Bioremediation, Biostimulation and Bioaugmention: a Review

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bioremediation, Biostimulation and Bioaugmention: a Review International Journal of Environmental Bioremediation & Biodegradation, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 1, 28-39 Available online at http://pubs.sciepub.com/ijebb/3/1/5 © Science and Education Publishing DOI:10.12691/ijebb-3-1-5 Bioremediation, Biostimulation and Bioaugmention: A Review Godleads Omokhagbor Adams1,*, Prekeyi Tawari Fufeyin1, Samson Eruke Okoro2, Igelenyah Ehinomen1 1Department of Animal and Environmental Biology, University of Benin, Edo State Nigeria 2Department of Biochemistry, University of Port Harcourt, Rivers State Nigeria *Corresponding author: [email protected] Received February 21, 2015; Revised February 28, 2015; Accepted March 05, 2015 Abstract Bioremediation uses microbial metabolism in the presence of optimum environmental conditions and sufficient nutrients to breakdown contaminants notably petroleum hydrocarbons. We reviewed technologies for carrying out bioremediation and observed that biotechnological approaches that are designed to carry out remediation have received a great deal of attention in recent years. Biostimulation (meaning the addition of limiting nutrients to support microbial growth) and Bioaugmentation (meaning the addition of living cells capable of degradation) studies have enjoyed a heavy presence in literature and reviews of these technologies focusing on the technical aspects are very few if at all available. At times, nutrient application alone or augmenting with microbes is not sufficient enough for remediation leading to a simultaneous approach. Recent studies show that a combination of both approaches is equally feasible but not explicitly more beneficial. Evidently, selection of a technology hinges on site specific requirements such as availability of microorganisms capable of degradation in sufficient quantities, nutrient availability to support microbial growth and proliferation as well as environmental parameters such as temperature in combination with duration of exposure. This review focuses on these technologies and efforts are directed towards eventual manipulation of the processes of remediation all geared towards making bioremediation technically and economically viable for comprehensive treatment of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated soils. Keywords: Bioremediation, Biostimulation, Bioaugmentation, combined technologies Cite This Article: Godleads Omokhagbor Adams, Prekeyi Tawari Fufeyin, Samson Eruke Okoro, and Igelenyah Ehinomen, “Bioremediation, Biostimulation and Bioaugmention: A Review.” International Journal of Environmental Bioremediation & Biodegradation, vol. 3, no. 1 (2015): 28-39. doi: 10.12691/ijebb-3-1-5. ecosystems, such as the spills experienced in the Niger Delta region in Nigeria because of the remoteness of the 1. Introduction sites or the bottle necks hindering emergency environmental responses. There is a growing concern about the rate of The effects of oil contamination are enormous. Oil environmental degradation currently experienced throughout penetrates into the structure of the plumage of birds and the world today, much of it arising from growing the fur of mammals, reducing their insulating ability, and production and use of fossil fuels. In all continents, oil making them more vulnerable to temperature fluctuations exploration and use threatens the health of the and much less buoyant in water. Animals that rely on environment and living creatures including humans. An scent to find their babies or mothers fade away due to the oil spill is the release of a petroleum hydrocarbon into the strong scent of the oil. This causes babies to be rejected or environment. Oil spills may be due to releases of crude oil abandoned, leaving the babies to starve and eventually die from tankers, offshore platforms, drilling rigs and wells, (Hogan, 2008). Oil can impair a bird's ability to fly, as well as spills of refined petroleum products (such as preventing it from foraging or escaping from predators. As gasoline, diesel) and their by-products, heavier fuels used they preen, birds may ingest the oil coating their feathers, by large ships such as bunker fuel, or the spill of any oily irritating the digestive tract, altering liver function, and refuse or waste oil. causing kidney damage. Together with their diminished Crude oil and refined fuel spills have damaged natural foraging capacity, this can rapidly result in dehydration ecosystems in Alaska, the Gulf of Mexico, the Galapagos and metabolic imbalance. Some birds exposed to Islands, France, the Niger Delta region in Nigeria and petroleum also experience changes in their hormonal many other places worldwide. The quantity of oil spilled