DOCSLIB.ORG

Revisionism and Vietnam

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Revisionism and Vietnam Vietnam Generation Volume 1 Number 1 The Future of the Past: Revisionism and Article 1 Vietnam 1-1989 The uturF e of the Past: Revisionism and Vietnam Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.lasalle.edu/vietnamgeneration Part of the American Studies Commons Recommended Citation (1989) "The uturF e of the Past: Revisionism and Vietnam," Vietnam Generation: Vol. 1 : No. 1 , Article 1. Available at: http://digitalcommons.lasalle.edu/vietnamgeneration/vol1/iss1/1 This Complete Volume is brought to you for free and open access by La Salle University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vietnam Generation by an authorized editor of La Salle University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Vietnam Generation V o I u m e 1 W in t e r 1989 NuvibER 1 2 iNTROdUGTiON Kaii Tal. Editor 4 The A m eric a n BoMbARdMENT of K a m puc h ea , 1969-1975 Ben Kiernan, University of Wollongong. Australia 42 iNflATioNARy I m p a c t o f t He V ietn a m W a r Tom Riddell. Smith College 61 I n Cold Blood: TH e V ietn a m W a r iN T e x t books David Berman. University of Pittsburgh 81 Tw o Quiet A m e r ic a n s: B R iTis h L it e r a t u r e iNTO A m eric a n PRopAqANdA Mariam Darce Frenier. University of Minnesota at Morris 94 F iR S T Blood REdRAWN Don Kunz, University of Rhode Island 115 A HuNdREd HAppy S p a r r o w s : A n A m eric a n V e te r a n R e tu r n s t o Vietn a m Larry Lee Rottman,Southwest Missouri State University 141 DispuTiNq t He W r e c Ka q e: IdEoloqicAl STRUqqlE AT t He VIETNAM VETERANS MEMORiAl Harry Haines. Trinity College 157 O n t He Co v er o f t He R o lllN q S to n e : TowARd a TH e o r y o f Cu I t u r a I TH e r a p y Kali Tal iNTROdlJCTiON K aLi T aL I am proud to introduce the first issue of Vietnam Generation: A Journal of Recent History and Contemporary Issues. We have put together a very fine collection of articles, representing disciplines as diverse as economics, literature, education, sociology, history, film, and popularculture. Each article also representsan individual response to the highly charged term 'revisionism'. Ben Kiernan's article, "The American Bombardment of Kampuchea, 1969-1973', is an example of classic revisionist scholarship — the revision of historical narrative based on new or reinterpreted information. Tom Riddell's article, "The Inflationary Impact of the Vietnam W ar', also deals with revisionism in the classic sense: Riddell challenges the revisionist scholarship of economists Walker and Vatter, and charges that their reinterpretations of the past are ill-founded. David Berman's article. "In Cold Blood: Vietnam in Textbooks' takes a historiographical approach toward revision, and examines the way in which historical narratives are rewritten over time. Mariam Frenier, in "Two Quiet Americans: Turning British Literature into American Propaganda', and Don Kunz, in “First Blood Redrawn,' examine the revision of popular concepts of history through the mediums of literature and film. Larry Rottmann, in "One Hundred Happy Sparrows: An American Veteran Returns to Vietnam', explores the personal revision process as he describes his emotional journey. Harry Haines, in “Disputing the Wreckage: IdeologicalStruggleatthe Vietnam Veterans Memorial', demonstrates how the process of of personal revision intersects with the generation of public history at the site of the Vietnam Memorial in Washington, DC. My own article, "On the Cover of the Rolling Stone: Toward a Theory of Cultural Therapy', deals with the cause and effect of the revisionist impulse, and suggests a new approach to the problem. Despite the high calibre of the individual articles represented in this collection, it is apparent that articles on a number of topics are conspicuously absent. Included here are no papers devoted to the topics of race or gender and the Vietnam War, no papers which deal with Vietnamese perceptions of the American presence in Vietnam, no papers on the POW-MIA obsession, and no papers on the subject of these subjects are absent that they are inconseguential. What is missing is often at least as important as what is included. Introduction 