Rohith Vemula: Foregrounding Caste Oppression in Indian Higher Education Institutions

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rohith Vemula: Foregrounding Caste Oppression in Indian Higher Education Institutions ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846 Rohith Vemula: Foregrounding Caste Oppression in Indian Higher Education Institutions In April 2021, a professor from the Indian Institute of Technology verbally abused students belonging to Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe communities. The incident brought to the fore conversations around caste and education. One is instantly reminded of how five years before this incident, in 2016, Rohith Vemula, a Dalit PhD scholar at the University of Hyderabad, died by suicide. Between 2016 and 2021 itself, India lost several students belonging to Dalit and Bahujan communities to suicide as a result of caste-based discrimination. That elite Indian higher education institutions practise caste-based discrimination is nothing new. But Vemula’s death sparked a political movement. This reading list attempts to understand how and why this came to be. “Rohith Vemula’s dream,” Anand Teltumbde wrote, “of becoming a science writer like his idol, Carl Sagan, ended abruptly at the altar of caste.” On 17 January 2016, Rohith Vemula, a Dalit research scholar from the University of Hyderabad (UoH), took his own life. Vemula’s death, an EPW editorial noted, came after months of “political and administrative persecution” by the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS)-affiliated Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP), the Bharatiya Janata Party-led union government, and the UoH administration’s “opportunist pandering” of the union government. Two months and 1,000 kilometres away, in Delhi, another Dalit student in yet another elite higher education institution (HEI) died by suicide. Muthukrishnan, a Dalit research scholar from Jawaharlal Nehru University, took his own life on 13 March 2017. On the controversy surrounding Muthukrishnan’s death, P Thirumal and Carmel Christy wrote that elite ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846 institutions in India openly display a “Brahminical form of embodiment” that keeps others from inhibiting the university’s space. Dalit–Bahujans, as relatively new entrants to this body that has been largely composed of savarna aesthetics and taste, are constantly made to feel alienated and discriminated. In May 2019, Payal Tadvi, a second-year medical student pursuing her master’s degree in Mumbai, was driven to suicide after facing repeated caste-based discrimination, harassment and threats from her senior colleagues. In their letter calling for justice for Tadvi’s death, members of the Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA) and Medico Friend Circle (MFC) noted that there is “rampant ingrained casteism” in higher education institutions which must be acknowledged and addressed. Ramdas Rupavath, reflecting on Rohith’s suicide, wrote that, “most Dalit students in universities encounter everyday humiliation by the official administration on the one hand and elite academicians on the other.” Drishadwati Bargi observed that harassment is a “potent tool” for humiliation as it often cannot be proved. Besides, Bargi wrote, the “Hindu” mind’s hostility to reservations makes it reluctant in sharing a common space with Avarnas. For instance, the simplest, everyday practices of communication between the Savarna teachers and the Dalit students in the university space are often characterised with unrecognised power dynamic and prejudice; incidents that cannot be mapped easily. This is not because they are mystical but because their normalised status makes them unquestionable. In light of the violence against marginalised students by an Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Kharagpur professor over a video call in April 2021, P Thirumal made a similar observation, that caste discrimination in elite Indian HEIs has taken a more “prosaic mode” with teachers from privileged castes actively withdrawing from interacting with marginalised students. Undeniably, India’s elite HEIs are systemically casteist in nature. JSA and MFC’s letter also observed that Dalit and Adivasi students are known to drop out of pursuing and completing their higher education due to this systemic casteism. To put this institutional casteism in perspective, it must be remembered that Vemula was not the first UoH student belonging to the Dalit community to die by suicide. As Rupavath noted, since its inception in the 1970s, 12 Dalit students from the UoH have taken ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846 their own lives. It must also be mentioned that the “institutional murders” of the three Dalit students mentioned here occurred within the last five years and in HEIs in Indian cities. That caste is a thing of the past and is experienced only in rural India is simply untrue. As recently as July 2021, when Other Backward Class reservations for the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) was announced, debates followed on social media opposing the same. Vemula’s suicide, and his suicide note, sparked a political movement