Advances in Water Resources 30 (2007) 1528–1546 www.elsevier.com/locate/advwatres
Laboratory, field, and modeling studies of bioaugmentation of butane-utilizing microorganisms for the in situ cometabolic treatment of 1,1-dichloroethene, 1,1-dichloroethane, and 1,1,1-trichloroethane
Lewis Semprini a,*, Mark E. Dolan a, Maureen A. Mathias a, Gary D. Hopkins b, Perry L. McCarty b a Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, Oregon State University, Apperson Hall 202, Corvallis, OR 97331-2302, United States b Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, United States
Received 29 July 2005; received in revised form 10 April 2006; accepted 5 May 2006 Available online 18 September 2006
Abstract
A series of laboratory, field, and modeling studies were performed evaluating the potential for in situ aerobic cometabolism of chlo- rinated aliphatic hydrocarbon (CAH) mixtures, including 1,1,1-trichloroethane (1,1,1-TCA), 1,1-dichloroethane (1,1-DCA) and 1,1- dichloroethene (1,1-DCE) by bioaugmented microorganisms that grew on butane. A butane-grown bioaugmentation culture, primarily comprised of a Rhodococcus sp., was developed that effectively transformed mixtures of the three CAHs, under subsurface nutrient con- ditions. Microcosm experiments and modeling studies showed rapid transformation of 1,1-DCE with high transformation product tox- icity and weak inhibition by butane, while 1,1,1-TCA was much more slowly transformed and strongly inhibited by butane. Field studies were conducted in the saturated zone at the Moffett Field In-Situ Test Facility in California. In the bioaugmented test leg, 1,1-DCE was most effectively transformed, followed by 1,1-DCA, and 1,1,1-TCA, consistent with the results from the laboratory studies. A 1-D reac- tive/transport code simulated the field responses during the early stages of testing (first 20 days), with the following extents of removal achieved at the first monitoring well; 1,1-DCE ( 97%), 1,1-DCA ( 77%), and 1,1,1-TCA ( 36%), with little or no CAH transformation observed beyond the first monitoring well. As time proceeded, decreased performance was observed. The modeling analysis indicated that this loss of performance may have been associated with 1,1-DCE transformation toxicity combined with the limited addition of butane as a growth substrate with longer pulse cycles. When shorter pulse cycles were reinitiated after 40 days of operation, 1,1-DCE transformation was restored and the following transformation extents were achieved; 1,1-DCE ( 94%), 1,1-DCA ( 8%), and 1,1,1- TCA ( 0%), with some CAH transformation occurring past the first monitoring well. Modeling analysis of this period indicated that the bioaugmented culture was likely not the dominant butane-utilizing microorganism present. This was consistent with observations in the indigenous leg during this period that showed effective butane utilization and the following extents of transformation: 1,1- DCE ( 86 %), 1,1-DCA ( 5%), and 1,1,1-TCA ( 0%). The combination of lab and field scale studies and supporting modeling provide a means of evaluating the performance of bioaugmentation and the cometabolic treatment of CAH mixtures. 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Cometabolism; Modeling; Field tests; Bioaugmentation; Butane; 1,1-Dichloroethene, 1,1-Dichloroethane; 1,1,1-Trichloroethane; Inhibition; Transformation toxicity; CAH mixtures
1. Introduction
In situ aerobic cometabolism has been shown to be a method for reducing groundwater contamination with * Corresponding author. Fax: +1 541 7373099. chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons (CAHs) [26,12,21]. E-mail address: [email protected] (L. Semprini). Cometabolic transformation results from non-specific
0309-1708/$ - see front matter 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2006.05.017 L. Semprini et al. / Advances in Water Resources 30 (2007) 1528–1546 1529
Nomenclature