3 There is only one article by a woman in this issue. There are no articles by Vietnamese scholars; in fact, there are no articles by non­ white men. This imbalance cries outforan explanation. It is not enough merely to say that no papers were submitted by men or women of color. It is not enough to say that only three papers were submitted by white women scholars, and that we accepted one of them for publi­ cation. We cannot excuse ourselves for failing to include these perspectives by saying that we would have been open to publishing the m if they had been submitted. Vietnam Generation is intended to provide a forum for Viet­ nam War, Vietnam era. and Vietnam generation scholars. If our field, at this point in time, is so narrow that it does not include the work of scholars of color, or of women, then we must broaden our topic area until it does include this work. We are devoting one issue this first year to an exploration of race issues and Vietnam, and another issue to a study on gender and war. But even this is not enough. We are committed to make a sincere and consistent effort to incorporate questions of race and gender into every issue of Vietnam Generation. In the future we will not simply wait forthese articles to come to us in the mail; we will make a direct effort to solicit them. And if. at tim es, we fail to present these alternative views, we will always try to be honest about what we have not published, careful to point out the missing articles in our table of contents. The A m erican BoMbARdMENT of K a m puc Nea, 1969-197? B en KiERNAN On March 18,1969, the United States Air Force began its secret B-52 bombardment of rural Cambodia'. Exactly one year later, that country's ruler. Prince Norodom Sihanouk, was overthrown and the Vietnam War, combined with a new civil war, to tear the nation apart for the next five years. The United States bombing of the countryside continued (now publicly) and increased from 1970 to August 1973. when Congress imposed a halt. Nearly half of the US bombing tonnage was dropped in the last six months. The total was 540,000 tons. Rural Cambodia was destroyed, and 'Democratic Kampuchea' rose in its ashes. The emergent Communist Party of Kampuchea (CPK) regime, led by Pol Pot, had profited greatly from the U.S. bombing. It used the widespread devastation and massacre of civilians as propaganda for recruitment purposes, and as an excuse for its brutal, radical policies and its purge of moderate Khmer communists. This is evident not only from contemporary press accounts, but also from post-1978 interviews with dozens of peasant survivors of the bombing who were unable to testify to their experiences during the Pol Pot period, and from U.S. Government documents newly declassified under the Freedom of Information Act. By October 1972 the US and Hanoi had reached agreement on terms for a ceasefire and American withdrawal from Vietnam. Washington had dropped its demand for a North Vietnamese withdrawal from the south, and Hanoi had dropped its demand for Nguyen Van Thieu's removal. Both demands had previously been preconditions for a settlement. Henry Kissinger, of course, still insisted on Hanoi securing, from Pol Pot's CPK 'Center', agreement to a settlement in Kampuchea as well. But it would have been clearto him that this would be impossible, despite his own stated threat to achieve it by concentrating US air power in Kampuchea2. The antagonism of the CPK Center (the Party's national leadership — Pol Pot, Nuon Chea. and leng Sary) to Hanoi made it very unlikely that the CPK would coordinate its strategy with that of Vietnam. Further, a ceasefire in Kampuchea would have prevented the Center consolidating what it called its “ mastery over the revolutionary group(s) in every way", which was far from complete. American Bombardment 5 Sihanoukists. moderates, and pro-Vietnamese communists still predominated in the rural areas. As CPK Southwest Zone documents had explained in 1971, “We want to and must get a tight grasp, fitter into every corner'3 of the diverse revolutionary movement in the Kampuchean countryside. A negotiated peace, or even an early victory, would not serve this aim. In Vietnam,Thieu was also proving recalcitrant. It was apparently to