DOCSLIB.ORG

Zhao 1985 Trans.Rtf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Zhao 1985 Trans.Rtf Original Article- Zhao Xijin, 1985. The Jurassic Reptilia. In Wang Si-en, Cheng Zhengwu and Wang Neiwen (eds.). The Jurassic System of China. Stratigraphy of China. 11, 286-289, 347, plates 10 and 11. Translation by Leo W Sham, January 3, 2011. (6) Jurassic Reptilian Fauna The Jurassic period was a time of profuse development of reptiles, especially dinosaurs. For convenience of description, [we will] now separate our analysis into the following three stages. Early Jurassic The Early Jurassic was an early stage of dinosaur evolution. Dinosaurs and other Mesozoic reptiles then were largely primitive. Fossils are not only few but also relatively poorly preserved. These primitive bauplans dictate the paucity of difference between genera; it is more difficult to determine the identity of fossils compared to later times. The Early Jurassic was the starting stage of dinosaur evolution. Exposed strata were most developed [ sic ] in southwestern China, for example, Lower Lufeng Group (alas Fengjiahe Formation) of Yunnan, Lower Ziliujing Group of Sichuan, and Daye Group of Tibet. The large amount of dinosaurian and other reptilian fossils preserved in these strata provided strong evidence to determine the chronology these terrestrial strata. Here, we first analyze the fauna of the representative Lower Lufeng Group to demonstrate their primitiveness. Sauropods and prosauropods coexisted in the Lower Lufeng Group. In general, sauropods appeared at the beginning of the Jurassic; thus the existence of sauropod fossils in a stratum would point to its earliest Jurassic age because prosauropods, evolving since the Late Triassic, had much declined with lineages lingering into the Early Jurassic. This phenomenon is particular in Lufeng, Yunnan, where the prosauropod Lufengosaurus described by Professor CC Young coexisted with the primitive sauropod Dachongosaurus yunnanensis , which also showed certain advanced characteristics. In addition to this was Sinosaurus triassicus Young. The holotype teeth were theropodan but referred postcranial skeletal elements were sauropodan. Thus, Sinosaurus was a valid genus, but the specific epithet was inappropriately named. All in all, the coexistence of prosauropods and sauropods makes it reasonable to infer an Early Jurassic age. In addition, the tritylodontid age corroborated [this inference]. Recent research by Cui showed that Yunnania brevirostre was from the Early Jurassic, some characters of which were more advanced than Oligokyphus . Other reptilian fossils of the Lower Lufeng Group include Lukosaurus yini , Tatisaurus oehleri , heterodontosaurs, crocodylomorphs; which had a long temporal range from the Late Triassic to Early Jurassic in general. Accordingly, the Lower Lufeng Group where they were found could be regarded as Early Jurassic. Although the protorosaurid Neotrilosaurus [ sic ] could also be found in the Lower Lufeng Group, protorosaurs were most proliferative in the Permian and Triassic with a few extending to the Jurassic and Cretaceous. Moreover, the Lower Lufeng fossil did not belong to Trilophosaurus , but Neotrilophosaurus , such that its age could definitely be put at Early Jurassic. Similar condition [of coexistence] in Yunnan include that of the primitive sauropod Chinshakiangosaurus zhonghonensis [ sic ] in the Lower Lufeng group above the Daching Group (Yongren) and Lufengosaurus found in the same stratum near Yongren; the primitive sauropod Kunmingosaurus wudingi found in the Lower Lufeng Group at Wuding; and Lufengosaurus and the primitive sauropod Oshanosaurus youngi with the heterodontosaur Dianchungosaurus elegans in the Lower Lufeng Group at Dianchung, Oshan. In the “Pearl deposit” of the Ziliujing Group in Sichuan and Guizhou, primitive sauropods referable to Brachiosauridae were also found together with prosauropods and plesiosaur fossils, for example, Bishanopliosaurus youngi in the Dongyuemiao Group, Bishan, Sichuan. Similar condition [of coexistence] was recently found in the Early Jurassic Daye Group of Changdu, Tibet, where not only the prosauropod Lufengosaurus changduensis was discovered, but also the primitive sauropod Damalasaurus magnus , Megalosaurus tibetensis , Scelidosaurus sp , and at the bottom of the Daye Group, the marine Plesiosaurus changduensis , Ichthyosaurus changduensis and Steneosuchus microobtusidens etc. In summary, Early Jurassic reptilian fauna of China is characterized by the following: (1) the appearance of sauropods marked the beginning of the Jurassic; (2) Early Jurassic