balance, including changes in their luteinizing protein. during accidents has ranged from a few hundred tons to The majority of birds affected by oil spills die without several hundred thousand tons (e.g., Deepwater Horizon human intervention. Some studies have suggested that less Oil Spill, Atlantic Empress, Amoco Cadiz) but it is a than one percent of oil-soaked birds survive, even after limited barometer of damage or impact. Smaller spills cleaning (Dunnet, et al., 1982) have also ready proven to have a great impact on International Journal of Environmental Bioremediation & Biodegradation 29 For humans an oil spill can represent an immediate fire Unterman, 1993).Bioremediation is a process which uses hazard. The Kuwaiti oil fires produced air pollution that microorganisms and their products to remove caused respiratory distress. The Deepwater Horizon contaminants from the soil (USEPA 2000, 2012; Leung explosion killed eleven oil rig workers. The fire resulting 2004). In particular, native soil rnicroorganisms play a key from the Lac-Mégantic derailment killed forty seven and role in soil bioremediationas biogeochemical agents to destroyed half of the town's centre, In Ikarama, Bayelsa transform complex organic compounds into simple inorganic State, Nigeria, a spill resulted in fire and subsequent compounds or into their constituent elements. This burning of at least fifty personnel on the work platform process is termed mineralization. The microorganisms are (SPDC, 2011). adsorbed to soil particles by the mechanism of ionic Spilled oil can also contaminate drinking water supplies. exchange. In general soil particles have a negative charge, For example, in 2013 two different oil spills contaminated and soil and bacteria can hold together by an ionic bond water supplies for three hundred thousand people in Miri, involving polyvalent cations (Killham, 1994). Malaysia; Eighty thousand people in Coca, Ecuador. In Bioremediation technology uses microorganisms to 2000, springs were contaminated by an oil spill in Clark reduce, eliminate, contain, or transform to benign contaminants County, Kentucky (Campbell Robertson /Clifford Krauss, present in soils, sediments, water, and air. 2010). Bioremediation is described as the use of microorganisms Contamination can have an economic impact on to destroy or immobilize waste materials (Shanahan, tourism and marine resource extraction industries. For 2004). This process of detoxification targets the harmful example, the Deepwater Horizon oil spill impacted beach chemicals by mineralization, transformation, or alteration tourism and fishing along the Gulf Coast, and the (Shannon and Unterman, 1993). For centuries, civilizations responsible parties were required to compensate economic have used natural bioremediation in wastewater treatment, victims (Yang 2009). but intentional use for the reduction of hazardous wastes is Based on available literature (Adams et al, 2014), oil a more recent development. contamination reduces the ability of soil to support the Bioremediation involves the production of energy in a growth of plants, seeps into ground to contaminate ground redox reaction within microbial cells. These reactions water, and increases the presence of heavy metals which include respiration and other biological functions needed can bioaccumulate and biomagnify causing adverse health for cell maintenance and reproduction. A delivery system effects. It is well known that heavy metals can be that provides one or more of the following is generally extremely toxic as they damage nerves, liver and bones, required: an energy source (electron donor), an electron and also block functional groups of vital enzymes (Moore, acceptor, and nutrients. Different types of microbial 1990; Ewan and Pamphlett, 1996). Some of the metals electron acceptor classes can be involved in like Nickel are also listed as possible human carcinogens bioremediation, such as oxygen-, nitrate-, manganese-, (group 2B) and associated with reproductive problems and iron (III)-, sulfate-, or carbon dioxide-reducing, and their birth defects. Besides, a range of detrimental effects on corresponding redox potentials. Redox potentials provide fauna and flora are also well documented. Often, these an indication of the relative dominance of the electron contaminants also inhibit biological remediation processes acceptor classes. due to metal sensitivity of the strain and necessitate The presence of microorganisms with the appropriate additional combat strategies for efficient operation (Malik, metabolic capabilities is the most important requirement 2000; Malik et al., 2001). for oil spill bioremediation according to Venosa et al, The challenge facing scientists and industrialists alike (2001). The communities which are exposed to today is tackling this problem of environmental degradation in hydrocarbons become adapted, exhibiting selective a safe, environmentally sound
