kalyani Dum Dum Expressway Road project from Sodepur to MB Road (Phase II)Storm water drainage KolkataMadhyamgram Municipality, RoB Water Integrated Storm RoB KolkataBarasat Municipality, Drains Water Drains Water Kolkata Kolkata Kolkata KolkataKolkata T Kolkata T Kolkata Kolkata Kolkata est Bengal est Bengal est Bengal est Bengal est Bengal est Bengal est Bengal 1 2340 Bengal West 3341. W 342. W 4343 Bengal West 344. W 345. W 346. 5 W 347. W 6 348. W 83 6,401.74 5,107.31 8877.28 6,616.98 ater Drains ater Drains Drainage/Storm Drainage/Storm Drainage/Storm for South for Rishra project for ater Supply Scheme for Bhadreswar Supply Water Storm water drainage Baruipur MunicipalityStorm water drainage project Municipality Kolkata Municipality, Storm water drainage project Drains Water W Dum Dum Municipality W Kolkata Kolkata Kolkata Kolkata W est Bengal est Bengal est Bengal est Bengal 349. W 350. W 352. W 351. W List of ongoing Projects under UIDSSMT of JuNNURM (Including Mission & Transition Phase)

Sl. Name of State Name of towns/ Name of Project Approved No. cities Cost sanctioned by SLSC 12 3 4 5 1. Andhra Pradesh Anakapalli Storm Water Drainage 2,222.00

2. Andhra Pradesh Chirala Solid Waste Management 361.00 3. Andhra Pradesh Dhone Water Supply 4,476.00 4. Andhra Pradesh Kadapa Sewerage 4,915.00

5. Andhra Pradesh Karimnagar Sewerage 6,237.00 6. Andhra Pradesh Miryalaguda Sewerage 3,493.00 7. Andhra Pradesh Nalgonda Sewerage 4,688.00

8. Andhra Pradesh Narsaraopet Sewerage 2,641.00 9. Andhra Pradesh Nizamabad Sewerage 8,106.00 10. Andhra Pradesh Nuzvid Water Supply 4,119.00 11. Andhra Pradesh Pithapuram Water Supply 1,966.00

12. Andhra Pradesh Ramachandra Water Supply 1,162.00 Puram 13. Andhra Pradesh Suryapet Storm Water Drainage 2,464.00

14. Andhra Pradesh Yeminganur Sewerage 3,983.00 15. Arunachal Pradesh Yingkiong Soil Erosion 963.00 16. Arunachal Pradesh Koloriang Road 1,349.00

17. Arunachal Pradesh Roing Road 1,616.00 18. Arunachal Pradesh Dirang Road 2,143.00 19. Arunachal Pradesh Aalo Soil Erosion 880.22

20. Arunachal Pradesh Seppa Soil Erosion 615.52 21. Arunachal Pradesh Basar Solid Waste Management 719.85 22. Arunachal Pradesh Bomdila Solid Waste Management 799.84

84 85

12 3 4 5 23. Arunachal Pradesh Doimukh Road 906.97 24. Assam Hojai Water Supply 1,055.54 25. Assam Barpeta Storm Water Drainage 1,871.96 26. Assam Barpeta Road Storm Water Drainage 328.57 27. Assam Dergaon Storm Water Drainage 1,660.36 28. Assam Dhekiajuli Storm Water Drainage 722.88 29. Assam Dhubri Storm Water Drainage 710.17 30. Assam Digboi Storm Water Drainage 1,074.97 31. Assam Gauripur Storm Water Drainage 547.64 32. Assam Gosaigoan Storm Water Drainage 201.98 33. Assam Hailakandi Storm Water Drainage 783.64 34. Assam Jorhat Storm Water Drainage 1,592.42 35. Assam Lakhipur Storm Water Drainage 264.18 36. Assam Lakhipur Water Supply 815.88 (Cachar) 37. Assam Lakhipur Storm Water Drainage 632.10 (Cachar) 38. Assam Lala Storm Water Drainage 612.21 39. Assam Sapatgram Storm Water Drainage 565.06 40. Assam Sarthebari Storm Water Drainage 274.14 41. Assam Simaluguri Storm Water Drainage 667.74 42. Assam Titabar Storm Water Drainage 828.85 43. Bihar Fatuha Road 759.82 44. Bihar Arrah Solid Waste Management 983.99 45. Bihar Barbigha Road 1,573.00 46. Bihar Bhabua Road 1,088.00 47. Bihar Chakia Road 1,285.00 48. Bihar Muzaffarpur Water Supply 9,872.25 49. Bihar Narkatiaganj Road 4,712.54 50. Bihar Rosera Road 2,921.32 86

12 3 4 5 51. Chhattisgarh Bilaspur Water Suply 4,142.60 52. Chhattisgarh Bilaspur Sewerage 19,025.00 53. Chhattisgarh Raigarh Water Supply 1,524.50 54. Chhattisgarh Bhilai-Caroda Water Supply 9,962.11 55. Chhattisgarh Korba Water Supply 13,334.12 56. Goa Sankhali Road 1,447.00 57. Goa Sanguem* Road 585.00 58. Gujarat Bilimora Water Supply 806.25 59. Gujarat Boriyavi Water Supply 434.35 60. Gujarat Dakor Water Supply 451.98 61. Gujarat Dharagadhra Water Supply 1,461.04 62. Gujarat Junagadh Water Supply 1,598.64 63. Gujarat Kathlal Water Supply 392.44 64. Gujarat Lunawada Water Supply 477.04 65. Gujarat Mahudha Water Supply 528.52 66. Gujarat Pethapur Water Supply 428.20 67. Gujarat Sutarpada Water Supply 657.74 68. Gujarat Wadhwan Water Supply 1,539.28 69. Haryana Rohtak Solid Waste 1,988.16 Management 70. Haryana Ambala Sewerage 2,082.19 71. Haryana Narnaul Sewerage 812.99 72. Haryana Ambala Sewerage 3,728.00 73. Himachal Pradesh Sarkaghat Road 184.63 74. Himachal Pradesh Sarkaghat Water Supply 3,964.36 75. Himachal Pradesh Hamirpur Water Supply 6,485.19 76. Himachal Pradesh Dharamshala Water Supply 2,973.89 77. Himachal Pradesh Rewalsar Road 475.00 78. Himachal Pradesh Dharamshala Road 2,094.54 79. Himachal Pradesh Rampur Water Supply 1,914.14 87

12 3 4 5 180. Himachal Pradesh Nagrota Water Supply 1,101.00 181. Himachal Pradesh Kangra Water Supply 1,742.99 182. Himachal Pradesh Mandi Water Supply 8,218.30 183. Himachal Pradesh Manali Water Supply 1,504.25 184. Himachal Pradesh Kullu Water Supply 2,273.91 185. Himachal Pradesh Nalagarh Sewerage 1,636.50 186. Himachal Pradesh Parwano Water Supply 727.19 187. Himachal Pradesh Baddi Sewerage 3,334.34 188. Jharkhand Chas Solid Waste 567.62 Management 189. Jharkhand Hazaribagh Solid Waste 569.17 Management 190. Jharkhand Lohardaga Solid Waste 447.80 Management 191. Jharkhand Chaibasa Water Supply 3,217.80 192. Jammu & Kashmir Akhnoor Solid Waste 1,65.44 Management 193. Jammu & Kashmir Anantnag Water Supply 3,689.23 194. Jammu & Kashmir Anantnag Solid Waste 488.00 Management 195. Jammu & Kashmir Baramula Solid Waste 242.00 Management 196. Jammu & Kashmir Baramula Road 378.00 197. Jammu & Kashmir Bhadrwah Water Supply 1,177.98 198. Jammu & Kashmir Bhadrwah Storm Water Drainage 822.55 199. Jammu & Kashmir Doda Road 430.24 100. Jammu & Kashmir Doda Water Supply 2,633.60 101. Jammu & Kashmir Doda Storm Water Drainage 557.15 102. Jammu & Kashmir Ganderbal Road 2,418.00 103. Jammu & Kashmir Ganderbal Solid Waste Management 1,43.00 104. Jammu & Kashmir Ganderbal Storm Water Drainage 1,827.24 88

12 3 4 5 105. Jammu & Kashmir Kathua Solid Waste Management 146.43 106. Jammu & Kashmir Kathua Road 1,195.59 107. Jammu & Kashmir Kathua Storm Water Drainage 4,089.00 108. Jammu & Kashmir Kupwara Solid Waste Management 385.00 109. Jammu & Kashmir Kupwara Road 627.00 110. Jammu & Kashmir Kupwara Storm Water Drainage 746.79 111. Jammu & Kashmir Leh Water Supply 7,048.83 112. Jammu & Kashmir Leh Road 7,653.16 113. Jammu & Kashmir Leh Solid Waste Management 1,094.27 114. Jammu & Kashmir Leh Sewerage 5,939.00 115. Jammu & Kashmir Poonch Solid Waste Management 134.52 116. Jammu & Kashmir Poonch Storm Water Drainage 1,271.35 117. Jammu & Kashmir Samba Solid Waste Management 165.12 118. Jammu & Kashmir Samba Road 354.00 119. Jammu & Kashmir Samba Water Supply 1,882.00 120. Jammu & Kashmir Samba Storm Water Drainage 1,013.66 121. Jammu & Kashmir Sopore Water Supply 3,353.16 122. Jammu & Kashmir Sopore Solid Waste Management 242.00 123. Jammu & Kashmir Sopore Road 323.00 124. Jammu & Kashmir Sundarbani Water Supply 930.71 125. Jammu & Kashmir Sundarbani Storm Water Drainage 1,004.60 126. Jammu & Kashmir Sundarbani Urban Renewal 212.03 127. Jammu & Kashmir Udhampur Water Supply 2,882.00 128. Karnataka Bawavana Sewerage 844.00 Bagewadi 129. Karnataka Birur Water Supply 1,339.00 130. Karnataka Channapatna Sewerage 1,311.00 131. Karnataka Davangere Storm Water Drainage 5,060.30 89

12 3 4 5 132. Karnataka Devangere Sewerage 336.00 133. Karnataka Devangere Road 3,128.40 134. Karnataka Gajendragarh- Water Supply 3,632.44 Naregal 135. Karnataka Harihara Storm Water Drainage 2,422.00 136. Karnataka Holenarasipura Road 2,024.00 137. Karnataka Holenarasipura Sewerage 303.00 138. Karnataka Konnur Road 750.79 139. Karnataka Malavalli Sewerage 730.41 140. Karnataka Malbagalu Water Supply 1,894.76 141. Karnataka Nanjangud Sewerage 974.58 142. Karnataka Pandavapura Sewerage 602.09 143. Karnataka Ramangara Storm Water Drainage 1,460.00 144. Karnataka Shikarpura Sewerage 1,317.00 145. Karnataka Soundatti Sewerage 867.84 146. Karnataka Srirangapatna Sewerage 522.18 147. Karnataka Vijayapura Water Supply 1,109.62 148. Karnataka Yargol (Kolar- Water Supply 7,992.00 Bangarpet Mallur) 149. Karnataka Hukkeri Water Supply 2,301.73 150. Karnataka Chikodi Water Supply 3,303.85 151. Karnataka Bannur Water Supply 1,736.12 152. Karnataka Bentwal Water Supply 4,204.35 153. Karnataka Ramdurga Water Supply 3,471.30 154. Karnataka Curumitkal Sewerage 1,842.75 155. Karnataka Sadalga Water Supply 2,457.77 156. Karnataka Sedam Water Supply 2,464.19 157. Karnataka Doddaballapura Water Supply 3,315.45 158. Karnataka Srirangapatna Water Supply 2,071.09 159. Karnataka Birur Sewerage 2,131.82 90

12 3 4 5

160. Karnataka Sankeshwar Water Supply 3,765.86 161. Karnataka Thirthahalli Water Supply 829.81 162. Karnataka Sadalga Sewerage 2,406.05 163. Karnataka Yellapura Water Supply 963.48 164. Karnataka Tumkur Water Supply 19,898.00 165. Karnataka Kundapura Water Supply 4,736.79 166. Karnataka Mundagod Water Supply 1,223.79 167. Karnataka Muddebihal Sewerage 3,781.86 168. Karnataka Kanakpura Road 6,171.00 169. Karnataka Ramduraga Road 3,765.37 170. Kerala Alappuzha Water Supply 9,194.00 171. Kerala Alappuzha Soild Waste 423.00 Management 172. Kerala Attingal Soild Waste 306.00 Management 173. Kerala Changanassery Soild Waste 390.00 Management 174. Kerala Changanassery Water Supply 391.00 175. Kerala Chavakkad Water Supply 1,900.67 (Combined Project) 176. Kerala Guruvayar Water Supply 3,144.33 (Combined Project) 177. Kerala Koyilandy Soild Waste 208.00 Management 178. Kerala Nedumangad Soild Waste 229.00 Management 179. Kerala Neyyattinkara Soild Waste 349.00 Management 180. Kerala North Paravour Soild Waste 183.00 Management 181. Kerala Ottapalam Water Supply 1,800.00 91

12 3 4 5

182. Kerala Pathanamthitta Soild Waste 380.00 Management 183. Kerala Payyannur Water Supply 4,019.00 184. Kerala Perinthalamanna Water Supply 811.00 185. Kerala Perinthalamanna Soild Waste 522.00 Management 186. Kerala Punalur Soild Waste 482.00 Management 187. Kerala Thalassery Water Supply 4,120.00

188. Kerala Thiruvalla Water Supply 627.90 189. Kerala Malappuram Soild Waste 1,466.66 Management 190. Maharashtra Achalpur Water Supply 3,759.00 191. Maharashtra Ahmednagar Water Supply 7,305.00 192. Maharashtra Akola Sewerage 13,275.00 193. Maharashtra Akot Water Supply 1,957.00 194. Maharashtra Alibag Sewerage 1,240.00 195. Maharashtra Ambad Sewerage 811.00 196. Maharashtra Amravati Sewerage 8,612.28 197. Maharashtra Arvi Water Supply 729.30 198. Maharashtra Aurangabad Water Supply 35,967.00 199. Maharashtra Baramati Water Supply 1,368.00 200. Maharashtra Basmath Water Supply 3,213.00 201. Maharashtra Beed Water Supply 2,076.00 202. Maharashtra Bhadravati Water Supply 1,725.20 203. Maharashtra Chandrapur Sewerage 7,201.30 204. Maharashtra Daund Sewerage 1,915.80 205. Maharashtra Gondia Water Supply 6,138.26 206. Maharashtra Hadgaon Water Supply 214.62 207. Maharashtra Hingoli Water Supply 4,576.92 92

12 3 4 5 208. Maharashtra Ichalkaranji Water Supply 3,694.82 209. Maharashtra Jaysingpur Water Supply 691.00 210. Maharashtra Kamptee Sewerage 2,221.21 211. Maharashtra Karad Water Supply 2,910.00 212. Maharashtra Katol Road 2,468.30 213. Maharashtra Khamgaon Water Supply 4,328.18 214. Maharashtra Khopoli Water Supply 1,483.00 215. Maharashtra Kolhapur Sewerage 3,198.00 216. Maharashtra Kolhapur Water Supply 5,844.00 217. Maharashtra Latur Storm Water Drainage 5,531.00 218. Maharashtra Malegaon Water Supply 4,611.00 219. Maharashtra Malvan Sewerage 1,884.00 220. Maharashtra Murtijapur Water Supply 1,767.00 221. Maharashtra Pandharpur Storm Water Drainage 3,175.00 222. Maharashtra Panvel Sewerage 3,107.15 223. Maharashtra Parbhani Water Supply 10,448.00 224. Maharashtra Parola Water Supply 403.00 225. Maharashtra Pen Water Supply 1,297.00 226. Maharashtra Pusad Water Supply 838.90 227. Maharashtra Sailu Water Supply 1,189.00 228. Maharashtra Sangamner Water Supply 878.00 229. Maharashtra Sangli, Miraj, Water Supply 7,902.00 Kupwad 230. Maharashtra Sangola Water Supply 2,145.00 231. Maharashtra Saoner Road 2,646.06 232. Maharashtra Satara Water Supply 4,715.90 233. Maharashtra Savner Sewerage 631.50 234. Maharashtra Shahada Water Supply 1,724.00 235. Maharashtra Shrirampur Water Supply 4,357.00 236. Maharashtra Sillod Water Supply 1,236.88 93

12 3 4 5 237. Maharashtra Solapur Water Supply 7,198.95 238. Maharashtra Tasgaon Water Supply 1,456.00 239. Maharashtra Umred Water Supply 1,516.00 240. Maharashtra Umred Road 1,527.92 241. Maharashtra Vadgaon Water Supply 664.00 242. Maharashtra Vaijapur Water Supply 3,490.60 243 Maharashtra Vengurla Sewerage 795.35 244. Maharashtra Washim Water Supply 2,997.00 245. Maharashtra Yavatmal Water Supply 1,096.00 246. Maharashtra Yeola Water Supply 1,012.65 247. Maharashtra Shirpur Warvade Water Supply 3,077.77 248. Maharashtra Shirampur Sewerage 4,936.29 249. Maharashtra Kopargaon Water Supply 3,989.92 250. Maharashtra Gangapur Water Supply 1,790.79 251. Maharashtra Malkapur (Karad) Sewerage 4,091.47 252. Maharashtra Baramati Sewerage 2,504.33 253. Maharashtra Kalmeshwar Sewerage 2,076.74 254. Maharashtra Gondia Sewerage 12,571.77 255. Maharashtra Aurangabad Sewerage 36,568.89 256. Maharashtra Katol Sewerage 4,261.00 257. Maharashtra Dhule Water Supply 12,412.00 258. Maharashtra Kolhapur Water Supply 42,541.00 259. Maharashtra Rahata Water Supply 1,404.20 260. Maharashtra Sinner Water Supply 6,632.03 261. Maharashtra Shrigonda Water Supply 4,823.92 262. Maharashtra Ichalakaranji Sewerage 8,260.20 263. Madhya Pradesh Aagar Water Supply 1,005.80 264. Madhya Pradesh Aastha Water Supply 980.40 265. Madhya Pradesh Aastha Road 541.28 266. Madhya Pradesh Amarwara Road 424.16 94

12 3 4 5 267. Madhya Pradesh Aathner Water Supply 1,309.90 268. Madhya Pradesh Amla Road 477.66 269. Madhya Pradesh Amarwara Water Supply 1,609.30 270. Madhya Pradesh Athner Road 217.90 271. Madhya Pradesh Amarwara Solid Waste 128.80 Management 272. Madhya Pradesh Anuppur Water Supply 1,521.22 273. Madhya Pradesh Badi Water Supply 785.60 274. Madhya Pradesh Betul Water Supply 3,262.07 275. Madhya Pradesh Bina Water Supply 3,875.50 276. Madhya Pradesh Budni Sewerage 195.05 277. Madhya Pradesh Budni Road 504.20 278. Madhya Pradesh Chandameta Road 321.30 279. Madhya Pradesh Chhindwara Water Supply 5,732.87 280. Madhya Pradesh Baihar Road 405.61 281. Madhya Pradesh Chourai Water Supply 886.38 282. Madhya Pradesh Chourai Road 189.17 283. Madhya Pradesh Baikunthpur Water Supply 732.75 284. Madhya Pradesh Dabra Water Supply 1,441.84 285. Madhya Pradesh Damua Road 652.52 286. Madhya Pradesh Dewas Phase-II Water Supply 3,975.00 287. Madhya Pradesh Dongar Parasia Water Supply 3,013.33 288. Madhya Pradesh Dongar Parasia Road 1,098.03 289. Madhya Pradesh Garhakota Water Supply 596.36 290. Madhya Pradesh Balaghat Water Supply 4,283.00 291. Madhya Pradesh Gwalior Sewerage 6,650.00 292. Madhya Pradesh Harrai Road 177.27 293. Madhya Pradesh Baldeogarh Water Supply 1,264.80 294. Madhya Pradesh Itarsi Water Supply 1,467.83 295. Madhya Pradesh Itarsi Sewerage 708.43 95

12 3 4 5 296. Madhya Pradesh Itarsi Road 844.57 297. Madhya Pradesh Junardeo Road 345.96 298. Madhya Pradesh Barkuhi Water Supply 1,211.82 299. Madhya Pradesh Katni Water Supply 4,080.95 300. Madhya Pradesh Khirkiya Water Supply 1,225.70 301. Madhya Pradesh Khurai Water Supply 3,662.82 302. Madhya Pradesh Khurai Road 457.60 303. Madhya Pradesh Mahidpur Water Supply 1,683.75 304. Madhya Pradesh Barwaha Water Supply 1,704.96 305. Madhya Pradesh Begamganj Water Supply 1,392.22 306. Madhya Pradesh Multai Water Supply 1,929.60 307. Madhya Pradesh Multai Road 723.34 308. Madhya Pradesh Narsulaganji Road 365.39 309. Madhya Pradesh Pandhurna Road 2,054.76 310. Madhya Pradesh Pandhurna Water Supply 4,611.62 311. Madhya Pradesh Pipariya Water Supply 2,408.11 312. Madhya Pradesh Pipariya Road 385.46 313. Madhya Pradesh Piplanaraynwar Road 408.09 314. Madhya Pradesh Piplanaraynwar Water Supply 81.20 315. Madhya Pradesh Bhaisdehi Road 483 316. Madhya Pradesh Ratlam Water Supply 3,265.10 317. Madhya Pradesh Rehti Sewerage 143.48 318. Madhya Pradesh Rehti Road 211.60 319. Madhya Pradesh Bhedaghat Road 603.40 320. Madhya Pradesh Sagar Sewerage 7,661.55 321. Madhya Pradesh Chachaura- Road 134.27 Binaganj 322. Madhya Pradesh Sausar Water Supply 1,930.22 323 Madhya Pradesh Sausar Road 2,332.73 324. Madhya Pradesh Chandameta Water Supply 1,432.20 96

12 3 4 5 325. Madhya Pradesh Shajapur Water Supply 996.00 326. Madhya Pradesh Shamgarh Water Supply 2,374.00 327. Madhya Pradesh Chanderi Road 614.85 328. Madhya Pradesh Shivpuri Water Supply 5,964.66 329. Madhya Pradesh Shujalpur Water Supply 1,745.32 330. Madhya Pradesh Shujalpur Road 499.00 331. Madhya Pradesh Sidhi Water Supply 2,118.55 332. Madhya Pradesh Chhindwara Road 5,352.70 333. Madhya Pradesh Vidisha Water Supply 1,557.52 334. Madhya Pradesh Waraseoni Road 810.96 335. Madhya Pradesh Waraseoni Water Supply 2,232.00 336. Madhya Pradesh Chhindwara Road 1,245.82 337. Madhya Pradesh Chicholi Road 200.00 338. Madhya Pradesh Chindwara Water Supply 382.87 339. Madhya Pradesh Barkuhi Road 476.42 340. Madhya Pradesh Chindwara Road 2,736.76 341. Madhya Pradesh Chitrakoot Water Supply 1,319.68 342. Madhya Pradesh Churhat Road 232.10 343. Madhya Pradesh Dahi Water Supply 931.80 344. Madhya Pradesh Damoh Phase-II Water Supply 3,715.95 345. Madhya Pradesh Damua Water Supply 1,479.19 346. Madhya Pradesh Damua Road 611.30 347. Madhya Pradesh Deori Water Supply 2,301.68 348. Madhya Pradesh Dewas Sewerage 14,062.53 349. Madhya Pradesh Suwasara Water Supply 1,764.30 350. Madhya Pradesh Dongar Parsia Road 1,206.37 351. Madhya Pradesh Singoli Road 264.71 352. Madhya Pradesh Lodhikhera Road 417.33 353. Madhya Pradesh Sonkutch Road 499.00 354. Madhya Pradesh Mohgaon Road 462.18 97

12 3 4 5 355. Madhya Pradesh Piplarawa Road 364.70 356. Madhya Pradesh Newtonchikli Road 604.25 357. Madhya Pradesh Guna Water Supply 7,140.42 358. Madhya Pradesh Harreai Water Supply 873.87 359. Madhya Pradesh Dewas Road 1,254.50 360. Madhya Pradesh Mandleshwar Road 659.08 361. Madhya Pradesh Katni Road 4,567.00 362. Madhya Pradesh Mungaoli Road 550.00 363. Madhya Pradesh Kolaras Road 1,234.03 364. Madhya Pradesh Harrai Road 324.93 365. Madhya Pradesh Hindoria Water Supply 1,138.34 366. Madhya Pradesh Isagarh Road 629.40 367. Madhya Pradesh Jiran Water Supply 549.92 368. Madhya Pradesh Jnuuardeo/Jamai Water Supply 2,432.07 369. Madhya Pradesh Kareli Road 444.47 370. Madhya Pradesh Kareli Water Supply 3,550.77 371. Madhya Pradesh Kolar Water Supply 5,210.42 372. Madhya Pradesh Kotma Water Supply 1,799.58 373. Madhya Pradesh Lakhandaon Road 519.37 374. Madhya Pradesh Lanjhi Road 815.88 375. Madhya Pradesh Lanjhi Water Supply 1,825.00 376. Madhya Pradesh Lodhikeda Water Supply 611.76 377. Madhya Pradesh Malanjkhand Road 829.43 378. Madhya Pradesh Malhargarh Water Supply 548.92 379. Madhya Pradesh Manawar Road 475.15 380. Madhya Pradesh Manawar Water Supply 1,125.60 381. Madhya Pradesh Mandla Road 133.22 382. Madhya Pradesh Mandleshwar Water Supply 799.29 383. Madhya Pradesh Mandsaur Water Supply 5,636.37 384. Madhya Pradesh Mohgaon Water Supply 848.87 98

12 3 4 5

385. Madhya Pradesh Mungaoli Water Supply 1,070.40 386. Madhya Pradesh Neemuch Water Supply 1,545.98 387. Madhya Pradesh Newton Chikli Road 163.30 388. Madhya Pradesh Newton Chikli Water Supply 1,055,90 389. Madhya Pradesh Panduma Road 2,063.75 390. Madhya Pradesh Patan Road 329.60 391. Madhya Pradesh Pipalrawa Water Supply 964.22 392. Madhya Pradesh Piplanarayanwar Water Supply 773.34 393. Madhya Pradesh Piplya mandi Water Supply 968.72 394. Madhya Pradesh Piplya mandi Road 487.50 395. Madhya Pradesh Porsa Solid, Waste 236.47 Management 396. Madhya Pradesh Porsa Water Supply 959.25 397. Madhya Pradesh Prithvipur Road 504.80 398. Madhya Pradesh Rajgarh Water Supply 1.907.76 399. Madhya Pradesh Rajpur Road 489.00 400. Madhya Pradesh Rampura Water Supply 1,956.37 401. Madhya Pradesh Sabalgarh Road 459.10 402. Madhya Pradesh Sabalgarh Storm Water Drainage 980.94 403. Madhya Pradesh Satna Water Supply 8,087.57 404. Madhya Pradesh Satwas Water Supply 1,397.40 405. Madhya Pradesh Seoni Water Supply 4,735.80 406. Madhya Pradesh Shahganj Water Supply 436.45 407. Madhya Pradesh Shahganj Road 477.96 408. Madhya Pradesh Shahpura Water Supply 1,368.66 409. Madhya Pradesh Shamshahbad Water Supply 882.47 410. Madhya Pradesh Shivpuri Solid Waste 649.76 Management 411. Madhya Pradesh Singrauli Water Supply 7,795.24 412. Madhya Pradesh Sirmaur Water Supply 980.00 99

12 3 4 5 413. Madhya Pradesh Tendukheda Water Supply 1.028.64 414. Manipur Kakching Water Supply 1,327.00 415. Manipur Jiribam Water Supply 576.00 416. Manipur Mairang Water Supply 1,779.00 417. Meghalaya Tura Solid Waste 833.10 Management 418. Meghalaya Nangpoh Solid Waste 600.16 Management 419. Nagaland Chumukedima Road 423.89 420. Nagaland Mon Road 1,901.93 421. Nagaland Dimapur Road 310.00 (Tenyiphe-I area) 422. Orissa Angul Water Supply 1,273.32 423. Orissa Bargarh Water Supply 3,033.00 424. Orissa Berhampur Water Board 1,665.89 425. Orissa Bhawanipatana Water Supply 972.00 426. Orissa Cuttack Road 5,074.12 427. Orissa Gadakha Urban Renewal 1,724.98 (Cuttack) 428. Orissa Jajpur Water Body 225.92 429. Orissa Jharsuguda Water Supply 3,196.11 430. Orissa Nayagarh Water Supply 2,048.66 431. Orissa Paralakhemundi Water Supply 527.74 432. Orissa Phulbani Water Supply 748.45 433. Orissa Sambalpur Sewerage 593.23 434. Orissa Talcher Water Suply 1,069.00 435. Orissa Vyasanagar Water Supply 1,429.87 436. Orissa Cuttack Phase-1 Water Supply 6,865.00 437. Orissa Choudwar Water Supply 990.87 Phase-1 438. Orissa Rourkela Water Supply 7,705.57 100

12 3 4 5 439. Orissa Baripada Water Supply 5,378.00 440. Orissa Sambalpur Water Supply 3,881.49 Phase-II 441. Punjab Bathinda Water Supply 2,642.00 442. Punjab Ferozpur Water Supply 834.00 443. Punjab Jalandhar Sewerage 4,696.85 444. Punjab Malout Sewerage 2,286.00 445. Punjab Muktasar Water Supply 1,541.08 446. Punjab Muktasar Sewerage 2,789.45 447. Punjab Pathankot Sewerage 4,766.00 448. Punjab Patiala Sewerage 8,940.00 449. Punjab Sunam Water Supply 207.00 450. Rajasthan Bikaner Sewerage 3,876.10 451. Rajasthan Hanumangarh Sewerage 4,279.00 452. Rajasthan Jhalawar and Sewerage 1,904.02 Jhalarpatan 453. Rajasthan Jhun Jhunu Sewerage 3,781.00 454. Rajasthan Jodhpur Sewerage 6,167.00 455. Rajasthan Kishangarh Sewerage 2,601.00 456. Rajasthan Kota Sewerage 5,122.42 457. Rajasthan Makarna Water Supply 4,870.41 458. Rajasthan Mangrole Storm Water Drainage 292.30 459. Rajasthan Mount Abu Sewerage 2,715.00 460. Rajasthan Mount Abu Storm Water Drainage 422.00 461. Rajasthan Pali Sewerage 3,329.53 462. Rajasthan Sardarshahar Sewerage 3,692.00 463. Rajasthan Sikar City Road 374.67 464. Rajasthan Udaipur Water Supply 5,395.00 465. Rajasthan Chirawa Phase-I Sewerage 6,314.32 466. Rajasthan Laxmangarh Sewerage 6,963.55 101

12 3 4 5 467. Rajasthan Nawalgarh Sewerage 8,211.28 Phase-I 468. Rajasthan Suratgarh Phase-I Sewerage 7,547.64 469. Rajasthan Nimbaheda Sewerage 7,773.21 470. Rajasthan Jaitaran Sewerage 3,471.06 471. Rajasthan Bhadra Phase-I Sewerage 8,932.70 472. Rajasthan Kekri Water Supply 941 473. Rajasthan Badi Sadri Sewerage 2151.23 474. Rajasthan Ramgarh Sewerage 4489.24 Sekhawati 475. Rajasthan Fatehnagar- Sewerage 3674.93 Sanawar-I 476. Rajasthan Kushalgarh Sewerage 4153.56 477. Sikkim Namchi Sewerage 1,097.00 478. Sikkim Jorethang Sewerage 480.00 479. Sikkim Rangpo Sewerage 494.00 480. Tamil Nadu Ariyalur Sewerage 2,555.20 481. Tamil Nadu Attur Water Supply 458.97 482. Tamil Nadu Avelalapatty Water Supply 347.30 483. Tamil Nadu Chettipalayam Water Supply 71.07 484. Tamil Nadu Chidambaram Water Supply 615.60 485. Tamil Nadu Cumbum Water Supply 1,852.65 486. Tamil Nadu Dharapuram Water Supply 918.29 487. Tamil Nadu Kayalpattinam Water Supply 2,967.00 488. Tamil Nadu Kovilpatti Water Supply 7,060.14 489. Tamil Nadu Nagercoil Sewerage 6,556.47 490. Tamil Nadu Samalpuram Water Supply 337.87 491. Tamil Nadu Thiruchendur Sewerage 1,122.00 492. Tamil Nadu Thiruchengode Water Supply 603.55 493. Tamil Nadu Udumalpet Sewerage 3,034.23 494. Tamil Nadu Vandavasi Water Supply 930.62 102