prosauropods were an unsuccessful branch of saurischians evolving from the Late Triassic; (3) all carnosaurs were primitive megalosaurs; (4) heterodontosaurs were relatively primitive ornithischians, only existing in the Late Triassic and Early Jurassic; (5) tritylodontids were highly developed in the Early Jurassic; (6) coelurosaurs, plesiosaurs and some mesosuchians were characteristic of Early Jurassic forms. The Early Jurassic terrestrial stratigraphy of China, their degree of development and fossil appearance, is totally correlative to that in other countries, for example, the Red Bed and Cave Sandstone layers of South Africa (Stromberg series), Kota formation of India, Liassic formation of England, Kayenta formation of North America. Except for the controversial age of the South African strata, the others are all Early Jurassic deposits in view of their reptilian, especially dinosaurian, fossils. Since these contemporary fossils are similar to or even co-generic with ours, it is reasonable to place the Lower Lufeng Group and Daye Group etc at Early Jurassic. Middle Jurassic The Middle Jurassic was a transitional period of dinosaur evolution. The most remarkable difference compared with earlier times was the non-existence of prosauropods. Primitive sauropods evolved new characters and became more advanced, but in general retained their primitive appearance, resulting in obviously transitional forms. By this time carnosaurs showed obvious advances: enlarging teeth, reducing forelimbs and stronger vertebral columns; while for coelurosaurs, narrowing of teeth and pneumatization and lightening of the postcranial skeleton. Changes in ornithischians were even more marked, especially that in hypsilophodonts. One quite obvious change in sauropods was that, after certain developments of spatulate teeth, peg-like teeth evolved, the latter being major marker of the beginning of the Middle Jurassic. Stegosaur evolution was quite remarkable in the Middle Jurassic, by when dorsal armor and appendicular bones similar to later forms had evolved. Carnosaurs and coelurosaurs had evolved new forms processing some characteristics present in Late Jurassic forms. Middle Jurassic crocodylomorphs had also evolved, especially the disappearance of primitive “long-snout forms” of the Early Jurassic (with sharper teeth, more flattened and robust torso etc). Observation of fossils revealed that some major characters of Middle Jurassic dinosaurs were different from Late Jurassic forms as well: (1) Middle Jurassic coelurosaurs had smaller teeth; carnosaurs had narrower teeth with more sparse serrations but broader skulls and highly developed forelimbs; (2) sauropods had highly developed vertebral indentations, but “honeycomb septa” had not formed; the neural spines of posterior cervical and dorsal vertebrae were not divided; the fourth trochanter of the femur was still proximally positioned; the pubic notch of ilium was not centrally placed, but more anterior; the ischial notch of ilium was relatively long; the forelimbs [ ?] were not reduced; (3) hypsilophodonts were rare in the Middle Jurassic, but a few iguanodontids had been preserved; (4) stegosaurs evolved relatively quickly and processed obvious transitional characters, as exemplified by the Middle Jurassic stegosaurs in Tibet (plates thin and broad, femoral fourth trochanter unobvious, ischia flat etc). The Middle Jurassic was a time of exchange between primitive and advanced reptiles. New dinosaurs appeared while some early reptiles became extinct, as did the last lineages of tritylodontids. The distribution of Middle Jurassic reptilian fossil-bearing strata in China is regionally restricted, of which the more significant include: (1) Dabuka Group of Tibet – carnosaurs ( Megalosaurus dapukaensis ), coelurosaurs ( Ngexisaurus dapukaensis ), sauropods ( Lancangjiangosaurus cachuensis ), sauropods with primitive peg-like teeth (Microdontosaurus dayensis ), and stegosaurs ( Changdusaurus laminaplacodus ); (2) Hopingxiang Group of Yunnan – Peloneustes kiangchenensis ; (3) Lufeng Group of Yunnan – Plesiochelys oshanensis , Sauropoda indet., Chelonia indet., (4) Lower Shaximiao Group and Upper Ziliujing Group of Sichuan – sauropods ( Bothropodidae indet., Homalosauropodidae indet.), coelurosaurs (Coeluridae indet.), carnosaurs (Megalosauridae indet.) and mesosuchians (Teleosuchidae indet.). The Middle Jurassic reptilian fossils of China are similar to those from the Bajocian, Bathonian and Calovian Stages of England, with some fitting into the same genus and even species. Megalosaurus from China and the English Inferior Oolite Series, for example, are of the same genus, though of different species; while Cetiosaurus form the Great Oolite Series is similar to Lancangjiangosaurus . Anyhow, though the [Middle Jurassic] fossiliferous strata of China are less widely distributed than that of the Late Jurassic, their geologic age is reliably accurate since they could be cross compared with foreign strata. Late Jurassic The Late Jurassic was a time