Recommended publications
  • Bioaugmentation: an Emerging Strategy of Industrial Wastewater Treatment for Reuse and Discharge
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Review Bioaugmentation: An Emerging Strategy of Industrial Wastewater Treatment for Reuse and Discharge Alexis Nzila 1,*, Shaikh Abdur Razzak 2 and Jesse Zhu 3 1 Department of Life Sciences, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM), P.O. Box 468, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia 2 Department of Chemical Engineering, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM), Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia; [email protected] 3 Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 5B9, Canada; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +966-13-860-7716; Fax: +966-13-860-4277 Academic Editors: Rao Bhamidiammarri and Kiran Tota-Maharaj Received: 12 May 2016; Accepted: 9 July 2016; Published: 25 August 2016 Abstract: A promising long-term and sustainable solution to the growing scarcity of water worldwide is to recycle and reuse wastewater. In wastewater treatment plants, the biodegradation of contaminants or pollutants by harnessing microorganisms present in activated sludge is one of the most important strategies to remove organic contaminants from wastewater. However, this approach has limitations because many pollutants are not efficiently eliminated. To counterbalance the limitations, bioaugmentation has been developed and consists of adding specific and efficient pollutant-biodegrading microorganisms into a microbial community in an effort to enhance the ability of this microbial community to biodegrade contaminants. This approach has been tested for wastewater cleaning with encouraging results, but failure has also been reported, especially during scale-up. In this review, work on the bioaugmentation in the context of removal of important pollutants from industrial wastewater is summarized, with an emphasis on recalcitrant compounds, and strategies that can be used to improve the efficiency of bioaugmentation are also discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioaugmentation of Chlorinated Solvents
    BIOAUGMENTATION FOR REMEDIATION OF CHLORINATED SOLVENTS: TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT, STATUS, AND RESEARCH NEEDS October 2005 GeoSyntec Consultants TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ...........................................................................................................................................III LIST OF FIGURES .........................................................................................................................................III ACRONYMNS AND ABBREVIATIONS........................................................................................................V FOREWORD...................................................................................................................................................VII EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................... IX 1. INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................................1 2. EARLY DEVELOPMENT OF BIOAUGMENTATION.............................................................................5 3. RECENT PROGRESS IN CHLORINATED SOLVENT BIOREMEDIATION .....................................13 4. DEHALORESPIRATION: THE KEY PROCESS UNDERLYING CURRENT BIOAUGMENTATION PRACTICES..............................................................................................................................................................19 4.1 THE UBIQUITY CONCEPT REVISITED
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Methods
    Biological Methods Jerry Walsh, Jenna Bishop, Quinn Albertson, Shane Galloway, Carlos Rivera, Tom Devenney, Jeff Green Physical Mechanisms In Situ Methods Permeable Reactive Barriers Biostimulation Bioaugmentation Phytoremediation Permeable Reactive Barriers (Biobarriers) • Semi-permeable reactive media in flow path • Chemically or biologically-mediated reactions transform contaminants into non-toxic or immobile products • Hydrocarbons need to be oxidized • Chlorinated solvents and nitrate need to be reduced • Microorganisms help mediate redox reactions to gain energy and materials for synthesis Reactive Media Reactive Medium Removal Mechanism Contaminants Removed Organic Material Microbial sulfate reduction Acid mine drainage and precipitation Organic Material Microbial nitrate reduction Nitrate Oxygen/Nitrate-Releasing Microbial degradation BTEX Compounds Resting-State Microbial cometabolism Chlorinated aliphatics Microorganisms Oxidative Biodegradation • To respire electrons removed from contaminants, need electron acceptors