DOCSLIB.ORG

Universal Jurisdiction Trial Strategies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Universal Jurisdiction Trial Strategies UNIVERSAL JURISDICTION TRIAL STRATEGIES Focus on victims and witnesses A report on the Conference held in Brussels, 9-11 November 2009 Report published November 2010 Contents INTRODUCTION AND KEY THEMES..................................................................................................................... 4 A. OVERVIEW OF UNIVERSAL JURISDICTION TRIALS IN EUROPE ........................................................... 4 (1) Wolfgang Kaleck: General overview of trials and dismissals ..................................................................... 4 (2) Christopher Hall: Universal Jurisdiction and foreign relations.................................................................... 8 Discussion .............................................................................................................................................................. 10 B. VICTIMS’ EXPERIENCES OF THE TRIAL PROCESS ................................................................................. 11 (1) Clément Abaifouta, Chad: Hissène Habré case in Senegal..................................................................... 11 (2) Marcel Touanga: The Republic of Congo, ‘the Disappeared of the Beach of Brazzaville’ case in France ..................................................................................................................................................................... 13 (3) Carla Artes Company, Argentina: Scilingo case, Spain............................................................................ 16 (4) Wolfgang Blam, Rwanda / Germany: Joseph Mpambara case, the Netherlands................................. 17 Discussion .............................................................................................................................................................. 20 C. PROTECTION OF VICTIMS AND WITNESSES ............................................................................................ 20 (1) Géraldine Mattioli Zeltner: Protection Challenges in the territorial state ................................................ 20 (2) Jaqueline Mukandanga Blam, Rwanda/Germany: Joseph Mpambara case, the Netherlands .......... 22 (3) Hester van Bruggen: Challenges in relation to witness protection from the perspective of national prosecutors............................................................................................................................................................. 24 Discussion .............................................................................................................................................................. 27 D. EVIDENTIARY COLLECTION PRIOR TO TRIAL .......................................................................................... 28 (1) Hester van Bruggen: Access to victim’s firsthand accounts..................................................................... 28 (2) Reed Brody: Role of NGOs ........................................................................................................................... 30 (3) Susanna Mehtonen: Inter-state cooperation and rogatory missions ..................................................... 33 Discussion .............................................................................................................................................................. 36 E. TESTIMONY DURING TRIAL ............................................................................................................................ 38 (1) Manuel Ollé Sesé, Spain: Logistics and other challenges........................................................................ 38 (2) Mari Reid: Video-link witness evidence ....................................................................................................... 40 Discussion .............................................................................................................................................................. 42 (3) Helena Vranov: Psychological support ........................................................................................................ 43 (4) Yaiza Alvarez Reyes: Witness familiarization............................................................................................. 46 (5) Jesus Tecu: Rios Montt case, Guatemala, Spain ...................................................................................... 47 Discussion .............................................................................................................................................................. 48 F. JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, OUTREACH AND IMPACT ................................................................................ 49 (1) Åsa Rydberg van der Sluis: General overview ........................................................................................... 49 (2) Rodolfo Yanzon ............................................................................................................................................... 53 (3) Clémence Bectarte: Ely Ould Dah case judgment, Mauritania, France ................................................. 53 (4) Mamadou Diagana: Ely Ould Dah case, Mauritania, France ................................................................... 55 (5) Viviana Uribe: Outreach, Pinochet case, Chile........................................................................................... 56 Discussion .............................................................................................................................................................. 