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Diversity Partitioning During the Cambrian Radiation
    Diversity partitioning during the Cambrian radiation Lin Naa,1 and Wolfgang Kiesslinga,b aGeoZentrum Nordbayern, Paleobiology and Paleoenvironments, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany; and bMuseum für Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute for Research on Evolution and Biodiversity at the Humboldt University Berlin, 10115 Berlin, Germany Edited by Douglas H. Erwin, Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC, and accepted by the Editorial Board March 10, 2015 (received for review January 2, 2015) The fossil record offers unique insights into the environmental and Results geographic partitioning of biodiversity during global diversifica- Raw gamma diversity exhibits a strong increase in the first three tions. We explored biodiversity patterns during the Cambrian Cambrian stages (informally referred to as early Cambrian in this radiation, the most dramatic radiation in Earth history. We as- work) (Fig. 1A). Gamma diversity dropped in Stage 4 and de- sessed how the overall increase in global diversity was partitioned clined further through the rest of the Cambrian. The pattern is between within-community (alpha) and between-community (beta) robust to sampling standardization (Fig. 1B) and insensitive to components and how beta diversity was partitioned among environ- including or excluding the archaeocyath sponges, which are po- ments and geographic regions. Changes in gamma diversity in the tentially oversplit (16). Alpha and beta diversity increased from Cambrian were chiefly driven by changes in beta diversity. The the Fortunian to Stage 3, and fluctuated erratically through the combined trajectories of alpha and beta diversity during the initial following stages (Fig. 2). Our estimate of alpha (and indirectly diversification suggest low competition and high predation within beta) diversity is based on the number of genera in published communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptualising Groundwater Flow Systems at a National (British Mainland) Scale
    Conceptualising groundwater flow systems at a national (British mainland) scale Brighid Ó Dochartaigh and BGS Hydro-JULES team 11 September 2019 Seeking answers to 2 questions: How can an integrated & holistic approach to modelling terrestrial hydrology – including groundwater – improve: 1. Simulation of major flooding events, such as 2013-14 floods? 2. Assessment of water resources under drought conditions? Centre for Ecology & Hydrology | Hydro-JULES Conceptualising groundwater flow systems at a national (British mainland) scale 2 British mainland (WP4.1) 3D Parameterising Deep geological Saturated GW domain – Unsaturated framework Zone code technique Zone code model Conceptual FY18/19 models of groundwater (GW) flow Parameterising Model Sub-surface GW domain – instance code application FY19/20 Results Centre for Ecology & Hydrology | Hydro-JULES Conceptualising groundwater flow systems at a national (British mainland) scale 3 Britain’s diverse geology and hydrogeology Centre for Ecology & Hydrology | Hydro-JULES Conceptualising groundwater flow systems at a national (British mainland) scale 4 3D Geological Framework Model +1.5 km to -15 km 1:625,000 scale mapping Newell 2019 Centre for Ecology & Hydrology | Hydro-JULES Conceptualising groundwater flow systems at a national (British mainland) scale 5 Model includes 3D information from: borehole geology & geophysics; pre-existing cross sections; geological history & structure; seismic data Centre for Ecology & Hydrology | Hydro-JULES Conceptualising groundwater flow systems at a national (British mainland) scale 6 Geology: a physical framework for groundwater flow Centre for Ecology & Hydrology | Hydro-JULES Conceptualising groundwater flow systems at a national (British mainland) scale 7 Key groundwater conceptual model parameters Geology Geography Surface water Groundwater Aquifer Chemistry Flow Aquifer Topographic relief Recharge quantity, Groundwater flow Aquifer properties: e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • MEET the DINOSAURS! WHAT’S in a NAME? a LOT If You Are a Dinosaur!