12 3 4 5

495. Tamil Nadu Vellakoil Water Supply 947.06 496. Tamil Nadu Mettur Sewerage 5.651.66 497. Tamil Nadu Thirupathur Sewerage 7,682.91 498. Tamil Nadu Arakkonam Sewerage 7,745.16 499. Tamil Nadu Jolarpet Sewerage 3,399.48 500. Tamil Nadu Chidambaram Sewerage 5,738.37 501. Tamil Nadu Sattur Sewerage 2,957.53 502. Tamil Nadu Periakulam Sewerage 1,712.92 503. Tamil Nadu Kengeyam Water Supply 1,423,71 504. Tamil Nadu Arani Water Supply 3,228.05 505. Tamil Nadu Periakulam Water Supply 1,349.68 506. Tamil Nadu Thiruvathipuram Water Supply 1,121.41 507. Tamil Nadu Tindivanam Water Supply 4,506.91 508. Tamil Nadu Kodaikanal Water Supply 4,223.00 509. Tripura Kaliashar Road 1,511.28 510. Uttar Pradesh Amethi Water Supply 999.68 511. Uttar Pradesh Auraiya Water Supply 4,120.87 512. Uttar Pradesh Azamgarh Water Supply 458.34 513. Uttar Pradesh Badaun Solid Waste 578.45 Management 514. Uttar Pradesh Ballia Solid Waste 681.66 Management 515. Uttar Pradesh Ballia Sewerage 4,472.31 516. Uttar Pradesh Bareily Water Supply 7,800.04 517. Uttar Pradesh Basti Road 2,376.94 518. Uttar Pradesh Basti Solid Waste 586.11 Management 519. Uttar Pradesh Deoria Water Supply 1,104.06 520. Uttar Pradesh Faizabad Water Supply 1,880.82 521. Uttar Pradesh Firozabad Sewerage 8,691.66 103

12 3 4 5

522. Uttar Pradesh Firozabad Solid Waste 713.50 Management 523. Uttar Pradesh Ghaziabad Road 9,087.67 524. Uttar Pradesh Ghaziabad Water Supply 3,108.12 525. Uttar Pradesh Gorakhpur Solid Waste 1,563.60 Management 526. Uttar Pradesh Jaunpur Solid Waste 1,220.39 Management 527. Uttar Pradesh Jhansi Solid Waste 1,216.00 Management 528. Uttar Pradesh Kasaya Water Supply 1,045.23 529. Uttar Pradesh Loni Solid Waste 1,181.28 Management 530. Uttar Pradesh Mau Water Supply 555.93 531. Uttar Pradesh Mirzapur Solid Waste 1,100.87 Management 532. Uttar Pradesh Muzaffarnagar Water Supply 3,214.33 533. Uttar Pradesh Rae Bareily Water Supply 10,618.46 534. Uttar Pradesh Sambhal Solid Waste 655.09 Management 535. Uttar Pradesh Sultanpur Water Supply 3,369.29 536. Uttar Pradesh Vrindavan Sewerage 3,463.00 537. Uttar Pradesh Ghaziabad Water Supply 7,383.14 538. Uttar Pradesh Gorakhpur part-II Water Supply 4,830.90 539. Uttarakhand Mussoori Sewerage 6,173.25 540. Uttarakhand Haldwani Solid Waste 3,488.00 Management 541. Uttarakhand Rishikesh Heritage 1,765.60 542. Uttarakhand Nandprayag Road 95.55 543. Uttarakhand Kamaprayag Road 220.77 544. Uttarakhand Rudraprayag Road 506.25 545. Uttarakhand Muni Ki reti Storm Water Drainage 94.01 104

12 3 4 5

546. Uttarakhand Narendranagar Road 485.04 547. Uttarakhand Purola Road 420.02 548. Uttarakhand Joshimath Road 730.88 549. Uttarakhand Barkot Road 510.76 550. Uttarakhand Uttarkashi Road 454.30 551. Uttarakhand Mangalaur Water Supply 3,587.00 552. Uttarakhand Gopeshwar Road 718.18 553. West Bengal Balughat Water Supply 4,160.24 554. West Bengal Balughat Storm Water Drainage 1,535.90 555. West Bengal Berhampur Water Supply 1,270.00 556. West Bengal Chandrakona Water Supply 1,557.29 557. West Bengal Coochbehar Water Supply 3,634.84 558. West Bengal Dhuliyan Water Supply 2,062.64 559. West Bengal Diamond HarbourWater Supply 3,479.90 560. West Bengal Egra Water Supply 1,496.78 561. West Bengal Englishbazar Water Supply 4,140.00 562. West Bengal Kandi Water Supply 3,740.29 563. West Bengal Kurseong Sewerage 1,251.59 564. West Bengal Old Malda Water Supply 1,819.86 565. West Bengal Raiganj Water Supply 4,401,23 566. West Bengal Sainthia Water Supply 1,299.62 567. West Bengal Shantipur Water Supply 1,724.00 568. West Bengal Siliguri Water Supply 2,271.00 569. West Bengal Suri Water Supply 965.73 570. West Bengal Joynagar- Water Supply 1,866.28 Mazlipur 571. West Bengal Dubrajpur Water Supply 2,316.75 572. West Bengal Panskura Water Supply 3,525.10 573. West Bengal Kalna Water Supply 2,793.66 574. West Bengal Ranaghat Water Supply 6,402.91 105

12 3 4 5 575. West Bengal Nabadwip Water Supply 7,851.68 576. Andaman & Jungleeghat Road 558.13 Nicobar Islands 577. Dadar & Nagar Silvassa/Amli Water Supply 1,864.73 Haveli 578. Daman & Diu Moti & Nandi Sewerage 942.37 Daman APPENDIX XVI GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO. 459 ANSWERED ON 25.02.2015 Common Secretariat 459. SHRI ASHWINI KUMAR: Will the Minister of URBAN DEVELOPMENT be pleased to state: (a) whether Government has identified any site for the proposed common Secretariat building in Delhi; (b) if so, the details thereof and the current status of the proposal; and (c) if not the reasons therefor and the time by which a final decision is likely to be taken in this regard? ANSWER THE MINISTER OF STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF HOUSING AND URBAN POVERTY ALLEVIATION (SH. BABUL SUPRIYO): (a) No, Madam. (b) Doest not arise. (c) Various alternative sites are under consideration of the Government.

106 APPENDIX XVII GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT LOK SABHA STARRED QUESTION NO. 121 ANSWERED ON 04.03.2015 Utilisation of Funds for Urban Development 121. SHRI RAMEN DEKA: SHRI RAVNEET SINGH: Will the Minister of URBAN DEVELOPMENT be pleased to state: (a) the funds allocated and utilized for the urban development schemes during the last three years and the current year, year-wise and scheme-wise; (b) whether large sum of allocations made to states for urban development remained unspent and if so, the details thereof along with the reasons therefor, State and scheme/project-wise; (c) whether any mechanism has been put in place to monitor the utilization of funds allocated to States and if so, the details thereof along with the steps taken/ proposed to be taken to strengthen the mechanism; and (d) the steps taken to make urban local bodies more efficient and empowered to pitch for funds and its utilization? ANSWER THE MINISTER OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT (SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU): (a) to (d) A statement is laid on the Table of the House. STATEMENT STATEMENT REFERRED TO IN REPLY TO THE LOK SABHA STARRED QUESTION NO. 121 FOR 04.03.2015 REGARDING "UTILISATION OF FUNDS FOR URBAN DEVELOPMENT". (a) and (b) The details of funds allocated and utilized for the following Urban Development Schemes during the last three years & current year, is given in Annexure-I:— (i) Under Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JNNURM); (ii) Urban Infrastructure Development in Satellite towns around seven Mega Cities (UIDSST) scheme, 10% lump sum scheme and NERUDP Scheme; (iii) Swachh Bharat Mission; (iv) Metro Rail projects. 107 108

The National Heritage City Development and Augmentation Yojana (HRIDAY), was officially launched on 21st January, 2015. An outlay of Rs. 200 crore has been earmarked under HRIDAY for the current financial year out of which Rs. 87 lakh has been released till 28.02.2015. During the period 2011-12 to 2013-14, under the aforesaid Schemes, projects are funded as per the respective scheme guidelines in the form of Additional Central Assistant (ACA) and remaining funds are arranged by the States and Urban Local Bodies (ULBs)/Parastatals. Subsequent installment of ACA is released for projects subject to utilization of grants and other conditionalities like achievement of reforms according to the timelines agreed to by the States and ULBs for JNNURM. Hence, question of large amount being unspent does not arise. The reasons for delay in projects during this period are mainly due to capacity constraints of implementing agencies, issues related to land acquisition, problems of contract management at ULB level. During the current financial year, for the new schemes on 100 Smart Cities & New Urban Development Mission, extensive consultations with State Governments and various stakeholders were done. The Schemes are in final stages of design and will be launched soon. (c) Under each different scheme, guidelines have put in place a number of mechanisms to monitor the utilization of funds to State such as:— (i) Regular review and Monitoring at the level of Ministry and state Government by various committees constituted under the specific scheme. (ii) Third party review and monitoring. (iii) Quarterly progress reports submitted by implementing agencies. (iv) Utilization certificates and reports by competent authorities at state level. (d) Regular capacity building programme of the Ministry are aimed towards making ULB's efficient and empowered. JNNURM was a reform linked programme undertaken by the Government of India. Most of the reforms were aimed to make ULB's more efficient and to empower them for better funds utilization. There were 23 reforms identified for implementation, both at State and ULB level, the details of reforms and achievement are at Annexures-II & III. 109 105** Expdn. (Rs. in crore) 0.000.00 0.00 ANNEXURE I ture upto Expendi- % 20.2.2015 0 Smart Cities. tion 200.00 Alloca- 1690.5* Expdn. 0.00 ture Expendi % 0.00 0.00 tion Alloca- Expdn. ture Expendi % 3754.99 - 7191.14 5438.74 - 1020.36 1072.43 tion 5280 Alloca- Expdn. ture Expendi- % 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 tion Allocation and Expenditure for the last 4 years Urban Development Schemes (RE) (RE) (RE) (RE) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Alloca- 58.20 42.6270.00 73.23 69.58 30.00 99.40 29.95 30.00 99.83 24.02 50.00 80.07 48.78 70.00 97.56 69.03 244.30 98.61 131.21 82.00 53.71 82.20 100.24 164.00 164.00 100.00 145.55 109.98 75.56 150.00 124.81 83.21 150.00 137.85 91.90 5575.08 5454.52 - 5267.27 5255.95 99.79 5054.63 4865.80 96.26 5759.91 5528.26 95.98 6167.78 5577.53 90.43 Mission Development) Scheme Provision for North Eastern States Region Urban Development Programme (Satellite towns) *Provision is provided in 1st Batch of supplementary Demands for Grants 2014-15 and re-appropriation is process. *Provision is provided **The expenditure is marginally higher with reference to RE but within BE, Provision for 2014-15 includes New Mission 10 7. Swachh Bharat 4. UIDSST 5. Metro Rail 6. Hriday (Heritage 1. JNNURM 2. 10% Lumpsum 3. North Eastern ANNEXURE II

Sl. No. State Level Reforms 1. Implementation of 74th CAA 2. Integration of City Planning & Delivery Functions 3. Reform in Rent Control 4. Stamp duty rationalization to 5% 5. Repeal of ULCRA 6. Enactment of Community Participation Law 7. Enactment of Public Disclosure Law ULB Level Reforms 1. e-Governance 2. Shift to Accrual based Double Entry Accounting 3. Property Tax (85% Coverage & 90% Collection Efficiency) 4. 100% cost recovery (Water Supply & SWM) 5. Internal Earmarking of Funds for Services to Urban Poor 6. Provision of Basic Services to Urban Poor Optional Reforms 1. Revision of Building Bye laws—To make rain water harvesting mandatory 2. Revision of Building Bye laws—streamlining the Approval Process 3. Bye laws on Reuse of Recycled Water 4. Simplification of Legal and Procedural framework for conversion of agricultural land for non-agricultural purposes 5. Introduction of computerized process of Registration of land and Property 6. Encouraging PPP 7. Earmarking 25% developed land in all housing projects for EWS/LIG 8. Administrative Reforms 9. Structural Reforms 10. Introduction of Property Title Certification System in municipalities

110 ANNEXURE III Reform achievement status as on March, 2014 Sl. No. State ULB Level State Level Optional Level Overall Score 1. Andhra Pradesh 95 96 90 93.3 2. Arunachal Pradesh 34 86 82 70.3 3. Assam 62 93 86 81.6 4. Bihar 69 73 73 72 5. Chandigarh 72 95 91 87.3 6. Chhattisgarh 89 94 88 89.9 7. Delhi 84 93 83 86.3 8. Goa 67 84 93 83.3 9. Gujarat 92 91 96 93.5 10. Haryana 77 71 74 74. 11. Himachal Pradesh 77 100 95 91.7 12. Jammu & Kashmir 76 93 95 89.3 13. Jharkhand 56 86 63 68.5 14. Karnataka 97 97 95 96.1 15. Kerala 99 93 90 93.3 16. Madhya Pradesh 88 86 85 85.9 17. Maharashtra 99 100 100 99.8 18. Manipur 22 59 60 49.8 19. Meghalaya 79 76 58 68.6 20. Mizoram 51 89 80 75.2 21. Nagaland 7 79 43 44.3 22. Odisha 75 79 79 77.8 23. Puducherry 63 93 88 82.8 24. Punjab 82 93 90 88.8 25. Rajasthan 78 93 87 86.5 26. Sikkim 44 69 58 57.6 27. Tamil Nadu 99.5 99 100 99.6 28. Telangana 99 96 90 94.3 29. Tripura 73 88 64 73.5 30. Uttar Pradesh 85 90 88 88 31. Uttarakhand 70 86 79 78.7 32. West Bengal 82 77 100 88.3 Overall Score 80 87 86 84

111 112

SHRI RAMEN DEKA (MANGALDAI): Thank you, Madam This is my first chance to ask a Question as I always miss my chance due to adjournment. The reply of the hon. Minister is elaborate but I still want to ask a question to the hon. Minister through you. I would like to know whether the Government has any proposal to inquire into the utilization of fund under JNNURM in Guwahati and other Municipal Boards in Assam as there are allegations of mis-utilisation of this fund. Jh ,eñ oasdS;k uk;Mw% v/;{k th] ,d LisflfQd loky ekuuh; lnL; us iwNk gS] vHkh esjs ikl ,slh fdlh f'kdk;r dh tkudkjh ugha gS] exj vle ls ts,u,u;wvkj,e ds lanHkZ esa dksbZ f'kdk;r vk,xh rks eSa mls ns[kwaxk vkSj vxj f'kdk;r xaHkhj gqbZ rks t:j mlds Åij buDok;jh djk ysaxsA

SHRI RAMEN DEKA (MANGALDAI): Rain is a major problem in Assam. Due to rain there are fresh floods in all the urban areas, especially in my constituency Mangaldai, Nalbari, Guwahati. I would like to know whether the Government has any paln to overcome fresh floods due to rain in urban areas of Assam. SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU: Madam, Speaker, it is a general question. It is a fact that because of Brahmaputra and because of heavy rains frequent floods are affecting the State of Assam, more particularly Guwahati city. That being the case, if the State Government has some definite proposal, we will consider whether it fits within our scheme or has to be tackled by the Water Resources Ministry because water resource subject is allotted to that particular Ministry. The hon. Member should first take up the issue with the State Government and then if there is some specific proposal the concerned Ministry will get it examined. Whatever support the Ministry of Urban Development can extend, we will extend it. Jh jouhr flag ¼yqf/k;kuk½% v/;{k egksn;] tokgjyky usg: us'kuy vcZu fjU;wvy fe'ku ;wih,&1 ljdkj us fnlacj] 2005 esa lkr o"kks± ds fy, 'kq: fd;k FkkA ckn esa mls nks lky ds fy, vkSj c<+k;k x;k] ekpZ] 2014 rd c<+k;k x;kA blds v/khu izkstsDV~l esa okVj lIykbZ] lSfuVs'ku] lhojst] lkWfyM osLV eSustesaV] jksM usVodZ] vcZu VªkaliksVZ vkfn vge izkstsDV~l 'kgjksa ds fy, FksA vcZu baQzkLVªDpj MsoyiesaV Ldhe esa NksVs VkmUl ds fy, 6607 djksM+ #i;s ls vf/kd /ku ljdkj us rhu o"kks± esa fn,A blds v/khu fofHkUu jkT;ksa ,oa fefuLVªht us 3384 djksM+ #i;s [kpZ fd,A baQzkLVªDpj ,aM xous±l ij] ;w-vkbZ-th- Ldhe esa 3]442 djksM+ #i;s 2011 ls 2014 rd fn, x,A mlesa ls 923 djksM+ #i;s [kpZ fd, x,A ;fn ,sls gh eSa lkjs ns'k dh fLFkfr dh ckr d:a] [kkldj eSa vius lalnh; {ks= yqf/k;kuk dh ckr d:a rks cgqr cM+h jde ljdkj us 'kgjksa ds fy, nh FkhA ysfdu vkt dbZ izkstsDV~l pkgs lhojst dk gks] jksM dk gks ;k ;krk;kr ;kfu clksa dk gks] os lkjs izkstsDV~l dgha u dgha v/kwjs iM+s gSaA blls cgqr cM+k [krjk cu x;k gS] D;ksafd dHkh bl ckjs esa dksbZ Li"Vhdj.k ugha vk;kA fyf[kr tokc esa Hkh crk;k x;k gS fd jkT;ksa ds lkFk ppkZ gks jgh gSA eSa iwNuk pkgrk gwa fd vc dkSu&lh Ldhe ljdkj cukus tk jgh gS\ eSa dguk pkgrk gwa fd bl 113 ;kstuk ds rgr dbZ gtkj djksM+ #i;ksa dh LdhEl 'kq: dh xbZ Fkha] os dgha chp esa u jg tk,aA blfy, eSa ljdkj ls tkuuk pkgrk gwa fd os LdhEl dc iwjh gksaxh\ ekuuh; v/;{k% LdhEl ds dEIyh'kal ds fy, tkuuk pkgrs gSaA Jh jouhr flag ¼yqf/k;kuk½% eSa ;g Hkh tkuuk pkgrk gwa fd tks LdhEl iwjh gks pqdh gSa] muds j[k&j[kko ds fy, D;k ljdkj dksbZ iSlk nsxh\ var esa eSa ,d ckr vkSj iwNuk pkgrk gwaA ekuuh; v/;{k% vkidk ,d iwjd iz'u gks x;k gSA Jh jouhr flag ¼yqf/k;kuk½% gekjs :jy ,fj;kt esa foftysal ekfuVfjax desVht gSaA mlesa lkaln vkSj fo/kk;d lnL; gSaA gekjh gkml desVh us Hkh QSlyk fd;k gS vkSj dgk gS fd D;ksa ugha 'kgjksa ds fy, Hkh foftysal ekfuVfjax desVh cukbZ tkrh] tks ,d&,d ikbZ dk fglkc j[k ldsaA eSa le>rk gwa fd bl ckr ls lkjk lnu Hkh lger gksxkA ;gka ij iz/kku ea=h th Hkh ekStwn gSaA eSa ea=h th ls iwNuk pkgrk gwa fd vcZu ,fj;k ds fy, Hkh D;k foftysal ekfuVfjax desVh cukus ij vki fopkj djsaxs\ Jh ,eñ oSadS¸;k uk;Mw% v/;{k th] tSlk fd ekuuh; lnL; us dgk] eSa crkuk pkgrk gwa fd ;g izksxzke 2005 esa 'kq: fd;k x;k FkkA lu~ 2012 esa ;g ;kstuk lekIr gks xbZ FkhA mlds ckn bls ,d lky ds fy, vkSj ,DlVsaM fd;k x;kA fQj mlds ckn pquko ds nkSjku bls ,d lky dk vkSj ,DlVsa'ku fn;k x;kA mlesa ;g 'krZ j[kh xbZ fd tks LdhEl eatwj dh xbZ gSa] muds fy, iSlk fjyht fd;k tk,xkA mu LdhEl dks 31 ekpZ] 2014 rd iwjk gksuk pkfg, vkSj ;fn os mDr vof/k rd iwjh ugha gksrha rks mudh vkxs dh ns[kHkky izns'k ljdkj dks djuh pkfg,A ;g fu.kZ; ml le; dh ljdkj us rc fy;k Fkk vkSj ;g rF; gSA I am not trying to escape from the responsibility of the present Government but that was the decision taken at that time. The schemes sanctioned during that period have to be completed by 31st March, 2014. That is the factual position. With regard to incomplete works, as the hon. Member has rightly said, there are incomplete works in a number of States and the States are supposed to take care of them. But the States are not in a position to take care of them. That is what the States are saying. They have been coming and meeting me. They have also been writing letters to me. But with the recent increase of funds to the State Governments by the Finance Commission and also with the additional resources made available by the Finance Commission to urban local bodies, this has to be taken care of by the States. In addition to this, what the Centre can do, we are examining it. In between came the recommendation of the Finance Commission and much of the money have gone to States. To be frank, my counterparts in the States have become rich and comparatively I have become poor. I have no problem because it is a policy and my Prime Minister is very keen to see that the States have to be strengthened. Lastly, what the hon. Member has said is very important. As the Minister of Rural Development, I insisted that there has to be a monitoring and review committee chaired by the Member of Parliament of that particular area. He has given a suggestion 114 for doing it in the urban areas also. At present, only the officers are monitoring them and then I have to answer it in Parliament. Therefore, I shall positively consider this suggestion of making the MPs also as the co-Chairmen because there has to be an official also for the monitoring committee of the cities which fall in their constituency. SHRI P.R. SUNDARAM (NAMAKKAL): Hon. Speaker, Madam, Tamil Nadu has obtained first place in achievement status with regard to utilization of funds for urban development. Guided by our Puratchi Thalaivi Amma, optimal level achievement of Tamil Nadu is 100 per cent. In the State level performance, Tamil Nadu stands first with 99 per cent. Hon. Minister's reply refers to this. I want to know whether such well-performing States like Tamil Nadu will be rewarded by way of providing more number of 'Smart Cities'. SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU: Madam Speaker, I have no hesitation in accepting the fact that Tamil Nadu is one the better performing States as far as Urban Development is concerned. I had an occasion to review the performance during my visit to Chennai where I had an occasion to meet the then Chief Minister Ms. Jayalalitha. I have publicly accepted it also. It is because there should be an example to other States also. There are some other States also which have done well. Madam, with regard to the sanction of smart cities, naturally the performing States has to be encouraged. We will keep this in mind. The problem is that the smart cities are not going to be allocated. The smart city concept is at the stage of finalization and there will be a city challenging system where the cities, whether they will be eligible or not, will be decided depending on their performance, depending on their credit warthiness and depending on their willingness to get reformed. All these factors are there. When it comes to selecting cities from the State of Tamil Nadu, definitely the point of view of the State will be kept in mind. SHRI B. VINOD KUMAR (KARIMNAGAR): Madam Speaker, the hon. Minister has replied in detail. I would like to ask the hon. Minister whether the scheme, the Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Revewal Mission, will continue which was launched by the earlier Government. I would like to know whether this Government will continue this project or not. If the Government proposes to continue with the scheme, I would like to know from the Minister whether the Government is proposing to relax the criteria, Earlier, the cities with with 10 lakh population were considered under the scheme. 63 cities were considered. If the Government is proposing to continue with the scheme, I would like to know whether they propose to relax the conditions so that many other cities can also come under the purview of this scheme. I would also like to know from the hon. Minister whether the cities which were already under this Mission would once again be considered under smart cities, or the cities which were considered under Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission will be deleted in order to see that more new cities could come under the purview of the smart cities. SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU: Madam, as I mentioned, the scheme was initiated in 2005 and was supposed to be completed by 2012. The then Government 115 had given two extensions, one up to 2013 and another up to 2014 and then it was said that it will come to an end. This was earlier envisaged by the Planning Commission. The present Government is considering launching a new Mission for Urban Rejuvenation which has been mentioned in the Budget also. In that scheme, as has been rightly mentioned by the hon. Member, the criteria for major citieis is not 10 lakhs and above. The Government now is considering to include cities which are one lakh and above. That means the number will go to 500. With further clarification with regard to the smart cities, some of the cities could become eligible for consideration as smart cities. It is because a smart city is going to be on PPP model. It is not a Government funded scheme. Government will definitely participate but will be on PPP model. When cities become eligible, they will be taken out of that list and they will be treated seperately. PROF. SAUGATA ROY (DUM DUM): The Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Revewal Mission was a Mission mode reforming programme which extended from 2005 to 2012 and the total outlay envisaged was rupees one lakh crore. The Mission, as has been mentioned by Shri Revneet Singh ji, was given a two year extension till March 2014. Till now very significant work was done in Indore where the Janmarg or the BRTS was made, in Ahmedabad, the Janmarg or the BRTS was made with the money from JNNURM. Now, there is a peculiar situation because many of the scheme under JNNURM have remained incomplete. The Centre has totally stopped funding these schemes. HON. SPEAKER: Please put your question. PROF. SAUGATA ROY (DUM DUM): Madam, my question is this. For nine months we have been hoping that a new Mission, may be not in Jawaharlal Nehru's name, may be in Deen Dayal Upadhyaya's name, would be launched for the development of the cities. May I ask the hon. Minister, what is the exact plan for an alternative Mission to follow up the Jawaharlal Nehru Urban Renewal Mission which had done quite significant work in the 65 Mission cities throughout the country? SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU: I am not undernining the good work done but there were certain lessons which we have learnt from that previous mission. That mission has come to an end by itself because of the decisions taken by the previous Government. What Prof. Saugata Roy is saying is a fact. There is a gap now because certain projects have reached upto a level of, say, 50 per cent or 60 per cent or 70 per cent and then they are starving because of funds. But, as I told, we have faced with a situation where the decisions was taken earlier that they will be completed with the support of the State funds only. Earlier, the difficulty was that there were no available equivalent funds with the State Governments because they also have paucity of funds. Subsequently, because of the recent decision of the Government, on the basis of the recommendations of the Finance Commission, the States have got some amount of money and the local urban bodies have also got some amount of money. Whether they will be sufficient and whether part of it has to be taken under the new mission is a point which is under the active consideration of the Central Government. I do agree that we have to find a solution to this at the earliest 116 because if the resources which are spent upto 60 per cent or 70 per cent remain idle, then it will be a national waste. So, keeping that in mind, we are holding discussions with the States and shortly, we will come to some conclusion and then move forward. APPENDIX XVIII GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT LOK SABHA STARRED QUESTION NO. 121 ANSWERED ON 04.03.2015 Utilisation of Funds for Urban Development 121. SHRI RAMEN DEKA: SHRI RAVNEET SINGH: Will the Minister of URBAN DEVELOPMENT be pleased to state: (a) the funds allocated and utilized for the urban development schemes during the last three years and the current year, year-wise and scheme-wise; (b) whether large sum of allocations made to States for urban development remained unspent and if so, the details thereof along with the reasons therefor, State and scheme/project-wise; (c) whether any mechanism has been put in place to monitor the utilization of funds allocated to States and if so, the details thereof along with the steps taken/ proposed to be taken to strengthen the mechanism; and (d) the steps taken to make urban local bodies more efficient and empowered to pitch for funds and its utilization? ANSWER THE MINISTER OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT (SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU): (a) to (d) A statement is laid on the Table of the house. STATEMENT STATEMENT REFERRED TO IN REPLY TO THE LOK SABHA STARRED QUESTION NO. 121 FOR 04.03.2015 REGARDING "UTILIZATION OF FUNDS FOR URBAN DEVELOPMENT". (a) and (b) The details of funds allocated and utilized for the following Urban Development Schemes during the last three years & current year, is given in Annexure I:— (i) Under Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JNNURM); (ii) Urban Infrastructure Development in Satellite towns around seven Mega Cities (UIDSST) scheme, 10% Lump sum scheme and NERUDP Scheme; (iii) Swachh Bharat Mission; (iv) Metro Rail Projects.

117 118

The National Heritage City Development and Augmentation Yojana (HRIDAY), was officially launched on 21st January, 2015. An outlay of Rs. 200 crore has been earmarked under HRIDAY for the current financial year out of which Rs. 87 lakh has been released till 28.02.2015.

During the period 2011-12 to 2013-14, under the aforesaid Schemes projects are funded as per the respective scheme guidelines in the form of Additional Central Assistant (ACA) and remaining funds are arranged by the States and Urban Local Bodies (ULBs)/Parastatals. Subsequent installment of ACA is released for projects subject to utilization of grants and other conditionalities like achievement of reforms according to the timelines agreed to by the States and ULBs for JNNURM. Hence, question of large amount being unspent does not arise. The reasons for delay in projects during this period are mainly due to capacity constraints of implementing agencies issues related to land acquisition, problems of contract management at ULB level.

During the current financial year, for the new schemes on 100 Smart Cities & New Urban Development Mission, extensive consultations with State Governments and various stakeholders were done. The Schemes are in final stages of design and will be launched soon.

(c) Under each different scheme, guidelines have put in place a number of mechanisms to monitor the utilization of funds to States such as:— (i) Regular review and Monitoring at the level of Ministry and State Government by various Committees constituted under the specific scheme. (ii) Third party review and monitoring. (iii) Quarterly progress reports submitted by implementing agencies. (iv) Utilization certificates and reports by competent authorities at State level.