59 2 REDRESS / FIDH G. REPARATIONS (CLAIMS, AWARDS, ABILITY TO ENFORCE ASSETS)................................................ 59 (1) Luc Walleyn: Belgium ..................................................................................................................................... 59 (2) Philip Grant: Switzerland................................................................................................................................61 (3) Héloïse Bajer-Pellet: France.......................................................................................................................... 64 (4) Juan Garces: Spain......................................................................................................................................... 65 H. COUNTRY UPDATES IN EUROPE.................................................................................................................. 67 (1) Siri Frigaard: Norway ...................................................................................................................................... 67 (2) Lars Hedvall: Sweden..................................................................................................................................... 70 (3) Philip Grant: Switzerland................................................................................................................................72 (4) Andreas Schüller: Germany and Austria ..................................................................................................... 74 Discussion .............................................................................................................................................................. 75 (5) Manuel Ollé Sésé: Spain................................................................................................................................75 (6) Luc Walleyn: Belgium ..................................................................................................................................... 77 (7) Kate Maynard: United Kingdom .................................................................................................................... 79 (8) Chantal Joubert: Netherlands........................................................................................................................ 81 (9) Patrick Baudouin: France............................................................................................................................... 83 Discussion .............................................................................................................................................................. 85 CLOSING REMARKS............................................................................................................................................... 87 REDRESS / FIDH 3 INTRODUCTION AND KEY THEMES The International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) and the Redress Trust (REDRESS) have been working together on extraterritorial jurisdiction for about six years, with the main goal being to facilitate exchanges and foster a common approach between the different Member States of the European Union (EU). We have sought to bring together different national and international actors involved in this work, including lawyers, human rights organizations, investigators, prosecutors and EU officials, to encourage discussion of the central challenges relating to the exercise by Member States of extraterritorial jurisdiction, mutual cooperation and the challenges associated with the investigation and prosecution of such crimes. This conference is part of this overall programme of work. The focus of this particular conference is on trial strategies and in many ways the topic attests to the progress that has been made over the past decade with extraterritorial jurisdiction cases. We could never have had a conference ten years ago on trial strategies because the number of cases that had proceeded to the trial
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Juicio a Las Juntas Militares (Argentina)
    Juicio a las juntas militares (Argentina) The 1985 trial of the Argentinean Military Junta Members is an historical trial which saw the prosecution of the leaders of the three first Argentinean juntas of 1976 – 1983. The hearings were held from 22 April to 9 December 1985. Due to the large number of victims, the Court selected 280 emblematic cases among the 709 cases presented by the Prosecution. The Prosecutor’s closing argument, with its “ ¡ nuncas mas !”, remains historical. On 9 December 1985, the verdict stated that the Military Juntas had “developed and implemented a criminal plan to fight terrorism, leaving considerable discretion to the junior officers of the armed forces to imprison those who where described as ‘subversives’ by the intelligence services; to torture them; to subject them to inhumane living conditions; and ultimately to decide freely on the final fate of their victims: being transferred to the legal system (judiciary or police), being released, or being simply executed” (unofficial translation of an extract of the judgment). Jorge Rafael Videla and Emilio Eduardo Massera (first Junta) were sentenced to life imprisonment. Roberto Eduardo Viola (second Junta) was sentenced to 17 years’ imprisonment, Armando Lambruschini (second Junta) to 8 years and Orlando Ramón Agosti (first Junta) to 4 years. Omar Graffigna (second Junta), Leopoldo Galtieri, Jorge Isaac Anaya et Basilio Lami Dozo (third Junta) were acquitted for lack of evidence. This trial is the first in South-America where former dictators were brought before judges by a democratic government. On 29 December 1990, Argentinean President Carlos Menen published Decree 2741/90 pardoning the accused sentenced during the 1985 trial.