    MEET THE DINOSAURS! WHAT’S IN A NAME? A LOT if you are a dinosaur! I will call you Dyoplosaurus! Most dinosaurs get their names from the ancient Greek and Latin languages. And I will call you Mojoceratops! And sometimes they are named after a defining feature on their body. Their names are made up of word parts that describe the dinosaur. The name must be sent to a special group of people called the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature to be approved! Did You The word DINOSAUR comes from the Greek word meaning terrible lizard and was first said by Know? Sir Richard Owen in 1841. © 2013 Omaha’s Henry Doorly Zoo & Aquarium® | 3 SEE IF YOU CAN FIND OUT THE MEANING OF SOME OF OUR DINOSAUR’S NAMES. Dinosaur names are not just tough to pronounce, they often have meaning. Dinosaur Name MEANING of Dinosaur Name Carnotaurus (KAR-no-TORE-us) Means “flesh-eating bull” Spinosaurus (SPY-nuh-SORE-us) Dyoplosaurus (die-o-pluh-SOR-us) Amargasaurus (ah-MAR-guh-SORE-us) Omeisaurus (Oh-MY-ee-SORE-us) Pachycephalosaurus (pak-ee-SEF-uh-low-SORE-us) Tuojiangosaurus (toh-HWANG-uh-SORE-us) Yangchuanosaurus (Yang-chew-ON-uh-SORE-us) Quetzalcoatlus (KWET-zal-coe-AT-lus) Ouranosaurus (ooh-RAN-uh-SORE-us) Parasaurolophus (PAIR-uh-so-ROL-uh-PHUS) Kosmoceratops (KOZ-mo-SARA-tops) Mojoceratops (moe-joe-SEH-rah-tops) Triceratops (try-SER-uh-TOPS) Tyrannosaurus rex (tuh-RAN-uh-SORE-us) Find the answers by visiting the Resource Library at Carnotaurus A: www.OmahaZoo.com/Education. Search word: Dinosaurs 4 | © 2013 Omaha’s Henry Doorly Zoo & Aquarium® DINO DEFENSE All animals in the wild have to protect themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • Stegosaurus Scelidosaurus Huayangosaurus Cheeks: No
    Huayangosaurus Scelidosaurus Stegosaurus Cheeks: No reptile has ever had a ‘buccinator’ muscle Answer: highly flexible tongue Brains 0.001% of stegosaur body weight Compared to 1.8% in humans (1000x larger per unit body weight!) Brains Brains Locomotion Graviportal Locomotion Elephantine hind feet (weight-bearing) Shin bones fused with astragalus/ calcaneum Femur: Long compared to humerus Columnar Facultative Tripodality? Stocky forelimbs- could be used for turning/posturing (Bakker) Dermal Armour? Pattern of plates and spines is species-specific Plates paired or staggered (Stegosaurus) Plates were probably not for defense... not tough enough Rotation? Surface markings => symmetrical. Rotation unlikely Potential uses: Thermoregulation? Warm up (ectotherms), Cool down (endotherms) Signaling? positioned for maximal lateral visibility Sexual Selection Mate Recognition Grooves for blood vessels Sexual dimorphism Differences between males and females of the same species **New finding** published in 2015 Stegosaurus Morrison formation, Colorado Dinosaur Sex Figuring out how Stegosaurus even could have mated is a prickly subject. Females were just as well-armored as males, and it is unlikely that males mounted the females from the back. A different technique was necessary. Perhaps they angled so that they faced belly to belly, some have guessed, or maybe, as suggested by Timothy Isles in a recent paper, males faced away from standing females and backed up (a rather tricky maneuver!). The simplest technique yet proposed is that the female lay down on her side and the male approached standing up, thereby avoiding all those plates and spikes. However the Stegosaurus pair accomplished the feat, though, it was most likely brief—only as long as was needed for the exchange of genetic material.
