DOCSLIB.ORG

Survey Among Residents of Multi- Apartment Buildings in Yerevan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Survey Among Residents of Multi- Apartment Buildings in Yerevan “De-risking and Scaling-Up Investment in Energy Efficient Building Retrofits” UNDP-GCF Project R E P O R T on the Survey among residents of multi- apartment buildings in Yerevan Astghik Mirzakhanyan National Expert on Social Vulnerability Assessment YEREVAN 2018 Contract: LTA-2018-005 Survey was conducted among the residents of 4 multi-apartment buildings (MABs) in Yerevan with the special focus on the impact of socio-economic status of household on its behavior related to the apartment heating and its readiness to cooperate with “De-risking and Scaling-up Investment in Energy Efficient Building Retrofits” Project, which will serve as a basis for accomplishing/adjusting the criteria for vulnerability assessment of households. The report was conducted in the framework of “De-risking and Scaling-up Investment in Energy Efficient Building Retrofits” Project, financed by the Green Climate Fund and being implemented by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) under coordination of the Ministry of Environment of the Republic of Armenia. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of the UNDP. The following report is the property of UNDP. Prior to applying, duplicating, transmitting and/or otherwise using the data, contained in the report, reference to the source is required and receiving UNDP official written consent is a must. © UNDP Armenia, 2018 2 Table of Content Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 4 1. Survey Methodology: basic principles and steps........................................................................... 4 2. Outcomes, conclusions and suggestions ....................................................................................... 7 3. Conclusions ....................................................................................................................................... 11 ANNEX 1.Number of beneficiary families residing in 24 multi-apartment buildings short-listed and presented by Yerevan Municipality ............................................................................................ 13 ANNEX 2. Social vulnerability characteristics of the residents of 10 potential buildings selected for household survey ............................................................................................................ 16 ANNEX 3. Q U E S T I O N N A I R E (for conducting survey with the purpose to adjust the social vulnerability criteria of household) .......................................................................................... 17 ANNEX 4. SUMMARY of results of the surveys carried out among families residing in three multi-apartment buildings of Yerevan ................................................................................................ 18 with the purpose to adjust social vulnerability assessment criteria .............................................. 18 ANNEX 5. The distribution of families registered in FBS, including the recipients of the both family and social allowances, by the administrative districts of Yerevan, as of 01.07.2018 ..... 20 ANNEX 6.SUMMARY of results of the survey of families residing in Yerevan Nor Nork administrative district, 3rd building at the 2nd lane of Gyulikevkhyan with the purpose to adjust social vulnerability assessment criteria ............................................................................................. 22 3 “De-Risking and Scaling-up Investment in Energy Efficient Building Retrofits” UNDP-GCF Project Introduction Based on the study of social vulnerability of population, the National Expert on Social Vulnerability Assessment proposed a system of main and additional criteria, as well as key indicators for the assessment of social vulnerability of family, which are described in the “Social Vulnerability Assessment of Population: Main Approaches, Criteria and System of Indicators” Report1. Particularly, as the main criteria for social vulnerability of the family are recommended the registration in the Family Benefit System (1st degree of vulnerability) and having within the family any member/members belonging to a socially vulnerable group (2nd degree of vulnerability). To justify the practical applicability of the aforementioned criteria, a pilot survey among at least 10 families should be carried out in accordance with the point 5 of the National Expert’s Terms of Reference. The pilot survey revealed the following two most applicable in practice criteria for assessment of social vulnerability of family, which are, at the same time, a well-known and widely spread among the country population: ❖ Families receiving family benefits; and ❖ Families having persons with disabilities, including the person disabled since childhood or a disabled child. Concerning the other proposed criteria for assessment of vulnerability of families, it’s worthy to mention that some additional - both official and non-official - sources of information (except of family itself) should be used to better justify the social status of the family, such as administrative databases of the various governmental bodies or peculiar information find out through inspectors of the condominiums and neighbors2. The methodology of pilot survey, basic outcomes, conclusions and recommendations are provided below. 