    [Show full text]
  • EBRD-Project-Progress-Report-As-Of
    BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA THE FEDERATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA JP Autoceste FBiH d.o.o. Mostar PROJECT PROGRESS REPORT As of 31st December, 2018 Project: CONSTRUCTION OF MOTORWAYS IN THE FEDERATION OF B&H Mostar, January 2019 CONTENTS: 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 3 Project description ................................................................................................................................... 3 2. LOAN AGREEMENTS .............................................................................................................. 5 3. PROCUREMENT PLAN ............................................................................................................ 7 4. MAIN DESIGN ..................................................................................................................... 10 5. PREPARATORY ACTIVITIES FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS ........... Error! Bookmark not defined. 5.1. Section Poprikuša - Nemila ....................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.3 5.2. Section Northern Border of the municipality Zenica (Nemila) - Zenica North (D. Gračanica) Error! Bookmark not defined.3 5.2.1. Subsection Nemila - Vranduk ................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined.3 5.2.2. Subsection Vranduk - Ponirak .................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 5.2.3. Subsection Ponirak - Vraca .....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Evropska Banka Za Obnovu I Razvoj London, Velika Britanija Vododnabdjevanje U Ĉapljini Rezime Okolišnog I Okolišna I Društvena Analiza Društvenog Pregleda
    Doc. No. 11-690-H2 Rev. 1 – NOVEMBAR 2011 Evropska banka za obnovu i razvoj London, Velika Britanija Vododnabdjevanje u Ĉapljini Rezime okolišnog i Okolišna i društvena analiza društvenog pregleda Doc. No. 11-690-H2 Rev. 1 – NOVEMBAR 2011 Evropska banka za obnovu i razvoj London, Velika Britanija Vododnabdjevanje u Ĉapljini Rezime okolišnog I Okolišna i društvena analiza društvenog pregleda Pripremio/la Potpis Datum Marcello Zolezzi Novembar 2011 Kontrolirao/la Potpis Datum Massimiliano Monetti Novembar 2011 Giovanni De Franchi Novembar 2011 Odobrio/la Potpis Datum Paola Rentocchini Novembar 2011 Potvrdio/la Potpis Datum Roberto Carpaneto Novembar 2011 Rev. Opis Pripremio/la Kontrolirao/la Odobrio/la Potvrdio/la Datum 0 Prvo izdanje MZ MM/GBD PAR RC Novembar 2011 1 Prvo izdanje MZ MM/GBD PAR RC Novembar 2011 All rights, including translation, reserved. No part of this document may be disclosed to any third party, for purposes other than the original, without written consent of D'Appolonia. Doc. No. 11-690-H2 Rev. 1 – Novembar 2011 SADRŢAJ Strana SPISAK SLIKA II 1 UVOD 1 1.1 OPSEG RADA 2 1.2 ORGANIZACIJA IZVJEŠTAVANJA 2 2 SADAŠNJE STANJE 3 2.1 JAVNO KOMUNALNO PREDUZEĆE ĈAPLJINA 3 2.2 POSTOJEĆA VODO I KANALIZACIONA MREŢA 3 2.2.1 Vodovodna mreţa 3 2.2.2 Otpadne vode 4 2.3 UPRAVLJANJE ĈVRSTIM OTPADOM 5 3 PROJEKAT VODOSNABDIJEVANJA U ĈAPLJINI 6 3.1 SISTEM VODOSNABDIJEVANJA ZA PLATO DUBRAVE 8 3.2 SISTEM VODOSNABDIJEVANJA NASELJA ZVIROVIĆI, PRĆAVCI I TREBIŢAT 9 3.3 CENTRALNI GRADSKI SISTEM 10 4 ANALIZA UTICAJA NA OKOLIŠ, ZDRAVLJE I ZAŠTITU 11
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Torture in Great Britain, the United States, and Argentina, 1869-1977
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont CMC Senior Theses CMC Student Scholarship 2014 Holes in the Historical Record: The olitP ics of Torture in Great Britain, the United States, and Argentina, 1869-1977 Lynsey Chediak Claremont McKenna College Recommended Citation Chediak, Lynsey, "Holes in the Historical Record: The oP litics of Torture in Great Britain, the United States, and Argentina, 1869-1977" (2014). CMC Senior Theses. Paper 875. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/875 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you by Scholarship@Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in this collection by an authorized administrator. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CLAREMONT McKENNA COLLEGE Holes in the Historical Record: The Politics of Torture in Great Britain, the United States, and Argentina, 1869-1977 SUBMITTED TO PROFESSOR LISA FORMAN CODY AND DEAN NICHOLAS WARNER BY LYNSEY CHEDIAK FOR SENIOR HISTORY THESIS SPRING 2014 April 28, 2014 Acknowledgments This thesis would not have been possible without the brilliant minds of my professors at Claremont McKenna College and the encouragement of my family. First, I would like to thank my reader and advisor, Professor Lisa Forman Cody. From my first day in her class, Professor Cody took what I was trying to say and made my statement, and me, sound ten times smarter. From that moment, I started to truly believe in the power of my ideas and a central tenet that made this thesis possible: there is no wrong answer in history, only evidence. Through countless hours of collaboration, Professor Cody spurred my ideas to levels I never could have imagined and helped me to develop my abilities to think critically and analytically of the historical record and the accuracy of sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentación De Powerpoint
    THE TRUTH ABOUT CATALONIA’S BID FOR INDEPENDENCE Last update: 28 November 2019 This document is subject to the evolution of the events it contains and will be periodically updated. Please note the date of the last update and, if necessary, request the latest version from: [email protected] This edition has only been updated to include the sentences of the trial that were published on 14 October. The verb tenses of the previous version have been maintained, without prejudice to the fact that a last update can be made by adjusting the concordances. Contents CATALONIA’S BID FOR INDEPENDENCE 1. Timeline of the Independence bid THE CATALAN INDEPENDENCE BID ON TRIAL 2. The acts of 2017 and their prosecution 3. The five Articles of Spain’s Criminal Code that landed the procès defendants in the dock 4. Safeguards for the accused during the trial 5. Independence and safeguards of the Spanish legal system 6. Private prosecution: What is it? 7. The trial and sentences THE TRUTH ABOUT SPAIN AND ITS CATALAN REGION 8. The secessionists’ falsehoods 9. Spain is a state made up of Autonomous Communities 10. The price Catalonia is paying for the independence bid 11. Spain in international rankings QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS APPENDIX CATALONIA’S BID FOR INDEPENDENCE 1. Timeline of the Independence bid 11 SEPT Massive demonstration day (or Diada) for independence 2012 “Consultative process” • Promoted by the Catalan Regional 9 NOV Government [known as the Govern], presided by Artur Mas. 2014 Suspended by Spain’s Constitutional Court. • According to the Catalan regional administration [known as the Generalitat] 2,305,290 citizens voted and 80.76% of them voted in favour of independence.
    [Show full text]
  • The Guatemala Genocide Cases: Universal Jurisdiction and Its Limits
    © The Guatemala Genocide Cases: Universal Jurisdiction and Its Limits by Paul “Woody” Scott* INTRODUCTION Systematic murder, genocide, torture, terror and cruelty – all are words used to describe the campaigns of Guatemalan leaders, including President Jose Efrain Rios Montt, directed toward the indigenous Mayans in the Guatemalan campo. The United Nations-backed Truth Commission concludes that the state carried out deliberate acts of genocide against the Mayan indigenous populations.1 Since Julio Cesar Mendez Montenegro took Guatemalan presidential office in 1966, Guatemala was involved in a bloody civil war between the army and guerrilla groups located in the Guatemalan countryside. The bloodshed escalated as Montt, a fundamentalist Christian minister, rose to power in 1982 after taking part in a coup d’état and becoming the de facto president of Guatemala. He was in power for just sixteen months, considered by many to be the bloodiest period of Guatemala’s history.2 Under his sixteen-month rule, more than 200,000 people were victims of homicide or forced kidnappings, 83% of whom were of indigenous Mayan origin. Indigenous Mayans were targeted, killed, tortured, raped, and * Paul “Woody” Scott is an associate attorney with Jeri Flynn & Associates in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. His practice is primarily immigration law and criminal defense, specializing in defending immigrants charged with criminal offenses, and deportation defense. He was born in San Pedro Sula, Honduras and moved to the United States at a very early age. He is fluent in both English and Spanish. 1 United Nations Office for Project Services [UNOPS], Commission for Historical Clarification [CEH], Conclusions and Recommendations, GUATEMALA, MEMORIA DEL SILENCIO [hereinafter, GUATEMALA, MEMORY OF SILENCE], Volume V, ¶ 26 (1999).
