America's Choice Between Security Interests and Democratic Values

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

America's Choice Between Security Interests and Democratic Values This document is downloaded from DR‑NTU (https://dr.ntu.edu.sg) Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Allies in crisis : America's choice between security interests and democratic values DK Nur Asyura Pg Hj Mohd Salleh 2019 DK Nur Asyura Pg Hj Mohd Salleh. (2019). Allies in crisis : America's choice between security interests and democratic values. Doctoral thesis, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/105774 https://doi.org/10.32657/10220/48830 Downloaded on 29 Sep 2021 14:10:46 SGT ALLIES IN CRISIS: AMERICA’S CHOICE BETWEEN SECURITY INTERESTS AND DEMOCRATIC VALUES DK NUR ASYURA PG HJ MOHD SALLEH S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Singapore Thesis submitted to the Nanyang Technological University in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2019 Scanned with CamScanner Authorship Attribution Statement (A) This thesis does not contain any materials from papers published in peer-reviewed journals or from papers accepted at conferences in which I am listed as an author. 20 JUNE 2019 . Date DK NUR ASYURA PG HJ MOHD SALLEH ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to extend my heartfelt gratitude to my supervisors Dr. Evan Resnick and Dr. Ralf Emmers for their close support and consistent feedback that were crucial in guiding me from the beginning of my research to the final stages of drafting. I am also extremely grateful to Dr. Farish Noor and Dr. Ian Storey for their consistent motivation and strong moral support. My sincere thanks also goes out to many people in RSIS, including Roxane and Yee Ming, whose helpful advice aided me as I navigated my way around the procedures and library resources. I would like to thank my friends and the PhD cohort for their research help and encouragement that sustained the momentum I needed to complete this thesis. I am also highly indebted to my parents, sisters, and husband Naveed Khan, who cheered and supported me all the way. Their undying belief and love fuelled the light I needed in times of struggle. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Chapter 1: Introduction………………………………...……….............. 1 2. Chapter 2: The Inductive Approach………………….…………...…… 7 2.1. Introduction……………………………...………...........................7 2.2. Literature Review……………………………...………................. 9 2.2.1. Defining Democracy……………………………...…..…. 10 2.2.2. Debates in the Democracy Promotion Literature.…..... 13 2.3. Research Methodology…………..……...………......................... 25 2.4. Conclusion……………………………...………............................. 32 3. Chapter 3: Democracy Subversion in Chile, 1970-1973………………. 35 3.1. Introduction……………………………...………........................... 35 3.2. History……………………………...………................................... 36 3.2.1. An American Ally…………………………….....……...... 37 3.2.2. Chile’s Political Crisis……………………...……............. 41 3.2.3. America's Policy Response………………………..…….. 45 3.3. Presidential Intent……………………………...…….................... 53 3.4. Influence of Senior Policymakers….………...………................. 62 3.4.1. Resistance from the Policy Doves………………………..62 3.4.2. The Nixon-Kissinger Partnership………………………..68 3.4.3. The Bureaucratic Divide…………………………………..72 3.5. Congressional Pressure…………………………………....…….. 75 3.6. Capitalist Influence………………………………...………...........78 3.7. Public Opinion and the US Media ….………...……….............. 84 3.8. Conclusion……………………………………………...….…........ 87 4. Chapter 4: Passive Democracy Promotion in South Korea, 1979 - 1980.................................................................................................... 90 4.1. Introduction……………………………...………........................... 90 4.2. History……………………………...………................................... 91 4.2.1. An American Ally……………………………...…..…...... 92 4.2.2. South Korea’s Political Crisis……………………………. 96 4.2.3. America's Policy Response…………………………..…... 102 4.3. Presidential Intent…………………………...……….................... 109 4.4. Influence of Senior Policymakers…….……...………..................114 4.4.1. Avoiding “another Iran”………………………………….115 4.4.2. Deterring North Korea……………………………………115 4.4.3. Clashing Foreign Policy Opinions……………………….116 4.4.4. Influential Individuals…………………………………….119 4.5. Congressional Pressure…..……………………………....…….....122 4.6. Capitalist Influence……………………………...……….............. 