    [Show full text]
  • A. K. Rozhdestvensky HISTORY of the DINOSAUR FAUNA of ASIA
    A. K. Rozhdestvensky HISTORY OF THE DINOSAUR FAUNA OF ASIA AND OTHER CONTINENTS AND QUESTIONS CONCERNING PALEOGEOGRAPHY* The distribution and evolution of dinosaur faunas during the period of their existence, from the Late Triassic to the end of the Cretaceous, shows a close connection with the paleogeography of the Mesozoic. However these questions were hard to examine on a global scale until recently, because only the dinosaurs of North America were well known, where during the last century were found their richest deposits and where the best paleontologists were studying them — J. Leidy, E. Cope, O. Marsh, R. Lull, H. Osborn, C. Gilmore, B. Brown, and later many others. On the remaining continents, including Europe, where the study of dinosaurs started earlier than it did in America, the information was rather incomplete due to the fragmentary condition of the finds and rare, episodic studies. The Asian continent remained unexplored the longest, preventing any intercontinental comparisons. Systematic exploration and large excavations of dinosaur locations in Asia, which began in the last fifty years (Osborn, 1930; Efremov, 1954; Rozhdestvenskiy, 1957a, 1961, 1969, 1971; Rozhdestvenskiy & Chzhou, 1960; Kielan-Jaworowska & Dovchin, 1968; Kurochkin, Kalandadze, & Reshetov, 1970; Barsbold, Voronin, & Zhegallo, 1971) showed that this continent has abundant dinosaur remains, particularly in its central part (Fig. 1). Their study makes it possible to establish a faunal connection between Asia and other continents, correlate the stratigraphy of continental deposits of the Mesozoic, because dinosaurs are reliable leading forms, as well as to make corrections in the existing paleogeographic structure. The latter, in their turn, promote a better understanding of the possible paths of distribution of the individual groups of dinosaurs, the reasons for their appearance, their development, and disappearance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin and Early Evolution of Dinosaurs
    Biol. Rev. (2010), 85, pp. 55–110. 55 doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00094.x The origin and early evolution of dinosaurs Max C. Langer1∗,MartinD.Ezcurra2, Jonathas S. Bittencourt1 and Fernando E. Novas2,3 1Departamento de Biologia, FFCLRP, Universidade de S˜ao Paulo; Av. Bandeirantes 3900, Ribeir˜ao Preto-SP, Brazil 2Laboratorio de Anatomia Comparada y Evoluci´on de los Vertebrados, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales ‘‘Bernardino Rivadavia’’, Avda. Angel Gallardo 470, Cdad. de Buenos Aires, Argentina 3CONICET (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cient´ıficas y T´ecnicas); Avda. Rivadavia 1917 - Cdad. de Buenos Aires, Argentina (Received 28 November 2008; revised 09 July 2009; accepted 14 July 2009) ABSTRACT The oldest unequivocal records of Dinosauria were unearthed from Late Triassic rocks (approximately 230 Ma) accumulated over extensional rift basins in