    [Show full text]
  • Javni Poziv Fmroi 2019 – Konačna Rang Lista Potencijalnih Korisnika Za Rekonstrukciju Stambenih Objekata - Općina Konjic
    JAVNI POZIV FMROI 2019 – KONAČNA RANG LISTA POTENCIJALNIH KORISNIKA ZA REKONSTRUKCIJU STAMBENIH OBJEKATA - OPĆINA KONJIC Adresa sanacije R. br. Prezime i ime Ukupno bodova Sadašnja adresa Ribari Glavatičevo Konjic 1. Faladžić (Bajro) Mujo 150 Ribari Glavatičevo Konjic Kašići Konjic 2. Kašić (Fazla) Vahidin 150 Kašići Konjic Ribari Glavatičevo Konjic 3. Ćišo (Ibro) Halil 140 Ribari Glavatičevo Konjic Kose Glavatičevo Konjic 4. Jazvin (Selim) Salko 140 Kose Glavatičevo Konjic Ribari Konjic 5. Ćišo (Salko) Salko 135 Branilaca Konjica Konjic Orahovica Konjic 6. Bubalo (Mehmed) Edin 130 Orahovica Konjic Vrbići Konjic 7. Azinović (Šćepo) Stoja 130 Vrbići Konjic Zabrđe Konjic 8. Čuljak (Luka) Vido 130 Zabrđe konjic Bijela Konjic 9. Andrić (Slavko) Mladenko 120 Ilićka 10/37 Brčko Distrikt Radešine 52b Konjic 10. Mijić (franjo) Luka 120 Radešine 52b Konjic Ljubuča 5 Konjic 11. Pačariz (Osman) Murat 120 Donje Selo Konjic Kašići Konjic 12. Kašić (Omer) Halil 110 Kašići Konjic Maršala Tita 5 konjic 13. Popović (Anđelko) Ruza 110 Maršala Tita 5 Konjic Orahovica Konjic 14. Petrović (Boško) Pero 100 Orahovica Konjic Kanjina Konjic 15. Azinović (Anka) Petar 100 Kanjina Konjic Boračko Jezero konjic 16. Mićević (Mitar) Milosava 100 Boračko jezero Konjic Napomena: Ukoliko se utvrdi da potencijalni korisnik sa Konačne rang liste ima minimum stambenih uslova, isti će biti isključen iz dalje procedure za dobijanje pomoći. KOMISIJA ZA ODABIR KORISNIKA Sarajevo, 10.06.2020.godine JAVNI POZIV FMROI 2019 – KONAČNA RANG LISTA POTENCIJALNIH KORISNIKA ZA REKONSTRUKCIJU STAMBENIH OBJEKATA OPĆINA ČAPLJINA Adresa sanacije R. br. Prezime i ime Ukupno bodova Sadašnja adresa Domanovići Čapljina 1. Šejtanić (Mujo) Suvad 230 Domanovići Čapljina Opličići Čapljina 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Abuelas De Plaza De Mayo Photographs of 30 Years in Struggle
    Abuelas de Plaza de Mayo Photographs of 30 Years in Struggle Idea Abel Madariaga Compilation and production Alejandro Reynoso Text José María Pasquini Durán Captions Guillermo Wulff Design and digital retouching Horacio Petre Translation Tamara Lamela We thank the photographers and the press for their collaboration in the production of this book Copyrighted according to Argentine Law 11723 2 Abuelas de Plaza de Mayo Photographs of 30 Years in Struggle 3 4 1 were arrested. Was it not irresponsible of the youth to procreate The Wait when their own lives were at risk? In any case, they did it because they were completely confident about victory and they deeply J. M. Pasquini Durán* believed in another possible world and in another possible life for future generations. After all, instances of glorious insubordination had taken place during the 60s: the Cordobazo, the Cuban Revolution, Some of the photographs in this book could belong to any the events of May 1968 in France, and the groundbreaking music of family album: their protagonists are not heroes or bandits, but just The Beatles, just to name a few among many others. At the outset, ordinary people, in most cases young men and women who only the 70s looked promising: Chile, for the first time, had a socialist differed in the type of dreams they had. Other photographs, by president popularly elected and, here, Argentina saw the end of the contrast, should be exhibited at a horror museum to be duly eighteen-year proscription of Peronismo, the country’s biggest condemned by future generations. The so very different pictures of popular political movement during the second half of the 20th this collection, beyond the good work of their authors, aim to century.