of resistance. His death exposed the “criminality” that stemmed from the inherently casteist nature of HEIs in India. This reading list revisits the events that led up to Vemula’s suicide, the government’s response to his death, the institutional casteism practised in India’s HEIs, and the impact of Vemula’s death on the future of Indian politics. Rohith Vemula’s Death In February 2016, Anand Teltumbde wrote that Vemula’s death was not just a “stray case of caste prejudice” but the result of a larger pattern of the upsurge of Brahminical and “Hindutva forces” in India. As mentioned before, 12 Dalit students have died by suicide in UoH since 1970, but nine of them took their own lives within the last 10 years. While the saga of crimes against Dalits is an ancient one, the roots of the current episode lie in the false police complaint lodged by the president of ABVP’s Hyderabad Central University (HCU) unit, N Susheel Kumar—who is also the organisation’s state committee member—alleging that 30 Ambedkar Students’ Association (ASA) members had beaten him up. Kumar alleged that the Dalit students had resorted to such violence to demand an apology for his remarks on Facebook, describing ASA members as “goons.” A day after Kumar gave his written apology, “he got himself admitted to a hospital, got photographed and filed a police complaint saying he was assaulted.” While the proctorial board of the UoH did not find evidence of assault, they remained suspicious of Vemula and his friends, D Prashanth, P Vijay Kumar, C Sheshaiah and V Sunkanna, for a whole semester. Then, Bandaru Dattatreya, BJP member of Parliament (MP) from Secunderabad, wrote to the then Union Human Resources Development Minister (HRD), Smriti Irani, alleging that the UoH had become the centre of “casteist, extremist and anti-national” activities of the ASA. Irani then wrote to the university’s vice chancellor, Appa Rao Podile, ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846 asking him to take action against the students, and as a result, on 16 December 2015, Vemula and his four friends were suspended for a semester. An EPW editorial called the administration’s orders “outlandish” and “strange.” Four of the students (as one was a former student) were barred from staying in the hostel till the completion of their course—two of them enrolled in 2013, and the other two enrolled in 2014—which could mean that for at least two to three years they would have to live in expensive rented accommodation outside. The administration also said that these students can be “seen” only in their departments, the library, in academic activities relevant to their respective disciplines, and that they must not “enter” the administrative block and “common places” in groups. As a form of protest, Vemula and his friends slept in a public space near the university’s shopping complex. It was in the midst of this protest that Vemula took the tragic step of dying by suicide. Questioning Rohith Vemula’s Dalit Identity Teltumbde noted that when Vemula died, the police filed a first information report (FIR) under the Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against Podile, Dattatreya, and Kumar for abetting Vemula’s suicide. The Act warrants that the perpetrators are to be arrested immediately, but the police did not make any arrests. Instead, the BJP raked up a controversy around Vemula’s caste so that no such arrests could be made. Smriti Irani’s one-member judicial commission—former Allahabad High Court judge, A K Roopanwal—who probed into the circumstances leading to Vemula’s death, observed that Vemula was not a Dalit. But Guntur district collector, Kantilal Dande, had already confirmed in his report to the National Commission for Scheduled Castes (NCSC) that Vemula was a Dalit. In the case of inter-caste marriages, the caste of the child is decided based on the circumstances of their upbringing. On defining the rights of children born out of inter-caste marriages, the Supreme Court bench held that a child can claim their mother’s caste if they were brought up by the mother as a member of that caste. In Rohith’s case his mother belongs to the Mala community (a Dalit sub-caste), had separated from her husband who is a Vadera (Other Backward ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846 Classes–OBC) and brought up her children in a Dalit colony. The fact that Rohith grew up with Dalit consciousness, lived, suffered and even died as a Dalit, exemplarily confirmed to the circumstances the Court depicted. Teltumbde noted that the ​​fact-finding committee of the Indian People’s Tribunal indicted Podile for ignoring a letter Vemula wrote to him roughly a month before he took his own life. Then, a Joint Action Committee for Social Justice (JAC), formed to fight for justice for Vemula, demanded the dismissal and arrest of Podile. At this point, the vice chancellor fled the scene. But the HRD ministry sent Podile back to the UoH campus, promising to repress any resistance with “brute force.” When news of Podile’s return spread through the campus, protests broke out and the police lathi-charged students and faculty alike, rounding up 24 students and two faculty members and charging them under 11 sections of different laws.