Aerobic: • Aerobic methods Molecular Oxygen Anaerobic: • Anaerobic methods Nutrients (nitrate, sulfates, CO2, ferric iron, metal oxides, etc) • Aerobic methods are generally preferred to provide more energy to the microbes • Biochemical oxygen demands (BOD’s) often exceed available oxygen, so adding oxygen to the system can stimulate oxidative biodegradation Reductive Biodegradation • Electron donors are required, which anaerobic environments more abundantly produce • Organic matter is a well-suited electron donor for this process • This method works well for TCE, hexavalent chromium, sulfate, and nitrate contamination • Heterotrophic denitrification to remove nitrate Biostimulation • Modification of environment to stimulate existing bacteria capable of bioremediation. • Only works if correct bacteria are present. • Often done through use of phosphorous, nitrogen, carbon, and oxygen. • Chemicals usually added through injection wells. • EPA approved method. Advantages • Low Costs • Can be tailored to the specific site conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Selecting Bacteria Candidates for the Bioaugmentation of Activated Sludge to Improve the Aerobic Treatment of Landfill Leachate
    water Article Selecting Bacteria Candidates for the Bioaugmentation of Activated Sludge to Improve the Aerobic Treatment of Landfill Leachate Justyna Michalska *, Artur Pi ´nski , Joanna Zur˙ and Agnieszka Mrozik Institute of Biology, Biotechnology and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Silesia, Jagiello´nska28, 40-032 Katowice, Poland; [email protected] (A.P.); [email protected] (J.Z.);˙ [email protected] (A.M.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 6 November 2019; Accepted: 27 December 2019; Published: 1 January 2020 Abstract: In this study, a multifaceted approach for selecting the suitable candidates for bioaugmentation of activated sludge (AS) that supports leachate treatment was used. To determine the exploitation of 10 bacterial strains isolated from the various matrices for inoculating the AS contaminated with the Kalina pond leachate (KPL), their degradative potential was analyzed along with their aptitude to synthesize compounds improving remediation of pollutants in wastewater and ability to incorporate into the AS flocs. Based on their capability to degrade aromatic compounds (primarily catechol, phenol, and cresols) at a concentration of 1 mg/mL and survive in 12.5% of the KPL, Pseudomonas putida OR45a and P. putida KB3 can be considered to be the best candidates for bioaugmentation of the AS among all of the bacteria tested. Genomic analyses of these two strains revealed the presence of the genes encoding enzymes related to the metabolism of aromatic compounds. Additionally, both microorganisms exhibited a high hydrophobic propensity (above 50%) and an ability to produce biosurfactants as well as high resistance to ammonium (above 600 µg/mL) and heavy metals (especially chromium).
    [Show full text]
  • Bioremediation of Groundwater: an Overview
    International Journal of Applied Engineering Research ISSN 0973-4562 Volume 13, Number 24 (2018) pp. 16825-16832 © Research India Publications. http://www.ripublication.com Bioremediation of Groundwater: An Overview Shivam Mani Tripathi 1, Shri Ram2 1 ,2 Civil Engineering Department, MMMUT Gorakhpur, India Abstract can be treated on site, thus reducing exposure risks for clean- In past, we have large open area and abundant land resources up personnel, or potentially wider exposure as a result of and groundwater. But after the industrialization the use of transportation accidents. Methodology of this process is not hazardous chemicals increased due to unmanageable technically difficult, considerable experience and knowledge conditions. The chemical disposed on the ground surface & may require implementing this process, by thoroughly many other anthropogenic activities by humans like use of investigating the site and to know required condition to pesticides and oil spillage contaminated the soil and achieve. groundwater. The different type of contaminant by percolation The usual technique of remediation is to plow up through the ground reach to the aquifer and get affected which contaminated soil and take away to the site, or to cover or cap causes serious problem. We spend lot of money and use many the contaminated area. There are some drawbacks. The first technologies to extract and remediate the contamination. In method simply transport the contaminated materials which spite of different methods, bioremediation is a technology create major risks is excavation, handling, and transport of which is cost efficient and effective by using natural microbes hazardous material. It is very difficult to find the new landfill and degrades the contaminants the conditions and different sites for disposal.
