DOCSLIB.ORG

Principles and Practices of Enhanced Anaerobic Bioremediation of Chlorinated Solvents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Principles and Practices of Enhanced Anaerobic Bioremediation of Chlorinated Solvents FINAL Principles and Practices of Enhanced Anaerobic Bioremediation of Chlorinated Solvents August 2004 This page intentionally left blank PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICES OF ENHANCED ANAEROBIC BIOREMEDIATION OF CHLORINATED SOLVENTS August 2004 Prepared for: Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence Brooks City-Base, Texas Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center Port Hueneme, California and Environmental Security Technology Certification Program Arlington, Virginia This page intentionally left blank ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Parsons Corporation (Parsons) prepared this Principles and Practices document under contract to the Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence (AFCEE, Contract F41624-00- D-8024) and the Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center (NFESC, Contract N47408-98- D-7527). The NFESC contract was funded by the Environmental Security Technology Certification Program (ESTCP). The United States Army Corp of Engineers (USACE) assisted with technical review. This document is intended to assist AFCEE, NFESC, ESTCP, USACE and their United States (US) Department of Defense (DoD) technology-transition partners in evaluating and applying enhanced in situ anaerobic bioremediation for restoration of groundwater contaminated with chlorinated solvents. The authors acknowledge the assistance of numerous individuals who provided review services, and to several environmental contractors that provided case studies and information regarding respective areas of expertise. These individuals and their affiliations are listed in Appendix A. - i - 022/738863/28.doc DISCLAIMER In no event shall either the United States Government or Parsons have any responsibility or liability for any consequences of any use, misuse, inability to use, or reliance on the information contained herein; nor does either warrant or otherwise represent in any way the accuracy, adequacy, efficacy, or applicability of the contents hereof. Mention of trade names in this report is for information purposes only; no endorsement is implied. - ii - 022/738863/28.doc TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEGEMENTS ....................................................................................................i DISCLAIMER.....................................................................................................................ii SECTION 1 - STATE OF THE PRACTICE ...................................................................1-1 1.1 Problem Statement................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Objective...............................................................................................................1-2 1.2.1 Intended Audience....................................................................................1-3 1.2.2 Using the Principles and Practices Document..........................................1-3 1.3 Roadmap to Enhanced In Situ Anaerobic Bioremediation...................................1-4 1.4 Technology Description.......................................................................................1-6 1.4.1 Remedial Objectives and Regulatory Acceptance .....................................1-7 1.4.2 Applicable Contaminants (Chlorinated Solvents)....................................1-7 1.4.3 Degradation Processes..............................................................................1-8 1.4.4 Anaerobic Reductive Dechlorination .......................................................1-9 1.4.5 Molecular Hydrogen as a Direct Electron Donor...................................1-11 1.4.6 Microbiology of Anaerobic Reductive Dechlorination..........................1-12 1.5 Application of Enhanced Anaerobic Bioremediation.........................................1-12 1.5.1 Technology Screening............................................................................1-13 1.5.2 Substrate (Electron Donor) Alternatives ................................................1-14 1.5.3 System Configurations...........................................................................1-16 1.5.4 Delivery Options....................................................................................1-19 1.6 Alternative Remedial Strategies.........................................................................1-20 1.7 Advantages and Limitations of Enhanced Anaerobic Bioremediation ..............1-21 1.7.1 Advantages of Enhanced Anaerobic Bioremediation.............................1-21 1.7.2 Potential Limitations of Enhanced Anaerobic Bioremediation..............1-22 1.8 Summary.............................................................................................................1-23 SECTION 2 - MICROBIOLOGICAL AND GEOCHEMICAL CONSIDERATIONS ..2-1 2.1 Microbial Processes and Degradation Pathways..................................................2-2 2.1.1 Degradation Processes for Chlorinated Solvents .....................................2-2 2.1.2 Anaerobic Reductive Dechlorination .......................................................2-2 2.1.3 Native Electron Acceptors and Oxidation-Reduction Conditions ...........2-5 2.1.4 Fermentation Reactions and Molecular Hydrogen...................................2-6 2.1.4.1 Fermentation............................................................................2-7 - iii - 022/738863/28.doc TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Page 2.1.4.2 Donor-Specific Fermentation Reactions .................................2-7 2.1.4.3 Molecular Hydrogen as an Electron Donor.............................2-8 2.1.4.4 