1. Survey Methodology: basic principles and steps After having joint discussions with the program management and experts, as well as with Yerevan Municipality (hereinafter YM) and relevant specialists of the RA Ministry of Labor and 1 http://nature-ic.am/hy/publication/Social-Vulnerability-Assessment-of-Population/10558 2 It should be noted that some of the families, considering themselves as a low-income, have applied for a benefit, has been denied and, finally, is not aware whether they are registered in the family benefits system or not, moreover, they are fully unaware of their family insecurity unit. Both neighbors and condominium inspectors had great reservations about the vulnerability of some social groups, such as single pensioners (or only pensioners) and single-mothers. According to their observations, in some cases, the children are helping their pensioner parents, and the single mothers have «hidden» husbands. There will be some difficulties in dealing with the vulnerability of the "law-salary employed" and "unemployed" vulnerable groups, as the widespread phenomenon in the country are hidden employment, “black salary” and officially unregistered unemployment and so on. 4 “De-Risking and Scaling-up Investment in Energy Efficient Building Retrofits” UNDP-GCF Project Social Affairs (hereinafter MLSA), several key principles have been identified for organizing survey, which are the following: - Select the multi-apartment buildings for the family surveys from the list provided by the YM, taking into consideration that the implementation of UNDP and EU technical projects3 at the same buildings will lead to the synergy of results. - Exclude the administrative districts of Kentron and Arabkir of Yerevan from the list of buildings selected for surveys, since, according to the data provided by MLSA the number of families registered in the Family Benefits System (hereinafter FBS) and residing in multi-apartment buildings of the mentioned districts is relatively small4, hence the social impact of the Program could be lower. - Select from the list of buildings the ones inhabited by a maximum number of vulnerable families – both FBS beneficiaries and families with disabled member/members. - Give preference to the buildings that are multistoried (more than 5 floors) and more inhabited, i.e. have less so-called “closed doors” in order to increase the effectiveness in organizing the survey. - Also, include the building geographical location as a criterion of building selection, namely, the location in the north (relatively cold temperature), in the south (relatively warm temperature) and the middle sided (the mean temperature) districts of the capital city, as well as on the main street that further might indirectly serving as an "billboard" of the Program. - Taking into consideration the statistical fact, that the representation of vulnerable families in the selected buildings will be very disproportionate, as well as considering the cases of non-responses (rejections to be interviewed), select 10 potential multi- apartment buildings for the survey to organize it in a stepwise manner. - After completing the first stage survey, submit the summarized results to the Program Management Team (hereinafter PMT) to clarify the purpose and format of the second stage survey. The surveys were organized in sequence and/or in combination of the following steps: 3 The Yerevan Municipality with the EU technical assistance is implementing “EU4 Yerevan Solar Community” Program (hereinafter referred to as the "Arev" Program) aimed at the provision of electricity savings due to the use of solar energy and effective methods of lighting in multistoried buildings of the capital, consequently in the list provided by YM there are only multistoried, i.e. having 6 and more floors, buildings, 4 According to the MLSA database, among the residents of multi-apartment buildings of Yerevan as of 01.07.2018, in total, 4907 families registered in the FBS receive family allowance, of which only 177 (3.6%) residing in Arabkir administrative district and 200 (4.1%) in Kentron. It’s important to note
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Armenia by Alexander Iskandaryan
    Armenia by Alexander Iskandaryan Capital: Yerevan Population: 3.0 million GNI/capita, PPP: US$8,140 Source: The data above are drawn from the World Bank’sWorld Development Indicators 2014. Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Electoral Process 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.50 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 Civil Society 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 Independent Media 5.50 5.50 5.75 5.75 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 5.75 5.75 National Democratic Governance 5.00 5.00 5.25 5.25 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 Local Democratic Governance 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 Judicial Framework and Independence 5.25 5.00 5.00 5.25 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 Corruption 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.25 5.25 5.25 Democracy Score 5.18 5.14 5.21 5.21 5.39 5.39 5.43 5.39 5.36 5.36 NOTE: The ratings reflect the consensus of Freedom House, its academic advisers, and the author(s) of this report. The opinions expressed in this report are those of the author(s). The ratings are based on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 representing the highest level of democratic progress and 7 the lowest.