Parameter Definition X cell concentration on a pore volume basis (mg/L) KIc,DCE,BUT competitive inhibition constant of 1,1-DCE X0 initial cell concentration on a pore volume basis on butane (mg/L) (mg/L) KIc,DCA,BUT competitive inhibition constant of 1,1- Y cell yield (mg cells/mg butane) DCA on butane (mg/L) b cell decay coefficient (d 1) KIc,TCA,BUT competitive inhibition constant of 1,1,1- Fa stoichiometric ratio of oxygen to butane for bio- TCA on butane (mg/L) mass synthesis (mg O2/mg butane) KIc,DCE,DCA competitive inhibition constant of 1,1-DCE VL liquid volume (L) on 1,1-DCA (mg/L) VG gas volume (L) 1 KIc,DCE,TCA competitive inhibition constant of 1,1-DCE Kla overall gas/liquid mass transfer coefficient (d ) on 1,1,1-TCA (mg/L) km DCE maximum transformation rate of 1,1-DCE (mg KIc,DCA,DCE competitive inhibition constant of 1,1- 1,1-DCE/mg cells-d) DCA on 1,1-DCE (mg/L) km DCA maximum transformation rate of 1,1-DCA (mg KIc,DCA,TCA competitive inhibition constant of 1,1- 1,1-DCA/mg cells-d) DCA on 1,1,1-TCA (mg/L) km TCA maximum transformation rate of 1,1,1-TCA KIc,TCA,DCE competitive inhibition constant of 1,1,1- (mg 1,1,1-TCA/mg cells-d) TCA on 1,1-DCE (mg/L) km BUT maximum utilization rate of butane (mg butane/ KIc,TCA,DCA competitive inhibition constant of 1,1,1- mg cell-d) TCA on 1,1-DCA (mg/L) C aqueous substrate concentration (mg/L) KIc,BUT,DCE competitive inhibition constant of butane Ks DCE half-saturation constant of 1,1-DCE (mg/L) on 1,1-DCE (mg/L) Ks DCA half-saturation constant of 1,1-DCA (mg/L) KIc,BUT,DCA competitive inhibition constant of butane Ks TCA half-saturation constant of 1,1,1-TCA (mg/L) on 1,1-DCA (mg/L) Ks BUT half-saturation constant of butane (mg/L) KIc,BUT,TCA competitive inhibition constant of butane Tc DCE transformation capacity of 1,1-DCE (mg 1,1- on 1,1,1-TCA (mg/L) DCE/mg cells) KIu,BUT,DCE non-competitive inhibition constant of bu- Tc DCA transformation capacity of 1,1-DCA (mg 1,1- tane on 1,1-DCE (mg/L) DCA/mg cells) KIu,BUT,DCA non-competitive inhibition constant of bu- Tc TCA transformation capacity of 1,1,1-TCA (mg tane on 1,1-DCA (mg/L) 1,1,1-TCA/mg cells) * KIu,BUT,TCA non-competitive inhibition constant of bu- C sorbed phase substrate concentration (mg sub- tane on 1,1,1-TCA (mg/L) strate/kg soil) 2 Hcc,DCE dimensionless Henrys constant for 1,1-DCE Dh hydrodynamic dispersion coefficient (m /d) 1 Hcc,DCA dimensionless Henrys constant for 1,1-DCA Fk mass transfer rate coefficient for sorption (d ) Hcc,TCA dimensionless Henrys constant for 1,1,1-TCA v average linear groundwater velocity (m/d) Hcc,BUT dimensionless Henrys constant for butane Kd partition coefficient for sorption (L/kg) fd fraction of cells that are biodegradable (mg/mg) U porosity dc cell decay oxygen demand (mg O2/mg cell) qb bulk density of the aquifer solids (kg/L)
enzymes fortuitously catalyzing these reactions. Because Microorganisms that grow on butane have the ability to these reactions do not provide energy or carbon, a primary cometabolize a broad range of CAHs [9,8,15,14]. Microor- growth substrate must be supplied to stimulate the neces- ganisms stimulated on butane are capable of transform- sary population of cometabolizing microorganisms. In oxi- ing 1,1-dichloroethene (1,1-DCE), 1,1-dichloroethane dative cometabolism, the enzymes use the primary growth (1,1-DCA), and 1,1,1-trichloroethane (1,1,1-TCA) [17]. substrate as an electron donor and oxygen as an electron Kim et al. [16,17] performed detailed kinetic and inhibition acceptor. studies on the cometabolic transformation of these three The performance of cultures capable of cometabolic oxi- CAHs with a butane-grown enrichment culture. 1,1-DCE dative dechlorination has been studied for a variety of con- was observed to have the fastest transformation kinetics, taminants and primary growth substrates as reviewed by followed by 1,1-DCA, and 1,1,1-TCA. Inhibition models Arp et al. [4] and Alvarez-Cohen and Speitel [2]. Examples were also determined for butane inhibition on CAH trans- of monooxygenase-inducing substrates include methane, formation, CAH inhibition on butane utilization, and propane, ammonia, toluene, and phenol [9,8,3,5]. CAH inhibition on each others’ transformation. These 1530 L. Semprini et al. / Advances in Water Resources 30 (2007) 1528–1546 inhibitions play an important role in application of comet- substrate, PR1301 did not maintain TCE degradative ability abolic transformations and are incorporated into our for long periods. model development. A microcosm study with the butane-enrichment culture Glotz et al. [7] reviewed models for cometabolism, of Kim et al. [16] was conducted by Jitnuyanont et al. [13] including transport models and the use of models in the to study the transformation of 1,1,1-TCA in bioaugmented design of remediation systems. The modeling of cometab- and non-augmented microcosms. The augmented micro- olism both in batch systems and transport codes involves cosms required less time to start utilization of butane than the incorporation of processes including microbial growth