Ordinary Council Meeting Minutes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ordinary Council Meeting Minutes Ordinary Council Meeting Minutes Meeting No. 392 Tuesday 8 September 2015 Commenced at 7pm Keilor Municipal Offices Old Calder Highway Keilor TRIM Reference: DA/15/30 Welcome to this Council Meeting The purpose of this meeting is for Council to make decisions on matters that affect the City. Matters Council will consider at this meeting are listed in this Agenda. The Governance (Meeting Procedure) Local Law No. 1 2015, sets out the way Council Meetings run and the conduct expected of the Council and members of the public. Council Meetings are open to members of the public to attend and observe proceedings. Members of the public must ensure their conduct or behaviour does not interfere with the running of the Council Meeting. Members of the public (including media) wishing to record a Council Meeting (audio or video) must seek approval from the Chair prior to the meeting. Only if the Chair grants permission is recording allowed, and the Chair will advise everyone in attendance (for privacy reasons). The Council A Panel of Administrators appointed by the State Government form the Council and have the authority to make decisions in the best interests of the City of Brimbank. The Chair of the Panel of Administrators performs the functions, powers and duties of the Mayor of Brimbank City Council. Panel of Administrators: • Chair, Mr John Watson • Administrator, Mrs Jane Nathan • Administrator, Mr John Tanner The Chair is responsible for ensuring Council Meetings are run in accordance with the Governance (Meeting Procedure) Local Law No. 1 2015. Voting For each decision Council makes, a Councillor will first propose (move) a motion. The motion must be seconded by another Councillor before it can be discussed and decided on. Voting on a motion is always by a show of hands. Council Meetings will generally follow the order below: Opening (including Acknowledgement of Country) At the start of each meeting, the Chair will welcome everyone in attendance, pay Council’s respects to the traditional owners of the land, and restate Council’s Commitment to act in the best interests of the Brimbank community, make decisions fairly and without bias and uphold all obligations under State and Local laws. Apologies / Leave of Absence It is expected that Councillors will attend all Council and Special Committee meetings to participate in the Council decision making process. There may be times a Councillor is not able to attend a meeting, and may submit an apology for that meeting by advising the Mayor or Chair. When a Councillor is absent for a longer period of time, they will request a Leave of Absence, which must be approved by Council. The Chair will note any Leaves of Absence at subsequent Council Meetings. Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest Councillors are required to disclose any conflict of interest as well as the reasons for that conflict. If a Councillor has disclosed a conflict of interest, they must leave the meeting prior to any discussion or vote on the matter, and will only return to the Council Meeting when the matter has been decided. In practical terms, Councillors are asked to flag their intent to disclose a conflict of interest at the start of the meeting when asked by the Chair. They will also restate any conflict of interest, including the type and nature, immediately prior to the relevant item on the Agenda. Designation of Items as Confidential In order for Council to make an informed decision on a matter, sometimes supporting written information is provided that is inappropriate to be released publicly, for example, information that is Commercial In Confidence. Council may resolve to declare any relevant documents as confidential, in accordance with Section 89(2) of the Local Government Act 1989. Confirmation of Minutes of Previous Meetings Council is required to confirm the accuracy of the Minutes of previous Council Meetings. Condolences / Congratulations The Chair may convey any civic condolences, highlight any achievements or extend congratulations on behalf of Council. Public Question Time For each Ordinary Council Meeting, there is an opportunity for the members of the public to submit questions to the Council. There is a limit of two (2) questions per person, per meeting. Questions must be submitted in writing by 12 noon on the day of the meeting, and must be related to the responsibilities of Council and worded respectfully. Members of the public who have submitted questions must be present at Public Question Time, for their question to be read and responded to. A Council officer will read questions submitted in accordance with the Governance (Meeting Procedure) Local Law No. 1 2015, and the Chair will decide who responds. There will be times when a question cannot be answered at the meeting. In these situations, the question will be ‘taken on notice’ and a written response will be provided within five (5) business days. Petitions Petitioning is a long-established process for members of the community