    [Show full text]
  • THIRD SECTION CASE of BAYATYAN V. ARMENIA
    THIRD SECTION CASE OF BAYATYAN v. ARMENIA (Application no. 23459/03) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 27 October 2009 This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision. BAYATYAN v. ARMENIA JUDGMENT 1 In the case of Bayatyan v. Armenia, The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Josep Casadevall, President, Elisabet Fura, Corneliu Bîrsan, Boštjan M. Zupan čič, Alvina Gyulumyan, Egbert Myjer, Ann Power, judges, and Stanley Naismith, Deputy Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 6 October 2009, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1. The case originated in an application (no. 23459/03) against the Republic of Armenia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by an Armenian national, Mr Vahan Bayatyan (“the applicant”), on 22 July 2003. 2. The applicant was represented by Mr J. M. Burns, Mr A. Carbonneau and Mr R. Khachatryan, lawyers practising in Georgetown (Canada), Patterson (USA) and Yerevan respectively. The Armenian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr G. Kostanyan, Representative of the Republic of Armenia at the European Court of Human Rights. 3. The applicant alleged that his conviction for refusal to serve in the army had unlawfully interfered with his right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. 4. By a decision of 12 December 2006, the Chamber declared the application admissible under Article 9 of the Convention and the remainder inadmissible.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Ground Survey
    Chapter 3 Ground Survey Chapter 3 Ground Survey 3.1 Drilling, Laboratory Tests The outline of the lithologic structure in Yerevan can be understood by the geological maps and the collected drilling database, which contains 5,094 logs; however, the data concerning the S wave velocity for the amplification analysis and the soil properties for the liquefaction analysis are not enough. To collect these data, 10 drillings were newly conducted in Yerevan and several tests were conducted using these boreholes. The quantities of the tests are shown in Table 3.1-1. Table 3.1-1 Quantities of Tests Category Quantities Drilling 30m x 10 Groundwater Level Measurement 10 Standard Penetration Test 129 Disturbed Soil Sampling 116 Laboratory Test 116 The drilling points are mainly set to the area where the Quaternary deposits cover because it is effective for the amplification of the earthquake motion by the ground and liquefaction potential. The geologic condition of Yerevan was estimated as follows from the existing information. The rock layer may be shallow in the northern area and the soft soils cover the southern area. Therefore, the selected newly boring points locate in the south of Yerevan city (Figure 3.1-1). The surface soils of each drilling points are shown in Table 3.1-1. The drilling logs are shown in Data Book. The example of drilling log is shown in Figure 3.1-1. 3-1 Final Report Vol. II Main Report 1 Figure 3.1-1 Location of drilling points Table 3.1-2 Surface geology of the drilling points Quaternary layer Symbol Age No.
