DOCSLIB.ORG

Nuanced but Never Dry

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nuanced but Never Dry Nuanced but Never Dry By JULIA M. KLEIN American Spirits: The Rise and Fall of Prohibition National Constitution Center Through April 28 Philadelphia Mention Prohibition, and the images flow: flappers, speakeasies, gangsters, bootleggers. The national fascination with the period still infuses popular culture, inspiring shows such as HBO's violent, sexually charged "Boardwalk Empire." The National Constitution Center's new exhibition, "American Spirits: The Rise and Fall of Prohibition," duly features a re-created speakeasy, beaded dresses and mug shots of gangsters, as well as "untouchable" Prohibition agent Eliot Ness's oath of office. But the show, which will travel to at least five other venues, also offers a more nuanced examination of this strange interlude, from 1920 to 1933, during which law breaking was invested with a rare glamor. Balancing the imperative to entertain with serious history was "the hardest part" of crafting "American Spirits," says curator Daniel Okrent, the author of "Last Call: The Rise and Fall of Prohibition." The aim was "to be fun, first and foremost," says Stephanie Reyer, the center's vice president of exhibitions. The National Constitution Center's new exhibition, "American Spirits: The Rise and Fall of Prohibition," offers a more nuanced view of the Prohibition era. The center is billing "American Spirits" as the "first comprehensive exhibition about Prohibition." Exhibits illustrate the country's longstanding love affair with alcohol; the surprising links between Prohibition, suffrage and the federal income tax; the era's impact on Fourth Amendment protections against "unreasonable searches and seizures," and the economics of repeal. But visitors can also get their photos taken in a lineup with Al Capone and Lucky Luciano, chase rumrunners in a video game, and learn to dance the Charleston. Mr. Okrent, a writer and editor whose résumé includes inventing a fantasy baseball league, serving as the New York Times' first public editor, and co-creating the current off-Broadway show "Old Jews Telling Jokes," says he approached the National Constitution Center with the exhibition idea about four years ago. The nine-year-old history center overlooks the Liberty Bell Center and Independence Hall, Philadelphia's top tourist attractions. But it has struggled financially and tried to boost visits with loan shows—spotlighting figures such as Princess Diana and Bruce Springsteen—whose relevance to the Constitution seemed tenuous at best. "Stephanie says in her speeches that it's very hard to do a show on the separation of powers between the states and the federal government," Mr. Okrent says. "So I was able to say, 'Have I got two amendments for you.'" "Of the 27 amendments we have to work with at the center, these [the 18th and 21st, Prohibition and its repeal] are by far the sexiest," Ms. Reyer says. Mr. Okrent had hoped—unrealistically—to time the exhibition to coincide with his book's 2010 publication. But Ms. Reyer did convince her colleagues to sign off on the center's most ambitious self-curated show to date, with more than 100 artifacts, vintage films, an iPod tour and interactive quizzes and games. Of the show's 50 lenders, Mr. Okrent is the second-biggest (after Anheuser-Busch), supplying five artifacts from his seven-piece collection of Prohibition-related memorabilia. One is a symbolic hatchet, a saloon accessory from the early 1900s emblazoned with the slogan "All Nations Welcome But Carrie." The reference is to temperance crusader Carrie Nation's predilection for vandalizing saloons. A hatchet she actually wielded and a smashed barroom mirror are also in the show. An 1876 letter from Susan B. Anthony to Frances Willard, president of the Woman's Christian Temperance Union, suggests the entwining of the suffrage and temperance movements. "The two movements grew up together as sisters," Mr. Okrent notes, "and they entered the Constitution within months of each other." The 19th Amendment, giving women the vote, was ratified Aug. 18, 1920—seven months after Prohibition took effect. Mr. Okrent's favorite artifact is a telephone that belonged to the Pacific Northwest bootlegger Roy Olmstead. Olmstead was the most exemplary of bootleggers—a former Seattle policeman who, according to an exhibit label, never diluted his liquor or engaged in other criminal behavior. "The entire political and commercial establishment got their liquor from him," says Mr. Okrent. "He was a local hero." Tapping Olmstead's phone without a warrant allowed the feds to destroy his operation and put him in prison. He sued, claiming a Fourth Amendment violation, but lost. The 1928 Supreme Court decision upholding the wiretapping wasn't overturned until 1967. The centerpiece of "American Spirits" is a complex, colorful device, evocative of a carnival game, that shows how the 18th Amendment was passed. Mr. Okrent says he ordered up a "Rube Goldberg machine"—and got more than he'd expected. With flashing lights, sounds and multifarious moving parts, "Wayne Wheeler's Amazing Amendment Machine" demonstrates how Wheeler, the