to make a request or present their views on a matter directly to Council. Petitions must be received five (5) business days prior to the Council Meeting so the matter can be included in the Agenda. Any petitions handed to Councillors or Council staff at a Council Meeting will be presented to the next Ordinary Council Meeting. Minutes/Reports of Special Committees If Council has established special committees under section 86 of the Local Government Act 1989, these committees must report on their activities to Council. The usual practice for these reports is for the Minutes of the Special Committee Meeting to be presented. Officer Reports The reports in this Agenda are written by Council officers based on their best professional advice. Reports contain background, analysis of issues, relevant legal and financial implications and an officer recommendation on the matter for Council to consider. Notices of Motion A Notice of Motion is a motion that a Councillor wants to put to the Council for their consideration on a particular matter. These motions appear in the Agenda without an Officer Report. Rescission Motions A Rescission Motion is a motion that a Councillor wants to put to the Council to consider reversing a previous Council decision on a matter. Usually a Councillor will propose a different motion for Council to consider. There may be times where a Council officer will recommend to Council that it rescinds a previous decision. This will be included in an Officer Report. Urgent Business If a matter has arisen since the distribution of the Agenda that requires a decision of Council, and cannot be deferred until the next Ordinary Council Meeting, it may be admitted as an item of urgent business. This may only happen if deferring consideration of the matter would have a negative impact on the Council, the municipality or the local community. Council must first decide to accept an item of urgent business before the matter itself can be discussed or considered. Confidential Business Sometimes Council will need to close the meeting to members of the public, to consider confidential Officer Reports. The decision to close the meeting to the members of the public may only be made in accordance with section 89 of the Local Government Act 1989. Members of the public are then required to leave the meeting, but are able to return once the confidential item has been decided. Closing The Chair will thank everyone for attending and formally close the Council Meeting. Next meeting Tuesday 22 September 2015, at 7pm. Council Chamber, Municipal Offices, 6-18 Alexandra Avenue, Sunshine Council Mr John Watson Chair of Panel of Administrators Mrs Jane Nathan Administrator Mr John Tanner Administrator Executive Management Team Mr Bill Jaboor Chief Executive Officer Mr Stuart Menzies Director City Development Ms Helen Morrissey Director Corporate and Community Relations Mr Neil Whiteside Director Community Wellbeing Mr Paul Younis Director Infrastructure and Environment Governance Team Ms Melanie Fleer Governance Manager Council Business Officer Table of Contents 1. Opening (including Acknowledgement of Country) 13191 2. Council Commitment 13191 3. Apologies/Leave of Absence 13191 4. Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest 13191 5. Designation of Items as Confidential 13191 6. Confirmation of Minutes of Previous Meetings 13192 7. Condolences 13192 8. Congratulations 13192 9. Public Question Time 13192 10. Petitions 13193 11. Minutes/Reports of Special Committees 13193 12. Officer Reports Report 12.1 - Brimbank Planning Scheme Amendment C130 – 129–131 Durham Road, Sunshine 13194 Report 12.2 – Delegates’ and Representatives’ Reports 13197 Report 12.3 – Financial Statements 2014-2015 and Performance Statement 2014-2015 13200 Report 12.4 – Governance and Management Checklist 2014-2015 13206 Report 12.5 - Assemblies of Council Report 13208 Report 12.6 - Proposed Sale of Land at 5 McCoubrie Avenue, Sunshine West 13211 Report 12.7 - Proposed Sale of Land at 541, 545 and 547 Melton Highway, Sydenham 13217 Report 12.8 – Final Draft Ardeer Green Activity Hub Master Plan: Cycle Sports Facilities 2015 13221 Report 12.9 – Objection to Planning Permit Application PA2015/4807 - Boral Deer Park Quarry, Riding Boundary Road, Deer Park (City of Melton) 13224 Report 12.10 – Brimbank Social Justice Coalition Update – September 2015 13227 Report 12.11 - Tender Report for Contract No. 16/2056 - Churchill Reserve, St Albans, Soccer Pitch 3 – Sports Ground Reconstruction 13230 Report 12.12 – Tender Report for Contract No. 16/2025 – Adams Street and Disraeli Street, St Albans, Road Rehabilitation 13232 13. Notices of Motion 13234 14. Rescission Motions 13234 15. Urgent Business 13234 16. Confidential Business 13234 Brimbank City Council Ordinary Council Meeting Minutes 13191 Order of Business Chair, Mr John Watson, opened the meeting at 7pm. 1. Opening (including Acknowledgement of Country) Chair, Mr John Watson, on behalf of the Brimbank City Council, acknowledged the traditional custodians of this land, the Wurundjeri people, and paid respects to elders past and present.
