DOCSLIB.ORG

1600 Wilshire Blvd. Los Angeles, CA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1600 Wilshire Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 1600 Wilshire Blvd. Los Angeles, CA OFFERING MEMORANDUM: Property For Sale DISCLAIMER This confidential Offering Memorandum (this “Memorandum”) is being its own independent investigations, projections and conclusions regarding the delivered subject to the terms of the Confidentiality Agreement personally or acquisition of the Property without reliance on this Memorandum or any other electronically signed by you (the “Confidentiality Agreement”) and constitutes Evaluation Material. Although additional Evaluation Material, which may include part of the Evaluation Material (as defined in the Confidentiality Agreement). It engineering, environmental or other reports, may be provided to qualified parties is being given to you for the sole purpose of evaluating the possible acquisition as the marketing progresses, prospective purchasers should seek advice from of 1600 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA (the “Property”), and is not to be their own attorneys, accountants, and engineering and environmental experts. used for any other purpose or made available to any other party without the Owner expressly reserves the right, at its sole discretion, to reject any offer to prior written consent of the “Owner” or Voit Real Estate Services (“Broker”). purchase the Property or to terminate any negotiations with any party at any This Memorandum was prepared by the Broker based on information supplied time with or without written notice. Owner shall have no legal commitment or by the Owner and the Broker. It contains selected information about the obligations to any prospective purchaser unless and until a written purchase Property and the real estate market but does not contain all the information and sale agreement has been fully executed, delivered and approved by necessary to evaluate the acquisition of the Property. The financial projections Owner and any conditions to Owner’s obligations therein have been satisfied contained herein (or in any other “Evaluation Material”, including any computer or waived. diskettes or files distributed to you via email from Broker accessible online Owner has retained Broker as its exclusive broker and will be responsible for any through Broker’s website) are for general reference only. They are based on commission due to Broker in connection with a sale of the Property pursuant to assumptions relating to the general economy and local market, among other a separate agreement. Broker is not authorized to make any representation or factors. Accordingly, actual results may vary materially from such projections. agreement on behalf of Owner. Each prospective purchaser will be responsible Various documents have been summarized herein to facilitate your review; for any claims for commissions by any other broker in connection with a sale these summaries are not intended to be a comprehensive statement of the of the Property if such claims arise from acts of such prospective purchaser or terms or a legal analysis of such documents. its broker. While the information contained in this Memorandum and any other Evaluation This Memorandum is the property of the Owner and Broker and may be Material is believed to be reliable, neither Broker nor Owner guarantees its used only by parties approved by the Owner and Broker. No portion of this accuracy or completeness. Because of the foregoing and since the Property Memorandum may be copied or otherwise reproduced or disclosed to anyone will be sold on an “As-Is, Where-Is” basis, a prospective purchaser must make except as permitted under the Confidentiality Agreement. EXCLUSIVELY OFFERED BY: STAN KWAK COLIN CARTER Vice President Associate 2400 E. Katella Avenue, Suite 750 Lic #01824776 Lic #02012584 Anaheim, CA 92806 714.935.2327 714.935.2303 714.978.7880 • 714.978.9431 Fax [email protected] [email protected] WWW.VOITCO.COM Licensed as Real Estate Salespersons by the CA Bur of Real Estate. ©2017 Voit Real Estate Services, Inc. All Rights Reserved. License # 01991785. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE PROJECT PROPERTY MARKET AREA SUMMARY 4 OVERVIEW 7 DESCRIPTION 12 OVERVIEW17 OVERVIEW 20 DEMOGRAPHICS 23 RENT ROLL 28 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Voit Real Estate Services is pleased to offer for sale the fee simple ownership of an approximately 26,820 sf freestanding low-rise office/retail building. Property is centrally located near Downtown Los Angeles and Koreatown, two of the hottest areas in Los Angeles County. Frontage on Wilshire Boulevard, one of the busiest thoroughfares of Los Angeles, provides excellent street frontage with a total traffic count of more than 18,614 cars daily (Costar 2015). 