126 4.7. Public Opinion and the US Media…………………........…........ 129 4.8. Conclusion……………………………...………............................. 131 5. Chapter 5: Active Democracy Promotion in the Philippines, 1983-1986………………………………………………………………… ..136 5.1. Introduction……………………………...………......................... ..136 5.2. History……………………………...………....................................138 5.2.1. An American Ally……………………………...…….........138 5.2.2. The Philippines’ Political Crisis..………...………............141 5.2.3. America's Policy Response……………………………... ..146 5.3. Presidential Intent…………………………...……….................. ..152 5.4. Influence of Senior Policymakers….………...………..................160 5.4.1. Competing Ideologies…………………………….……….161 5.4.2. The Trigger Event……………………………………….…168 5.5. Congressional Pressure…………………………………...…….....171 5.6. Capitalist Influence…………………………………...………........175 5.7. Public Opinion and the US Media...…………...……....................181 5.8. Conclusion……………………………...………........................... ...185 6. Chapter 6: Conclusion - Analysing US Policy towards Allies in Crisis……………………………………………………………………......190 6.1. Introduction.……………………………...……….......................... 190 6.2. Domestic Actors…………………………………………………....193 6.3. Role of Ideas………………………………..…………………........197 6.4. Economic Interests………………………………………………....201 6.5. Centralising Decision-Making……….………....………...............204 6.6. Direct Access to the President……………………….…………….207 6.7. Trigger Events in the Allied State…………..……………………..210 6.8. Media-Public Opinion Nexus……………………………………..212 6.9. The Passive Democracy Promotion Policy……………………….214 6.10. Future Research Avenues………………………………………….218 6.11. Conclusion……………………………………………….……...….221 Appendix I: Acronyms……………………………...………............................. 224 Appendix II: Glossary of Persons……………………………...……….............225 LIST OF TABLES 1. Strategies that Characterise America’s Policy Responses towards States with Democratic Crises…………………………………………………..…17 2. Main Macroeconomic Variables in Chile from 1970 to 1973 (%)…….…44 3. Foreign Aid to Chile from US Government Agencies and International Institutions from 1970 to 1974 - Total of loans and grants (in millions of US dollars)…………………………………………………………………...50 4. Factors surrounding US Democracy Subversion Policy towards Chile, 1970 – 1973…………………………………………………………………...87 5. Factors surrounding US Passive Democracy Promotion Policy towards South Korea, 1979 – 1980……………………………………………...…..133 6. Factors surrounding US Active Democracy Promotion Policy towards the Philippines, 1983-1986………………………………………...……....186 7. Comparison of Factors Influencing US Policy Responses towards Allies in Crisis…………………………………………………………………..…193 LIST OF FIGURES 1. Spectrum of US Policy Responses towards Allies experiencing Democratic Crises………………………………………………………...…16 2. US Investment in Chile’s Manufacturing Industry, 1965-1970………….40 3. Imported Crude Oil Nominal Price (US$/barrel), 1978 – 1980………...110 4. US Unemployment Rate and Inflation Rate (%), 1978 – 1980………......111 ABSTRACT This study aims to highlight factors that are critical in shaping America’s different policy responses towards allies experiencing a democratic crisis. In this crisis, the population of an allied state demonstrates a severe lack of trust in the ally’s political leadership. By branching beyond international relations theory and adopting a heavily inductive approach which pursues a structured and focused comparison research method, this study investigates how various factors and domestic actors can influence different foreign policy outcomes in three case studies. These cases are America’s democracy subversion, passive democracy promotion, and active democracy promotion policy responses towards Chile, South Korea, and the Philippines respectively. This study contributes to a very important but-understudied area on US foreign policy towards democratic progress in other countries. The research also aims to contribute to policy- relevant knowledge by helping academics and policy specialists better understand America’s role in today’s shifting liberal democratic order. CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION On 25 January 2011, nationwide protests broke out across Egypt as protestors urged the authoritarian Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak to step down. Back in Washington, American policymakers were swept into a dilemma. The removal of Mubarak could impede America’s long-standing informal alliance with Egypt, which America relied