Anti-Saloon League's legislative mastermind, shepherded the amendment, which outlawed the manufacture, transport and sale of "intoxicating liquors," from pipe dream to reality. To replace taxes on alcohol, which Prohibition would eliminate, the creation of a federal income tax (the 16th Amendment) was essential, Mr. Okrent says. Another key was the willingness of Prohibition supporters to punish politicians for any deviation from the "dry" party line, as well as to accept allies—from the suffragists to the Ku Klux Klan—wherever they found them. A clear majority of the country probably never favored Prohibition, Mr. Okrent says. But, once the amendment and the enabling Volstead Act were passed, they settled in to enjoy it. The era of bathtub gin, rumrunners and underground drinking began. Men and women congregated in speakeasies, listening to jazz, sipping sweet cocktails and dancing the Charleston. In the end, it wasn't corruption and rampant law-breaking that doomed Prohibition—it was economics. "The stock market crash and the onset of the Depression—that's what kills Prohibition," Mr. Okrent says. Repeal meant that breweries, distilleries, bottle-making plants and other industries could roar back to life—"a great jobs program," he says. And states could introduce the liquor regulations—from blue laws to monopolistic control—that still bedevil us today. Ms. Klein is a cultural reporter and critic in Philadelphia and a contributing editor at Columbia Journalism Review. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Volume 59, Issue 1
    Volume 60, Issue 4 Page 1023 Stanford Law Review THE SURPRISINGLY STRONGER CASE FOR THE LEGALITY OF THE NSA SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM: THE FDR PRECEDENT Neal Katyal & Richard Caplan © 2008 by the Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, from the Stanford Law Review at 60 STAN. L. REV. 1023 (2008). For information visit http://lawreview.stanford.edu. THE SURPRISINGLY STRONGER CASE FOR THE LEGALITY OF THE NSA SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM: THE FDR PRECEDENT Neal Katyal* and Richard Caplan** INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................1024 I. THE NSA CONTROVERSY .................................................................................1029 A. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act................................................1029 B. The NSA Program .....................................................................................1032 II. THE PRECURSOR TO THE FDR PRECEDENT: NARDONE I AND II........................1035 A. The 1934 Communications Act .................................................................1035 B. FDR’s Thirst for Intelligence ....................................................................1037 C. Nardone I...................................................................................................1041 D. Nardone II .................................................................................................1045 III. FDR’S DEFIANCE OF CONGRESS AND THE SUPREME COURT..........................1047 A. Attorney General
    [Show full text]
  • The American Postdramatic Television Series: the Art of Poetry and the Composition of Chaos (How to Understand the Script of the Best American Television Series)”
    RLCS, Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 72 – Pages 500 to 520 Funded Research | DOI: 10.4185/RLCS, 72-2017-1176| ISSN 1138-5820 | Year 2017 How to cite this article in bibliographies / References MA Orosa, M López-Golán , C Márquez-Domínguez, YT Ramos-Gil (2017): “The American postdramatic television series: the art of poetry and the composition of chaos (How to understand the script of the best American television series)”. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 72, pp. 500 to 520. http://www.revistalatinacs.org/072paper/1176/26en.html DOI: 10.4185/RLCS-2017-1176 The American postdramatic television series: the art of poetry and the composition of chaos How to understand the script of the best American television series Miguel Ángel Orosa [CV] [ ORCID] [ GS] Professor at the School of Social Communication. Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador (Sede Ibarra, Ecuador) – [email protected] Mónica López Golán [CV] [ ORCID] [ GS] Professor at the School of Social Communication. Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador (Sede Ibarra, Ecuador) – moLó[email protected] Carmelo Márquez-Domínguez [CV] [ ORCID] [ GS] Professor at the School of Social Communication. Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador Sede Ibarra, Ecuador) – camarquez @pucesi.edu.ec Yalitza Therly Ramos Gil [CV] [ ORCID] [ GS] Professor at the School of Social Communication. Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador (Sede Ibarra, Ecuador) – [email protected] Abstract Introduction: The magnitude of the (post)dramatic changes that have been taking place in American audiovisual fiction only happen every several hundred years. The goal of this research work is to highlight the features of the change occurring within the organisational (post)dramatic realm of American serial television.
