DOCSLIB.ORG

Who Governs Britain? PDF Book

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Who Governs Britain? PDF Book WHO GOVERNS BRITAIN? PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Anthony King | 352 pages | 09 Apr 2015 | Penguin Books Ltd | 9780141980652 | English | London, United Kingdom Who Governs Britain? PDF Book Referendum Act Heath did not resign immediately as Prime Minister. Politics books. The events of August put the current crisis in perspective. As the Queen was in New Zealand on 7 February, the Prime Minister notified her of his intentions via telegram rather than by the usual protocol of visiting Buckingham Palace. Nov 07, Intery rated it really liked it Shelves: nonfiction. Aug 01, Dan Jones rated it really liked it. On 21 February, the Pay Board released a report on miners' pay, which unexpectedly revealed that they were paid less in comparison with other manufacturing workers, contrary to the claims of the National Coal Board. When one looks at that, one wonders who is truly in control here. Hidden categories: Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from May By the time MPs voted on Wednesday to rule out a no-deal Brexit, it was days since the referendum — and just 16 to the scheduled Brexit date. It happened in Ireland in , on the Lisbon treaty, in Greece in , on an EU bailout, and in Colombia in , on a peace agreement with Farc guerrillas. On suspending Britain's extradition treaty with Hong Kong, and just a week after announcing a Huawei ban, Prime Minister Boris Johnson stated he wanted a positive relationship with China, to maintain engagement and to avoid what he describes as "Sinophobic" and "anti" attacks on anything to do with the country. It could have been so much less painful. Quite chilling when you see it in its entirety. A group of Conservative lawyers recently argued that MPs should not be given a vote over future military action, as they have been since the Iraq war. It was presented in a way here in a way that really brought the issue to life. Close drawer menu Financial Times International Edition. The Conservative campaign was, thus, encapsulated by the now-famous phrase "Who governs Britain? Edward Heath Conservative. Phone lines and a utilities corridor in the basement of the Houses of Parliament. Really useful book - helped settle a few qualms. Topics Politics books reviews Reuse this content. Open Preview See a Problem? Another EU vote, another Scottish independence referendum, even a repeat of the Northern Ireland border poll? It's hard to tell King's politics from the book, although he doesn't seem to fit into the left or the right, probably some kind of Blairite, but with a clear lack of love for socialists or conservatives, so the kind of wishy-washy centrist that is actually quite good for the purposes of this book. May 07, Vikas Datta rated it really liked it. Independent Liberal. Elections and referendums in the United Kingdom. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. The Conservative Party , led by incumbent Prime Minister Edward Heath , lost 28 seats; but achieved a higher share of the vote than Labour. The Daily Mail , in the words of Sandbrook, "directed much of its fire at the unions"; it accused the National Union of Mineworkers , which was affiliated with the Labour Party, of "producing the worst inflation in our history. To do so, he needs to be more bold and clear in setting out Britain's national interests. The shortages were so severe that the country was forced to adopt what was known as "The Three Day Week," which restricted the use of electricity to 72 hours. In the right-wing media, there was fierce condemnation of Wilson and his party. Archived from the original on 1 April Although Heath's incumbent Conservative government polled the most votes by a small margin, the Conservatives were overtaken in terms of seats by Wilson's Labour Party, due to a more efficiently-distributed Labour vote and the decision by Ulster Unionist MPs not to take the Conservative whip. The Syria debate was the first time since the American war of independence that a British government had lost a vote on military action. Thanks for telling us about the problem. Social Democracy. Richard Jenkin. Labour and the Tories regularly won large Commons majorities. Who Governs Britain? Writer Apr 08, ! In the film the narrator warned that Labour would confiscate "your bank account, your mortgage and your wage packet", while pictures of Harold Wilson and James Callaghan dissolved into those of Michael Foot and Tony Benn. Following the reabsorption of Britain into the Roman Empire, the island was further repartitioned by Diocletian , this time into four separate provinces, Maxima Caesariensis in the southeast, with its capital at London, Flavia Caesariensis in the east, with its capital at Lincoln , Britannia Secunda in the north, with its capital at York , and Britannia Prima in the west including present day Wales , with its capital at Cirencester. Companies Show more Companies. Wed 8 Apr Cabinet meetings have leaked, party discipline has disintegrated, parliamentary conventions have been rewritten. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Namespaces Article Talk. It's hard to tell King's politics from the book, although he doesn't seem to fit into the left or the right, probably some kind of Blairite, but with a clear lack of love for socialists or conservatives, so the kind of wishy-washy centrist that is actually quite good for the purposes of this book. Views Read Edit View history. To order Who Governs Britain? Reading this book, I can't tell what the author's own political allegiances are. Britain 'could do better. Another excellent Pelican Introduction. By the time MPs voted on Wednesday to rule out a no- deal Brexit, it was days since the referendum — and just 16 to the scheduled Brexit date. In addition, the Prime Minister ought to handle the rebels by taking a more definitive and clear position on what is Britain's national interest and what isn't, and enforce party discipline. It is a half-decent government. Elections and referendums in the United Kingdom. After the Brexit crisis, could we have another referendum? The China debate in Britain is being hijacked, and the narrative has become regretfully very one sided, there appears to be no effective opposition or check on it whatsoever. Its columnist Peter Jenkins claimed the last ten years had proved that "neither party" had the ability to deal with the country's problems. Mark rated it liked it Apr 30, Bernadette McAliskey Mid Ulster. Hidden categories: CS1 maint: archived copy as title Use dmy dates from February Use British English from February Pages using deprecated image syntax All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from July Pages using bar box without float left or float right. They were calling in the Times last Sunday for the application TikTok to be banned and coordinated with the right wing press in vilifying the country daily. This election saw Northern Ireland diverging heavily from the rest of the United Kingdom, with all twelve candidates elected being from local parties eleven of them representing unionist parties , following the decision of the Ulster Unionists to withdraw support from the Conservative Party in protest over the Sunningdale Agreement. Frank Hansford-Miller. This was a book set out t I'll put my hands up and say that despite being interested in political issues and debate, I know knew? Promoted Content. Historian Dominic Sandbrook describes the "level of partisanship" amongst the national newspapers during the election as "unprecedented" in post-war Britain, with most of the media prejudiced in favor of Heath and the Conservatives. Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Marxist-Leninist England. Heath did not resign immediately as Prime Minister. View 1 comment. This book appealed to me as a good place to start. As former Chancellor Philip Hammond warned, anti-China sentiment in the party is getting out of control and of course out of political expediency, the opposition parties including Labor and the Scottish National Party, are encouraging it. The last couple of years make this a tiny bit out of date, but still fascinating and the recent changes are easy to parse. Sebastian rated it really liked it Apr 13, Very readable The result is a stalemate: the government is too weak to govern, parliament too timid and too disorganised to assume the role. But its limitations remain. It's time for you to speak—with your vote. The Brexit crisis has shown this. The government should seek to respond to this in a shrewd and diplomatic way, seeking to find distance from the Trump administration and creating political space to move away from their demands. When one looks at that, one wonders who is truly in control here. British Movement. Who Governs Britain? Reviews Redirected from Governors of Roman Britain. Their manifesto You can Change the Face of Britain promised voting reform and devolution, although Sandbrook has described their economic policy as "impossibly vague. Alan Carr. Under a cross-party approach, these mandates might have been moulded into something coherent. To ask other readers questions about Who Governs Britain? The China debate in Britain is being hijacked, and the narrative has become regretfully very one sided, there appears to be no effective opposition or check on it whatsoever. Heath sought to take back control in the election, but however the electorate found him unconvincing, leading a hung parliament and another vote later that year, in which Labor attained power. View 1 comment. Bexley Sidcup Old Bexley and Sidcup. Long before Brexit, MPs had started to take back control.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Egypt and the Middle East
    Monitoring Study: British Media Portrayals of Egypt Author: Guy Gabriel - AMW adviser Contact details: Tel: 07815 747 729 E-mail: [email protected] Newspapers monitored: All British national daily broadsheets and tabloids, as well as the Evening Standard Monitoring period: May 2008 - May 2009 1 Table of contents: Egypt & the Middle East Regional Importance Israel Camp David Accords The Gulf Sudan Horn of Africa Diplomacy towards Palestine Before Gaza Conflict 2009 Gaza 2009 Diplomacy The Palestine Border Tunnel Economy Crossing Closures Domestic Egypt Food Religion in Society State Ideology Economy Miscellaneous Domestic Threats Emergency Rule & Internal Security Terrorism Egypt & the West Egypt as an Ally 'War on Terror' Suez Ancient Egypt Influence of Egyptian Art Other Legacies Tourism 2 Egypt & the Middle East Regional Importance Various other Middle Eastern countries are sometimes mentioned in connection with Egypt's regional influence, though very rarely those from North Africa. In terms of Egypt's standing in the Middle East as viewed by the US, a meeting in Cairo, as well as Saudi Arabia and Israel, are "necessary step[s] in the careful path Mr Obama is laying out," notes Times chief foreign affairs commentator Bronwen Maddox (29 May 2009). A "solid" Arab-Israeli peace deal "must include President Mubarak of Egypt," says Michael Levy in the same newspaper (14 May 2009). Regarding a divided Lebanon, the Arab League is "tainted by the commitment of the Saudis and Egyptians to one side rather than the other," according to an Independent editorial (13 May 2008). Egypt appointing an ambassador to Iraq generates interest "not only because it is the most populous Arab country but also because its chargé d'affaires in Baghdad was kidnapped and killed in 2005," writes Guardian Middle East editor Ian Black (2 July 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Does the Daily Paper Rule Britannia’:1 the British Press, British Public Opinion, and the End of Empire in Africa, 1957-60
