DOCSLIB.ORG

2. METHODOLOGY of the SAMPLE to Conduct the Survey, a Multi-Level

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

2. METHODOLOGY OF THE SAMPLE To conduct the survey, a multi-level proportional probability sample has been designed. Based on the 11 regional (marz) administrative and territorial division of RA, the sample design algorithm forms the preliminary sampling units (PSU) from the general population through the stratification method. The preliminary sampling units in marzes have been chosen by the following way: • PSU comprised 12 for Yerevan city, based on the number of district communities, • for those towns, which have more than 20000 population, separate preliminary sampling units were chosen in each marz, • small towns in each marz were grouped in one preliminary sampling unit, which was called “urban area”, • all villages in each marz were grouped in one preliminary sampling unit, which was called “rural area”. Thus, the total number of preliminary sampling units comprised 48. At the first stage of sampling the total volume of the sampling was divided into preliminary units by the proportion of the square root of the number of those households, which were involved in the given preliminary sampling units. 2001 Armenian population census results were used to calculate the mentioned proportions. Method of the proportion by using the square root was selected, as it, unlike the traditional PPS algorithm, enables to derive unbiased estimates of statistical indicators bringing to insignificant increase in variances within the preliminary sampling units on one hand, and on the other hand this approach increases the probability to select the settlements with a small number of households. As a result of the above-mentioned algorithm, the following distribution of the sampling volume was derived: PSU Marz Name Household Square % Selected root household 1 YEREVAN Adjapnyak district 26851 163.9 2.83 72 2 Avan district 12333 111.1 1.92 49 3 Arabkir district 36369 190.7 3.30 84 4 Davitashen district 10063 100.3 1.73 44 5 Erebuni district 26776 163.6 2.83 72 6 Kentron district 34056 184.5 3.19 81 7 Malatia-Sebastia district 33137 182.0 3.15 80 8 Nor Nork district 36525 191.1 3.30 84 9 Nork-Marash district 2502 50.0 0.86 22 10 Nubarashen district 2020 44.9 0.78 20 11 Shengavit district 34517 185.8 3.21 82 12 Qanaqer-Zeytun district 20812 144.3 2.49 63 13 ARAGATSOTN Urban Area 3485 59.0 1.02 26 14 Rural Area 26377 162.4 2.81 71 15 Ashtarak town 5558 74.6 1.29 33 5 PSU Marz Name Household Square % Selected root household 16 ARARAT Urban Area 2825 53.2 0.92 23 17 Rural Area 44780 211.6 3.66 93 18 Artashat town 7489 86.5 1.50 38 19 Ararat town 4330 65.8 1.14 29 20 Masis town 4846 69.6 1.20 31 21 ARMAVIR Urban Area 3019 54.9 0.95 24 22 Rural Area 39260 198.1 3.43 87 23 Armavir town 8330 91.3 1.58 40 24 Vagharshapat town 13038 114.2 1.97 50 25 GEGHARKUNIK Urban Area 7894 88.8 1.54 39 26 Rural Area 33968 184.3 3.19 81 27 Gavar (Kamo) town 7041 83.9 1.45 37 28 Sevan town 6354 79.7 1.38 35 29 LORI Urban Area 19621 140.1 2.42 61 30 Rural Area 33018 181.7 3.14 80 31 Vanadzor town 33804 183.9 3.18 81 32 KOTAYK Urban Area 8141 90.2 1.56 40 33 Rural Area 27000 164.3 2.84 72 34 Hrazdan town 14623 120.9 2.09 53 35 Abovyan town 13626 116.7 2.02 51 36 Charentsavan town 7551 86.9 1.50 38 37 SHIRAK Urban Area 6373 79.8 1.38 35 38 Rural Area 28046 167.5 2.90 74 39 Gyumri town 40823 202.0 3.49 89 40 SYUNIK Urban Area 8249 90.8 1.57 40 41 Rural Area 12148 110.2 1.91 48 42 Kapan town 11646 107.9 1.87 47 43 Goris town 5102 71.4 1.24 31 44 VAYOTS DZOR Urban Area 5746 75.8 1.31 33 45 Rural Area 8529 92.4 1.60 41 46 TAVUSH Urban Area 8522 92.3 1.60 41 47 Rural Area 21432 146.4 2.53 64 48 Idjevan town 5103 71.4 1.24 31 813658 5783.1 100.0 2539 At the second stage of sampling preliminary sampling units corresponding to Yerevan city and the large cities were included in the sampling by the probability of 1, in the other units, settlements were selected through the random sampling method – by the proportional probability of the number of households in the given settlement. At the third stage of sampling clusters appropriate to the territorial units were selected from the “urban areas”, which had been used during the population census. The sample of clusters was designed according to the PPS algorithm. Thus, at the second and third stages of the sample, the self-weighting of households in the preliminary sampling units was ensured. Households' addresses were selected using the systematic selection method. 6.
Recommended publications
  • UNITED NATIONS COMMITTEE AGAINST TORTURE 59 Session 7 November to 7 December 2016 PARTNERSHIP for OPEN SOCIETY INITIATIVE's J