Recommended publications
  • Structural Violence Against Children in South Asia © Unicef Rosa 2018
    STRUCTURAL VIOLENCE AGAINST CHILDREN IN SOUTH ASIA © UNICEF ROSA 2018 Cover Photo: Bangladesh, Jamalpur: Children and other community members watching an anti-child marriage drama performed by members of an Adolescent Club. © UNICEF/South Asia 2016/Bronstein The material in this report has been commissioned by the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) regional office in South Asia. UNICEF accepts no responsibility for errors. The designations in this work do not imply an opinion on the legal status of any country or territory, or of its authorities, or the delimitation of frontiers. Permission to copy, disseminate or otherwise use information from this publication is granted so long as appropriate acknowledgement is given. The suggested citation is: United Nations Children’s Fund, Structural Violence against Children in South Asia, UNICEF, Kathmandu, 2018. STRUCTURAL VIOLENCE AGAINST CHILDREN IN SOUTH ASIA ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS UNICEF would like to acknowledge Parveen from the University of Sheffield, Drs. Taveeshi Gupta with Fiona Samuels Ramya Subrahmanian of Know Violence in for their work in developing this report. The Childhood, and Enakshi Ganguly Thukral report was prepared under the guidance of of HAQ (Centre for Child Rights India). Kendra Gregson with Sheeba Harma of the From UNICEF, staff members representing United Nations Children's Fund Regional the fields of child protection, gender Office in South Asia. and research, provided important inputs informed by specific South Asia country This report benefited from the contribution contexts, programming and current violence of a distinguished reference group: research. In particular, from UNICEF we Susan Bissell of the Global Partnership would like to thank: Ann Rosemary Arnott, to End Violence against Children, Ingrid Roshni Basu, Ramiz Behbudov, Sarah Fitzgerald of United Nations Population Coleman, Shreyasi Jha, Aniruddha Kulkarni, Fund Asia and the Pacific region, Shireen Mary Catherine Maternowska and Eri Jejeebhoy of the Population Council, Ali Mathers Suzuki.
    [Show full text]
  • M.A. /M.Sc. in Criminology & Police Studies Syllabus
    SARDAR PATEL UNIVERSITY OF POLICE, SECURITY AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE JODHPUR, RAJASTHAN, INDIA M.A. /M.Sc. in Criminology & Police Studies SYLLABUS From the Academic Year 2017 - 2018 Onwards 1 SARDAR PATEL UNIVERSITY OF POLICE, SECURITY AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE, JODHPUR, RAJASTHAN, INDIA M.A. /M. Sc. in Criminology and Police Studies From the academic year 2017 - 2018 onwards Scheme, Regulations and Syllabus Title of the course M.A/M.Sc in Criminology and Police Studies Duration of the course Two Years under Semester Pattern. Eligibility Graduate in any discipline with minimum 55% marks. (5% relaxation for SC/ST/PH candidates) Total Credit Points: 105 Structure of the programme This Master’s programme will consist of: a. Compulsory Papers and Elective Papers; I Semester: (22 Credits) 4 Compulsory Papers, 1 Elective Paper & 1 Practical Paper II Semester: (27 Credits) 4 Compulsory Papers, 1 Elective Paper & 2 Practical Papers (1 of them elective), Winter Internship (to be commenced at the ending of I semester and finished at beginning of II Semester) III Semester: (32 Credits) 4 Compulsory Papers, 1 Elective Paper, 1 Practical Paper & Summer Internship (to be commenced at the ending of II semester and finished at beginning of III Semester) Theory Papers: Each theory paper comprises 4 Contact hours / week. 4 Contact Hours = 2 Lectures+ 1 Tutorial+ 1 Seminar 2 • Electives: Electives will be offered only if a minimum of 5 students opt for that paper. • Practical Paper : The Subject called ‘Practical Paper’ may include any of the/some of the following activities such as Institutional field visits(for practical) & debate on particular issues or article writing on particular issues related to the subject / subject related discussion on short-films/ field based case-study etc.