non-augmented microcosms and initially were more effec- and decay, substrate utilization as an electron donor, oxy- tive in transforming 1,1,1-TCA, but their transformation gen utilization as an electron acceptor, and the transfor- ability decreased with prolonged incubation. mation of the CAHs of interest. The multi-species The objectives of our study were to: (1) develop a culture reactive transport models must also include key cometa- for bioaugmentation from a parent culture that had been bolic processes including the kinetics of different inhibi- kinetically well characterized by Kim et al. [16,17]; (2) eval- tions, as well as transformation product toxicity that uate the culture’s ability to transform 1,1-DCE, 1,1-DCA, can result from the transformation of the CAHs. Such and 1,1,1-TCA in batch kinetic studies performed in both models have been used to evaluate the results of field scale media and groundwater microcosms; (3) simulate the tests experiments [27,28,6]. of the media and microcosm studies using a cometabolic Few studies have been performed, where cometabolic transformation model, using as many independently models have been applied at different scales, including derived parameters as possible; (4) perform a field scale batch kinetic laboratory studies in media or soil/groundwa- bioaugmentation experiment using the culture, and evalu- ter microcosm studies, column studies and field scale tests. ate the transformation of the CAH mixture; and (5) simu- Gandhi et al. [6] performed two-dimensional time-variant late the results of the field experiment using a reactive model simulations of a full-scale recirculation system at transport model that includes cometabolic kinetics, using Edwards Field, California, to evaluate in situ cometabolic kinetic parameters that were independently determined in treatment of trichloroethene (TCE) with microorganisms laboratory studies. For simulating the results of the field stimulated on toluene. Models simulations were performed test, a multi-species reactive transport model was adapted using estimated kinetic parameters and those determined from that presented by Semprini and McCarty [27,28],to directly from microcosm studies using site groundwater include terms of transformation product toxicity and com- and aquifer solids. The parameters included the growth petitive and mixed inhibition of butane and the chlorinated yield, the endogenous decay coefficient, the maximum spe- solvent, as described by Kim et al. [16,17]. cific primary substrate utilization rate, TCE transforma- The ultimate goal of the study was to evaluate bioaug- tion rate, TCE transformation product toxicity, and mentation at the field scale. The Moffett Field test facility competitive inhibition between toluene and TCE. TCE had been previously used for field scale evaluation of removals based on model simulations closely simulated in situ cometabolism of TCE, c-DCE, trans-dichloroethene those observed in the field demonstration. (t-DCE), and VC with methane [25], phenol [11] and tolu- In our study we evaluated the potential for bioaugmen- ene [12] added as cometabolic substrates. Methane utilizers tation of a butane-utilizing culture to achieve effective effectively transformed VC, and t-DCE, but were less effec- transformation of mixtures of 1,1-DCE, 1,1-DCA, and tive in transforming c-DCE, and TCE. Phenol utilizers and 1,1,1-TCA. The goal of this approach is to achieve pro- toluene utilizers effectively transformed TCE, c-DCE, and longed survival and growth of the added organisms that VC, and were less effective at transforming 1,1-DCE and are more effective than the indigenous microorganisms in t-DCE. 1,1,1-TCA present as a background contaminant transforming the target contaminants. In situ bioaugmen- was not effectively transformed by any of these cometabolic tation with specialized cometabolizing microorganisms systems. In addition, 1,1-DCE strongly inhibited the trans- has been previously evaluated. Burkholderia cepacia formation of TCE by microorganisms grown on toluene ENV435, a toluene-utilizing microorganism, was bioaug- [12]. mented into groundwater contaminated with 1000–2500 Our study investigated the transformation of 1,1-DCA, lg/L of TCE, 1,2-cis-dichloroethene (c-DCE), and vinyl 1,1-DCE and 1,1,1-TCA – three CAHs that are frequently chloride (VC). The total mass of CAHs in the treated area found together due to biotic and abiotic transformation of was reduced by as much as 78% within 2 days, after