(d) Regular capacity building programme of the Ministry are aimed towards making ULB's efficient and empowered. JNNURM was a reform linked programme undertaken by the Government of India. Most of the reforms were aimed to make ULB's more efficient and to empower them for better fund utilization. There were 23 reforms identified for implementation, both at State and ULB level, the details of reforms and achievement are at Annexures II & III. 119 105** Expdn. (Rs. in Crore) 0.00 0.00 0.00 ANNEXURE I ture upto Expendi- % 20.02.2015 0 Smart Cities. tion 200.00 Alloca- 1690.5* Expdn. 0.00 ture Expendi- % 0.00 0.00 tion Alloca- Expdn. ture Expendi- % 3754.99 - 7191.14 5438.74 - 1020.36 1072.43 tion 5280 Alloca- Expdn. ture Expendi- % 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 tion Allocation and Expenditure for the last 4 years Urban Development Schemes (RE) (RE) (RE) (RE) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Alloca- 58.20 42.6270.00 73.23 69.58 30.00 99.40 29.95 30.00 99.83 24.02 50.00 80.07 48.78 70.00 97.56 69.03 244.30 98.61 131.21 82.00 53.71 82.20 100.24 164.00 164.00 100.00 145.55 109.98 75.56 150.00 124.81 83.21 150.00 137.85 91.90 5267.27 5255.95 99.79 5054.63 4865.80 96.26 5759.91 5528.26 95.98 6167.78 5577.53 90.43 5575.08 5454.52 - Y (Heritage Y Mission Development) Provision for North Eastern States Region Urban Development Programme (Satellite towns) Scheme **The expenditure is marginally higher with reference to RE but within BE, Provision for 2014-15 includes New Mission 10 *Provision is provided in 1st Batch of supplementary Demands for Grants 2014-15 and re-appropriations is process. 7. Swachh Bharat 4. UIDSST 5. Metro Rail 6. HRIDA 2. 10% Lumpsum 3. North Eastern 1. JNNURM ANNEXURE II

Sl. No. State Level Reforms 1. Implementation of 74th CAA 2. Integration of City Planning & Delivery Functions 3. Reform in Rent Control 4. Stamp duty rationalization to 5% 5. Repeal of ULCRA 6. Enactment of Community Participation Law 7. Enactment of Public Disclosure Law ULB Level Reforms 1. e-Governance 2. Shift to Accrual based Double Entry Accounting 3. Property Tax (85% Coverage & 90% Collection Efficiency) 4. 100% cost recovery (Water Supply & SWM) 5. Internal Earmarking of Funds for Services to Urban Poor 6. Provision of Basic Services to Urban Poor Optional Reforms 1. Revision of Building Bye laws—To make rain water harvesting mandatory 2. Revision of Building Bye laws—streamlining the Approval Process 3. Byelaws on Reuse of Recycled Water 4. Simplification of Legal and Procedural framework for conversion of agricultural land for non-agricultural purposes 5. Introduction of computerized process of Registration of land and Property 6. Encouraging PPP 7. Earmarking 25% developed land in all housing projects for EWS/LIG 8. Administrative Reforms 9. Structural Reforms 10. Introduction of Property Title Certification System in municipalities

120 ANNEXURE III Reform achievement status as on March 2014 Sl. No. State ULB Level State Level Optional Level Overall Score 1. Andhra Pradesh 95 96 90 93.3 2. Arunachal Pradesh 34 86 82 70.3 3. Assam 62 93 86 81.6 4. Bihar 69 73 73 72 5. Chandigarh 72 95 91 87.3 6. Chhattisgarh 89 94 88 89.9 7. Delhi 84 93 83 86.3 8. Goa 67 84 93 83.3 9. Gujarat 92 91 96 93.5 10. Haryana 77 71 74 74 11. Himachal Pradesh 77 100 95 91.7 12. Jammu & Kashmir 76 93 95 89.3 13. Jharkhand 56 86 63 68.5 14. Karnataka 97 97 95 96.1 15. Kerala 99 93 90 93.3 16. Madhya Pradesh 88 86 85 85.9 17. Maharashtra 99 100 100 99.8 18. Manipur 22 59 60 49.8 19. Meghalaya 79 76 58 68.6 20. Mizoram 51 89 80 75.2 21. Nagaland 7 79 43 44.3 22. Odisha 75 79 79 77.8 23. Puducherry 63 93 88 82.8 24. Punjab 82 93 90 88.8 25. Rajasthan 78 93 87 86.5 26. Sikkim 44 69 58 57.6 27. Tamil Nadu 99.5 99 100 99.6 28. Telangana 99 96 90 94.3 29. Tripura 73 88 64 73.5 30. Uttar Pradesh 85 90 88 88 31. Uttarakhand 70 86 79 78.7 32. West Bengal 82 77 100 88.3 Overall Score 80 87 80 84 121 122

(Q. 121) SHRI RAMEN DEKA (MANGALDAI): Thank you, Madam. This is my first chance to ask a Question as I always miss my chance due to adjournment. The reply of the hon. Minister is elaborate but I still want to ask a question to the hon. Minister through you. I would like to know whether the Government has any proposal to inquire into the utilization of fund under JNNURM in Guwahati and other Municipal Boards in Assam as there are allegations of mis-utilisation of this fund. Jh ,eñ oSadS¸;k uk;Mw% v/;{k th] ,d LisflfQd loky ekuuh; lnL; us iwNk gS] vHkh esjs ikl ,slh fdlh f'kdk;r dh tkudkjh ugha gS] exj vle ls ts,u,u;wvkj,e ds lanHkZ esa dksbZ f'kdk;r vk,xh rks eSa mls ns[kwaxk vkSj vxj f'kdk;r xaHkhj gqbZ rks t:j mlds Åij buDok;jh djk ysaxsA

SHRI RAMAN DEKA (MANGALDAI): Rain is a major problem in Assam. Due to rain there are fresh floods in all the urban areas, especially in my constituency Mangaldai, Nalbari, Guwahati. I would like to know whether the Government has any plan to overcome fresh floods due to rain in urban areas of Assam. SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU: Madam. Speaker, it is a general question. It is a fact that because of Brahmaputra and because of heavy rains frequent floods are affecting the State of Assam, more particularly Guwahati city.That being the case, if the State Government has some definite proposal, we will consider whether it fits within our scheme or has to be tackled by the Water Resource Ministry because water resource subject is allotted to that particular Ministry. The hon. Member should first take up the issue with the State Government and then if there is some specific proposal the concerned Ministry will get it examined. Whatever support the Ministry of Urban Development can extend we will extend it. Jh jouhr flag ¼yqf/k;kuk½% v/;{k egksn;k] tokgjyky usg: us'kuy vcZu fjU;wvy fe'ku ;wih,&1 ljdkj us fnlacj] 2005 esa lkr o"kks± ds fy, 'kq: fd;k FkkA ckn esa mls nks lky ds fy, vkSj c<+k;k x;k] ekpZ] 2014 rd c<+k;k x;kA blds v/khu izkstsDV~l esa okVj lIykbZ] lSfuVs'ku] lhojst] lkWfyM osLV eSustesaV] jksM usVodZ] vcZu VªkaliksVZ vkfn vge izkstsDV~l 'kgjksa ds fy, FksA vcZu baQzkLVªDpj MsoyiesaV Ldhe esa NksVs VkmUl ds fy, 6607 djksM+ #i;s ls vf/kd /ku ljdkj us rhu o"kks± esa fn;kA blds v/khu fofHkUu jkT;ksa ,oa fefuLVªht us 3384 djksM+ #i;s [kpZ fd,A baQzkLVªDpj ,aM xous±l ij] ;wñvkbZñthñ Ldhe esa 3]442 djksM+ #i, 2011 ls 2014 rd fn, x,A mlesa ls 923 djksM+ #i, [kpZ fd, x,A ;fn ,sls gh eSa lkjs ns'k dh fLFkfr dh ckr d:a] [kkldj eSa vius lalnh; {ks= yqf/k;kuk dh ckr d:a rks cgqr cM+h jde ljdkj us 'kgjksa ds fy, nh FkhA ysfdu vkt dbZ izkstsDV~l pkgs lhojst dk gks] jksM dk gks ;k ;krk;kr ;kfu clksa dk gks] os lkjs izkstsDV~l dgha u dgha v/kwjs iM+s gSaA blls cgqr cM+k [krjk cu x;k gS] D;ksafd dHkh bl ckjs esa dksbZ Li"Vhdj.k ugha vk;kA fyf[kr tokc esa Hkh crk;k x;k gS fd jkT;ksa ds lkFk ppkZ gks jgh gSaA eSa iwNuk pkgrk gwa fd vc dkSu lh Ldhe ljdkj cukus tk jgh gS\ eSa dguk pkgrk gwa fd bl 123 ;kstuk ds rgr dbZ gtkj djksM+ #i;ksa dh LdhEl 'kq: dh xbZ Fkha] os dgha chp esa u jg tk,aA blfy, eSa ljdkj ls tkuuk pkgrk gwa fd os LdhEl dc iwjh gksaxh\ ekuuh; v/;{k% LdhEl ds dEIyh'kal ds fy, tkuuk pkgrs gSaA Jh jouhr flag ¼yqf/k;kuk½% eSa ;g Hkh tkuuk pkgrk gwa fd tks LdhEl iwjh gks pqdh gSa] muds j[kj[kko ds fy, D;k ljdkj dksbZ iSlk nsxh\ var esa eSa ,d ckr vkSj iwNuk pkgrk gwaA ekuuh; v/;{k% vkidk ,d iwjd iz'u gks x;k gSA Jh jouhr flag ¼yqf/k;kuk½% gekjs :jy ,fj;kt+ esa foftysal ekWfuVfjax desVht gSaA mlesa lkaln vkSj fo/kk;d lnL; gSaA gekjh gkml desVh us Hkh QSlyk fd;k gS vkSj dgk gS fd D;ksa ugha 'kgjksa ds fy, Hkh foftysal ekWfuVfjax desVh cukbZ tkrh] tks ,d&,d ikbZ dk fglkc j[k ldsA eSa le>rk gwa fd bl ckr ls lkjk lnu Hkh lger gksxkA ;gka ij iz/kku ea=h th Hkh ekStwn gSaA eSa ea=h th ls iwNuk pkgrk gwa fd vcZu ,fj;k ds fy, Hkh D;k foftysal ekWfuVfjax desVh cukus ij vki fopkj djsaxs\ Jh ,eñ osadS¸;k uk;Mw% v/;{k] th] tSlk fd ekuuh; lnL; us dgk] eSa crkuk pkgrk gwa fd ;g izksxzke 2005 esa 'kq: fd;k x;k FkkA lu~ 2012 esa ;g ;kstuk lekIr gks xbZ FkhA mlds ckn bls ,d lky ds fy, vkSj ,DlVsaM fd;k x;kA fQj mlds ckn pquko ds nkSjku bls ,d lky dk vkSj ,DlVsa'ku fn;k x;k gSA mlesa ;g 'krZ j[kh xbZ fd tks LdhEl eatwj dh xbZ gSa] muds fy, iSlk fjyht fd;k tk,xkA mu LdhEl dks 31 ekpZ] 2014 rd iwjk gksuk pkfg, vkSj ;fn os mDr vof/k rd iwjh ugha gksrha rks mudh vkxs dh ns[kHkky izns'k ljdkj dks djuh pkfg,A ;g fu.kZ; ml le; dh ljdkj us rc fy;k Fkk vkSj ;g rF; gSA I am not trying to escape from the responsibility of the present Government but that was the decision taken at that time. The schemes sanctioned during that period have to be completed by 31st March, 2014. That is the factual position. With regard to incomplete works, as the hon. Member has rightly said, there are incomplete works in a number of States and the States are supposed to take care of them. But the States are not in a position to take care of them. That is what the States are saying. They have been coming and meeting me. They have also been writing letters to me. But with the recent increase of funds to the State Governments by the Finance Commission and also with the additional resources made available by the Finance Commission to urban local bodies, this has to be taken care of by the States. In addition to this, what the Centre can do, we are examining it. In between came the recommendation of the Finance Commission and much of the money have gone to States. To be frank, my counterparts in the States have become rich and comparatively I have become poor. I have no problem because it is a policy and my Prime Minister is very keen to see that the States have to be strengthened. Lastly, what the hon. Member has said is very important. As the Minister of Rural Development, I insisted that there has to be a monitoring and review committee chaired by the Member of Parliament of that particular area. He has given a suggestion 124 for doing it in the urban areas also. At present, only the officers are monitoring them and then I have to answer it is Parliament. Therefore, I shall positively consider this suggestion of making the MPs also as the co-Chairmen because there has to be an official also for the monitoring committee of the cities which fall in their constituency. SHRI P.R. SUNDARAM (NAMAKKAL): Hon. Speaker, Madam, Tamil Nadu has obtained first place in achievement status with regard to utilization of funds for urban development. Guided by our Puratchi Thalaivi Amma, optimal level achievement of Tamil Nadu is 100 per cent. In the State level performance, Tamil Nadu stands first with 99 per cent. Hon. Minister's reply refers to this. I want to know whether such well-performing States like Tamil Nadu will be rewarded by way of providing more number of 'Smart Cities'. SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU: Madam Speaker, I have no hesitation in accepting the fact that Tamil Nadu is one of the better performing States as far as Urban Development is concerned. I had an occasion to review the performance during my visit to Chennai where I had an occasion to meet the then Chief Minister Ms. Jayalalitha. I have publicly accepted it also. It is because there should be an example to other States also. There are some other States also which have done well. Madam, with regard to the sanction of smart cities, naturally the performing States has to be encouraged. We will keep this in mind. The problem is that the smart cities are not going to be allocated. The smart city concept is at the stage of finalization and there will be a city challenging system where the cities, whether they will be eligible or not, will be decided depending on their performance, depending on their credit worthiness and depending on their willingness to get reformed. All these factors are there. When it comes to selecting cities from the State of Tamil Nadu, definitely the point of view of the State will be kept in mind. SHRI B. VINOD KUMAR (KARIMNAGAR): Madam Speaker, the hon. Minister has replied in detail. I would like to ask the hon. Minister whether the scheme, the Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission, will continue which was launched by the earlier Government. I would like to know whether this Government will continue this project or not. If the Government proposes to continue with the scheme, I would like to know from the Minister whether the Government is proposing to relax the criteria. Earlier, the cities with 10 lakh population were considered under the scheme. 63 cities were considered. If the Government is proposing to continue with the scheme, I would like to know whether they propose to relax the conditions so that may other cities can also come under the purview of this scheme. I would also like to know from the hon. Minister whether the cities which were already under this Mission would once again be considered under smart cities, or the cities which were considered under Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission will be deleted in order to see that more new cities could come under the purview of the smart cities. SHRI M.VENKAIAH NAIDU: Madam, as I mentioned, the scheme was initiated in 2005 and was supposed to be completed by 2012. The then Government had given two extensions, one up to 2013 and another up to 2014 and then it was said that it will come to an end. This was earlier envisaged by the Planning 125

Commission. The present Government is considering launching a new Mission for Urban Rejuvenation which has been mentioned in the Budget also. In that scheme, as has been rightly mentioned by the hon. Member, the criteria for major cities is not 10 lakhs and above. The Government now is considering to include cities which are one lakh and above. That means the number will go to 500. With further clarification with regard to the smart cities, some of the cities could become eligible for consideration as smart cities. It is because a smart city is going to be on PPP model. It is not a Government funded scheme. Government will definitely participate but it will be on PPP Model. When cities become eligible, they will be taken out of that list and they will be treated separately. PROF. SAUGATA ROY (DUM DUM): The Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission was a Mission mode reforming programme which extended from 2005 to 2012 and the total outlay envisaged was rupees one lakh crore. The Mission, as has been mentioned by Shri Ravneet Singh ji, was given a two year extension till March 2014. Till now very significant work was done in Indore where the Janmarg or the BRTS was made; in Ahmedabad, the Janmarg or the BRTS was made with the money from the JNNURM. Now, there is a peculiar situation because many of the schemes under JNNURM have remained incomplete. The Centre has totally stopped funding these schemes. HON. SPEAKER: Please put your question. PROF. SAUGATA ROY (DUM DUM): Madam, my question is this. For nine months we have been hoping that new Mission, may be not in Jawaharlal Nehru's name, may be in Deen Dayal Upadhyaya's name, would be launched for the development of the cities. May I ask the hon. Minister, what is the exact plan for an alternative Mission to follow up the Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission which had done quite significant work in the 65 Mission cities throughout the country? SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU: I am not undermining the good work done but there were certain lessons which we have learnt from that previous mission. That mission has come to an end by itself because of the decision taken by the previous Government. What Prof. Saugata Roy is saying is a fact. There is a gap now because certain projects have reached upto a level of, say 50 per cent or 60 per cent or 70 per cent and then they are starving because of funds. But, as I told, we have faced with a situation where the decision was taken earlier that they will be completed with the support of the State funds only. Earlier, the difficulty was that there were no available equivalent funds with the State Governments because they also have paucity of funds. Subsequently, because of the recent decision of the Government, on the basis of the recommendations of the Finance Commission, the States have got some amount of money and the local urban bodies have also got some amount of money. Whether they will be sufficient and whether part of it has to be taken under the new mission is a point which is under the active consideration of the Central Government. I do agree that we have to find a solution to this at the earliest because if the resources which are spent upto 60 per cent or 70 per cent remain idle, then it will be a national waste. So, keeping that in mind, we are holding discussions with the States and shortly, we will come to some conclusion and then move forward. APPENDIX XIX GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT LOK SABHA STARRED QUESTION NO. 121 ANSWERED ON 04 MARCH, 2015 Utilisation of Funds for Urban Development 121. SHRI RAMEN DEKA: SHRI RAVNEET SINGH: Will the Minister of URBAN DEVELOPMENT be pleased to state: (a) the funds allocated and utilized for the urban development schemes during the last three years and the current year, year-wise and scheme-wise; (b) whether large sum of allocations made to States for urban development remained unspent and if so, the details thereof along with the reasons therefor, State and scheme/project-wise; (c) whether any mechanism has been put in place to monitor the utilization of funds allocated to States and if so, the details thereof along with the steps taken/ proposed to be taken to strengthen the mechanism; and (d) the steps taken to make urban local bodies more efficient and empowered to pitch for funds and its utilization? ANSWER THE MINISTER OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT (SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU): (a) to (d) A statement is laid on the Table of the House. STATEMENT STATEMENT REFERRED TO IN REPLY TO THE LOK SABHA STARRED QUESTION NO. 121 FOR 04.03.2015 REGARDING "UTILISATION OF FUNDS FOR URBAN DEVELOPMENT." (a) and (b) The details of funds allocated and utilized for the following Urban Development Schemes during the last three years & the current year, is given in Annexure-I:— (i) Under Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JNNURM); (ii) Urban Infrastructure Development in Satellite towns around seven Mega Cities (UIDSST) scheme, 10% Lump sum scheme and NERUDP Scheme; (iii) Swachh Bharat Mission; (iv) Metro Rail projects. 126 127

The National Heritage City Development and Augmentation Yojana (HRIDAY), was offically launched on 21st January, 2015. An outlay of Rs. 200 crore has been earmarked under HRIDAY for the current financial year out of which Rs. 87 lakh has been released till 28.02.2015. During the period 2011-12 to 2013-14, under the aforesaid Schemes, projects are funded as per the respective scheme guidelines in the form of Additional Central Assistance (ACA) and remaining funds are arranged by the States and Urban Local Bodies (ULBs)/Parastatals. Subsequent installment of ACA is released for projects subject to utilization of grants and other conditionalities like achievement of reforms according to the timelines agreed to by the States and ULBs for JNNURM. Hence, question of large amount being unspent does not arise. The reasons for delay in projects during this period are mainly due to capacity constraints of implementing agencies, issues related to land acquisition, problems of contract management at ULB level. During the current financial year, for the new schemes on 100 Smart Cities & New Urban Development Mission, extensive consultations with State Governments and various stakeholders were done. The Schemes are in final stages of design and will be launched soon. (c) Under each different scheme, guidelines have put in place a number of mechanisms to monitor the utilization of funds to States such as:— (i) Regular review and Monitoring at the level of Ministry and State Government by various committees constituted under the specific scheme. (ii) Third party review and monitoring. (iii) Quarterly progress reports submitted by implementing agencies. (iv) Utilization certificates and reports by competent authorities at State level. (d) Regular capacity building programme of the Ministry are aimed towards making ULB's efficient and empowered. JNNURM was a reform linked programme undertaken by the Government of India. Most of the reforms were aimed to make ULB's more efficient and to empower them for better fund utilization. There are 23 reforms identified for implementation, both at State and ULB levels, the details of reforms and achievement are at Annexures-II & III. 128 105** Expdn. (Rs. in crore) 0.000.00 0.00 ANNEXURE I ture upto Expendi- % 20.02.2015 mart Cities. tion 200.00 Alloca- 1690.5* Expdn. 0.00 ture Expendi- % 0.00 tion Alloca- Expdn. ture Expendi- % 3754.90 - 7191.14 5438.74 - 1020.36 1072.43 tion 5280 Alloca- Expdn. ndi- % ture 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 tion Allocation and Expenditure for the last 4 years Urban Development Schemes (RE) (RE) (RE) (RE) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Alloca- Expe 58.20 42.6270.00 73.23 69.58 30.00 99.40 29.95 30.00 99.83 24.02 50.00 80.07 48.78 70.00 97.56 69.03 244.30 98.61 131.21 82.00 53.71 82.20 100.24 164.00 164.00 100.00 145.55 109.98 75.56 150.00 124.81 83.21 150.00 137.85 91.90 5267.27 5255.95 99.79 5054.63 4865.80 96.26 5759.91 5528.26 95.98 6167.78 5577.53 90.43 5575.08 5454.52 - Y (Heritage Y Mission Development) Provision for North Eastern States Region Urban Development Programme (Satellite towns) Scheme *Provision is provided in 1st Batch of supplementary Demands for Grants 2014-15 and re-appropriation process. **The expenditure is marginally higher with reference to RE but within BE, Provision for 2014-15 includes New Mission 100 S 7. Swachh Bharat 4. UIDSST 5. Metro Rail 6. HRIDA 2. 10% Lumpsum 3. North Eastern 1. JNNURM ANNEXURE-II

Sl. No. State Level Reforms 1. Implementation of 74th CAA 2. Integration of City Planning & Delivery Functions 3. Reforms in Rent Control 4. Stamp duty rationalization to 5% 5. Repeal of ULCRA 6. Enactment of Community Participation Law 7. Enactment of Public Disclosure Law ULB Level Reforms 1. e-Governance 2. Shift to Accrual based Double Entry Accounting 3. Property Tax (85% Coverage & 90% Collection Efficiency) 4. 100% cost recovery (Water Supply & SWM) 5. Internal Earmarking of Funds for Services to Urban Poor 6. Provision of Basic Services to Urban Poor Optional Reforms 1. Revision of Building Bye-laws—To make rain water harvesting mandatory 2. Revision of Building Bye-laws—streamlining the Approval Process 3. Bye-laws on Reuse of Recycled Water 4. Simplification of Legal and Procedural framework for conversion of agricultural land for non-agricultural purposes 5. Introduction of computerised process of Registration of Land and Property 6. Encouraging PPP 7. Earmarking 25% developed land in all housing projects for EWS/LIG 8. Administrative Reforms 9. Structural Reforms 10. Introduction of Property Title Certification System in municipalities

129 ANNEXURE-III Reform achievement status as on March, 2014

Sl. State ULB State Optional Overall No. Level Level Level Score 1. Andhra Pradesh 95 96 90 93.3 2. Arunachal Pradesh 34 86 82 70.3 3. Assam 62 93 86 81.6 4. Bihar 69 73 73 72 5. Chandigarh 72 95 91 87.3 6. Chhattisgarh 89 94 88 89.9 7. Delhi 84 93 83 86.3 8. Goa 67 84 93 83.3 9. Gujarat 92 91 96 93.5 10. Haryana 77 71 74 74 11. Himachal Pradesh 77 100 95 91.7 12. Jammu & Kashmir 76 93 95 89.3 13. Jharkhand 56 86 63 68.5 14. Karnataka 97 97 95 96.1 15. Kerala 99 93 90 93.3 16. Madhya Pradesh 88 86 85 85.9 17. Maharashtra 99 100 100 99.8 18. Manipur 22 59 60 49.8 19. Meghalaya 79 76 58 68.6 20. Mizoram 51 89 80 75.2 21. Nagaland 7 79 43 44.3 22. Odisha 75 79 79 77.8 23. Puducherry 63 93 88 82.8 24. Punjab 82 93 90 88.8 25. Rajasthan 78 93 87 86.5 26. Sikkim 44 69 58 57.6 27. Tamil Nadu 99.5 99 100 99.6 28. Telangana 99 96 90 94.3 29. Tripura 73 88 64 73.5 30. Uttar Pradesh 85 90 88 88 31. Uttarakhand 70 86 79 78.7 32. West Bengal 82 77 100 88.3 Overall Score 80 87 80 84

130 131

(Q. 121) SHRI RAMEN DEKA (MANGALDAI): Thank you, Madam.This is my first chance to ask a Question as I always miss my chance due to adjournment. The reply of the hon. Minister is elaborate but I still want to ask a question to hon. Minister through you. I would like to know whether the Government has any proposal to inquire into the utilization of fund under JNNURM in Guwahati and other Municipal Boards in Assam as there are allegations of mis-utilisation of this fund. Jh ,eñ oSadS¸;k uk;Mw% v/;{k th] ,d LisflfQd loky ekuuh; lnL; us iwNk gS] vHkh esjs ikl ,slh fdlh f'kdk;r dh tkudkjh ugha gS] exj vle ls ts,u,u;wvkj,e ds lanHkZ esa dksbZ f'kdk;r vk,xh rks eSa mls ns[kwaxk vkSj vxj f'kdk;r xaHkhj gqbZ rks t:j mlds Åij buDok;jh djk ysaxsA SHRI RAMEN DEKA (MANGALDAI): Rain is a major problem in Assam. Due to rain there are fresh floods in all the urban areas, especially in my constituency Mangaldai, Nalbari, Guwahati. I would like to know whether the Government has any plan to overcome fresh floods due to rain in urban areas of Assam. SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU: Madam, Speaker, it is a general question. It is a fact that because of Brahmaputra and because of heavy rains frequent floods are affecting the State of Assam, more particularly Guwahati city. That being the case, if the State Government has some definite proposal, we will consider whether it fits with in our scheme or has to be tackled by the Water Resource Ministry because water resource subject is allotted to that particular Ministry. The hon. Member should first take up the issue with the State Government and then if there is some specific proposal the concerned Ministry will get it examined. Whatever support the Ministry of Urban Development can extend, we will extend it. Jh jouhr flag ¼yqf/k;kuk½% v/;{k egksn;k] tokgjyky usg: us'kuy vcZu fjU;wvy fe'ku ;wih,&1 ljdkj us fnlEcj] 2005 e salkr o"kksZa ds fy, 'kq: fd;k FkkA ckn esa mls nks lky ds fy, vkSj c<+k;k x;k] ekpZ] 2014 rd c<+k;k x;kA blds v/khu izkstsDV~l esa okVj lIykbZ] lSfuVs'ku] lhojst] lkWfyM osLV eSustesaV] jksM usVodZ] vcZu VªkaliksVZ vkfn vge izkstsDV~l 'kgjksa ds fy, FksA vcZu baQzkLVªDpj MsoyiesaV Ldhe esa NksVs VkmUl ds fy, 6607 djksM+ #i;s ls vf/kd /ku ljdkj us rhu o"kks± esa fn,A blds v/khu fofHkUUk jkT;ksa ,oa fefuLVªht us 3384 djksM+ #i;s [kpZ fd,A baQzkLVªDpj ,aM xous±l ij] ;wñvkbZñthñ Ldhe esa 3]442 djksM+ #i, 2011 ls 2014 rd fn, x,A mlesa ls 923 djksM+ #i, [kpZ fd, x,A ;fn ,sls gh eSa lkjs ns'k dh fLFkfr dh ckr d:a] [kkldj eSa vius lalnh; {ks= yqf/k;kuk dh ckr d:a rks cgqr cM+h jde ljdkj us 'kgjksa ds fy, nh FkhA ysfdu vkt dbZ izkstsDV~l pkgs lhojst dk gks] jksM dk gks ;k ;krk;kr ;kfu clksa dk gks] os lkjs izkstsDV~l dgha u dgha v/kwjs iM+s gSaA blls cgqr cM+k [krjk cu x;k gS] D;ksafd dHkh bl ckjs esa dksbZ Li"Vhdj.k ugha vk;kA fyf[kr tokc esa Hkh crk;k x;k gS fd jkT;ksa ds lkFk ppkZ gks jgh gSA eSa iwNuk pkgrk gwa vkils dkSu lh Ldhe ljdkj cukus tk jgh gS\ eSa dguk pkgrk gwa fd bl ;kstuk ds rgr dbZ gtkj djksM+ #i;ksa dh LdhEl 'kq: dh xbZ Fkh] os dgha chp esa u jg tk,aA blfy, eSa ljdkj ls tkuuk pkgrk gwaa fd os LdhEl dc iwjh gksaxh\ 132 ekuuh; v/;{k% LdhEl ds dEIyh'kal ds fy, tkuuk pkgrs gSaA Jh jouhr flag ¼yqf/k;kuk½% eSa ;g Hkh tkuuk pkgrk gwa fd tks LdhEl iwjh gks pqdh gSa] muds j[k&j[kko ds fy, D;k ljdkj dksbZ iSlk nsxh\ var esa eSa ,d ckr vkSj iwNuk pkgrk gwaA ekuuh; v/;{k% vkidk ,d iwjd iz'u gks x;k gSA Jh jouhr flag ¼yqf/k;kuk½% gekjs :jy ,fj;kt esa foftysal ekfuVfjax desVht gSaA mlesa lkaln vkSj fo/kk;d lnL; gSaA gekjh gkml desVh us Hkh QSlyk fd;k gS vkSj dgk gS fd D;ksa ugha 'kgjksa ds fy, Hkh foftysal ekfuVfjax desaVh cukbZ tkrha] tks ,d&,d ikbZ dk fglkc j[k ldsaA eSa le>rk gwa fd bl ckr ls lkjk lnu Hkh lger gksxkA ;gka ij iz/kku ea=h th Hkh ekStwn gSaA eSa ea=h th ls iwNuk pkgrk gwa fd vcZu ,fj;k ds fy, Hkh D;k foftysal ekfuVfjax desVh cukus ij vki fopkj djsaxs\ Jh ,eñ oSadS¸;k uk;Mw% v/;{k th] tSlk fd ekuuh; lnL; us dgk] eSa crkuk pkgrk gwa fd ;g izksxzke 2005 esa 'kq: fd;k x;k FkkA lu~ 2012 esa ;g ;kstuk lekIr gks xbZ FkhA mlds ckn bls ,d lky ds fy, vkSj ,DlVsaM fd;k x;kA fQj mlds ckn pquko ds nkSjku bls ,d lky dk vkSj ,DlVsa'ku fn;k x;kA mlesa ;g 'krZ j[kh xbZ fd tks LdhEl eatwj dh xbZ gSa] muds fy, iSlk fjyht fd;k tk,xkA mu LdhEl dks 31 ekpZ] 2014 rd iwjk gksuk pkfg, vkSj ;fn os mDr vof/k rd iwjh ugha gksrh rks mudh vkxs dh ns[kHkky izns'k ljdkj dks djuh pkfg,A ;g fu.kZ; ml le; dh ljdkj us rc fy;k Fkk vkSj ;g rF; gSA I am not trying to escape from the responsibility of the present Government but that was the decision taken at that time. The schemes sanctioned during that period have to be completed by 31st March, 2014. That is the factual position. With regard to incomplete works, as the hon. Member has rightly said, there is incomplete works in a number of States and the States are supposed to take care of them. But the States are not in a position to take care of them. That is what the States are saying. They have been coming and meeting me. They have also been writing letters to me. But with the recent increase of funds to the State Governments by the Finance Commission and also with the additional resources made available by the Finance Commission to urban local bodies, this has to be taken care of by the States. In addition to this, what the Centre can do, we are examining it. In between came the recommendation of the Finance Commission and much of the money have gone to States. To be frank, my counterparts in the States have become rich and comparatively I have become poor. I have no problem because it is a policy and my Prime Minister is very keen to see that the States have to be strengthened. Lastly, what the hon. Member has said is very important. As the Minister of Rural Development, I insisted that there has to be a monitoring and review committee chaired by the Memebr of Parliament of that particular area. He has given a suggestion for doing it in the urban areas also. At present, only the officers are monitoring them and then I have to answer it in Parliament. Therefore, I shall positively consider this suggestion of making the MPs also as the co-Chairmen because there has to be an official also for the monitoring committee of the cities which fall in their constituency. 133