    [Show full text]
  • ANTI RAGGING POLICY (For Prohibition, Prevention & Punishment)
    ANTI RAGGING POLICY (For Prohibition, Prevention & Punishment) SAY ‘NO’ TO RAGGING RAGGING STUDENT BROCHURE Ragging - A Violation of Human Rights Ragging is strictly prohibited on campus & off campus Vidya Jyothi Institute of Technology (AUTONOMOUS) (Accredited by NAAC, Approved by AICTE New Delhi & Permanently Affiliated to JNTUH) Aziznagar Gate, C.B. Post, Hyderabad-500 075) AWARENESS OF RAGGING As per the orders of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, UGC Regulations and the Andhra Pradesh Prohibition of Ragging Act 1997 as adopted by the State Govt. of Telangana. Ragging is considered as a sadistic thrill, and it is a violation of Human Rights. INSTRUCTIONS TO FRESHERS 1. You do not have to submit to ragging in any form. 2. You do not have to compromise with your dignity and self-respect. 3. You can report incidents of ragging to the authorities concerned. 4. You can contact any member of the Anti Ragging Squad / Anti Ragging Committee of the College, or the Principal. 5. The college is obliged to permit the use of communication facilities (Landline and Mobile phones) for seeking help. 6. If you are not satisfied with the enquiry conducted by the College, you can lodge a First Information Report (FIR) with the local Police, and can complain with the civil authorities also. 7. The college is in any case required to file FIR if your parents or you are not satisfied with the action taken against those who 'ragged' you. 8. Your complaint can be oral or written, and would be treated by the authorities in strict confidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Study Among the Victims of Child Sexual Abuse in the City of Chennai
    IMPACT: International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Literature (IMPACT: IJRHAL) ISSN (P): 2347-4564; ISSN (E): 2321-8878 Vol. 7, Issue 5, May 2019, 43-56 © Impact Journals A STUDY AMONG THE VICTIMS OF CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE IN THE CITY OF CHENNAI S. Latha 1 & Lekha Sri. P 2 1Assistant Professor, Department of Criminology, University of Madras, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India 2Research Scholar, Criminology and Criminal Justice Sciences, Department of Criminology, University of Madras, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India Received: 09 Apr 2019 Accepted: 27 Apr 2019 Published: 09 May 2019 ABSTRACT The problem of child abuse is age-old but the dimensions are new. Every day a new way of harassing children takes place in every part of the world. Since it is a continuous problem we can’t leave the same unstudied and un- researched. In the recent past, many incidents of child abuse are being reported in media. This has created a kind of fear among the public. These recent incidences have raised many questions especially on the causes of the child abuse and protection of children. The present study aimed to conduct empirical research on the reported cases of child sexual abuse registered under POCSO Act in the city of Chennai in the year 2018. KEYWORDS: Child Abuse, Child Rape. Sexual Harassment, Victimization INTRODUCTION A child is a person who is going to carry on what you have started. He is going to be where you are sitting and when you are gone, Attend to those things you think are important “ Abraham Lincoln “Children are the treasure of future and assets of the Nation” Mahatma Gandhi Children are the pillars of any country.