appease him that Nixon ordered the “Christmas Bombing' of Hanoi and Haiphong in December 1972. Within a month, the Paris Agreement on Ending the War and Restoring Peace in Vietnam had been signed by all parties to the conflict there. It was to apply from January 27,1973 (and its terms were little different from those agreed in October)4. The USA began withdrawing its troops from Vietnam. However, it saw Kampuchea as an integral part of the conflict, and as fighting continued the US soon switched the rest of its air arm there. Washington portrayed this bombardment as an attempt to force the Khmer insurgents, now on the threshold of complete military victory, to negotiate with Lon Nol's pro-American government in Phnom Penh.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Copyright by Nhu Quynh-Thuy Truong 2009
    Copyright by Nhu Quynh-Thuy Truong 2009 Renewing Political Legitimacy: Pragmatic Reforms and Doi Moi by Nhu Quynh-Thuy Truong, B.A. Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Asian Studies The University of Texas at Austin May 2009 Renewing Political Legitimacy: Pragmatic Reforms and Doi Moi Approved by Supervising Committee: Abstract Renewing Political Legitimacy: Pragmatic Reforms and Doi Moi Nhu Quynh-Thuy Truong, M.A. The University of Texas at Austin, 2009 Supervisors: Huaiyin Li & William Hurst The Vietnamese Communist Party (VCP) first launched Doi Moi [Renovation] in 1986— 10 years after the VCP officially assumed power in 1976 of the Socialist Republics of Vietnam. As the VCP describes, Doi Moi is a comprehensive economic reform package with new initiatives toward building ―a mixed economy‖ that introduces ―market mechanism with state management and a socialist orientation‖ to Vietnam‘s economy. With Doi Moi, pragmatism has evidently taken center stage in place of dogmatic concerns for ideological correctness. The thesis seeks to first examine the conditions and factors that gave impetus for the economic reforms in Vietnam. These conditions and factors are especially evident when they are examined in a comparative context with the Soviet Union and China‘s experiences with similar reforms as they are done here in the thesis. Moreover, the change of orientation from a centrally planned economy to market-oriented economy is reflected in Doi Moi‘s decentralization and economic liberalization reforms as well as the VCP‘s opening up to international reintegration and reconciliation with namely the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of the Anlong Veng Community a History Of
    A HIstoRy Of Anlong Veng CommunIty A wedding in Anlong Veng in the early 1990s. (Cover photo) Aer Vietnamese forces entered Cambodia in 1979, many Khmer Rouge forces scaered to the jungles, mountains, and border areas. Mountain 1003 was a prominent Khmer Rouge military base located within the Dangrek Mountains along the Cambodian-Thai border, not far from Anlong Veng. From this military base, the Khmer Rouge re-organized and prepared for the long struggle against Vietnamese and the People’s Republic of Kampuchea government forces. Eventually, it was from this base, Khmer Rouge forces would re-conquer and sele Anlong Veng in early 1990 (and a number of other locations) until their re-integration into Cambodian society in late 1998. In many ways, life in Anlong Veng was as difficult and dangerous as it was in Mountain 1003. As one of the KR strongholds, Anlong Veng served as one of the key launching points for Khmer Rouge guerrilla operations in Cambodia, and it was subject to constant aacks by Cambodian government forces. Despite the perilous circumstances and harsh environment, the people who lived in Anlong Veng endeavored, whenever possible, to re-connect with and maintain their rich cultural heritage. Tossed from the seat of power in 1979, the Khmer Rouge were unable to sustain their rigid ideo- logical policies, particularly as it related to community and family life. During the Democratic Movement of the Khmer Rouge Final Stronghold Kampuchea regime, 1975–79, the Khmer Rouge prohibited the traditional Cambodian wedding ceremony. Weddings were arranged by Khmer Rouge leaders and cadre, who oen required mass ceremonies, with lile regard for tradition or individual distinction.