Recommended publications
  • Survey of Post-War Built Heritage in Victoria: Stage One
    Survey of Post-War Built Heritage in Victoria: Stage One Volume 1: Contextual Overview, Methodology, Lists & Appendices Prepared for Heritage Victoria October 2008 This report has been undertaken in accordance with the principles of the Burra Charter adopted by ICOMOS Australia This document has been completed by David Wixted, Suzanne Zahra and Simon Reeves © heritage ALLIANCE 2008 Contents 1.0 Introduction................................................................................................................................. 5 1.1 Context ......................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Project Brief .................................................................................................................................. 5 1.3 Acknowledgements....................................................................................................................... 6 2.0 Contextual Overview .................................................................................................................. 7 3.0 Places of Potential State Significance .................................................................................... 35 3.1 Identification Methodology .......................................................................................................... 35 3.2 Verification of Places .................................................................................................................. 36 3.3 Application
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Junction Estate and Matthew's Hill Precinct
    GRAND JUNCTION ESTATE & MATTHEW’S HILL PRECINCT GRAND JUNCTION ESTATE AND MATTHEW’S HILL PRECINCT 1 CONTEXT PTY LTD Locality History Two important factors influenced the development of Sunshine from a rural area in the mid-1800s to the industrial centre it had become by the 1950s. The first was the railway boom of the 1880s, when it became one of the main junctions in Victoria. The second was the establishment of the Sunshine Harvester Works in 1906-1907 by Hugh Victor McKay, giving the township its current name. In the 1880s Melbourne was booming, being one of the fastest growing cities in the world. The boom had a major impact on the development of the Brimbank area. The metropolis was expanding westward as new suburbs were developed along the newly established railway lines. As well as residential development, new and relocated factories flourished in the Brimbank area (Ford & Vines 2000:56). The wealth of connecting railway lines in Brimbank was a key factor in encouraging industries to settle in the area. Braybrook Junction Station opened in 1885 and St. Albans Station in 1887. Railway sidings went off from the main lines to quarries and new factories. The locality of Braybrook Junction, as Sunshine was first known, was described as ‘the greatest junction in Victoria’. New industries relating to the railway as well as agricultural implements thrived at Braybrook Junction. The Braybrook Implement Company started one of the first factories there, producing mainly farm implements. The factory, established on Devonshire Road next to the new railway junction was later taken over by H.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Potentially Contaminated Land in Victoria – Challenges for Local Government
    Potentially contaminated land in Victoria – challenges for local government Mark Beaufoy* In making planning decisions about potentially contaminated land (PCL) councils must decide whether the land is suitable for the proposed use and development. Planning policy encouraging urban consolidation and increas- ing property values are leading to the transformation of former industrial land to residential and other sensitive uses. However, the potential restrictions on land-use and the costs of investigating, remediating and redeveloping contaminated land can be significant. In making planning decisions about PCL, councils often face significant pressure to be commercial and practical, and to balance other planning objectives in performing legal obligations associated with PCL. At the same time, as a number of cases before the courts have demonstrated, councils can also face significant legal liability (and expensive and time-consuming litigation) if statutory obligations relating to PCL are not properly performed. The regulatory framework for PCL in Victoria is mature, having developed over the past 20 years following amendments to the Planning and Environment Act 1987 (Vic) and the introduction of Ministerial Direction No 1 – Potentially Contaminated Land on 9 October 1989. However, further work is required to improve some aspects of the regulatory framework, give clearer guidance to councils in making decisions about PCL and avoid the uncertainty created by some recent decisions reviewed by the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal. INTRODUCTION Much of the recent focus of Melbourne 2030: Planning for Sustainable Growth and Melbourne @ 5 Million has been on Melbourne’s growth areas, review of the urban growth boundary, the precinct structure plan process and improving transport infrastructure.1 An important part of this policy is also consolidating development and employment around Central Activity Districts (Box Hill, Broadmeadows, Dandenong, Footscray, Frankston and Ringwood), Activity Centres and more intensive development along major transport routes.
    [Show full text]
  • Maribyrnong Planning Scheme Municipal Strategic Statement
    MARIBYRNONG PLANNING SCHEME 21.01 MUNICIPAL PROFILE 16/11/2006 C31 21.01-1 Introduction 19/01/2006 VC37 How will the City of Maribyrnong look and feel and function in 15 or 20 year’s time? The trends which are operating now, and the opportunities for redevelopment and change which exist here, show quite clearly that there will be major physical changes within the city in the foreseeable future. Major and rapid change, amounting to the complete re-creation of some areas, will occur in a horse-shoe shaped area within a kilometre or so of the city’s eastern, northern and western boundaries. On the other hand, in most of the central areas of the city, change, if it occurs at all, will be slow and subtle; consolidating and enhancing existing character rather than re-creation. These physical changes will bring about significant cultural, social, economic and environmental changes. The Council is committed to bringing about these changes. The primary issue is to influence change to achieve the outcomes which are carefully considered, fair and just to all, which will enhance the environment and economic and social opportunities, and bring to life Council’s mission of building a diverse yet cohesive inner city community where everyone can contribute to the life of the city. Achieving the best outcomes from change requires a description of what is wanted. The process of change needs to be carefully managed to increase future opportunities for, choice in, and access to, housing, employment, leisure, recreation, entertainment, shopping, and education. These are the foundations of our quality of life.
