Summary List of Actions

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Summary List of Actions Appendix 1 Mayor’s Education Inquiry 1. A detailed note setting out the total resources used to undertake the Mayor’s Education Inquiry, including a record of the amount of GLA staff time involved The total resources used to date include direct costs of £46,503 broken down as follows: Chair's renumeration (up to 3 days month at £500 per day from Dec 2011 to end July 2012) £12K and Panel member expenses- £78; Publications - £1,595; Stakeholder engagement events, monthly Panel Meetings and Evidence Hearings– £2,830; Survey of London Schools - £30K A record of the amount of GLA staff time is as follows: Around 2 full-time equivalent staff from beginning November to end July 2012 (Children and Young People’s Unit) - 9 months; Plus around 0.65 full-time equivalent staff from March to end July 2012 (Youth Team) - 5 months 2. A list of the people and organisations who were formally invited to the stakeholder event A comprehensive list of stakeholders invited to the seminar on 24 February is attached at appendix 1. In addition to the above: On 18 May 2012 a workshop on the take up of Science, Technology, Engineering and Maths (STEM) and Modern Foreign Languages (MFL). An event in partnership with A New Direction on 20 June 2012 with guests from the fields of arts, sports, culture, science and schools. A joint GLA/London Pupil Referral Unit Network conference on Tuesday 26th June 2012. A senior level meeting on careers advice on 9 July with representatives from the Association for London Directors of Children’s Services, Young People’s Employment and Skills Board, London Enterprise Panel and London Councils. A series of 3 Evidence Hearings with business leaders, academics and school improvement experts on 4th and 6th July 2012 3. Number of interviews undertaken as part of the head teacher survey work The head teacher survey achieved 530 interviews, which are broken down as follows: 469 were primary phase schools; 61 were secondary phase schools; Comprised of: 13 primary academies; 456 primary maintained; 25 secondary academy; 36 secondary maintained; Education Inquiry - Oversight Committee Paper FINAL Page 1 of 6 The sample was representative of London for Ofsted judgements, FSM rates, location, size and faith character; The results are weighted to make them representative for school phase and academy status; All London Local Authorities are represented in the sample and no single Local Authority accounts for more than 5%. 4. The job descriptions for the members of the Inquiry panel Chair – Role Description: Leadership and strategic thinking Being an effective advocate for education and its power to drive regeneration and greater equality, to enable Londoners to find fulfilling work and to support a thriving cultural, sporting and scientific sector. Representing and promoting the Inquiry to key stakeholders regionally, locally and nationally. Chairing meetings, steering development and implementation to ensure the Inquiry’s ambitions are delivered. Policy and delivery Examining key challenges for education in London, developing an interim and final report with practical recommendations for action. Considering policy issues as they arise including implications of national Government policy changes in London. Considering issues raised by demographic and trend data for London and advising on emerging implications and key priorities for the Inquiry. To provide advice on how best the Mayor and the GLA can add value and support the improvement of educational outcomes for young Londoners particularly for underachieving groups. Relationship building Developing and sustaining strong and collaborative relationships with key regional and national partners and stakeholders e.g. Government Departments, London Councils, the boroughs and Headteachers. Developing appropriate engagement mechanisms with the wide range of external stakeholders with an interest in this area including educationalists, students, parents, schools and others to generate collaborative and innovative proposals for improvement. Being the public voice of the Inquiry, for example, at external events or in meetings with senior officials, Ministers and the media. Person Specification Senior and substantial experience understanding and interest in London’s educational issues, with a particular focus on attainment for under-achieving groups Demonstrable commitment to raising aspiration and equality in education Experience in delivering improved educational outcomes for young Londoners including African Caribbean and white working class boys Ability to lead the Inquiry in developing appropriate recommendations for improvement Understanding of the education landscape and ability to generate consensus, problem solve and bring together divergent views/ stakeholders to improve funding and provision of education in London Education Inquiry - Oversight Committee Paper FINAL Page 2 of 6 High level experience of representing and/or influencing public, private and voluntary sector organisations including academic and educational institutions Effective communicator and ability to represent the Mayor and Inquiry to external stakeholders and the media Panel Members - Role description The Education Inquiry is seeking up to 5 Panel Members from a range of sectors and agencies, and with complementary areas of expertise, who can individually demonstrate: Being an effective advocate for education and its power to drive regeneration and greater equality, to enable Londoners to find fulfilling work and to support a thriving cultural, sporting and scientific sector Examining key challenges for