    [Show full text]
  • To Keep You Is No Gain, to Kill You Is No Loss* – Securing Justice Through the International Criminal Court
    TO KEEP YOU IS NO GAIN, TO KILL YOU IS NO LOSS* – SECURING JUSTICE THROUGH THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT Talitha Gray** I. INTRODUCTION “We who have witnessed in the twentieth century, the worst crimes against humanity, have an opportunity to bequeath to the new century a powerful instrument of justice. So let us rise to this challenge.”1 An incomprehensible number of people have died as a result of war crimes, genocide, and crimes against humanity in the last century. After World War II and the Holocaust, nations and their citizenry proclaimed that never again would something so horrendous happen. “We must make sure that their deaths have posthumous meaning. We must make sure that from now until the end of days all humankind stares this evil in the face . and only then can we be sure it will never arise again.”2 Despite this vow, from 1950 to 1990, there were seventeen genocides, with two that resulted in the death of over a million people.3 In 1994, 800,000 Tutsis died during a three-month genocide in Rwanda.4 Genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity are not only something that occurred in the distant past; sadly, they remain a vivid reality. If there is ever hope to end such crimes, they must be addressed by the law on an international scale. “We stand poised at the edge of invention: a rare occasion to build a new institution to serve a global need. An International Criminal Court is within our * This phrase is identified as the motto of the Khmer Rouge regime who murdered in excess of two million Cambodians during their three year reign.
    [Show full text]
  • Living Under Drones Death, Injury, and Trauma to Civilians from US Drone Practices in Pakistan
    Fall 08 September 2012 Living Under Drones Death, Injury, and Trauma to Civilians From US Drone Practices in Pakistan International Human Rights and Conflict Resolution Clinic Stanford Law School Global Justice Clinic http://livingunderdrones.org/ NYU School of Law Cover Photo: Roof of the home of Faheem Qureshi, a then 14-year old victim of a January 23, 2009 drone strike (the first during President Obama’s administration), in Zeraki, North Waziristan, Pakistan. Photo supplied by Faheem Qureshi to our research team. Suggested Citation: INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION CLINIC (STANFORD LAW SCHOOL) AND GLOBAL JUSTICE CLINIC (NYU SCHOOL OF LAW), LIVING UNDER DRONES: DEATH, INJURY, AND TRAUMA TO CIVILIANS FROM US DRONE PRACTICES IN PAKISTAN (September, 2012) TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I ABOUT THE AUTHORS III EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS V INTRODUCTION 1 METHODOLOGY 2 CHALLENGES 4 CHAPTER 1: BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT 7 DRONES: AN OVERVIEW 8 DRONES AND TARGETED KILLING AS A RESPONSE TO 9/11 10 PRESIDENT OBAMA’S ESCALATION OF THE DRONE PROGRAM 12 “PERSONALITY STRIKES” AND SO-CALLED “SIGNATURE STRIKES” 12 WHO MAKES THE CALL? 13 PAKISTAN’S DIVIDED ROLE 15 CONFLICT, ARMED NON-STATE GROUPS, AND MILITARY FORCES IN NORTHWEST PAKISTAN 17 UNDERSTANDING THE TARGET: FATA IN CONTEXT 20 PASHTUN CULTURE AND SOCIAL NORMS 22 GOVERNANCE 23 ECONOMY AND HOUSEHOLDS 25 ACCESSING FATA 26 CHAPTER 2: NUMBERS 29 TERMINOLOGY 30 UNDERREPORTING OF CIVILIAN CASUALTIES BY US GOVERNMENT SOURCES 32 CONFLICTING MEDIA REPORTS 35 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Parry Wins 2017 Martha Gellhorn Prize for Journalism
    Robert Parry Wins 2017 Martha Gellhorn Prize for Journalism John Pilger made the following remarks in presenting the 15th Martha Gellhorn Prize to the American journalist Robert Parry at a dinner in London on 27 June. By John Pilger Region: USA Global Research, June 29, 2017 Theme: Media Disinformation, Police State & Civil Rights Featured image: American Journalist Robert Parry (Source: Consortiumnews) There are too many awards for journalism. Too many simply celebrate the status quo. The idea that journalists ought to challenge the status quo — what Orwell called Newspeak and Robert Parry calls ‘groupthink’ — is becoming increasingly rare. More than a generation ago, a space opened up for a journalism that dissented from the groupthink and flourished briefly and often tenuously in the press and broadcasting. Today, that space has almost closed in the so-called mainstream media. The best journalists have become – often against their will — dissidents. The Martha Gellhorn Prize for Journalism recognises these honourable exceptions. It is very different from other prizes. Let me quote in full why we give this award: ‘The Gellhorn Prize is in honour of one of the 20th century’s greatest reporters. It is awarded to a journalist whose work has penetrated the established version of events and told an unpalatable truth – a truth validated by powerful facts that expose whatMartha Gellhorn called “official drivel”. She meant establishment propaganda.’ Journalist Martha Gellhorn (Source: Bio.com) | 1 Martha was renowned as a war reporter. Her dispatches from Spain in the 1930s and D-Day in 1944 are classics. But she was more than that.