1600 Wilshire is located just west of Downtown Los Angeles in the Westlake district minutes from Staples Center, L.A. Live and the Los Angeles Convention Center. The Central Los Angeles office market is strong for owners as lease rates continue to rise and vacancy continues to fall. The project also offers immediate access to three major freeways including the Harbor (110), Santa Monica (10) and Hollywood (101) Freeways as well as convenient access to the Westlake/MacArthur Park Metro Station and Los Angeles International Airport. 5 PROPERTY OVERVIEW PROPERTY OVERVIEW • Excellent opportunity for Owner/User to occupy entire second and third floors. • The project has undergone extensive interior renovations including new restrooms on the second and third floors. • Diverse mix of office and retail use. • Desirable on-site parking. • Located directly on Wilshire Boulevard, which provides excellent signage, street identity, vehicle circulation and access to many restaurants and retail. 7 Utility/ Power 720 SF Ste 140 250 SF Suite 130 & 150 Parking 500 SF 6,090 SF Suite 120 RR 410 SF RR Suite 100 Suite 110 1,250 SF 1,200 SF FLOOR PLAN - 1ST FLOOR 8 Suite 210D Suite 210C Suite 210B Suite 210E 140 SF 155 SF 155 SF 300 SF Suite 200B Suite 200A 520 SF 680 SF Ste 210A 100 SF Ste 220 550 SF Suite 205 233 SF Suite 230 800 SF Suite 260 750 SF Roof Deck 3,776 SF Ste 240 720 SF Suite 250 1,216 SF FLOOR PLAN - 2ND FLOOR 9 Suite 310 798 SF Suite 320 757 SF Suite 330 1,093 SF Suite 300 Suite 300 306 SF RR RR 154 SF Suite 340 Suite 350 715 SF 521 SF Suite 300 1,787 SF Suite 300 946 SF Suite 300 1,350 SF Suite 300 1,250 SF FLOOR PLAN - 3RD FLOOR 10 1600 Wilshire Blvd. AERIAL 11 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The project features office/retail consisting of three (3) stories and 20 units with flexible sizes ranging from 410 to 3,240 square feet and a 2:1 parking ratio. Address: 1600 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90017 Total Building Area: Approximately 26,830 SF Parcel Size: Approximately 0.28 Acres for entire project Year Built: 1962 Total Units: 20 units, including office and retail Zoning: C4-2 (Commercial) Parking Ratio: 2:1,000 Assessor Parcel #: 5142-012-024 Unit Size Range: 410 SF to 3,240 SF 13 MARKET OVERVIEW MARKET OVERVIEW LOS ANGELES 1600 Wilshire consists of a three (3) story, elevator serviced office/retail building located in the Central Los Angeles submarket of Westlake. Presently, the property is in good condition with no apparent deferred maintenance relating to improvements or common areas. Built in 1962, the subject consists of an approximately 26,830 SF, 3-story elevator served office building. The first floor offers ±3,610 SF of retail/office space with ±6,090 SF of parking. The second floor offers ±6,319 SF of office space (with a ±3,776 SF roof deck) and the third offers ±9,677 SF. All three floors are easily divisible to multiple tenants. 1600 Wilshire is located in the residential and commercial neighborhood of Westlake in Central Los Angeles. The project is centrally located at the epicenter of Los Angeles, only 1.2 miles from Staples Center/L.A. Live and 2.6 miles from historic Dodger Stadium. Westlake sits on the outskirts of Koreatown to the West and the downtown financial district to the East. With over 120,000 residents in the 2.72-square-mile neighborhood, Westlake boasts the second-highest density of any community in Los Angeles County, after Koreatown. Current office inventory in Central Los Angeles is approximately 14,139,700 SF while the entire Greater LA market has 303,594,000 SF for buildings 25,000 SF or larger. Net absorption for the Greater LA office market remains positive for the 11th straight quarter at 3,534,000 SF for 2016. The average asking leasing rate is $2.65 per sf in Central Los Angeles. Current office construction in Central LA is at 610,400 SF while Greater LA has 5,416,400 SF currently under construction. With 35.8 million square feet, amounting to 18.1% of the total metro inventory, the Downtown submarket is the largest of the twenty-one distinct geographic concentrations that form the Los Angeles office market. Total employment in the Los Angeles metropolitan area increased by 14,100 jobs during the 4th quarter of 2016, while in the dominant office-using industries, employment grew by 7,300. Rental rates in this market have consistently increased for the 12th consecutive quarter with a 6% annual rent growth for the past three years. 