    UNITED NATIONS COMMITTEE AGAINST TORTURE 59 Session 7 November to 7 December 2016 PARTNERSHIP for OPEN SOCIETY INITIATIVE's J

    UNITED NATIONS COMMITTEE AGAINST TORTURE 59th Session 7 November to 7 December 2016 PARTNERSHIP FOR OPEN SOCIETY INITIATIVE’S JOINT SUBMISSION TO THE COMMITTEE AGAINST TORTURE ON THE FOURTH PERIODIC REPORT OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA REGARDING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CONVENTION AGAINST TORTURE AND OTHER CRUEL, INHUMAN OR DEGRADING TREATMENT OF PUNISHMENT October 17, 2016, Yerevan, Armenia Hereby, the Partnership for Open Society Initiative,1 representing more than 60 civil society organizations, presents a joint submission prepared by the following civil society organizations, public monitoring groups, human rights lawyers and attorneys: 1. Coalition to Stop Violence Against Women; 2. Center for Rights Development NGO; 3. Committee to Protect Freedom of Expression; 4. Foundation Against the Violation of Law NGO; 5. Helsinki Citizens’ Assembly–Vanadzor; 6. Helsinki Committee of Armenia Human Rights Defender NGO; 7. Journalists' Club Asparez; 8. Open Society Foundations – Armenia; 9. Protection of Rights without Borders NGO; 10. Rule of Law Human Rights NGO; 11. Group of Public Monitors Implementing Supervision over the Criminal-Executive Institutions and Bodies of the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Armenia; 12. Public Monitoring Group at the Detention Facilities of the Police of the Republic of Armenia; 13. Davit Khachaturyan, Justice Group, Open Society-Foundations-Armenia, Expert, Ph.D; 14. Inessa Petrosyan, Attorney; 15. Tigran Hayrapetyan, Attorney; 16. Tigran Safaryan, Attorney; 17. Vahe Grigoryan, Attorney, Legal Consultant at EHRAC (Middlesex University). Contacts Persons David Amiryan Karine Ghazaryan Open Society Foundations-Armenia Open Society Foundations-Armenia Deputy Director for Programs Civil Society Program Coordinator E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] 1 http://www.partnership.am/en/index 1 Contents INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................................................
  • Armenia by Alexander Iskandaryan