inject- the latter into the former two, respectively [30]. Kim et al. ing the organisms [29]. A genetically modified strain of B. [16,17] conducted detailed kinetic studies with a butane- cepacia G4, PR1301, that can degrade TCE effectively while utilizing enrichment, which was the parent culture for this growing on simple substrates such as lactate, instead of study. Inhibition types were determined and kinetic para- phenol or toluene, was bioaugmented into small scale lab- meters for butane utilization, 1,1,1-TCA, 1,1-DCE, and oratory columns [23,22]. The results indicated that the 1,1-DCA transformation, and inhibition constants were biaugmented organisms were present in column effluents developed. Table 1 presents the maximum utilization rate as long as bioaugmentation continued, but not when it constants (km) and half-saturation constants (Ks) that were was discontinued. When lactate was used as a primary determined. The culture transformed 1,1-DCE at the high- L. Semprini et al. / Advances in Water Resources 30 (2007) 1528–1546 1531
Table 1 Input parameters for modeling biotransformation in media, microcosm and field experiments Parameter Units Value Parameter Units Value a d KIc,DCA,BUT mg/L 39.9 X0 mg/L 85 e X0 mg/L Varied c X0 mg/L Varied a a KIc,DCA,DCE mg/L 1.8 Y mg/mg 0.79 a 1 a KIc,DCA,TCA mg/L 1.6 b d 0.038 b d 1 0.084b a 1 c KIc,DCE,BUT mg/L 0.84 b d 0.1 c Fa mg/mg 4.0 a d KIc,DCE,DCA mg/L 0.35 VL L 0.017 a d KIc,DCE,TCA mg/L 0.11 VG L 0.010 e VL L 0.40 e VG L 0.27 1 e Kla d 0.72 a KIc,TCA,BUT mg/L 41.8 km BUT mg/mg-d 3.49 a a KIc,TCA,DCA mg/L 1.3 km DCA mg/mg-d 1.16 a a KIc,TCA,DCE mg/L 2.3 km DCE mg/mg-d 6.52 a km TCA mg/mg-d 0.64 a KIu,BUT,DCA mg/L 0.20 b a 0.023 Ks BUT mg/L 1.11 a a KIu,BUT,DCE mg/L 0.40 Ks DCA mg/L 1.90 a a KIu,BUT,TCA mg/L 0.03 Ks DCE mg/L 0.14 a Ks TCA mg/L 1.63 a KIc,BUT,DCE mg/L 0.02 a Tc DCA mg/mg 0.197 a Hcc DCA – 0.18 Tc DCE mg/mg 0.050 b Hcc DCE – 0.86 0.017 b Hcc TCA – 0.55 Tc TCA mg/mg 0.069 b Hcc BUT –38 0.110 c fd mg/mg 0.8 c dc mg/mg 1.42 a Value from [17] and used to model media, microcosm, and field tests unless specified otherwise. b Value adjusted to better fit media reactor data and used to model microcosm and field tests. c Value used in reactive transport model. d Value used for media reactors. e Value used for simulations of microcosms with aquifer solids. est rate, followed by 1,1-DCA, and 1,1,1-TCA. The Kim et al. [16,17] determined the types of inhibition dur- Ks value for 1,1-DCE was also much lower than for ing cometabolism by the butane-enrichment culture that 1,1-DCA, and 1,1,1-TCA, which also resulted in more was the parent culture tested in this study. Competitive, rapid transformation at lower concentrations, and less non-competitive, and mixed inhibition, was observed. inhibition of transformation by butane and the other Competitive inhibition among the CAHs when mixtures CAHs. The culture had a higher km value for 1,1-DCE were present is represented by, and a lower Ks value than cultures that grew on methane dC XkmC or ammonia, indicating it was much more effective at ¼ ð1Þ dt K ðÞþ1 þ I =K C 1,1-DCE transformation [17]. The transformation capacity s c Ic (Tc DCE) of 1,1-DCE, which is the amount of CAH trans- where C is the aqueous concentration of the substrate (mg/ formed for the amount cells present, was also shown to be L), Ic is the aqueous concentration of inhibitor (mg/L); KIc is high for this culture [15]. the constant for competitive inhibition (mg inhibitor/L); km is the substrate maximum specific utilization rate (mg sub- 2. Model development strate/mg cells/day); and Ks is the substrate half-saturation constant (mg substrate/L). Kim et al. [17] found that the An aerobic cometabolism model was developed that measured Ks values for transformation of the CAHs, repre- includes substrate and CAH inhibition models for the sented the inhibition constant, Ic, well for the inhibition by butane-enrichment culture along with transformation one CAH on the transformation of another CAH or butane. product toxicity, as described by Kim et al. [17]. For labo- Non-competitive inhibition more specifically influences the maximum utilization rate, ratory batch reactor studies, the series of equations for ! microbial growth and decay, butane utilization, and trans- dC Xk C formation of CAHs was solved using Stella software ¼ m ð2Þ Ks dt 1 þ Iu=KIu (High Performance System Inc., Hanover, NH). 1þIu=KIuþC 1532 L. Semprini et al. / Advances in Water Resources 30 (2007) 1528–1546