education in London, helping the Chair to develop an interim and final report with practical recommendations for action Considering policy issues as they arise including implications of national Government policy changes in London Reviewing issues raised by demographic and trend data for London and advising on emerging implications and key priorities for the Inquiry Providing advice on how best the Mayor and the GLA can add value and support the improvement of educational outcomes for young Londoners particularly for underachieving groups Supporting the Chair in developing appropriate engagement mechanisms with the wide range of external stakeholders with an interest in this area beyond the Panel’s membership Leading on themed ‘task and finish’ groups or seminars for the panel, on specific areas such as education funding, under-achievement and improving links with business/ cultural sectors Availability for monthly panel meetings until February 2012 when frequency will be reviewed Applications are sought from those with education experience and expertise and we particularly welcome applicants with current roles or backgrounds in schools or colleges, local authorities, academia, business and foundations or trusts. These are unremunerated roles, with payment for necessary travel and subsistence expenses. Person Specification Senior and substantial experience, understanding and interest in London’s educational issues, with a particular focus on attainment for under-achieving groups. Demonstrable commitment to raising aspiration and equality in education. Experience in delivering improved educational outcomes for young Londoners especially from proportionally under-achieving groups such as African Caribbean and white working class boys. Involvement in initiatives generating collaborative and innovative proposals for educational improvement including one or more of the following: educationalists, students, parents, schools. High level experience of representing and/or influencing public, private and voluntary sector organisations including academic and educational institutions. Maintenance of political independence at meetings and other activities, as the Inquiry is politically impartial. Biographies: Dr Tony Sewell, Education Consultant and CEO of Generating Genius (Chair) Education Inquiry - Oversight Committee Paper FINAL Page 3 of 6 Tony is an education commentator and former teacher who is the CEO of Generating Genius, a charity that has successfully placed children from disadvantaged backgrounds into top universities. Tony has published widely on issues related to race, social justice and emotional and behaviourally difficult children. He also has experience in the media, writing for Voice and The New Statesman and regularly speaking on radio and television on subjects linked to education and the arts. He has a strong interest in diversity and has conducted research and published several articles on race and education. Panel Members: Frankie Sulke, Director of Children's Services, London Borough of Lewisham, ALDCS Frankie Sulke started her career teaching mathematics and went on to train new and serving teachers across the South of England. She worked nationally at senior levels for over a decade first at the School Examinations and Assessment Council and School Curriculum and Assessment Authority managing the review of the National Curriculum and leading on national assessment. From 1995, she was Head of Teacher Training at the Teacher Training Agency, developing and introducing the first ever national standards and professional qualifications for serving teachers and head teachers and reforming initial teacher training and induction. Frankie joined the London Borough of Lewisham in April 2001 as Executive Director for Education and Culture and in 2005, Frankie was appointed to be Lewisham’s first Executive Director for Children and Young People. Mr Robert McCulloch-Graham,
Recommended publications
  • Bexleyheath Academy Woolwich Road, Bexleyheath, DA6 7DA
    School report Bexleyheath Academy Woolwich Road, Bexleyheath, DA6 7DA Inspection dates 18−19 September 2013 Previous inspection: Not previously inspected Overall effectiveness This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2 Summary of key findings for parents and pupils This is a good school. ‘The Principal is inspirational.’ ‘We are in a The sixth form is good. Students are phase of strong, meaningful and planned successfully guided onto academic and leadership.’ Such feedback from parents, vocational courses they enjoy and succeed in carers and staff highlights the Principal’s and that lead reliably to further education, outstanding ability to engage and encourage. training or employment. With skilled senior leaders, he is raising Systematic monitoring, well-directed training expectations and improving achievement. and effective teacher recruitment are Most students enter with low attainment and extending and embedding good teaching, as make good progress, particularly those in students’ progress shows. need of additional support. Well-evidenced Governors provide expert challenge and checks on current learning indicate that last support, closely monitoring the impact of year’s improvement is being maintained. leadership, teaching and use of government Government targets are met. funding (Year 7 catch-up and pupil premium). The range of subjects on offer reflects Students are keen and respond happily to national trends, extends students’ options challenge. They treat adults and each other and supports their spiritual, moral, cultural considerately, untroubled by differences of and social development. Good use is made of culture or lifestyle.