    [Show full text]
  • Functions, Roles and Duties of Police in General
    Chapter 1 Functions, Roles and Duties of Police in General Introduction 1. Police are one of the most ubiquitous organisations of the society. The policemen, therefore, happen to be the most visible representatives of the government. In an hour of need, danger, crisis and difficulty, when a citizen does not know, what to do and whom to approach, the police station and a policeman happen to be the most appropriate and approachable unit and person for him. The police are expected to be the most accessible, interactive and dynamic organisation of any society. Their roles, functions and duties in the society are natural to be varied, and multifarious on the one hand; and complicated, knotty and complex on the other. Broadly speaking the twin roles, which the police are expected to play in a society are maintenance of law and maintenance of order. However, the ramifications of these two duties are numerous, which result in making a large inventory of duties, functions, powers, roles and responsibilities of the police organisation. Role, Functions and Duties of the Police in General 2. The role and functions of the police in general are: (a) to uphold and enforce the law impartially, and to protect life, liberty, property, human rights, and dignity of the members of the public; (b) to promote and preserve public order; (c) to protect internal security, to prevent and control terrorist activities, breaches of communal harmony, militant activities and other situations affecting Internal Security; (d) to protect public properties including roads,
    [Show full text]
  • How England Was Prepared for Persecution and Defended from Martyrdom
    University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository Electronic Theses and Dissertations 5-2005 The Marian and Elizabethan persecutions : how England was prepared for persecution and defended from martyrdom. Mitchell Scott University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd Recommended Citation Scott, Mitchell, "The Marian and Elizabethan persecutions : how England was prepared for persecution and defended from martyrdom." (2005). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 1289. https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/1289 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE MARIAN AND ELIZABTHAN PERSECUTIONS: HOW ENGLAND WAS PREPARED FOR PERSECUTION AND DEFENDED FROM MARTYRDOM By Mitchell Scott B.A., Murray State, 2002 A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Louisville in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Masters of Arts Department of History University of Louisville Louisville, Kentucky May 2005 THE MARIAN AND ELIZABETHAN PERSECUTIONS: HOW ENGLAND WAS PREPARED FOR PERSECUTION AND DEFENDED FROM MARTYRDOM By Mitchell Scott B.A., Murray State University, 2002 A Thesis Approved on April 25, 2005 By the following Thesis Thesis Director ii ABSTARCT THE MARIAN AND ELIZABTHAN PERSECUTIONS: HOW ENGLAND WAS PREPARED FOR PERSECUTION AND DEFENDED FROM MARTYRDOM Mitchell Scott April 25, 2005 This thesis is an historical examination of the Marian and Elizabethan persecutions, with special emphasis paid to the martyrologies and the anti-maryrologies of each queen.
    [Show full text]
  • Crime and Bullying
    JYOTI NIVAS COLLEGE AUTONOMOUS Hosur Road, Bengaluru - 560095 Crime and Bullying Sociology Paper VII Assignment 25/02/2020 Submitted To: The Department of Sociology Submitted By: Priya K. 17HN024K III BA HENGS 1 Introduction to Crime A crime is an unlawful act punishable by a state or other authority. The most popular view is that crime is a category created by law; in other words, something is a crime if declared as such by the relevant and applicable law. the notion that acts such as murder, rape and theft are to be prohibited exists worldwide. what precisely is a criminal offence is defined by criminal law of each country. While many have a catalogue of crimes called the criminal code, in some common countries no such comprehensive statute exists. The state has to severely restrict one's liberty for committing a crime. In modern societies, there are procedures to which investigations and trials must adhere. If found guilty, an offender may be sentenced to a form of reparation such as a community sentence or depending on the nature of their offence to undergo imprisonment or, in some jurisdictions, execution. While every crime violates the law, not every violation of the law counts as a crime. breaches of private law (torts and breaches of contract) are not automatically punished by the state, but can be enforced through civil procedure. 2 Concept of Crime Crime is not just a wrong against an individual but is also a wrong committed against the society or a public wrong and includes acts like murder, rape and theft to mention a few.