    Armenia by Alexander Iskandaryan

    Armenia by Alexander Iskandaryan Capital: Yerevan Population: 3.0 million GNI/capita, PPP: US$8,140 Source: The data above are drawn from the World Bank’sWorld Development Indicators 2014. Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Electoral Process 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.50 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 Civil Society 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 Independent Media 5.50 5.50 5.75 5.75 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 5.75 5.75 National Democratic Governance 5.00 5.00 5.25 5.25 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 Local Democratic Governance 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 Judicial Framework and Independence 5.25 5.00 5.00 5.25 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 Corruption 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.25 5.25 5.25 Democracy Score 5.18 5.14 5.21 5.21 5.39 5.39 5.43 5.39 5.36 5.36 NOTE: The ratings reflect the consensus of Freedom House, its academic advisers, and the author(s) of this report. The opinions expressed in this report are those of the author(s). The ratings are based on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 representing the highest level of democratic progress and 7 the lowest.
  • EU Relations with Armenia and Azerbaijan.Pdf

    EU Relations with Armenia and Azerbaijan.Pdf

    DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR EXTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS EU relations with Armenia and Azerbaijan ABSTRACT The EU is currently reshaping its relationship with Armenia and Azerbaijan through new agreements for which the negotiations ended (Armenia) or started (Azerbaijan) in February 2017. After Yerevan’s decision to join the EAEU (thereby renouncing to sign an AA/DCFTA), the initialling of the CEPA provides a new impetus to EU-Armenia relations. It highlights Armenia’s lingering interest in developing closer ties with the EU and provides a vivid illustration of the EU’s readiness to respond to EaP countries’ specific needs and circumstances. The CEPA is also a clear indication that the EU has not engaged in a zero- sum game with Russia and is willing to exploit any opportunity to further its links with EaP countries. The launch of negotiations on a new EU-Azerbaijan agreement – in spite of serious political and human rights problems in the country – results from several intertwined factors, including the EU’s energy security needs and Baku’s increasing bargaining power. At this stage, Azerbaijan is interested only in forms of cooperation that are not challenging the political status quo. However, the decline in both world oil prices and domestic oil production in this country is creating bargaining opportunities for the EU in what promises to be a difficult negotiation. EP/EXPO/B/AFET/FWC/2013-08/Lot6/15 EN October 2017 - PE 603.846 © European Union, 2017 Policy Department, Directorate-General for External Policies This paper was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Foreign Affairs.
  • Violence Against Journalists in Armenia in 2008-9

    Violence Against Journalists in Armenia in 2008-9

    Contents PREFACE...........................................................................................88 PART I: VIOLENCE......................................................................... 91 Kristine Aghalaryan: Assailants Unknown: Investigation Surrounding Assault on Reporter Dropped.............................................................92 Ararat Davtyan: Mere Coincidence? Vardan Ayvazyan’s Links to Baghdasaryan Assault….......................................................99 Ararat Davtyan: Photo-Journalist’s Attackers Pardoned; Criminal Proceedings Dropped …....................................................106 Ararat Davtyan: Assault on Argishti Kiviryan is Attempted Murder…………………....108 Kristine Aghalaryan: Six Reporters Assaulted During Yerevan Municipal Elections…….. 113 Kristine Aghalaryan: Reporters Prevented From Covering the Story: SMEJA Officials Disagree……………............................................... 117 Ararat Davtyan: T.V. Anchor Nver Mnatsakanyan Assaulted: Perpetrators Never Identified….........................................................119 PART II: JOURNALISTS AND MEDIA IN THE COURTS..... 121 Kristine Aghalaryan: Mayor of Ijevan v Investigative Journalists: Plaintiff to Appeal Lower Court Decision……………........................ 122 A. Simonyan: Municipality of Ijevan v The Investigative Journalists: The Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights is like a “Voice in the Desert”……………..........................................126 Kristine Aghalaryan, Ararat Davtyan: Photo-Journalist Gagik Shamshyan
  • Mission in Armenia 29 March to 3 April 2008