Stoichiometric Relationships.................................................2-11 2.1.5 Alternate Degradation Processes............................................................2-12 2.1.5.1 Oxidative Pathways...............................................................2-12 2.1.5.2 Abiotic Pathways...................................................................2-13 2.1.6 Relative Rates of Degradation................................................................2-14 2.2 Microbial Communities Required for Anaerobic Reductive Dechlorination ....2-16 2.2.1 The Role and Occurrence of Dehalococcoides Microorganisms...........2-17 2.2.2 Microbial Ecology..................................................................................2-19 2.2.3 Occurrence and Site-Specific Variability...............................................2-19 2.2.4 Environmental Requirements .................................................................2-20 2.2.5 Reasons for Apparent/Actual DCE Stall or Slowdown........................2-21 2.2.6 Bioaugmentation.....................................................................................2-22 2.3 Effects of Substrate Addition on DNAPL and Sorbed Contaminant Mass........2-23 SECTION 3 - PRELIMINARY SCREENING ................................................................3-1 3.1 Remedial Objectives and Regulatory Considerations For Enhanced Anaerobic Bioremediation....................................................................................3-2 3.1.1 Remedial Objectives...................................................................................3-2 3.1.2 Regulatory Considerations .........................................................................3-3 3.2 Conceptual Site Models........................................................................................3-4 3.2.1 Classification System for Chlorinated Solvent Plumes............................3-6 3.2.1.1 Type 1 Environment: Groundwater Systems that are Highly Anaerobic due to High Levels of Organic Carbon ..................3-6 3.2.1.2 Type 2 Environment: Systems that are Mildly Anaerobic due to Moderate Levels of Organic Carbon ............................3-7 3.2.1.3 Type 3 Environment: Aerobic Systems with Low Levels of Organic Carbon........................................................................3-8 3.2.1.4 Mixed Environments and Sequential Anaerobic/Aerobic Degradation..............................................................................3-8 3.3 Site Screening Technical Considerations.............................................................3-9 3.3.1 Contaminant Distribution.......................................................................3-10 3.3.2 Microbiology ..........................................................................................3-11 3.3.3 Hydrogeology.........................................................................................3-12 3.3.4 Groundwater Geochemistry....................................................................3-13 3.4 Potential Adverse Impacts..................................................................................3-15 3.4.1 Water Quality.........................................................................................3-15 3.4.1.1 Mobilization of CAHs ...........................................................3-15 3.4.1.2 Secondary Water Quality Issues............................................3-16 3.4.2 Generation of Volatile Byproducts and Noxious Gases.........................3-18 3.5 Proceeding with Enhanced Anaerobic Bioremediation......................................3-18 - iv - 022/738863/28.doc TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Page SECTION 4 - PRE-DESIGN............................................................................................4-1 4.1 Evaluating Existing Data......................................................................................4-3 4.1.1 Reviewing Field Data for Anaerobic Biodegradation Potential...............4-4 4.1.2 Geochemical
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bioaugmentation: an Emerging Strategy of Industrial Wastewater Treatment for Reuse and Discharge
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Review Bioaugmentation: An Emerging Strategy of Industrial Wastewater Treatment for Reuse and Discharge Alexis Nzila 1,*, Shaikh Abdur Razzak 2 and Jesse Zhu 3 1 Department of Life Sciences, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM), P.O. Box 468, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia 2 Department of Chemical Engineering, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM), Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia; [email protected] 3 Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 5B9, Canada; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +966-13-860-7716; Fax: +966-13-860-4277 Academic Editors: Rao Bhamidiammarri and Kiran Tota-Maharaj Received: 12 May 2016; Accepted: 9 July 2016; Published: 25 August 2016 Abstract: A promising long-term and sustainable solution to the growing scarcity of water worldwide is to recycle and reuse wastewater. In wastewater treatment plants, the biodegradation of contaminants or pollutants by harnessing microorganisms present in activated sludge is one of the most important strategies to remove organic contaminants from wastewater. However, this approach has limitations because many pollutants are not efficiently eliminated. To counterbalance the limitations, bioaugmentation has been developed and consists of adding specific and efficient pollutant-biodegrading microorganisms into a microbial community in an effort to enhance the ability of this microbial community to biodegrade contaminants. This approach has been tested for wastewater cleaning with encouraging results, but failure has also been reported, especially during scale-up. In this review, work on the bioaugmentation in the context of removal of important pollutants from industrial wastewater is summarized, with an emphasis on recalcitrant compounds, and strategies that can be used to improve the efficiency of bioaugmentation are also discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioaugmentation of Chlorinated Solvents