    [Show full text]
  • England LEA/School Code School Name Town 330/6092 Abbey
    England LEA/School Code School Name Town 330/6092 Abbey College Birmingham 873/4603 Abbey College, Ramsey Ramsey 865/4000 Abbeyfield School Chippenham 803/4000 Abbeywood Community School Bristol 860/4500 Abbot Beyne School Burton-on-Trent 312/5409 Abbotsfield School Uxbridge 894/6906 Abraham Darby Academy Telford 202/4285 Acland Burghley School London 931/8004 Activate Learning Oxford 307/4035 Acton High School London 919/4029 Adeyfield School Hemel Hempstead 825/6015 Akeley Wood Senior School Buckingham 935/4059 Alde Valley School Leiston 919/6003 Aldenham School Borehamwood 891/4117 Alderman White School and Language College Nottingham 307/6905 Alec Reed Academy Northolt 830/4001 Alfreton Grange Arts College Alfreton 823/6905 All Saints Academy Dunstable Dunstable 916/6905 All Saints' Academy, Cheltenham Cheltenham 340/4615 All Saints Catholic High School Knowsley 341/4421 Alsop High School Technology & Applied Learning Specialist College Liverpool 358/4024 Altrincham College of Arts Altrincham 868/4506 Altwood CofE Secondary School Maidenhead 825/4095 Amersham School Amersham 380/6907 Appleton Academy Bradford 330/4804 Archbishop Ilsley Catholic School Birmingham 810/6905 Archbishop Sentamu Academy Hull 208/5403 Archbishop Tenison's School London 916/4032 Archway School Stroud 845/4003 ARK William Parker Academy Hastings 371/4021 Armthorpe Academy Doncaster 885/4008 Arrow Vale RSA Academy Redditch 937/5401 Ash Green School Coventry 371/4000 Ash Hill Academy Doncaster 891/4009 Ashfield Comprehensive School Nottingham 801/4030 Ashton
    [Show full text]
  • Candidate Information Brochure
    CANDIDATE INFORMATION BROCHURE To inspire young people to make their best better October 2016 Dear Candidate, Thank you for showing an interest in the Teacher of REP role at Tendring Technology College. Tendring Technology College, judged by Ofsted as ‘good’ in all catergories , with the behaviour of students being rated as ‘outstanding’ in March 2016. We opened in August 2011 and are part of Academies Enterprise Trust, the largest nationwide, multi academy sponsor in the country. Academies Enterprise Trust firmly believes that all young people deserve to become world class learners – to learn, enjoy, succeed and thrive in a world class educational environment, which has the best facilities, the best teaching and the most up to date resources available to them. Our vision is to help students achieve world class learning outcomes by developing world class teachers in a world class community. Tendring Technology College has an exciting future and this appointment represents a great opportunity to secure positive outcomes for our learners. If you share our vision and values then we would be very excited to hear from you. Yours faithfully The Recruitment Team Tendring Technology College Tendring Technology College serves a wide catchment area in the Tendring District that is a mix of rural and coastal environment with easy access to the vibrant town of Colchester with London Liverpool Street a straightforward train journey. TTC is unique in that it is a split site College. The Thorpe campus is dedicated to our Key Stage 3 students and nearly 5 miles away is the Frinton campus for our Key Stage 4 and 5 students.