    [Show full text]
  • Brimbank City Council Enterprise Agreement 8, Ea8 2018
    [2019] FWCA 1793 DECISION Fair Work Act 2009 s.185—Enterprise agreement Brimbank City Council (AG2018/6115) BRIMBANK CITY COUNCIL ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 8, EA8 2018 Local government administration COMMISSIONER CIRKOVIC MELBOURNE, 25 MARCH 2019 Application for approval of the Brimbank City Council Enterprise Agreement 8, EA8 2018. [1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Brimbank City Council Enterprise Agreement 8, EA8 2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Brimbank City Council. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement. [2] The Employer has provided two sets of written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. [3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. [4] The Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union; the Association of Professional Engineers, Scientists and Managers, Australia; and the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they each want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisations. 1 [2019] FWCA 1793 [5] The Agreement was approved on 25 March 2019 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 1 April 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Post-War Built Heritage in Victoria
    SURVEY OF POST-WAR BUILT HERITAGE IN VICTORIA STAGE TWO: Assessment of Community & Administrative Facilities Funeral Parlours, Kindergartens, Exhibition Building, Masonic Centre, Municipal Libraries and Council Offices prepared for HERITAGE VICTORIA 31 May 2010 P O B o x 8 0 1 9 C r o y d o n 3 1 3 6 w w w . b u i l t h e r i t a g e . c o m . a u p h o n e 9 0 1 8 9 3 1 1 group CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Background 7 1.2 Project Methodology 8 1.3 Study Team 10 1.4 Acknowledgements 10 2.0 HISTORICAL & ARCHITECTURAL CONTEXTS 2.1 Funeral Parlours 11 2.2 Kindergartens 15 2.3 Municipal Libraries 19 2.4 Council Offices 22 3.0 INDIVIDUAL CITATIONS 001 Cemetery & Burial Sites 008 Morgue/Mortuary 27 002 Community Facilities 010 Childcare Facility 35 015 Exhibition Building 55 021 Masonic Hall 59 026 Library 63 769 Hall – Club/Social 83 008 Administration 164 Council Chambers 85 APPENDIX Biographical Data on Architects & Firms 131 S U R V E Y O F P O S T - W A R B U I L T H E R I T A G E I N V I C T O R I A : S T A G E T W O 3 4 S U R V E Y O F P O S T - W A R B U I L T H E R I T A G E I N V I C T O R I A : S T A G E T W O group EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this survey was to consider 27 places previously identified in the Survey of Post-War Built Heritage in Victoria, completed by Heritage Alliance in 2008, and to undertake further research, fieldwork and assessment to establish which of these places were worthy of inclusion on the Victorian Heritage Register.
    [Show full text]
  • SCG Victorian Councils Post Amalgamation
    Analysis of Victorian Councils Post Amalgamation September 2019 spence-consulting.com Spence Consulting 2 Analysis of Victorian Councils Post Amalgamation Analysis by Gavin Mahoney, September 2019 It’s been over 20 years since the historic Victorian Council amalgamations that saw the sacking of 1600 elected Councillors, the elimination of 210 Councils and the creation of 78 new Councils through an amalgamation process with each new entity being governed by State appointed Commissioners. The Borough of Queenscliffe went through the process unchanged and the Rural City of Benalla and the Shire of Mansfield after initially being amalgamated into the Shire of Delatite came into existence in 2002. A new City of Sunbury was proposed to be created from part of the City of Hume after the 2016 Council elections, but this was abandoned by the Victorian Government in October 2015. The amalgamation process and in particular the sacking of a democratically elected Council was referred to by some as revolutionary whilst regarded as a massacre by others. On the sacking of the Melbourne City Council, Cr Tim Costello, Mayor of St Kilda in 1993 said “ I personally think it’s a drastic and savage thing to sack a democratically elected Council. Before any such move is undertaken, there should be questions asked of what the real point of sacking them is”. Whilst Cr Liana Thompson Mayor of Port Melbourne at the time logically observed that “As an immutable principle, local government should be democratic like other forms of government and, therefore the State Government should not be able to dismiss any local Council without a ratepayers’ referendum.