15 LOS ANGELES OFFICE OFFICESUBMARKET SUBMARKET SNAPSHOT SNAPSHOT Los Angeles – Located on the southern coast of California, Los # of Buildings 17,631 Vacancy & Availability Rates Angeles County covers 4,084 square miles and includes San LOSPercent ANGELES - ALL SIZES Clemente and Santa Catalina islands. The county is comprised of Market Size (Sq. Ft) 430,872,703 16.0% Located 14.93%on the14.76% southern coast of California, Los Angeles 14.52% 14.50% The city’s expansive metropolitan area is the second-largest 14.59% 14.26% approximately 88 vibrant and diverse cities hosting more than Vacancy Rate 10.61% 15.0% 14.01% County covers 4,084 square miles and includes San 13.85% 13.77% inthe country, with over 18 million people spread over a 244,000 business establishments—the highest concentration in SF Vacant 45,701,995 Clemente14.0% and Santa Catalina islands.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Confronting Sa-I-Gu: Twenty Years After the Los Angeles Riots
    【특집】 Confronting Sa-i-gu: Twenty Years after the Los Angeles Riots Edward Taehan Chang (the Young Oak Kim Center for Korean American Studies) Twenty years ago on April 29, Los Angeles erupted and Koreatown cried as it burned. For six-days, the LAPD was missing in action as rioting, looting, burning, and killing devastated the city. The “not guilty” Rodney King verdict ignited anger and frustration felt by South Los Angeles residents who suffered from years of neglect, despair, hopelessness, injustice, and oppression.1) In the Korean American community, the Los Angeles riot is remembered as Sa-i-gu (April 29 in Korean). Korean Americans suffered disproportionately high economic losses as 2,280 Korean American businesses were looted or burned with $400 million in property damages.2) Without any political clout and power in the city, Koreatown was unprotected and left to burn since it was not a priority for city politicians and 1) Rodney King was found dead in his own swimming pool on June 17, 2012, shortly after publishing his autobiography The Riot Within: My Journey from Rebellion to Redemption Learning How We Can All Get Along, in April 2012. 2) Korea Daily Los Angeles, May 11, 1992. 2 Edward Taehan Chang the LAPD. For the Korean American community, Sa-i-gu is known as its most important historical event, a “turning point,” “watershed event,” or “wake-up call.” Sa-i-gu profoundly altered the Korean American discourse, igniting debates and dialogue in search of new directions.3) The riot served as a catalyst to critically examine what it meant to be Korean American in relation to multicultural politics and race, economics and ideology.
    [Show full text]
  • East Los Angeles Should Not Be Lumped with the Hollywood Hills, Si
    East Los Angeles Should Not Be Lumped with the Hollywood Hills, Si... Subject: East Los Angeles Should Not Be Lumped with the Hollywood Hills, Silver Lake, and Los Feliz! From: Franziska WiƩenstein < Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 10:47:52 -0700 To: Commissioners, CiƟzens RedistricƟng Commission 901 P Street, Suite 154-A Sacramento, CA 95814 Commissioners: When you Commissioners were picked, many of us in Los Angeles (and many in the media) were concerned that none of you lived in the City of Los Angeles. We were told not to worry, that you understood the region and would draw fair maps. We’ve also been told, throughout the process, that the era of odd-shaped, gerrymandered districts, featuring odd pairings of communiƟes, were over. Then, in your iniƟal draŌ maps, you proposed a district lumping together the Hollywood Hills, Los Feliz, Silver Lake, and East Los Angeles! To get there, the district lines cross the Los Angeles River and dart around Downtown Los Angeles, making the district as bizarrely shaped as anything the poliƟcians ever drew. It will be extremely difficult for whomever is in elected in that district to represent those communiƟes. Those communiƟes are as different as can be. We, the undersigned, strongly urge you to draw more sensible maps. East Los Angeles (and Lincoln Heights, etc.) should be together with other eastside communiƟes so that residents there can elect a repeƟƟve of their choosing. The communiƟes of Hollywood Hills, Los Feliz, and Silver Lake are not “eastside.” No porƟon of those communiƟes are east of Downtown or east of the Los Angeles River.