southwestern Pangea. The better known of these are Herrerasaurus ischigualastensis, Pisanosaurus mertii, Eoraptor lunensis,andPanphagia protos from the Ischigualasto Formation, Argentina, and Staurikosaurus pricei and Saturnalia tupiniquim from the Santa Maria Formation, Brazil. No uncontroversial dinosaur body fossils are known from older strata, but the Middle Triassic origin of the lineage may be inferred from both the footprint record and its sister-group relation to Ladinian basal dinosauromorphs. These include the typical Marasuchus lilloensis, more basal forms such as Lagerpeton and Dromomeron, as well as silesaurids: a possibly monophyletic group composed of Mid-Late Triassic forms that may represent immediate sister taxa to dinosaurs. The first phylogenetic definition to fit the current understanding of Dinosauria as a node-based taxon solely composed of mutually exclusive Saurischia and Ornithischia was given as ‘‘all descendants of the most recent common ancestor of birds and Triceratops’’.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Restos Directos De Dinosaurios Terópodos (Excluyendo Aves) En España
    Canudo, J. I. y Ruiz-Omeñaca, J. I. 2003. Ciencias de la Tierra. Dinosaurios y otros reptiles mesozoicos de España, 26, 347-373. LOS RESTOS DIRECTOS DE DINOSAURIOS TERÓPODOS (EXCLUYENDO AVES) EN ESPAÑA CANUDO1, J. I. y RUIZ-OMEÑACA1,2 J. I. 1 Departamento de Ciencias de la Tierra (Área de Paleontología) y Museo Paleontológico. Universidad de Zaragoza. 50009 Zaragoza. [email protected] 2 Paleoymás, S. L. L. Nuestra Señora del Salz, 4, local, 50017 Zaragoza. [email protected] RESUMEN La mayoría de los restos fósiles de dinosaurios terópodos de España son dientes aislados y escasos restos postcraneales. La única excepción es el ornitomimosaurio Pelecanimimus polyodon, del Barremiense de Las Hoyas (Cuenca). Hay registro de terópodos en el Jurásico superior (Oxfordiense superior-Tithónico inferior), en el tránsito Jurásico-Cretácico (Tithónico superior- Berriasiense inferior) y en todos los pisos del Cretácico inferior, con excepción del Valanginiense. En el Cretácico superior únicamente hay restos en el Campaniense y Maastrichtiense. La mayor parte de las determinaciones son demasiado generales, lo que impide conocer algunas de las familias que posiblemente estén representadas. Se han reconocido: Neoceratosauria, Baryonychidae, Ornithomimosauria, Dromaeosauridae, además de terópodos indeterminados, y celurosaurios indeterminados (dientes pequeños sin dentículos). La mayoría de los restos son de Maniraptoriformes, siendo especialmente abundantes los dromeosáuridos. Las únicas excepciones son por el momento, el posible Ceratosauria del Jurásico superior de Asturias, los barionícidos del Hauteriviense-Barremiense de Burgos, Teruel y La Rioja, el posible carcharodontosáurido del Aptiense inferior de Morella y el posible abelisáurido del Campaniense de Laño. Además hay algunos terópodos incertae sedis, como los "paronicodóntidos" (entre los que se incluye Euronychodon), y Richardoestesia.