    [Show full text]
  • IHF Report 2007
    ARMENIA 13 Arman Babajanian (far right), editor-in-chief of the oppositional Jamanak Yerevan newspaper, defending himself during a trial against him. © Photolur In its 2006 Freedom in the World re- Despite continued efforts by the in- port, Freedom House rated Armenia as be- ternational community to promote a ing “partly free.”1 The status of political peaceful settlement of the Nagorno rights in the country was given a score of Karabakh conflict, there was no concrete 5, and the status of civil liberties a score of progress in 2006. In an interview given to 4, on a scale from 1 (highest degree) to 7 pro-governmental media on 15 Decem- (lowest degree). The report concluded ber, President Robert Kocharyan said that that “Armenians cannot change govern- no resolution of the conflict should be ex- ment democratically.” pected prior to the May 2007 parliamen- At the end of the year, the government tary elections since an agreement could had yet to implement the recommenda- be “used adversely” by the political oppo- tions made by the Parliamentary Assembly sition. In light of this, the Helsinki Asso- of the Council of Europe in resolutions ciation of Armenia deemed it unlikely that 1361,2 13743 and 14054, all of which were any steps forward would actually be tak- adopted in 2004. These resolutions en before the March 2008 presidential addressed a number of major human elections. rights concerns, including the use of force In July, the National Assembly ap- to disperse peaceful demonstrations in proved an amnesty on the occasion of the 2004, the continued assault on journalists 15th anniversary of the Republic of Arme- and human rights defenders, flaws related nia.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Apartment Housing in Armenia Issues Note
    36187 HOUSING AND COMMUNAL SERVICES IN THE SOUTH CAUCASUS Public Disclosure Authorized Multi-Apartment Housing in Armenia Issues Note Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized March 2006 Infrastructure Department Europe and Central Asia Region Public Disclosure Authorized TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive summary 3 The vicious circle 5 Background 7 Overview of the housing and communal services sector 7 Restructuring by default 8 Private housing management and maintenance 11 Why don’t apartment owners manage their buildings? 14 Willingness and awareness 14 Necessity 15 Ability 19 Conclusion: what do we do about the vicious circle? 21 Annexes 23 Annex 1. Major projects and studies consulted in preparation of the note 23 Annex 2. Official average exchange rates 24 Annex 3. Summary of macro-economic information 25 Annex 4. Programs aimed at enhancing HOA operations in Armenia 26 Annex 5. Activities undertaken by international institutions under their HOA-related programs 28 Bibliography 29 Executive summary The purpose of the study is to understand how to break the vicious circle, in which housing maintenance and communal services providers* and residential customers are caught now in Armenia. Low tariffs and poor payment enforcement mean apartment owners do not pay the full costs of their housing. As a result, owners are discouraged from establishing homeowners associations (HOAs) and managing and maintaining their buildings. At the same time, without HOAs, it is hard to enforce payments for communal services, such as water, heating, garbage collection and building maintenance, since individual customers cannot be “disconnected” for non-payment. The study analyzes why owners of privatized apartments allow the buildings they live in, and the communal services they depend on, to deteriorate given that a legal framework for ownership has been adopted, and extensive technical assistance is being provided.
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Assessment Chapter 6
    Chapter 6 Risk Assessment Chapter 6 Risk Assessment 6.1 Damage of Buildings The building damage functions for multi-story residential buildings, for low-rise individual houses and for schools and hospitals are made mainly based on the damage by Spitak earthquake in 1988. Therefore, the seismic resistance of the buildings in 1988 is considered tacitly in creating the damage function; however, already over 20 years has passed from 1988. Most building in Yerevan has been constructed before 1991 and the aging effect to the seismic resistance of the buildings is a matter of concern. Also the maintenance of the residential buildings after 1991 is said to became poor than before. The effects of these issues are necessary to be included for realistic risk assessment. The quantitative effects are evaluated by expert judgment in discussing with Armenian researchers and concluded that the damage ratio is increased 10% for aging effect and 10% for poor maintenance issue. As a result, the damage functions in Figures 5.3-17, 5.3-19 and 5.3-20 are multiplied by 1.2 to calculate the damage of buildings. 6.1.1 Multi-story residential buildings Number of heavily damaged multi-story residential buildings per grid of 250m x 250m against two scenario earthquakes is shown in Figure 6.1-1. 6.1.2 Individual house Number of heavily damaged individual houses per grid of 250m x 250m is shown in Figure 6.1-2. 6.1.3 Summary of damage of buildings 1) Damages of multi-story buildings and individual houses at each district are summarized in Table 6.1-1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Law of the Republic of Armenia
    THE RA LAW ON MAKING AMENDMENTS AND ADDENDA IN THE RA PROCEDURAL CODE THE LAW OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA Adopted on 5 February 2009 ON MAKING AMENDMENTS AND ADDENDA IN THE PROCEDURAL CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA Article 1. In Article 3 of the Procedural Code of the Republic of Armenia as of 21 February 2007 (hereinafter the Code), 1) replace the word “courts” with the word “court” in Paragraph 2 of Part 3; 2) write down Part 4 with the following changes: “4. The administrative court is a specialized court”. Article 2. Remove the words “civic, criminal, and,” from Part 1 Article 22 of the Code; replace the words “of the courts” with the words “of the court.” Article 3. Write down Parts 1 and 2 Article 24 of the Code with the following changes: “1. The following courts of first instance function in Yerevan: 1) Erebuni and Nubarashen district court of first instance composed of the chairman and 7 judges of the court; 2) Kentron and Nork-Marash district court of first instance composed of the chairman and 13 judges of the court; 3) Ajapnyak and Davtashen district court of first instance composed of the chairman and 5 judges of the court; 4) Avan and Nor Nork district court of first instance composed of the chairman and 9 judges of the court; 5) Arabkir and Kanaker-Zeytun district court of first instance composed of the chairman and 9 judges of the court; 6) Shengavit district court of first instance composed of the chairman and 6 judges of the court; 7) Malatia-Sebastia district court of first instance composed of the chairman and 6 judges of the court.