    [Show full text]
  • Practitioners' Section
    263 PRACTITIONERS’ SECTION RAGGING: A PUBLIC HEALTH PROBLEM IN INDIA RAJESH GARG ABSTRACT Ragging is any disorderly conduct that has the effect of teasing or handling with rudeness any student, which causes or is likely to cause annoyance, harm or to raise fear in a junior so as to adversely affect the psyche of the junior. Ragging is practiced all over the world, with different nomenclature like hazing, fagging; bapteme in French; doop in Dutch; and Mopokaste in Finnish. The first recorded cases of ragging were in the 8th century BC during the Olympics in Greece. Ragging has been frequently associated with a broad spectrum of physical, behavioral, emotional and social problems among the victims. It independently increases suicide risks. Some of the reasons given by students for ragging are they were also ragged by their seniors; sense of superiority; and introduction. Other factors perpetuating ragging are use of alcohol in hostels and lack of implementation of serious anti-ragging measures by college authorities. Various practical steps to control ragging must include strict role of authorities, ban on alcohol within college and hostels, surprise raids in hostels at night, postings (with accommodation) of wardens in hostels, separate hostels for juniors, presence of college “disciplinary committee” and “cultural committee,” strict punishments for those involved in ragging, actions by Medical Council of India (MCI) and University Grants Commission (UGC) against the erring colleges and universities and formulation of anti-ragging laws. Ragging should be declared a public health problem because it involves the physical, mental and social exploitation of not only an individual but also of his/her family and the society as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Stages in Ragging
    1 Three Stages in Ragging A simple explanation to understand the evil practice of ragging and our failure to address it By Harsh Agarwal, 2011 New Delhi In last ten months I have visited over 40 Universities and Colleges in different parts of India to conduct anti-ragging workshops and got to interact with several thousand students and hundreds of faculty members. The experience so far has been enriching and has helped me realize that even after the Supreme Court’s landmark verdict in 2007 myths about ragging are still deep- rooted in the minds of the people across the length and breadth of the country. At the beginning of every workshop, the first question that I ask students and teachers is how many of them think ragging is bad? Within no time almost every hand in the audience goes up. Next question is, is ragging necessary for friendship? There would be complete silence. I have to make the atmosphere light and assure that that I am not doing any investigation and students can express their views freely. Then some hands gradually go up and soon many more get the courage and majority of hands are up. Then I ask third question – how many of you think that mild ragging should be allowed? Since I become little friendly and informal with my audience by now so the answer comes faster and again majority of hands go up condoning mild ragging. I then try to engage students in a slightly humorous conversation and make them think on what is friendship? How did they make friends in school where there was no ragging? Is friendship a natural phenomenon or it needs a catalyst like ragging? Does ragging happen across the world? During my interaction with the students I have to make sure that I keep their interest alive and bypass their conscious mind to make them listen to me and think on this issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Ragging: Prohibition, Prevention and Punishment
    Ragging: Prohibition, Prevention and Punishment The University Grants Commission vide its letter no F.1-16/2007 (CPP-II) dated June 17, 2009 has reiterated the ban on ragging of students in Institutions of Higher Learning. The students are therefore directed to strictly desist from any kind of ragging. Forms of Ragging: Display of noisy, disorderly conduct, teasing, excitement by rough or rude treatment or handling, including rowdy, undisciplined activities which cause or likely to cause annoyance, undue hardship, physical or psychological harm or raise apprehensive fear in a fresher, or asking the students to do any act or perform something which such a student will not do in the ordinary course and which causes him/her shame or embarrassment or danger to his/her life, etc. Punishment for Participation in/or Abetment of Ragging : 1. Cancellation of admission. 2. Suspension from attending classes. 3. Withholding/withdrawing scholarship/fellowship and other benefits. 4. Debarring from appearing in any test/examination or other evaluation process. 5. Withholding results. 6. Debarring from representing the institution in any national or international meet, tournament, youth festival, etc. 7. Suspension/expulsion from the hostel. 8. Rustication from the institution for periods varying from 1 to 4 semesters or equivalent period. 9. Expulsion from the institution and consequent debarring from admission to any other institution. 10 Fine up to Rs. 25,000/- Affidavit by students and parents Each student and his/her parents/ guardian shall have to furnish an affidavit alongwith the application form to the effect that they will not participate in or abet the act of ragging and that, if found guilty, shall be liable for punishment under the penal law of India.