    [Show full text]
  • Titanosauriform Teeth from the Cretaceous of Japan
    “main” — 2011/2/10 — 15:59 — page 247 — #1 Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (2011) 83(1): 247-265 (Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences) Printed version ISSN 0001-3765 / Online version ISSN 1678-2690 www.scielo.br/aabc Titanosauriform teeth from the Cretaceous of Japan HARUO SAEGUSA1 and YUKIMITSU TOMIDA2 1Museum of Nature and Human Activities, Hyogo, Yayoigaoka 6, Sanda, 669-1546, Japan 2National Museum of Nature and Science, 3-23-1 Hyakunin-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 169-0073, Japan Manuscript received on October 25, 2010; accepted for publication on January 7, 2011 ABSTRACT Sauropod teeth from six localities in Japan were reexamined. Basal titanosauriforms were present in Japan during the Early Cretaceous before Aptian, and there is the possibility that the Brachiosauridae may have been included. Basal titanosauriforms with peg-like teeth were present during the “mid” Cretaceous, while the Titanosauria with peg-like teeth was present during the middle of Late Cretaceous. Recent excavations of Cretaceous sauropods in Asia showed that multiple lineages of sauropods lived throughout the Cretaceous in Asia. Japanese fossil records of sauropods are conformable with this hypothesis. Key words: Sauropod, Titanosauriforms, tooth, Cretaceous, Japan. INTRODUCTION humerus from the Upper Cretaceous Miyako Group at Moshi, Iwaizumi Town, Iwate Pref. (Hasegawa et al. Although more than twenty four dinosaur fossil local- 1991), all other localities provided fossil teeth (Tomida ities have been known in Japan (Azuma and Tomida et al. 2001, Tomida and Tsumura 2006, Saegusa et al. 1998, Kobayashi et al. 2006, Saegusa et al. 2008, Ohara 2008, Azuma and Shibata 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Paleoherpetofauna Portuguesa
    Rev. Esp. Herp. (2002): 17-35 17 Paleoherpetofauna Portuguesa E.G. CRESPO Centro de Biologia Ambiental – Fac. Ciências Univ. Lisboa Resumo: Nos últimos anos a importância da paleoherpetofauna portuguesa tem sido posta em evidência sobre- tudo através do seu grupo mais mediático, os dinossauros. As recentes descobertas em Portugal de vestígios de vários dinossauros, incluindo ossos, ovos, embriões, gastrólitos e pegadas, têm merecido ampla cobertura jorna- lística e têm sido oportunamente acompanhadas por intensas campanhas de divulgação, levadas a cabo pelo Mu- seu Nacional de História Natural de Lisboa, encabeçadas pelo geólogo, Professor Galopim de Carvalho. As pro- longadas e por vezes polémicas acções de sensibilização pública e política que foi necessário empreender para se preservarem muitos dos locais onde esses vestígios foram encontrados, contribuiram também para sustentar e até aumentar o interesse por este grupo de grandes répteis. A importância da paleoherpetofauna portuguesa está porém longe de se limitar apenas aos dinossauros! Em Portugal viveram muitos outros répteis e anfíbios de que existem vestígios desde o começo do Mesozói- co –Quelónios, Crocodilos, Ictiossauros, Plesiossauros, Pterossauros, Lepidossauros, “Estegossauros” e Lis- samphia– que, embora geralmente muito menos conhecidos, têm um significado evolutivo, paleogeográfico e paleoclimático extremamente importante. Na sua descoberta e estudo estiveram envolvidos, já desde o século passado, numerosos investigadores por- tugueses e estrangeiros, dos quais se destacam, entre outros, Georges Zbyszewski, Miguel Telles Antunes, Vei- ga Ferreira, H. Sauvage, A.F. Lapparent, L. Ginsburg, R.Thulborn, P. Galton. Muitos destes estudos encontram- se todavia dispersos por uma vasta gama de publicações em que, frequentemente, as referências aos répteis e aos anfíbios ou são laterais ou são apresentadas em contextos zoológicos mais abrangentes, pelo que, como parece que tem acontecido, têm passado praticamente despercebidos à maioria daqueles que se dedicam aos estudo da nossa herpetofauna actual.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Sauropodomorph Ichnogenus from the Lower Jurassic of Sichuan, China Fills a Gap in the Track Record