    [Show full text]
  • Referral Guide for Reintegration of Returnees
    Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs of Armenia REFERRAL GUIDE FOR REINTEGRATION OF RETURNEES IN ARMENIA While IOM endeavours to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the content of this Review, the views, findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official position of IOM and its Member States. IOM does not accept any liability for any loss, which may arise from the reliance on information contained in this paper. The present review has been issued without formal editing by IOM. Publisher: International Organization for Migration IOM Mission in Armenia: UN House • 14 Petros Adamian Street, 1st floor • Yerevan 0010 • Armenia Tel.: ¥+374 10¤ 58 56 92 Fax: ¥+374 10¤ 54 33 65 www.iom.int © All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form by any means of electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without the prior written permission of the publisher. Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs of Armenia Referral Guide for Reintegration of Returnees in Armenia Second edition Yerevan 2016 Reintegration Referral Guide Contents List of abbreviations..................................................................................................7 Foreword ...................................................................................................................9 Part I Reintegration system in Armenia ..................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Pashinyan Reappointed Prime Minister Tions in Different Areas
    JANUARY 19, 2019 Mirror-SpeTHE ARMENIAN ctator Volume LXXXIX, NO. 26, Issue 4570 $ 2.00 NEWS The First English Language Armenian Weekly in the United States Since 1932 INBRIEF Putin Congratulates Hope after Seven Years of War for Syria Pashinyan Reconstruction of Churches first time on how reconstruction has begun created in the aftermath of the historic MOSCOW (Panorama.am) — Russian President in several holy places, offering renewed meeting between Patriarch Kirill of Vladimir Putin sent on Monday, January 14, a mes- and Holy Places hope to the thousands of Christians that Moscow and All Russia and Pope Francis in sage to Nikol Pashinyan, congratulating him on his were persecuted by the fanatical Jihad Havana, on February 12, 2016. appointment as prime minister of Armenia, the forces and had to flee their homes. The preface of the booklet was written by Kremlin press service reported. By Elisabeth Hellenbroich The publication comes thanks to the ini- Metropolitan Hilarion of Volokolamsk, Vladimir Putin noted, in part, that relations tiatives of a joint commission of Catholic chairman of the Department for External between Russia and Armenia rested on the good and Russian Orthodox priests which was see HOPE, page 6 traditions of friendship and mutual respect, and BERLIN — At the beginning of 2018 a that both countries had accumulated substantial booklet was published by Aid to the experience of fruitful cooperation in various areas. Church in Need (ACN International), a “I hope that our dialogue and constructive joint charity of pontifical right which through its Armenian Delegation Meets with al-Assad work will further strengthen Russian-Armenian allied cooperation, and that this will also help pro- offices in 24 countries supports Christians Syrian Leader Promises to wherever they are persecuted, oppressed or mote integration processes in the Eurasian region.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. METHODOLOGY of the SAMPLE to Conduct the Survey, a Multi-Level
    2. METHODOLOGY OF THE SAMPLE To conduct the survey, a multi-level proportional probability sample has been designed. Based on the 11 regional (marz) administrative and territorial division of RA, the sample design algorithm forms the preliminary sampling units (PSU) from the general population through the stratification method. The preliminary sampling units in marzes have been chosen by the following way: • PSU comprised 12 for Yerevan city, based on the number of district communities, • for those towns, which have more than 20000 population, separate preliminary sampling units were chosen in each marz, • small towns in each marz were grouped in one preliminary sampling unit, which was called “urban area”, • all villages in each marz were grouped in one preliminary sampling unit, which was called “rural area”. Thus, the total number of preliminary sampling units comprised 48. At the first stage of sampling the total volume of the sampling was divided into preliminary units by the proportion of the square root of the number of those households, which were involved in the given preliminary sampling units. 