    BIOAUGMENTATION FOR REMEDIATION OF CHLORINATED SOLVENTS: TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT, STATUS, AND RESEARCH NEEDS October 2005 GeoSyntec Consultants TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ...........................................................................................................................................III LIST OF FIGURES .........................................................................................................................................III ACRONYMNS AND ABBREVIATIONS........................................................................................................V FOREWORD...................................................................................................................................................VII EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................... IX 1. INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................................1 2. EARLY DEVELOPMENT OF BIOAUGMENTATION.............................................................................5 3. RECENT PROGRESS IN CHLORINATED SOLVENT BIOREMEDIATION .....................................13 4. DEHALORESPIRATION: THE KEY PROCESS UNDERLYING CURRENT BIOAUGMENTATION PRACTICES..............................................................................................................................................................19 4.1 THE UBIQUITY CONCEPT REVISITED
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Methods
    Biological Methods Jerry Walsh, Jenna Bishop, Quinn Albertson, Shane Galloway, Carlos Rivera, Tom Devenney, Jeff Green Physical Mechanisms In Situ Methods Permeable Reactive Barriers Biostimulation Bioaugmentation Phytoremediation Permeable Reactive Barriers (Biobarriers) • Semi-permeable reactive media in flow path • Chemically or biologically-mediated reactions transform contaminants into non-toxic or immobile products • Hydrocarbons need to be oxidized • Chlorinated solvents and nitrate need to be reduced • Microorganisms help mediate redox reactions to gain energy and materials for synthesis Reactive Media Reactive Medium Removal Mechanism Contaminants Removed Organic Material Microbial sulfate reduction Acid mine drainage and precipitation Organic Material Microbial nitrate reduction Nitrate Oxygen/Nitrate-Releasing Microbial degradation BTEX Compounds Resting-State Microbial cometabolism Chlorinated aliphatics Microorganisms Oxidative Biodegradation • To respire electrons removed from contaminants, need electron acceptors Aerobic: • Aerobic methods Molecular Oxygen Anaerobic: • Anaerobic methods Nutrients (nitrate, sulfates, CO2, ferric iron, metal oxides, etc) • Aerobic methods are generally preferred to provide more energy to the microbes • Biochemical oxygen demands (BOD’s) often exceed available oxygen, so adding oxygen to the system can stimulate oxidative biodegradation Reductive Biodegradation • Electron donors are required, which anaerobic environments more abundantly produce • Organic matter is a well-suited electron donor for this process • This method works well for TCE, hexavalent chromium, sulfate, and nitrate contamination • Heterotrophic denitrification to remove nitrate Biostimulation • Modification of environment to stimulate existing bacteria capable of bioremediation. • Only works if correct bacteria are present. • Often done through use of phosphorous, nitrogen, carbon, and oxygen. • Chemicals usually added through injection wells. • EPA approved method. Advantages • Low Costs • Can be tailored to the specific site conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Selecting Bacteria Candidates for the Bioaugmentation of Activated Sludge to Improve the Aerobic Treatment of Landfill Leachate
    water Article Selecting Bacteria Candidates for the Bioaugmentation of Activated Sludge to Improve the Aerobic Treatment of Landfill Leachate Justyna Michalska *, Artur Pi ´nski , Joanna Zur˙ and Agnieszka Mrozik Institute of Biology, Biotechnology and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Silesia, Jagiello´nska28, 40-032 Katowice, Poland; [email protected] (A.P.); [email protected] (J.Z.);˙ [email protected] (A.M.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 6 November 2019; Accepted: 27 December 2019; Published: 1 January 2020 Abstract: In this study, a multifaceted approach for selecting the suitable candidates for bioaugmentation of activated sludge (AS) that supports leachate treatment was used. To determine the exploitation of 10 bacterial strains isolated from the various matrices for inoculating the AS contaminated with the Kalina pond leachate (KPL), their degradative potential was analyzed along with their aptitude to synthesize compounds improving remediation of pollutants in wastewater and ability to incorporate into the AS flocs. Based on their capability to degrade aromatic compounds (primarily catechol, phenol, and cresols) at a concentration of 1 mg/mL and survive in 12.5% of the KPL, Pseudomonas putida OR45a and P. putida KB3 can be considered to be the best candidates for bioaugmentation of the AS among all of the bacteria tested. Genomic analyses of these two strains revealed the presence of the genes encoding enzymes related to the metabolism of aromatic compounds. Additionally, both microorganisms exhibited a high hydrophobic propensity (above 50%) and an ability to produce biosurfactants as well as high resistance to ammonium (above 600 µg/mL) and heavy metals (especially chromium).