    [Show full text]
  • A General Model of Illicit Market Suppression A
    ALL THE SHIPS THAT NEVER SAILED: A GENERAL MODEL OF ILLICIT MARKET SUPPRESSION A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Government. By David Joseph Blair, M.P.P. Washington, DC September 15, 2014 Copyright 2014 by David Joseph Blair. All Rights Reserved. The views expressed in this dissertation do not reflect the official policy or position of the United States Air Force, Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. ii ALL THE SHIPS THAT NEVER SAILED: A GENERAL MODEL OF TRANSNATIONAL ILLICIT MARKET SUPPRESSION David Joseph Blair, M.P.P. Thesis Advisor: Daniel L. Byman, Ph.D. ABSTRACT This model predicts progress in transnational illicit market suppression campaigns by comparing the relative efficiency and support of the suppression regime vis-à-vis the targeted illicit market. Focusing on competitive adaptive processes, this ‘Boxer’ model theorizes that these campaigns proceed cyclically, with the illicit market expressing itself through a clandestine business model, and the suppression regime attempting to identify and disrupt this model. Success in disruption causes the illicit network to ‘reboot’ and repeat the cycle. If the suppression network is quick enough to continually impose these ‘rebooting’ costs on the illicit network, and robust enough to endure long enough to reshape the path dependencies that underwrite the illicit market, it will prevail. Two scripts put this model into practice. The organizational script uses two variables, efficiency and support, to predict organizational evolution in response to competitive pressures.
    [Show full text]
  • Boardwalk Empire
    BOARDWALK EMPIRE "Pilot" Written by Terence Winter FIRST DRAFT April 16, 2008 EXT. ATLANTIC OCEAN - NIGHT With a buoy softly clanging in the distance, a 90-foot fishing schooner, the Tomoka, rocks lazily on the open ocean, waves gently lapping at its hull. ON DECK BILL MCCOY, pensive, 40, checks his pocket watch, then spits tobacco juice as he peers into the darkness. In the distance, WE SEE flickering lights, then HEAR the rumble of motorboats approaching, twenty in all. Their engines idle as the first pulls up and moors alongside. BILL MCCOY (calling down) Sittin' goddarnn duck out here. DANNY MURDOCH, tough, 30s, looks up from the motorboat, where he's accompanied by a YOUNG HOOD, 18. MURDOCH So move it then, c'mon. ON DECK McCoy yankS a canvas tarp off a mountainous stack of netted cargo -- hundreds of crates marked 'Canadian Club Whiskey·. With workmanlike precision, he and .. three CREWMAN hoist the first load of two dozen crates up and over the side, lowering it down on a pulley. As the net reaches the motorboat: MURDOCH (CONT'D) (to the Young Hood) Liquid gold, boyo. They finish setting the load in place, then Murdoch guns the motorboat and heads off. Another boat putters in to take his slot as the next cargo net is lowered. TRACK WITH MURDOCH'S MOTORBOAT as it heads inland through the darkness over the water. Slowly, a KINGDOM OF LIGHTS appears on the horizon, with grand hotels, massive neon signs, carnival rides and giant lighted piers lining its shore. As we draw closer, WE HEAR faint music which grows louder and LOUDER -- circus calliope mixed with raucous Dixieland jazz.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: WORK UNDER DEMOCRACY
    ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: WORK UNDER DEMOCRACY: LABOR, GENDER AND ARENDTIAN CITIZENSHIP Alison Kathryn Staudinger, Doctor of Philosophy, 2013 Dissertation Directed by: Stephen Elkin, Professor Emeritus Government & Politics In the interest of promoting a co-constitutive theory of democratic citizenship, this dissertation explores three questions. I ask how work is defined and how this definition creates a hierarchy of types of work, which then leads to my second question, which is how definitions of work or what is not work are carried over into the public space of poli- tics and citizenship, such that even legal citizens may be marginalized by the type of work that they do. I first critique democratic theory, particularly as centered on the idea of the public sphere, for failing to think about work, especially the labor that is required to build these political spaces. I then show how the contemporary economy challenges the ability of citizens to engage in political work because it produces conditions of pre- carious labor, ubiquitous work, the depoliticization of work itself, and incompatibility of wage labor and family life. I use two historical case studies to explore how groups have claimed collective rights housed in the substantive needs of communities when asserting the validity of their work for citizenship. I look to the Articles of Confederation and Dan- iel Shays for an example focused on waged labor, and then the temperance and Anti- temperance movements for a consideration of gendered reproductive labor. I then address my third question, which is whether it is possible to promote the political work of co- constituting a shared public world without also denigrating the labor, particularly care labor, that is supportive of this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Jenny Parker Mccloskey, 215-409-6616 Merissa Blum, 215-409-6645 [email protected] [email protected]
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Jenny Parker McCloskey, 215-409-6616 Merissa Blum, 215-409-6645 [email protected] [email protected] NATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER TO BRING BACK PROHIBITION IN MARCH 2017 Original exhibit, American Spirits: The Rise and Fall of Prohibition, returns for a limited engagement Exhibit opens Friday, March 3 Philadelphia, PA (January 5, 2017) – The National Constitution Center is bringing back American Spirits: The Rise and Fall of Prohibition, its critically acclaimed exhibit that brings the story of Prohibition vividly to life. The exhibit, created by the National Constitution Center, originally debuted in 2012 and has since toured nationally, including stops at the Seattle’s Museum of History and Industry in Washington, Grand Rapids Public Museum in Michigan, and Peoria Riverfront Museum in Illinois. It will open to the public Friday, March 3 and run through July 16, 2017. An exclusive, members-only sneak preview opening party is planned for Thursday, March 2. The event will include an America’s Town Hall panel discussion on the constitutionality of Prohibition and its impact on American society today. “We are thrilled to have this superb exhibit back from its national tour,” said President and CEO Jeffrey Rosen. “American Spirits brings the U.S. Constitution to life. Visitors can educate themselves about the constitutional legacy of Prohibition and how to amend the Constitution today.” The exhibit uses a mix of artifacts and engaging visitor activities to take visitors back in time to the dawn of the temperance movement, through the Roaring ’20s, and to the unprecedented repeal of a constitutional amendment.