2001 Armenian population census results were used to calculate the mentioned proportions. Method of the proportion by using the square root was selected, as it, unlike the traditional PPS algorithm, enables to derive unbiased estimates of statistical indicators bringing to insignificant increase in variances within the preliminary sampling units on one hand, and on the other hand this approach increases the probability to select the settlements
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Site Mapping and Analytical Assessment Report Detailed Design, Technical Definition of Works, and Supporting
    Comprehensive site mapping and analytical assessment report Detailed Design, Technical Definition of Works, and Supporting Assessments/Studies required for the Removal of POPs Pesticides and Recovery of Associated Contaminated Soil along with Site Cleanup, Stabilization, Containment, and Monitoring applied to the Nubarashen Burial Site (Yerevan, Armenia) December 2017 Nubarashen Burial Site Comprehensive Site Mapping and Analytical Assessment Report Contractor: DEKONTA, a.s. Seat: Dretovice 109, 273 42 Stehelceves, Czech Republic Address: Volutova 2523, 158 00 Praha 5 Phone: + 420 235 522 252-3 Fax: + 420 235 522 254 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.dekonta.cz Contact Mr. Vojtech Musil persons: Phone: + 420 724 047 927 E-mail: [email protected] Client: United Nations Development Programme Address: 14 Petros Adamyan str. Yerevan 0010, Armenia Contact person: Ms. Gayane Gharagebakyan, [email protected], +37491 490 243 UNDP Project Coordinator Project: Comprehensive Site Mapping and Analytical Assessment Report Project title: Detailed Design, Technical Definition of Works, and Supporting Assessments/Studies required for the Removal of POPs Pesticides and Recovery of Associated Contaminated Soil along with Site Cleanup, Stabilization, Containment, and Monitoring applied to the Nubarashen Burial Site (Yerevan, Armenia) Report: FINAL Completed by: Mr. Prokop Barson Mr. Michal Černý Mr. Petr Lacina Mr. Otakar Pazdírek Mr. Marek Polák Mr. Boris Urbánek Mr. Adam Zapletal Reviewed and Mr. Jan Vaněk approved by: Head of Remediation and Environmental Projects Division Member of the Board of Directors Date: December 24, 2017 Copy No. : 1 2 3 Nubarashen Burial Site Comprehensive Site Mapping and Analytical Assessment Report CONTENTS Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. 1 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 10 2.
    [Show full text]
  • MTR-UNDP-Armenia-Pops-With 12 Annexes
    “Elimination of obsolete pesticide stockpiles and addressing POPs contaminated sites within a Sound Chemicals Management Framework in Armenia” Mid-Term Review Report GEF Agency: United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Ministry of Nature Protection (MNP) & Ministry of Emergency Implementing Partner: Situations (MES) Funding: GEF and Government of Armenia GEF Project ID: 4737 UNDP PIMS: 4905 UNDP Atlas Project ID: 00081909 Project Timeline: May 2015 – April 2019 Submitted by: Jean-Joseph Bellamy Submitted on: May 15, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................................................................. II LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS .......................................................................................................... III ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................................................................................................................. IV 1. MAIN CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS........................................................................... 1 1.1. BACKGROUND - INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................................................ 2 1.3. RECOMMENDATIONS .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]