    Mission in Armenia 29 March to 3 April 2008

    Mission in Armenia 29 March to 3 April 2008 June 2008 - N°499/2 Mission in Armenia, 29 March to 3 April 2008 FOREWORD Alerted by both the "Democracy in Armenia" group and the Civil Society Institute (an FIDH affiliate) to the violent repression that followed the presidential elections in this country in February 2008, the undersigned lawyers and jurist were mandated by the President of the Paris Bar Association (M. le Bâtonnier de l’Ordre des Avocats de Paris) and the International Union of Lawyers (l’Union Internationale des Avocats) on one hand and, on the other hand, the FIDH (International Federation of Human Rights). The mission visited Yerevan from 29 March to 3 April to report on the situation of the right to defend oneself and the right to freedoms in the Republic of ARMENIA following the events that took place in February and March 2008. INTRODUCTION Before considering the legal and juridical context of the mission's work, it is appropriate to recall some chronological milestones to put into perspective the current situation in Armenia and its evolution, seventeen years after the independence of the Republic of Armenia was proclaimed in the Southern Caucasus. - 21 September, 1991: the Republic of Armenia becomes independent following a referendum. - October 1991: Election by universal suffrage of Mr. Levon TER-PETROSIAN, who becomes the first President of the Republic of Armenia. - 1992-1994: Fighting in the autonomous region of Nagorno-Karabakh between the opposing Armenian self- defence forces and the Azerbaijan armed forces. A cease-fire comes into force on 14 May 1994.
  • THIRD SECTION CASE of BAYATYAN V. ARMENIA

    THIRD SECTION CASE of BAYATYAN V. ARMENIA

    THIRD SECTION CASE OF BAYATYAN v. ARMENIA (Application no. 23459/03) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 27 October 2009 This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision. BAYATYAN v. ARMENIA JUDGMENT 1 In the case of Bayatyan v. Armenia, The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Josep Casadevall, President, Elisabet Fura, Corneliu Bîrsan, Boštjan M. Zupan čič, Alvina Gyulumyan, Egbert Myjer, Ann Power, judges, and Stanley Naismith, Deputy Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 6 October 2009, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1. The case originated in an application (no. 23459/03) against the Republic of Armenia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by an Armenian national, Mr Vahan Bayatyan (“the applicant”), on 22 July 2003. 2. The applicant was represented by Mr J. M. Burns, Mr A. Carbonneau and Mr R. Khachatryan, lawyers practising in Georgetown (Canada), Patterson (USA) and Yerevan respectively. The Armenian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr G. Kostanyan, Representative of the Republic of Armenia at the European Court of Human Rights. 3. The applicant alleged that his conviction for refusal to serve in the army had unlawfully interfered with his right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. 4. By a decision of 12 December 2006, the Chamber declared the application admissible under Article 9 of the Convention and the remainder inadmissible.
  • Chapter 3 Ground Survey

    Chapter 3 Ground Survey

    Chapter 3 Ground Survey Chapter 3 Ground Survey 3.1 Drilling, Laboratory Tests The outline of the lithologic structure in Yerevan can be understood by the geological maps and the collected drilling database, which contains 5,094 logs; however, the data concerning the S wave velocity for the amplification analysis and the soil properties for the liquefaction analysis are not enough. To collect these data, 10 drillings were newly conducted in Yerevan and several tests were conducted using these boreholes. The quantities of the tests are shown in Table 3.1-1. Table 3.1-1 Quantities of Tests Category Quantities Drilling 30m x 10 Groundwater Level Measurement 10 Standard Penetration Test 129 Disturbed Soil Sampling 116 Laboratory Test 116 The drilling points are mainly set to the area where the Quaternary deposits cover because it is effective for the amplification of the earthquake motion by the ground and liquefaction potential. The geologic condition of Yerevan was estimated as follows from the existing information. The rock layer may be shallow in the northern area and the soft soils cover the southern area. Therefore, the selected newly boring points locate in the south of Yerevan city (Figure 3.1-1). The surface soils of each drilling points are shown in Table 3.1-1. The drilling logs are shown in Data Book. The example of drilling log is shown in Figure 3.1-1. 3-1 Final Report Vol. II Main Report 1 Figure 3.1-1 Location of drilling points Table 3.1-2 Surface geology of the drilling points Quaternary layer Symbol Age No.
  • REPORT by the COMMISSIONER for HUMAN RIGHTS MR THOMAS HAMMARBERG on HIS VISIT to ARMENIA 7 – 11 October 2007