on to maintain United States (US) influence and stability in the Middle East. The then US President Barack Obama needed to urgently respond to the political crisis in Egypt. Should US policymakers support the pro-democracy protestors or back the Mubarak regime? When an ally state struggles with a democratic crisis, this thesis shows that US policymakers would choose to respond in three different ways. A democratic crisis can take place when the population of a state demonstrates a severe lack of trust in the state’s political institutions and governing policymakers.1 As the state’s legitimacy and institutional strength are weakened by the public’s persistent call for a more democratic government, this can endanger the state’s capability to fulfil its commitment
Recommended publications
  • An Emerging World Power (1877-1918) American Imperialism
    Chapter 21 – An Emerging World Power (1877-1918) Motivations for Overseas Expansion Alfred T. Mahan Causes & Results of Spanish-American War Queen Liliuokalani TR & the “Rough Riders” Anti-Imperialist League Emilio Aguinaldo & Philippine-American War Teller & Platt Amendments Open Door Policy & Boxer Rebellion U.S. & Panama Canal Roosevelt Corollary “Moral Diplomacy” & Pancho Villa Causes of US Entry to WWI US WWI Military Impacts Domestic Economic Impacts of WWI CPI & “100% Americanism” Espionage & Sedition Acts African-American Great Migration Carrie Catt, Alice Paul &19th Amendment Wilson & Treaty of Versailles Article X & Rejection of Treaty THIS SLIDESHOW RELATES TO TERMS IN RED 1890-1917 (Ch. 20 & First half of Ch. 21) Long Essay Assessment (LEQ) on Monday 2/10 American Imperialism: Crash Course US History #28 First Half of Chapter 21 United States Relations with Latin America & Asia (1890-1914) Simultaneous with Domestic Progressivism How are progressive & imperialistic impulses similar? How are these similar impulses illustrated in the cartoon? United States Interventions in Latin America & Asia (1890-1914) FOUR Key Motivations for U.S. Foreign Policy Expansionist / Imperialist Foreign Policy (1890-1914) Historians argue if this was a New Imperialism or an extension of older Manifest Destiny. Arguments for both sides? 1) Military For the US to be like other “great powers” in history Alfred T. Mahan, TR & others argue for a US presence around the world to support American interests 2) Social Many in US believe White Man’s Burden philosophy that it is an American responsibility to “help” non- whites around the world. An extension of Social Darwinism philosophy popular at this time.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Affairs
    Pacific Affairs An International Review of Asia and the Pacific Editor WILLIAM L. HOLLAND Editorial Advisory Board CYRIL S. BELSHAW R. S. MILNE PETER HARNETTY E. G. PULLEYBLANK EDGAR WICKBERG Editorial Assistant MARY F. BRUNOLD Pacific Affairs is indexed by Public Affairs Information Service, Social Sciences and Humanities Index, ABC POL SCI, and Current Contents: Behavioral, Social and Management Sciences. Abstracts of articles in Pacific Affairs appear in Historical Abstracts and/or America: History and Life and International Political Science Abstracts. Abstracts of book reviews appear in Book Review Digest and Review of Reviews. Back issues are available from the business office. Pacific Affairs is published quarterly by the University of British Columbia. Editorial and business offices: University of British Columbia, Vancouver 8, Canada. Office of publication: William Byrd Press, 2901 Byrdhidl Road, Richmond, Virginia 23261, U.S.A. Second-clasi postage paid at Richmond, Va. Subscription rates: $7.00 a year, post free; single copies $2.00, post free. Copyright 1973, University of British Columbia. The articles in Pacific Affairs do not represent the views of the University of British Columbia. The Editor is responsible for the selection and acceptance of articles, but responsibility for opinions expressed in them rests with their authors. ific Affairs Vol. 46, No. I Spring 1973 Canada and the Pacific: Policies for Economic Growth T. A. Keenleyside 5 Communism and Reform in the Philippines Justus M. van der Kroef 29 Constitution-Making in Bangladesh Abut Fazl Huq 59 Continuity and Change in Japanese Foreign Policy /. A. A. Stocwn 77 A Distant and A Deadly Shore: Notes on the Literature of the Sahibs A Review Article George Woodcock 94 Book Reviews (see overleaf) Contributors to this Issue BOOKS REVIEWED IN THIS ISSUE THE CITYAS A CENTREOF CHANGEIN ASIA,edited by D.