SHRI P.R. SUNDARAM (NAMAKKAL): Hon. Speaker, Madam, Tamil Nadu has obtained first place in achievement status with regard to utilization of funds for urban development. Guided by our Puratchi Thalaivi Amma, optimal level achievement of Tamil Nadu is 100 per cent. In the State level performance, Tamil Nadu stands first with 99 per cent. Hon. Minister's reply refers to this. I want to know whether such well-performing States like Tamil Nadu will be rewarded by way of providing more number of ‘Smart Cities’. SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU: Madam Speaker, I have no hesitation in accepting the fact that Tamil Nadu is one of the better performing States as far as Urban Development is concerned. I had an occasion to review the performance during my visit to Chennai where I had an occasion to meet the then Chief Minister Ms. Jayalalitha. I have publicly accepted it also. It is because there should be an example to other States also. There are some other States also which have done well. Madam, with regard to the sanction of smart cities, naturally the performing States has to be encouraged. We will keep this in mind. The problem is that the smart cities are not going to be allocated. The smart city concept is at the stage of finalization and there will be a city challenging system where the cities, whether they will be eligible or not, will be decided depending on their performance, depending on their credit worthiness and depending on their willingness to get reformed. All these factors are there. When it comes to selecting cities from the State of Tamil Nadu, definitely the point of view of the State will be kept in mind. SHRI B. VINOD KUMAR (KARIMNAGAR): Madam Speaker, the hon. Minister has replied in detail. I would like to ask the hon. Minister whether the scheme, the Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission, will continue which was launched by the earlier Government. I would like to know whether this Government will continue this project or not. If the Government proposes to continue with the scheme, I would like to know from the Minister whther the Government is proposing to relax the criteria. Earlier, the cities with 10 lakh population were considered under the scheme. 63 cities were considered. If the Government is proposing to continue with the scheme, I would like to know whether they propose to relax the conditions so that many other cities can also come under the purview of this scheme. I would also like to know from the hon. Minister whether the cities which were already under this Mission would once again to considered under smart cities, or the cities which were considered under Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission will be deleted in order to see that more new cities could come under the purview of the smart cities. SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU: Madam, as I mentioned, the scheme was initiated in 2005 and was supposed to be completed by 2012. The then Government had given two extensions, one up to 2013 and another up to 2014 and then it was said that it will come to an end. This was earlier envisaged by the Planning Commission. The present Government is considering launching a new Mission for Urban Rejuvenation which has been mentioned in the Budget also. In that scheme, 134 as has been rightly mentioned by the hon. Member, the criteria for major cities is not 10 lakhs and above. The Government now is considering to include cities which are one lakh and above. That means the number will go to 500. With further clarification with regard to the smart cities, some of the cities could become eligible for consideration as smart cities. It is because a smart city is going to be on PPP model. It is not a Government funded scheme. Government will definitely participate but it will be on PPP model. When cities become eligible, they will be taken out of that list and they will be treated separately. PROF. SAUGATA ROY (DUM DUM): The Jawaharlal Nehru Naional Urban Renewal Mission as a Mission mode reforming programme which extend from 2005 to 2012 and the total outlay envisaged was rupees one lakh crore. The Mission, as has been mentioned by Shri Ravneet Singh Ji, was given a two year extension till March 2014. Till now very significant work was done in Indore where the Janmarg or the BRTS was made; in Ahmedabad, the Janmarg or the BRTS was made with the money from the JNNURM. Now, there is a peculiar situation because many of the schemes under JNNURM have remained incomplete. The Centre has totally stopped funding to these schemes. HON. SPEAKER: Please put your question. PROF. SAUGATA ROY (DUM DUM): Madam, my question is this. For nine months we have been hoping that a new Mission, may be not in Jawharhlal Nehru's name, may be in Deen Dayal Upadhyay's name, would be launched for the development of the cities. May I ask the hon. Minister, what is the exact plan for an alternative Mission to follow up the Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission which has done quite significant work in the 65 Mission cities throughout the country? SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU: I am not undermining the good work done but there were certain lessons which we have learnt from that previous mission. That mission has come to an end by itself because of the decision taken by the previous Government. What Prof. Saugata Roy is saying is a fact. There is a gap now because certain projects have reached upto a level of, say, 50 per cent or 60 per cent or 70 per cent and then they are starving because of funds. But, as I told, we have faced with a situation where the decision was taken earlier that they will be completed with the support of the State funds only. Earlier, the difficulty was that there were no available equivalent funds with the State Governments because they also have paucity of funds. Subsequently, because of the recent decision of the Government, on the basis of the recommendations of the Finance Commission, the States have got some amount of money and the local urban bodies have also got some amount of money. Whether they will be sufficient and whether part of it has to be taken under the new mission is a point which is under the active consideration of the Central Government. I do agree that we have to find a solution to this at the earliest becase if the resources which are spent upto 60 per cent or 70 per cent remain idle, then it will be a national waste. So, keeping that in mind, we are holding discussion with the States and shortly, we will come to some conclusion and then move forward. 135

APPENDIX XX GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT LOK SABHA STARRED QUESTION NO. 121 TO BE ANSWERED ON 04.03.2015 Utilisation of funds for Urban Development 121. SHRI RAMEN DEKA: SHRI RAVNEET SINGH: Will the Minister of URBAN DEVELOPMENT be pleased to state: (a) the funds allocated and utilized for the urban development schemes during the last three years and the current year, year-wise and scheme-wise; (b) whether large sum of allocations made to States for urban development remained unspent and if so, the details thereof along with the reasons therefor, State and scheme/project-wise; (c) whether any mechanism has been put in place to monitor the utilization of funds allocated to States and if so, the details thereof along with the steps taken/ proposed to be taken to strengthen the mechanism; and (d) the steps taken to make urban local bodies more efficient and empowered to pitch for funds and its utilization? ANSWER THE MINISTER OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT (SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU): (a) to (d) A statement is laid on the Table of the house. STATEMENT STATEMENT REFERRED TO IN REPLY TO THE LOK SABHA STARRED QUESTION NO. 121 FOR 04.03.2015 REGARDING "UTILIZATION OF FUNDS FOR URBAN DEVELOPMENT". (a) & (b) The details of funds allocated and utilized for the following Urban Development Schemes during the last three years & current year, is given in Annexure-I:— (i) Under Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JnNURM); (ii) Urban Infrastructure Development in Satellite towns around seven Mega Cities (UIDSST) scheme, 10% lumpsum scheme and NERUDP Scheme;

135 136

(iii) Swachh Bharat Mission; (iv) Metro Rail projects. The National Heritage City Development and Augmentation Yojana (HRIDAY), was officially launched on 21st January, 2015. An outlay of Rs. 200 crore has been earmarked under HRIDAY for the current financial year out of which Rs. 87 lakh has been released till 28.02.2015. During the period 2011-12 to 2013-14, under the aforesaid Schemes, projects are funded as per the respective scheme guidelines in the form of Additional Central Assistant (ACA) and remaining funds are arranged by the States and Urban Local Bodies (ULBs)/Parastatals. Subsequent installment of ACA is released for projects subject to utilization of grants and other conditionalities like achievement of reforms according to the timelines agreed to by the States and ULBs for JnNURM. Hence, question of large amoung being unspent does not arise. The reasons for delay in projects during this period are mainly due to capacity constraints of implementing agencies, issues related to land acquisition, problems of contract management at ULB level. During the current financial year, for the new schemes on 100 Smart Cities & New Urban Development Mission, extensive consultations with State Governments and various stakeholders were done. The Schemes are in final stages of design and will be launched soon. (c) Under each different scheme, guidelines have put in place a number of mechanisms to monitor the utilization of funds to States such as:— (i) Regular review and Monitoring at the level of Ministry and State Government by various committees constituted under the specific scheme. (ii) Third party review and monitoring. (iii) Quarterly progress reports submitted by implementing agencies. (iv) Utilization certificates and reports by competent authorities at State level. (d) Regular capacity building programme of the Ministry are aimed towards making ULB's efficient and empowered. JnNURM was a reform linked programme undertaken by the Government of India. Most of the reforms were aimed to make ULB's more efficient and to empower them for better fund utilization. There were 23 reforms identified for implementation, both at State and ULB level, the details of reforms and achievement are at Annexure-II & III. MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT

137 Expdn. (Rs. in Crore) upto ANNEXURE I penditure % 20.02.2015 (RE) 0 Smart cities. Allocation Ex Expdn. Expenditure % (RE) 0.00 0.00 200.00 0.00 0.00 Allocation 80.07 70.00 69.03 98.61 82.00 82.20 100.24 Expdn. Expenditure % (RE) Annexure referred to in reply Lok Sabha Starred Question No. 121 for 04/03/2015 Allocation Expdn. 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Expenditure % Allocation and Expenditure for the last 4 years Urban Development Schemes (RE) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1690.5* 0.00 58.20 42.62 73.23 30.00 29.95 99.83 50.00 48.78 97.56 244.30 131.21 53.71 164.00 164.00 100.00 145.55 109.98 75.56 150.00 124.81 83.21 150.00 137.85 91.90 5575.08 5454.52 5280 3754.99 7191.14 5438.74 1020.36 1072.43 105** Allocation Development) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Provision for North Eastern States Region Urban Development Programme (Satellite towns) 70.00 69.58 99.40 30.00 24.02 Scheme Mission **The expenditure is marginally higher with reference to RE but within BE. Provision for 2014-15 includes New Mission 10 *Provision is provided in 1st Batch of supplementary Demands for Grants 2014-15 and re-appropriation process. 5. Metro Rail6. Hriday (Heritage 5267.27 5255.95 99.79 5054.63 4865.80 96.26 5759.91 5528.26 95.98 6167.78 5577.53 90.43 1. JNNURM 7. Swachh Bharat 2. 10% Lumpsum 3. North Eastern 4. UIDSST ANNEXURE II

Sl. No. State Level Reforms 1. Implementation of 74th CAA 2. Integration of City Planning & Delivery Functions 3. Reform in Rent Control 4. Stamp duty rationalization to 5% 5. Repeal of ULCRA 6. Enactment of Community Participation Law 7. Enactment of Public Disclosure Law ULB Level Reforms 1. e-Governance 2. Shift to Accrual based Double Entry Accounting 3. Property Tax (85% Coverage & 90% Collection Efficiency) 4. 100% cost recovery (Water Supply & SWM) 5. Internal Earmarking of Funds for Services to Urban Poor 6. Provision of Basic Services to Urban Poor Optional Reforms 1. Revision of Building Bye laws—To make rain water harvesting mandatory 2. Revision of Building Bye laws—streamlining the Approval Process 3. Bye laws on Reuse of Recycled Water 4. Simplification of Legal and Procedural framework for conversion of agricultural land for non-agricultural purposes 5. Introduction of computerized process of Registration of land and Property 6. Encouraging PPP 7. Earmarking 25% developed land in all housing projects for EWS/LIG 8. Administrative Reforms 9. Structural Reforms 10. Introduction of Property Title Certification System in municipalities

138 ANNEXURE III Reform achievement status as on March, 2014

Sl. State ULB State Optional Overall No. Level Level Level Score 1. Andhra Pradesh 95 96 90 93.3 2. Arunachal Pradesh 34 86 82 70.3 3. Assam 62 93 86 81.6 4. Bihar 69 73 73 72 5. Chandigarh 72 95 91 87.3 6. Chhattisgarh 89 94 88 89.9 7. Delhi 84 93 83 86.3 8. Goa 67 84 93 83.3 9. Gujarat 92 91 96 93.5 10. Haryana 77 71 74 74 11. Himachal Pradesh 77 100 95 91.7 12. Jammu & Kashmir 76 93 95 89.3 13. Jharkhand 56 86 63 68.5 14. Karnataka 97 97 95 96.1 15. Kerala 99 93 90 93.3 16. Madhya Pradesh 88 86 85 85.9 17. Maharashtra 99 100 100 99.8 18. Manipur 22 59 60 49.8 19. Meghalaya 79 76 58 68.6 20. Mizoram 51 89 80 75.2 21. Nagaland 7 79 43 44.3 22. Odisha 75 79 79 77.8 23. Puducherry 63 93 88 82.8 24. Punjab 82 93 90 88.8 25. Rajasthan 78 93 87 86.5 26. Sikkim 44 69 58 57.6 27. Tamil Nadu 99.5 99 100 99.6 28. Telengana 99 96 90 94.3 29. Tripura 73 88 64 73.5 30. Uttar Pradesh 85 90 88 88 31. Uttarakhand 70 86 79 78.7 32. West Bengal 82 77 100 88.3 Overall Score 80 87 86 84

139 140

(Q. 121) SHRI RAMEN DEKA (MANGALDAI): Thank you, Madam. This is my first chance to ask a Question as I always miss my chance due to adjournment. The reply of the hon. Minister is elaborate but I still want to ask a question to the hon. Minister through you. I would like to know whether the Government has any proposal to inquire into the utilization of fund under JNNURM in Guwahati and other Municipal Boards in Assam as there are allegations of mis-utilisation of this fund. Jh ,eñ oSadS¸;k uk;Mw% v/;{k th] ,d LisflfQd loky ekuuh; lnL; us iwNk gS] vHkh esjs ikl ,slh fdlh f'kdk;r dh tkudkjh ugha gS] exj vle ls ts,u,u;wvkj,e ds lanHkZ esa dksbZ f'kdk;r vk,xh rks eSa mls ns[kwaxk vkSj vxj f'kdk;r xaHkhj gqbZ rks t:j mlds Åij buDok;jh djk ysaxsA SHRI RAMAN DEKA (MANGALDAI): Rain is a major problem in Assam. Due to rain there are fresh floods in all the urban areas, especially in my constituency Mangaldai, Nalbari, Guwahati. I would like to know whether the Government has any plan to overcome fresh floods due to rain in urban areas of Assam. SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU: Madam. Speaker, it is a general question. It is a fact that because of Brahmaputra and because of heavy rains frequent floods are affecting the State of Assam, more particularly Guwahati city.That being the case, if the State Government has some definite proposal, we will consider whether it fits within our scheme or has to be tackled by the Water Resource Ministry because water resource subject is allotted to that particular Ministry. The hon. Member should first take up the issue with the State Government and then if there is some specific proposal the concerned Ministry will get it examined. Whatever support the Ministry of Urban Development can extend, we will extend it. Jh jouhr flag ¼yqf/k;kuk½% v/;{k egksn;k] tokgjyky usg: us'kuy vcZu fjU;wvy fe'ku ;wih,&1 ljdkj us fnlacj] 2005 esa lkr o"kks± ds fy, 'kq: fd;k FkkA ckn esa mls nks lky ds fy, vkSj c<+k;k x;k] ekpZ] 2014 rd c<+k;k x;kA blds v/khu izkstsDV~l esa okVj lIykbZ] lSfuVs'ku] lhojst] lkWfyM osLV eSustesaV] jksM usVodZ] vcZu VªkaliksVZ vkfn vge izkstsDV~l 'kgjksa ds fy, FksA vcZu baQz kLVªDpj MsoyiesaV Ldhe esa NksVs VkmUl ds fy, 6607 djksM+ #i;s ls vf/kd /ku ljdkj us rhu o"kks± esa fn,A blds v/khu fofHkUu jkT;ksa ,oa fefuLVªht us 3384 djksM+ #i;s [kpZ fd,A baQzkLVªDpj ,aM xous±l ij] ;wñvkbZñthñ Ldhe esa 3]442 djksM+ #i, 2011 ls 2014 rd fn, x,A mlesa ls 923 djksM+ #i, [kpZ fd, x,A ;fn ,sls gh eSa lkjs ns'k dh fLFkfr dh ckr d#a] [kkldj eSa vius lalnh; {ks= yqf/k;kuk dh ckr d#a rks cgqr cM+h] jde ljdkj us 'kgjksa ds fy, nh FkhA ysfdu vkt dbZ izkstsDV~l pkgs lhojst dk gks] jksM dk gks ;k ;krk;kr ;kfu clksa dk gks] os lkjs izkstsDV~l dgha u dgha v/kwjs iM+s gSaA blls cgqr cM+k [krjk cu x;k gS] D;ksafd dHkh bl ckjs esa dksbZ Li"Vhdj.k ugha vk;kA fyf[kr tcko esa Hkh crk;k x;k gS fd jkT;ksa ds lkFk ppkZ gks jgh gSA eSa iwNuk pkgrk gwa fd vc dkSu lh Ldhe ljdkj cukus tk jgh gS\ eSa dguk pkgrk gwa fd bl ;kstuk ds rgr dbZ gtkj djksM+ #i;ksa dh LdhEl 'kq: dh xbZ Fkha] os dgha chp esa u jg tk,aA blfy, eSa ljdkj ls tkuuk pkgrk gwa fd os LdhEl dc iwjh gksaxh\ 141 ekuuh; v/;{k% LdhEl ds dEIyh'kal ds fy, tkuuk pkgrs gSaA Jh jouhr flag ¼yqf/k;kuk½% eSa ;g Hkh tkuuk pkgrk gwa fd tks LdhEl iwjh gks pqdh gSa] muds j[k&j[kko ds fy, D;k ljdkj dksbZ iSlk nsxh\ var esa eSa ,d ckr vkSj iwNuk pkgrk gwaA ekuuh; v/;{k% vkidk ,d iwjd iz'u gks x;k gSA Jh jouhr flag ¼yqf/k;kuk½% gekjs :jy ,fj;kt+ esa foftysal ekfuVfjax desVht gSaA mlesa lkaln vkSj fo/kk;d lnL; gSaA gekjh gkml desVh us Hkh QSlyk fd;k gS vkSj dgk gS fd D;ksa ugha 'kgjksa ds fy, Hkh foftysal ekfuVfjax desVh cukbZ tkrh] tks ,d&,d ikbZ dk fglkc j[k ld—A eSa le>rk gwa fd bl ckr ls lkjk lnu Hkh lger gksxkA ;gka ij iz/kkuea=h th Hkh ekStwn gSaA eSa ea=h th ls iwNuk pkgrk gwa fd vcZu ,fj;k ds fy, Hkh D;k foftysal ekfuVfjax desVh cukus ij vki fopkj djsaxs\ Jh ,eñ oSadS¸;k uk;Mw% v/;{k th] tSlk fd ekuuh; lnL; us dgk] eSa crkuk pkgrk gwa fd ;g izksxzke 2005 esa 'kq: fd;k x;k FkkA lu~ 2012 esa ;g ;kstuk lekIr gks xbZ FkhA mlds ckn bls ,d lky ds fy, vkSj ,DlVsaM fd;k x;kA fQj mlds ckn pquko ds nkSjku bls ,d lky dk vkSj ,DlVsa'ku fn;k x;kA mlesa ;g 'krZ j[kh xbZ fd tks LdhEl eatwj dh xbZ gSa] muds fy, iSlk fjyht fd;k tk,xkA mu LdhEl dks 31 ekpZ] 2014 rd iwjk gksuk pkfg, vkSj ;fn os mDr vof/k rd iwjh ugha gksrha rks mudh vkxs dh ns[kHkky izns'k ljdkj dks djuh pkfg,A ;g fu.kZ; ml le; dh ljdkj us rc fy;k Fkk vkSj ;g rF; gSA I am not trying to escape from the responsibility of the present Government but that was the decision taken at that time. The schemes sanctioned during that period have to be completed by 31st March, 2014. That is the factual position. With regard to incomplete works, as the hon. Member has rightly said, there are incomplete works in a number of States and the States are supposed to take care of them. But the States are not in a position to take care of them. That is what the States are saying. They have been coming and meeting me. They have also been writing letters to me. But with the recent increase of funds to the State Governments by the Finance Commission and also with the additional resources made available by the Finance Commission to urban local bodies, this has to be taken care of by the States. In addition to this, what the Centre can do, we are examining it. In between came the recommendation of the Finance Commission and much of the money have gone to States. To be frank, my counterparts in the States have become rich and comparatively I have become poor. I have no problem because it is a policy and my Prime Minister is very keen to seen that the States have to be strengthened. Lastly, what the hon. Member has said is very important. As the Minister of Rural Development, I insisted that there has to be a monitoring and review committee chaired by the Member of Parliament of that particular area. He has given a suggestion for doing it in the urban areas also. At present, only the officers are monitoring them and then I have to answer it is Parliament. Therefore, I shall positively consider this suggestion of making the MPs also as the co-Chairmen because there has to be an 142 official also for the monitoring committee of the cities which fall in their constituency. SHRI P.R. SUNDARAM (NAMAKKAL): Hon. Speaker, Madam, Tamil Nadu has obtained first place in achievement status with regard to utilization of funds for urban development. Guided by our Puratchi Thalaivi Amma, optimal level achievement of Tamil Nadu is 100 per cent. In the State level performance, Tamil Nadu stands first with 99 per cent. Hon. Minister's reply refers to this. I want to know whether such well-performing States like Tamil Nadu will be rewarded by way of providing more number of 'Smart Cities'. SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU: Madam Speaker, I have no hesitation in accepting the fact that Tamil Nadu is one of the better performing States as far as Urban Development is concerned. I had an occasion to review the performance during my visit to Chennai where I had an occasion to meet the then Chief Minister Ms. Jayalalitha. I have publicly accepted it also. It is because there should be an example to other States also. There are some other States also which have done well. Madam, with regard to the sanction of smart cities, naturally the performing States has to be encouraged. We will keep this in mind. The problem is that the smart cities are not going to be allocated. The smart city concept is at the stage of finalization and there will be a city challenging system where the cities, whether they will be eligible or not, will be decided depending on their performance, depending on their credit worthiness and depending on their willingness to get reformed. All these factors are there. When it comes to selecting cities from the State of Tamil Nadu, definitely the point of view of the State will be kept in mind. SHRI B. VINOD KUMAR (KARIMNAGAR): Madam Speaker, the hon. Minister has replied in detail. I would like to ask the hon. Minister whether the scheme, the Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission, will continue which was lauched by the earlier Government. I would like to know whether this Government will continue this project or not. If the Government proposes to continue with the scheme, I would like to know from the Minister whether the Government is proposing to relax the criteria. Earlier, the cities with 10 lakh population were considered under the scheme. 63 cities were considered. If the Government is proposing to continue with the scheme, I would like to know whether they propose to relax the conditions so that many other cities can also come under the purview of this scheme. I would also like to know from the hon. Minister whether the cities which were already under this Mission would once again be considered under smart cities, or the cities which were considered under Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission will be deleted in order to see that more new cities could come under the purview of the smart cities. SHRI M.VENKAIAH NAIDU: Madam, as I mentioned, the scheme was initiated in 2005 and was supposed to be completed by 2012. The then Government had given two extensions, one up to 2013 and another up to 2014 and then it was said that it will come to an end. This was earlier envisaged by the Planning Commission. The present Government is considering launching a new Mission for 143

Urban Rejuvention which has been mentioned in the Budget also. In that scheme, as has been rightly mentioned by the hon. Member, the criteria for major cities is not 10 lakhs and above. The Government now is considering to include cities which are one lakh and above. That means the number will go to 500. With further clarification with regard to the smart cities, some of the cities could become eligible for consideration as smart cities. It is because a smart city is going to be on PPP model. It is not a Government funded scheme. Government will definitely participate put it will be on PPP Model. When cities a become elibigble, they will be taken out of that list and they will be treated separately. PROF. SAUGATA ROY (DUM DUM): The Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission was a Mission mode reforming progroamme which extended from 2005 to 2012 and the total outlay envisaged was rupees one lakh crore. The Mission, as has been mentioned by Shri Ravneet Singh ji, was given a two year extension till March, 2014. Till now very significant work was done in Indore where the Janmarg or the BRTS was made; in Ahmedabad, the Janmarg or the BRTS was made with they money from the JNNURM. Now, there is a peculiar situation because many of the schemes under JNNURM have remained incomplete. The Centre has totally stopped funding these schemes. HON. SPEAKER: Please put your question. PROF. SAUGATA ROY (DUM DUM): Madam, my question is this. For nine months we have been hoping that new Mission, may be not in Jawaharlal Nehru's name be in Deen Dayal Upadhyaya's name, would be launched for the development of the cities. May I ask the hon. Minister, what is the exact plan for an alternative Mission to follow up the Jawaharlal Nehru Urban Renewal Mission which had done quite significant work in the 65 Mission cities throughout the country? SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU: I am not undermining the good work done but there were certain lessons which we have learnt from that previous mission. That mission has come to an end by itself because of the decision taken by the previous Government. What Prof. Saugata Roy is saying is a fact. There is a gap now because certain projects have reached upto a level of, say 50 per cent or 60 per cent or 70 per cent and then they are starving because of funds. But, as I told, we have faced with a situation where the decision was taken earlier that they will be completed with the support of the State funds only. Earlier, the difficulty was that there were no available equivalent funds with the State Governments because they also have paucity of funds. Subsequently, because of the recent decision of the Government, on the basis of the recommendations of the Finance Commission, the States have got some amount of money and the local urban bodies have also got some amount of money. Whether they will be sufficient and whether part of it has to be taken under the new mission is a point which is under the active consideration of the Central Government. I do agree that we have to find a solution to this at the earliest because if the resources which are spent upto 60 per cent or 70 per cent remain idle, then it will be a national waste. So, keeping that in mind, we are holding discussions with the States and shortly, we will come to some conclusion and then move forward. 144

APPENDIX XX GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT LOK SABHA STARRED QUESTION NO. 121 ANSWERED ON 04 MARCH, 2015 Utilisation of Funds for Urban Development 121. SHRI RAMEN DEKA: SHRI RAVNEET SINGH: will the Minister of URBAN DEVELOPMENT be pleased to state: (a) the funds allocated and utilized for the urban development schemes during the last three years and current year, year-wise and scheme-wise; (b) whether large sum of allocations made to States for urban development remained unspent and if so, the details thereof along with the reasons therefor, State and scheme/project-wise; (c) whether any mechanism has been put in place to monitor the utilization of funds allocated to States and if so, the details thereof along with the steps taken/ proposed to be taken to strengthen the mechanism; and (d) the steps taken to make urban local bodies more efficient and empowered to pitch for funds and its utilization? ANSWER THE MINISTER OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT (SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU): (a) to (d) A statement is laid on the Table of the House. STATEMENT STATEMENT REFERRED TO IN REPLY TO THE LOK SABHA STARRED QUESTION NO. 121 FOR 04.03.2015 REGARDING ‘‘UTILISATION OF FUNDS FOR URBAN DEVELOPMENT.’’ (a) & (b) The detials of funds allocated and utilized for the following Urban Development Schemes during the last three years & current year, is given in Annexure-I:— (i) Under Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JNNURM); (ii) Urban Infrastructure Development in Satellite towns around seven Mega Cities (UIDSST) scheme, 10% Lump sum scheme and NERUDP Scheme; (iii) Swachh Bharat Mission; (iv) Metro Rail projects.

144 145

The National Heritage City Development and Augmentation Yojana (HRIDAY), was offcially launched on 21st January, 2015. An outlay of Rs. 200 crore has been earmarked under HRIDAY for the current financial year out of which Rs. 87 lakh has been released till 28.02.2015. During the period 2011-12 to 2013-14, under the aforesaid Schemes, projects are funded as per the respective scheme guidelines in the form of Additional Central Assistant (ACA) and remaining funds are arranged by the States and Urban Local Bodies (ULBs)/Parastatals. Subsequent installment of ACA is released for projects subject to utilization of grants and other conditionalities like achievement of reforms according to the timelines agreed to by the States and ULBs for JNNURM. Hence, question of large amount being unspent does not arise. The reasons for delay in projects during this period are mainly due to capacity constraints of implementing agencies, issues related to land acquisition, problems of contract management at ULB level. During the current financial year, for the new schemes on 100 Smart Cities & New Urban Development Mission, extensive consultations with State Governments and various stakeholders were done. The Schemes are in final stages of design and will be launched soon. (c) Under each different scheme, guidelines have put in place a number of mechanisms to monitor the utilization of funds to States such as:— (i) Regular review and Monitoring at the level of Ministry and State Government by various committees constituted under the specific scheme. (ii) Third party review and monitoring. (iii) Quarterly progress reports submitted by implementing agencies. (iv) Utilization certificates and reports by competent authorities at State level. (d) Regular capacity building programme of the Ministry are aimed towards making ULB's efficient and empowered. JNNURM was a reform linked programme undertaken by the Government of India. Most of the reforms were aimed to make ULB's more efficient and to empower them for better fund utilization. There were 23 reforms identified for implementation, both at State and ULB level, the details of reforms and achievement are at Annexure-II & III. 146 Expdn. (Rs. in Crore) upto ANNEXURE-I 20.02.2015 Expenditure % (RE) 0 Smart cities. Allocation Expdn. Expenditure % (RE) 0.00 0.00 200.00 0.00 0.00 Allocation Expdn. Expenditure % (RE) Allocation MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT MINISTRY Expdn. 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Expenditure % Allocation and Expenditure for the last 4 years Urban Development Schemes Annexure referred to in reply Lok Sabha Starred Question No. 121 for 04/03/2015 (RE) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1690.5* 0.00 164.00 164.00 100.00 145.55 109.98 75.56 150.00 124.81 83.21 150.00 137.85 91.90 5575.08 5454.52 5280 3754.99 7191.14 5438.74 1020.36 1072.43 105** Allocation Provision for North Eastern States Region Urban Development Program (Satellite towns) Development) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Scheme Mission **The expenditure is marginally higher with reference to RE but within BE. Provision for 2014-15 includes New Mission 10 *Provision is provided in 1st Batch of supplementary Demands for Grants 2014-15 and re-appropriation process. 1. JNNURM 2. 10% Lumpsum 3. North Eastern 58.204. UIDSST 42.625. Metro Rail 73.236. Hriday (Heritage 70.00 30.00 5267.27 29.95 5255.95 69.58 99.79 99.83 99.40 5054.63 50.00 4865.80 30.00 48.78 96.26 24.02 5759.91 97.56 5528.26 80.07 244.30 95.98 70.00 6167.78 131.21 69.03 53.71 5577.53 90.43 98.61 82.00 82.20 100.24 7. Swachh Bharat ANNEXURE-II

Sl. No. State Level Reforms 1. Implementation of 74th CAA 2. Integration of City Planning & Delivery Functions 3. Reform in Rent Control 4. Stamp duty rationalization to 5% 5. Repeal of ULCRA 6. Enactment of Community Participation Law 7. Enactment of Public Disclosure Law ULB Level Reforms 1. e-Governance 2. Shift to Accrual based Double Entry Accounting 3. Property Tax (85% Coverage & 90% Collection Efficiency) 4. 100% cost recovery (Water Supply & SWM) 5. Internal Earmarking of Funds for Services to Urban Poor 6. Provision of Basic Services to Urban Poor Optional Reforms 1. Revision of Building Bye laws—To make rain water harvesting mandatory 2. Revision of Building Bye laws—streamlining the Approval Process 3. Bye laws on Reuse of Recycled Water 4. Simplification of Legal and Procedural framework for conversion of agricultural land for non-agricultural purposes 5. Introduction of computerized process of Registration of land and Property 6. Encouraging PPP 7. Earmarking 25% developed land in all housing projects for EWS/LIG 8. Administrative Reforms 9. Structural Reforms 10. Introduction of Property Title Certification System in municipalities

147 ANNEXURE-III Reform achievement status as on March, 2014

Sl. State ULB State Optional Overall No. Level Level Level Score 1. Andhra Pradesh 95 96 90 93.3 2. Arunachal Pradesh 34 86 82 70.3 3. Assam 62 93 86 81.6 4. Bihar 69 73 73 72 5. Chandigarh 72 95 91 87.3 6. Chhattisgarh 89 94 88 89.9 7. Delhi 84 93 83 86.3 8. Goa 67 84 93 83.3 9. Gujarat 92 91 96 93.5 10. Haryana 77 71 74 74 11. Himachal Pradesh 77 100 95 91.7 12. Jammu & Kashmir 76 93 95 89.3 13. Jharkhand 56 86 63 68.5 14. Karnataka 97 97 95 96.1 15. Kerala 99 93 90 93.3 16. Madhya Pradesh 88 86 85 85.9 17. Maharashtra 99 100 100 99.8 18. Manipur 22 59 60 49.8 19. Meghalaya 79 76 58 68.6 20. Mizoram 51 89 80 75.2 21. Nagaland 7 79 43 44.3 22. Odisha 75 79 79 77.8 23. Puducherry 63 93 88 82.8 24. Punjab 82 93 90 88.8 25. Rajasthan 78 93 87 86.5 26. Sikkim 44 69 58 57.6 27. Tamil Nadu 99.5 99 100 99.6 28. Telangana 99 96 90 94.3 29. Tripura 73 88 64 73.5 30. Uttar Pradesh 85 90 88 88 31. Uttarakhand 70 86 79 78.7 32. West Bengal 82 77 100 88.3 Overall Score 80 87 86 84