    [Show full text]
  • Bioremediation of Groundwater: an Overview
    International Journal of Applied Engineering Research ISSN 0973-4562 Volume 13, Number 24 (2018) pp. 16825-16832 © Research India Publications. http://www.ripublication.com Bioremediation of Groundwater: An Overview Shivam Mani Tripathi 1, Shri Ram2 1 ,2 Civil Engineering Department, MMMUT Gorakhpur, India Abstract can be treated on site, thus reducing exposure risks for clean- In past, we have large open area and abundant land resources up personnel, or potentially wider exposure as a result of and groundwater. But after the industrialization the use of transportation accidents. Methodology of this process is not hazardous chemicals increased due to unmanageable technically difficult, considerable experience and knowledge conditions. The chemical disposed on the ground surface & may require implementing this process, by thoroughly many other anthropogenic activities by humans like use of investigating the site and to know required condition to pesticides and oil spillage contaminated the soil and achieve. groundwater. The different type of contaminant by percolation The usual technique of remediation is to plow up through the ground reach to the aquifer and get affected which contaminated soil and take away to the site, or to cover or cap causes serious problem. We spend lot of money and use many the contaminated area. There are some drawbacks. The first technologies to extract and remediate the contamination. In method simply transport the contaminated materials which spite of different methods, bioremediation is a technology create major risks is excavation, handling, and transport of which is cost efficient and effective by using natural microbes hazardous material. It is very difficult to find the new landfill and degrades the contaminants the conditions and different sites for disposal.
    [Show full text]
  • Chlorinated Solvent Bioremediation: Fundamentals and Practical Application for Remedial Project Managers Presented By: Christopher Marks, Ph.D
    Chlorinated Solvent Bioremediation: Fundamentals and Practical Application for Remedial Project Managers Presented by: Christopher Marks, Ph.D. & Carolyn Acheson, Ph.D. US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development National Risk Management Research Laboratory CLU-IN Webinar Nov. 14, 2018 Source: Accelerated Bioremediation of Chlorinated Solvents, Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council and Remediation and Technology Development Forum, 2003 1 Bioremediation of Chlorinated Solvents Source: Accelerated Bioremediation of Chlorinated Solvents, Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council and Remediation and Technology 2 Development Forum, 2003 Part I: Introduction to Chlorinated Solvent Properties and Anaerobic Reductive Dechlorination 3 Terminology • Anaerobic: Microbial metabolic processes occurring in the absence of oxygen. • Anaerobic Reductive Dechlorination: The biological removal of a chlorine atom from an organic compound and replacement with a hydrogen atom in a reducing environment. • Biodegradation aka biotransformation: Biologically mediated reactions which convert one chemical to another. For example, PCE is converted to TCE when anaerobic reductive reactions remove a chlorine molecule. • Bioremediation: The engineered approaches using microorganisms to biodegrade contaminants. • Biostimulation: The addition of organic electron donors and nutrients to enhance the rate of reductive dechlorination by the native microflora. • Bioaugmentation: The addition of beneficial microorganisms to enhance the capacity
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of in Situ Bioremediation of Chlorinated Ethene DNAPL Source Zones
    INTERSTATE TECHNOLOGY & REGULATORY COUNCIL Warning! This document has not been amended since publication. Some content may be out of date and may no longer apply. INTERSTATE TECHNOLOGY & REGULATORY COUNCIL Technology Overview Overview of In Situ Bioremediation of Chlorinated Ethene DNAPL Source Zones October 2005 Prepared by The Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council Bioremediation of DNAPLs Team ABOUT ITRC Established in 1995, the Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council (ITRC) is a state-led, national coalition of personnel from the environmental regulatory agencies of more than 40 states and the District of Columbia, three federal agencies, tribes, and public and industry stakeholders. The organization is devoted to reducing barriers to and speeding interstate deployment of, better, more cost-effective, innovative environmental techniques. ITRC operates as a committee of the Environmental Research Institute of the States (ERIS), a Section 501(c)(3) public charity that supports the Environmental Council of the States (ECOS) through its educational and research activities aimed at improving the environment in the United States and providing a forum for state environmental policy makers. More information about ITRC and its available products and services can be found on the Internet at www.itrcweb.org. DISCLAIMER This document is designed to help regulators and others develop a consistent approach to their evaluation, regulatory approval, and deployment of specific technologies at specific sites. Although the information in this document is believed to be reliable and accurate, this document and all material set forth herein are provided without warranties of any kind, either express or implied, including but not limited to warranties of the accuracy or completeness of information contained in the document.