    [Show full text]
  • Btc BETTER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION 201 N
    btc BETTER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION 201 N. Los Angeles St., Ste.13A 14540 SylvanSt., Ste; A . Los Angeles, CA .90012 · VanNuys, CA 91411 (213} 617-9600 {818) 779~8866 Fa,Y. {213) 517-9643 Fax(818) 779-8870 MAILING AFFIDAVIT City PlanQing Commission Deputy Ad\lisory Agency Case No. ______ Tentative Traer No. ______ Parcel Map No.------~ Zoning Administrator· ·Private Street No. ______ Case No. ______ Coastal Permit Area Planning Commission Case No.-----'-- Central, Harbor, SV, ELA, SLA, WLA, NV Case No.---------- Design Review Board Case No. ______ siTEAC l o~'1 ~oR..~ S'-\~~VY\o~€. ~~~-r- t, _\_·_ &-,.~,-<t· certrfy that I am an employee of BTC ~contractor of the Crty of Los Anqeles. Department of City Planning, State of California, and I drd, on the d.\~ day of ;::::)f'«<v.._y>.Q...'( 20H mail, postage prepaid, to the applicant and all parties required by the Municipal Code,·as detailed on the official ownership list, a notice of hearing, a true copy of which is attached. · .X' 500-foot radius --'---,--Abutting the subject site __,....-"'- __ Owners and Occupants ____ Tenant Notice ____ 100-foot coastal notice --cc,.--State Coastal Commission -~)(-'::--'-. Adjacent City (ies) _ ___!0><'~- Applicant and Representative (where indicated) _city_ Newspaper Notice · X" LA Unified School District, LA County Regional Planning Y Caltrans --;:---,--- Council's Own Initiative __Y~-- Metropolitan Transit Authority -~><'2?--- Certified Neighborhood Council (dept of Neighborhood Empowerment) X Council Office and Council District Office _city_ Homeowners Associations >< Other \)~ (:%: \?W:: Ll) Z:)J (:::> 'T &r->.~'E:,"('{ There is a regular daily communication and service by mail between the City of Los Angeles and each of the A~J: ~were mailed.
    [Show full text]
  • Office Deliveries Continue for Central Los Angeles
    Research & Forecast Report CENTRAL LOS ANGELES | OFFICE Accelerating success. Q2 2017 >> Office Deliveries Continue for Central Los Angeles Key Takeaways Market Indicators | Relative to prior period > Delivery momentum continued in the second quarter with Q2 2017 Forecast J.H. Snyder's 1601 N. Vine St. delivering 115,600 square feet Vacancy (SF) to the market. This leaves 152,500 SF of office product Net Absorption under construction and 811,000 SF of expected proposed Construction construction in the Hollywood submarket. Rental Rate > The average rent for Class A buildings in Central Los Ange- les is $3.42 per square foot (PSF) Full Service Gross (FSG), a 0.7% decrease year-over-year. Summary Statistics | Central Los Angeles, Q2 2017 > Vacancy decreased 10 basis points from one quarter ago Class A Class B All Classes recording 18.0%. Vacancy Rate 12.2% 23.1% 18.0% Change from Q1 ‘17 > Leasing activity rose from last quarter's 122,100 SF total to -110 +80 -10 record 273,300 SF. (Basis Points) Net Absorption* 167.5 -53.4 112.2 > Investment activity consisted of Hudson Pacific acquiring Construction Completions* 115.6 0.0 115.6 Hollywood Center Studios for $200,000,000 ($542 PSF). Under Construction* 152.5 60.5 213.0 *SF, Thousands Central Los Angeles Office Market Asking Rents | Central Los Angeles, Q2 2017 The Central Los Angeles market saw moderate demand activ- ity during second quarter with vacancy decreasing by 10 basis Class A Class B All Classes points from last quarter, and absorption closing at 112,200 SF Average Asking Rent $3.42 $2.48 $2.75 Change from Q1 ‘17 for the quarter.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining the Completeness of Six Los Angeles Cities
    EXAMINING THE COMPLETENESS OF SIX LOS ANGELES CITIES A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate School of Architecture, Planning, and Preservation COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in Urban Planning by Judy Chang May 2012 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project would not have been possible without the support of many people. However, for his guidance and tolerance, special thanks go to Dr. Robert Beauregard. And for their relentless encouragement and comaraderie, my deepest gratitude goes to Caroline Bauer, Caitlin Hackett, Doneliza Joaquin, Caroline Massa, Charles-Antoine Perrault, Frederick Sham, Michael Snidal, and Kerensa Wood. 3 4 5 ABSTRACT While Los Angeles provides an array of goods, services, and amenities across its expansive borders in a quintessentially polycentric manner, there continues to appear to be a lack of some of these “urban functions” in some of the densest parts of the city. This thesis serves to identify this mismatch, comparing a set of six southeast Los Angeles municipalities— whose population densities rival and sometimes exceed some of the nation’s largest cities’— and a portion of Central Los Angeles of roughly the same area and density. While this study reveals that only in some cases do the southeast Los Angeles cities lack urban functions relative to the central city, they generally fall under “high-order” categories such as health care facilities and cultural centers. The study concludes with recommendations for increasing these high- order functions, which would at once grant cities a sense of identity and relieve cost- and time-burdens on residents who must continue traveling to a city center for high-order urban functions.