    [Show full text]
  • Should Politicians Be Prosecuted for Statements Made in the Exercise of Their Mandate?
    Provisional version Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights Should politicians be prosecuted for statements made in the exercise of their mandate? Report Rapporteur: Mr Boriss Cilevičs, Latvia, Socialists, Democrats and Greens Group A. Draft resolution 1. The Assembly stresses the crucial importance, in a living democracy, of politicians being able to freely exercise their mandates. This requires a particularly high level of protection of politicians’ freedom of speech and freedom of assembly, both in parliament and when speaking to their constituents in public meetings or through the media. 2. The European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR, the Convention) protects everyone’s freedom of speech, including the right to make statements that “shock or disturb” those who do not share the same opinions, as established in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights (the Court). 3. The Assembly also notes that freedom of speech is not unlimited. Hate speech condoning violence against certain persons or groups of persons on the grounds of race, origin, religion or political opinions, as well as calls for the violent overthrow of democratic institutions are not protected. Politicians even have a special responsibility, due to their high visibility, to refrain from such abuses. 4. Everyone, and in particular politicians, has the right to make proposals whose implementation would require changes of the constitution, provided the means advocated are peaceful and legal and the objectives do not run contrary to the fundamental principles of democracy and human rights. 5. This includes calls to change a centralist constitution into a federal or confederal one, or vice versa, or to change the legal status and powers of territorial (local and regional) entities, including to grant them a high degree of autonomy or even independence.
    [Show full text]
  • Art 9 1 and Spanish Legal Framework
    To: Compliance Committee of the Aarhus Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters (1998) Via: Mr. Jeremy Wates Secretary to the Aarhus Convention United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Environment and Human Settlement Division Room 332, Palais des Nations CH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland Phone: +41 22 917 2384 Fax: +41 22 907 0107 E-mail: [email protected] From: Association for Environmental Justice (Asociacion para la Justicia Ambiental, AJA), Spain CIF: G99135014 CIF: Contact Information: – Address: P° Maria Agustin, 3, dcha. E-50004 Zaragoza, Spain Tel. + 34 976 20 20 76 Fax + 34 968 22 71 91 Contact Person: Fe Sanchis Moreno, Coordinator and Lawyer Tel. + 34 661 168 203 E-mail: [email protected] Núm.Nacional Inscripción: 586196 de Re: (Ref. ACCC/C/2008/24) Clarification requested by the Committee at the 23 rd meeting with regard to the following questions: 1.- Reasons why the Association did not challenge before the courts the lack of access to environmental information (art. 9 (1) of the Convention) 2.- Brief description of the Spanish legal system regarding environmental responsibilities 1. Reasons why the Association did not challenge before the courts the lack of access to environmental information (art. 9 (3) of the Convention) The reason is very simple the administrative and judicial appeals available for protecting the exercise of access to information rights do not comply with requirements lay down by art. 9(3) of the Aarhus Convention: they are not timely and they are prohibitively expensive. Therefore, it is easier to pay the unreasonable costs requested than to challenge the decision before the courts, especially because it can take from 5 to 8 years to get a final court decision, depending on the court responsible for.