    [Show full text]
  • 28 OCTOBER, 1964.] Oakleigh Court-House
    Stat,e Superannuation Fund. [28 OCTOBER, 1964.] Oakleigh Court-house. 1117 Mr. RYLAH (Chief Secretary).­ 4. What was the total amount of interest ! listened with interest to the honor­ credited to this account as at 30th June, able member for Williamstown. I 1964? 5. What value of reserve units was trans­ sympathize with him in the problem ferred to ordinary units to 30th June, 1964? which he raised; in fact, I was pleased to hear his declaration of Mr. BOLTE (Premier and Trea­ policy. So far as the Minister of surer) .-The answers are- Housing is concerned, whenever I 1. 916 officers. Details of the salary have raised with him a problem re­ ranges of the officers concerned are not required for reserve unit purposes and are lating to a deserted wife who wished therefore not kept by the Superannuation to keep the young children and home Board. together, the honorable gentleman 2. £9,868 12s. 7d. and the Housing Commission were 3. and 4. No interest has yet been most co-operative. I shall bring the credited. The Superannuation Board, acting honorable member's remarks to the on the advice of the actuary, has deter­ Minister of Housing and, if I can mined that the rate shall be 4 per cent. per assist him in any case he puts for­ annum compounded, and the first interest will be credited on 30th June, 1965, on the ward, I shall be glad to do so. amount of credit of the Reserve Units Mr. BLOOMFIELD (Minister of Account on 30th June, 1964.
    [Show full text]
  • Government Emblems, Embodied Discourse and Ideology: an Artefact-Led History of Governance in Victoria, Australia
    Government Emblems, Embodied Discourse and Ideology: An Artefact-led History of Governance in Victoria, Australia Katherine Hepworth Doctor of Philosophy 2012 ii iii Abstract Government emblems are a rich source of historical information. This thesis examines the evidence of past governance discourses embodied in government emblems. Embodied discourses are found within an archive of 282 emblems used by local governments in Victoria, Australia in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. They form the basis of a history of governance in the State of Victoria from first British exploration in 1803 to the present day. This history of governance was written to test the main contribution of this thesis: a new graphic design history method called discursive method. This new method facilitates collecting an archive of artefacts, identifying discourses embodied within those artefacts, and forming a historical narrative of broader societal discourses and ideologies surrounding their use. A strength of discursive method, relative to other design history methods, is that it allows the historian to seriously investigate how artefacts relate to the power networks in which they are enmeshed. Discursive method can theoretically be applied to any artefacts, although government emblems were chosen for this study precisely because they are difficult to study, and rarely studied, within existing methodological frameworks. This thesis demonstrates that even the least glamorous of graphic design history artefacts can be the source of compelling historical narratives. iv Acknowledgements This thesis would not have been written without the support of many people. Fellow students, other friends and extended family have helped in many small ways for which I am so grateful.
    [Show full text]
  • Tn '1 He Western Suburbs
    PLA:-J'Nl~G & E;\fVIRON~1EK'l' ISSlTES TN '1 HE WESTERN SUBURBS ~dB w P~P·i'~l!fG %4h!,H, ( J: '\ H t' ~~~. r·"l ~ C 1 ns 711 . 4099 ' ·. 451 WES:P b ~lARCH 19XJ 111. "t-3:<. c~"'-5') · P. I I 1- S <($ _~?~~--;- _""!_ ~-~ f>~ I MPE LIBRARY G,Pz:!Q [-~~~~~~~~~~~~ PLANNING & ENVIRONMEN-T ISSUES IN THE WESTERN. SUBURBS OF MELBOURNE A REPORT ON MATTERS RAISED IN RESPONSE TO A PROGRAM OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN THE FIRST STAGE OF THE WESTERN SUBURBS PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT ACTION PROGRAM A Consultant's report on Group Discussions with residents, and three detailed Task Group reports on industrial, residential and recreation· issues are available to those who made submissions :~nd others who request them. See the back of this report for details. Unfortunately it has not been possible within our limited budget· to translate this report into other languages. However, translations· of the major recommendations will be available from the Migrant Resource Centre in Footscray. .-. 711.4099 2908337 . ~-~; E·,._,.,~"·~.~lt~.. :-1' ...-./--~ 451 WES:P b Planning and environment issues in ~' ~ the western suburbs of Melbourne REPORT BY: INTERAGENCY STUDY TEAM FEBRUARY 1983 MINIMFtY FO" PLANNfNQ ANB lfNVffitONMcN'f li8AARY FOREWORD In July 1982 I announced that the Government would investigate living conditions and community concerns about environmental and land-use planning matters in the municipalities of Sunshine, Footscray, Williamstown, Altona and Werribee. The Western Suburbs Planning and Environment Action Program was launched in October with the publication of a multi-language broadsheet in local newspapers and the distribution of a facts booklet.