    [Show full text]
  • BROADENING GENDER: WHY MASCULINITIES MATTER – Attitudes, Practices and Gender Basedmatter Violence – in Four Districts in Sri Lanka
    BROADENING GENDER: WHY MASCULINITIES MATTER – Attitudes, practices and gender basedMATTER violence – in four districts in Sri Lanka FACT SHEET - CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCES AND IMPACT ON MEN’S USE OF VIOLENCE There has been little work done on masculinities, both as a field of inquiry and site of advocacy, in Sri Lanka. To address the gap in evidence-based studies of masculinities, CARE Sri Lanka undertook a study on men’s knowledge, practices and attitudes toward gender and gender- based violence (GBV) in Colombo, Hambantota, Nuwara Eliya and Batticoloa districts. The study is part of the UN Multi-country Study on Men and Violence, coordinated by Partners for Prevention, a UNDP, UNFPA, UN Women and UNV regional joint programme for gender- based violence prevention in Asia and the Pacific, which explores gender-based violence and masculinities to inform evidence-based violence prevention interventions. The study reveals a significant relationship between childhood experiences and adult behaviors. In the context of violence against women, the findings suggest that men who have experienced childhood trauma are very likely to perpetrate violence against their partners. The study also suggests the negative impact of experiencing child abuse (both emotional and physical) on men’s physical and mental health. Thus it is important to strengthen existing mechanisms on prevention, protection and response to child abuse. KEY FINDINGS EXTENT AND PATTERNS OF CHILDHOOD TRAUMA IN SRI LANKA One third of men and 3% of Percentage of men who experienced different types of abuse and neglect in women in the study had been childhood sexually abused as children. Ragging is still a critical issue in Sri Lanka, as 4% of men reported that they had ever ragged someone, including sexual ragging.
    [Show full text]
  • ANTI RAGGING POLICY for (Prohibition, Prevention & Punishment)
    ANTI RAGGING POLICY FOR (Prohibition, Prevention & Punishment) STUDENT BROCHURE Ragging ‐ A Violation of Human Rights Ragging is strictly prohibited on campus & off campus PENDEKANTI INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMET (Sponsored by VASAVI ACADEMY OF EDUCATION) Affiliated to Osmania University & Approved by A.I.C.T.E Vasavi College of Engineering Campus, 9‐5‐81, Ibrahimbagh, Hyderabad – 500 031(AP) 040 20030351, 040 23146028 www.pimhyd.ac.in, [email protected] AWARENESS OF RAGGING As per the orders of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, UGC Regulations and the Andhra Pradesh Prohibition of Ragging Act 1997. Ragging is considered as sadistic thrill and it a violation of Human Rights. INSTRUCTIONS to FRESHERS 1. You do not have to submit to ragging in any form 2. You do not have to compromise with your dignity and self‐respect. 3. You can report incidents of ragging to the concerned. 4. You can contact the Anti‐Ragging Squad / Anti Ragging Committee of the College, ore th Principal. 5. The college is obliged to permit the use of communication facilities (Landline and Mobile phones) for seeking help. 6. If you are not satisfied with the enquiry conducted by the College, you can lodge a First Information Report (FIR) with the local Police and complaint with the civil authorities. 7. The college is in any case required to file FIR if your parents or you'" are not satisfied with the action taken against those who 'ragged' you. 8. Your complaint can be oral or written, and would be treated by the authorities in strict confidence. 9.
    [Show full text]