    The London School of Economics and Political Science ‘Does the Daily Paper rule Britannia’:1 The British press, British public opinion, and the end of empire in Africa, 1957-60 Rosalind Coffey A thesis submitted to the International History Department of the London School of Economics and Political Science for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, August 2015 1 Taken from a reader’s letter to the Nyasaland Times, quoted in an article on 2 February 1960, front page (hereafter fp). All newspaper articles which follow were consulted at The British Library Newspaper Library. 1 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil/PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 99, 969 words. 2 Abstract This thesis examines the role of British newspaper coverage of Africa in the process of decolonisation between 1957 and 1960. It considers events in the Gold Coast/Ghana, Kenya, the Federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland, South Africa, and the Belgian Congo/Congo.
    [Show full text]
  • Austerity, Affluence and Discontent: Britain, 1951-1979
    Austerity, Affluence and Discontent: britain, 1951-1979 Part 5: “The civilised society” - changing attitudes to authority in the 1950s and 1960s Source 1: Striking workers at the British Leyland car plant, Oxford, in the 1970s 2 Austerity, Affluence and Discontent 1951-1979: Part 5 Did the UK become a more ‘permissive society’ during the 1950s and 1960s? Attitudes towards authority The 1968 film If… showed the strict and traditional workings of a boys’ boarding school. Unlike earlier films which used this as the setting for a story about how great the UK had been in the past, the film’s director Lindsay Anderson intended to convey a different message. The climax of the film features a rebel group of boys attacking the school’s Founder’s Day assembly with machine guns and hand grenades. This reflects a change in people’s attitudes towards the elite who ran the country during the 1950s and 1960s – many stopped taking their leaders so seriously and began to question whether or not they were making the right decisions for the people of the UK. 1) What was ‘The Establishment’? ‘The Establishment’ were the privileged elite in UK society who shared similar public school backgrounds or went to Oxbridge. This was sometimes called the ‘old school tie’ network. They were the aristocracy, barristers and High Court judges, high-ranking civil servants and diplomats, Anglican bishops and officers in the Armed Forces. Members of this elite group dominated the Conservative governments of the 1950s and 1960s. Harold Macmillan’s Cabinet included six titled aristocrats and Alec Douglas-Home’s Cabinet had ten Etonians, and out of twenty-three ministers, only three had not been to a public school.1 The old class system based on wealth and inherited titles, defending old-fashioned ideas like imperialism or the importance of the arts rather than science and technology, seemed much less relevant to the UK in the 1950s.
    [Show full text]
  • Never Had It So Good : a History of Britain from Suez to the Beatles Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    NEVER HAD IT SO GOOD : A HISTORY OF BRITAIN FROM SUEZ TO THE BEATLES PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Dominic Sandbrook | 928 pages | 04 May 2006 | Little, Brown Book Group | 9780349115306 | English | London, United Kingdom Never Had It So Good : A History of Britain from Suez to the Beatles PDF Book About this product Product Information A fresh, enlightening and comprehensive history of Britain in the early s by a supremely talented young historian. Both volumes contain a lot of pure information, which is why I read them. TV with Auntie. He explores the growth of a modern consumer society, the impact of immigration, the invention of modern pop music, and the Britis Arguing that historians have been besotted by the cultural revolution of the Sixties, Dominic Sandbrook re-examines the myths of this controversial period and paints a more complicated picture of a society caught between conservatism and change. It could hardly have gone better. Condition: UsedAcceptable. View 2 comments. Five weeks before, the paper had confidently predicted that Britain would never defy world opinion and launch an invasion. In the Suez Crisis finally shattered the old myths o. Most relevant reviews. Namespaces Article Talk. Whatever the Government now does, it cannot undo its air attacks on Egypt Sandbrook manages to show the entanglement of the two in a much more vivid way. The prospect of National Service was a pain, but at least you knew there was a good job waiting for you when you finished. In this book, he references some aspects of social history that he will cover in detail in subsequent volumes and this is sensible.