    [Show full text]
  • China, Cambodia, and the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence: Principles and Foreign Policy
    China, Cambodia, and the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence: Principles and Foreign Policy Sophie Diamant Richardson Old Chatham, New York Bachelor of Arts, Oberlin College, 1992 Master of Arts, University of Virginia, 2001 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Politics University of Virginia May, 2005 !, 11 !K::;=::: .' P I / j ;/"'" G 2 © Copyright by Sophie Diamant Richardson All Rights Reserved May 2005 3 ABSTRACT Most international relations scholarship concentrates exclusively on cooperation or aggression and dismisses non-conforming behavior as anomalous. Consequently, Chinese foreign policy towards small states is deemed either irrelevant or deviant. Yet an inquiry into the full range of choices available to policymakers shows that a particular set of beliefs – the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence – determined options, thus demonstrating the validity of an alternative rationality that standard approaches cannot apprehend. In theoretical terms, a belief-based explanation suggests that international relations and individual states’ foreign policies are not necessarily determined by a uniformly offensive or defensive posture, and that states can pursue more peaceful security strategies than an “anarchic” system has previously allowed. “Security” is not the one-dimensional, militarized state of being most international relations theory implies. Rather, it is a highly subjective, experience-based construct, such that those with different experiences will pursue different means of trying to create their own security. By examining one detailed longitudinal case, which draws on extensive archival research in China, and three shorter cases, it is shown that Chinese foreign policy makers rarely pursued options outside the Five Principles.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Affairs
    Pacific Affairs An International Review of Asia and the Pacific Editor WILLIAM L. HOLLAND Editorial Advisory Board CYRIL S. BELSHAW R. S. MILNE PETER HARNETTY E. G. PULLEYBLANK EDGAR WICKBERG Editorial Assistant MARY F. BRUNOLD Pacific Affairs is indexed by Public Affairs Information Service, Social Sciences and Humanities Index, ABC POL SCI, and Current Contents: Behavioral, Social and Management Sciences. Abstracts of articles in Pacific Affairs appear in Historical Abstracts and/or America: History and Life and International Political Science Abstracts. Abstracts of book reviews appear in Book Review Digest and Review of Reviews. Back issues are available from the business office. Pacific Affairs is published quarterly by the University of British Columbia. Editorial and business offices: University of British Columbia, Vancouver 8, Canada. Office of publication: William Byrd Press, 2901 Byrdhidl Road, Richmond, Virginia 23261, U.S.A. Second-clasi postage paid at Richmond, Va. Subscription rates: $7.00 a year, post free; single copies $2.00, post free. Copyright 1973, University of British Columbia. The articles in Pacific Affairs do not represent the views of the University of British Columbia. The Editor is responsible for the selection and acceptance of articles, but responsibility for opinions expressed in them rests with their authors. ific Affairs Vol. 46, No. I Spring 1973 Canada and the Pacific: Policies for Economic Growth T. A. Keenleyside 5 Communism and Reform in the Philippines Justus M. van der Kroef 29 Constitution-Making in Bangladesh Abut Fazl Huq 59 Continuity and Change in Japanese Foreign Policy /. A. A. Stocwn 77 A Distant and A Deadly Shore: Notes on the Literature of the Sahibs A Review Article George Woodcock 94 Book Reviews (see overleaf) Contributors to this Issue BOOKS REVIEWED IN THIS ISSUE THE CITYAS A CENTREOF CHANGEIN ASIA,edited by D.