148 149

(Q. 121) SHRI RAMEN DEKA (MANGALDAI): Thank you, Madam.This is my first chance to ask a Question as I always miss my chance due to adjournment. The reply of the hon. Minister is elaborate but I still want to ask a question to the hon. Minister through you. I would like to know whether the Government has any proposal to inquire into the utilization of fund under JNNURM in Guwahati and other Municipal Boards in Assam as there are allegations of mis-utilisation of this fund. Jh ,eñ oSadS¸;k uk;Mw% v/;{k th] ,d LisflfQd loky ekuuh; lnL; us iwNk gS] vHkh esjs ikl ,slh fdlh f'kdk;r dh tkudkjh ugha gS] exj vle ls ts,u,u;wvkj,e ds lanHkZ esa dksbZ f'kdk;r vk,xh rks e® mls ns[kwaxk vkSj vxj f'kdk;r xaHkhj gqbZ rks t:j mlds Åij buDok;jh djk ysaxsA SHRI RAMEN DEKA (MANGALDAI): Rain is a major problem in Assam. Due to rain there are fresh floods in all the urban areas, especially in my constituency Mangaldai, Nalbari, Guwahati. I would like to know whether the Government has any plan to overcome fresh floods due to rain in urban areas of Assam. SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU: Madam, Speaker, it is a general question. It is a fact that because of Brahmaputra and because of heavy rains frequent floods are affecting the State of Assam, more particularly Guwahati city. That being the case, if the State Government has some definite proposal, we will consider whether it fits within our scheme or has to be tackled by the Water Resource Ministry because water resource subject is allotted to that particular Ministry. The hon. Member should first take up the issue with the State Government and then if there is some specific proposal the concerned Ministry will get it examined. Whatever support the Ministry of Urban Development can extend, we will extend it. Jh jouhr flag ¼yqf/k;kuk½% v/;{k egksn;k] tokgjyky usg: us'kuy vcZu fjU;wvy fe'ku ;wih,&1 ljdkj us fnlEcj] 2005 esa lkr o"kks± ds fy, 'kq: fd;k FkkA ckn esa mls nks lky ds fy, vkSj c<+k;k x;k] ekpZ] 2014 rd c<+k;k x;kA blds v/khu izkstsDV~l esa okVj lIykbZ] lSfuVs'ku] lhojst] lkWfyM osLV eSustesaV] jksM usVodZ] vcZu VªkaliksVZ vkfn vge izkstsDV~l 'kgjksa ds fy, FksA vcZu baQzkLVªDpj MsoyiesaV Ldhe esa NksVs VkmUl ds fy, 6607 djksM+ #i;s ls vf/kd /ku ljdkj us rhu o"kks± esa fn,A blds v/khu fofHkUUk jkT;ksa ,oa fefuLVªht us 3384 djksM+ #i;s [kpZ fd,A baQzkLVªDpj ,aM xous±l ij] ;wñvkbZñthñ Ldhe esa 3]442 djksM+ #i, 2011 ls 2014 rd fn, x,A mlesa ls 923 djksM+ #i, [kpZ fd, x,A ;fn ,sls gh eSa lkjs ns'k dh fLFkfr dh ckr d:a] [kkldj eSa vius lalnh; {ks= yqf/k;kuk dh ckr d:a rks cgqr cM+h jde ljdkj us 'kgjksa ds fy, nh FkhA ysfdu vkt dbZ izkstsDV~l pkgs lhojst dk gks] jksM dk gks ;k ;krk;kr ;kuh clksa dk gks] os lkjs izkstsDV~l dgha u dgha v/kwjs iM+s gSaA blls cgqr cM+k [krjk cu x;k gS] D;ksafd dHkh bl ckjs esa dksbZ Li"Vhdj.k ugha vk;kA fyf[kr tokc esa Hkh crk;k x;k gS fd jkT;ksa ds lkFk ppkZ gks jgh gSA eSa iwNuk pkgrk gwa fd vc dkSu lh Ldhe ljdkj cukus tk jgh gS\ eSa dguk pkgrk gwa fd bl ;kstuk ds rgr dbZ gtkj djksM+ #i;ksa dh LdhEl 'kq: dh xbZ Fkha] os dgha chp esa u jg tk,aA blfy, eSa ljdkj ls tkuuk pkgrk gwaa fd os LdhEl dc iwjh gksaxh\ 150 ekuuh; v/;{k% LdhEl ds dEIyh'kal ds fy, tkuuk pkgrs gSaA Jh jouhr flag ¼yqf/k;kuk½% eSa ;g Hkh tkuuk pkgrk gwa fd tks LdhEl iwjh gks pqdh gSa] muds j[k&j[kko ds fy, D;k ljdkj dksbZ iSlk nsxh\ var esa eSa ,d ckr vkSj iwNuk pkgrk gwaA ekuuh; v/;{k% vkidk ,d iwjd iz'u gks x;k gSA Jh jouhr flag ¼yqf/k;kuk½% gekjs :jy ,fj;kt esa foftysal ekWuhVfjax desVht gSaA mlesa lkaln vkSj fo/kk;d lnL; gSaA gekjh gkml desVh us Hkh QSlyk fd;k gS vkSj dgk gS fd D;ksa ugha 'kgjksa ds fy, Hkh foftysal ekWuhVfjax desVh cukbZ tkrh] tks ,d&,d ikbZ dk fglkc j[k ldsA eSa le>rk gwa fd bl ckr ls lkjk lnu Hkh lger gksxkA ;gka ij iz/kku ea=h th Hkh ekStwn gSaA eSa ea=h th ls iwNuk pkgrk gwa fd vcZu ,fj;k ds fy, Hkh D;k foftysal ekWuhVfjax desVh cukus ij vki fopkj djsaxs\ Jh ,eñ oSadS¸;k uk;Mw% v/;{k th] tSlk fd ekuuh; lnL; us dgk] eSa crkuk pkgrk gwa fd ;g izksxzke 2005 esa 'qk: fd;k x;k FkkA lu~ 2012 esa ;g ;kstuk lekIr gks xbZ FkhA mlds ckn bls ,d lky ds fy, vkSj ,DlVsaM fd;k x;kA fQj mlds ckn pquko ds nkSjku bls ,d lky dk vkSj ,DlVsa'ku fn;k x;kA mlesa ;g 'krZ j[kh xbZ fd tks LdhEl eatwj dh xbZ gSa] muds fy, iSlk fjyht fd;k tk,xkA mu LdhEl dks 31 ekpZ] 2014 rd iwjk gksuk pkfg, vkSj ;fn os mDr vof/k rd iwjh ugha gksrha rks mudh vkxs dh ns[kHkky izns'k ljdkj dks djuh pkfg,A ;g fu.kZ; ml le; dh ljdkj us rc fy;k Fkk vkSj ;g rF; gSA I am not trying to escape from the responsibility of the present Government but that was the decision taken at that time. The schemes sanctioned during that period have to be completed by 31st March, 2014. That is the factual position. With regard to incomplete works, as the hon. Member has rightly said, there are incomplete works in a number of States and the States are supposed to taken care of them. But the States are not in a position to take care of them. That is what the States are saying. They have been coming and meeting me. They have also been writing letters to me. But with the recent increase of funds to the State Governments by the Finance Commission and also with the additional resources made available by the Finance Commission to urban local bodies, this has to be taken care of by the States. In addition to this, what the Centre can do, we are examining it. In between came the recommendation of the Finance Commission and much of the money have gone to States. To be frank, my counterparts in the States have become rich and comparatively I have become poor. I have no problem because it is a policy and my Prime Minister is very keen to see that the States have to be strengthened. Lastly, what the hon. Member has said is very important. As the Minister of Rural Development, I insisted that there has to be a monitoring and review committee chaired by the Member of Parliament of that particular area. He has given a suggestion for doing it in the urban areas also. At present, only the officers are monitoring them and then I have to answer it in Parliament. Therefore, I shall positively consider this suggestion of making the MPs also as the co-chairmen because there has to be an official also for the monitoring committee of the cities which fall in their constituency. 151

SHRI P.R. SUNDARAM (NAMAKKAL): Hon. Speaker, Madam, Tamil Nadu has obtained first place in achievement status with regard to utilization of funds for urban development. Guided by our Puratchi Thalaivi Amma, optimal level of achievement of Tamil Nadu is 100 per cent. In the State level performance, Tamil Nadu stands first with 99 per cent. Hon. Minister's reply refers to this. I want to know whether such well-performing States like Tamil Nadu will be rewarded by way of providing more number of 'Smart Cities'. SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU: Madam Speaker, I have no hesitation in accepting the fact that Tamil Nadu is one of the better performing States as far as Urban Development is concerned. I had an occasion to review the performance during my visit to Chennai where I had an occasion to meet the then Chief Minister Ms. Jayalalitha. I have publicly accepted it also. It is because there should be an example to other States also. There are some other States also which have done well. Madam, with regard to the sanction of smart cities, naturally the performing States has to be encouraged. We will keep this in mind. The problem is that the smart cities are not going to be allocated. The smart city concept is at the stage of finalization and there will be a city challenging system where the cities, whether they will be eligible or not, will be decided depending on their performance, depending on their credit worthiness and depending on their willingness to get reformed. All these factors are there. When it comes to selecting cities from the State of Tamil Nadu, definitely the point of view of the State will be kept in mind. SHRI B. VINOD KUMAR (KARIMNAGAR): Madam Speaker, the hon. Minister has replied in detail. I would like to ask the hon. Minister whether the scheme, the Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission, will continue which was launched by the earlier Government. I would like to know whether this Government will continue this project or not. If the Government proposes to continue with the scheme, I would like to know from the Minister whether the Government is proposing to relax the criteria. Earlier, the cities with 10 lakh population were considered under the scheme. 63 cities were considered. If the Government is proposing to continue with the scheme, I would like to know whether they propose to relax the conditions so that many other cities can also come under the purview of this scheme. I would also like to know from the hon. Minister whether the cities which were already under this Mission would once again be considered under smart cities, or the cities which were considered under Jawaharlal Nehru Urban Renewal Mission will be deleted in order to see that more new cities could come under the purview of the smart cities. SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU: Madam, as I mentioned, the scheme was initiated in 2005 and was supposed to be completed by 2012. The then Government had given two extensions, one up to 2013 and another up to 2014 and then it was said that it will come to an end. This was earlier envisaged by the Planning Commission. The present Government is considering launching a new Mission for Urban Rejuvenation which has been mentioned in the Budget also. In that scheme, 152 as has been rightly mentioned by the hon. Member, the criteria for major cities is not 10 lakhs and above. The Government now is considering to include cities which are one lakh and above. That means the number will go to 500. With further clarification with regard to the smart cities, some of the city could become eligible for consideration as smart cities. It is because a smart city is going to be on PPP model. It is not a Government funded scheme. Government will definitely participate but it will be on PPP model. When cities become eligible, they will be taken out of that list and they will be treated separately. PROF. SAUGATA ROY (DUM DUM): The Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission as a Mission mode reforming programme which extend from 2005 to 2012 and the total outlay envisaged was rupees one lakh crore. The Mission, as has been mentioned by Shri Ravneet Singh Ji, was given a two year extension till March, 2014. Till now very significant work was done in Indore where the Janmarg or the BRTS was made in Ahmedabad, the Janmarg or the BRTS was made with the money from the JNNURM. Now, there is a peculiar situation because many of the schemes under JNNURM have remained imcomplete. The Centre has totally stopped funding these schemes. HON. SPEAKER: Please put your question. PROF. SAUGATA ROY (DUM DUM): Madam my question is this. For nine months we have been hoping that a new Mission, may be not in Jawharhlal Nehru's name, may be in Deen Dayal Upadhyay's name, would be launched for the development of the cities. May I ask the hon. Minister, what is the exact plan for an alternative Mission to follow up the Jawaharlal Nehru Urban Renewal Mission which had done quite significant work in the 65 Mission cities throughout the country? SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU: I am not undermining the good work done but there were certain lessons which we have learnt from that previous mission. That mission has come to an end by itself because of the decision taken by the previous Government. What Prof. Saugata Roy is saying is a fact. There is a gap now because certain projects have reached upto a level of, say, 50 per cent or 60 per cent or 70 per cent and then they are starving because of funds. But, as I told, we have faced with a situation where the decision was taken earlier that they will be completed with the support of the State funds only. Earlier, the difficulty was that there were no available equivalent funds with the State Government because they also have paucity of funds. Subsequently, because of the recent decision of the Government, on the basis of the recommendations of the Finance Commission, the States have got some amount of money and the urban local bodies have also got some amount of money. Whether they will be sufficient and whether part of it has to be taken under the new mission is a point which is under the active consideration of the Central Government. I do agree that we have to find a solution to this at the earliest because if the resources which are spent upto 60 per cent or 70 per cent remain idle, then it will be a national waste. So, keeping that in mind, we are holding discussion with the States and shortly, we will come to some conclusion and then move forward. APPENDIX XXI GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT LOK SABHA STARRED QUESTION NO. 125 ANSWERED ON 04.03.2015 PPP for Infrastructure Development 125. SHRI NIMMALA KRISTAPPA: Will the Minister of URBAN DEVELOPMENT be pleased to state: (a) the details of the ongoing Public Private Partnership (PPP) projects for infrastructure development in the urban sector along with the nature of infrastructure develolpment involved therein, State-wise; (b) the details of the Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) inflow for urban infrastructure development during the last three years and the current year, State-wise and sector-wise; (c) whether the Government has reviewed/monitored the implementation of PPP; and (d) if so, the outcome thereof? ANSWER THE MINISTER OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT (SHRI. M. VENKAIAH NAIDU): (a) to (b) A Statement is laid on the Table of the House. STATEMENT REFERRED TO IN REPLY TO PARTS (A) TO (D) OF LOK SABHA STARRED QUESTION NO. 125 TO BE ANSWERED ON 04.03.2015 REGARDING PPP FOR INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT (a) A list of ongoing public private partnership (PPP) projects for infrastructure development in Urban sector along with the nature of infrastructure is placed at Annexure I. (b) List of Urban Infrastructure development projects in which Foreign Direct Investment was permitted in last 3 years and the current year is placed at Annexure II. (c) & (d) Yes, Madam. The PPP projects developed under Ministry of Urban Development are monitored from time-to-time by the Central Sanctioning & Monitoring Committee. The list of completed projects under PPP is placed at Annexure III.

153 154 ' 8.67 16.04 43.24 27.83 312.14 144.64 476.62 434.22 Approved ANNEXURE 1 Cost (in crores) Sector Transport System Management Management Transport System Transport System Management Management otal (23 Kms) Management of Indore City Solid Waste Corridor for Mumbai Pune Highway (8.5 Kms) and Mass Rapid trengthening of Solid Waste Management (Phase-I)trengthening of Solid Waste Solid Waste Audh Rawet Road (14.5 Kms) T Audh Rawet Road (14.5 Kms) Lifting water from Pench Reservoir and Conveying uptoMahadulla by mortar lined MS pipeline in lieu of canal Management for ShimlaWaste Solid Water Supply Solid Waste Bus Rapid Transit (Phase I) for Pune city - 48.77 Km Mass Rapid Integrated Municipal Solid Waste StrategyWaste Integrated Municipal Solid Games, 2008) - 36.00 Km Youth for Commonwealth Solid Waste Bus Rapid Transport system (Development of Infrastructure Mass Rapid Name of Project Title the City Nagpur Indore Solid Waste Shimla Mysore Pradesh Pradesh Statement in reply to part (a) of Lok Sabha Starred Question No. 125 for 4.3.2015 regarding 'PPP for infrastructure development infrastructure for 'PPP 4.3.2015 regarding Question No. 125 for to part (a) of Lok Sabha Starred in reply Statement Sl. Name of the 121. 3 Maharashtra Pune BRTS 4 5 6 No. State 2. Maharashtra 4. Madhya 3. Himachal 5. Maharashtra6. Pune Karnataka 8. Gujarat Rajkot S 7. Maharashtra Pune 155 30.41 25.81 30.84 42.92 43.57 206.82 274.44 469.31 451.70 116.72 System Transport System Management Solid Waste Management Management Transport System Management Management Management Ahmedabad Solid Waste long) Transport aste Management in Agraaste Management in Solid Waste Phase-II for Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation -Phase-II for Mass Rapid Corridor-Nashik Phata to Wakad (Trunk Route No. 9)- (Trunk Wakad Phata to Corridor-Nashik Mass Rapid PCMC - 7.08 Km Transit System (42.19 Km Municipal Solid W Municipal Solid Bus Rapid Transit System for Visakhapatnam (i)Visakhapatnam System for Transit Bus Rapid (ii) Pendurthi Transit Corridor - 45.20 Km Management in LucknowWaste Municipal Solid Mass Rapid Solid Waste 30.50 Km Solid Waste Management in Waste Solid Municipal Solid Waste Management in Asansol Urban AreaAsansol Urban Management in Municipal Solid Waste Solid Waste isakha- Imphal SolidWaste Management for Imphal Bhopal Pilot Corridor (New Market to University) for Bus RapidAgra Mass Rapid patnamLucknow Simhachalam Transit corridor including tunnel Transport System Ahmedabad BRTS Ahmedabad Asansol Pradesh Pradesh 9. Maharashtra Pune BRTS 10. Uttar Pradesh AllahabadAllahabad management for Waste Solid Solid Waste 12. Manipur 11. Madhya 13. Uttar Pradesh 16. Uttar Pradesh 14. Gujarat 15. Andhra V 17. Gujarat 18. Bengal West 156 6.51 44.21 35.17 48.68 178.79 469.02 260.36 151.00 219.20 Management Management Transport System Mass Rapid Transport System Management Management Transport Mass Rapid Transport System Dehu-Alandi Road Route No. 5 (v) S.N. Puram - 29.90 Km Mass Rapid aste Management of Varanasiaste Management of Solid Waste Corridor-Kalewadi-KSB Chowk to Corridor-Kalewadi-KSB (Package - IIIA & IIIB), Jaipur - 39.45 Km (for (Package - IIIA lid Waste Management project, Greater MumbaiWaste lid Solid Waste Development of BRTS for Surat Development of BRTS (iv) Road Nujiveedu Road (iii) Eluru Road (vi) Loop - 15.18 Km Management for GuwahatiWaste Solid Solid Waste Tambaram Municipality Tambaram all 3 projects) (i) MG Road (ii)Vijayawada System for Transport Bus Rapid Mass Rapid Transport System Bus Terminus Near Kalyani Railway StationTerminus Bus (Trunk Route 7)-PCMC - 11.20 Km Other Urban Greater So Guwahati Mumbai Chennai Pallavaram andAlandur, Management of Waste Solid Jaipur Solid Waste BRTS Kolkata Pradesh 12 3 4 5 6 19. Maharashtra 24. Assam 20. Nadu Tamil 21. Gujarat22. Rajasthan Surat 23. Andhra Vijayawada 25. Uttar Pradesh Varanasi26. Bengal West W Solid 27. Maharashtra Pune BRTS 157 11.56 24.56 50.42 88.12 58.05 51.39 56.00 22.59 24.60 387.86 Management spaces on PPP basis Management Management Management Management Management Danapur aste Management Solid Waste of multi-level parking at 20 different locations in Parking lots and aste Management for Kochi Solid Waste aste Improvement Management Scheme Solid Waste Integrated Solid Waste Management in Patna UA towns - Management in Patna UA Waste Integrated Solid Phulwarishariff, Khagul and Solid Waste Solid Waste Management in Thiruvananthapuram Management in Waste Solid Solid Waste Integrated Road and Multi level Parking Project at Kohima Parking lots and Solid Waste ManagementSolid Waste Solid Waste Indore cityIndore ManagementMunicipal Solid Waste Solid Waste spaces on PPP basis Rehabilitation Plan to implement 24x7 water supply project for Water Supply Nagpur city under PPP framework W Integrated Solid ayawada Solid W Patna Thiruvanantha- puramKohima Management Kochi Solid W Ranchi Meerut Nagpur Dehradun Indore Construction Pradesh Pradesh 28. Bihar 29. Kerala 30. Nagaland 31. Kerala 32. Andhra33. Jharkhand Vij 36. Uttar Pradesh 34. Maharashtra 37. Uttarakhand 35. Madhya 158 16.72 36.95 55.86 41.73 77.82 255.73 3586.00 2356.00 14132.00 25,902.84 Management Management Management Management System Roads/Flyovers/ Mass Rapid Transport System Maya bazar in RoB International) Airport, System via IGI (Indira Gandhi via trengthening of Solid Waste Management of RajkotWaste trengthening of Solid Solid Waste Integrated Solid Waste Management in HaridwarWaste Integrated Solid Solid Waste Municipal Solid Waste Management for Patna townWaste Municipal Solid Solid Waste Batanagar on Budge Trunk Road RoB Solid Waste ManagementSolid Waste Durgapur Construction of elevated road between Jinzira Bazzar and Roads/ Flyovers/ Solid Waste Improvement, upgradation & strengthening of road for Gammon bridge to Gandhi more (NH-2) High Speed Express Link from New Delhi Railway Station to Mass Rapid Transport Hyderabad Metro Rail Project, Length 71.16 kmMumbai Metro Line 1, Length 11.40 km Mass Rapid Transport GRAND TOTAL Haridwar Patna Kolkata Asansol Delhi Mumbai of NationalCapital of Delhi Territory Dwarka Sector-21 Length 19.2 km 12 3 4 5 6 38. Uttarakhand 39. Bihar 43. Gujarat Rajkot S 42. Bengal West 40. Jharkhand41. Dhanbad Bengal West 44. Government 46. Maharashtra 45. Telangana Hyderabad 159 ' 7.35 3.20 3.13 96.55 255.93 311.67 327.77 541.97 1,509.28 41.04 17.73 19.21 ANNEXURE II 139.00 27.97 5,22.48 18,33.98 0.00 1.08 0.79 3.13 21.08 13,18.50 56.96 17,91.23 35.14 55.63 30,47.55 101.86 278.48 8044.91 Apr-Dec 19.21 1,26.92 6,19.91 3,46.42 2,12.67 3,33.23 16,72.37 0.00 19.64 43.06 130.44 164.09 215.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 86.69 14.63 1,14.75 8,21.51 2,55.78 9,88.74 12,96.57 4.91 4.10 0.67 6.50 2.12 1.09 0.18 4.68 84.09 28.74 155.94 436.67 142.24 Apr-Mar Apr-Mar 5.80 1.07 26.94 11.42 housing, built-up infrastructure and construction-development projects 4,56.52 1,55.39 8,51.56 7,65.63 23,92.86 13.11 50.63 71.82 45.71 630.04 129.06 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Total FDI FDI FDI FDI FDI FDI FDI FDI FDI FDI 0.09 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.02 3.50 0.69 0.54 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 in Rs in US$ in Rs in US$ in Rs in US$ in Rs in US$ in Rs in US$ YEAR-WISE FDI EQUITY INFLOWS FROM APRIL 2011 TO DECEMBER 2014 TO 2011 APRIL INFLOWS FROM YEAR-WISE FDI EQUITY 63.97 14.25 75.00 13.72 Crores million Crores million Crores million Crores million Crores million 6,20.31 2,37.17 3,37.46 2,17.32 6,52.13 29,90.93 than amil Nadu, Pondicherry STATEMENT ON FINANCIAL ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT Andhra Pradesh Bihar, Jharkhand Kerala, Lakshadweep Chhattisgarh Maharashtra, Dadra & Nagar Haveli, Daman & Diu Madhya Pradesh, Uttranchal Sector CONSTRUCTION DEVELOPMENT: Townships, Townships, Sector CONSTRUCTION DEVELOPMENT: Statement in reply to part (b) of Lok Sabha Starred Question No. 125 for 4.3.2015 regarding 'PPP for infrastructure development infrastructure for 'PPP Question No. 125 for 4.3.2015 regarding to part (b) of Lok Sabha Starred in reply Statement 1 . Hyderabad 2. Patna 3 . Ahmedabad4. Bangalore Gujarat Karnataka 7 . Mumbai 5. Kochi 8 . Bhubaneshwar Orissa 6. Bhopal 9 . Jaipur Rajas No. RBI of Apr-Mar Sl. Regional Offices States Covered 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 10. Chennai T 11. Kanpur Uttar Pradesh, 160 2,368.66 6,405.94 74.15 14.90 1633.18 313.56 3206.52 623.07 0.67 5.36 146.42 125,61.44 706.62 34,255.72 0.13 0.02 8,85.60 42,63.53 78.46 38.87 31.90 520.74 4,85.44 2,32.86 32,19.48 4.47 1.00 0.16 4.00 97.92 290.38 23.78 5,36.38 9.59 137.16 509.27 376.67 69.56 3,140.78 72,47.80 1,332.49 75,08.36 1,226.05 0.94 0.19 3.47 0.65 0.35 0.06 0.00 0.00 4.76 0.90 45.38 6,11.23 68,89.97 1,411.12 15,66.39 25,65.09 15236.03 est Bengal, Sikkim, Andaman & Nicobar Islands Chandigarh, Punjab, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh Delhi, Part of UP and Haryana Region not indicated Grand Total indicated 13. Chandigarh 14. New Delhi 15. Panaji Goa 1212. Kolkata W 316. Region not 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1213 161 ' 14.18 98.45 54.30 73.52 11.94 87.60 52.50 30.99 crores) 103.14 405.72 110.00 Cost (in Approved opment ANNEXURE III ater Supply Mass Rapid Transport System Mass Rapid Transport System Solid Waste Management Solid Waste Solid Waste Management Solid Waste System Mass Rapid Transport System Mass Rapid Transport System Management Solid Waste Sector 1.65km Surat Management Solid Waste opment of Blue Corridor Part I) - 29.00 Km (Devel Project Title m-PILOT PROJECT-1 Waste Management in Waste aste Management for Vadodara aste Management for Pilot project for Pune city (Katraj Swargate Hadapsar Route 17.00 Km) Pilot project for Pune city (Katraj Swargate ater Supply to Gas affected Areas ater Supply to Gas affected W Bus Rapid Transport Syste Transport Bus Rapid Management for NashikWaste Solid Management Waste Solid Solid Waste Management Scheme for Faridabad Waste Solid Bus Rapid Transit System Phase I Bus Rapid Transport System-Construction of 12 Km. long stretch (Stretch-1 Roadway and Carrying out detailed studies engineering of first phase) BRT remaining stretches Mass Rapid Transport Bus Rapid Transit System - 46 Km Setting up of Municipal Solid Waste Management in a scientific way for capital complex Waste Setting up of Municipal Solid adodara Solid W Pune BRT Faridabad Rajkot Itanagar Pradesh Pradesh Pradesh Statement in reply to part (c) & (d) of Lok Sabha Starred Question No. 125 for 4.3.2015 regarding 'PPP for infrastructure devel infrastructure for 'PPP 4.3.2015 regarding Question No. 125 for to part (c) & (d) of Lok Sabha Starred in reply Statement 11. Maharashtra 10. Maharashtra Nashik 9. Madhya Indore 8. Madhya Bhopal W 6. Gujarat 7. Haryana V 4. Gujarat 5. Gujarat Surat Upgradation of Solid 3. Gujarat Ahmedabad 2. Gujarat Ahmedabad No. the State the City Sl. Name of Name of 12 3 1. Arunachal 4 5 6 162 9.92 56.59 26.07 34.07 56.24 74.29 96.51 31.48 70.45 36.49 13.20 75.19 36.48 1,659.32 Sewerage Solid Waste Management Solid Waste Solid Waste Management Solid Waste Sewerage Mass Rapid Transport System Management Solid Waste Transport System Sikar Mass Rapid via Sector Supply Water age System at for Madurai Industrial Township Authority Industrial Township ement and Strengthening of New Alandi Road as BRT corridor for Alandi Road as BRT of New ement and Strengthening Development and Management of Water Supply and Sewer Water Development and Management of Development and Management of Water Supply and Sewerage System at Sector V Supply and Sewerage System at Sector Water Development and Management of Municipal Solid Waste Management of Municipal Tours Management of Municipal Waste Municipal Solid under Naba Diganta V authority at Township under Naba Diganta Industrial (Part-II Sewerage system) Salt Lake Management Waste Solid Municipal Solid Waste Management in MathuraWaste Municipal Solid Management Waste Solid Municipal Solid Waste Management in Kanpur Waste Municipal Solid Solid Waste Management for CoimbatoreWaste Solid Management Waste Solid Construction of additional sewerage treatment plant 54 MLD at Perungudi Solid Waste Management for ChennaiWaste Solid Management Waste Solid Pune (13.9 km. from Vikrantwadi to Dighi-Octroi Naka) Vikrantwadi Pune (13.9 km. from Road - 39.45 Km. (for all 3 projects) Solid Waste Management - Pimpri-ChinchwadWaste Solid Management Waste Solid Sub Total (Completed) Sub Total Kolkata Kolkata Kolkata Coimbatore Pune Improv Jaipur project proposal (Package IB) from C zone Bypass crossing to Panipech BRTS Chennai Jaipur Management for Jaipur Waste Solid Chennai Pune Pradesh Pradesh 23. Bengal West 24. Bengal West 22. Bengal West 21. Uttar Mathura 20. Uttar Kanpur 19. Nadu Tamil Madurai Management Waste Solid 18. Nadu Tamil 13. Maharashtra 15. Rajasthan 17. Nadu Tamil 14. Rajasthan 16. Nadu Tamil 12 312. Maharashtra 4 5 6 163 Jh izgykn flag iVsy ¼neksg½% v/;{k egksn;k] ekuuh; ea=h th us tks mÙkj fn;k gS] mlds fy, eSa mUgsa /kU;okn nsrk gwaA e/; izns'k esa Hkksiky vkSj bUnkSj] bu nksuksa txgksa ij iSlk fn;k x;k gSA Hkksiky esa tks cl dh ysu cuk;h x;h gS] og 42 fdyksehVj gSaA mlesa csrgk'kk ,DlhMsaV~l gq, gSaA bUnkSj esa rks vHkh ml ij dke 'kq: gks jgk gSA essjk vkids ek/;e ls ea=h th ls ;g iz'u gS fd D;k bu ;kstukvksa esa iSlk nsus ds lkFk&lkFk mudh rduhd ds ckjs esa Hkh igys ls dksbZ vkWCtosZ'ku gksrk gS\ mlesa dksbZ vUMjikl ugha gS vkSj mlds chp esa gh clsa pyrh gSaA Hkksiky esa ,slh yxHkx nl fjiksV~lZ vkbZ gksaxh tgka cM+h ek=k esa ,DlhMsaV~l ds dkj.k yksxksa dh ekSr gqbZ gSaA D;k ekuuh; ea=h th blesa iSlk nsus ds igys blds ,d rduhdh ,izwoy ds ckjs esa fopkj djsaxs\ ,slh ;kstuk,a] tks nq?kZVuk dk dkj.k cu jgh gSa] D;k muesa dksbZ la'kks/ku djus dk fopkj ljdkj dk gS\

SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU: Madam Speaker, it is a specific question. Let the hon. Member write to me. I will get it examined and inform him. In general what he has asked is, before releasing money whether any technical feasibility study is conducted. That is the practice. Without conducting feasibility study and technical report, we cannot sanction any scheme. If the hon. Member writes to me about this particular case, then definitely I will get it examined and inform him. KUMARI SUSHMITA DEV (SILCHAR): Madam Speaker, I fully appreciate that private sector investment is absolutely necessary for building infrastructure because Government resources are sometimes not sufficient. From the data, as has been given by the hon. Minister, there is no FDI in the State of Assam, and only PPP project is there in the capital, Guwahati. After the 74th Constitutional Amendment, Urban Local Bodies are Urban Local Self-Governments. Therefore, the Urban Local Bodies have some amount of autonomy. To attract Private investment at the municipal level, is there any role, which is independent of the State Government, to be played by the Urban Local Bodies? What is the method? I would like the hon. Minister to explain this. SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU: Madam, with regard to Public Private Partnership or even with regard to FDI also, the Urban Local Body has to, first of all, prepare a Project Report. Then, the State Government also examines the Project Report. If it is a Public Private Partnership, there has to be some Government sanctioning or Government support. If tomorrow something goes wrong, then the Government has to extend its support. Otherwise, private people will not come. But at the same time, the spirit of the hon. Member's question is regarding the role of the Urban Local Body. The Urban Local Body has to play the main role. Preparation of Plan has to be done by the Urban Local Body. It has to be vetted by the Competent Technical Committee, then the State also endorses it and then the Centre supports that programme. But the issue is that, as I have explained earlier in my response to the earlier question, not only willingness but also preparedness of the Urban Local 164

Body is very important. Then only private people will be convinced to put their money. The point is as to how the get back their money. That is also one of the concerns. PPP projects related to community toilets are to be done by the Urban Local Bodies only. As far as that is concerned, it is within our right. We have given that power to the Urban Local Bodies. If they prepare a Plan, then we sanction money, and they can be executed under their supervision only. Jh jk?ko y[kuiky ¼lgkjuiqj½% egksn;k] ge tkurs gSa fd gekjs ns'k ds lsdsaM vkSj FkMZ Vh;j 'kgjksa esa vukf/kd`r dkyksfu;ka cgqr cM+h la[;k esa gSaA esjs vius {ks= lgkjuiqj uxj esa gh 65 izfr'kr ls vf/kd dkyksfu;ka vukf/kd`r gSaA ,slh dkyksfu;ksa esa u rks fodkl izkf/kdj.k dke djrk gS] u gh uxj fuxe dksbZ dke djus esa leFkZrk trkrk gS vkSj u gh lkaln fuf/k ;k fo/kk;d fuf/k ls dksbZ dk;Z gks ldrs gSaA esjk ekuuh; ea=h th ls ;g iz'u gS fd ,slh vukf/kd`r dkyksfu;ksa esa fodkl djokus gsrq ljdkj dh D;k dksbZ fo'ks"k ;kstuk gS ;k rS;kj dh tk,xh vkSj ljdkj D;k blesa ihñihñihñ ekWMy ;k ,QñMhñvkbZñ ds ek/;e ls dk;Z djokus ij fopkj djsxh\

SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU: Madam Speaker, the problem is that the Panchayat is also looking towards Delhi; the Municipality is also looking towards Delhi; and the State Governments are also looking towards Delhi. We want to decentralize; and then we want the Urban Local Body or the Rural Local Body to take an active part in implementing schemes. Secondly, with regard to unauthorized colonies, regularization of unauthorized colonies or redevelopment of those colonies is the basic work of the State Government because the Centre cannot intervene due to land being a State Subject. So, if a specific proposal comes for some Central support, that would be considered. In Delhi why the Government is involved is, Delhi is the National Capital Region and also, some of the agencies like Delhi Development Authority are under the direct control of the Central Government. That being the case, we take interest. Otherwise, this has to be taken care of by the respective State Governments. Madam, I have sympathy for his problem in Saharanpur but at the same time, I cannot directly deal with that. APPENDIX XXII GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO. 1469 ANSWERED ON 04.03.2015 Housing Societies in Delhi 1469. SHRI RAJESHBHAI CHUDASAMA: DR. UDIT RAJ: Will the Minister of URBAN DEVELOPMENT be pleased to state: (a) The number of colonies developed by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA), location-wise; (b) the details of land allotted by Delhi Development Authority (DDA) to Group Housing Societies for construction of houses, location, measurement and society-wise; (c) the number of members in these societies at the time of allotment of land, society-wise; (d) the details of societies which have not constructed flats/houses on the allotted land and the reasons therefor; (e) whether the Government has cancelled the plots of any societies and if so, the details thereof; (f) the details of societies which have not been allotted land even after recommendation of Registrar, Cooperative Societies and the time by which the land is likely to be allotted; and (g) the details of housing societies declared black-listed? ANSWER THE MINISTER OF STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT (SHRI BABUL SUPRIYO): (a) & (b) Delhi Development Authority (DDA) has informed that as per their records, 934 Group Housing Societies have been developed by them in various locations. The list of societies along with their locations and measurements can be downloaded from the webpage https://dda.org.in/ddanew/ Publicnotices.aspx under the section titled "March 3rd" on that webpage. (c) The information is being collected. (d) DDA has informed that there are no instances of any societies which have not constructed flats/houses on land allotted to them.