    [Show full text]
  • Prohibition (1920-1933) Internet Assignment
    Prohibition (1920-1933) Internet Assignment Name______________________________________ Period_____ Go to: https://www.pbs.org/kenburns/prohibition/ Click on “Roots of Prohibition” Read the section and answer the questions below. 1. By 1830, the average American over 15 years old consumed nearly _______ gallons of pure alcohol a year. 2. In which institutions did the Temperance Movement have their “roots”? Watch the short video entitled, “The Absolute Shall” 3. Why were the Washingtonian Societies rejected by the Protestant Churches of the 1830s and 1840s? 4. What was the anti-alcohol movement started by the Protestant churches called? 5. What was the “Cold Water Army”? Read the sections about the Women’s Christian Temperance Union and the Anti-Saloon League. 6. Which two famous “suffragettes” were also involved with the Temperance Movement? 7. Who was the leader of the Anti-Saloon League? 8. Why did the ASL support the 16th Amendment making an income tax constitutional? 9. What types of propaganda did the ASL put forth during the years leading up to World War I? Page | 1 Go back to the top of the screen and click on “Prohibition Nationwide.” This will take you to a map. Click on the bottle depicted in the Pacific Northwest. Watch the video entitled, “The Good Bootlegger” about Roy Olmstead and his Pacific NW Bootleggers. 10. What was Roy Olmstead’s job? 11. After being convicted of bootlegging alcohol & losing his job, what did Olmstead decide to do? 12. From which country did Olmstead and his employees get the alcohol? 13. What were some of the ways in which Olmstead and his employees distributed the alcohol? 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Accepted Manuscript Version
    Research Archive Citation for published version: Kim Akass, and Janet McCabe, ‘HBO and the Aristocracy of Contemporary TV Culture: affiliations and legitimatising television culture, post-2007’, Mise au Point, Vol. 10, 2018. DOI: Link to published article in journal's website Document Version: This is the Accepted Manuscript version. The version in the University of Hertfordshire Research Archive may differ from the final published version. Copyright and Reuse: This manuscript version is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives License CC BY NC-ND 4.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. Enquiries If you believe this document infringes copyright, please contact Research & Scholarly Communications at [email protected] 1 HBO and the Aristocracy of TV Culture : affiliations and legitimatising television culture, post-2007 Kim Akass and Janet McCabe In its institutional pledge, as Jeff Bewkes, former-CEO of HBO put it, to ‘produce bold, really distinctive television’ (quoted in LaBarre 90), the premiere US, pay- TV cable company HBO has done more than most to define what ‘original programming’ might mean and look like in the contemporary TV age of international television flow, global media trends and filiations. In this article we will explore how HBO came to legitimatise a contemporary television culture through producing distinct divisions ad infinitum, framed as being rooted outside mainstream commercial television production. In creating incessant divisions in genre, authorship and aesthetics, HBO incorporates artistic norms and principles of evaluation and puts them into circulation as a succession of oppositions— oppositions that we will explore throughout this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Olmstead V. United States: the Constitutional Challenges of Prohibition Enforcement
    Olmstead v. United States: The Constitutional Challenges of Prohibition Enforcement by Richard F. Hamm University at Albany, SUNY Edited by the Federal Judicial Center for inclusion in the project Federal Trials and Great Debates in United States History Federal Judicial Center Federal Judicial History Offi ce 2010 This Federal Judicial Center publication was undertaken in furtherance of the Center’s statutory mis- sion to “conduct, coordinate, and encourage programs relating to the history of the judicial branch of the United States government.” The views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the Federal Judicial Center. Olmstead v. United States: The Constitutional Challenges of Prohibition Enforcement Contents Olmstead v. United States: A Short Narrative, 1 Introduction, 1 National Prohibition and its enforcement, 2 Prohibition in Seattle: The Olmstead ring, 3 Federal enforcement of Prohibition in Washington State, 3 Wiretapping the bootlegger, 4 From indictment to trial, 5 The trial, 6 The appeals, 7 Prohibition in the Supreme Court, 8 The aftermath, 10 The Federal Courts and Their Jurisdiction, 13 United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, 13 United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 13 Supreme Court of the United States, 14 The Judicial Process: A Chronology, 15 Legal Questions Before the Federal Courts, 19 Did the use of evidence gained from wiretaps and confi scated papers violate the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures? 19
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Draft
    PRELIMINARY DRAFT Pacific Northwest Quarterly Index Volumes 1–98 N­R Compiled by Janette Rawlings A few notes on the use of this index The index was alphabetized using the word­by­word system. In this system, alphabetizing continues until the end of the first word. Subsequent words are considered only when other entries begin with the same word. The locators consist of the volume number, issue number, and page numbers. So, in the entry “Gamblepudding and Sons, 36(3):261–62,” 36 refers to the volume number, 3 to the issue number, and 261­62 to the page numbers. ii “‘Names Joined Together as Our Hearts Are’: The N Friendship of Samuel Hill and Reginald H. NAACP. See National Association for the Thomson,” by William H. Wilson, 94(4):183­ Advancement of Colored People 96 Naches and Columbia River Irrigation Canal, "The Naming of Seward in Alaska," 1(3):159–161 10(1):23–24 "The Naming of Elliott Bay: Shall We Honor the Naches Pass, Wash., 14(1):78–79 Chaplain or the Midshipman?," by Howard cattle trade, 38(3):194–195, 202, 207, 213 A. Hanson, 45(1):28–32 The Naches Pass Highway, To Be Built Over the "Naming Stampede Pass," by W. P. Bonney, Ancient Klickitat Trail the Naches Pass 12(4):272–278 Military Road of 1852, review, 36(4):363 Nammack, Georgiana C., Fraud, Politics, and the Nackman, Mark E., A Nation within a Nation: Dispossession of the Indians: The Iroquois The Rise of Texas Nationalism, review, Land Frontier in the Colonial Period, 69(2):88; rev.