    [Show full text]
  • Primary Document #1: the Open Door Notes (Policy) (1899-1900)
    Primary Document #1: The Open Door Notes (Policy) (1899-1900) By the late 19th century, Japan and the European powers had carved much of China into separate spheres of influence, inside of which each held economic dominance. The U.S., coming late to imperialism, held no sphere of influence in China. In 1899 U.S. Secretary of State John Hay proposed an "Open Door" policy in China in which all nations would have equal trading and development rights throughout all of China. Such a policy would put all the imperialist powers on equal footing in China and would limit the advantages of having one’s own sphere of influence. As you read, think about how the Open Door policy might be seen as noble and fair, and think about how it also reflects American political and economic self-interest. Document A: The Open Door Notes (Policy) Earnestly desirous to remove any cause of irritation and to insure at the same time to the commerce of all nations in China... [the United States urges all nations claiming a sphere of influence in China to declare] that [all nations] shall enjoy perfect equality of treatment for their commerce and navigation within such spheres.... We adhere to the policy... of peace with the Chinese nation, of furtherance of lawful commerce, and of protection of lives and property of our citizens by all means.... The policy of the Government of the United States is to seek a solution which may bring about permanent safety and peace to China, preserve Chinese territorial and administrative entity, protect all rights guaranteed to friendly powers by treaty and international law, and safeguard for the world the principle of equal and impartial trade with all parts of the Chinese Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Lose in Vietnam, Bring Our Boys Home'
    Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons Faculty Publications 2004 ‘Lose in Vietnam, Bring Our Boys Home’ Robert N. Strassfeld Case Western Reserve University - School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/faculty_publications Part of the Law Commons Repository Citation Strassfeld, Robert N., "‘Lose in Vietnam, Bring Our Boys Home’" (2004). Faculty Publications. 267. https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/faculty_publications/267 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. "LOSE IN VIETNAM, BRING THE BOYS HOME" ROBERTN. STRASSFELD. This Article examines the contest over dissent and loyalty during the Vietnam War. The Johnson and Nixon Administrations used an array of weapons to discourage or silence antiwar opposition. These included crinLinal prosecutions for "disloyal speech," a tool that they used with less frequency than s01ne other administrations in times of war; prosecutions for other "crimes" that served as pretext for prosecuting disloyal speech; infiltration and harassment; and an attempt to characterize their critics as disloyal. The antiwar movement, in turn, responded to allegations that dissent equaled disloyalty by offering an alternative vision of loyalty and patriotism. In so doing, they recast notions of allegiance, betrayal, support of the troops, and our obligations in the face of conflicting loyalties. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 1892 I. THE USES OF LOYALTY IN THE VIETNAM WAR ERA ........... 1894 A. The Model of Legal Repression: The World War I Experience ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sounding Off: Folksong, Poetry, and Other Cognitive
    SOUNDING OFF: FOLKSONG, POETRY, AND OTHER COGNITIVE DISSONANCE FROM THE AMERICAN WAR IN VIETNAM A Dissertation by MATTHEW KIRK IRWIN Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Chair of Committee, Terry H. Anderson Committee Members, David Vaught John Lenihan William Bedford Clark Head of Department, David Vaught December 2014 Major Subject: History Copyright 2014 Matthew Kirk Irwin ABSTRACT Among works treating Vietnam War history, few mention and none address extensively the folk culture that American and Vietnamese military forces produced. To bridge gaps between traditional and cultural primary sources, this study examines folk culture that the historiography has neglected: graffiti, folksongs, and poetry. Most were conceived and produced in-country, near in time to specific wartime experiences and their consequent emotions, thus lending them an emotional relevance and chronological proximity to Vietnam War history few other primary sources can boast. Graffiti, songs, and poems derived from specific historical contexts, registering social commentary and chronicling the cognitive dissonance that arose among combatants when their coveted, long-held, patriotic mythologies collided with wartime realities. These sources document the Vietnam War’s “inner-history”—the emotions, beliefs, concerns, and emotions of particular individuals, many of whom find voice virtually nowhere else in the historiographical canon. What folk culture lacks in terms of scope and scale vis-à-vis traditional sources, it abounds with in physical description, emotional narration, honesty, and transparency. Its value to historical inquiry lies in its tendency to pull no punches—ever.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Culture and Thailand's Response to Vietnam's Occupation of Cambodia, 1979–1989
    Strategic Culture and Thailand’s Response to Vietnam’s Occupation of Cambodia, 1979–1989 A Cold War Epilogue ✣ Gregory V. Raymond Thailand’s Cold War role is usually seen through the prism of its support for the U.S. wars in Indochina. Serving as an unsinkable aircraft carrier, Thailand hosted as many as 48,000 U.S. troops for operations in neighboring Laos and Vietnam.1 In exchange, Thailand received U.S. military assistance on a mas- sive scale. From 1951 to 1971, this assistance totaled $935 million, equivalent to 50 percent of the Thai military’s own budget for the same period.2 U.S. mil- itary aid allowed construction of a deep-water port at Sattahip and an airbase at nearby Utapao supporting B-52 missions from 1967.3 But after President Richard Nixon’s enunciation of the Guam Doctrine in 1969 and the fall of Saigon in 1975, U.S. troops departed from Thailand and Indochina. Most were gone by 1976.4 This separation was more than physical. A recently declassified intelligence assessment reveals that neighbor- ing Australia saw the United States as increasingly detached from the arena: “since the Vietnam War, the United States has not behaved as though it had any important national interest at stake in Indochina.”5 This suggests that, 1. Donald Kirk, Wider War: The Struggle for Cambodia, Thailand and Laos (New York: Praeger Pub- lishers, 1971), pp. 179, 181. 2. Chai-Anan Samudavanija, Kusuma Snitwongse, and Suchit Bunbongkarn, From Armed Suppression to Political Offensive: Attitudinal Transformation of Thai Military Officers since 1976 (Bangkok: Institute of Security and International Studies, Chulalongkorn University, 1990), p.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit: American Imperialism Page # 43
    Unit: American Imperialism Page # 43 Objectives: 1. Define and explain the Roosevelt Corollary and how TR used the big stick 2. Explain how the Panama Canal was annexed by the US and how TR used the big stick 3. Define and explain Taft’s Dollar Diplomacy and why it was imperialistic 4. Define and explain Wilson’s Moral Diplomacy and how he became a hypocrite V. United States and Latin America A. Where is Latin America? 1. Any nation Mexico and South B. Roosevelt Corollary 1. Is an extension of the Monroe Doctrine a. To keep out foreign nations 2. TR believed that it was the US’s job to restore law and order a. US should be able to intervene anytime in Latin America b. The US was to become a international police force 3. He uses this idea when European nations tried to expand influence in Latin America 4. To enforce this corollary TR uses the navy a. This will be called the big stick policy b. TR would “Speak softly but carry a big stick ” c. Used in 1) Nicaragua 2) Dominican Republic 3) Helped to start a revolt in Panama 5. US wanted a shorter path to trade and military a. Found that the Panama Isthmus was the shortest route b. The land was owned by Columbia c. TR tries to buy the land but Columbia refuses d. TR then allows the War Department to send hints that the US will support a revolt e. To ensure the revolt TR sends the Big Stick f. The US then takes over the canal started by France g.