    [Show full text]
  • Biostimulation of in Situ Microbial Degradation Processes in Organically-Enriched Sediments Mitigates the Impact of Aquaculture
    Chemosphere 226 (2019) 715e725 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Chemosphere journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/chemosphere Biostimulation of in situ microbial degradation processes in organically-enriched sediments mitigates the impact of aquaculture Francesca Ape a, Elena Manini b, Grazia Marina Quero c, Gian Marco Luna b, * Gianluca Sara d, Paolo Vecchio e, Pierlorenzo Brignoli e, Sante Ansferri e, Simone Mirto a, a Istituto per lo studio degli impatti Antropici e Sostenibilita in ambiente marino (IAS-CNR), Via G. da Verrazzano, 17, 91014, Castellammare del Golfo, TP, Italy b Istituto per le Risorse Biologiche e le Biotecnologie Marine (IRBIM-CNR), Via Largo Fiera della Pesca, 1 e 60122 Ancona, Italy c Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Integrative Marine Ecology Department, 80121, Napoli, Italy d Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra e del Mare, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze Ed. 16, 90128, Palermo, Italy e Eurovix S.p.A. - V.le E. Mattei 17, 24060, Entratico (Bergamo), Italy highlights graphical abstract Bioremediation reduces the accumu- lation of organic matter in fish farm sediments. The bioactivator stimulates in situ microbial degradation processes. Bioremediation induces shifts in prokaryotic community composition. A shift from anaerobic to aerobic prokaryotic metabolism is promoted. The treatment is ineffective on the fecal bacteria from farmed fishes. article info abstract Article history: Fish farm deposition, resulting in organic matter accumulation on bottom sediments, has been identified Received 9 November 2018 as among the main phenomena causing negative environmental impacts in aquaculture. An in situ Received in revised form bioremediation treatment was carried out in order to reduce the organic matter accumulation in the fish 12 March 2019 farm sediments by promoting the natural microbial biodegradation processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Biostimulation of Some Fungal Strains for the Degradation of Atrazine
    Global Journal of Science Frontier Research: I Interdisciplinary Volume 18 Issue 2 Version 1.0 Year 2018 Type: Double Blind Peer Reviewed International Research Journal Publisher: Global Journals Online ISSN: 2249-4626 & Print ISSN: 0975-5896 Biostimulation of Some Fungal Strains for the Degradation of Atrazine Contaminated Soil By Danjuma Isah, Mohammed Adamu Milala & Adams Lawan Ngala University of Maiduguri Abstract- Biostimulatory effects of cow dung on some fungal biodegradation of atrazine. This work was designed to investigate the effect of using a biostimulant (cow dung) on some fungal strains for the possible degradation of atrazine-contaminated soil. The physicochemical characteristics of the soil and cow dung were determined using standard methods. The effects of pre and post biostimulation of fungal species were carried out using enumeration techniques. Fungal strains such as Trichoderma harzianum and Aspergillus niger were identified based on macroscopic and microscopic identification. Atrazine degradation was monitored by assaying the enzymes involved in the degradation and its metabolites using GC-MS techniques. The results of the soil physicochemical characteristics showed slightly acidic pH (6.7±0.99), moderate calcium (6.3±0.19Cmol/kg), high magnesium (5.10±0.38 Cmol/kg), moderate potassium (0.48±0.02 Cmol/kg, low sodium (0.15±0.01 Cmol/kg), moderately low nitrogen (0.16±0.01g/kg), moderate phosphorus (12.22±1.45 g/kg), high O.C(15.38±0.05 g/kg) were obtained respectively. Keywords: atrazine, biostimulation, degradation, fungi, contamination, soil. GJSFR-I Classification: FOR Code: 060199 BiostimulationofSomeFungalStrainsfortheDegradationofAtrazineContaminatedSoil Strictly as per the compliance and regulations of: © 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Biostimulation and Bioaugmentation for Remediation of Soil Contaminated with Spent Motor Oil
    Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 8 (1), 187-194, Winter 2011 S. Abdulsalam et al. ISSN: 1735-1472 © IRSEN, CEERS, IAU Comparison of biostimulation and bioaugmentation for remediation of soil contaminated with spent motor oil 1*S. Abdulsalam; 2I. M. Bugaje; 3S. S. Adefila; 4S. Ibrahim Chemical Engineering Programme, Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University, Bauchi, Nigeria Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Maiduguri, Borno State, Nigeria Department of Chemical Engineering, Ahmadu Bello University Zaria, Nigeria Department of Biochemistry and Director Centre for Biotechnology, Ahmadu Bello University Zaria, Nigeria Received 30 July 2010; revised 3 September 2010; accepted 12 November 2010; available online 1 December 2010 ABSTRACT: Aerobic fixed bed bioreactors were used to study and compare biostimulation and bioaugmentation for remediation of soil contaminated with spent motor oil. Bioaugmentation using consortium of bacteria and biostimulation using inorganic fertilizer and potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate were investigated. The bioremediation indicators used were the oil and grease content removals, total heterotrophic bacteria counts and carbon dioxide respiration rates. Results showed that biodegradations were very effective with 50, 66 and 75 % oil and grease content removal efficiencies for control, bioaugmentation and biostimulation respectively after ten weeks. Carbon dioxide respiration followed similar pattern as the oil and grease content removals. Biostimulation option has the highest carbon dioxide generation (6 249 mg/kg) and the control with the least (4 276 mg/kg). Therefore, the biostimulation option can be used to develop a realistic treatment technology for soils contaminated with spent motor oil. Keywords: Bacterial count; Bioremediation; Carbon dioxide respiration; Closed system; Fixed bed bioreactor; Oil and grease content INTRODUCTION The quality of life on earth is linked, inextricably, to many of these sites, either as a response to the risk of the overall quality of the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Biostimulation Is a Valuable Tool to Assess Pesticide Biodegradation Capacity of Groundwater Microorganisms
    Chemosphere 280 (2021) 130793 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Chemosphere journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/chemosphere Biostimulation is a valuable tool to assess pesticide biodegradation capacity of groundwater microorganisms Andrea Aldas-Vargas, Thomas van der Vooren, Huub H.M. Rijnaarts, Nora B. Sutton * Environmental Technology, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 17, 6700, EV, Wageningen, the Netherlands ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Handling Editor: Chang- Ping Yu Groundwater is the main source for drinking water production globally. Groundwater unfortunately can contain micropollutants (MPs) such as pesticides and/or pesticide metabolites. Biological remediation of MPs in Keywords: groundwater requires an understanding of natural biodegradation capacity and the conditions required to 2,4-D, Biodegradation stimulate biodegradation activity. Thus, biostimulation experiments are a valuable tool to assess pesticide Biostimulation biodegradation capacity of fieldmicroorganisms. To this end, groundwater samples were collected at a drinking Degradation capacity water abstraction aquifer at two locations, fivedifferent depths. Biodegradation of the MPs BAM, MCPP and 2,4- Pesticides D was assessed in microcosms with groundwater samples, either without amendment, or amended with electron acceptor (nitrate or oxygen) and/or carbon substrate (dissolved organic carbon (DOC)). Oxygen + DOC was the most successful amendment resulting in complete biodegradation of 2,4-D in all microcosms after 42 days. DOC was most likely used as a growth substrate that enhanced co-metabolic 2,4-D degradation with oxygen as electron acceptor. Different biodegradation rates were observed per groundwater sample. Overall, microor­ ganisms from the shallow aquifer had faster biodegradation rates than those from the deep aquifer. Higher microbial activity was also observed in terms of CO2 production in the microcosms with shallow groundwater.