    [Show full text]
  • Capturing the Cultural Layers of Koreatown, Los Angeles
    CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE CONTESTED SPACES: CAPTURING THE CULTURAL LAYERS OF KOREATOWN, LOS ANGELES A graduate project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts in Mass Communication By Charles Kaijo December 2014 The graduate project of Charles Kaijo is approved: _____________________________________ _________________ Eunai Shrake Date _____________________________________ _________________ Taehyun Kim Date _____________________________________ _________________ David Blumenkrantz, Chair Date California State University, Northridge ii Table of Contents Signature Page…………………………………………………………………….……....ii Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………...iv Chapter 1: Introduction………………………………………………………….…….…..1 Chapter 2: Literature Review…………………………….………………...…….…….….2 Koreatown as a historic ethnic enclave…………….…….……...........……….…..2 The Immigration Act of 1965….……………….……………………...………….4 Koreatown as a multicultural community…………………….………...…………7 The riots……………………………………………………….………………......9 Koreatown as a transnational and regional center……………….……................11 Chapter 3: Photographic Representation…………………………….………….……….17 Chapter 4: Methods…………………………………………………….…………….…..33 Chapter 5: Photo Gallery...………………………………………………………………37 Ethnic enclave…………………………………………………………..……......37 Multicultural space………………………………………….………………...….40 Transnational and regional space………………………………………..……….42 Chapter 6: Final Remark……………………………………….…………...……………47 References……………………………………………………………….…………….…48 iii ABSTRACT
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents Table of Contents
    USC Verdugo Hills Hospital 2013 Community Health Needs Assessment Table of Contents Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................. i I. Authors and Acknowledgements .............................................................................................. 6 Authors ................................................................................................................................................... 6 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................ 6 II. Summary of Key Findings (Executive Summary)....................................................................... 7 III. Introduction and Background ................................................................................................... 9 USC Verdugo Hills Hospital ..................................................................................................................... 9 Glendale Hospital Collaborative ............................................................................................................. 9 Glendale Adventist Medical Center (GAMC) ................................................................................. 10 Glendale Memorial Hospital and Health Center (GMHHC) ........................................................... 10 USC Verdugo Hills Hospital ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Local Foods, Local Places: Actions and Strategies for Los Angeles
    Technical Assistance Program An Action Plan for Improving Food Access in the LA Promise Zone Los Angeles, CA November 30, 2015 Local Foods, Local Places Action Plan – Youth Policy Institute, Los Angeles, CA Community Story On the 50th anniversary of President Lyndon B. Johnson’s initiation of the war on poverty, the Obama Administration awarded the city of Los Angeles and its lead partner, the Youth Policy Institute (YPI), a federal Promise Zone designation from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The Promise Zone program is a federal anti-poverty initiative with the goal of significantly reducing poverty through job creation, increased economic activity, improved educational opportunities, improved public safety, leveraged private capital, preserving and expanding housing affordability, and through smart growth policies. The Los Angeles Promise Zone (see Figure 1) covers diverse, dense communities in central Los Angeles. As part of a set of larger Promise Zone strategies aimed at revitalizing the distressed neighborhoods, a key goal of the LA Promise Zone is to improve residents' health. An important means of achieving this goal is by increasing access to healthy, fresh Example of local vendor informally selling fresh fruits and vegetables. produce in neighborhood. Image credit: Renaissance Planning The Los Angeles Promise Zone is located in LA County Service Planning Area (SPA) 4, and covers the central Los Angeles neighborhoods of Hollywood, East Hollywood, Koreatown, Pico-Union, and Westlake. Lack of access to healthy food in the zone is a major health issue. Eighty-five percent of adults in this Zone report having eaten less than the recommended five daily servings of fruits and vegetables in the past day.