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Day Download the Hansard Record of the Entire Day in PDF Format. PDF File, 1
    Wednesday Volume 662 19 June 2019 No. 316 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Wednesday 19 June 2019 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2019 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 219 19 JUNE 2019 220 Drew Hendry: According to every piece of the Secretary House of Commons of State’s own Government’s analysis, there is no version of Brexit that fails to harm Scotland. New YouGov Wednesday 19 June 2019 polling shows that Tory members would prefer Scotland to be an independent country, rather than stopping Brexit. Which choice should the Scottish Secretary make: The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock a devastating no-deal Brexit Britain, or giving the people of Scotland the choice to be an independent European nation? PRAYERS David Mundell: Mr Speaker, it will not surprise you to hear me say that Scotland has already made its [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] choice on whether to be independent or part of the United Kingdom. The poll to which the hon. Gentleman referred was based on a false premise. This Government are about delivering Brexit and keeping Scotland at the Oral Answers to Questions heart of the United Kingdom. John Lamont (Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk) (Con): Will the Secretary of State tell us how much SCOTLAND money the Scottish Government have given to local authorities in Scotland to prepare for our exit from the The Secretary of State was asked— European Union? Leaving the EU David Mundell: As far as I understand it, the UK Government have made more than £100 million available to the Scottish Government to help to prepare for 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The PTI Schools Programme and Schools Leadership Programme : Member Schools
    The PTI Schools Programme and Schools Leadership Programme : Member Schools (excluding Greater London) Member schools in Greater London East Midlands Subjects in the Schools Member of the Schools School Programme Leadership Programme Ashfield School Modern Foreign Languages Brooke Weston Academy Modern Foreign Languages Brookvale High School Music Caistor Yarborough Academy Maths Yes Carre's Grammar School History Yes Manor High School MFL and Science Yes Monks' Dyke Tennyson College Yes Northampton School for Boys Geography and MFL Sir Robert Pattinson Academy Yes Spalding Grammar School Latin Yes University Academy Holbeach Geography Weavers Academy MFL Art, English, Geography, History, William Farr CE School Yes Maths, MFL, Music and Science Eastern England Subjects in the Schools Member of the Schools School Programme Leadership Programme City of Norwich School History Mathematics and Modern Foreign Coleridge Community College Languages English, History, Art, Music, Davenant Foundation School Science and Modern Foreign Yes Languages Downham Market Academy Yes Harlington Upper School History Hedingham School and Sixth Geography Form Luton Sixth Form College Latin Geography, History, Maths, Monk's Walk School Music, Science and Art Nene Park Academy English Mathematics and Modern Foreign Notre Dame High School Languages Ormiston Sudbury Academy Geography, History and Science Palmer's College English and Science Latin, Science, Mathematics and Parkside Community College Yes Modern Foreign Languages Passmores Academy MFL and Music Saffron
    [Show full text]
  • REFORM Provided by Digital Education Resource Archive
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE REFORM provided by Digital Education Resource Archive Every teacher matters Dale Bassett Andrew Haldenby Will Tanner Kimberley Trewhitt November 2010 Every teacher matters The authors Dale Bassett is Research Director at Reform. Andrew Haldenby is Director of Reform. Will Tanner is a Researcher at Reform. Kimberley Trewhitt is a Researcher at Reform. 1 Every teacher matters Reform Reform is an independent, non-party think tank whose mission is to set out a better way to deliver public services and economic prosperity. Reform is a registered charity, the Reform Research Trust, charity no. 1103739. This publication is the property of the Reform Research Trust. We believe that by reforming the public sector, increasing investment and extending choice, high quality services can be made available for everyone. Our vision is of a Britain with 21st Century healthcare, high standards in schools, a modern and efficient transport system, safe streets, and a free, dynamic and competitive economy. 2 Every teacher matters Dale Bassett Andrew Haldenby Will Tanner Kimberley Trewhitt November 2010 3 Every teacher matters Contents Executive summary 5 1. The importance of teachers 7 2. Central and local government have taken responsibility for teacher quality 14 3. Losing the battle 20 4. The path to performance 26 5. A new approach? 35 6. An action plan for great teaching 38 References 41 Appendix 1: Statutory teaching standards 45 Appendix 2: David Young Community Academy performance management regime 51 Appendix 3: Transcription of ‘Supporting quality teaching’ 55 Appendix 4: Model capability procedure 66 4 Every teacher matters Executive summary The new Government wants to improve the quality of teaching.