    [Show full text]
  • Argentinian Photography During the Military Dictatorship (1976-1983)
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 9-2015 A Light in the Darkness: Argentinian Photography During the Military Dictatorship (1976-1983) Ana Tallone Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/1152 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] A LIGHT IN THE DARKNESS: ARGENTINIAN PHOTOGRAPHY DURING THE MILITARY DICTATORSHIP (1976-1983) by Ana Tallone A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Art History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2015 © 2015 Ana Tallone All Rights Reserved ! ii! This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Art History in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Katherine Manthorne _____________________ ______________________________ Date Chair of Examining Committee Rachel Kousser ______________________ ______________________________ Date Executive Officer Geoffrey Batchen Anna Indych-López Jordana Mendelson Supervisory Committee ! iii! ABSTRACT A Light in the Darkness: Argentinian Photography During the Military Dictatorship (1976-1983) by Ana Tallone Adviser: Katherine Manthorne In 2006, on the thirtieth anniversary of the military coup that brought Argentinian democracy to a halt, a group of photojournalists put together an outstanding exhibition of images from the dictatorship.1 This dissertation critically engages with the most enduring photojournalistic works produced during this period and featured in the landmark retrospective.
    [Show full text]
  • Popis Stanovnistva23
    Bosna i Hercegovina FEDERACIJA BOSNE I HERCEGOVINE FEDERALNI ZAVOD ZA STATISTIKU Bosnia and Herzegovina FEDERATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA PODRŽALA EU INSTITUTE FOR STATISTICS OF FB&H SUPPORTED BY THE EU POPIS STANOVNIŠTVA, DOMAĆINSTAVA/KUĆANSTAVA I STANOVA U BOSNI I HERCEGOVINI 2013.GODINE CENSUS OF POPULATION, HOUSEHOLDS AND DWELLINGS IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 2013 PRELIMINARNI REZULTATI PO OPĆINAMA I NASELJENIM MJESTIMA U FEDERACIJI BOSNE I HERCEGOVINE PRELIMINARY RESULTS BY MUNICIPALITIES AND SETTLEMENTS IN THE FEDERATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA STATISTIČKI BILTEN 195 195 STATISTICAL BULLETIN ISSN 1512-5106 Bosna i Hercegovina FEDERACIJA BOSNE I HERCEGOVINE FEDERALNI ZAVOD ZA STATISTIKU Bosnia and Herzegovina FEDERATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA INSTITUTE FOR STATISTICS OF FB&H POPIS STANOVNIŠTVA, DOMAĆINSTAVA/KUĆANSTAVA I STANOVA U BOSNI I HERCEGOVINI 2013.GODINE CENSUS OF POPULATION, HOUSEHOLDS AND DWELLINGS IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 2013 PRELIMINARNI REZULTATI PO OPĆINAMA I NASELJENIM MJESTIMA U FEDERACIJI BOSNE I HERCEGOVINE PRELIMINARY RESULTS BY MUNICIPALITIES AND SETTLEMENTS IN THE FEDERATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Sarajevo, decembar 2013. STATISTIČKI BILTEN 195 STATISTICAL BULLETIN 195 Izdaje i štampa/tiska: Federalni zavod za statistiku, Zelenih beretki 26, 71000 Sarajevo Published and printed: Institute for statistics of FB&H, Zelenih beretki 26, 71000 Sarajevo Telefon/Phone/Faks: +387 33 22 61 51 Elektronska pošta/E-mail:[email protected] Internetska stranica/Web site: http://www.fzs.ba Odgovara direktor: Hidajeta Bajramovi
    [Show full text]