    [Show full text]
  • Racial Ideology and Implementation of the Khmer Rouge Genocide
    Racial Ideology and Implementation of the Khmer Rouge Genocide Abby Coomes, Jonathan Dean, Makinsey Perkins, Jennifer Roberts, Tyler Schroeder, Emily Simpson Abstract Indochina Implementation In the 1970s Pol Pot devised a ruthless Cambodian regime Communism in Cambodia began as early as the 1940s during known as the Khmer Rouge. The Khmer Rouge adopted a strong the time of Joseph Stalin. Its presence was elevated when Pol Pot sense of nationalism and discriminated against the Vietnamese and became the prime minister and leader of the Khmer Rouge. In 1975, other racial minorities in Cambodia. This form of radical Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge implemented their new government communism led to the Cambodian genocide because the Khmer the Democratic Kampuchea. This government was meant to replace Rouge cleansed the minorities of their culture and committed mass the existing one in every way possible by any means necessary. murder amongst their people in order to establish power. Pol Pot The Khmer Rouge imposed a forced cleansing of Cambodia, both in established the Democratic Kampuchea which forced what he culture and race. This meant that the Cambodian minorities were to called the “New People” to work on the farms and in the factories. be weeded out, tortured, and murdered. This was called the Four The Khmer Rouge went as far as to convert the schools into Year Plan. prisons and destroyed all traces of books and equipment to rid The Khmer Rouge started by separating the minority groups Cambodia of their education system. This project will analyze how within the country. The Khmer Rouge wedged a division between Pol Pot’s regime created systematic racism amongst the the urban and rural populations, categorizing between the “New Cambodian minorities and developed a social hierarchy.
    [Show full text]
  • English Magazine Truth 27
    ENGLISH MAGAZINE TRUTH 27 Cyan Magenta Yellow Black 100 100 100 100 100 100 50 50 50 50 Searching for the truth. Magazine of Documentation Center of Cambodia Table of Contents Number 27, March 2002 Victim LETTER If We Fail .....................................................................1 DOCUMENTATION Ke Pauk Defended Himself .......................................2 Selected Confessions and Telegrams ........................8 Was There Criminal Intent? ....................................12 Master Genocide Site Data .....................................14 KR View of Family..................................................16 Cambodia’s 1976 Elections .....................................20 List of Prisoners Smashed at S-21 ..........................21 HISTORY Khmer Rouge Documents Discovered .......................23 A Job Done in Exchange for Survival .......................26 Voices from S-21 ....................................................28 Documentary Photographs .....................................32 LEGAL East Timor’s Special Panel ......................................34 PUBLIC DEBATE Copyright © Thoughts on the United Nations Decision ..............39 Documentation Center of Cambodia Was Amnesty the Price for Peace in Cambodia? ....41 50 All rights reserved. A Bad Omen for the Victims of the KR? ................42 Licensed by the Ministry of Information of 50 Statement from the Royal Government ..................44 the Royal Government of Cambodia, 50 Prakas No.0291 P.M99 50 2 August 1999. FAMILY TRACING 100 Love for
    [Show full text]
  • The American Bombardment of Kampuchea, 1969-1973 Ben Kiernan
    Vietnam Generation Volume 1 Number 1 The Future of the Past: Revisionism and Article 3 Vietnam 1-1989 The American Bombardment of Kampuchea, 1969-1973 Ben Kiernan Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.lasalle.edu/vietnamgeneration Part of the American Studies Commons Recommended Citation Kiernan, Ben (1989) "The American Bombardment of Kampuchea, 1969-1973," Vietnam Generation: Vol. 1 : No. 1 , Article 3. Available at: http://digitalcommons.lasalle.edu/vietnamgeneration/vol1/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by La Salle University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vietnam Generation by an authorized editor of La Salle University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The A m erican BoMbARdMENT of K a m puc