    [Show full text]
  • Broadcasting in the UK and US in the 1950S
    Broadcasting in the UK and US in the 1950s Broadcasting in the UK and US in the 1950s: Historical Perspectives Edited by Jamie Medhurst, Siân Nicholas and Tom O’Malley Broadcasting in the UK and US in the 1950s: Historical Perspectives Edited by Jamie Medhurst, Siân Nicholas and Tom O’Malley This book first published 2016 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2016 by Jamie Medhurst, Siân Nicholas, Tom O’Malley and contributors All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-4438-8899-0 ISBN (13): 978-1-4438-8899-8 CONTENTS Contributors ............................................................................................... vii Editors ........................................................................................................ ix Acknowledgements .................................................................................... xi List of illustrations .................................................................................... xiii Chapter One ................................................................................................. 1 Introduction Jamie Medhurst and Tom O’Malley Chapter Two ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Adult Trade January-June 2018
    BLOOMSBURY January – June 2018 NEW TITLES January – June 2018 2 Original Fiction 12 Paperback Fiction 26 Crime, Thriller & Mystery 32 Paperback Crime, Thriller & Mystery 34 Original Non-Fiction 68 Food 78 Wellbeing 83 Popular Science 87 Nature Writing & Outdoors 92 Religion 93 Sport 99 Business 102 Maritime 104 Paperback Non-fiction 128 Bloomsbury Contact List & International Sales 131 Social Media Contacts 132 Index export information TPB Trade Paperback PAPERBACK B format paperback (dimensions 198 mm x 129 mm) Peach Emma Glass Introducing a visionary new literary voice – a novel as poetic as it is playful, as bold as it is strangely beautiful omething has happened to Peach. Blood runs down her legs Sand the scent of charred meat lingers on her flesh. It hurts to walk but she staggers home to parents that don’t seem to notice. They can’t keep their hands off each other and, besides, they have a new infant, sweet and wobbly as a jelly baby. Peach must patch herself up alone so she can go to college and see her boyfriend, Green. But sleeping is hard when she is haunted by the gaping memory of a mouth, and working is hard when burning sausage fat fills her nostrils, and eating is impossible when her stomach is swollen tight as a drum. In this dazzling debut, Emma Glass articulates the unspeakable with breathtaking clarity and verve. Intensely physical, with rhythmic, visceral prose, Peach marks the arrival of a ground- breaking new talent. 11 JANUARY 2018 HARDBACK • 9781408886694 • £12.99 ‘An immensely talented young writer . Her fearlessness renews EBOOK • 9781408886670 • £10.99 one’s faith in the power of literature’ ANZ PUB DATE 01 FEBRUARY 2018 George Saunders HARDBACK • AUS $24.99 • NZ $26.99 TERRITORY: WO ‘You'll be unable to put it down until the very last sentence’ TRANSLATION RIGHTS: BLOOMSBURY Kamila Shamsie ‘Peach is a work of genius.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading List for History – Britain
    Reading List – Paper 1: Britain Transformed, 1918-97 Books: Andy Beckett, When The Lights Went Out: What Really Happened to Britain in the Seventies (London: Faber & Faber, 2010) Francesca Carnevali & Julia Marie Strange (eds.), 20th Century Britain: Economic, Cultural and Social Change (2nd Edition) (London: Routledge, 2007) David Cannadine, Class in Britain (London: Penguin, 2000) Peter Clarke, Hope and Glory: Britain, 1900-2000 (London: Penguin, 2004) Juliet Gardiner, Wartime Britain, 1939-45 (London: Headline Review, 2005) Peter Hennessy, The Prime Minister: The Office and its Holders since 1945. (London: Penguin, 2001) --- Never Again: Britain, 1945-51 (London: Penguin, 2006) --- Having It So Good: Britain in the Fifties (London: Penguin, 2007) Ross McKibbin, Classes and Cultures: England, 1918-1951 (Oxford: OUP, 2000) Kenneth O. Morgan, The People’s Peace: Britain Since 1945 (Oxford: OUP, 2001) David Kynaston, Austerity Britain, 1945-51. (London: Bloomsbury, 2007) --- Family Britain, 1951-57. (London: Bloomsbury, 2009) --- Modernity Britain: Opening the Box, 1957-59. (London: Bloomsbury, 2013) --- Modernity Britain: A Shake of the Dice. (London: Bloomsbury, 2014) Martin Pugh, The Making of Modern British Politics, 1867-1939 (3rd Edition) (London: Wiley, 2009) John Ramsden, An Appetite for Power: A History of the Conservative Party since 1830 (London: HarperCollins, 1998) Dominic Sandbrook, Never Had It So Good: A History of Britain from Suez to the Beatles. (London: Little, Brown, 2005) --- White Heat: A History of Britain in the Swinging Sixties (London: Little, Brown, 2006) Graham Stewart, Bang! A History of Britain in the 1980s. (London: Atlantic, 2014) Andrew Thorpe, A History of the British Labour Party (4th Edition) (London: Macmillan, 2015) Nicholas Timmins, The Five Giants: A Biography of the Welfare State (London: Harper Collins, 2001) Robert Tombs, The English and their History (London: Penguin Books, 2014) Alwyn W.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Notes Introduction 1. Tribune, December 3, 1943, in Paul Anderson ed. Orwell in Tribune (London: Politico’s, 2006), 57. 2. Margaret Tapster, WW2 People’s War, an online archive of wartime memories con- tributed by members of the public and gathered by the BBC. The archive can be found at bbc.co.uk/ww2peopleswar. http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/ww2peopleswar/stories/ 65/a5827665.shtml Accessed May 30, 2013. 3. Paul Addison, No Turning Back: The Peacetime Revolutions of Post-War Britain (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2010); Peter Hennessy, Having It So Good: Britain in the Fifties (London: Allen Lane, 2006); David Kynaston Aus- terity Britain, 1945–51 (London, Berlin and New York: Bloomsbury, 2007); David Kynaston, Family Britain, 1951–1957 (London, Berlin, New York: Bloomsbury, 2009); Mark Donnelly, Sixties Britain: Culture, Society and Politics (Harlow: Pearson, 2005); Alwyn W. Turner, Crisis? What Crisis? Britain in the 1970s (London: Aurum Press, 2008); Andy Beckett, When the Lights Went Out: Britain in the Seventies (London: Faber and Faber, 2009); Dominic Sandbrook, Seasons in the Sun: The Battle for Britain, 1974–1979 (London: Allen Lane, 2012); Alwyn W. Turner, Rejoice! Rejoice! Britain in the 1980s (London: Aurum, 2010) and Andy McSmith, No Such Thing as Society: A History of Britain in the 1980s (London: Constable, 2011). 4. British and European resistance to American culture is expounded by Dick Hebdige, Subculture: The Meaning of Style (London and New York: Routledge, 1979); Rob Kroes et al. Cultural Transmissions and Receptions: American Mass Culture in Europe (Amsterdam: VU University Press, 1993) and Rob Kroes, If You’ve Seen One, You’ve Seen the Mall: Europeans and American Mass Culture (Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Please Cite This Article As '“Russia
    University of Plymouth PEARL https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk Faculty of Arts and Humanities School of Society and Culture 2013-05 'RUSSIA WINS SPACE RACE' Barnett, N http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/9394 10.1080/13688804.2013.791419 Media History Informa UK Limited All content in PEARL is protected by copyright law. Author manuscripts are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author. Please cite this article as ‘“Russia Wins Space Race”: the British Press and the Sputnik Moment, 1957.’ Media History, 19, 2 (May 2013). ‘Russia Wins Space Race’: the British Press and the Sputnik Moment, 1957. Abstract: This article traces the development of the British press narrative from the launching of Sputnik in October 1957 to the Soviets’ second satellite, containing a dog, in early November. It argues there was an initial outpouring of surprise, combined with celebration of humankind’s achievement. There was also a sense of loss of national prestige, due to Britain’s lack of an equivalent space programme and the decline of her empire. The launch of the dog prompted widespread commendation, mixed with frivolous popular coverage. The article provides an insight into how this moment impacted on British society and understanding of national identity in the 1950s with imperial superiority, religion and perceived decline being recurring themes. In his State of the Union address in January 2011, Barack Obama referred to a ‘Sputnik moment’, to describe America’s need to create new jobs through scientific research.