    [Show full text]
  • Advances in Anaerobic Benzene Bioremediation: Microbes, Mechanisms, and Biotechnologies
    Advances in Anaerobic Benzene Bioremediation: Microbes, Mechanisms, and Biotechnologies Sandra Dworatzek, Phil Dennis and Jeff Roberts RemTech, Virtual October 15, 2020 Introduction and Acknowledgements • Sandra Dworatzek, Jennifer Webb (SiREM, Guelph, ON) • Elizabeth Edwards, Nancy Bawa, Shen Guo and Courtney Toth (University of Toronto, Toronto, ON) • Kris Bradshaw and Rachel Peters (Federated Co-operatives Ltd., Saskatoon, SK) • Krista Stevenson (Imperial Oil, Sarnia, ON) The Landscape of Hydrocarbon Bioremediation: A Lot Has Changed… Microbial bioremediation is currently the most common technology used to remediate petroleum hydrocarbons Microbial Remediation Phytoremediation Chemical Treatment Contain and Excavate Pump and Treat Other Near Cold Lake, Alberta Adapted from Elekwachi et al., 2014 (J Bioremed Biodeg 5) What Sites are Currently Being Targeted for Hydrocarbon Bioremediation? 4 Shallow Soils and Groundwater 1 2 (aerobic) Offshore Spills Ex situ Bioreactors (mostly aerobic) (mostly aerobic) 3 Tailings Ponds 5 Deeper Groundwater (aerobic and anaerobic) (intrinsically anaerobic) Groundwater Bioremediation Technologies Focusing on Anaerobic Microbial Processes Natural Attenuation Biostimulation Bioaugmentation unsaturated zone aquifer 3- PO4 sugars Plume source - 2- NO3 SO4 VFAs GW flow aquitard Bioaugmentation for anaerobic sites works! Dehalococcoides (Dhc) bioaugmentation is widely accepted to improve reductive dehalogenation of chlorinated ethenes 1 Month Post KB-1® Bioaugmentation Dhc TCE Bioaugmentation for anaerobic
    [Show full text]
  • Microbial Community Changes in Methyl Tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)- Contaminated Soils
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-2004 Microbial Community Changes in Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)- Contaminated Soils Bo Yang University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Civil and Environmental Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Yang, Bo, "Microbial Community Changes in Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)-Contaminated Soils. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2004. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/2223 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Bo Yang entitled "Microbial Community Changes in Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)-Contaminated Soils." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Environmental Engineering. Kung-Hui Chu, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Chris D. Cox, Paul D. Frymier Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Bo Yang entitled “Microbial Community Changes in Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)-Contaminated Soils.” I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Environmental Engineering.
    [Show full text]
  • Biostimulation Proved to Be the Most Efficient Method in the Comparison of in Situ Soil Remediation Treatments After a Simulated Oil Spill Accident
    Environ Sci Pollut Res DOI 10.1007/s11356-016-7606-0 RESEARCH ARTICLE Biostimulation proved to be the most efficient method in the comparison of in situ soil remediation treatments after a simulated oil spill accident Suvi Simpanen 1 & Mari Dahl1 & Magdalena Gerlach1 & Anu Mikkonen2 & Vuokko Malk1,3 & Juha Mikola1 & Martin Romantschuk1 Received: 10 May 2016 /Accepted: 5 September 2016 # The Author(s) 2016. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract The use of in situ techniques in soil remediation is reduced contaminant leakage through the soil. The chemical still rare in Finland and most other European countries due to oxidation did not enhance soil cleanup and resulted in the the uncertainty of the effectiveness of the techniques especial- mobilization of contaminants. Our results suggest that bio- ly in cold regions and also due to their potential side effects on stimulation can decrease or even prevent oil migration in re- the environment. In this study, we compared the biostimula- cently contaminated areas and can thus be considered as a tion, chemical oxidation, and natural attenuation treatments in potentially safe in situ treatment also in groundwater areas. natural conditions and pilot scale during a 16-month experi- ment. A real fuel spill accident was used as a model for ex- Keywords Hydrocarbon contamination . Soil periment setup and soil contamination. We found that biostim- bioremediation . Biodegradation . Biostimulation . Chemical ulation significantly decreased the contaminant leachate into oxidation . Molecular monitoring the water, including also the non-aqueous phase liquid (NAPL). The total NAPL leachate was 19 % lower in the biostimulation treatment that in the untreated soil and 34 % Abbreviations lower in the biostimulation than oxidation treatment.
    [Show full text]