    REPORT by the COMMISSIONER for HUMAN RIGHTS MR THOMAS HAMMARBERG on HIS VISIT to ARMENIA 7 – 11 October 2007

    Strasbourg, 30 April 2008 CommDH(2008)4 Original version REPORT BY THE COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS MR THOMAS HAMMARBERG ON HIS VISIT TO ARMENIA 7 – 11 October 2007 For the attention of the Committee of Ministers and the Parliamentary Assembly CommDH(2008)4 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................ 4 II. NATIONAL SYSTEM FOR HUMAN RIGHTS PROTECTION....................................................... 5 1. HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDER (O MBUDSMAN )...........................................................................................6 2. CIVIL SOCIETY ....................................................................................................................................6 3. NATIONAL ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS ............................................7 III. ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE.................................................................................................. 7 1. STATUS OF JUDGES AND THEIR INDEPENDENCE .....................................................................................8 2. AUXILIARIES OF JUSTICE .....................................................................................................................9 3. THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL ..................................................................................................................9 a) Access to justice and transparency of legal process...........................................................9
  • Hayastan All-Armenian Fund's Annual Telethon Raises $11,109,633

    Hayastan All-Armenian Fund's Annual Telethon Raises $11,109,633

    DECEMBER 1, 2018 Mirror-SpeTHE ARMENIAN ctator Volume LXXXIX, NO. 20, Issue 4564 $ 2.00 NEWS The First English Language Armenian Weekly in the United States Since 1932 INBRIEF No Armenians injured In Aleppo gas attack ALEPPO (Panorama) — No Armenians suffered as a result of an attack at a distance of 3 kilometers from the Armenian Consulate General in Aleppo on Sunday, November 25, the Armenian Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a Twitter post. More than 100 people were taken to hospitals in Aleppo, Syria’s largest city, after a suspected poi- son gas attack over the weekend, according to Syrian state media and a British-based human Volunteers and presenters, including Artsakh President Bako Sahakyan and Primate Parkev Martirossyan, at the annual telethon rights group. Around 100 people were injured in toxic gas attack on the government-controlled city of Aleppo Saturday, according to Syrian state media and a Hayastan All-Armenian Fund’s Annual British-based human rights group. Russia has carried out air strikes against Syrian rebels it accuses of launching a chemical attack on the government-held city of Aleppo, the BBC Telethon Raises $11,109,633 reports. LOS ANGELES — In an annual telethon the importance of its projects implemented the fund on November 22. In May, Argentina Armenians broadcast from Los Angeles, Hayastan All- in Armenia and Karabakh. Sarkissian had promised to donate his one Armenian Fund raised more than $11 mil- “The money [to be raised in this year’s salary to the fund. He signed a doc- Organize Protest lion that will mostly be spent on its ongo- telethon] will be spent on the improvement ument on donating half of his annual ing infrastructure projects in Nagorno- of the important infrastructures and devel- salary, which is 5,753,496 drams ($11,870).
  • Armenia Hostage Crisis Continues