    [Show full text]
  • Considerations for the Collection and Evaluation of Natural Attenuation Parameters at Sites Contaminated with Chlorinated Solvents
    CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE COLLECTION AND EVALUATION OF NATURAL ATTENUATION PARAMETERS AT SITES CONTAMINATED WITH CHLORINATED SOLVENTS Chlorine • Hydrogen • Carbon • Bond "\. ( . I Vinyl Chloride I . ~ I Cis-1,2-Dichloroethene I ITrichloroethene I .,. Source Area Biological Active Area DowngradientI Area Filure 3 Anaerobic Reductive Dechlorination ofa Trichloroethene Plnm.e Prepared by Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Division of Waste Management Bureau of Waste Cleanup Hazardous Waste Cleanup Section April 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE 1.0 IN'TR.ODUCTION ........................................................................................ 1 ~ 2.0 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF CHLORINATED ALIPHATIC HYDROCARBON BIODEGRADATION................................................. 2 2.1 Bacteria 2.2 Electron Acceptor Reactions 2.3 Electron Donor Reactions 2.4 Co-Metabolism 3.0 NATURAL ATTENUATION BY PHYSICAL PROCESSES ................... 4 4.0 METABOLIC BY-PRODUCTS AND REDOX PROCESSES IN GROUNDWATER SYSTEMS ................................................................... 4 S.O EVIDENCE USED TO SUPPORT NATURAL ATTENUATION•••••••••• S 5.1 Direct Evidence S.2 Examine Changes 5.3 Laboratory microcosm studies 6.0 METHODOLOGY USED FOR DATA REVIEW AND SITE EVALUATION........................................................................................... 6 7.0 NATURAL ATTENUATION SAMPLING AND DATA EVALUATION METHODOLOGY..................................................................................... 9 7.1 Monitor Well
    [Show full text]
  • Advances in Anaerobic Benzene Bioremediation: Microbes, Mechanisms, and Biotechnologies
    Advances in Anaerobic Benzene Bioremediation: Microbes, Mechanisms, and Biotechnologies Sandra Dworatzek, Phil Dennis and Jeff Roberts RemTech, Virtual October 15, 2020 Introduction and Acknowledgements • Sandra Dworatzek, Jennifer Webb (SiREM, Guelph, ON) • Elizabeth Edwards, Nancy Bawa, Shen Guo and Courtney Toth (University of Toronto, Toronto, ON) • Kris Bradshaw and Rachel Peters (Federated Co-operatives Ltd., Saskatoon, SK) • Krista Stevenson (Imperial Oil, Sarnia, ON) The Landscape of Hydrocarbon Bioremediation: A Lot Has Changed… Microbial bioremediation is currently the most common technology used to remediate petroleum hydrocarbons Microbial Remediation Phytoremediation Chemical Treatment Contain and Excavate Pump and Treat Other Near Cold Lake, Alberta Adapted from Elekwachi et al., 2014 (J Bioremed Biodeg 5) What Sites are Currently Being Targeted for Hydrocarbon Bioremediation? 4 Shallow Soils and Groundwater 1 2 (aerobic) Offshore Spills Ex situ Bioreactors (mostly aerobic) (mostly aerobic) 3 Tailings Ponds 5 Deeper Groundwater (aerobic and anaerobic) (intrinsically anaerobic) Groundwater Bioremediation Technologies Focusing on Anaerobic Microbial Processes Natural Attenuation Biostimulation Bioaugmentation unsaturated zone aquifer 3- PO4 sugars Plume source - 2- NO3 SO4 VFAs GW flow aquitard Bioaugmentation for anaerobic sites works! Dehalococcoides (Dhc) bioaugmentation is widely accepted to improve reductive dehalogenation of chlorinated ethenes 1 Month Post KB-1® Bioaugmentation Dhc TCE Bioaugmentation for anaerobic
    [Show full text]
  • Microbial Community Changes in Methyl Tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)- Contaminated Soils
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-2004 Microbial Community Changes in Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)- Contaminated Soils Bo Yang University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Civil and Environmental Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Yang, Bo, "Microbial Community Changes in Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)-Contaminated Soils. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2004. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/2223 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Bo Yang entitled "Microbial Community Changes in Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)-Contaminated Soils." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Environmental Engineering. Kung-Hui Chu, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Chris D. Cox, Paul D. Frymier Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Bo Yang entitled “Microbial Community Changes in Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)-Contaminated Soils.” I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Environmental Engineering.