    [Show full text]
  • Enfield Schools - What Happened This Year
    Schools & Children’s Services Applying for a Secondary School 2020 Striving for excellence www.enfield.gov.uk Aim: • To inform Year 6 parents about secondary school admissions procedures. 2 Who is eligible? Children born between: 01.09.2008 - 31.08.2009 3 Types of Schools • Community – the Local Authority (elected Councillors) is responsible for deciding the admission arrangements for pupils • Foundation – the School’s Governing Body is responsible for deciding the admission arrangements for pupils Types of Schools • Voluntary Aided - the School’s Governing Body is responsible for deciding the admission arrangements for pupils • Academies and Free Schools–publicly funded state schools. The Academy Council or School Governors are responsible for deciding the admission arrangements Information Booklet- page 10 Schools in Enfield AIM North London ARK John Keats (A) Aylward Academy (A) Bishop Stopford’s CE (VA) Broomfield ( F) Chace Community (C) Edmonton County (A) Enfield County School for Girls(C) Enfield Grammar (A) Heron Hall Academy (A) Highlands (C) Kingsmead (A) Lea Valley High School (A) Oasis Academy Enfield (A) Oasis Academy Hadley (A) St Anne’s RC ( VA ) St Ignatius RC College (VA ) Southgate ( A ) The Latymer (VA) Winchmore ( C ) Proposed new school – Wren Academy, Enfield ( cannot be included in an online application) Admission Criteria • Rules used to decide which children are offered places when there are more applications than places available. • Rules may differ between local authorities and types of schools. • Check school
    [Show full text]
  • HEI/SCITT Contact Details
    HEI/SCITT contact details Email Address Provider Name [email protected] 2Schools Consortium [email protected] AA Teamworks West Yorkshire SCITT [email protected] Alban Federation [email protected] Alliance for Learning SCITT [email protected] Altius Alliance [email protected] Anton Andover Alliance [email protected] ARK Teacher Training [email protected] Arthur Terry National Teaching School Alliance [email protected] Ashton on Mersey School SCITT [email protected] Associated Merseyside Partnership SCITT [email protected] Astra SCITT [email protected] Barr Beacon SCITT [email protected] Bath Spa University [email protected] Billericay Educational Consortium [email protected] Birmingham City University [email protected] Bishop Grosseteste University [email protected] BLT SCITT [email protected] Bluecoat SCITT Alliance Nottingham [email protected] Bournemouth Poole & Dorset Secondary Training Partnership [email protected] Bourton Meadow Initial Teacher Training Centre [email protected] Bradford Birth to 19 SCITT [email protected] Bradford College [email protected] Bromley Schools’ Collegiate [email protected] Brunel University [email protected] Buckingham Partnership [email protected] Buile Hill Visual Arts College SCITT [email protected] Cabot Learning Federation
    [Show full text]
  • Opening a Studio School a Guide for Studio School Proposer Groups on the Pre-Opening Stage
    Opening a studio school A guide for studio school proposer groups on the pre-opening stage August 2014 Contents Introduction 3 Section 1 - Who does what - roles and responsibilities? 5 Section 2 - Managing your project 10 Section 3 – Governance 12 Section 4 - Pupil recruitment and admissions 21 Section 5 - Statutory consultation 33 Section 6 - Staffing and education plans 36 Section 7 - Site and buildings 42 Section 8 – Finance 56 Section 9 - Procurement and additional support 63 Section 10 - Funding Agreement 67 Section 11 - The equality duty 71 Section 12 - Preparing to open 73 Section 13 - Once your school is open 80 Annex A - RSC regions and Local authorities 82 2 Introduction Congratulations! All your planning and preparation has paid off, and the Secretary of State for Education has agreed that your application to open a studio school should move to the next stage of the process – known as the ‘pre-opening’ stage. This is the stage between the approval of your application and the opening of the school. The setting up of a studio school is a challenging but ultimately very rewarding task and it will require significant commitment and time from sponsors and partners. Your original application set out your plans for establishing the studio school, from the education vision and the admission of pupils to the recruitment of staff and the curriculum. Now your application has been approved, you must begin work to implement these plans. The letter of approval you received from the Department for Education (DfE) sets out important conditions of approval. It is vital that you consider these conditions carefully in planning your priorities and what you need to focus on next.