    Armenia Hostage Crisis Continues

    JULY 23, 2016 Mirror-SpeTHE ARMENIAN ctator Volume LXXXVII, NO. 1, Issue 4445 $ 2.00 NEWS The First English Language Armenian Weekly in the United States Since 1932 INBRIEF French Senate to Armenia Hostage Crisis Continues Discuss Armenian Genocide YEREVAN (Combined Sources) — Pro- opposition gunmen are holding four police PARIS (PanARMENIAN.Net) — The French officers hostage, officials said Tuesday, July Senate will discuss the bill to outlaw the denial of 19, two days after they seized a police the Armenian Genocide in September, Armenia’s building, killing one officer and taking sev- public TV reports. eral hostages. The French National Assembly on July 1 voted The gunmen seized the police station on unanimously to penalize denial or trivialization of Sunday, before demanding Armenians take all crimes against humanity, including the to the streets to secure the release of jailed Armenian Genocide. opposition politicians. The amendment of a previous law, adopted in the first reading, criminalizes denial with one year (PHOTOLUR PHOTO) imprisonment and a 45,000 euro fine. The crimes included in the text are genocides, “other crimes against humanity,” “the crime of enslavement and exploitation of an enslaved per- son” and “war crimes.” City of Ani on UNESCO Demonstrators in Yerevan (Russia Times Photo) World Heritage List PARIS (PanARMENIAN.Net) — The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural situation without bloodshed,” far refused to surrender. Organization (UNESCO) cultural agency on Jirair Sefilian, second from left, as he was arrested in June Armenia’s first deputy police The hostages include Armenia’s Deputy Friday, July 15 added a ruined Armenian city inside chief Hunan Pogosyan told AFP.
  • IHF Report 2007

    IHF Report 2007

    ARMENIA 13 Arman Babajanian (far right), editor-in-chief of the oppositional Jamanak Yerevan newspaper, defending himself during a trial against him. © Photolur In its 2006 Freedom in the World re- Despite continued efforts by the in- port, Freedom House rated Armenia as be- ternational community to promote a ing “partly free.”1 The status of political peaceful settlement of the Nagorno rights in the country was given a score of Karabakh conflict, there was no concrete 5, and the status of civil liberties a score of progress in 2006. In an interview given to 4, on a scale from 1 (highest degree) to 7 pro-governmental media on 15 Decem- (lowest degree). The report concluded ber, President Robert Kocharyan said that that “Armenians cannot change govern- no resolution of the conflict should be ex- ment democratically.” pected prior to the May 2007 parliamen- At the end of the year, the government tary elections since an agreement could had yet to implement the recommenda- be “used adversely” by the political oppo- tions made by the Parliamentary Assembly sition. In light of this, the Helsinki Asso- of the Council of Europe in resolutions ciation of Armenia deemed it unlikely that 1361,2 13743 and 14054, all of which were any steps forward would actually be tak- adopted in 2004. These resolutions en before the March 2008 presidential addressed a number of major human elections. rights concerns, including the use of force In July, the National Assembly ap- to disperse peaceful demonstrations in proved an amnesty on the occasion of the 2004, the continued assault on journalists 15th anniversary of the Republic of Arme- and human rights defenders, flaws related nia.
  • Annual Report on the Activities of the Human Rights Defender in 2006

    Annual Report on the Activities of the Human Rights Defender in 2006

    ANNUAL REPORT ON ACTIVITIES OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA'S HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDER AND VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS IN ARMENIA 2006 The present "Annual Report for 2006 on Activities of the Republic of Armenia's Human Rights Defender" has been translated and published with the financial support of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) ISBN 978-99941-0-213-6 ANNUAL REPORT ON ACTIVITIES OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA'S HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDER AND VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS IN ARMENIA 2006 Yerevan, 2007 Yerevan 2007 RA Human Rights Defender A. Harutyunyan In the result of constitutional amendments, Human Rights Defender's Office was mandated as a constitutional institution. On February 17, 2005, National Assembly of RA by the votes of more than 3/5 of the total num- ber of deputies elected Doctor of Law, Professor Armen Harutyunyan as a first parliamentary Human Rights Defender of RA. Human Rights Defender is an independent official, whose main mission is to prevent and restore human rights and fundamental freedoms violated by the state and local self-governing bodies or their officials. The letters of complaint, addressed to the Defender, are various and concern almost all spheres of functioning of state and local self-governing bodies. The actuality of the report is determined also by the circumstance that for the first time are sep- arated the analysis of the statutory- legal act that leads to the human rights violations and the analysis of detached provisions, as well as the shortcoming in law enforcement practices. This report aims to raise a list of questions that are peculiar to the post soviet countries and exist in our country.