165 166

(e) DDA has informed that allotment of 72 societies have been cancelled due to non-payment of the amount demanded by DDA. The list of these societies is available on the webpage referred to in reply to part (a) above. (f) DDA has informed that no proposal for allotment of land to Group Housing Societies is pending with them. (g) DDA has informed that they have not black-listed any Group Housing Society. APPENDIX XXIII GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO. 2369 ANSWERED ON 11.03.2015 Reconstruction of Bungalows 2369. DR. P. VENUGOPAL: Will the Minister of URBAN DEVELOPMENT be pleased to state: (a) whether the Government proposes to carry out a fresh survey to identify the bungalows in Lutyens Zone in New Delhi which need to be reconstructed expeditiously; (b) if so, the details thereof; (c) whether the Government proposes to raze and refurbish the entire lot of nearly 500 bungalows in Lutyens Zone in New Delhi; and (d) if so, the details thereof? ANSWER THE MINISTER OF STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT (SHRI BABUL SUPRIYO): (a) to (b) Yes, Madam. Ministry of Urban Development has asked CPWD to conduct fresh survey and to issue safety certificates for all the bungalows in Lutyens Bungalows Zone (LBZ). (c) & (d) Yes, Madam. Proposal for reconstruction of bungalows in LBZ, which have outlived their lives & are structurally unstable is under consideration.

167 APPENDIX XXIV GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO. 2489 ANSWERED ON 11.03.2015 Quota for Women in Urban Local Bodies 2489. SHRI B. VINOD KUMAR: DR. KAMBHAMPATI HARIBABU: SHRI ASADUDDIN OWAISI: SHRI MUTHAMSETTI SRINIVASA RAO (AVANTHI): Will the Minister of URBAN DEVELOPMENT be pleased to state: (a) whether the Government proposes 50 per cent reservation for women in urban local bodies and if so, the details thereof; (b) the details of States which have such provisions at present; (c) whether the Government has had any consultations with the States in this regard and if so, the details and response thereto; (d) the steps taken or being taken by the Government keeping in view the response of the States; and (e) the time by which a central legislation in this regard will be mooted? ANSWER THE MINISTER OF STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT (SHRI BABUL SUPRIYO): (a) Yes, Madam. The Government is considering a proposal for increasing representation of women in urban local bodies from the present 33 per cent to 50 per cent through an amendment to Article 243T of the Constitution of India. (b) to (e) Many States already have provision for 50 per cent reservation for women in Urban Local Bodies, which include Andhra Pradesh, Assam, Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha, Tripura and Telangana. One round of consultations have been undertaken with States and there is a broad consensus to the proposal. Further action would be taken as per the decision of the Cabinet.

168 APPENDIX XXV GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO. 3517 ANSWERED ON 18.03.2015 Winding up of Directorate of Printing 3517. SHRI RAMA KISHORE SINGH: Will the Minister of URBAN DEVELOPMENT be pleased to state: (a) whether the Government proposes to wind up the Directorate of Printing or transfer it to another department and close down the Government Press and if so, the details thereof and the reasons therefor; (b) if not, the details of the proposals, if any, to modernize the press and improve the functioning of the Directorate; (c) whether the Government has received any recommendations from any committee, in this regard and if so, the details thereof; (d) whether any study has been conducted on bringing down the expenses incurred on them; and (e) if so, the details thereof and the steps being taken by the Government in this regard? ANSWER THE MINISTER OF STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT (SHRI BABUL SUPRIYO): (a) No, Madam. There is no such proposal. (b) Government is considering the modernisation of Government of India Presses. However, the details of modernisation are yet to be worked out. (c) Government has not received any recommendation from any committee regarding winding up of Directorate of Printing. (d) No, Madam. (e) Does not arise in view of (d) above.

169 APPENDIX XXVI GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT LOK SABHA STARRED QUESTION NO. 403 ANSWERED ON 22.04.2015 Swachh Bharat Mission 403. SHRI SUKHBIR SINGH JAUNAPURIA: SHRI DUSHYANT SINGH: Will the Minister of URBAN DEVELOPMENT be pleased to state: (a) the objectives of the Swachh Bharat Mission and the strategy/ implementation framework developed including implementing agencies for the purpose; (b) whether the Government has set targets for various components of the Swachh Bharat Mission including the provision for household toilets, community toilets, public toilets and solid waste management; (c) if so, the details thereof including the achievements made during the financial year 2014-15, State and components-wise against targets so fixed; (d) the role of Panchayati Raj Institutions/Committees based organisation/ Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs)/Self Help Groups and Corporate bodies in the implementation of Swachh Bharat Mission; and (e) whether the Government proposes to constitute any committee for monitoring the utilization of funds under the Mission and if so, the details thereof? ANSWER THE MINISTER OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT (SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU): (a) to (e) A Statement is laid on the Table of the Lok Sabha. STATEMENT REFERRED TO IN REPLY TO LOK SABHA STARRED QUESTION NO. 403 FOR 22.4.2015 REGARDING SWACHH BHARAT MISSION (a) The Government of India has launched the Swachh Bharat Mission (SBM) on 2nd October, 2014, with a target to make the country clean by 2nd October, 2019. All 4041 statutory towns as per census 2011 have been considered under SBM. The objectives of the Mission are:— (i) Elimination of open defecation (ii) Eradication of Manual Scavenging (iii) Modern and Scientific Municipal Solid Waste Management

170 171

(iv) To effect behavioural change regarding healthy sanitation practices (v) Generate awareness about sanitation and its linkage with public health (vi) Capacity Augmentation for ULB's (vii) To create an enabling environment for private sector participation in Capex (capital expenditure) and Opex (operation and maintenance) The estimated cost of implementation of the Swachh Bharat Mission is Rs. 62,009 crore. The Government of India share amounts to Rs. 14,623 crore. The components for which Central financial assistance will be provided for SBM are as under:— (i) Household toilets (1.04 crore units) (@ Rs. 4000 per toilet as an incentive) (ii) Community toilets (max. 40% VGF/Grant), (iii) Solid Waste Management (max. 20% VGF/Grant) The components of the Mission shall be executed through the Urban Local Bodies. The distribution of Project funds across States/UTs is based on population of statutory towns and the number of statutory towns. (b) Yes, Madam. (c) the Government has set the following targets for the Urban Component of Swachh Bharat Mission:  Provision of household toilets — 1.04 Crore Units.  Provision of community toilets — 2.52 Lakh Seats.  Provision of public toilets — 2.56 Lakh Seats.  Solid waste Management—End to End waste collection, transportation, processing, recycling and disposal for all 4041 Statutory Towns. The progress reported by States for as of 23 March 2015 is as under:  Provision of household toilets — 2.79 Lakh units completed  Provision of community toilets (including Public Toilets) — 1222 Seats constructed  Solid waste Management—Collection and Transportation system put in place in 329 ULBs. 172

The State-wise and Component-wise achievements in FY 2014-15 are at Annexure-I. (d) As per Swachh Bharat Mission Guidelines, Committee based organizations, Non-Government Organisations, and Self Help Group have an important role in the implementation of SBM. They can be considered for active involvement in Information, Education and Communication (IEC) activities, triggering behavioural changes, generating demand and ensuring sustained use of sanitation facilities. In Capacity building they may assist the large and small ULBs through training and facilitating construction. The Corporate bodies can utilize their Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) funds alongwith their trained and motivated manpower for progressing the Mission objectives. Many Corporate have announced taking up sanitation activities and cleanliness drives, which they are co- ordinating with the local Governments. (e) Committees for Monitoring Utilisation of Funds:  National level: A National Advisory & Review Committee (NARC), headed by the Secretary, MoUD and comprising representatives of Ministries.  State level: State level High Powered Committee (HPC) for the Programme chaired by the State Chief Secretary, which would be steering the Programme.  District Level Review and Monitoring Committee (DLRMC): To fulfil the objective of ensuring satisfactory monitoring of projects under the chairmanship of local elected M.P.  Also, at ULB level, active participation of ward committees, Area Sabhas, NGOs etc. ANNEXURE I

Achievement (2014-15) Sl. State/UT Individual Community Solid Waste No Household & Public Management# Toilets Toilets Units Seats Towns 1. Andaman & Nicobar Islands 2. Andhra Pradesh 200 3. Arunachal Pradesh 4. Assam 5. Bihar 6. Chandigarh 7. Chhattisgarh 8. Dadra and Nagar Haveli 9. Daman and Diu 10. Delhi 80 3 11. Goa 45 14 12. Gujarat 165376 25 120 13. Haryana 14. Himachal Pradesh 15. Jammu and Kashmir 16. Jharkhand 17. Karnataka 4697 100 40 18. Kerala 19. Madhya Pradesh 99151 65 6 20. Maharashtra 21. Manipur 22. Meghalaya 23. Mizoram 10 24. Nagaland 4 1 25. Odisha 740 107 26. Puducherry 800 8 27. Punjab 28. Rajasthan 29. Sikkim 8 30. Tamil Nadu 10 31. Telangana 10 32. Tripura 33. Uttar Pradesh 34. Uttarakhand 35. West Bengal TOTAL 270069 1222 329 #. Collection and Transport components set up

173 174 Jh lq[kchj flag tkSukiqfj;k ¼Vksad&lokbZ ek/kksiqj½% egksn;k] jktLFkku esa fdrus 'kkSpky; cu jgs gSa blds tcko esa dksbZ mÙkj ugha gSA ge ns'k ds vanj 'kkSpky; cuk jgs gSa] tSlk ekuuh; izèkuea=h th us 15 vxLr] 2014 dks 'kkSpky; cukus ds fy, Hkk"k.k fn;k FkkA igys yksx bldk etkd mM+krs Fks fd D;k blh ls ns'k dks vkxs c<+kvksxs\ vkt vke vkneh Hkh le>us yxk gS fd 'kkSpky; cukus dk fdruk Qk;nk gS\ igys yksx fnYyh ds ckjs esa Hkh dgrs Fks fd iksY;w'ku Qzh gks tk,xk rks blls ns'k vkxs c<+ tk,xk\ igys yksx bl ckr dks mYVk le>rs Fks fd xkao esa 'kkSpky; cuok jgs gks] ysfdu vc yksx 'kkSpky; cukus dks ysdj izsfjr gSA blds lkFk&lkFk ge lcdh ,d leL;k gS fd xkao ds ljiap ds ikl dksbZ QaM ugha gSA ge tc xkao esa tkrs gSa] rks ns[krs gSa fd ogka ukfy;ka lM+ jgh gSa vkSj rkykc tks xkao ds chp esa gksrk gS] mlesa mu lc ukfy;ksa dk ikuh tkrk gSA esjk fuosnu gS fd bls ujsxk ls tksM+k tk;s ;k mlds fy, dksbZ vkSj izko/kku fd;k tk;sA ge tc Hkh xkao essa tkrs gSa] rks xkao dk ljiap lkaln ls lhlh jksM ekaxrk gS( D;ksafd ukfy;ksa esa xanxh Hkjh iM+h gSA blds lkFk&lkFk eSa ekuuh; ea=h th ls dguk pkgrk gwa fd ---¼O;o/kku½ ekuuh; v/;{k% vki viuk iz'u iwfN;sA Jh lq[kchj flag tkSukiqfj;k ¼Vksad&lokbZ ek/kksiqj½% eSa iz'u ij gh vk jgk gwaA blds fy, ge 12 gtkj #i;s ns jgs gSa] ysfdu tgka yksx dadjhyh ;k iFkjhyh tehu ij cls gq, gSa] ogka xM<+k gh ugha gks ldrk gSA esjk ekuuh; ea=h th ls dguk gS fd tgka Hkh ,slh txgsa gSa] ogka dqN izko/kku fd;k tk;s] jkf'k c<+kdj nh tk;sA esjk nwljk iz'u ;g gS---¼O;o/kku½ ekuuh; v/;{k% vki vHkh ,d gh iz'u iwfN,A mlds ckn vki nwljk lIyheSaVªh iz'u iwfN;sA vki ea=h th ls ;g iz'u iwfN;s fd D;k ,slh txg ds fy, vki jkf'k c<+k;saxs\ Jh ,eñ oSad¸;k uk;Mw% v/;{k egksn;] 2 vDVwcj] 2014] ;kuh xr lky vDVwcj esa LoPN Hkkjr vfHk;ku dh 'kq:vkr gqbZ gSA lc LVsV~l dks bl fo"k; ds ckjs essa crk;k x;k gS fd bldh ifjfè D;k gS] dk;ZØe D;k gS] lSaVj vkSj LVsV dk jksy D;k gS] 'kgjh fodkl ea=ky; esa vcZu yksdy ckWMh dk jksy D;k gS vkSj xzkeh.k fodkl ea=ky; esa iapk;r dk jksy D;k gSA bu fo"k;ksa esa FkksM+k lsfUlVkbt djds fQj ckn esa ogka ls iziksty vkus ds ckn gh dsUnz ljdkj viuh vksj ls iSlk fjyht djrh jgh gSA mldk C;kSjk vHkh gekjs ikl gSA jktLFkku dks fdruk iSlk fn;k x;k] ;g eSa lnL; egksn; dks crkuk pkgwaxkA LoPN Hkkjr fe'ku ds lanHkZ esa vHkh rd jktLFkku ljdkj dks 60 djksM+ 73 yk[k #i;k lsaVj us fjyht fd;k gSA eSa ;g ugha dg jgk fd ;g iSlk i;kZIr gSA blds lkFk&lkFk 'kgjh bykds esa baMhfotqvy Vk;ysV ds fy, 4 gtkj #i;s vkSj xzkeh.k bykds esa 12 gtkj #i;s fn;s tk;saxsA ;g 4 gtkj #i;s vkSj 12 gtkj #i;s Hkh i;kZIr ugha gSaA xzkeh.k bykds esa dqN T;knk Hkh gks ldrk gS] exj ftruk vkVk mruh jksVh gksxh] ;kuh gekjs ikl ftruk iSlk gS] ml fglkc ls gesa dke djuk iM+sxkA o"kZ 2019 rd gesa lc xkaoksa rd igqapuk gS] blfy, ljdkj us lkspk gS fd lks'ky fjLikSaflfcfyVh ds ukrs Lo;a lsod laxBuksa vkSj dkjiksjsV~l dks Hkh blds lkFk tksM+k tk;sA lnL; egksn; us bls egkRek xka/kh :jy bEiyk;eSaV xkjaVh Ldhe ds lkFk tksM+us dk lq>ko fn;k gSA eSa bl ckjs esa dUluZ foHkkx ls ppkZ d:axkA cgqr yksx ;g Hkh lq>ko ns jgs gSa fd bls d`f"k ds lkFk tksM+k tk;sA vc ;g u;k vkbfM;k vk;k gS fd LoPN Hkkjr fe'ku dks xzkeh.k fodkl ds lkFk tksM+k tk;s] rks bl ckjs esa ge /;ku nsaxsA 175 Jh lq[kchj flag tkSukiqfj;k ¼Vksad&lokbZ ek/kksiqj½% v/;{k egksn;k] fdlku vHkh rd dke esa twVk gqvk Fkk] ysfdu vHkh og [kkyh gSA esjs yksd lHkk {ks= Vksad&lokbZ ek/kksiqj esa ctV dk vHkko gS] blfy, ogka ctV dk izko/kku fd;k tk;s] rkfd yksx bl dke esa tqV ldsaA fdlku vHkh nks eghus [kkyh gSa] blfy, og blesa dke dj nsxkA blh ds lkFk&lkFk esjk ,d vkSj lq>ko gS fd tgka dgha Hkh cM+s 'kgj gSa] tks nl&chl xkaoksa dks tksM+rs gSa] muesa uxjikfydk u gksdj iapk;r gh gSA ge ogka tks lkoZtfud 'kkSpky; cukrs gSa] mlds fy, nks yk[k #i;s nsrs gSaA ml nks yk[k #i;s ls 'kkSpky; rks cu tkrk gS ysfdu mldh lkQ&lQkbZ] j[k&j[kko dk dksbZ izko/kku ugha gks ikrkA esjk ekuuh; ea=h th ls fuosnu gS fd mlds fy, dksbZ izko/kku fd;k tk;s] rkfd ge mldh jsxqyj lQkbZ dj ldsa vkSj vke vkneh mls ;wt dj ldsA Jh ,eñ oSad¸;k uk;Mw% v/;{k egksn;k] blesa FkksM+h izkWCye gS D;ksafd ljdkj ,d gS] exj foHkkx nks gSaA 'kgjh fodkl ea=ky; vyx gS vkSj xzkeh.k fodkl ea=ky; vyx gSA vc LoPN Hkkjr fe'ku 'kgjh fodkl ea=ky; Hkh pyk jgk gS vkSj xzkeh.k fodkl ea=ky; Hkh pyk jgk gSA ekuuh; lnL; us tks lq>ko fn;k gSA og mUgksaus xzkeh.k fodkl ds lanHkZ esa fn;k gSA lkewfgd 'kkSpky; dh O;oLFkk ds fy, ges tks nks yk[k #i;s fn;s tkrs gSa] esjs [;ky ls og lCLVsaf'k;y ,ekmaV gSA ogka dh LFkkuh; bdkbZ Hkh vius lk/ku mlds lkFk tksM+ ldrh gSA ekuuh; lnL; dsUnz ljdkj ls T;knk vekmaV dh fjDoSLV dj jgs gSa] rks tc foÙkh; fLFkfr esa o`f) gksxh] rks vkVksesfVdyh mlesa o`f) gksxhA LoPN Hkkjr fe'ku ,d izkW;fjVh Ldhe gS vkSj iz/kku ea=h th us [kqn ns'kokfl;ksa ls bl ckjs esa vihy Hkh dh gSA blesa ifCyd Hkh 'kkfey gks jgh gSA

v/;{k egksn;k] vkius ctV esa ns[kk gksxk fd 100 per cent deduction for contributions, other than by way of CSR contributions, to the Swachh Bharat Kosh. ;g Hkh ctV esa izksfotu fd;k gSA Clean Energy Cess increased from 100 to 200 per metric tonne of coal, etc. to finance clean environment initiatives. Excise duty on sacks and bags of polymers of Ethylene other than for industrial use increased from 12 per cent to 15 per cent.

There is an enabling provision to levy Swachh Bharat Cess at a rate of two per cent on certains services. That has not yet been decided, but there is such a proposal. The problem is, at the end of the day, vkidks Hkh vuqHko gS] lnL;ksa dks Hkh ekywe gS fd xzkeh.k bykdksa esa fdruh Hkh 'kkSpky; dh O;oLFkk dj nsa ysfdu ckn esa eSUVsusal esa leL;k vkrh gSA eSaus vius ftys esa ns[kk fd lc Ldwyksa esa Vk,ysV gSa ysfdu ikuh ogka rd ugha igqap ik jgk gS D;ksafd eSUVsusal dh rjQ /;ku ugha fn;k tk jgk gSA Maintenance of community toilets and public toilets have to be taken up by the local bodies, with the help of NGOs and others.;g dke dsUnz ls djuk vkSj ns[kuk laHko ugha gS] ge dsoy ;gka ls foÙkh; enn gh ns ldrs gSaA

SHRI DUSHYANT SINGH (JHALAWAR-BARAN): I would like to thank the hon. Prime Minister for introducing this visionary scheme to pursue sanitation in the country. I would like to also thank the hon. Urban Development Minister for taking up the implementation work. 176

There was a survey done by a Research Institute for Compassionate Economics last year called SQUAT. One of the findings of the survey was that the open defecation was not only a problem which was an infrastructure related one, but also a behavioural one. While construction of toilets is definitely a good thing, the larger question which remains is what is being done to maintain the cleanliness and the measures or proposals of the Government to change the behavioural pattern of people to use the toilets, and also to make the disposal of collected waste as a part of the scheme. Has the Ministry considered any plans to convert solid waste into energy as it has been done in western countries like Denmark? Jh ,eñ oSad¸;k uk;Mw% ekuuh; v/;{k th] ;gka ls ldqZyj ;k vkns'k nsus ls ekuo izo`fÙk ugha cnysxh] ;g lekt esa vos;jusl iSnk djus ls cnysxhA bl dk;ZØe esa tkx:drk iSnk djus dh Hkh ckr gSA Generating awareness about sanitation and its linkage with public health is very important. I would like to share with the hon. Members of the House that recently Mr. Bill Gates met me. When we were discussing, he said "Mr. Naidu, money is not the only issue. The real issue is the mindset." I agree with him. Over the years, open defecation is a part of our rural life. Now, slowly, people are realizing the effects and side-effects of the same. In those days, as a youth, I also used to go out for open defecation. At that time, it used to be the need; now, you cannot do that. So, one is about creating awareness; creating capacity augmentation for the urbal local bodies is also a part of the scheme; and affecting behavioural change regarding healthy sanitational practices. The Government of India is also going to fund NGOs and also the local bodies, urban as well as local, to create awareness and also to create capacity building. That is also a part of our funding scheme. The Government is doing that. With regard to the other issue of converting waste into energy and converting waste into compost, these are two favourite items that are being discussed across the globe and also across the country, but it is not that much easy, as I could find. I am in discussion with the Minister of Chemicals and Fertilizers. I am also in discussion with the Minister of Energy. We had two rounds of meetings on how to take it forward and then make it more popular in every urban local body. That is the need of the hour. The Government of India will be focussing more and more on these two aspects, that is, converting waste into energy and converting waste into compost. These two are also important components and we will be funding them. PROF. K.V. THOMAS (ERNAKULAM): Madam, the hon. Prime Minister has given thrust to two projects. They are (a) Swachh Bharat Abhiyan, and (b) Saansad Adarsh Gram Yojana. Very often, it has been stated that the PSUs and other organizations will give adequate assistance. Yesterday, I got a letter from the Human Resource Development Minister that three PSUs in my constituency, namely, Cochin Shipyard; Life Insurance Corporation; and Petronet, will give assistance for the Swachh Vidyalaya Abhiyan. 177

When I read the letter, I could not understand as to what this was because all these together would give assistance for 26 toilets whereas I need assistance for 2000 schools alone. In this way that we are going to implement the scheme? Name is not important because we had the Nirmal Gram Project. Many of my panchayats have got award for the Nirmal Gram Projects. Similar is the Saansad Adarsh Gram Scheme. My question to the Prime Minister of India is that serious efforts have to be made so that adequate funding is given to implement this programme. I would like to know whether the Prime Minister will give instructions so that this becomes a reality. He has mentioned the year 2019 for this Swachh Bharat Programme. Year and changing the name is not important. These projects have to be implemented and adequate financial assistance has to be given for this. Secondly, very often for the Central Government projects, Vigilance Committees under the MPs are being constituted. So, the MPs should also be taken into confidence and MPs should be given the responsibility. HON. SPEAKER: Are you giving the suggestion? PROF. K.V. THOMAS (ERNAKULAM): Yes. SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU: Hon. Speaker, I can understand the concern of the hon. Member. But this has not happened all of a sudden now. It is a challenge which we have inherited. All of us have to address that issue. With regard to public sector unit, public sector undertakings and the corporates also can spend up to two per cent of their profit for the purpose of CSR activity. Now creation of toilets also is allowed as a CSR activity under Swachh Bharat Programme. With regard to the specific thing about the PETRONET and the Cochin Shipyard and all that the hon. Member Prof. Thomas has mentioned, I will get in touch with those organizations. I do not think that financial assistance would be given to only 26 toilets. I am acknowledging what he had said. I will pursue with them and find out what exactly is the amount of support that they are going to give to that particular constituency. Secondly, I have already submitted to the House that the Prime Minister has taken it very seriously and taken it at the topmost level. The Prime Minister wanted this to become a people's movement rather than becoming a Government programme. but at the end of the day, you need resources. Whatever resources are available, the priority will be given to Swachh Bharat Programme. I have already said that one hundred per cent deduction for contributions to the Swachh Bharat kosh also has been initiated. There is good response coming to that also. The Clean Energy Cess is also being increased. Once you get this adequate revenues and resources, naturally the programme would get further push. I can also share with the house that yesterday we have taken another new initiative. What is happening is that people have functions in public places. Political parties have rallies in public places. Afterwards, the garbage is left behind. It becomes the duty of the local municipal body and also the Governmental agencies. This is a peculiar problem. Keeping that in mind, we have now taken a serious note of spoiling 178 of public places through littering of water bottles, left over food items, used packing material and wrappers etc. Now we have issued a Standard Operating Procedure to all the concerned by saying that they have to deposit Rs. 10,000 for a gathering up to 500 persons, Rs. 50,000 for 50,000 persons and Rs. 1,00,000 for a gathering above 50,000 persons. The money will be returned if the organizers are able to take up that responsibility of clean up the area. If the organizers do not do that, then this deposit money will be given to the local body or the people who are engaged in cleaning up the area so that the campus, the premises and the public places can be kept neat. We are also now making it mandatory for all the hotels, restaurants, marriage halls and farm houses to keep a particular number of dustbins depending on the capacity. Even the ordinary restaurants, hotels and marriage halls also are mandated to keep certain number of toilets. Even parks and gardens maintained by public authorities as well as private bodies have been given certain mandate. I told you in the beginning itself that mere Governmental effort alone will not suffice. Public also have to join this; the local bodies have to join this. We are trying to create awareness. Whatever support is possible and whatever additional resources will come, the Government will definitely give more priority to Swachch Bharat and particularly to toilets. I can assure the hon. Member that many organisations are coming forward. Rotary Governors who met recently have said that per year they will take up construction of 10,000 toilets. Similarly some other organisations are also coming forward, I request the Members of Parliament also to (1) approach the local service organisations, (2) contact the public sector undertakings, (3) contact the Private factories also because they also have been mandated, and we can liaison also. Shortly I am going to call a meeting of all the corporates with me and the Rural Development Minister to identify what is their area of interest, and then entrust it to the concerned local body so that we act as a platform to take care of their concerns. Madam, Thomas ji is a very senior person and he has got good knowledge. There is every need for involvement of Members of Parliament also in overseeing the implementation of Swachh Bharat Mission in their respective Constituencies. I will be working out a mechanism shortly. In addition to the Collector, I plan to make the Member of Parliament also the Co-Chairman of the Monitoring Committee...... (Interruptions) PROF K.V. THOMAS (ERNAKULAM): We cannot be Co-Chairmen...... (Interruptions) SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU: Four people need not stand, I can understand through one man. So, your concern is that Chairman has to be a Member of Parliament. I shall keep it in mind. PROF. SAUGATA ROY (DUM DUM): Madam Speaker, the Swachh Bharat Mission was launched by the Prime Minister with much fanfare on 2nd October, 2014, No doubt it is a good programme though it is a continuation of the Nirmal Gram Yojana in the urban areas. What I have discovered is that in spite of all the 179 fanfare and the good publicity that was created, achievement is very little. As compared to a target of 1.04 crore toilets, only 2.7 lakh units have been constructed. My specific question to the Urban Development Minister is as follows. In Nirmal Gram Yojana we found that in spite of providing one concrete slab for a toilet, the dirt did not go away. In recent times, bio-toilets have been developed where bacteria are used to dissolve the faecal matter. As the Urban Development Minister mentioned, water is a major problem. In normal toilets you need a lot of water which is not available in many areas. I have installed many bio-toilets in my Constituency. Normally it costs between Rs. 20,000 to Rs. 25,000 for a bio-toilets. DRDO has developed a model. I would like the ask the Urban Development Minister whether he would, instead of just giving Rs. 4,000 for a toilet which is insufficient, encourage the use of bio-toilets so that bacteria and scientific methods can be used to dissolve the faecal matter and provide a real Swachh Bharat instead of dirty toilets which have no water supply. SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU: Madam Speaker, it is a very good suggestion. I would like to assure the hon. Member Saugata Roy ji-DRDO had made a presentation on these bio-toilets and I myself have seen it - that we have commended it to certain urban local bodies and certain urban local bodies including NDMC in Delhi have started using it also and they have found it to be more useful. So, we will be commending it to the local bodies across the country because that will take care of the other side of this issue and the bacteria etc. , also will be useful. DRDO has developed bio toilets. Hindustan Prefab also has developed it. NBCC have also come forward for the construction of these bio-toilets. Swachh Bharat Mission will be encouraging these bio-toilets in all the States. PROF. SAUGATA ROY (DUM-DUM): You can issue a circular to the States asking them to go in for bio-toilets. SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU: We will definitely issue a circular. As the hon. Member has said, we started in October and now by March only 2.79 lakh units of household toilets were completed. The number of community toilets also is only 1022. It needs further push. At the end of the day, as I told you, we can give money but it has to be executed by the States and urban local bodies. I am not trying to pass on the responsibility. We are persuading them from time to time and as I assured, we will be sending this advice also with regard to usage of bio-toilets. ------¼O;o/kku½ ekuuh; v/;{k% vki bl fo"k; ij ppkZ ekafx,] ppkZ ns nsaxsA Jh vfHk"ksd flag% ¼jktuanxkao½% v/;{kk th] LoPN Hkkjr vfHk;ku ,d csgn laosnu'khy fo"k; gSA tc Hkh LoPN Hkkjr vfHk;ku ds fo"k; esa ppkZ gksrh gS] ge lkekU;r% ns[krs gSa fd iSlk dgka ls vk,xk] esuVsusal dSls gksxh vkSj bu fo"k;ksa ij ppkZ gksrh gSA eSa NÙkhlx<+ ls vkrk gwa vkSj esjs 180 lalnh; {ks= jktuanxkao ftys esa yxHkx lkS xkao ,sls gSa ftUgksaus Lo;a ds iz;kl ls iwjs xkao ds gj ?kj esa 'kkSpky; dk fuekZ.k fd;k gS vkSj blesa ljdkjh lgk;rk ugha yh gSA egksn;k] eSa vkids ek/;e ls ljdkj ls tkuuk pkgrk gwa fd ,sls ldkjkRed iz;klksa dk vkSj O;kihdj.k dSls gks ldrk gS\ ,sls xzkeh.kksa dks ge dSls iqjLd`r dj ldrs gSa\ gesa ;g Hkh le>us dh t:jr gS fd iSlksa ds vykok vfHk;ku dh lQyrk bl ckr ij fuHkZj djrh gS fd ns'k dk gj O;fDr bl vfHk;ku dks] bl lksp dks vkRelkr djds vius&vius ifjos'k esa ldkjkRed cnyko dSls yk ldrk gSA eSa ekuuh; ea=h th ls tkuuk pkgrk gwa fd ge bl vfHk;ku dks rFkk ,sls ldkjkRed iz;klksa dks dSls yksd O;kihdj.k dh rjQ ys tk ldrs gSa\

SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU: Hon. Speaker Madam, we can make it people's movement only by the participation of the people. That is why we have got in touch with the icons in various walks of public life, lot of people from cinema, from the industry, from sports etc. They have come forward to lend their names to create awareness among the people. Icons from religious and spiritual field have been contacted and they are also willing to support this programme. Some of them have already joined this programme. This is a continuous process. If the hon. Members have got any good ideas, they are welcome. We will take them into consideration. APPENDIX XXVII GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT LOK SABHA STARRED QUESTION NO.403 ANSWERED ON 22.04.2015 Swachh Bharat Mission *403. SHRI SUKHBIR SINGH JAUNAPURIA: SHRI DUSHYANT SINGH: Will the Minister of URBAN DEVELOPMENT be pleased to state: (a) the objectives of the Swachh Bharat Mission and the strategy/ implementation framework developed including implementing agencies for the purpose; (b) whether the Government has set targets for various components of the Swachh Bharat Mission including the provision for household toilets, community toilets, public toilets and solid waste management; (c) if so, the details thereof including the achievements made during the financial year 2014-15, State and components-wise against targets so fixed; (d) the role of Panchayati Raj Institutions/Committees based organisation/ Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs)/Self Help Groups and Corporate bodies in the implementation of Swachh Bharat Mission; and (e) whether the Government proposes to constitute any committees for monitoring the utilization of funds under the Mission and if so, the details thereof? ANSWER THE MINISTER OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT (SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU): (a) to (e) A Statement is laid on the Table of the Sabha. STATEMENT REFERRED TO IN REPLY TO LOK SABHA STARRED QUESTION NO. 403 FOR 22.4.2015 REGARDING SWACHH BHARAT MISSION (a) The Government of India has launched the Swachh Bharat Mission (SBM) on 2nd October, 2014, with a target to make the country clean by 2nd October, 2019. All 4041 statutory towns as per census 2011 have been considered under SBM. The objectives of the Mission are:— (i) Elimination of open defecation (ii) Eradication of Manual Scavenging (iii) Modern and Scientific Municipal Solid Waste Management

181 182

(iv) To effect behavioural change regarding health sanitation practices (v) Generate awareness about sanitation and its linkage with public health (vi) Capacity Augmentation for ULB's (vii) To create an enabling environment for private sector participation in Capex (capital expenditure) and Opex (operation and maintenance) The estimated cost of implementation of the Swachh Bharat Mission is Rs. 62,009 crore. The Government of India share amounts to Rs. 14,623 crore. The components for which Central financial assistance will be provided for SBM are as under:— (i) Household toilets (1.04 crore units) @ Rs. 4000 per toilet as an incentive) (ii) Community toilets (max 40% VGF/Grant) (iii) Soild Waste Management (max 20% VGF/Grant) The components of the Mission shall be executed through the Urban Local Bodies. The distribution of Project funds across States/UTs is based on population of statutory towns and the number of statutory towns. (b) Yes, Madam. (c) The Government has set the following targets for the Urban Component of Swachh Bharat Mission:  Provision of household toilets-1.04 Crore Units.  Provision of community toilets 2.52 Lakh Seats.  Provision of public toilets 2.56 Lakh Seats.  Solid Waste Management—End to End waste collection, transportation, processing, recycling and disposal for all 4041 Statutory Towns. The progress reported by States for as of 23 March 2015 is as under.  Provision of household toilets 2.79 Lakh units completed  Provision of community toilets (including Public Toilets) — 1222 Seats constructed  Solid Waste Management—Collection and Transportation system put in place in 329 ULBs. 183

The State-wise and component-wise achievements in FY 2014-15 are at Annexure-I. (d) As per Swachh Bharat Mission Guidelines, Committee based organizations, Non-Government Organizations, and Self Help Groups have an important role in the implementation of SBM. They can be considered for active involvement in Information, Education and Communication (IEC) activities, triggering behavioural changes, generating demand and ensuring sustained use of sanitation facilities. In Capacity building they may assist the large and small ULBs through training and facilitating construction. The Corporate bodies can utilize their Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) funds along with their trained and motivated manpower for progressing the Mission objectives. Many Corporate have announced taking up sanitation activities and cleanliness drives, which they are coordinating with the local Governments. (e) Committees for Monitoring utilisation of Funds:  National level: A National Advisory & Review Committee (NARC), headed by the Secretary, MoUD and comprising representatives of Ministries.  State level: State level High Powered Committee (HPC) for the Programme chaired by the State Chief Secretary, which would be steering the Programme.  District Level Review and Monitoring Committee (DLRMC): To fulfil the objective of ensuring satisfactory monitoring of projects under the chairmanship of local elected M.P.  Also, at ULB level, active participation of ward committees, Area Sabhas, NGOs etc. ANNEXURE I Achievement (2014-15) Sl. States/UTs Individual Community Solid Waste No. Household & Public Management# Toilets Toilets Units Seats Towns 1. Andaman & Nicobar Islands 2. Andhra Pradesh 200 3. Arunachal Pradesh 4. Assam 5. Bihar 6. Chandigarh 7. Chhattisgarh 8. Dadra and Nagar Haveli 9. Daman and Diu 10. Delhi 80 3 11. Goa 45 14 12. Gujarat 165376 25 120 13. Haryana 14. Himachal Pradesh 15. Jammu and Kashmir 16. Jharkhand 17. Karnataka 4697 100 40 18. Kerala 19. Madhya Pradesh 99151 65 6 20. Maharashtra 21. Manipur 22. Meghalaya 23. Mizoram 10 24. Nagaland 4 1 25. Odisha 740 107 26. Puducherry 800 8 27. Punjab 28. Rajasthan 29. Sikkim 8 30. Tamil Nadu 10 31. Telangana 10 32. Tripura 33. Uttar Pradesh 34. Uttarakhand 35. West Bengal

TOTAL 270069 1222 329

# Collection and Transport components set up.

184 185 ¼iz'u 403½ Jh lq[kchj flag tkSukiqfj;k ¼Vk—d lokbZ ekèksiqj½% egksn;k] jktLFkku esa fdrus 'kkSpky; cu jgs g® bldk tcko esa dksbZ mÙkj ugha gSA ge ns'k ds vanj 'kkSpky; cuk jgs g®] tSlk ekuuh; izèkuea=h th us 15 vxLr] 2014 dks 'kkSpky; cukus ds fy, Hkk"k.k fn;k FkkA igys yksx bldk etkd mM+krs Fks fd D;k blh ls ns'k dks vkxs c<+kvksxs\ vkt vke vkneh Hkh le>us yxk gS fd 'kkSpky; cukus dk fdruk Qk;nk gS\ igys yksx fnYyh ds ckjs esa Hkh dgrs Fks fd iksY;w'ku Qzh gks tk,xk rks blls ns'k vkxs c<+ tk,xk\ igys yksx bl ckr dks mYVk le>rs Fks fd xkao esa 'kkSpky; cuok jgs gks] ysfdu vc yksx 'kkSpky; cukus dks ysdj izsfjr gSA blds lkFk&lkFk ge lcdh ,d leL;k gS fd xkao ds ljiap ds ikl dksbZ QaM ugha gSA ge tc xkao esa tkrs g®] rks ns[krs g® fd ogka ukfy;ka lM+ jgh g® vkSj rkykc tks xkao ds chp esa gksrk gS] mlesa mu lc ukfy;ksa dk ikuh tkrk gSA esjk fuosnu gS fd bls ujsxk ls tksM+k tk;s ;k mlds fy, dksbZ vkSj izkoèku fd;k tk;sA ge tc Hkh xkao esa tkrs g®] rks xkao dk ljiap lkaln ls lhlh jksM ekaxrk gS( D;ksafd ukfy;ksa esa xanxh Hkjh iM+h gSA blds lkFk&lkFk e® ekuuh; ea=h th ls dguk pkgrk gwa fd -----¼O;oèku½ ekuuh; v/;{k% vki viuk iz'u iwfN;sA Jh lq[kchj flag tkSukiqfj;k ¼Vk—d lokbZ ekèksiqj½% e® iz'u ij gh vk jgk gwaA blds fy, ge 12 gtkj #i;s ns jgs g®] ysfdu tgka yksx dadjhyh ;k iFkjhyh tehu ij cls gq, g®] ogka xM<+k gh ugha gks ldrkA esjk ekuuh; ea=h th ls dguk gS fd tgka Hkh ,slh txgsa g®] ogka dqN izkoèku fd;k tk;s] jkf'k c<+kdj nh tk;sA esjk nwljk iz'u ;g gS---¼O;oèku½ ekuuh; v/;{k% vki vHkh ,d gh iz'u iwfN;sA mlds ckn vki nwljk lIyhe®Vªh iz'u iwfN;sA vki ea=h th ls ;g iz'u iwfN;s fd D;k ,slh txg ds fy, vki jkf'k c<+k;saxs\ Jh ,eñ o®dS¸;k uk;Mw% v/;{k egksn;] 2 vDrwcj] 2014] ;kuh xr lky vDrwcj esa LoPN Hkkjr vfHk;ku dh 'kq:vkr gqbZ gSA lc LVsV~l dks bl fo"k; ds ckjs esa crk;k x;k gS fd bldh ifjfè D;k gS] dk;ZØe D;k gS] l®Vj vkSj LVsV dk jksy D;k gS] 'kgjh fodkl ea=ky; esa vcZu yksdy ckWMh dk jksy D;k gS vkSj xzkeh.k fodkl ea=ky; esa iapk;r dk jksy D;k gSA bu fo"k;ksa esa FkksM+k lsfUlVkbt djds fQj ckn esa ogka ls iziksty vkus ds ckn gh dsUnz ljdkj viuh vksj ls iSlk fjyht djrh jgh gSA mldk C;kSjk vHkh gekjs ikl gSA jktLFkku dks fdruk iSlk fn;k x;k] ;g e® lnL; egksn; dks crkuk pkgwaxkA LoPN Hkkjr fe'ku ds lanHkZ esa vHkh rd jktLFkku ljdkj dk 60 djksM+ 73 yk[k #i;k l®Vj us fjyht fd;k gSA e® ;g ugha dg jgk fd ;g iSlk i;kZIr gSA blds lkFk&lkFk 'kgjh bykds es baMhfotqvy VkW;ysV ds fy, 4 gtkj #i;s vkSj xzkeh.k bykds esa 12 gtkj #i;s fn;s tk;saxsA ;g 4 gtkj #i;s vkSj 12 gtkj #i;s Hkh i;kZIr ugha g®A xzkeh.k bykds esa dqN T;knk Hkh gks ldrk gS] exj ftruk vkVk mruh jksVh gksxh] ;kuh gekjs ikl ftruk iSlk gS] ml fglkc ls gesa dke djuk iM+sxkA o"kZ 2019 rd gesa lc xkaoksa rd igqapuk gS( blfy, ljdkj us lkspk gS fd lks'ky fjLik®flfcfyVh ds ukrs Lo;a lsod laxBuksa vkSj dkWjiksjsV~l dks Hkh blds lkFk tksM+k tk;sA lnL; egksn; us bls egkRek xkaèh :jy bEIyk;esaV xkjaVh Ldhe ds lkFk tksM+us dk lq>ko fn;k gSA e® bl ckjs esa dUluZ foHkkx ls ppkZ d:axkA cgqr yksx ;g Hkh lq>ko ns jgs g® fd bls 186 d`f"k ds lkFk tksM+k tk;sA vc ;g u;k vkbfM;k vk;k gS fd LoPN Hkkjr fe'ku dks xzkeh.k fodkl ds lkFk tksM+k tk;s] rks bl ckjs es ge /;ku nsaxsA Jh lq[kchj flag tkSukiqfj;k ¼Vk—d lokbZ ekèksiqj½% v/;{k egksn;k] fdlku vHkh rd dke esa tqVk gqvk Fkk] ysfdu vHkh og [kkyh gSA esjs yksd lHkk {ks= Vk—d&lokbZ ekèksiqj esa ctV dk vHkko gS] blfy, ogka ctV dk izkoèku fd;k tk;s] rkfd yksx bl dke esa tqV ldsaA fdlku vHkh nks eghus [kkyh gS] blfy, og blesa dke dj nsxkA blh ds lkFk&lkFk esjk ,d vkSj lq>ko gS fd tgka dgha Hkh cM+s 'kgj g®] tks nl&chl xkaoksa dks tksM+rs g®] muesa uxjikfydk u gksdj iapk;r gh gSA ge ogka tks lkoZtfud 'kkSpky; cukrs g®] mlds fy, nks yk[k #i;s nsrs g®A ml nks yk[k #i;s ls 'kkSpky; rks cu tkrk gS ysfdu mldh lkQ&lQkbZ] j[k&j[kko dk dksbZ izkoèku ugha gks ikrkA esjk ekuuh; ea=h th ls fuosnu gS fd mlds fy, dksbZ izkoèku fd;k tk;s] rkfd ge mldh jsxqyj lQkbZ dj ldsa vkSj vke vkneh mls ;wt dj ldsA Jh ,eñ o®dS¸;k uk;Mw% v/;{k egksn;k] blesa FkksM+h izkWCye gS D;kssafd ljdkj ,d gS] exj foHkkx nks g®A 'kgjh fodkl ea=ky; vyx gS vkSj xzkeh.k fodkl ea=ky; vyx gSA vc LoPN Hkkjr fe'ku 'kgjh fodkl ea=ky; Hkh pyk jgk gS vkSj xzkeh.k fodkl ea=ky; Hkh pyk jgk gSA ekuuh; lnL; us tks lq>ko fn;k gS] og mUgksaus xzkeh.k fodkl ds lanHkZ esa fn;k gSA lkewfgd 'kkSpky; dh O;oLFkk ds fy, ge tks nks yk[k #i;s fn;s tkrs g®] esjs [;ky ls og lCLVsaf'k;y ,ekmaV gSA ogka dh LFkkuh; bdkbZ Hkh vius lkèu mlds lkFk tksM+ ldrh gSA ekuuh; lnL; dsUnz ljdkj ls T;knk vekmaV dh fjDoSLV dj jgs gS] rks tc foÙkh; fLFkfr esa o`f) gksaxh] rks vkVksesfVdyh mlesa o`f) gksxhA LoPN Hkkjr fe'ku ,d izkW;fjVh Ldhe gS vkSj izèku ea=h th us [kqn ns'kokfl;ksa ls bl ckjs esa vihy Hkh dh gS A blesa ifCyd Hkh 'kkfey gks jgh gSA

v/;{k egksn;k] vkius ctV esa ns[kk gksxk fd 100 per cent deduction for contributions, other than by way of CSR contributions, to the Swachh Bharat Kosh ;g Hkh ctV esa izksfotu fd;k gSA Clean Energy Cess increased from 100 to 200 per metric tonne of coal, etc. to finance clean environment initiatives. Excise duty on sacks and bags of polymers of Ethylene other than for industrial use increased from 12 per cent to 15 per cent. There is an enabling provision to levy Swachh Bharat Cess at a rate of two per cent on certain services. That has not yet been decided, but there is such a proposal. The problem is, at the end of the day, vkidks Hkh vuqHko gS] lnL;ksa dks Hkh ekywe gS fd xzkeh.k bykdksa esa fdruh Hkh 'kkSpky; dh O;oLFkk dj nsa ysfdu ckn esa eSUVsusal esa leL;k vkrh gSA e®us vius ftys esa ns[kk fd lc Ldwyksa esa VkW,ysV g® ysfdu ikuh ogka rd ugha igqap ik jgk gS D;ksafd eSUVsusal dh rjQ /;ku ugha fn;k tk jgk gSA Maintenance of community toilets and public toilets have to be taken up by the local bodies, with the help of NGOs and others. ;g dke dsanz ls djuk vkSj ns[kuk laHko ugha gS] ge dsoy ;gka ls foÙkh; enn gh ns ldrs g®A

SHRI DUSHYANT SINGH (JHALAWAR-BARAN): I would like to thank the hon. Prime Minister for introducing this visionary scheme to pursue sanitation in 187 the country. I would like to also thank the hon. Urban Development Minister for taking up the implementation work. There was a survey done by a Research Institute for Compassionate Economics last year called SQUAT. One of the findings of the survey was that the open defecation was not only a problem which was an infrastrcture related one, but also a behavioural one. While construction of toilets is definitely a good thing, the larger question which remains is what is being done to maintain the cleanliness and the measures or proposals of the Government to change the behavioural pattern of people to use the toilets, and also to make the disposal of collected waste as a part of the scheme. Has the Ministry considered any plans to convert solid waste into energy as it has been done in western countries like Denmark? Jh ,eñ o®dS¸;k uk;Mw% ekuuh; v/;{k th] ;gka ls ldqZyj ;k vkns'k nsus ls ekuo izo`fÙk ugha cnysxh] ;g lekt es vos;jusl iSnk djus ls cnysxhA bl dk;ZØe esa tkx:drk iSnk djus dh Hkh ckr gSA Generating awareness about sanitation and its linkage with public health is very important. I would like to share with the hon: Members of the House that recently. Mr. Bill Gate met me. When we were discussing, he said "Mr. Naidu, money is not the only issue. The real issue is the mindset". I agree with him. Over the years, open defecation is a part of our rural life. Now, slowly, people are realizing the effects and side-effects of the same. In those days, as a youth, I also use to go out for open defecation. At that time, it use to be the need; now, you cannot do that. So one is about creating awareness; creating capacity augmentation for the urban local bodies is also a part of the scheme; and affecting behavioural change regarding healthy sanitation practices. The Government of India is also going to fund NGOs and also the local bodies, urban as well as local, to create awareness and also to create capacity building. That is also a part of our funding scheme. The Government is doing that. With regard to the other issue of converting waste into energy and converting waste into compost, these are two favourite items that are being discussed across the globe and also across the country, but it is not that much easy, as I could find. I am in discussion with the Minister of Chemicals and Fertilizers. I am also in discussion with the Minister of Energy. We had two rounds of meetings on how to take it forward and then make it more popular in every urban local body. That is the need of the hour. The Government of India will be focussing more and more on these two aspects, that is, converting waste into energy and converting waste into compost. These two are also important components and we will be funding them. PROF. K.V. THOMAS (ERNAKULAM): Madam, the hon. Prime Minister has given thrust to two projects. They are (a) Swachh Bharat Abhiyan; and (b) Sansad Adarsh Gram Yojana. Very often, it has been stated that the PSUs and other organizations will give adequate assistance. Yesterday, I got a letter from the Human Resource Development Minister that three PSUs in my constituency, namely, Cochin Shipyard; Life Insurance Corporation; and Petronet, will give assistance for the Swachh Vidyalaya Abhiyan. 188

When I read the letter, I could not undertand as to what this was because all these together would give assistance for 26 toilets whereas I need assistance for 2000 schools alone. Is this the way that we are going to implement the scheme? Name is not important because we had the Nirmal Gram Project. Many of my panchayats have got award for the Nirmal Gram Project. Similar is the Sansad Adharsh Gram Scheme. My question to the Prime Minister of India is that serious efforts have to be made so that adequate funding is given to implement this programme. I would like to know whether the Prime Minister will give instructions so that this becomes a reality. He has mentioned the year 2019 for this Swachh Bharat Programme. Year and changing the name is not important. These projects have to be implemented and adequate financial assistance has to be given for this. Secondly, very often for the Central Government projects, Vigilance Committee under the MPs are being constituted. So, the MPs should also be taken into confidence and MPs should be given the responsibility. HON. SPEAKER: Are you giving the suggestion? PROF. K.V. THOMAS (ERNAKULAM): Yes. SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU: Hon. Speaker, I can understand the concern of the hon. Member. But this has not happened all of a sudden now. It is a challenge which we have inherited. All of us have to address that issue. With regard to public sector unit, public sector undertakings and the corporates also can spend up to two per cent of their profits for the purpose of CSR activity. Now creation of toilets also is allowed as a CSR activity under the Swachh Bharat Programme. With regard to the specific thing about the PETRONET and the Cochin Shipyard and all that the hon. Member Prof. Thomas has mentioned, I will get in touch with those organizations. I do not think that financial assistance would be given to only 26 toilets. I am acknowledging what he has said. I will pursue with them and find out what exactly is the amount of support that they are going to give to that particular constituency. Secondly, I have already submitted to the House that the Prime Minister has taken it very seriously and taken it at the topmost level. The Prime Minister wanted this to become a people's movement rather than becoming a Government programme. But at the end of the day, you need resources. Whatever resources are available, the priority will be given to Swachh Bharat Programme. I have already said that one hundred per cent deduction for contributions to the Swachh Bharat Kosh also has been initiated. There is good response coming to that also. The Clean Energy Cess is also being increased. Once you get this adequate revenues and resources, naturally the programme would get further push. I can also share with the House that yesterday we have taken another new initiative. What is happening is that people have functions in public places. Political parties have rallies in public places. Afterwards, the garbage is left behind. It becomes the duty of the local municipal body and also the Governmental agencies. This is a peculiar problem. Keeping that in mind, we have now taken a serious note of spoiling 189 of public places through littering of water bottles, left over food items, used packing material and wrappers etc. Now we have issued a Standard Operating Procedure to all the concerned by saying that they have to deposit Rs. 10,000 for a gathering up to 500 persons, Rs. 50,000 for 50,000 persons and Rs. 1,00,000 for a gathering above 50,000 persons. The money will be returned if the organizers are able to take up that responsibility of clean up the area. If the organizers do not do that, then this deposit money will be givern to the local body or the people who are engaged in cleaning up the area so that the campus, the premises and the public places can be kept neat. We are also now making it mandatory for all the hotels, restaurants, marriage halls and farms houses to keep a particular number of dustbins depending on the capacity. Even the ordinary restaurants, hotels and marriage halls also are mandated to keep certain number of toilets. Even parks and gardens maintained by public authorities as well as private bodies have been givern certain mandate. I told you in the beginning itself that mere Governmental effort alone will not suffice. Public also have to join this; the local bodies have to join this. We are trying to create awareness. Whatever support is possible and whatever additional resources will come, the Government will definitely give more priority to Swachh Bharat and particularly to toilets. I can assure the hon. Member that many organisations are coming forward. Rotary Governors who met recently have said that per year they will take up construction of 10,000 toilets. Similarly some other organisations are also coming forward. I request the Members of Parliament also of (1) approach the local service organisations, (2) contact the public sector undertakings, (3) contact the private factories also because they also have been mandated, and we can liaison also. Shortly I am going to call a meeting of all the the corporates with me and the Rural Development Minister to identify what is their area of interest and then entrust it to the concerned local body so that we act as a platform to take care of their concerns. Madam, Thomasji is a very senior person and he has got good knowledge. There is every need for involvement of Members of Parliament also in overseeing the implementation of Swachh Bharat Mission in their respective Constituencies. I will be working out a mechanism shortly. In addition to the Collector, I plan to make the Member of Parliament also the Co-Chairman of the Monitoring Committee.....(Interruptions). PROF. K.V. THOMAS (ERNAKULAM): We cannot be Co-Chairmen...... (Interruptions). SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU: Four people need not stand, I can understand through one man. So, your concern is that Chairman has to be a Member of Parliament, I shall keep it in mind. PROF. SAUGATA ROY (DUM DUM): Madam Speaker, the Swachh Bharat Mission was launched by the Prime Minister with much fanfare on 2nd October, 2014. No doubt it is a good programme through it is a continuation of the Nirmal Gram Yojana in the urban areas. What I have discovered is that in spite of all the fanfare and the good publicity that was created, achievement is very little. As 190 compared to a target of 1.04 crore toilets, only 2.7 lakh units have been constructed. My specific question to the Urban Development Minister is as follows. In Nirmal Gram Yojana we found that in spite of providing one concrete slab for a toilet, the dirt did not go away. In recent times, bio-toilets have been developed where bacteria are used to dissolve the faecal matter. As the Urban Development Minister mentioned, water is a major problem. In normal toilets you need a lot of water which is not available in many areas. I have installed many bio-toilets in my Constituency. Normally it costs between Rs. 20,000 to Rs. 25,000 for a bio-toilet DRDO has developed a model. I would like to ask the Urban Development Minister whether he would, instead of just giving Rs. 4,000 for a toilet which is insufficient, encourage the use of bio-toilets so that bacteria and scientific methods can be used to dissolve the faecal matter and provide a real Swachh Bharat instead of duty toilets which have no water supply. SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU: Madam Speaker, it is a very good suggestion. I would like to assure the hon Member Saugata Royji-DRDO had made a presentation on these bio-toilets and I myself have seen it—that we have commended it to certain urban local bodies and certain urban local bodies including NDMC in Delhi have started using it also and they have found it to be more useful. So, we will be commending it to the local bodies across the country because that will take care of the other side of this issue and the bacteria etc., also will be useful. DRDO had developed bio-toilets. Hindustan Prefab also has developed it. NBCC have also come forward for the construction of these bio-toilets. Swachh Bharat Mission will be encouraging these bio-toilets in all the States. PROF. SAUGATA ROY (DUM DUM): You can issue a circular to the States asking them to go in for bio-toilets. SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU: We will definitely issue a circular. As the hon. Member has said, we started in October and now by March only 2.79 lakh units of household toilets were completed. The number of community toilets also a only 1022. It needs further push. At the end of the day, as I told you, we can give money but it has to be executed by the States and urban local bodies. I am not trying to pass on the responsibility. We are persuading them from time to time and as I assured, we will be sending this advice also with regard to usage of bio-toilets. ------¼O;o/kku½ ekuuh; v/;{k% vki bl fo"k; ij ppkZ ekafx,] ppkZ ns nsaxsA Jh vfHk"ksd ¯lg ¼jktuanxkao½% v/;{kk th] LoPN Hkkjr vfHk;ku ,d csgn laosnu'khy fo"k; gSA tc Hkh LoPN Hkkjr vfHk;ku ds fo"k; esa ppkZ gksrh gS] ge lkekU;r% ns[krs gSa fd iSlk dgka ls vk,xk] esuVsusal dSls gksxh vkSj bu fo"k;ksa ij ppkZ gksrh gSA eSa NÙkhlx<+ ls vkrk gwa vkSj esjs lalnh; {ks= jktuanxkao ftys esa yxHkx lkS xkao ,sls gSa ftUgksaus Lo;a ds iz;kl ls iwjs xkao ds gj ?kj esa 'kkSpky; dk fuekZ.k fd;k gS vkSj blesa ljdkjh lgk;rk ugha yh gSA 191 egksn;k] eSa vkids ek/;e ls ljdkj ls tkuuk pkgrk gwa fd ,sls ldkjkRed iz;klksa dk vkSj O;kihdj.k dSls gks ldrk gS\ ,sls xzkeh.kksa dks ge dSls iqjLd`r dj ldrs gSa\ gesa ;g Hkh le>us dh t:jr gS fd iSlksa ds vykok vfHk;ku dh lQyrk bl ckr ij fuHkZj djrh gS fd ns'k dk gj O;fDr bl vfHk;ku dks] bl lksp dks vkRelkr djds vius&vius ifjos'k esa ldkjkRed cnyko dSls yk ldrk gSA eSa ekuuh; ea=h th ls tkuuk pkgrk gwa fd ge bl vfHk;ku dks rFkk ,sls ldkjkRed iz;klksa dks dSls yksd O;kihdj.k dh rjQ ys tk ldrs gSa\

SHRI M. VENKAIAH NAIDU: Hon. Speaker Madam, we can make it people's movement only by the participation of the people. That is why we have got in touch with the icons in various walks of public life, lot of people from cinema, from the industry, from sports etc. They have come forward to lend their names to create awareness among the people. Icons from religious and spiritual field have been contacted and they are also willing to support this programme. Some of them have already joined this programme. This is a continuous process. If the hon. Members have got any good ideas, they are welcome. We will take them into consideration. APPENDIX XXVIII GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO. 4819 ANSWERED ON 22.4.2015 Illegal Occupation of Government Properties 4819. SHRI ANIL SHIROLE: Will the Minister of URBAN DEVELOPMENT be pleased to state: (a) whether there are demands pending with the Ministry that all the Government properties illegally occupied by institutions and individuals be brought back; (b) if so, the details thereof, State-wise; and (c) the reasons for such illegal occupation and the specific steps taken/being taken in various States? ANSWER THE MINISTER OF THE STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT (SHRI BABUL SUPRIYO): (a) to (c) The information is being collected and will be laid on the Table of the House.

192 APPENDIX XXIX GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO. 6641 ANSWERED ON 06.05.2015 Land for Netaji Memorial 6641. SHRI ASHWINI KUMAR: Will the Minister of URBAN DEVELOPMENT be pleased to state: (a) whether Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose INA Trust have requested the Government for the allotment of land in New Delhi to set up Netaji Memorial; and (b) if so, the status of the request? ANSWER THE MINISTER OF THE STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT (SHRI BABUL SUPRIYO): (a) Yes, Madam. (b) The matter is under examination.

193 APPENDIX XXX GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO. 4129 ANSWERED ON 23.12.2015 Memorial of Netaji 4129. SHRI ASHWINI KUMAR: Will the Minister of URBAN DEVELOPMENT be pleased to state: (a) whether the Government has received request from various organizations for allotment of land in the vicinity of India Gate to set up Netaji Memorial; and (b) if so, the details thereof and the action taken/being taken by the Government in this regard? ANSWER THE MINISTER OF THE STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT (SHRI BABUL SUPRIYO): (a) Yes, Madam. (b) The matter is under examination.