    Historical Biology An International Journal of Paleobiology ISSN: 0891-2963 (Print) 1029-2381 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ghbi20 A new sauropodomorph ichnogenus from the Lower Jurassic of Sichuan, China fills a gap in the track record Lida Xing, Martin G. Lockley, Jianping Zhang, Hendrik Klein, Daqing Li, Tetsuto Miyashita, Zhongdong Li & Susanna B. Kümmell To cite this article: Lida Xing, Martin G. Lockley, Jianping Zhang, Hendrik Klein, Daqing Li, Tetsuto Miyashita, Zhongdong Li & Susanna B. Kümmell (2016) A new sauropodomorph ichnogenus from the Lower Jurassic of Sichuan, China fills a gap in the track record, Historical Biology, 28:7, 881-895, DOI: 10.1080/08912963.2015.1052427 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08912963.2015.1052427 Published online: 24 Jun 2015. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 95 View related articles View Crossmark data Citing articles: 2 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ghbi20 Download by: [University of Alberta] Date: 23 October 2016, At: 09:07 Historical Biology, 2016 Vol. 28, No. 7, 881–895, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08912963.2015.1052427 A new sauropodomorph ichnogenus from the Lower Jurassic of Sichuan, China fills a gap in the track record Lida Xinga*, Martin G. Lockleyb, Jianping Zhanga, Hendrik Kleinc, Daqing Lid, Tetsuto Miyashitae, Zhongdong Lif and Susanna B. Ku¨mmellg aSchool of the Earth Sciences and Resources, China University
    [Show full text]
  • Dinosaurs British Isles
    DINOSAURS of the BRITISH ISLES Dean R. Lomax & Nobumichi Tamura Foreword by Dr Paul M. Barrett (Natural History Museum, London) Skeletal reconstructions by Scott Hartman, Jaime A. Headden & Gregory S. Paul Life and scene reconstructions by Nobumichi Tamura & James McKay CONTENTS Foreword by Dr Paul M. Barrett.............................................................................10 Foreword by the authors........................................................................................11 Acknowledgements................................................................................................12 Museum and institutional abbreviations...............................................................13 Introduction: An age-old interest..........................................................................16 What is a dinosaur?................................................................................................18 The question of birds and the ‘extinction’ of the dinosaurs..................................25 The age of dinosaurs..............................................................................................30 Taxonomy: The naming of species.......................................................................34 Dinosaur classification...........................................................................................37 Saurischian dinosaurs............................................................................................39 Theropoda............................................................................................................39
    [Show full text]
  • Implications for Predatory Dinosaur Macroecology and Ontogeny in Later Late Cretaceous Asiamerica
    Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Theropod Guild Structure and the Tyrannosaurid Niche Assimilation Hypothesis: Implications for Predatory Dinosaur Macroecology and Ontogeny in later Late Cretaceous Asiamerica Journal: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Manuscript ID cjes-2020-0174.R1 Manuscript Type: Article Date Submitted by the 04-Jan-2021 Author: Complete List of Authors: Holtz, Thomas; University of Maryland at College Park, Department of Geology; NationalDraft Museum of Natural History, Department of Geology Keyword: Dinosaur, Ontogeny, Theropod, Paleocology, Mesozoic, Tyrannosauridae Is the invited manuscript for consideration in a Special Tribute to Dale Russell Issue? : © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 1 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 1 Theropod Guild Structure and the Tyrannosaurid Niche Assimilation Hypothesis: 2 Implications for Predatory Dinosaur Macroecology and Ontogeny in later Late Cretaceous 3 Asiamerica 4 5 6 Thomas R. Holtz, Jr. 7 8 Department of Geology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 USA 9 Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC 20013 USA 10 Email address: [email protected] 11 ORCID: 0000-0002-2906-4900 Draft 12 13 Thomas R. Holtz, Jr. 14 Department of Geology 15 8000 Regents Drive 16 University of Maryland 17 College Park, MD 20742 18 USA 19 Phone: 1-301-405-4084 20 Fax: 1-301-314-9661 21 Email address: [email protected] 22 23 1 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 2 of 91 24 ABSTRACT 25 Well-sampled dinosaur communities from the Jurassic through the early Late Cretaceous show 26 greater taxonomic diversity among larger (>50kg) theropod taxa than communities of the 27 Campano-Maastrichtian, particularly to those of eastern/central Asia and Laramidia.
    [Show full text]