    [Show full text]
  • The Teapot Dome Scandal
    CONSTITUTIONALRIGHTSFOUNDATION SPRING 2009BILLOFRIGHTSINACTIONVOLUME 24 NUMBER 4 The Teapot Dome Scandal The Teapot Dome scandal unfolded in the 1920s during the presidency of Warren Harding. It remains one of the most shocking stories of government corruption. President Harding died in office before most of the scan- dal became public. As the Senate investigated the scan- dal, the press and the public demanded to know how two of the richest oil barons in the country had bribed gov- ernment officials to obtain leases to oil fields on govern- ment land. It took six years, two civil trials, and six criminal trials to track down what one senator called “the slimiest of slimy trails beaten by privilege.” y the end of World War I, the demand for oil was grow- ing. During the war, the U.S. and British navies con- vertedB their ships from coal to oil. Cars were rolling off the assembly lines in huge numbers. By 1920, oil production had soared to 450 million barrels in the U.S., and the oil industry was booming. One man who made huge profits from the oil boom was The Teapot Dome scandal seemed to lead directly to the White House. Edward Doheny. Doheny struck oil in April 1893 near the The only person ultimately convicted of criminal charges was Harding’s La Brea Tar Pits in Los Angeles, and within a year had 81 secretary of the interior,Albert Fall. (Library of Congress) wells pumping in Los Angeles. By 1916, he had expanded the navy. Three Naval Petroleum Reserves were created in his oil empire into Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • William Howard Taft and Dollar Diplomacy
    WILLIAM HOWARD TAFT AND DOLLAR DIPLOMACY - Roosevelt's successor, William Taft (1909-1913), did not carry a big stick - Taft adopted a foreign policy that was mildly expansionist but depended more on investors' dollars than on the navy's battleships - Taft's policy of trying to promote U.S. trade by supporting American enterprises abroad was given the name dollar diplomacy DOLLAR DIPLOMACY IN EAST ASIA AND LATIN AMERICA - Taft believed that private American financial investment in China & the nations of Central America would lead to greater stability there, while at the same time promoting U.S. business interests - Taft's policy was thwarted by one major obstacle: growing anti-imperialism both in the U.S. & overseas RAILROADS IN CHINA - Taft wanted U.S. bankers to be included in a British, French, and German plan to invest in railroads in China & Taft succeeded in securing American participation in an agreement signed in 1911 - In the northern province of Manchuria, however, the U.S., was excluded from an agreement between Russia & Japan to build railroads there - In direct defiance of the U.S. Open Door policy, Russian & Japan agreed to treat Manchuria as a jointly held sphere of influence INTERVENTION IN NICARAGUA - To protect U.S. investments, the U.S. intervened in Nicaragua's financial affairs in 1911, & sent in marines when a civil war broke out in 1912 - The marines remained, except for a short period, until 1933 THE LODGE COROLLARY - Henry Cabot Lodge, a Republican senator from Massachusetts, was responsible for another action
    [Show full text]
  • Malcolm Caldwell: Pol Pot’S Apologist
    Malcolm Caldwell: Pol Pot’s Apologist Michael Ezra I Malcolm Caldwell, Scottish Marxist academic at the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London (SOAS) was born in 1931. A lifelong man of the left, he had been the Chairman of the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament and a long-term member of the Labour Party [1] – even standing as a Labour candidate in the 1977 local elections in Bexley, Kent. [2] He had also been selected by Bertrand Russell to be on the founding board of a radical monthly magazine The Spokesman that was supported by the Russell Foundation. [3] He was known to make some absurd and preposterous prophecies, claiming that by the 1990s there would be no oil left in the world [4] and that by the mid-1980s, Scotland would be independent of England. [5] But Caldwell was most in his element when writing about ‘the demonstrated strengths of the communist system.’ [6] With a persuasive ability, he helped to transform at least one person’s ‘anti-authoritarianism – and love of ordinary people – into a fierce and angry communism.’ [7] Whilst he ultimately became known for his support for the Communist regime in Cambodia, [8] Pol Pot was not the only despotic dictator to garner his approval. Kim Il-Sung’s North Korea, Caldwell believed, was ‘an astonishing tribute not only to the energy, initiative and creativeness of the Korean people, but also to the essential correctness of the Juche line.’ No non-’free world’ country that he had visited (including China) had ‘impressed’ him more ‘in terms of its all-round economic achievements.’ [9] On a report of a trip he made to North Korea, his astute political analysis included the observation that ‘the female military uniform is quite attractive: fitted tunic and pleated skirt.’ [10] Caldwell had gone further than vocal critics against the war in Vietnam; he wanted North Vietnam to win.