Nea, 1969-197? B e n K iE R N A N On March 18,1969, the United States Air Force began its secret B-52 bombardment of rural Cambodia'. Exactly one year later, that country's ruler. Prince Norodom Sihanouk, was overthrown and the Vietnam War, com bined with a new civil war, to tear the nation apart for the next five years. The United States bombing of the countryside continued (now publicly) and increased from 1970 to August 1973. when Congress imposed a halt. Nearly half of the US bom bing tonnage was dropped in the last six months. The total was 540,000 tons. Rural Cambodia was destroyed, and 'Democratic Kampuchea' rose in its ashes. The emergent Communist Party of Kampuchea (CPK) regime, led by Pol Pot, had profited greatly from the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • June 21, 1975 Conversation Between Chinese Leader Mao Zedong and Cambodian Leader Pol Pot
    Digital Archive digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org International History Declassified June 21, 1975 Conversation between Chinese leader Mao Zedong and Cambodian Leader Pol Pot Citation: “Conversation between Chinese leader Mao Zedong and Cambodian Leader Pol Pot,” June 21, 1975, History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, CWIHP Working Paper 22, "77 Conversations." http://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/111267 Summary: Mao Zedong muses on the nature of the struggle between the capitalist and socialist forces within China. He tells Pol Pot not to blindly follow the Chinese model, but adopt Marxist theory to the Cambodian realities. Excepts. Original Language: Chinese Contents: English Translation MAO ZEDONG AND POL POT Beijing, 21 June 1975 [Mao Zedong:] During the transition from the democratic revolution to adopting a socialist path, there exist two possibilities: one is socialism, the other is capitalism. Our situation now is like this. Fifty years from now, or one hundred years from now, the struggle between two lines will exist. Even ten thousand years from now, the struggle between two lines will still exist. When Communism is realized, the struggle between two lines will still be there. Otherwise, you are not a Marxist. This is unity existing among opposites. If one only mentions one side of the two, that is metaphysics. I believe in what Marx and Lenin have said, that the path [of advance] would be tortuous. From the era of Lenin to the era of Khrushchev and Brezhnev, the Soviet Union has changed. But in the future it is certain that it will return to Lenin’s path. China is also like this.
    [Show full text]
  • The Life Course of Pol Pot: How His Early Life Influenced the Crimes He Committed
    Scientific THE LIFE COURSE OF POL POT: HOW HIS EARLY LIFE INFLUENCED THE CRIMES HE COMMITTED Myra de Vries1* Maartje Weerdesteijn** ABSTRACT International criminology focuses mostly on the lower level perpetrators even though it finds the leader is crucial for orchestrating the circumstances in which these people kill. While numerous theories from ordinary criminology have been usefully applied to these lower level perpetrators, the applicability of these theories to the leaders has remained underexplored. In order to fill this gap, the life course theory of Sampson and Laub will be applied to Pol Pot whose brutal communist regime cost the lives of approximately 1.7 million people. A unusual childhood, the influence of peers while he studied in Paris, and his marriage to a woman who shared his revolutionary mind-set, were all negative turning-points for Pol Pot. I. Introduction Mass violence is constructed as something extraordinary that violates cosmopolitan, and perhaps even universal, norms.2 The extraordinary nature of these crimes lies in the fact that these are very often a state-directed effort to harm or kill marginalised groups. These crimes are also referred to as “crimes of obedience,”3 since lower level perpetrators often obey high level orders unquestioningly without taking personal responsibility for the ethical repercussions.4 *Myra de Vries graduated her BSc Criminologie at Leiden University in 2012, and is currently a student in the MSc International Crimes and Criminology programme. **Maartje Weerdesteijn is an assistant professor at the department of criminology at VU University Amsterdam and researcher at the Center for International Criminal Justice.
    [Show full text]