    [Show full text]
  • Rents Register Slight Drop in Central Los Angeles
    Research & Forecast Report CENTRAL LOS ANGELES | OFFICE Accelerating success. Q3 2017 >> Rents Register Slight Drop in Central Los Angeles Key Takeaways Market Indicators | Relative to prior period > Delivery momentum continued in the third quarter as Hud- Q3 2017 Forecast son Pacific delivered the 92,000 square foot (SF) CUE build- Vacancy ing at 5800 Sunset Blvd. to the market. This leaves 60,500 Net Absorption SF of office product under construction and 811,000 SF of Construction expected proposed construction in the Hollywood submarket. Rental Rate > The average rent for Class A buildings in Central Los Ange- les is $3.38 per square foot (PSF) full service gross (FSG), a 2.9% decrease year-over-year. Summary Statistics | Central Los Angeles, Q3 2017 > Vacancy increased 50 basis points from one quarter ago Class A Class B All Classes recording 18.5%. Vacancy Rate 13.9% 22.9% 18.5% Change from Q2 ‘17 > Leasing activity slid from last quarter's 273,300 SF total to +170 -20 +50 record 151,500 SF. (Basis Points) Net Absorption* -29.3 11.6 -11.4 > Investment activity consisted of Klaff Realty LP acquiring Construction Completions* 92.0 0.0 92.0 1360-1370 N. St. Andrews Pl. for $20.7 million ($321 PSF). Under Construction* 0.0 60.5 60.5 *SF, Thousands Central Los Angeles Office Market Asking Rents | Central Los Angeles, Q3 2017 The Central Los Angeles market saw demand taper during the third quarter with vacancy increasing by 50 basis points Class A Class B All Classes from last quarter and absorption closing at -11,400 SF for the Average Asking Rent $3.38 $2.42 $2.74 Change from Q2 ‘17 quarter.
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Measure M
    metro.net/theplan THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENT PLAN centRAl los Angeles The Metro Board of Directors voted to place a sales tax measure, titled the AdditionAl AnnuAl locAl RetuRn Funding PRojections FoR FiRst Full yeAR Los Angeles County Traffic Improvement Plan, on the November 8, 2016, funding is projected to increase each year ballot. This summarizes the projects and Measure M funding for the Central (For street improvements, pothole repair, signals, etc.) Los Angeles area if the measure passes. city Major Projects (in 2015 $) Los Angeles2 $ 56,216,200 • West Santa Ana Transit Corridor LRT $1.4 billion ($3.9 billion total cost)1 Unincorporated LA County2 $ 14,943,600 • LA River Waterway and System Bikepath $365 million 2 Funding may be used for local transportation projects 1 and programs anywhere within the City of Los Angeles • Vermont Transit Corridor $25 million ($425 million total cost) or Unincorporated LA County as they determine. • Crenshaw Northern Extension $1.7 billion ($2.2 billion total cost)1 • Historic Downtown Streetcar $200 million AdditionAl AnnuAl Funding FoR locAl tRAnsit oPeratoRs FoR FiRst Full yeAR Multi-Year Subregional Programs (in 2015 $) funding is projected to increase each year • Active Transportation, First/Last Mile and Mobility Hubs $215 million operator • Subregional Equity Program $235 million LADOT Local3 $ 3,146,100 • Los Angeles Safe Routes to School Initiative $250 million LADOT Commuter Express3 $ 1,795,700 • Bus Rapid Transit and First/Last Mile Solutions e.g. DASH $250 million 3 Funding may be used to operate LADOT transit service as • Freeway Interchange and Operational Improvements $195 million they determine.