    [Show full text]
  • Candidate Information Brochure Aylward Academy
    CANDIDATE INFORMATION BROCHURE AYLWARD ACADEMY To inspire young people to make their best better November 2016 Dear Candidate, Thank you for your interest in the Curriculum and Assessment Manager role at Aylward Academy. We are passionate about ensuring that, individually, we are continually improving and challenging ourselves and as an academy, striving towards our vision ‘To make our best better’ and become a great school. Aylward is a community academy based in a deprived area of North London. Since its foundation in 2010 it has dedicated itself to the education of young people from the local area, driving the Value Added score up to 1029. There is now a waiting list for year 7 entrants and the sixth form has grown from 30 to just under 300. The academy opened in 2010 with an Ofsted notice to improve and in an extremely short time were graded good in a 2012 inspection. The most recent inspection conducted in the summer of 2016 confirmed the school continues to be good whilst also identifying outstanding features. In 2012 the Ofsted report confirmed that, “Students are well motivated in their learning and their behaviour is good”. It also stated that, “Teachers plan well- structured lessons in line with students’ abilities and this adds to their enjoyment of learning”. We place learning at the core of everything we do at Aylward Academy. We have a committed and highly skilled staff and Governing Body who are dedicated to ensuring that all students achieve the best possible outcomes in their academic qualifications as well as their personal development.
    [Show full text]
  • Secondary Transfer 2021 Allocation Information
    Transfer to Secondary School – September 2021 Places at all Enfield Secondary schools have been allocated in accordance with the published admissions criteria which can be found in the brochure ‘Your Guide to Secondary Schools in Enfield’. Accepting your offer If you applied online you can accept your place by logging onto your eadmissions account. You need to do this by 15 March 2021. We advise that you accept the place offered even if you wish to pursue higher preference schools, either through the waiting list or through the appeal process. Waiting lists All oversubscribed Enfield schools have waiting lists. With the exception of The Latymer School, your child’s name has automatically been included on the waiting list for any Enfield school/s that were a higher preference than the school you have been offered. Please email the admissions team at [email protected] to find out your child’s waiting list position for any of the following schools: Ark John Keats Academy, Aylward Academy, Edmonton County School, Heron Hall Academy, Highlands School, Oasis Academy Hadley, Southgate School, Winchmore School and Wren Academy Enfield. Enfield County waiting list positions will not be available until 17 March 2021. Applying for additional schools If you now want to apply for a different school or want to apply for a school that was a lower preference than the school you have been offered, you will need to complete an ST2 form. This form must be used to apply for all Enfield schools or any schools outside the Borough. Complete the ST2 form and either scan and email it to [email protected] or post to - ESAS, Civic Centre, Silver Street, Enfield, EN1 3XA by 15 March 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Bexleyheath Academy Woolwich Road, Bexleyheath, Kent DA6 7DA
    School report Bexleyheath Academy Woolwich Road, Bexleyheath, Kent DA6 7DA Inspection dates 28–29 November 2018 Overall effectiveness Inadequate Effectiveness of leadership and management Inadequate Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Inadequate Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate Outcomes for pupils Inadequate 16 to 19 study programmes Good Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Requires improvement Summary of key findings for parents and pupils This is an inadequate school The school is failing to give its pupils an Pupils’ behaviour is poor, and teachers’ acceptable standard of education. Leaders are expectations are too low. Pupils’ poor not demonstrating the capacity to improve the behaviour disrupts learning and hinders school. progress. Leaders have not taken essential actions to Different groups of pupils, including the most make improvements. Standards have fallen for able and those with special educational needs several years. and/or disabilities (SEND) make progress that is significantly below national averages. Systems developed by the new leadership team to improve the quality of education in the Governors are not thorough enough in how school are recent and have not yet had an they hold leaders to account. They have not impact. Staff do not use the school’s policies ensured that additional funding for special consistently. Teachers do not use assessment educational needs and the pupil premium are information to inform their planning. Pupils used effectively. make weak progress from their starting points. Leaders do not support staff well enough. Staff The curriculum does not meet pupils’ needs. morale is low. Pupils’ learning is disrupted by a Programmes of study in key stage 3 do not high turnover of staff.
    [Show full text]