    [Show full text]
  • Prohibition Era Dinner Party
    PROHIBITION ERA DINNER PARTY OVERVIEW Many noteable Americans played many roles during the Prohibition era, from government officials and social reformers to bootleggers and crime bosses. Each person had his or her own reasons for supporting or opposing Prohibition. What stances did these individuals take? What legal, moral, and ethical questions did they have to wrestle with? Why were their actions important? And how might a "dinner party" attended by them bring some of these questions to the surface? related activities PROHIBITION SMART BOARD WHO SAID IT? THE RISE & FALL OF PICTIONARY ACTIVITY QUOTE SORTING PROHIBITION ESSAY Use your skills to get Learn about Learn about the Learn about the classmates to identify Prohibition through differences between background of the and define which informational slides the Founders’ and 18th Amendment, Prohibition era term and activities using the Progressives’ beliefs the players in the you draw. SMART platform. about government by movement, and its sorting quotes from eventual repeal. each group. Made possible in part Developed in by a major grant from partnership with TEACHER NOTES LEARNING GOALS EXTENSION Students will: The son of Roy Olmstead said about his father: “My dad thought that Prohibition was • Understand the significance of historical an immoral law. So he had no compunction figures during the Prohibition era. [misgivings or guilt] about breaking that law.” • Understand the connections between Discuss the statement as a large group. Then different groups during the Prohibition have students respond to the statement in a era. short essay. They should consider the following questions: • Evaluate the tension that sometimes exists between following the law and • How can you know if a law is immoral? following one’s conscience.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida's Peculiar Status During Prohibition
    The Journal of The James Madison Institute The Journal of The James Madison Institute Prohibitionists’ Domain and Smugglers’ Paradise: Florida’s Peculiar Status During Prohibition | Lauren Sumners Editor’s Note: A version of this article originally appeared on Florida Verve, The James Madison Institute’s website devoted to Florida’s arts and culture. he U.S. Constitution’s 18th Millions of Americans chose to Amendment had taken effect at the drink anyway, so the demand for booze beginning of the Roaring Twenties. had to be satisfied through illegal means TThen hailed as a “noble experiment” but that included bootlegging, smuggling, later viewed as a colossal mistake that speakeasies, and the illegal production spawned all sorts of crime, the so-called of alcoholic beverages ranging from “Prohibition Amendment” told a thirsty moonshine whiskey to bathtub gin. nation, “Don’t drink!” During this tumultuous decade, www.jamesmadison.org | 91 The Journal of The James Madison Institute The Journal of The James Madison Institute Florida elected as its Governor a preacher Florida counties along the 250-mile long named Sidney J. Catts, the candidate of stretch of coastline from Titusville in the Prohibition Party, and became the northern Brevard County to Florida City 15th state to ratify the 18th Amendment near the southern border of Dade (now in 1918. Ironic since Florida was also in Miami-Dade) County, had a combined the thick of the aforementioned illegal population of only 82,843, with more than activities, gaining nationwide notoriety half of the population clustered in the as a hotbed of smuggling. These illegal Miami area.
    [Show full text]