    [Show full text]
  • August 2018 · Volume 50 · No
    The magazine of The Foreign Correspondents’ Club of Japan August 2018 · Volume 50 · No. 8 Back in the Day: Covering East Asia from Japan Memoirs: Mr. Smith Goes to Tokyo (Part 5) Record Flight: The Original Kamikaze Story Exploring Other Worlds JAXA’s Hayabusa2 Space Probe Reaches Asteroid Ryugu New MembershipCampaign Dining Voucher ¥5,000 to For Introducing ¥20,000 A New Member ¥20,000 Five-Year Associate member ¥10,000 Outside Kanto Associate member ¥5,000 Outside Kanto Regular or Outside Kanto P/J Associate member THE FOREIGN CORRESPONDENTS’ CLUB OF JAPAN Yurakucho Denki Building North 20F, 1-7-1 Yurakucho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-0006, Japan www.fccj.or.jp E-mail: [email protected] Tel: +81-3-3211-3161 Fax: +81-3-3211-3168 Terms & Conditions of Dining Certificate 1) and whose membership is paid-in-full immediately after membership confirmation. 2) Only one certificate per new member will be issued. In case of multiple claims, reward may be split. 3) Certificate may be redeemed at Pen & Quill Dining Room, Main Bar and Masukomi Sushi Bar during the campaign period. 4) Certificate cannot be credited to member’s account and is valid for one use only. 5) Any unused portion of the value is non-refundable. The certificate holder is liable for any amount consumed in excess of the value of the certificate. 6) Certificate valid for 6 months and is non-transferable. FCCJ may end promotion at any time. Please check with the oce to confirm still active. AUGUST 2018 | FCCJ | 03 In This Issue August 2018 · Volume 50 · No.
    [Show full text]
  • Southeast Asia Program 1987 Bulletin Cornell University
    Southeast Asia Program 1987 Bulletin Cornell University SEAP ARCHIVE COPY DO NOT REMOVE Southeast Asia Program 1987 Bulletin Contents From the Director 2 Professor Gerard Diffloth 3 Cornell Blue Laughter: Perceptions of Reality Thomas W. Leavitt 5 Vietnamese Ceramics in the Herbert F. Johnson University Museum of Art at Cornell Stanley J. O'Connor 6 On Studying Vietnam Christine Pelzer White 8 Catching Up with Each Other, Indonesian-Cornellian Style Daniel Dhakidac 11 Program Publications 12 About Program People 13 Published by the outhcast Asia Program, Cover design: a Vietnamese sixteenth­ Cornell University, 988 century dish in the Herbert F. Johnson Museum of Art. Decorated in under­ Edited by Stanley J. O'Connor ...,_ai::.::~-:.::=..--;...:J glaze cobalt blue. Center medallion Designed by Deena Wickstrom with lotus wreath framed by a border of interrupted classic scrolls; cavetto with Produced by the Office of Publications Services, six peonies in a floral scroll. Evened rim Cornell University with classic scroll. Diameter: 37.5 cm. Gift of Rebecca Hayivard frodin and The photographs of the Vietnamese ceramics and of Gerard Reuben Frodin in memory of Ralph Diffloth were taken by Helen Kelley, and those of Blue Baker HaJ~vard '99 and George Cafoin Laughter are courtesy of the artist. Hayward '30. From the Director Dear Friends, of the 1987 Masayoshi Ohira Memorial Prize for his I am pleased to be able to report that, one severe pathbreaking book Solo in the New Order (Princeton, setback aside, 1986-87 was a good year for the program 1986). This prize, established in 1985 in memory of the faculty and students.
    [Show full text]