194 APPENDIX XXXI (Vide para 5 of the Report) Extracts from Manual of Practice & Procedure in the Government of India, Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs, New Delhi. Definition 8.1 During the course of reply given to a question or a discussion, if a Minister gives an undertaking which involves further action on the part of the Government in reporting back to the House, it is called an 'assurance'. Standard list of such expressions which normally constitute assurances and as approved by the Committees on Government Assurances of the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha, is given at Annexure 3. As assurances are required to be implemented within a specified time limit, care should be taken by all concerned while drafting replies to the questions to restrict the use of these expressions only to those occasions when it is clearly intended to give an assurance in these terms. 8.2 When an assurance is given by a Minister or when the Presiding Officer directs the Government to furnish information to the House, it is extracted by the Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs from the relevant proceedings and communicated to the department concerned normally within 10 working days of the date on which it is given. Deletion from 8.3.1 If the administrative department has any objection to treating the list of such a statement as an assurance or finds that it would not be in assurances. the public interest to fulfil it, it may write to the Lok/Rajya Sabha Secretariat direct with a copy to the Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs within a week of the receipt of such communication for getting it deleted from the list of assurances. Such action will require prior approval of the Minister. 8.3.2 Departments should make request for dropping of assurances immediately on receipt of statement of assurances from the Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs and only in rare cases where they are fully convinced that the assurances could not be implemented under any circumstances and there is no option left with them but to make a request for dropping. Such requests should have the approval of their Minister and this fact should be indicated in their communication containing the request. If such a request is made towards the end of the stipulated period of three months, then it should invariably be accompanied with a request for extension of time. The department should continue to seek extension of time till

195 196

a decision of the Committee on Government Assurances is received by them. Copy of the above communications should be simultaneously endorsed to the Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs. Time limit for 8.4.1. An assurance given in either House is required to be fulfilled fulfilling and within a period of three months from the date of the assurance. This assurance. time limit has to be strictly observed. Extension of 8.4.2 If the department finds that it is not possible to fulfil the time for assurance within the stipulated period of three months or within fulfilling an the period of extension already granted, it may seek further assurance. extension of time direct from the respective Committee on Government Assurances under intimation to the Ministry on Parliamentary Affairs as soon as the need for such extension becomes apparent, indicating the reasons for delay and the probable additional time required. Such a communication should be issued with the approval of the Minister. Register of 8.5.1 The particulars of every assurance will be entered by the assurances. Parliament Unit of the department concerned in a register as at Annexure 4 after which the assurance will be passed on to the concerned section. 8.5.2 Even ahead of the receipt of communication from the Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs, the section concerned should take prompt action to fulfil such assurances and keep a watch thereon in a register as at Annexure 5. 8.5.3 The registers referred to in paras 8.5.1 and 8.5.2 will be maintained separately for the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha assurances,entries therein being made session-wise. Role of Section 8.6.1 The Section Officer incharge of the concerned section will: Officer and (a) scrutinize the registers once a week; Branch Officer. (b) ensure that necessary follow-up action is taken without any delay whatsoever; (c) submit the registers to the branch officer every fortnight if the House concerned is in session and once a month otherwise, drawing his special attention to assurances which are not likely to be implemented within the period of three months; and (d) review of pending assurances should be undertaken periodically at the highest level in order to minimise the delay in implementing the assurances. 8.6.2 The branch officer will likewise keep his higher officer and Minister informed of the progress made in the implementation of assurances, drawing their special attention to the causes of delay. 197

Procedure for 8.7.1 Every effort should be made to fulfil the assurance within the fulfilment of an prescribed period. In case only part of the information is available assurance. and collection of the remaining information would involve considerable time, an implementation report containing the available information should be supplied to the Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs in part scrutinize of the assurance, within the prescribed time limit. However, efforts should continue to be made for expeditious collection of the remaining information for complete implementation of the assurance at the earliest. 8.7.2 Information to be supplied in partial or complete fulfilment of an assurance should be approved by the Minister concerned and 15 copies thereof (bilingual) in the prescribed proforma as at Annexure 6, together with its enclosures, along with one copy each in Hindi and English duly authenticated by the officer forwarding the implementation report, should be sent to the Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs. If, however, the information being furnished is in response to an assurance given in reply to a question etc., asked for by more than one member, an additional copy of the completed proforma (both in Hindi and English) should be furnished in respect of each additional member. A copy of this communication should be endorsed to the Parliament Unit for completing column 7 of its register. 8.7.3 The implementation reports should be sent to the Ministry of the Parliamentary Affairs and not to the Lok/Rajya Sabha Secretariat. No advance copies of the implementation reports are to be endrosed to the Lok/Rajya Sabha Secretariat either. Laying of the 8.8 The Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs, after a scrutiny of the implementation implementation report, will arrange to lay it on the Table of the report on the House concerned. A copy of the statement, as laid on the Table, Table of the will be forwarded by the Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs to the House. member as well as the department concerned. The Parliament Unit of the department concerned and the concerned section will, on the basis of this statement, make a suitable entry in their registers. Obligation to 8.9 Where there is an obligation to lay any paper (rule/order/ lay a paper on notification, etc.) on the Table of the House and for which an the Table of assurance has also been given, it will be laid on the Table, in the the House vis- first instance, in fulfillment of the obligation, independent of the a-vis assurance assurance given. After this is done, a report in formal on the same implementation of the assurance indicating the date on which subject. the paper was laid on the Table will be sent to the Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs in the prescribed proforma (Annexure 6) in the manner already described in para 8.7.2. 198

Committees on 8.10 Each House of Parliament has a committee on Government Government assurances nominated by the Speaker/Chairman. It scrutinized the Assurances implementation reports and the time taken in the scrutiny of LSR 323,324 Government assurances and focuses attention on the delays and RSR 211-A other significant aspects, if any pertaining to them. Instructions issued by the Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs from time to time are to be followed strictly. Reports of the 8.11 The department will, in consultation with the Ministry of Committees on Parliamentary Affairs, scrutinize the reports of these two committees Government for remedial action wherever called for. Assurances. Effect on 8.12 On dissolution of the Lok Sabha, all assurances, promises or assurances on undertakings pending implementation are scrutinized by the new dissolution of Committee on Government assurances for selection of such of the Lok Sabha. them as are of considerable public importance. The Committee then submits a report to the Lok Sabha with a specific recommendation regarding the assurances to be dropped or retained for implementation by the Government. ANNEXURE I MINUTES COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT ASSURANCES (2015-16) (SIXTEENTH LOK SABHA) THIRTEENTH SITTING (09.08.2016) The Committee sat from 1500 Hrs. to 1645 Hrs. in Committee Room "139", Parliament House Annexe, New Delhi. PRESENT Dr. Ramesh Pokhriyal 'Nishank' — Chairperson

MEMBERS 2. Shri Rajendra Agrawal 3. Shri E. Ahamed 4. Shri Tariq Anwar 5. Prof. Sugata Bose 6. Shri Naran Bhai Kachhadia 7. Shri Bahadur Singh Koli 8. Shri Prahlad Singh Patel 9. Shri A. T. Nana Patil 10. Shri C. R. Patil 11. Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

SECRETARIAT 1. Shri R. S. Kambo — Additional Secretary 2. Shri J. M. Baisakh — Director 3. Shri S. L. Singh — Deputy Secretary

WITNESSES Ministry of Urban Development 1. Shri Rajiv Gauba, Secretary (UD) 2. Dr. Sameer Sharma, Additional Secretary

199 200

3. Shri B. Anand, Joint Secretary 4. Shri Neeraj Mandloi, Joint Secretary 5. Shri Dharmendra, Joint Secretary 6. Ms. S. K. Ram, Joint Secretary 7. Shri M. K. Sinha, Joint Secretary & OSD 8. Dr. Kumar Vinay Pratap Singh, Economic Advisor 9. Shri R. Prem Anand, Deputy Secretary 10. Shri Narendra Vashistha, Under Secretary Central Public Works Department Shri Abhai Sinha, DG CPWD Delhi Development Authority 1. Shri Arun Goel, Vice Chairman, DDA 2. Shri J. P. Aggarwal, Pr. Comm. DDA 3. Shri Shirpal, Pr. Comm. DDA 4. Shri D. Sarkar, Comm. DDA 5. Shri S. P. Pathak, Comm. DDA 6. Shri Mahendra Kumar Gupta, Comm. DDA Registrar Co-operative Societies, Delhi 1. Shri T. Sreekanth, Registrar Co-operative Societies, Delhi 2. Shri M. K. Tripathy, Director (UD) 3. Shri P. C. Dhasmana, Deputy Secretary (UD) Ministry Of Parliamentary Affairs 1. Shri Mukesh Kumar, Under Secretary 2. Shri Purshotam, Section Officer At the outset, the Chairperson welcomed the Members to the sitting of the Committee and apprised them of the day's agenda. *** *** *** 2. The Committee then took oral evidence of the representatives of the Ministry of Urban Development regarding pending Assurances from the 11th Session of the 15th Lok Sabha to the 4th Session of the 16th Lok Sabha pertaining to the Ministry. The Chairperson, while initiating the evidence proceedings expressed concern over the fact that Assurances given by the Ministry could not be implemented within the prescribed period of three months. The Ministry admitted the delay on their part 201 and informed the Committee that they tried their best in order to fulfil the Assurances. The Committee reviewed all the 30 Assurances (Annexure-III) of the Ministry of Urban Development as mentioned below:— I. Mithi River Development Project USQ No. 3854 dated 04.09.2012 regarding 'Mithi River Development Project' (S. No. 1) Drawing attention of the representatives to the fact that the Assurance pertains to the years 2012 but was transferred to the Ministry of Water Resources only on 13.05.2016, the Committee expressed grave concern and questioned the Ministry as to why they sat over the matter for such a long time of four years and did not transfer it well in time. The Committee were informed that the Committee on Government Assurances of Rajya Sabha in their meeting held on 03.06.2016 at Mumbai, while dealing with the same subject, directed for a joint sitting of Department of Concerned Central Government and the State Government of Maharashtra. Accordingly, a sitting was convened by the Secretary, Urban Development with the Chief Secretary, Maharashtra Government, the Mumbai Metropolitan Regional Development Authority, (MMRDA) and representatives of the Central Water Commission (CWC), Ministry of Water Resources. At the said meeting, all the issues related to the Assurance were discussed at length and it came to light that the DPR sent by the State Government on 27.09.2010 involved a huge amount (i.e. Rs. One thousand crore) and required technical competence of the CWC. The CWC had given various observations on the said DPR whose reply was expected from the local agency i.e. MMRDA. Both sides were asked to ensure the compliance of Assurance after discussion and deliberations so that a final decision could be taken as to which Department should deal with the Assurance and the budget provisions could be made accordingly. The CWC informed that revised DPR with observation was received by them from the MMRDA on 27.07.2016. The Ministry conceded that the delay was basically due to the absence of co-ordination between the State Government and the CEC. Subsequently, they received a revised DPR from the CWC along with their comments on 04.08.2016 which have in turn been sent to MMRDA. The Ministry informed that after receipt of the replies from the State Government (which are expected this month), a sitting of the State Government with the Central Government (i.e. CWC) would be held and that would decide the implementation or otherwise of the Assurance. When the Committee pointed out the tardy progress in Implementation of the Assurance, the Ministry admitted that there was lack of communication between the Ministry and the State Government. Observing that the matter has been pending since 2012, the Committee directed the Ministry to furnish a Part Implementation Report detailing efforts made by them to fulfill the Assurance. As regards transferring of the Assurance, the Ministry informed that until and unless the Ministry of Water Resources accede to it, the onus of implementing the Assurance and providing information on it would lie with the original Ministry i.e. the Ministry of Urban Development. The Committee asked the Ministry to proceed in a time-bound manner 202 to implement the Assurance expeditiously. As the Ministry have sought to transfer the Assurance and have not asked for extension of time, the Committee also advised them to seek extension of six months time to implement the Assurance. II. Revival of GISO USQ No. 3527 dated 12.02.2014 regarding ‘Revival of GISO’ (S. No. 2). The Committee were informed that the Ministry had conducted as internal work study on the subject. The study recommended for further comprehensive evaluation of Government of India Stationary Office (GISO). Initially, Indian Institute of Public Administration (IIPA) was proposed for the same. Then, as per the Government of India rules, it was decided to select the agency through open tendering process. An expression of interest was floated to eight consultants. Out of the eight consultants, however, only two responded. As a result, the process could not get finalized. The Ministry further informed that they are initiating a fresh process to identity a professional human resource agency specialized in the subject and that they have asked for extension of time till December, 2016 to implement the said Assurance. The Committee enquired as to whether the Ministry have come to any conclusion regarding the manpower and assets. The Ministry informed that all the relevant matters would get included in the terms of reference. The Committee desired that a comprehensive evaluation of GISO be undertaken. III. Training to Transport Professionals and Monorail Projects (i) USQ No. 147 dated 09.07.2014 regarding ‘Training to Transport Professional’ (S. No. 3) (ii) USQ No. 254 dated 09.07.2014 regarding 'Monorail Projects' (S. No. 4). The Committee were informed that the Implementation Reports of the above Assurances have been sent to the Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs for being laid before the House. The Committee desired that copy each of the Implementation Reports should also be made available to the Secretariat for record and review purposes. IV. Irregularities in Metro Rail Project USQ No. 1902 dated 23.07.2014 regarding 'Irregularities in Metro Project' (S. No. 5) The Committee were informed that the Report of the Enquiry Committee was forwarded to the CVC (Central Vigilance Commission). As per CVC directive, the Report was further forwarded to DMRC for inquiry. DMRC in turn constituted a sub Committee which gave various recommendations as to who should be held responsible for the alleged irregularities. All the recommendations of the sub Committee have been accepted except one which relates to a five year ban on an Airport Line consultant. The Board was of the view that the consultant should be given an opportunity to be heard. The sub-Committee which consisted of 3 Members has now been reconstituted as one its Members got transferred. Now, the same sub-Committee with new members would decide about proceedings against the particular Airport Line consultant. The 203

Committee denounced the seeking of rather lengthy extension time of one year by the Ministry for fulfilling the Assurance and directed the Ministry to ensure that the said Assurance gets fulfilled in another three months period. The Committee further directed the Ministry to submit a Part Implementation Report. V. National Academy of Public Works USQ No. 4005 dated 06.08.2014 regarding ‘National Academy of Public Works’ (S. No. 6) The Committee pointed out that the Ministry has been asking for an unreasonably long extension of time to fulfill the Assurance which has already been held up for quite some time i.e. since 2014. The Committee were informed that the Government proposes to upgrade certain facilities in a CPWD training institute functioning in Ghaziabad and convert it into the National Academy of Public Works. As the Director General, CPWD was not well acquainted with the subject and could not provide certain information, the Committee felt that there was lack of co- ordination amongst various Departments of the Ministry. Observing that an inordinate length of time has already been taken by the Ministry, the Committee directed the Ministry that the matter be discharged personally at the level of DG, CPWD within a period of three months. VI. Construction of Flats USQ NO. 2777 dated 10.12.2014 regarding ‘Construction of Flats’ (S. No. 7) The Committee were informed that in 2014, both the House Committees accorded their approval to the proposal. Thereafter, a suggestion was received from the Ministry of Skill Development to change the Plan. As per the suggestion, a new set of design was prepared after changing the map. The House Committee of Lok Sabha approved it in July this year and endorsed it to the House Committee of Rajya Sabha. The Ministry contended that the proposal would move forward once it gets the approval from the House Committee of Rajya Sabha. The Committee directed the Ministry of submit a Part Implementation report in the matter. VII. Transparency in CPWD USQ No. 2785 dated 10.12.2014 regarding ‘Transparency in CPWD’ (S. No. 8) The Committee were informed that the Assurance relates to bringing up of alternate financial resources as the CPWD does not have its own finances. The Committee as well as the Ministry observed that the reply gives attention only to the funding mode whereas the question relates to a distinct, an additional, subject. The Committee further noted that the reply given to the above Question in 2012 was incorrect and nothing has been done to set it right. The Ministry assured the Committee that it would send an amended reply. 204

VIII. Excess Staff in DDA USQ No. 2810 dated 10.12.2014 regarding ‘Excess Staff in DDA’ (Sl. No. 9) The Committee observed that the Ministry have been avoiding giving clear reply to the Parliamentary Question. The Committee further pointed out that there is lack of transparency in the manner in which the Ministry have been trying to deal with the issues concerning the Assurance. The Ministry informed the Committee that they had awarded a study to National Productivity Council (NPC) in regard to changes proposed to be made in the organizational structure of DDA. NPC presented a draft revised report on 23rd October, 2015. DDA has requested NPC to revisit the proposal. The Ministry further informed the Committee that they have been conducting regular meetings on the subject and the report is expected to be received by next month. The Committee were dismayed to note that once the report was submitted in 2014, its study and conclusion took a considerable length of time of two years to get completed. The Committee desired that the leakages in the system should be plugged. The Committee also directed the Ministry to furnish Part Implementation Report and to vigorously pursue the matter. The Committee further directed the Ministry to ensure implementation of the Assurance within a stipulated time period. IX. Sewerage Treatment System USQ No. 2990 dated 10.12.2014 regarding Sewerage Treatment System (Sl. No. 10) The Committee noted that Implementation Report of the Assurance has been furnished by the Ministry on 12.05.2016. X. General Discussion (i) General Discussion dated 16.12.2014 (Dr. Harsh Vardhan, M.P.) regarding National Capital Territory of Delhi Laws (Special Provisions) Second (Amendment) Bill (S. No. 11) (ii) General Discussion dated 16.12.2014 (Prof . Saugata Roy, M.P.) regarding National Capital Territory of Delhi Laws (Special Provisions) Second (Amendment) Bill (Sl. No. 12) The Committee expressed concern that even after the Minister's statement on the floor of the House that he would not seek any extension of time for fulfilling the said Assurance, the Ministry have been asking for repeated extensions of time. The Committee were informed that the subject matter of the Assurance is a policy issue where issues related to Delhi Government organizations, NDMC, MCD and DDA are involved. Some issues have been resolved and some are still under process. There are policy making issues at Defence level also. The matter is between the Ministry and the DDA. The Ministry further informed that since different layers are involved, the matter is taking time. The Committee observed that there is lack of co-ordination amongst different Departments concerned and directed the Ministry to pursue the matter and fulfil the Assurance in a time-bound manner. 205

XI. Government Departments at One Place/Common Secretariat (i) USQ No. 3980 dated 17.12.2014 regarding ‘Government Department at One Place’ (Sl. No. 13) (ii) USQ No. 459 dated 25.02.2015 regarding ‘Common Secretariat’ (Sl. No. 16) The Ministry stated that the Minister only mentioned about a proposal in this regard and it should not be construed as an Assurance. The Committee apprised the Ministry that the point of Assurance relates to the outcome of the meeting held under the Chairmanship of the Cabinet Secretary on 07.11.2014 to discuss the proposal received from the Department of Personnel and Training for construction of Common Secretariat Building. The Ministry informed that it is not possible to fix a definite timeframe for construction of a Common Secretariat building of the Union Government as it is a complex issue. The Committee directed the Ministry to furnish the details of the outcome of the meeting and fulfil the Assurance. XII. Land on Lease to Hotels USQ No. 255 dated 25.02.2015 regarding ‘Land on Lease to Hotels’ (Sl. No. 14) The Committee were informed that the Implementation Report has been submitted on 10.05.2016. XIII. Incomplete JNNURM Projects USQ No. 374 dated 25.02.2015 regarding ‘Incomplete JNNURM Projects’ (Sl. No. 15) The Committee were informed that the guidelines of New National Urban Development Mission have been finalised and the Implementation Report has been submitted to the Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs on 15.06.2016. XIV. Utilisation of Funds for Urban Development SQ No. 121 dated 04.03.2015 (Supplementary by Shri Ravneet Singh, M.P.) regarding ‘Utilisation of Funds for Urban Development’ (Sl. No. 17) The Ministry informed that around two months back, a joint directive has been issued to have a Committee which would supervise all the schemes of Ministry of Urban Development at district level. The Ministry further stated that they would furnish the Implementation Report in a short period of time. The Committee directed the Ministry to send the report urgently. XV. Utilisation of Funds for Urban Development (i) SQ No. 121 dated 04.03.2015 (Supplementary by Shri Ravneet Singh, M.P.) regarding Utilisation of Funds for Urban Development (Sl. No. 18) (ii) SQ No. 121 dated 04.03.2015 (Supplementary by Shri Vinod Kumar Boianapalli, M.P.) regarding Utilisation of Funds for Urban Development (Sl. No. 19) 206

(iii) SQ No. 121 dated 04.03.2015 (Supplementary by Shri Prof. Saugata Roy, M.P.) regarding Utilisation of Funds for Urban Development (Sl. No. 20) The Committee were informed that the Assurances have been implemented. The Implementation Report of the Assurance mentioned at Sl. No. 18 was being sent while those of the Assurances mentioned at Sl. Nos. 19 and 20 were furnished on 08.08.2016 and 04.07.2016 respectively. XVI. PPP for Infrastructure Development SQ No. 125 dated 04.03.2015 (Supplementary by Shri Prahlad Singh Patel, M.P.) regarding 'PPP for Infrastructure Development' (Sl. No. 21) The Ministry informed that reminders were sent to the Member who raised the Supplementary Question and who himself happens to be a member of this Committee. When no reply was received, the Ministry sent a dropping request to the Secretariat. The Committee directed the Ministry to verify the address of the Member and meet him personally and pursue the matter. XVII. Housing Societies in Delhi USQ No. 1469 dated 04.03.2015 regarding ‘Housing Societies in Delhi’ (Sl. No. 22) The Committee were informed that the Implementation Report has been furnished on 09.06.2016. The Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs vide SS-06/40/ 10.08.2016 laid the statement of Implementation Report on the table of the House on 10.08.2008. However, the Committee vide their OM. No. USQ 1469/04/03/2015-(CGA) dated 22 September, 2016 informed the Ministry that the same was treated as partly implemented and the Ministry should therefore take necessary action to fully implement the Assurance and lay the same on the Table of the House. XVIII. Reconstruction of Bungalows USQ No. 2369 dated 11.03.2015 regarding ‘Reconstruction of Bungalows’ (Sl. No. 23) The Committee were informed that in order to change the LBZ guidelines, the Ministry have formed Delhi Urban Arts Commission and have held public consultations. The Ministry further contended that as and when the same are finalized, the construction would start accordingly. The Committee observed that the bungalows in LBZ are in shabby shape and the Ministry should have a proper network for the purpose of maintenance of bungalows and if there is lack of manpower for the work, the matter should be brought before the Ministry for consideration and necessary action. XIX. Quota for Women in Urban Local Bodies USQ No. 2489 dated 11.03.2015 regarding ‘Quota for Women in Urban Local Bodies’ (Sl. No. 24) The Committee were informed that for increasing women representation in 207

Urban Local Bodies from 33 per cent to 50 per cent, an amendment in Constitution is proposed for which consultations with the State Governments have been done and the note is under consideration of the Cabinet. The Committee directed the Ministry to furnish a Part Implementation Report in the matter. XX. Winding up of Directorate of Printing USQ No. 3517 dated 18.03.2015 regarding ‘Winding up of Directorate of Printing’ (Sl. No. 25) The Committee were informed that in regard to modernization of printing press, the head start suggestion was to liberate resources for printing presses for financing of modernization at zero cost to the Government. When the suggestion was being made, an advice from the Committee of Secretaries was received to redesign the project in PPP mode. A meeting in this regard was held on 17.07.2015 between the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Urban Development wherein it was decided that initially the proposal for modernization starting from Minto Road Press would be exported to NBCC and the funds be provided by the Ministry of Finance. The work was going on in accordance with this ideology. When a visit was conducted at Minto Road Press on 06.07.2016, it was decided to get the press building renovated by the CPWD. The Ministry contended that discussions on the said proposal are going on at a fast pace. The Committee directed the Ministry to submit a Part Implementation Report in the Matter. XXI. Swachh Bharat Mission (i) SQ No. 403 dated 22.04.2015 (Supplementary by Shri Sukhbir Singh Jaunapuria, M.P.) regarding 'Swachh Bharat Mission’ (Sl. No. 26) (ii) SQ No. 403 dated 22.04.2015 (Supplementary by Prof. Saugata Roy, M.P.) regarding 'Swachh Bharat Mission’ (Sl. No. 27) The Ministry informed that the Assurances have been implemented and they would be forwarding the Implementation Reports soon. The Committee directed the Ministry to send them urgently. XXII. Illegal Occupation of Government Properties USQ No. 4819 dated 22.04.2015 regarding ‘Illegal Occupation of Government Properties’ (Sl. No. 28) The Committee were informed that the information has been collected and the draft reply has been put up for the approval of Hon'ble Minister. The Ministry further stated that as soon as Implementation Report is approved, the same would be furnished. XXIII. Land for Netaji Memorial (i) USQ No. 6641 dated 06.05.2015 regarding ‘Land for Netaji Memorial’ (Sl. No. 29) 208

(ii) USQ No. 4129 dated 23.12.2015 regarding ‘Memorial of Netaji’ (Sl. No. 30) The Committee were informed that the Ministry have received a request from a private trust for allotment of land for constructing a memorial of Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose. Since Government land is not given to private trust, the Ministry of Culture were asked to furnish their views on the matter and the reply is still awaited. The Committee pointed out that the Ministry of Urban Development can own the land and set up a Museum of Netaji with the help of the Netaji Research Bureau in Kolkata which can provide all necessary assistance in this regard. 3 The Chairperson thanked the Members and the representatives for the meaningful discussion and in particular the Ministry for their good work in implementing a number of Assurances. The Committee also urged upon the representatives to make earnest efforts to implement the remaining pending Assurances in a time-bound manner. 4. The representatives of the Ministry of Urban Development thereafter withdrew. 5. A verbatim record of the proceedings has been kept. The Committee then adjourned. ANNEXURE II MINUTES SEVENTH SITTING MINUTES OF THE SITTING OF THE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT ASSURANCES (2016-17) HELD ON 6TH APRIL, 2017 IN COMMITTEE ROOM "C" PARLIAMENT HOUSE ANNEXE, NEW DELHI. The Committee sat from 1500 hours to 1645 hours on Thursday, 06th April, 2017. PRESENT Dr. Ramesh Pokhriyal 'Nishank' — Chairperson

MEMBERS 2. Shri Rajendra Agrawal 3. Shri Naran Bhai Kachhadia 4. Shri Prahlad Singh Patel 5. Shri A.T. Nana Patil 6. Shri K.C. Venugopal

SECRETARIAT 1. Shri R.S. Kambo — Additional Secretary 2. Shri P.C. Tripathy — Director 3. Shri S.L. Singh — Deputy Secretary At the Outset, the Chairperson welcomed the Members to the sitting of the Committee and apprised them regarding the day's agenda. Thereafter, the Committee considered and adopted the following Eleven (11) draft Reports without any amendment: (i) Draft 48th Report regarding Review of Pending Assurances Pertaining to the Ministry of Civil Aviation; (ii) Draft 49th Report regarding Review of Pending Assurces Partainig to the Department of Atomic Energy; (iii) Draft 50th Report regarding requests for dropping of Assurances (Acceded to); (iv) Draft 51st Report regarding requests for dropping of Assurances (Not Acceded to);

209 210

(v) Draft 52nd Report regarding Review of Pending Assurances Pertaining to the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas; (vi) Draft 53rd Report regarding Review of Pending Assurances Pertaining to the Ministry of Culture; (vii) Draft 54th Report regarding Review of Pending Assurances Pertaining to the Union Territory of Lakshadweep; (viii) Draft 55th Report regarding Review of Pending Assurances Pertaining to the Ministry of Home Affairs; (ix) Draft 56th Report regarding Review of Pending Assurances Pertaining to the Ministry of Urban Development; (x) Draft 57th Report regarding requests for dropping of Assurances (Acceded to); (xi) Draft 58th Report regarding requests for dropping of Assurances (Not Acceded to); 2. The Committee also authorized the Chairperson to present the Reports during the current session of the Lok Sabha. *** *** *** The Committee then adjourned. ANNEXURE III STATEMENT OF PENDING ASSURANCES OF THE MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT (FROM 11TH SESSION OF 15TH LOK SABHA TO 4TH SESSION OF 16TH LOK SABHA)

Sl. No. SQ/USQ No. dated Subject 1. USQ No. 3854 Mithi River Development Project dated 04.09.2012 2. USQ No. 3527 Revival of GISO dated 12.02.2014 3. USQ No. 147 Training to Transport Professionals dated 09.07.2014 4. USQ No. 254 Mono Rail Projects dated 09.07.2014 5. USQ No. 1902 Irregularities in Metro Rail Proejct dated 23.07.2014 6. USQ No. 4005 National Academy of Public Works dated 06.08.2014 7. USQ No. 2777 Construction of Flats dated 10.12.2014 8. USQ No. 2785 Transparency in CPWD dated 10.12.2014 9. USQ No. 2810 Excess Staff in DDA dated 10.12.2014 10. USQ No. 2990 Sewerage Treatment System dated 10.12.2014 11. General Discussion National Capital Territory of Delhi Laws dated 16.12.2014 (Special Provisions) Second Amendment Bill (Dr. Harsh Vardhan, M.P.) 12. General Discusison Discussion on the National Capital Territory dated 16.12.2014 of Delhi Laws (Special Provisions) Second (Prof. Saugata Roy, M.P.) (Amendment) Bill

211 212

Sl. No. SQ/USQ No. dated Subject 13. USQ No. 3980 Government Departments at One Place dated 17.12.2014 14. USQ No. 255 Land on Lease to Hotels dated 25.02.2015 15. USQ No. 374 Incomplete JNNURM Projects dated 25.02.2015 16. USQ No. 459 Common Secretariat dated 25.02.2015 17. SQ No. 121 Utilisation of Funds for Urban Development dated 04.03.2015 (Shri Ravneet Singh, M.P.) 18. SQ No. 121 Utilisation of Funds for Urban Development dated 04.03.2015 (Shri Ravneet Singh, M.P.) 19. SQ No. 121 Utilisation of Funds for Urban Development dated 04.03.2015 (Shri Vinod Kumar Boianapalli, MP) 20. SQ No. 121 Utilisaiton of Funds for Urban Development dated 04.03.2015 (Prof. Saugata Roy, M.P.) 21. SQ No. 125 PPP for Infrastructure Development dated 04.03.2015 (Shri Prahlad Singh Patel, M.P.) 22. USQ No. 1469 Housing Societies in Delhi dated 04.03.2015 23. USQ No. 2369 Reconstruction of Bungalows dated 11.03.2015 24. USQ No. 2489 Quota for Women in Urban Local Bodies dated 11.03.2015 25. USQ No. 3517 Winding up of Directorate of Printing dated 18.03.2015 213

Sl. No. SQ/USQ No. dated Subject 26. SQ No. 403 Swachh Bharat Mission dated 22.04.2015 (Shri Sukhbir Singh Jaunapuria, M.P.) 27. SQ No. 403 Swachh Bharat Mission dated 22.04.2015 (Prof. Saugata Roy, M.P.) 28. USQ No. 4819 Illegal Occuption of Government Properties dated 22.04.2015 29. USQ No. 6641 Land for Netaji Memorial dated 06.05.2015 30. USQ No. 4129 Memorial of Netaji dated 23.12.2015

GMGIPMRND—638LS—12-09-2017 "All Parliamentary Publications including DRSC Reports are available on sale at the Sales Counter, Reception, Parliament House (Tel. Nos. 23034726, 23034495, 23034496). Agents appointed by Lok Sabha Secretariat and Publications Division, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi (Tel. Nos. 24367260, 24365610) and their outlets. The said information is available on website ‘www.parliamentofindia.nic.in’. The Souvenir items with logo of Parliament are also available at Sales Counter, Reception, Parliament House, New Delhi. The Souvenir items with Parliament Museum logo are available for sale at Souvenir Shop (Tel. No. 23035323), Parliament Museum, Parliament Library Building, New Delhi. List of these items are available on the website mentioned above.”