    [Show full text]
  • A Report on the First Phase of Air Quality Assessment in South Central Los
    A REPORT ON THE FIRST PHASE SCLA OF AIR QUALITY ASSESSMENT IN SOUTH CENTRAL LOS ANGELES, 2019-2020 SEPTEMBER 30, 2020 Historic South Central Harvard Park Watts The SCLA-PUSH team would like to acknowledge the commitment and hard work provided by our project partners and allies who contributed to the production of this report, including: Primary Authors Paula Torrado Plazas, Air & Toxics Policy Analyst, Project Manager, SCLA-PUSH Monika Shankar, Senior Project Manager, PSR-LA Academic Researchers and Contributors Jill Johnston, Assistant Professor of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California Bhavna Shamasunder, Associate Professor and Chair, Urban and Environmental Policy; Co-Chair, Public Health, Occidental College Peter Sinsheimer, Executive Director, Sustainable Technology & Policy Program, University of California, Los Angeles Editor Julie Lindow Physicians for Social Responsibility-Los Angeles Staff Paula Torrado Plazas, Air & Toxics Policy Analyst, Project Manager, SCLA-PUSH Martha Dina Argüello, Executive Director Jazmine Johnson, Land Use & Health Program Associate SCLA-PUSH Team Laura Muraida, Strategic Concepts in Organizing and Policy Education (SCOPE) Gloria Medina, Strategic Concepts in Organizing and Policy Education (SCOPE) Gina Charusombat, Strategic Concepts in Organizing and Policy Education (SCOPE) Sonya Vasquez, Community Health Councils Jill Johnston, University of Southern California Amanda Jimenez, University of Southern California Wendy Gutschow, University of Southern California Bhavna Shamasunder, Occidental College Jade Henderson, Occidental College Peter Sinsheimer, University of California, Los Angeles Omar Ureta, theWorksLA Graphic Design Omar Ureta, theWorksLA, SCLA-PUSH Anna Artemis Mkhikian We would also like to thank the California Air Resources Board, the California Climate Investments Program, and the Community Air Protection Program team for funding this work and supporting the SCLA-PUSH partnership in our efforts to improve air quality and community health in South Central Los Angeles.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Angeles County Law Enforcement Phone Numbers
    LOS ANGELES COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT PHONE NUMBERS LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF’S - STATIONS Altadena (07) ................................................ 780 E. Altadena Dr., Altadena 91001 .................................. 626-798-1131 Avalon (18) .................................................... 215 Summer Ave., P.O. Box 1551, Avalon 90704 .......... 310-510-0174 Carson (16) ..................................................... 21356 S. Avalon Blvd., Carson 90745 .................................. 310-830-1123 Century (21) .................................................. 11703 Alameda, Lynwood 90262 ........................................... 323-567-8121 Compton ........................................................... 301 S. Willowbrook Avenue, Compton 90220 ............................................................ Crescenta Valley (07) ................................. 4554 N. Briggs Ave., La Crescenta 91214 ............................. 818-248-3464 East Los Angeles (02) ................................. 5019 E. Third St., Los Angeles 90022 .................................... 323-264-4151 Industry (14) .................................................. 150 N. Hudson Ave., City of Industry ............................................ 626-330-3322 Lakewood (13)............................................... 5130 N. Clark Ave., Lakewood 90712 ................................... 562-866-9061 Lancaster (11) ............................................... 501W. Lancaster Blvd., Lancaster 93534.............................. 661-948-8466
    [Show full text]