    [Show full text]
  • Swinging Sixties: a Social History of Britain, 1960 - 1970
    Swinging Sixties: A Social History of Britain, 1960 - 1970 Richard Adewale Elewomawu Kogi State College of Education, Ankpa, Kog State. Nigeria ABSTRACT Social history seems to be losing its steam after being vibrant for several decades from the 1960s to the 1990s. However, a social history event, the ‘swinging sixties’, which was the long decade between 1958 to 1972 in British history has remain an unending debate among historians and scholars of this period. This period was a time the people of Britain were perceived to be less conservation and changed to a more radical and anti- establishment leading to a more multicultural society driven by technology and innovations?. But several scholars conclude that the so called singing sixties was just an illusion because the people of Britain never really changed, and the society and culture remained the way they were before this period. This research examined this period taking into considerations the various views about the swinging sixties concluding that even though the people were changing, they were still relatively cautious and conservative. Keywords: Social History, Swinging Sixties, Radical, Conservative One historical study that has continually elicit divergent views among historians is about the events of 1960s in Britain. Several historians such as Sally Waller, I. MacDonald claim that there were great changes among the people. Arthur Marwick even went further to describe the changes as a “cultural revolution” (Marwick, 1998). This claim has been refuted by historians such as Dominic Sandbrook, Robert Murphy and Peter Sandler. They assert that the changes witnessed in the sixties were not significant enough because Britain remained the way “it had been twenty years before” 1960s (Sandbrook, 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Lives of Women Change in This Period?
    Austerity, Affluence and Discontent: britain, 1951-1979 Part 4: “We’re not beautiful, we’re not ugly, we’re angry” How far did the lives of women change in this period? Source 1: Swinging London – young people on Carnaby Street in the 1960s 2 Austerity, Affluence and Discontent, 1951-1979: Part 4 How much did the lives of women change between 1951 and 1979? Source 2: A photograph from the1950s showing a husband and wife in the kitchen Women’s role in the home1 The traditional role for women was to be a good wife and mother – to keep the home clean, and make sure the children and husband were fed. This was still considered to be true even in the early 1960s, especially amongst working-class women. Women were expected to give up their job and personal independence when they married or when their first child was born.According to Woman’s Own magazine in 1961, ‘the most important thing they can do in life is to be wives and mothers’.2 The ‘Janet and John’ series of children’s early reading books was first published in Britain in 1949 and reinforced the traditional role for women. Janet was always helping out mum with the housework, while John cleaned the car or built bonfires with dad. Dad went to work, mum stayed at home; mum was always prettily dressed and dad was always appreciative of a clean house and cooked meal. Keeping the house clean and the family fed were not always easy. In the early 1950s feeding the family often required a lot of planning and preparation as rationing was still in effect, and clothes had to be washed and the house cleaned by hand.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lost World of 1962 Transcript
    The Lost World of 1962 Transcript Date: Thursday, 5 July 2012 - 6:00PM Location: Barnard's Inn Hall 5 July 2012 The Lost World of 1962 Dominic Sandbrook Imagine that, whether through science or magic, you woke up this morning and found yourself mysteriously catapulted back in time by fifty years. It is not 5 July 2012, but 5 July 1962, then as now a Thursday, but an unusually cold and rainy day. Perhaps, to get your bearings, you pick up a daily paper – the Times, let’s say. You look at the headlines on the front page and you blink with surprise, because of course there aren’t any. The first column reads ‘Births’, and your eye scans the list of solid and sensible names: Roger Alford, Bridget Evans, Peter Green, Rachel Morgan, Robin Reeves. Under Marriages, it turns out that Arthur Montague and Mary Allen of Fort Road, Guildford are celebrating their silver wedding anniversary, 25 years after they were married in 1937 in the university chapel at Glasgow. Under the headings Deaths follows a long line of septuagenarians and octogenarians, people who were born in the reign of Queen Victoria, lived through the reigns of her son, grandson and great-grand daughter, and saw two world wars, the high point and decline of the British Empire, and the advent of the cinema, television, air travel and even the space race – something that makes you realise that today’s Britons are not the only generation to have experienced extraordinary change. On the second page you find the Appointments and – a telling word – Situations.
    [Show full text]