    [Show full text]
  • Principles and Practices of Enhanced Anaerobic Bioremediation of Chlorinated Solvents
    FINAL Principles and Practices of Enhanced Anaerobic Bioremediation of Chlorinated Solvents August 2004 This page intentionally left blank PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICES OF ENHANCED ANAEROBIC BIOREMEDIATION OF CHLORINATED SOLVENTS August 2004 Prepared for: Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence Brooks City-Base, Texas Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center Port Hueneme, California and Environmental Security Technology Certification Program Arlington, Virginia This page intentionally left blank ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Parsons Corporation (Parsons) prepared this Principles and Practices document under contract to the Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence (AFCEE, Contract F41624-00- D-8024) and the Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center (NFESC, Contract N47408-98- D-7527). The NFESC contract was funded by the Environmental Security Technology Certification Program (ESTCP). The United States Army Corp of Engineers (USACE) assisted with technical review. This document is intended to assist AFCEE, NFESC, ESTCP, USACE and their United States (US) Department of Defense (DoD) technology-transition partners in evaluating and applying enhanced in situ anaerobic bioremediation for restoration of groundwater contaminated with chlorinated solvents. The authors acknowledge the assistance of numerous individuals who provided review services, and to several environmental contractors that provided case studies and information regarding respective areas of expertise. These individuals and their affiliations are listed in Appendix A. - i - 022/738863/28.doc DISCLAIMER In no event shall either the United States Government or Parsons have any responsibility or liability for any consequences of any use, misuse, inability to use, or reliance on the information contained herein; nor does either warrant or otherwise represent in any way the accuracy, adequacy, efficacy, or applicability of the contents hereof.
    [Show full text]
  • Biochemistry and Physiology of Halorespiration by Desulfitobacterium Dehalogenans
    Biochemistry and Physiology of Halorespiration by Desulfitobacterium dehalogenans ..?.^TJ?*LE_ LANDBOUWCATALOGU S 0000 0807 1728 Promotor: Dr.W.M . deVo s hoogleraar in de microbiologie Co-promotoren: Dr.ir .A.J.M .Stam s universitair hoofddocent bij deleerstoelgroe p Microbiologie Dr.ir . G. Schraa universitair docent bij deleerstoelgroe p Microbiologie Stellingen 1. Halorespiratie is een weinig efficiente wijze van ademhalen. Dit proefschrift 2. Halorespiratie moet worden opgevat als verbreding en niet als specialisatie van het genus Desulfitobacterium. Dit proefschrift 3. Reductieve dehalogenases zijn geen nieuwe enzymen. 4. 16S-rRNA probes zijn minder geschikt voor het aantonen van specifieke metabole activiteiten in een complex ecosysteem. Loffler etal. (2000) AEM66 : 1369;Gottscha l &Kroonema n (2000)Bode m3 : 102 5. Het "twin-arginine" transportsysteem wordt niet goed genoeg begrepen om op basis van het voorkomen van het "twin-arginine" motief enzymen te lokaliseren. Berks etal. (2000)Mol .Microbiol .35 : 260 6. Asbesthoudende bodem is niet verontreinigd. 7. Biologische groente is een pleonasme. Stellingen behorende bij het proefschrift 'Biochemistry and physiology of halorespiration by Desulfitobacterium dehalogenans' van Bram A. van de Pas Wageningen, 6 december 2000 MJOQ^O \lZ°]0 ^ Biochemistry and Physiology of Halorespiration by Desulfitobacterium dehalogenans BramA. van de Pas Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor op gezag van derecto r magnificus van Wageningen Universiteit, dr. ir. L. Speelman, in het openbaar
    [Show full text]