    [Show full text]
  • Iing Policies for the Melbourne Metropolitan Region Plan & Epa Library
    IING POLICIES FOR THE MELBOURNE METROPOLITAN REGION PLAN & EPA LIBRARY M0026673 MINISTRY FOR PLANNING AfJD ENVIRONMENT LIBRARY PLANNING POLICIES FOR THE MELBOURNE METROPOLITAN REGION NOVEMBER 1971 711.4099 731770 451 MEL:M Planning policies for the (1971) Melbourne metropolitan region MELBOURNE AND METROPOLITAN BOARD OF WORKS Chairman of the Board: A. H. Croxford, L.L.B. Honorary Commissioners (as at 14th September, 1971) R. Bassett, M.B.E., J.P. (City of Footscray) T. H. King (City of Malvern) A. E. Beckett, J.P. (City of Sandringham) G. F. Knowles, J.P. (Shire of Cranbourne) E. W. Best, C.M.G., J.P. (City of Melbourne) A. C. Laing, M.Sc, A.O.S.M. (City of Heidelberg) W. G. Boundy, J.P. (City of Camberwell) J. D. Langdon, J.P. (City of Richmond) G. R. Bricker, J.P. (City of Moorabbin) F. W. Le Page (City of Moorabbin) H. W. Cousins, I.S.M., J.P. (City of Essendon) E. O. Lundgren, J.P. (City of Box Hill) A. P. Donnelly, J.P. (City of Oakleigh) K. C. Marriott, J.P. (City of Springvale) G. C. Dreverman, J.P. (Shire of Eltham) L. W. Mason (City of Brighton) J. C. Duggan, J.P. (City of St. Kilda) V. R. Michael, J.P. (Shire of Whittlesea) D. W. Dumbrell (Shire of Bulla) K. E. Miller, J.P. (City of Dandenong) Sir Bernard Evans, Kt., D.S.O., E.D., F.R.A.I.A. (City of K. G. Mitchell (City of Broadmeadows) Melbourne) I. A. McNab (City of Keilor) M.
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Heartland
    ,---- -_.~------------,------,-----,-----,-----,-----,-----,------,-~"""'l INDUSTRIAL HEARTLAND Gary Vines Meibourne's Living Museum of the West INDUSTRIAL HEARTLAND: Introductior\to the Western Region Industrial Heritage Study by Gary Vines Meibourne's Living Museum of the West P.O. Box 60 HIGHPOINT CITY 3032 Ph. (03) 318 3544 w~h Andrew Ward Andrew Ward & Associates 12 Leonard Street BURWOOD 3125 Reprint of the Introduction © Meibourne's Living Museum olthe West Incorporated March 1990 ISBN 0 947308 15 6 Front cover illustration: Colonial Sugar Refinery, Whitehall Street, Yarraville. This complex of buildings is a key element of the industrial landscape of the lower Yarra This cover is prihted on re-cycled board INDUSTRIAL HEARTlAND: Introduction to the Western Region Industrial Heritage Study Gary Vines 19<XJ WESTERN REGION INDUSTRIAL HERITAGE STUDY This study has been written by Gary Vines of Melbourne's Living Museum of the West Inc. with assistance from Andrew Ward of Andrew Ward and Associates who provided specialist architectural comment on selected sites. The study was funded by a grant from the Regional Action Program of the Ministry for Planning and Environment. Victoria and was overseen by a steering committee made up of representatives of the Ministry for Planning and Environment, Museum of Victoria, National Trust of Australia, Footscray Institute of Technology, Western Region Commission and the Royal Historical Society of Victoria. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Sources for Industrial history In Victoria are scarce and diffi­ cult to find. In preparing this study I am Indebted to many people who have assisted in tracking down information on early Industries In the region. I have relied extensively on the existing conservation studies prepared by Graeme Butler and others for Essendon, Flemington/Kensington, Footscray and Williamstown as well as the various parts of the Western Region Cultural Heritage Study, Particularly the Outline History by John Lack and Olwen Ford.
    [Show full text]